If there are problems with the RUS, generally you will see the errors
while the System Attendant starts (because this is the process that
manages the RUS). When troubleshooting RUS problems I generally only need
to work with one RUS from the domain that is having the problems to see
where the
PST = Bad.
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 9:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2003 backups
Hi,
I have just moved from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2003.
It is a single server setup.
I
access to email from 2 years ago ?
yes, they do need to access these.
What do other organisations do ?
Matt
--
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Molkentin
Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 10:30 AM
To: Exchange
-
From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted
At: Thursday, January 08, 2004 5:56 PM Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Exchange 2003 backups
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups
PST's can have passwords put on them by users, and users
forget them (rendering them useless).
PST's do
do other organisations do ?
Matt
--
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Molkentin
Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Steve Molkentin
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups
PST's can have passwords put on them by users, and users
forget them (rendering them useless).
PST's do
Dude, STFU.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics
First, you have no credibility on the point. You find the
phrase I finish
Given our current message volume.
I'm sure we all remember these...
http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame1.html
--steve
PS: Dude, STFU.
Steve Hanna
Network/Systems Administrator
Niagara Plumbing Supply Company Ltd.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is nothing common about
You don't understand the definition of spam
so I suggest that you may also STFU.
--steve
-Original Message-
From: Troels Majlandt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 3:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SV: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics
Dude, STFU
--steve
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 7:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
People mis-characterize and read things into my posts
Dude, STFU.
--steve
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
I will state this again for the 11 millionth and 1 time now. Accepting
direct
Dude, STFU.
--steve
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 12:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Titles are priceless.
Ethics are about avoiding real
Dude, STFU
--steve
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Yes, really. Laws are designed to define the floor. Ethics
are designed
Dude, STFU.
--steve
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 3:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Yes, we did a phenomenal job for Marathon and Microsoft, without or
knowledge
IIS environment (shame on you if you have not).
From what I can tell...a very solid product. I would guess that with
Novell picking up Suse as well...things should get very interesting in the
distant future for the desktop environment.
Best regards,
Steve
Novell connects Linux desktop users
. Although this
method is a good way to find out who does.
Steve Evans
SDSU Foundation
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 5:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Single Use E-Mail?
I dont
the real trick would be to use something like OWA to see if the new
objects you created resolve\show up there.
Yes, but the only users using that are on Exchange 2003.=20
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Sent: Tuesday, December
You would not be using Outlook 2003 in cached mode would you?
Exchange 2k sp3
I have a weird problem with my exchange 2000 RUS. When I create a new
Distribution Group and let the RUS do its thing, the group doesn't show
up in the default GAL. Even though the RUS stamped it with all the
a rough time figuring out
why. My environment is a native Exchange 2003\Windows 2003 environment
(inplace upgraded). Has anyone else seen this or have a suggestion on
something that I might try or check?
Thanks,
Steve
_
List posting FAQ
Which version of Outlook? If it's Outlook 2003 in cached mode it's
because Outlook is using a OAB, which is only updated by default once a
night.
Steve Evans
SDSU Foundation
-Original Message-
From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 2:45 PM
To: Exchange
doh!
It is Friday right?
Thanks Steve
Which version of Outlook? If it's Outlook 2003 in cached mode it's
because Outlook is using a OAB, which is only updated by default once a
night.=20
Steve Evans
SDSU Foundation
-Original Message-
From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
this? If
I let all the messages download, when he reconnects to the domain, will he
get duplicates?
Thanks,
Steve Cobb
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin
One approach you might want to consider is educating your
users about the use of Personal Folders.
Then, educate yourself about all the problems you will have with
PST's... Remember, PST = bad.
themolk.
_
List posting FAQ:
to
run eseutil.
How much space are you going to reclaim if you do?
-Original Message-
From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2K Outlook 2K3 - increase in size of *.stm
All advice
I have used Tumbleweed's SecureMail in a 100,000+ seat Exchange shop and I
can certainly vouch for them. Solid product with top notch performance.
It backends on SQL, which allows for some pretty nifty stuff that you can
do as an admin (assuming you know SQL...always a good time to learn). Out
All advice appreciated...
We have recently introduced Outlook 2K3 into our Exchange 2000
environment. Our laptop users we have configured to run Outlook in
cached exchange mode.
In the same time frame, our *.stm has exploded from about 1.5 GB to
approx 9GB. The *.edb file has not grown (apart
Ouch.,
--steve
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Password Mainenance
No.
We have always manually created the passwords in the past and
kept a list.
Doesn't make
Yes, we are using brick level backups.
Steve Iadarola
Senior Support Specialist
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you saying that you are using brick-level backups
?
Any help or thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
Steve Iadarola
Senior Support Specialist
Information Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
65 Hayden Ave
Lexington, MA 02421
_
List posting FAQ: http
would
really like to stick with the exclude from backups if it is available.
Steve Iadarola
Senior Support Specialist
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What I would do is make a
separate storage group for those
Has nothing to do with saving any money on backups.
Steve Iadarola
Senior Support Specialist
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http
Larry = pst = bad.
themolk.
P.S. I wish he was the M:\ drive...
-Original Message-
From: Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 17 October 2003 7:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: RE: Just Released - Digital Cable Descrambler 3899
UNLOCK Digital Cable - FREE!
problems with this change (and the fact it was
forced on all Trend customers without making it some sort of option) and I
have told Trend my feelings about itÂ….but I am but a single voice.
Anyhow...now you know if you did not before.
Enjoy,
Steve
know if you did not before.
Enjoy,
Steve
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe
MailScanner with SpamAssassin.
Steve Evans
SDSU Foundation
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 8:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations
They didn't rank very high in Network World's
that you require).
-Steve
I'm looking for a new AV gateway product. I'm looking for something that
has the following features. Right now we use NAI Websheild SMTP gateway
which does a pretty good job but is getting rather dated and it does not
appear that this program will updated past its 4.5
Is there an easy way to get the total number of mailboxes I have in the
organization across multiple servers? Is there a utility that I can run
against the servers? Just looking for a total number of mailboxes without
counting them all manually?
TIA,
Steve
Steve Iadarola
Senior Support
Sorry, Exch 2000.
Steve Iadarola
Senior Support Specialist
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 2:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to find total number of mailboxes
That was the issue. Thanks.
Steve
Steve Iadarola
Senior Support Specialist
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 5:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Delegate Sent on behalf
Group. Anyone have any
thoughts?
TIA
Steve Iadarola
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe
Not sure. I will check with them in the morning.
Thanks,
Steve Iadarola
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 5:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Delegate Sent on behalf of is not being displaying
Are you sure
I'm a big fan of the fact that it is an EXTREMELY BUSINESS
TRANSACTION. ;)
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: jerry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 26 September 2003 10:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: forward for a transaction
FROM DESK OF:MR.JERRY JOSEPH.
Matt,
What does this have to do with the thread in place? Perhaps if you want
help you need to send a new e-mail so that a new thread starts (or
continue the thread this started on)??
I know those that will want to help will find it easier if this is the
case.
My $0.02 (inc GST).
themolk.
Yeah but that's not necessarily because it was a SAN. If you double the
number of disks the databases are on for example your going to see a
performance increase, whether it's DAS or SAN.
Steve Evans
SDSU Foundation
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Mark Twain said: Put all your eggs in one basket, and watch that
basket. Seriously though if you have good SAN hardware, the uptime on
that equipment is amazing. You have to remember that everything is
redundant.
Steve Evans
SDSU Foundation
-Original Message-
From: Dean Cunningham
Ditto from an Aussie...
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 22 September 2003 8:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: A CHALLENGE to the List
I see the 10 to 12 looks like its gone, but I would be happy
to accept
. It
will be interesting to see how quickly Exchange and iSCSI come along.
Steve Evans
SDSU Foundation
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange and SAN
I thought NetApp only made NAS boxes
It doesn't, but it keeps people from reusing credentials. At least I
believe that's the posters point.
Steve Evans
SDSU Foundation
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA front
Where does AD say the mailbox is? Has c run on the old database lately?
Steve Evans
SDSU Foundation
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Duncan Scott
Subject: Mailbox moves completed
Tony,
If you agree with Andy, then why not do something about it and CHANGE
THE SUBJECT?!
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 16 September 2003 9:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
I
Glenn,
I have seen this exact issue as well and the SIS hotfix does resolve it
(after applying it and then running ISINTEG on each DB). When you run
ISINTEG without the fix it will temporarily resolve the discrepancy
between the real mailbox size and what is reported (thus the sudden
mailbox
It does. You list it as a file in a file filter, then don't check the
box that says block (or something along those lines)
Steve Evans
SDSU Foundation
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 12:07 PM
To: Exchange
That's absolutely right - to quote the Great Ed...
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioural problems
A length of 2x4 is hardly technological, and supremely satisfying
wielded in the hands of a frustrated IT admin. Win - Win!
themolk.
-Original Message-
From:
and anti-virus scanning service are good, the outbound
mail has been very unreliable and we've actually moved our outbound back
to our gateway SMTP servers as a result. Technical support has been poor
as well.
TIA for any comments.
Steve
. I
don't believe they offer an outbound solution.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Messagelabs. Postini, etc..
Hello all,
I wonder if those of you that have
Thanks for the reply, Raj. Are you letting your users control their own
spam settings (I believe that Postini offers this), or do you control it
company-wide?
Thanks again,
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:03 AM
administration which has turned out
to be a myth with Messagelabs. I've used the Postfix in the past and
will take a look at SpamAssasin again.
Thanks for the reply!
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:38 AM
To: Exchange
We have Messagelabs - NAV for Gateways - NAV for Exchange - NAV
Corporate on the desktops.
Seems to work well as we've never had a virus reach one of the desktops.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 7:39 AM
When I was a messaging consultant I worked for a very large oil company
(well over 100k seats) that had scanning done on the SMTP gateways and on
the desktop, but nothing on the Exchange side (something like 120 e2k
servers). From what I remember they had not had a email born virus
like the advise
ask for a refund[1]
[1] This was a quote sorry I can't remember who first made the statement.
--steve
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 10:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Services
I have to admit that Trend does tend to be the better product out there
(from what I have heard and seen). I know Groupshield at a VERY intimate
level (more then I would like to admit on this list) and I would recommend
staying away from it personally. One thing to point out about Trend (and
any
anymore.
When I try to start the MMC for IIS I get an error cannot connect to mail
the data is invalid
Thoughts
--steve
Steve Hanna
Network/Systems Administrator
Niagara Plumbing Supply Company Ltd.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is nothing common about sense
Bob,
Its all about IIS. That is the easiest way to remember it. Exchange 2000
cannot run on IIS 6.0, but Exchange 2003 can run on IIS 5.0.
-Steve
What? I thought it was the other way around?
OK, for those in the know, please clear this up. You upgrade Exchange
first, then OS? Or OS
I do not believe you can install Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003. Windows
2003 runs IIS 6.0, which Exchange 2000 does not support. On the other
hand Exchange 2003 can run on IIS 5.0. So the proper upgrade path is
upgrade Exchange 2000 first and then upgrade the OS to Windows 2003.
Thanks,
Steve
Jamie,
As I understand it, Forestprep is only meant to be run on a Windows 2000
domain...
I am happy to be wrong, however.
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: Jamie Domingue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 1 August 2003 2:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Greetings,
I
are running Windows 2000 SP3 or Windows Server 2003 Active
Directory.
So there is no requirement for AD to be hosted on a Win2003 box. The
requirement to install Exchange 2003 first on a particular box is because
Exchange 2000 does not work with IIS 6.0.
-Steve
The real reason is that 2003 AD
Ok...I'm nitpickingbut just so the terminology is right...doesn't
really store attachments as a file anywhere, but stores the data in a
database with multiple pointers (if multiple people received the message).
Best regards,
Steve
Hi,
I get asked this all the time and really have never
Erick,
I believe what you are looking for is on the properties of the SMTP
Virutal server in ESM. Go to the Messages tab and there is a field on
the bottom titled Forward all mail with unresolved recipients to host:.
Thanks,
Steve
I am in the process of moving from an SMTP/POP system
Chris,
Thanks for the response. I checked, and no, the user doesn't have mail
delivered to a PST. The only PST in use is ARCHIVE.PST. Mail goes
straight to the users' mailbox on exchange.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25
This would query your AD server for all entries that would be in the GAL
and dump the returned objects DN and their displayname.
Enjoy,
Steve
I am trying to export a list of all my users that have an active mailbox
that is visable with the GAL. Is there a tool or resource that could
assist
Ditto... Particularly if this is the integration of Entourage to use an
Exchange server properly!
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 31 July 2003 1:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I'd be interested in hearing about it as
If you are using Sendmail as your message relay you could use
greylisting. I have seen it work very well in a number of places...even
large shops.
http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron
Joe,
When you restart the SA are there any errors generated? If the RUS is
going to spit out any initialization errors...this is when you would see
them (learned this the hard way when I put a RUS on a mailbox server
that also hosted over 5000 mailboxes a year or so ago). Initialization
errors
the workstation for viruses and found none.
3) Searched MS's knowledgebase and read anything I could find on
canceled meetings.
4) Tried starting Outlook with the /celanfreebusy and /cleanreminders
switches.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions!
Steve
Open ESM and browse to the SMTP VS of the server that receives inbound SMTP (or the
SMTP VS to which you want the filter to be applied to) and open the properties of the
SMTP VS. On the General Tab, next to the IP address: field there is an Advanced
button. Click that and then select the
this??
I am just angry...
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2003 8:14 AM
To: Steve Molkentin
Subject: Re: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}
I use EMail Stamps to curb the flow of unwanted junk e-mail
Discussions
LOL. I think it's hysterical.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Molkentin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 6:16 PM
Subject: FW: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}
I know we discussed
meeting the requirement to transmit it securely over
the Internet).
Best regards,
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 1:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail over
Is NetBIOS still enabled on the LAN connection facing the clients?
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 July 2003 15:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k
Go into your OUTLOOK client and change the connection from
Why not store the voice mail messages in public folders (each person
gets their own of course) that live on a dedicated pf store for vm and
set a different type of backup schedule for that pf store? You could
also set up the folders so that they delete any messages in the folders
that are over
Could not hurt to verify that RPC is working correctly using something
like rpings. You could also configured a client that is normally having
problems to used IMAP or POP and see if it goes awaycould be the VPN
having problems with RPCs.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
18, 2003 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco
Uni fied Messaging
Cisco won't authenticate to a PF. It requires a mailbox.
-Original Message-
From: Presley, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:33
Gurus,
Ex2K - Native mode
I have a mail enabled public folder (calendar) for a meeting room that I
can e-mail when booking a meeting to ensure it is booked. This works,
however it only tentatively accepts the meeting request.
Some questions:
- Can (and how, if so) can I get it to auto accept
Norbu
Can you connect if you manually dial using dial-up networking to the local
ISP, then use Outlook [in case it is an Outlook-DUN interconnection
problem]?
Cheers
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 July 2003 12:38
To: Exchange
Boyz [do any of you have a real name?]
Is the exchange server behind a firewall, preventing access via the
internet?
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 July 2003 13:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up
I seem to be involved in a bit of philosophical debate and want to get
opinions from the field on this.
Basically, I have some service mailboxes that I would prefer not to run
on regular mailbox servers. These particular mailboxes do not hold any
email, they are simply needed for the cirictal
Nope - that's just Andy. Up there with Martin Ed as far as I am
concerned when it comes to knowing their stuff.
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 3 July 2003 8:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid
Carmila,
It's the international dateline - every time you send an e-mail to a
group across it, it attaches the winmail.dat file so that when it is
opened, it is read in the local time zone (and reflects that).[1]
themolk.
[1] Complete BS - but I couldn't help but throw it out there.
it. :)
-Original Message-
From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 5:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Carmila,
It's the international dateline - every time you send an
e-mail to a group across it, it attaches the winmail.dat file
so that when it is opened
You forgot one... Tupperware = 100%
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 27 June 2003 1:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam
Death and Taxes = 100%
-Original Message-
From:
Peter,
That said, the latest on the Spammunition website is to suggest he is
changing the logic so that there is no need to manually rescan.
I agree the errors are frustrating - but the product is not bad for free
for a client.
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter
Raji,
From my memory, the outlook bar shortcuts are stored in the user's
profile (in application data local settings (I think)). To specify a
folder to start up in, go to: Tools Options Other Advanced options
- but I think it only allows to specify the big 7 (inbox, calendar,
etc).
I hope
Currently running Exchange 5.5 on a Win NT 4.0 Server. Have just
purchased a new Hardware platform for it. Compaq DL380 G3. Want to build
the new server running WIN2000, but still want to remain using Exchange
5.5. I know 5.5 will run on 2000 but my dilema is that I want to build
the new box
Why not put a link as the disclaimer? E.g.:
signature
Steve Molkentin
BSES
Phone, fax,etc
http://www.bses.org.au/legal.html (there is no link here, just an
example)
/signature
I just thought this might save 50 lines of crap in an e-mail... The
person has been made aware of the legality
What about Klingon and Elvish? Google is available in both, so people
must speak it. Should we not then make disclaimers available in these
languages too?
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 19 June 2003 12:13 AM
To: Exchange
an electronic message that was sent to them by
mistake. And
those disclaimers that try to shift the burden of
responiblity from the shoulders of the sender to the reciever
are a sad attempt at just that.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 13:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Brick level backups - legal
For those interested souls...
http://www.thecouriermail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,6619047%2
55E8362,00.html
(link may wrap - but I hope not).
themolk.
_
List posting FAQ:
Ex2K3 sp1
;)
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 8:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: MS Purchase
totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . .
Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV
Sorry william - rtm? Not read the manual?
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 8:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MS Purchase
Exchange 2000 RTM.
- Original Message -
From: Steve
1 - 100 of 311 matches
Mail list logo
