I thought I read where you must run Forest and Domain prep prior to
installing ADC.
From: Milt Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ADC Connector issue
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:57:08 -0500
We have
Already way past that point ... it completed without any errors ...
From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ADC Connector issue
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:23:19 -0400
I thought I read where you
You'll have to install the exchange admin tools on your local machine.
-Original Message-
From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADC Additions to the Schema
I'm working here on migrating our organization from
You must run Setup.
Choose custom on the first line.
Install Admin Tools.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy
Sent:
, January 07, 2003 11:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep
Right, the one from the SP3 CD. And also from the same CD
later you'll
want to run:
update.exe /ForestPrep
and
update.exe /DomainPrep
as opposed from running it from the RTM CD.
Ed
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 08 January 2003 12:01
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep
Subject: RE: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep
So there are updates to the schema in SP3?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr
Not really, except that prior to adding an E2K server into a 55 site, you
could configure your mbx, cr and dl agreements to be one-way only which
would mean you could remove the AD accounts/contacts/DGs that it creates
without affecting your 55 environment.
Even in 2-way mode you have the option
:RE: ADC connector for 5.5
One thought is to use a tool to migrate your users to the AD Domain first
using a tool that migrates them and populates SID History so they can access
mail with their old account.
Jim Collins
Sr. Systems Engineer
Competitive Computing, Inc.
www.competitive.com
Use the ADC on the latest SP for E2K.
- Original Message -
From: Walden H. Leverich III [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 10:47 AM
Subject: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep
As step one of a 5.5 to E2K upgrade I'm looking to install the
: Monday, January 06, 2003 11:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC connector for 5.5
...or upgrade the domain into the new forest.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message
in Latin seems profound.)
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep
Before you setup any connection agreements, read, re-read and then
re-re-read
problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep
Use the ADC on the latest SP for E2K.
- Original Message -
From
Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:07 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep
Subject: Re: ADC for 5.5 to E2K prep
Use the ADC on the latest SP for E2K.
- Original Message -
From: Walden H
: Mike Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 5:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC connector for 5.5
One of the Exchange servers in my site is in a different domain. and when I
upgrade the Exchange server in my domain to E2K it creates disabled users in
my domain
06, 2003 6:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC connector for 5.5
One thought is to use a tool to migrate your users to the AD Domain
first using a tool that migrates them and populates SID History so they
can access mail with their old account.
Jim Collins
Sr. Systems Engineer
I haven't seen any situations that require a configuration like this. Why do
you want to go to that level of detail?
Jim Collins
Sr. Systems Engineer
Competitive Computing, Inc.
www.competitive.com
-Original Message-
From: Mike Newell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 03,
I think you should be able to modify the properties of the CA using
ADSIEdit. The attribute should be msExchServer2ExportContainer, and you'd
enter the LDAP path to the specific server's Recipients container.
Check Microsoft Exchange 2000 Infrastructure Design ISBN 182451 for
more information
.
Any thoughts? I know I don't explain myself very well so if you have other
questions let me know.
Thanks again,
Mike.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: ADC
Well when you upgraded both domains, did you make the second domain a child
domain?
- Original Message -
From: Mike Newell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 5:08 PM
Subject: RE: ADC connector for 5.5
One of the Exchange servers
Discussions
Subject:Re: ADC connector for 5.5
Well when you upgraded both domains, did you make the second domain a child
domain?
- Original Message -
From: Mike Newell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 5:08 PM
Subject: RE
ORG-SITE-SERVERS-RECIPIENTS isn't a real recipient. It's sort of
like an address book view. That's why what you want isn't supported;
the data is not organized that way. ADC works directory-to-directory.
I've read your other posts in this thread, and it's clear that you're
not really
IIRC, Add/remove programs, if it's not there then look in the active
directory sites and services. Server, services, ADC server name, delete
key.
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
the empty
ADC.
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC Delete
IIRC, Add/remove programs, if it's not there then look in the active
directory sites and services
Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey
Edwards
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC Delete
I have deleted all the Exchange Settings in site and services for this
site
Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 12:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC Delete
Your mistake was deleting the last Exchange 5.5 server using Sites and
Services. You should have used the old Exchange 5.5 Administrator
and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey
Edwards
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC Delete
I did remove the 5.5 Server through the 5.5 Administrator. (It is not
our
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 12:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC Delete
The last in the site is what matters. And I sure looks like in your first
post you said you deleted it using AD Sites and Services, but the grammar is
unclear so you must have meant
10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC Delete
I deleted the ADC for the decommissioned Server in Sites and Services,
which should have removed it from the ADC Services. So what remains is
a shell for the ADC in ADC Services (not to be confused with ADC Sites
and Services).
Gèoff
No. I still have 8 other ADC running and one empty ADC with no CAs that I
am now trying to remove from the ADC Services.
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC Delete
Did you remove the ADC software?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC Delete
Ed:
I did not understand what you were saying when I first read your
post. However, I did finally realize what you were trying to say. I
appreciate your help.
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL
Microsoft Exchange 2000 Infrastructure Design
ISBN: 182451
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADC Connector
I believe this may have been covered close to a zillion
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC Connector
Microsoft Exchange 2000 Infrastructure Design
ISBN: 182451
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL
it won't
only slightly
no
yes
NO!
- Original Message -
From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 6:30 PM
Subject: ADC and mixed mode
Dear All
I need to take my exchange 55 server offline to re install a backup
Make you wish you can rescan the scsi bus without doing a reinstall/restart.
MS is getting close but not quite there yet.
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: ADC
Do you have multiple domain controllers? Maybe they are not replicating well?
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 5:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC Synching
Okay, with one answer, I will post
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 9:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC Synching
Do you have multiple domain controllers? Maybe they are not replicating
well?
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002
For one, you would lose your single instance. Not sure how important
this is for you.
M pie, it's nearly lunch time here...
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 September 2002 11:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge
PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 September 2002 11:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC vs. Exmerge
Not too important. We only have 1 site. If I exmerge, do I not get all
the
rich Exchange info tacked onto the user accounts?
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi,
When I moved to a new 2000 server, I exported the Public Folders to PST's and
all of the permission/ownership setting were lost.
But I don't know if that is normal, or if I did something wrong.
AW
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, you wrote:
Hi,
We have about a 850 mailboxes and a 10 GB
I've moved quite a few organisations from 5.5 to 2000, and I've stuck
with the ADC and the move-mailbox method. This has also included some
dodgy 5.5 installations.
Clean up the 5.5 install before the migration; delete unwanted
connectors, mailboxes, public folders, etc. Also, as part of the
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC vs. Exmerge
I've moved quite a few organisations from 5.5 to 2000, and I've stuck
with the ADC and the move-mailbox method. This has also included some
dodgy 5.5 installations.
Clean up the 5.5 install before the migration; delete unwanted
connectors
I had no problems with ADC. Synched the directories and PFs and then moved the
mailboxes over, the natural way - right-click/Exchange Tasks/Move mailbox. It worked
beautifully. But you have to know what you are doing when you are working with ADC.
Nice thing is that ADC preserves permissions
ExMerge will not destroy all your rich Exchange info. But your storage may balloon
tremendously.
-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 5:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC vs. Exmerge
Not too important. We
Yeah ADC makes you want to learn ADSI Edit :)
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 6:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC vs. Exmerge
I once heaved a couple of hundred users between two exchange servers
This is normal occurrence.
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 6:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: ADC vs. Exmerge
Hi,
When I moved to a new 2000 server, I exported the Public Folders to PST's and
all
I would say use ExMerge as a last resort, if you can't move some mailbox(es) using the
natural way for some reason.
-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 7:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC vs. Exmerge
,
it tells me that the prerequisites for un-installation are not met because there is
no such object on the server.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 6:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC vs. Exmerge
I've
Nope it happened to me tooreal pain in the ass to set those all back
up
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Allison M.
Wittstock
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 3:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: ADC vs. Exmerge
Hi
a few seconds, maybe a minute
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADC Synching
Environment: Running in mixed mode, Exchange 5.5, SP4 on Win2k, SP2. E2k,
SP3 on Wink2k,
: RE: ADC Synching
a few seconds, maybe a minute
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADC Synching
Environment: Running in mixed mode, Exchange 5.5, SP4 on Win2k, SP2. E2k
Design goal?
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADC question
I was thinking of creating 1 ADC for our entire org. We have 4 sites.
Could I create 1 ADC to pull from 3 of
:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC question\
Personalmail
Design goal?
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADC question
I was thinking of creating 1 ADC for our
Q270480 and Q256862.
-Original Message-
From: Jon Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 July 2002 17:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADC issue
One of my VIP users has two 5.5 mailboxes--the primary one that everyone
sends mail to and a private one for who knows what. The
the service. Did the trick.
Thanks for getting me started.
-Original Message-
From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 4:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC issue
Q270480 and Q256862
Might it not be easier to rename the two accounts?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jon Hill
Sent: Wednesday, July 10,
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 1:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC issue
Might it not be easier to rename the two accounts?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups
Yup. Quite easy Norman.
Check out Kieran McCorry's article in Exchange Administrator at
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm
It's instant doc id - 19712
-Original Message-
From: Patterson, Norman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June 2002 11:55
To: Exchange Discussions
: 14 June 2002 12:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC changing Common Name
Yup. Quite easy Norman.
Check out Kieran McCorry's article in Exchange Administrator at
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm
It's instant doc id - 19712
-Original Message-
From: Patterson, Norman
What is it that you need to know specifically Karen?
What are you looking at the ADC to perform for you?
The ADC will create new AD objects or associate current AD objects and
associate them with Exchange DS objects (users, custom recipients, public
folders etc).
Alec
We're doing a design for a large enterprise. One particular business
unit (2500 people in size) has an antagonistic relationship with the
parent and is leaning towards their own W2K forest and Exchange Org.
However, the mandate from above says that there needs to be unified
messaging, which
Why not have a single forest with multiple domains for the different
divisions
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Karen McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 May 2002 12:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: ADC as Inter-Org Connector/Sync
We're doing
not have a single forest with multiple domains for the different
divisions
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Karen McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 May 2002 12:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: ADC as Inter-Org Connector/Sync
We're
, May 10, 2002 8:24 AM
Subject: RE: ADC as Inter-Org Connector/Sync
Why not have a single forest with multiple domains for the different
divisions
Yours,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Karen McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 May 2002 12:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Well, using the ADC as an interorg tool I don't believe you are going to get
PFs to replicate , nor calendar data. However, having Domain accounts in a
separate forest from where the Exchange servers exist is a supported
configuration... Then all they'd have to worry about is e-mail policies
to track
down the cause of various errors.
Thanks
Russell
-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 8:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC as Inter-Org Connector/Sync
Why not have a single forest with multiple domains
If the relationship is that bad then how is it that the mothership can
still enforce the need for a single email address. That is an example of
an enterprise admin saying this is the way it should be. To me that is no
different than being part of the same forest/domain.
Next time the mothership
Sure...it works swell in an environment with one domain and 2 servers...
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [Ed] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 7:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADC
Is it just me or is this ADC software very well written, I am very
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC
Sure...it works swell in an environment with one domain and 2 servers...
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [Ed] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 7:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADC
Is it just me or is this ADC
Size does matter in this case.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [Ed] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 7:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC
Are you calling me small time?
--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca
Wider is better.
Original message
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 07:48:15 -0700
From: Baker, Jennifer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ADC
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Size does matter in this case.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [Ed] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
, 2002 8:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC
LOL! ROTFL!
Oh my aching side
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [Ed] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 7:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADC
Is it just me or is this ADC software very well
Install the ADC first (but don't create any connection agreements at
this point).
And use the ADC that's supplied with SP2.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 09 April 2002 15:18
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: ADC Ex5.5
No you dont...
--Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald
B.
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 7:18 AM
To: Exchange
OK, if no connection agreements, then how do you get your mailbox's, custom
recipents and
Dist list to update the AD?
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC Ex5.5 to W2K
: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 09 April 2002 15:38
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: ADC Ex5.5 to W2K
Subject: RE: ADC Ex5.5 to W2K
OK, if no connection agreements, then how do you get your mailbox's,
custom recipents and Dist list to update the AD?
Ron
then can install
my
first E2K system - join current Ex.5.5 site and begin to move mailbox's,
etc.etc.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC Ex5.5 to W2K
You do that AFTER
2002 16:08
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: ADC Ex5.5 to W2K
Subject: RE: ADC Ex5.5 to W2K
So, if I understand correctly: For Ex.5.5 to AD
1. Install ADC from E2K sp2 CD. ( no connection agreements - yet) 2.
Run ForestPrep 3. Run DomainPrep 4. Establish connection agreements
(two
Insert Message from EVP Chief Security Officer
Is there any strategy or tools that can alert us, as to unauthorized access
to mail boxes?
Insert End
I currently have diagnostic logging enabled on security and it fills the
logs with 1016's everytime anyone does anything to someone elses
they
are used to ACL a PF. Check the event log on the Exchange Box though for
any failures in this process.
Rgrds
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 22:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC Public Folders
The customer
The ADC is hard coded to create a Universal Distribution Group, so this
is normal. The reason you need a native mode domain is so that when the
store.exe process tries to upgrade the distribution group to a security
group, the process will actually succeed (since USGs can only exist in a
native
Could you not create a child domain that is Native?
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 08:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC Public Folders
The ADC is hard coded to create a Universal Distribution
Group, so
]]
Posted At: 26 March 2002 11:25
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: ADC Public Folders
Subject: RE: ADC Public Folders
Could you not create a child domain that is Native?
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 08:19
To: Exchange
IIRC, only after you've actually installed the Exchange 2000 server into
the 5.5 site, e.g. you could install the ADC, perform ForestPrep and
join the 5.5 site, then create the ordinary ADC connection agreements,
and the Config CA still won't be there at that point.
Neil Hobson
Silversands
-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 13:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC - Config Entry
Sensitivity: Confidential
IIRC, only after you've actually installed the Exchange 2000 server into
the 5.5 site, e.g. you could install the ADC, perform ForestPrep
Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC - Config Entry
Sensitivity: Confidential
IIRC, only after you've actually installed the Exchange 2000 server into
the 5.5 site, e.g. you could install the ADC, perform ForestPrep and
join the 5.5 site, then create the ordinary ADC connection agreements,
and the Config
March 2002 13:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC - Config Entry
Sensitivity: Confidential
IIRC, only after you've actually installed the Exchange 2000 server into
the 5.5 site, e.g. you could install the ADC, perform ForestPrep and
join the 5.5 site, then create the ordinary ADC
-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 14:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: ADC - Config Entry
That's not ADC; did you join them to the site during install? It should have
prompted for the name of the 5.5 server and the service account/password
Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:16 AM
Subject: RE: ADC - Config Entry
Yes, first time. I ended up having to un-install exchange 2000, then
re-install at a later date. It did not ask me a second time when I
re-installed, not that I undid the forest prep domain prep, I
: Re: ADC - Config Entry
That part of installation is no different than 5.5's installation; if it
didn't ask you for the name of an existing 5.5 server, then the
username/pass, you somehow skipped the screen that asks if you want to
join the site.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL
Are you able to create a new SRS using Exchange System Manager? see Q255285
This will create a Config CA for your site.
Rgrds
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 14:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC - Config
Subject: RE: ADC - Config Entry
It sounds more like he had a Config CA first time round, but
uninstalling Exchange 2000 removed it (which I guess it would, since
that process would remove the SRS?) My question is whether the Config
CA would be re-created when you reinstall Exchange 2000? Never tried
our time and effort suggesting.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 16:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC - Config Entry
Yes, sounds like it. It assumed a new site and did not ask
me. If I try
and create
of the order of problems and installation.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 16:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC - Config Entry
Have you tried the steps in the following?
XADM: Exchange 2000 Won't Install Properly
It isn't just Public Folders permissions assigned to a distribution list
but also nested distribution list. Right?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
That's fine. Exchange alias and User ID are different attributes in AD
too.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, March 22, 2002 4:33 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: ADC
Subject: ADC
I am in the process of
You don't have any choice. You must install the ADC prior to installing
Exchange 2000 into an existing Exchange 5.5 organization.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC on Exchange2k SP2 disk
Why wouldn't you install the latest service pack on the server?
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
The SP2 Deployment Guide recommends that you use the ADC from the SP2
CD.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Josh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 04 January 2002 14:42
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: ADC on Exchange2k SP2 disk
Subject: RE: ADC on Exchange2k SP2
:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC on Exchange2k SP2 disk
The SP2 Deployment Guide recommends that you use the ADC from the SP2
CD.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Harmon, Josh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 04 January 2002 14:42
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
