Sorry, all out. I have one hallelujah left though ...:-) It's nearly
Christmas!
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 December 2003 03:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Can I get an Amen!
Eric Fretz
L-3
Hi All
Just a heads up about a new virus (or possibly a variation of an
existing one) we received. The virus executed when a user unzipped the
the details.zip file. Furthermore there was a text file with what looks
like a random letter generated name. We scan zip files, but nothing was
picked
Morning All
The nasty fella is called: Worm_YAHA.AF and you need Trends pattern file
691 to pick it up.
Enjoy your weekend.
clearing the coffee cups and empty pizza boxes Sander
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar
Sent: 27 November 2003 01:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
You are looking in Explorer at your priv.edb with exchange running or
stopped? Stop exchange and see the real file size.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 November 2003 08:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store Size
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sander Van
Butzelaar
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 11:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Information Store Size Question
You are looking in Explorer at your priv.edb with exchange running or
stopped? Stop exchange and see the real file
I also get way more then a Gig a minute when I backup using a custom
script pointing to Dev0, restores are a bit of a problem though
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 August 2003 10:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup
and how much mail and public folders are you talking about?
Regards,
Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE
Sysadmin Manager
Korbi.net
-Original Message-
From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 July 2003 01:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange upgrade
Hi guys
to Exchange 2000 in timebut not at the moment due to
costs.
I only have a single PDC, and 10 clients.
Stores are approx Pub.edb = 4Gb Priv.edb = 8Gb
Thnx again
David
--
From: Sander Van Butzelaar[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 31
Originator means it's an NDR. Are you seeing a lot of activity? Mail
relay? Virus spoofing attack perhaps?
Regards,
Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE
Sysadmin Manager
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 July 2003 03:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I wouldn't worry too much about it, unless volumes increase to thousands
per day:-) You should get copies of mail delivery attempts in your
administrator box. You can see which users don't or no longer exist on
your system.
Regards,
Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE
Sysadmin Manager
life experience with this product? Any views? There doesn't
appear to be much info on the actual inner workings of the product, nor
any disaster recovery.
Regards,
Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE
Sysadmin Manager
Korbi.net
Both your DCs are GCs. Good for exchange but one of the FSMO roles (the
Infrastructure Master) does not want to be on a GC. It doesn't update if
it is run on a GC. Not sure if this applies in a single domain too.
Q1971322:
NOTE: The Infrastructure Master (IM) role should be held by a domain
Do you want to have both .com and .loc as an email address, or only
.loc? One way would be with a smart host that could rewrite your .loc to
.com on outgoing mail.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 June 2003 02:13 PM
To: Exchange
Nothing may have changed on your administrative side, but something
surely changed on your user's side. Two people are editing the same
items on your server. Same job roles perhaps? New person taking over a
function from another person? I've seen this happen in a hand over
period.
Sander
Another option:
1. Full backup
2. Shut exchange server down
2. Remove small drive
3. Ghost small drive onto new big drive (on another pc if you want)
4. Replace new drive
5. Start up
No need to run any patches or Exmerge. I personally would go for the
Optimiser option, but if you are anal about a
Well done Seb! You obviously don't read much on this list.
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 February 2003 02:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Is this working
Test
uop Guildford IT
Tel:+44 1483 466107
E-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
I want the Tenor Unplugged version !
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 January 2003 03:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archives - Buy yours today.
All the Hummert posts have been purged. Expensive process.
-- Original Message
Here's one: Do any of your customers have Unix based email systems? Plain text will
work 100%
Regards,
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Tim Gowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 January 2003 10:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Justifying text-only Internet Mail
I'm about
Ah, he forgot to add the email addresses of the HR department to the Spam list.
Terminal error!
Regards,
Sander Van Butzelaar
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 January 2003 07:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using script to get header
I have an idea it was the antivirus software that wasn't stopped while
putting on SP4 that caused the failure in the first place (although he
doesn't state that there was AV on before)
Just a hunch ..:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
My vote goes with toast then..:-(. I know of no quick recovery if all those avenues
have been tried without success.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 December 2002 12:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: recover deleted mail items Exchange
I came across your address on the net??? Are you in sales or what? You
either subscribe to this list or you don't.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 December 2002 02:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Very OT - txt handling
Hi there,
I came
Haven't seen that behaviour before. The functionality definitely works
as we use it (mail to admin, sender and receiver). Maybe try
re-installing Scanmail. Your service packs up-to-date? No other problems
with mail going out, ie also getting stuck in the outbox?
Sander
-Original Message-
Well yes, after that Australian disaster with sheep Sheila ...oh aussies
originally also came from England
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 December 2002 07:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Haiku Friday
Yep leave it to the British to
I doubt you'll even see the impact at all. No problem with it. For an
ASP customer I need to run Exchange 2000 and SQL 200 on one box, now
that is a baddie. Those two apps both like mucho resources. Not
impossible, but not first prise either.
Cheers
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Chris
Morning all
Weird feeling went the sun disappears for a couple of minutes...we just
had a full eclipse and it went pitch black.
Sander
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sander Van
Butzelaar
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Morning all
Weird feeling went the sun disappears for a couple of minutes...we just
had a full eclipse and it went pitch black.
Sander
experience to be treasured and respected. The
real thing, that is.
Exchange is still humming along, I bet...
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sander Van
Butzelaar
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
don't back up the workstations, but most
think that you only can save PSTs on local drives ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of
Sander Van Butzelaar
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 07:05
To: Exchange Discussions
, but most think that you only can save
PSTs
on local drives ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van
Butzelaar
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 07:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'
Why
We are, we cover South Africa and some sub-Sahara African countries. You
don't want to know how many people they stick on a 64 k line on this
continent...:-) Bandwidth, oh bandwidth where art thou...
Sander
Korbi.net
-Original Message-
From: Henley, John K (Johnny), METRO
Logic would dictate that it can, otherwise you would need a dedicated
server for that only. That sounds silly. I have however not tested this
in real life.
frantically looking in some documentation Sander
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:jwkelley;qualcomm.com]
Sent: 06
I have a couple of users who do the same thing. They don't want to
delete old mail (for whatever reason) and I can't keep extending their
mailbox sizes. So they move to PST. Be aware of the risks here! Make a
periodic backup of that PST as hard drives are prone to failure.
Sander
-Original
PSTs. Period. Either its in their mailbox or it is not
that important.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van
Butzelaar
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 05:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using a PST
What exactly do you mean by edit containers and what version of
Exchange are you running.
Regards
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Magalhaes [mailto:CarlosM;trencor.net]
Sent: 25 October 2002 12:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Permissions
Hi there all,
Is there a way I
Regards,
Carlos Magalhaes
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:sander;korbi.net]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Permissions
What exactly do you mean by edit containers and what version of
Exchange are you
this permission
and
application. Don't you agree?
Thanks for info and tips though I will use them!
Regards,
Carlos Magalhaes
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:sander;korbi.net]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Permissions
May I recommend the following literature by Dale Carnegie..:-)
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0671723650/qid=1035442040/
sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/102-6532048-4852914?v=glance
(Link wraps)
Cheers
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van
Butzelaar
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
May I recommend the following literature by Dale Carnegie..:-)
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg
Waiting for a time out perhaps?
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 October 2002 03:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP retry queues
Hey all. I am looking for someone who is smarter than me :) to explain
to me why Exchange 2000 is
Lol!
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 October 2002 11:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Exchange Server
If you were referring to me, I'll show you my willy...
Regards
_MR._ Andrea Coppini
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy I.
MSDN is your friend! (until you actually find that the specific thing
you need to know how to get around isn't in there...:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 September 2002 09:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: support for
For one, you would lose your single instance. Not sure how important
this is for you.
M pie, it's nearly lunch time here...
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 September 2002 11:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge
PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 September 2002 11:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC vs. Exmerge
Not too important. We only have 1 site. If I exmerge, do I not get all
the
rich Exchange info tacked onto the user accounts?
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Chris
Just curious why you say that. I backup to different removable hard
drives Monday to Thursday and to tape on Friday (keep one tape off-site)
I find this solution not too bad and have found hard drive restores
faster and more reliable than tape restores (I detest a CRC error on the
, not the
computers!
BTW We recently were hit by complaints from PETA because we serve fish
in
our restaurant (but not in tacos!)
Chris Quinn
IT Manager
Blue Planet Aquarium
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 September 2002 09:15
To: Exchange Discussions
Well for one, who is going to accept 15MB on the incoming side? I
definitely wouldn't. Without attachments 15MB is a hell of a lot of
typing ..:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 September 2002 11:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Maybe Swink has been bought out by the Post Office:-)
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 September 2002 01:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
Well, I sent it on Friday
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
Without being funny, read the material available on Microsoft's site
about Exchange 5.5 and Exchange 2000 and test, test, test.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 August 2002 08:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Migrating from 5.5 to 2000
I
Hi All
I'm needing to strip some files (and save them locally) of emails that
go to a specific public folder. I'm only interested in the attachments,
not the actual emails. I thought of using the Exchange Workflow
Designer. There doesn't seem to be too much help on this tool.
Has any one used
Subject: RE: Exchange Workflow Designer - Exchange 2000
This can be done using CDO... www.cdolive.com might have some code
samples
to aid you in the task.
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 6:35 AM
To: Exchange
I subscribe to this one, does that qualify? ...:-)
Happy searching!
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 August 2002 03:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Listserve Recommendations
So it seems I'm soliciting opinions on list serve software..
This has been discussed before (all the different types of spam
filtering) and I think one of the drawbacks from this type anti-spam was
that other people decide for you what is spam.
Cheers
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 August
What about the aditional overhead (cost) of Windows 2000 server as he
will need an AD. I would say rather stick with NT4.0 and Exchange 5.5
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Ragar, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 August 2002 05:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
, that would mean everything in
mydomain.com
would go to the exchange box?
Wendy
- Original Message -
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 1:59 AM
Subject: RE: Changing Reply To address
I also use a Unix box
, Devon Rex, or one of those new
Munchkins?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange
You might have a rights issue. I think if you have the three edb files
you could probably get quite far, untill some validation of the account
with admin rights occurs. Worth a try though! Pity one can't add a BDC
to the SBS system and promote that one to PDC afterwards, so that you
get the
It's Windows 2000 without the AD ...:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 August 2002 10:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NT2000 SP3 with Exchange 2000 SP3
pedant
What's NT2000?
/pedant
Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 August 2002 10:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Re: Moving Exchange from Small Business Server
You might have a rights issue. I think
So how did you find this David? ...:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 04:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: W2k Sp3 is out
Nothing mentioned on the Microsoft pages, but
Hehehe, we cheated, we put all our stuff in a UUNET Data Centre. I have
no sleepless nights about UPS or temperature:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 01:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related
We
Lol! You can't have everything you know
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 01:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related
and sleepless nights about bankruptcy?
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van
Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related
no way, I'm way to much of a control freak for that. I wanted the
systems
to page our on call pager 1st, but was voted down by all the others
involved. What type of SLA do you have with UUNET?
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar
into a faster
port, preferably one that is closer to the Internet? :0
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 8:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related
Oh but I'm a control freak too! We're in the same
if I had that kind of setup, I would
probably
use it as well.
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 8:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related
Oh but I'm a control freak too! We're in the same
I don't think that there is something like that coded in, but you could
probably use a script.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Vas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 July 2002 10:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: question about attachments
Dear All
Just a quick question...
Is
several weeks ago - it is not pretty.
John J. Steniger
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 9:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas
It's mostly a business call. Hard drive space is cheap
I suspect a Murphy rather than a real bug, but I'm unable to send as
a public folder (nor a Distribution List). The error in outlook states:
You do not have the permission to send the message on behalf of the
user. I do have the send as box ticked. I have checked and double
checked the rights,
?
Heiko
--
-- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073
-- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472
-- ITALY
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 11:39 AM
.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073
-- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472
-- ITALY
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 11:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public
Make sure you have a ptr record for your mail server in your DNS.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Olivier de Heer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 July 2002 08:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Fix reverse DNS (?)
Dear All,
Some of our customers do receive the following NDR
Good morning all
Exchange 2000 SP1. I had a corruption on one of my EDB files and had to
recreate the STM file. At the time it looked like no mail was lost, but
alas, this was not true. Outlook now still reports mail items that can't
be opened. Error: Can not open this item Checked Event logs -
corruption. Run it until you get 0 errors, 0 warnings, and
0 fixes or the same results twice.
Isinteg -s servername -fix -test alltests
Jeff Beckham
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:49 AM
Posted To: Exchange
!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sander Van
Butzelaar
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Reported emails not available after STM recreation and EDB
corruption
Good morning all
Exchange 2000 SP1. I had
How nice, messaging support according to this OOF from Colin Camilleri.
I hope Alan knows what's coming his way!...:-)
Hi,
I am no longer working for HP. Please contact Alan Fraser for any Mail
and Messaging issues.
thanks and regards,
Colin
How much you are needed? How much work you really need to do or how many
$$$'s they think you are worth:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 June 2002 09:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange engineer needed!!!
how
Stuur drop asb!...:-)
Sander - Kaapstad
-Original Message-
From: Willigen, Maarten van [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 June 2002 12:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
I am in Amsterdam Holland
Maarten
-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart
Cape Town - South Africa, here the leased lines change into jungle beat
concerts once you are outside the city. One bang is a 0 and two bangs a
1. You need a keen ear and a fast hand to type.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 June 2002
Morning Admins
I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my
Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store does not mount, nor
can I restore my backup bkf file as I get an error: Information Store
(2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error -1811. I
Discussions
Subject: RE: STM Question
Eseutil /p databasename.edb /createstm
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: STM Question
Subject: STM Question
Morning
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: STM Question
Did you lose any mail?
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM
opened
by a MAPI client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: STM Question
Not that I can see. As soon as we were back lots
September... any takers yes, no...Sold to the gent with the funny
hat...Oh, sorry mam...
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 May 2002 02:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?
July
-Original Message-
From: Stephen
Without sounding too nasty:Why do people care when it comes out? Unless
you have a serious problem and than you should talk to PPS anyway
climbing off my soap box. Sander
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 April 2002 09:07
To: Exchange Discussions
the biggest car, fastest computer
and
the newest service packs.
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
--
- Original Message -
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
May they need to be paid?
-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 April 2002 03:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5
upgrade isp services.. is there a wizard for that ? :-}
-Original Message-
From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL
I like keeping Exchange logs at least until I run a full backup ...:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 April 2002 09:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: best practice
Hi,
looking for some advice on what to do with exchange logs,
Will depend on your local environment. Possible - yes. Acceptable -
depends. I prefer a Raid set up, but again for 5 users IDE will do etc
etc.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: wade robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 April 2002 01:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Human Electric? Cool, so the Matrix is true! Humans running on
electricity sorry got carried away here. So what was the question
again?
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Adebayo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
So what happens to the new emails when the real server is down, does the
test server except them? This would result in a loss of emails when the
real server comes back onb I agree with Louis here, get the test
server on a different physical network.
Sander
-Original Message-
Yep, make the original incoming address a D/L and one recipient of the
D/L is a contact (you guessed itit, it will be the email address of your
mdeamon, so it will get a copy of the incoming email)
Have fun
Sander Van Butzelaar, MCSA MCSE
Administrator
KORBI.NET
http://www.korbi.net
Never let
). I want that my exchange 2000 server forward it locally, Is
their a way to that.
Regards,
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Auto Responder
Yep, make
Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Auto Responder
They only way Exchange is going to forward anything is through SMTP. So
what do you mean by locally? You do not need an internet
Ah Barry, but a little bit further it says:
Do not withhold good from those to whom it is due, when it is in your
power to do so. Proverbs 3:27
So let the man have his messages, I think they are good:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
LOL! (s'pose that means I'm in, otherwise I would be out, right?)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange digest: March 07, 2002
I'll be IN the office all next week,
Sander Van Butzelaar, MCSA MCSE
Administrator
KORBI.NET
http://www.korbi.net
Never let a human do the work of a machine - The Matrix
-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: An Active/Active
netbios-ns 137/tcpnbname #NETBIOS Name Service
netbios-ns 137/udpnbname #NETBIOS Name Service
137/UDP -- NetBIOS Name Server
The network basic input/output system (NetBIOS) Name Server (NBNS)
protocol, which is part of the NetBIOS over TCP/IP (NetBT) family of
protocols,
I got it from our TAM a while back when I was looking for it, so I
presume you would contact your local PPS and they will post it to you.
All documentation points to the resource kit for Exchange 2000, but I
have never been able to find it in there-(
Sander
-Original Message-
In Exchange 2000 you can limit the number of recipients on the
Properties/Messages page of your virtual SMTP connector. That would mean
the total number of recipients per message, not per TO: and per CC:
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
That is why it looks so silly when a person puts the alphabet soup (esp.
MCSE) after his/her name and asks the group why you need an MX record,
why Exchange 5.5 Admin will not run on his Windows 98 workstation and my
personal favorite, can I delete all these funny log files that take up
so much
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
