Open Ports !
Hi ! I have an Exchange Server behind a FW, and I would like for my users to connect through the FW as an Exchange Client and read mail and calender. Which port on the FW shoul I open up ? Which portnumbers do ExchangeClient use. Running Win2k/E2k and Outlook2000. Thanks. Ronny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Open Ports !
You really don't want to do what you're asking - it's a security nightmare to just let Outlook pass natively through the firewall. You'd be much happier if you created a virtual private networking connection. Go to http://www.microsoft.com and do a search for VPN. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook http://home.hawaii.rr.com/schorr -Original Message- From: Ronny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 10:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Open Ports ! Hi ! I have an Exchange Server behind a FW, and I would like for my users to connect through the FW as an Exchange Client and read mail and calender. Which port on the FW shoul I open up ? Which portnumbers do ExchangeClient use. Running Win2k/E2k and Outlook2000. Thanks. Ronny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with Recurring Appointments in OL2K
One of my users keeps a record of each employee's birthday in her OL2K Calendar. These are set up as recurring appointments that fire off on the appropriate date. All was working fine until recently. Now when she starts OL at the beginning of the day all these reminders fire off almost immediately. If she were to log off and log back on again during the day then the reminders do not appear but will do so the following day. The only recent event of note was that her mailbox was moved from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 but, because she was also rebuilding her PC at the time, she cannot tell me whether she has had a day without the reminders since that move. I don't know whether this is a problem exclusive to Outlook or whether E2K is involved, hence the post here. David Barnes Cambridge UK _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help with Queues ??
Hi ! I realy needs help here My system was open for relaying befor I closed it down Now, after closing it down, I can't get ridd of all the Queues. I have 815 Queues, and each has 1 massage in the Queue. Help me get this out of my system. Hoe do I do this. By the way, I'm a newbe. Win2k an E2k sp2. Thanks a lot. This is driving me nuts Ronny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: bringing it all together
Thanks for the responses guys. Looking into these now. FYI, I am advised the interorg tool should do all of it. Regards RB _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailbox movin' in between 2 sites
Nt Server 4 sp6a Exchange 5.5 sp3 1 organization / 2 sites (site A + site B) / in each site 1 server(server A + server B). I want to move the public folders and the mailboxes from server A (site A) to server B (site B). I have no idea how to begin with it. (I have few knowledge of Exchange - much more training needed) Maybe one of you can help me with the first steps? Thanks in advance Kurt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook 98 / Exchange 2000
Can Outlook 98 client be used with Exchange 2000 server? Thank! Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Conversion to Internet format failed
I have checked everything and still get the same error when sending to an external mail system. Exch 5.5 sp4 with O2k as client. I have all mail going through the IMC to be sent in plain text. Anyone have any insight? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conversion to Internet format failed
Here is more info. I have a client who was sending *.docs to another person external to us using rich text. I have the IMC to convert everything to plain text. We are still getting the Conversion to Internet format failed error. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Conversion to Internet format failed I have checked everything and still get the same error when sending to an external mail system. Exch 5.5 sp4 with O2k as client. I have all mail going through the IMC to be sent in plain text. Anyone have any insight? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conversion to Internet format failed
Do you receive this error in the event log or from an NDR? If NDR, please post the full message. Or post the full event log error. Does this happen with every external mail sent? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 13:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Conversion to Internet format failed I have checked everything and still get the same error when sending to an external mail system. Exch 5.5 sp4 with O2k as client. I have all mail going through the IMC to be sent in plain text. Anyone have any insight? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conversion to Internet format failed
How's he sending them? As attachments? Or copying and pasting? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 13:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed Here is more info. I have a client who was sending *.docs to another person external to us using rich text. I have the IMC to convert everything to plain text. We are still getting the Conversion to Internet format failed error. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Conversion to Internet format failed I have checked everything and still get the same error when sending to an external mail system. Exch 5.5 sp4 with O2k as client. I have all mail going through the IMC to be sent in plain text. Anyone have any insight? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 98 / Exchange 2000
Yes, and so can the old Exchange 4.0 and 5.0 clients. One of the only differences I am aware of is that older clients (clients older than Outlook 98 with the security patch) will always ask an Exchange 2000 server for the name of the GC server, whereas the newer clients will initially ask the Exchange 2000 server but will then write this info into the local registry (search TechNet for dsproxy) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 04 March 2002 13:43 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Outlook 98 / Exchange 2000 Subject: Outlook 98 / Exchange 2000 Can Outlook 98 client be used with Exchange 2000 server? Thank! Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conversion to Internet format failed
Here are the event Ids. It doesn't happen on every mail sent. Its random. It looks like they are copied and pasted. Thanks. Event ID: 4116 An error was returned from the messaging software the Internet Mail Service uses to process messages on the Microsoft Exchange Server. It is possible that the piece of mail being processed at the time will be returned to the sender as a failed delivery instead of being delivered. The message will be moved to the BAD folder, if possible, and the error is not a temporary error. Otherwise it will be retried when the service is restarted. Use the appropriate utilities found in the SUPPORT directory of your Exchange CD to view and manipulate messages that have been moved to the BAD folder. Event ID: 12007 Error 80070057-8000 occurred while processing message [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject 'FW: Invitation to Freelancers ' from 'West, Lee'. The archive filename is '18V8RHYP'. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed Do you receive this error in the event log or from an NDR? If NDR, please post the full message. Or post the full event log error. Does this happen with every external mail sent? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 13:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Conversion to Internet format failed I have checked everything and still get the same error when sending to an external mail system. Exch 5.5 sp4 with O2k as client. I have all mail going through the IMC to be sent in plain text. Anyone have any insight? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conversion to Internet format failed
This page concerning the particular error has some links to articles that could help your situation. http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=4116source= I would personally ask the client to send .docs as attachments though. Converting some word documents that use a particular font into plain text can have some problems. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 13:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed Here are the event Ids. It doesn't happen on every mail sent. Its random. It looks like they are copied and pasted. Thanks. Event ID: 4116 An error was returned from the messaging software the Internet Mail Service uses to process messages on the Microsoft Exchange Server. It is possible that the piece of mail being processed at the time will be returned to the sender as a failed delivery instead of being delivered. The message will be moved to the BAD folder, if possible, and the error is not a temporary error. Otherwise it will be retried when the service is restarted. Use the appropriate utilities found in the SUPPORT directory of your Exchange CD to view and manipulate messages that have been moved to the BAD folder. Event ID: 12007 Error 80070057-8000 occurred while processing message [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject 'FW: Invitation to Freelancers ' from 'West, Lee'. The archive filename is '18V8RHYP'. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed Do you receive this error in the event log or from an NDR? If NDR, please post the full message. Or post the full event log error. Does this happen with every external mail sent? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 13:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Conversion to Internet format failed I have checked everything and still get the same error when sending to an external mail system. Exch 5.5 sp4 with O2k as client. I have all mail going through the IMC to be sent in plain text. Anyone have any insight? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conversion to Internet format failed
What would be the difference in sending as attachments vs copy and paste? -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed This page concerning the particular error has some links to articles that could help your situation. http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=4116source= I would personally ask the client to send .docs as attachments though. Converting some word documents that use a particular font into plain text can have some problems. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 13:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed Here are the event Ids. It doesn't happen on every mail sent. Its random. It looks like they are copied and pasted. Thanks. Event ID: 4116 An error was returned from the messaging software the Internet Mail Service uses to process messages on the Microsoft Exchange Server. It is possible that the piece of mail being processed at the time will be returned to the sender as a failed delivery instead of being delivered. The message will be moved to the BAD folder, if possible, and the error is not a temporary error. Otherwise it will be retried when the service is restarted. Use the appropriate utilities found in the SUPPORT directory of your Exchange CD to view and manipulate messages that have been moved to the BAD folder. Event ID: 12007 Error 80070057-8000 occurred while processing message [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject 'FW: Invitation to Freelancers ' from 'West, Lee'. The archive filename is '18V8RHYP'. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed Do you receive this error in the event log or from an NDR? If NDR, please post the full message. Or post the full event log error. Does this happen with every external mail sent? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 13:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Conversion to Internet format failed I have checked everything and still get the same error when sending to an external mail system. Exch 5.5 sp4 with O2k as client. I have all mail going through the IMC to be sent in plain text. Anyone have any insight? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pop3 but no user on 2k
I guess this is a simple one, but I just can't find it quickly. Win2K, E2K Is it possible to set up an mail account for POP3/SMTP without a user? I just need an mail account, nothing else. What is the smart way to to it? Thanx for hints all the best Elmer -- Elmer Stöwer CyberConsult - Beratungsgesellschaft für Neue Medien mbH Tel: (030) 39 99 05 -42, Fax: (030) 39 99 05 -67 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conversion to Internet format failed
When you send as attachments, you keep the .docs as .docs and they aren't converted into plain text when going through your IMC. When they are copied and pasted into an email, they cease to be .doc's, they become part of the body of the email. And will only be able to be viewed via an email client at their destination. The IMC will see the email going out and convert everything into plain text. The copied word document may have some fonts in it that the IMC may find trouble to convert. If your client is going to use this method, it may be easier if he used notepad from now on, as it has simple fonts and plain text. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 14:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed What would be the difference in sending as attachments vs copy and paste? -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed This page concerning the particular error has some links to articles that could help your situation. http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=4116source= I would personally ask the client to send .docs as attachments though. Converting some word documents that use a particular font into plain text can have some problems. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 13:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed Here are the event Ids. It doesn't happen on every mail sent. Its random. It looks like they are copied and pasted. Thanks. Event ID: 4116 An error was returned from the messaging software the Internet Mail Service uses to process messages on the Microsoft Exchange Server. It is possible that the piece of mail being processed at the time will be returned to the sender as a failed delivery instead of being delivered. The message will be moved to the BAD folder, if possible, and the error is not a temporary error. Otherwise it will be retried when the service is restarted. Use the appropriate utilities found in the SUPPORT directory of your Exchange CD to view and manipulate messages that have been moved to the BAD folder. Event ID: 12007 Error 80070057-8000 occurred while processing message [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject 'FW: Invitation to Freelancers ' from 'West, Lee'. The archive filename is '18V8RHYP'. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed Do you receive this error in the event log or from an NDR? If NDR, please post the full message. Or post the full event log error. Does this happen with every external mail sent? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 13:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Conversion to Internet format failed I have checked everything and still get the same error when sending to an external mail system. Exch 5.5 sp4 with O2k as client. I have all mail going through the IMC to be sent in plain text. Anyone have any insight? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pop3 but no user on 2k
What is the purpose for doing this? - Original Message - From: Elmer Stöwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:05 AM Subject: pop3 but no user on 2k I guess this is a simple one, but I just can't find it quickly. Win2K, E2K Is it possible to set up an mail account for POP3/SMTP without a user? I just need an mail account, nothing else. What is the smart way to to it? Thanx for hints all the best Elmer -- Elmer Stöwer CyberConsult - Beratungsgesellschaft für Neue Medien mbH Tel: (030) 39 99 05 -42, Fax: (030) 39 99 05 -67 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADS DC hardware
Folks, I'm looking for practical experience from anyone running 'minimal' hardware configurations for domain controllers in an AD forest supporting Exchange 2000/5.5. We are currently very cash strapped but really do need to move on Exchange 2000 from our current Exchange 5.5 environment. We're spinning about 70Gb of Exchange data across two servers (50Gb/20Gb). There are about 1000 NT4 domain users in one domain and around 250 in a trusting domain. We have a serious server configuration we can deploy for Exchange itself to allow mailbox relocation to Exchange 2000 with recycling of the current servers as they are freed up. We have been offered several modern desktop systems which I'm contemplating deploying as domain controllers. The big argument against doing this would be disk failure intolerance - though we would software mirror across 2 IDE drives per machine. Has anyone any experience of this scenario as far as DCs are concerned? Would you offer any cautions from experience? I should say our current NT4 PDC is a fairly limited desktop box and the experience on what is a small domain has been completely OK. Regards, Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conversion to Internet format failed
That makes sense. Thanks for the help:) -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed When you send as attachments, you keep the .docs as .docs and they aren't converted into plain text when going through your IMC. When they are copied and pasted into an email, they cease to be .doc's, they become part of the body of the email. And will only be able to be viewed via an email client at their destination. The IMC will see the email going out and convert everything into plain text. The copied word document may have some fonts in it that the IMC may find trouble to convert. If your client is going to use this method, it may be easier if he used notepad from now on, as it has simple fonts and plain text. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 14:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed What would be the difference in sending as attachments vs copy and paste? -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed This page concerning the particular error has some links to articles that could help your situation. http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=4116source= I would personally ask the client to send .docs as attachments though. Converting some word documents that use a particular font into plain text can have some problems. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 13:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed Here are the event Ids. It doesn't happen on every mail sent. Its random. It looks like they are copied and pasted. Thanks. Event ID: 4116 An error was returned from the messaging software the Internet Mail Service uses to process messages on the Microsoft Exchange Server. It is possible that the piece of mail being processed at the time will be returned to the sender as a failed delivery instead of being delivered. The message will be moved to the BAD folder, if possible, and the error is not a temporary error. Otherwise it will be retried when the service is restarted. Use the appropriate utilities found in the SUPPORT directory of your Exchange CD to view and manipulate messages that have been moved to the BAD folder. Event ID: 12007 Error 80070057-8000 occurred while processing message [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject 'FW: Invitation to Freelancers ' from 'West, Lee'. The archive filename is '18V8RHYP'. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed Do you receive this error in the event log or from an NDR? If NDR, please post the full message. Or post the full event log error. Does this happen with every external mail sent? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 13:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Conversion to Internet format failed I have checked everything and still get the same error when sending to an external mail system. Exch 5.5 sp4 with O2k as client. I have all mail going through the IMC to be sent in plain text. Anyone have any insight? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help with Queues ??
You willing to maybe lose an email or three? Stop the SMTP service. Go to explorer, navigate to \exchsrvr\mailroot\vsi1\queueus Delete the 815 files you find in there that have a time/date stamp = whenever you locked your system down. Or, if you're a glutton for punishment, you can do it the supported way: right-click the queues and select delete messages, no NDR. -Original Message- From: Ronny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 05:17 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Help with Queues ?? Subject: Help with Queues ?? Hi ! I realy needs help here My system was open for relaying befor I closed it down Now, after closing it down, I can't get ridd of all the Queues. I have 815 Queues, and each has 1 massage in the Queue. Help me get this out of my system. Hoe do I do this. By the way, I'm a newbe. Win2k an E2k sp2. Thanks a lot. This is driving me nuts Ronny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pop3 but no user on 2k
No. A mailbox in E2k is tied to a user. Always a 1:1 relationship. So make a user called FakeUser, and give it whatever SMTP address you want. -Original Message- From: Elmer Stöwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 08:05 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: pop3 but no user on 2k Subject: pop3 but no user on 2k I guess this is a simple one, but I just can't find it quickly. Win2K, E2K Is it possible to set up an mail account for POP3/SMTP without a user? I just need an mail account, nothing else. What is the smart way to to it? Thanx for hints all the best Elmer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADS DC hardware
A few comments: * Global Catalog - Load generated by Exchange 2000. Does the Workstation have enought RAM and CPU power to handle the load? It looks like this may become your weakest link in the whole system. * If you absolutely have to use a workstation as a DC/GC...try to get three of them working as DC/GC. That would translate to an average of 400 users per DC/GC... * Software RAID vs. Hardware RAID - If you absolutely have to use IDE, why don't you consider getting an IDE RAID controller card...very very very cheap and much more reliable then a software RAID solution www.promise.com That's my two-bits. Leonard -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger Mackenzie Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADS DC hardware Folks, I'm looking for practical experience from anyone running 'minimal' hardware configurations for domain controllers in an AD forest supporting Exchange 2000/5.5. We are currently very cash strapped but really do need to move on Exchange 2000 from our current Exchange 5.5 environment. We're spinning about 70Gb of Exchange data across two servers (50Gb/20Gb). There are about 1000 NT4 domain users in one domain and around 250 in a trusting domain. We have a serious server configuration we can deploy for Exchange itself to allow mailbox relocation to Exchange 2000 with recycling of the current servers as they are freed up. We have been offered several modern desktop systems which I'm contemplating deploying as domain controllers. The big argument against doing this would be disk failure intolerance - though we would software mirror across 2 IDE drives per machine. Has anyone any experience of this scenario as far as DCs are concerned? Would you offer any cautions from experience? I should say our current NT4 PDC is a fairly limited desktop box and the experience on what is a small domain has been completely OK. Regards, Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADS DC hardware
1000 users? You could do that with a workstation, if you needed to. As you said, my only concern would be fault tolerance. -Original Message- From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 08:18 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: ADS DC hardware Subject: ADS DC hardware Folks, I'm looking for practical experience from anyone running 'minimal' hardware configurations for domain controllers in an AD forest supporting Exchange 2000/5.5. We are currently very cash strapped but really do need to move on Exchange 2000 from our current Exchange 5.5 environment. We're spinning about 70Gb of Exchange data across two servers (50Gb/20Gb). There are about 1000 NT4 domain users in one domain and around 250 in a trusting domain. We have a serious server configuration we can deploy for Exchange itself to allow mailbox relocation to Exchange 2000 with recycling of the current servers as they are freed up. We have been offered several modern desktop systems which I'm contemplating deploying as domain controllers. The big argument against doing this would be disk failure intolerance - though we would software mirror across 2 IDE drives per machine. Has anyone any experience of this scenario as far as DCs are concerned? Would you offer any cautions from experience? I should say our current NT4 PDC is a fairly limited desktop box and the experience on what is a small domain has been completely OK. Regards, Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How do I obtain GAL entries from a Perl script in UNIX?
Query the gal via LDAP. There are a number of perl mods that should allow that. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How do I obtain GAL entries from a Perl script in UNIX? I want to be able to communicate with Microsoft Exchange to obtain entries from the Global Address Book, but I want to do this (if possible) without using ASP. Our server runs on Solaris 7. We have all of the standard UNIX utilities for the web including Perl, etc. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pop3 but no user on 2k
Having a test account for a software project. The software is sending and receiving mail to an account and doesnt need any other access rights. So I have to create a fake user and to take care, that this user has no rights to any other ressource. Sometimes it is good to know that something is just not working as you think it would;) Thanx for the reply regards Elmer -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: pop3 but no user on 2k What is the purpose for doing this? - Original Message - From: Elmer Stöwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:05 AM Subject: pop3 but no user on 2k I guess this is a simple one, but I just can't find it quickly. Win2K, E2K Is it possible to set up an mail account for POP3/SMTP without a user? I just need an mail account, nothing else. What is the smart way to to it? Thanx for hints all the best Elmer -- Elmer Stöwer CyberConsult - Beratungsgesellschaft für Neue Medien mbH Tel: (030) 39 99 05 -42, Fax: (030) 39 99 05 -67 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wierd App log error
anyone know what this means? Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeTransport Event Category: SMTP Protocol Event ID: 1706 Date: 3/4/2002 Time: 10:02:46 AM User: N/A Computer: MAILBOX Description: EXPS is temporarily unable to provide protocol security with merc.mainc.Assiniboine.net. CSessionContext::OnEXPSInNegotiate called HrServerNegotiateAuth which failed with error code 0x8009030c ( N:\transmt\src\smtpsink\exps\expslib\context.cpp@1414 ). Data: : 0c 03 09 80 ...? Can't find anything regarding the error code or event ID... Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Open Ports !
Besides, it isn't as simple as just opening some ports. Exchange does some dynamic port opening. So you have to edit the registry to force certain ports on the Exch server. Plus you have to open 135, which is not a safe move. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 1:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Open Ports ! You really don't want to do what you're asking - it's a security nightmare to just let Outlook pass natively through the firewall. You'd be much happier if you created a virtual private networking connection. Go to http://www.microsoft.com and do a search for VPN. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook http://home.hawaii.rr.com/schorr -Original Message- From: Ronny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 10:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Open Ports ! Hi ! I have an Exchange Server behind a FW, and I would like for my users to connect through the FW as an Exchange Client and read mail and calender. Which port on the FW shoul I open up ? Which portnumbers do ExchangeClient use. Running Win2k/E2k and Outlook2000. Thanks. Ronny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Open Ports !
Any Any Amit Zinman MCSE, Project Manager Professional Services Group Getronics (Israel) Tel: +972-3-5127306 Mobile: +972-53-570139 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ronny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Open Ports ! Hi ! I have an Exchange Server behind a FW, and I would like for my users to connect through the FW as an Exchange Client and read mail and calender. Which port on the FW shoul I open up ? Which portnumbers do ExchangeClient use. Running Win2k/E2k and Outlook2000. Thanks. Ronny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Screensaver attachment
Hello All, We have Exchange 5.5 sp 4 on NT 4 server. Starting last week we are getting messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it causes errors 4130 and 4070 on IMC that it's not able to move the message to archive. I have added this address to filter and delete in IMS. Somehow, it's not doing it. When I stop and restart IMS, it deletes the messages otherwise they just stay in exchsvr/imcdata/in directory. I don't think that it's a valid address because I get undeliverable when I try to send a message to this address. Other than this problem, IMS is working fine. Any ideas? Thanks for your help. Sandhya _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
testing relay
I followed the Microsoft article on preventing mail relay on exchange 5.5 and went to a couple different sites that check your server for you to see if relaying is open, BUT. I get outbound mail failure notifications from email that was not sent out by any of our employees Reason for error is message timeout and I'm unsure if it is a misleading error message. Reason for failure should be that relaying is prohibited? I'm wondering if alas relaying is still possible. The from: address on these messages is invariably Anyone have input? Thanks, Jay _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: testing relay
I believe that's covered in the FAQ. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: James Lavoie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: testing relay I followed the Microsoft article on preventing mail relay on exchange 5.5 and went to a couple different sites that check your server for you to see if relaying is open, BUT. I get outbound mail failure notifications from email that was not sent out by any of our employees Reason for error is message timeout and I'm unsure if it is a misleading error message. Reason for failure should be that relaying is prohibited? I'm wondering if alas relaying is still possible. The from: address on these messages is invariably Anyone have input? Thanks, Jay _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Screensaver attachment
See Q231737 and make sure you don't have a file based AV scanner running against the Exchange working directories. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Sandhya Pai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Screensaver attachment Hello All, We have Exchange 5.5 sp 4 on NT 4 server. Starting last week we are getting messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it causes errors 4130 and 4070 on IMC that it's not able to move the message to archive. I have added this address to filter and delete in IMS. Somehow, it's not doing it. When I stop and restart IMS, it deletes the messages otherwise they just stay in exchsvr/imcdata/in directory. I don't think that it's a valid address because I get undeliverable when I try to send a message to this address. Other than this problem, IMS is working fine. Any ideas? Thanks for your help. Sandhya _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pop3 but no user on 2k
No. William -Original Message- From: Elmer Stöwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 6:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: pop3 but no user on 2k I guess this is a simple one, but I just can't find it quickly. Win2K, E2K Is it possible to set up an mail account for POP3/SMTP without a user? I just need an mail account, nothing else. What is the smart way to to it? Thanx for hints all the best Elmer -- Elmer Stöwer CyberConsult - Beratungsgesellschaft für Neue Medien mbH Tel: (030) 39 99 05 -42, Fax: (030) 39 99 05 -67 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Open Ports !
You sooo bad! John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! *** WARNING: Unencrypted electronic mail is not secure and may not be authentic. If you have any doubts as to the contents of this e-mail, please telephone the Geac representative who appears to be the sender to confirm the validity of this communication . NOTE: This electronic transmission is intended only for those to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is confidential and/or privileged by law. Any claim to privilege is not waived or lost by reason of mistaken transmission of this information. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivery to the intended recipient, you must not review, distribute, copy or make any use of this transmission. In such case, please notify the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of same. *** -Original Message- From: Amit Zinman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Open Ports ! Any Any Amit Zinman MCSE, Project Manager Professional Services Group Getronics (Israel) Tel: +972-3-5127306 Mobile: +972-53-570139 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ronny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Open Ports ! Hi ! I have an Exchange Server behind a FW, and I would like for my users to connect through the FW as an Exchange Client and read mail and calender. Which port on the FW shoul I open up ? Which portnumbers do ExchangeClient use. Running Win2k/E2k and Outlook2000. Thanks. Ronny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OST option not available HELP!
I have Outlook 2000 in which the client is running an application through public folders. To make this application work, all clients must be able to work offline using an .ost file. When I go to the clients that are on a desktop, the option for the .ost is no longer available. I found Q246052 that states if you have Terminal services offline folders will not be available. I looked and have no terminal services activated on the client. Anyone know why 2000 disables .ost files on the desktop? Does it have to have a modem installed or is there a reg key that I can modify to open it up? I tried on Outlook 98 that I had installed on a test box and the option is there. What am I missing here? HELP!!! LaCretia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OST option not available HELP!
I am running Win2K Office2K, and I can setup to use an .ost if I like. The option is under Tools, Services, then Microsoft Exchange Server, Properties, Advanced. You will see a checkbox the says 'Enable Offline Use'. Is that checkbox there? Hope this helps, David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OST option not available HELP! I have Outlook 2000 in which the client is running an application through public folders. To make this application work, all clients must be able to work offline using an .ost file. When I go to the clients that are on a desktop, the option for the .ost is no longer available. I found Q246052 that states if you have Terminal services offline folders will not be available. I looked and have no terminal services activated on the client. Anyone know why 2000 disables .ost files on the desktop? Does it have to have a modem installed or is there a reg key that I can modify to open it up? I tried on Outlook 98 that I had installed on a test box and the option is there. What am I missing here? HELP!!! LaCretia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OST option not available HELP!
No, it's not available. Not there at all.??? Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: OST option not available HELP! I am running Win2K Office2K, and I can setup to use an .ost if I like. The option is under Tools, Services, then Microsoft Exchange Server, Properties, Advanced. You will see a checkbox the says 'Enable Offline Use'. Is that checkbox there? Hope this helps, David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OST option not available HELP! I have Outlook 2000 in which the client is running an application through public folders. To make this application work, all clients must be able to work offline using an .ost file. When I go to the clients that are on a desktop, the option for the .ost is no longer available. I found Q246052 that states if you have Terminal services offline folders will not be available. I looked and have no terminal services activated on the client. Anyone know why 2000 disables .ost files on the desktop? Does it have to have a modem installed or is there a reg key that I can modify to open it up? I tried on Outlook 98 that I had installed on a test box and the option is there. What am I missing here? HELP!!! LaCretia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OST option not available HELP!
We run a script here that makes massive changes and I wasn't sure if it's caused by the script or what? If they tell me what is in the script they told me they would have to kill me. LaCretia -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: OST option not available HELP! No, it's not available. Not there at all.??? Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: OST option not available HELP! I am running Win2K Office2K, and I can setup to use an .ost if I like. The option is under Tools, Services, then Microsoft Exchange Server, Properties, Advanced. You will see a checkbox the says 'Enable Offline Use'. Is that checkbox there? Hope this helps, David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OST option not available HELP! I have Outlook 2000 in which the client is running an application through public folders. To make this application work, all clients must be able to work offline using an .ost file. When I go to the clients that are on a desktop, the option for the .ost is no longer available. I found Q246052 that states if you have Terminal services offline folders will not be available. I looked and have no terminal services activated on the client. Anyone know why 2000 disables .ost files on the desktop? Does it have to have a modem installed or is there a reg key that I can modify to open it up? I tried on Outlook 98 that I had installed on a test box and the option is there. What am I missing here? HELP!!! LaCretia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADS DC hardware
Good thinking on the IDE Raid! Thanks. -Original Message- From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 14:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADS DC hardware A few comments: * Global Catalog - Load generated by Exchange 2000. Does the Workstation have enought RAM and CPU power to handle the load? It looks like this may become your weakest link in the whole system. * If you absolutely have to use a workstation as a DC/GC...try to get three of them working as DC/GC. That would translate to an average of 400 users per DC/GC... * Software RAID vs. Hardware RAID - If you absolutely have to use IDE, why don't you consider getting an IDE RAID controller card...very very very cheap and much more reliable then a software RAID solution www.promise.com That's my two-bits. Leonard -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger Mackenzie Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADS DC hardware Folks, I'm looking for practical experience from anyone running 'minimal' hardware configurations for domain controllers in an AD forest supporting Exchange 2000/5.5. We are currently very cash strapped but really do need to move on Exchange 2000 from our current Exchange 5.5 environment. We're spinning about 70Gb of Exchange data across two servers (50Gb/20Gb). There are about 1000 NT4 domain users in one domain and around 250 in a trusting domain. We have a serious server configuration we can deploy for Exchange itself to allow mailbox relocation to Exchange 2000 with recycling of the current servers as they are freed up. We have been offered several modern desktop systems which I'm contemplating deploying as domain controllers. The big argument against doing this would be disk failure intolerance - though we would software mirror across 2 IDE drives per machine. Has anyone any experience of this scenario as far as DCs are concerned? Would you offer any cautions from experience? I should say our current NT4 PDC is a fairly limited desktop box and the experience on what is a small domain has been completely OK. Regards, Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OST option not available HELP!
Then you need to pass the problem onto them. If they are so unwilling to help, then they will need to pick up the slack. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OST option not available HELP! We run a script here that makes massive changes and I wasn't sure if it's caused by the script or what? If they tell me what is in the script they told me they would have to kill me. LaCretia -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: OST option not available HELP! No, it's not available. Not there at all.??? Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: OST option not available HELP! I am running Win2K Office2K, and I can setup to use an .ost if I like. The option is under Tools, Services, then Microsoft Exchange Server, Properties, Advanced. You will see a checkbox the says 'Enable Offline Use'. Is that checkbox there? Hope this helps, David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OST option not available HELP! I have Outlook 2000 in which the client is running an application through public folders. To make this application work, all clients must be able to work offline using an .ost file. When I go to the clients that are on a desktop, the option for the .ost is no longer available. I found Q246052 that states if you have Terminal services offline folders will not be available. I looked and have no terminal services activated on the client. Anyone know why 2000 disables .ost files on the desktop? Does it have to have a modem installed or is there a reg key that I can modify to open it up? I tried on Outlook 98 that I had installed on a test box and the option is there. What am I missing here? HELP!!! LaCretia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: testing relay
Read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html and digest carefully. Emails with a From: header are delivery notification messages. RFC2822 says mailers must accept these messages (they can, if I recall correctly, do what they like with them). There are an awful lot on non-RFC2822-compliant mail servers out there. Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: James Lavoie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 15:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: testing relay I followed the Microsoft article on preventing mail relay on exchange 5.5 and went to a couple different sites that check your server for you to see if relaying is open, BUT. I get outbound mail failure notifications from email that was not sent out by any of our employees Reason for error is message timeout and I'm unsure if it is a misleading error message. Reason for failure should be that relaying is prohibited? I'm wondering if alas relaying is still possible. The from: address on these messages is invariably Anyone have input? Thanks, Jay _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reasonable message size limits
Serdar, In your message below, you indicate that you, logged all of our internet mail... What program did you use to log your mail? Currently, I have Promodag...would that do it? Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. - Ed Crowley, Exchange Guru -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reasonable message size limits We have 4MB across the board. We were originally looking at 2, 4 and 6MB limits. To reach that number we logged all of our internet mail for two weeks, and found out that only 0.08% of the entire message volume was over 4MB (that is about 300 messages a week for us). And, only about 10 of those were actually business related and those were sent by a certain group of people. That means that setting the limit at 4MB would impact only a miniscule amount of messages. That was acceptable impact for management. We ended up making an exception for that group (10MB) and now we do have a working message size limit. Setting a limit after a study like that felt a lot better than pulling a number out of you know where. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Reasonable message size limits Hello, I have been required to raise the message size limit on all connections to 20Mbs. We have already seen it cause problems across one of our links. I know it is dependent on the bandwidth and hardware. I just wanted to get some ideas of what size limits other companies are using. Thanks. Ken Jasa Messaging Manager Weber Shandwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: testing relay
Oops, rfc2821... Slip of the finger and brain... Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 17:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: testing relay Read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html and digest carefully. Emails with a From: header are delivery notification messages. RFC2822 says mailers must accept these messages (they can, if I recall correctly, do what they like with them). There are an awful lot on non-RFC2822-compliant mail servers out there. Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: James Lavoie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 15:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: testing relay I followed the Microsoft article on preventing mail relay on exchange 5.5 and went to a couple different sites that check your server for you to see if relaying is open, BUT. I get outbound mail failure notifications from email that was not sent out by any of our employees Reason for error is message timeout and I'm unsure if it is a misleading error message. Reason for failure should be that relaying is prohibited? I'm wondering if alas relaying is still possible. The from: address on these messages is invariably Anyone have input? Thanks, Jay _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OST option not available HELP!
That's why I am asking if this is this way by default or if it's just my environment. If I determine it's my environment, I will make them take ownership of the problem. I have to prove that first. LaCretia -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: OST option not available HELP! Then you need to pass the problem onto them. If they are so unwilling to help, then they will need to pick up the slack. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OST option not available HELP! We run a script here that makes massive changes and I wasn't sure if it's caused by the script or what? If they tell me what is in the script they told me they would have to kill me. LaCretia -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: OST option not available HELP! No, it's not available. Not there at all.??? Regards, LaCretia Sandoval Dallas LAN Administrator Triaton, NA, Inc. 972-443-4027 ___ -Original Message- From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: OST option not available HELP! I am running Win2K Office2K, and I can setup to use an .ost if I like. The option is under Tools, Services, then Microsoft Exchange Server, Properties, Advanced. You will see a checkbox the says 'Enable Offline Use'. Is that checkbox there? Hope this helps, David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OST option not available HELP! I have Outlook 2000 in which the client is running an application through public folders. To make this application work, all clients must be able to work offline using an .ost file. When I go to the clients that are on a desktop, the option for the .ost is no longer available. I found Q246052 that states if you have Terminal services offline folders will not be available. I looked and have no terminal services activated on the client. Anyone know why 2000 disables .ost files on the desktop? Does it have to have a modem installed or is there a reg key that I can modify to open it up? I tried on Outlook 98 that I had installed on a test box and the option is there. What am I missing here? HELP!!! LaCretia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: testing relay
And, of course, servers that don't exist except in the fertile imagination of some spammer are unlikely to accept any NDRs. Peter -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: testing relay Read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html and digest carefully. Emails with a From: header are delivery notification messages. RFC2822 says mailers must accept these messages (they can, if I recall correctly, do what they like with them). There are an awful lot on non-RFC2822-compliant mail servers out there. Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: James Lavoie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 15:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: testing relay I followed the Microsoft article on preventing mail relay on exchange 5.5 and went to a couple different sites that check your server for you to see if relaying is open, BUT. I get outbound mail failure notifications from email that was not sent out by any of our employees Reason for error is message timeout and I'm unsure if it is a misleading error message. Reason for failure should be that relaying is prohibited? I'm wondering if alas relaying is still possible. The from: address on these messages is invariably Anyone have input? Thanks, Jay _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Account locked out
Exchange 2000 SP2. I have a user account that is all of a sudden being locked out. I discovered the first instance on Friday when the user could not log in. I checked the account to day and found it was locked out again. What logging can I turn on to figure out why this is happening. Other suggestions also welcome. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Account locked out
Sounds like someone else is trying to login as them. Try turning on auditing and log login success and failures to see if that is what's happening. - Original Message - From: James Liddil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:18 PM Subject: Account locked out Exchange 2000 SP2. I have a user account that is all of a sudden being locked out. I discovered the first instance on Friday when the user could not log in. I checked the account to day and found it was locked out again. What logging can I turn on to figure out why this is happening. Other suggestions also welcome. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NTDSNoMatch
Depending on how you have your ADC set, is NTDSNoMatch supposed to create a disabled user account for the mailbox that has NTDSNoMatch in Custom Attribute 10? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Child Domains and account creation
Has anyone had problems adding 2K/E2K accounts in a multiple child domain environment. Seems when I create the user account from the Domain controller that has the Exchange server and I create the user in the child domain, the create exchange mailbox appears but the email account does not show up in the GAL from an Outlook client.. It does show up in the preview tab under system manager for the GAL. The child domain was added after. Do I need to extend the schema or something else with an AD tool? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Child Domains and account creation
I assume you ran /domainprep on the child domain, or you wouldn't be able to create the mailboxes at all for that domain. Put in your Exchange CD in the DC of the child domain. Run setup and select administrative tools. Apply pertinent service pack. Now your MMC will have the correct display fields. Note that if you were to manually construct an MMC console, or use a script for account/mailbox creation, you wouldn't really have to do this. The schema attributes are there, you just don't have any way of getting at them. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:23 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Child Domains and account creation Subject: Child Domains and account creation Has anyone had problems adding 2K/E2K accounts in a multiple child domain environment. Seems when I create the user account from the Domain controller that has the Exchange server and I create the user in the child domain, the create exchange mailbox appears but the email account does not show up in the GAL from an Outlook client.. It does show up in the preview tab under system manager for the GAL. The child domain was added after. Do I need to extend the schema or something else with an AD tool? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NTDSNoMatch
Fairly Correct. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q274173 The multimb.exe utility can be used to identify those as well. William -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NTDSNoMatch Depending on how you have your ADC set, is NTDSNoMatch supposed to create a disabled user account for the mailbox that has NTDSNoMatch in Custom Attribute 10? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NTDSNoMatch
It's my understanding that setting custom attribute 10 merely tells the ADC to create a disabled account for that mailbox. In addition, the ADC creates disabled accounts by default, but it is possible to configure the ADC to create enabled accounts (assuming you have no password security policy in place on the W2k domain, since the ADC creates accounts with a blank password) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 04 March 2002 17:23 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: NTDSNoMatch Subject: NTDSNoMatch Depending on how you have your ADC set, is NTDSNoMatch supposed to create a disabled user account for the mailbox that has NTDSNoMatch in Custom Attribute 10? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Child Domains and account creation
If one was to upgrade a NT4.0 domain to a child domain then after running the 2000 upgrade then the Exchange CD should be put in to after and run that same procedure. If that newly created child domain was under the top level domain where the E2K server resides? - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:36 PM Subject: RE: Child Domains and account creation I assume you ran /domainprep on the child domain, or you wouldn't be able to create the mailboxes at all for that domain. Put in your Exchange CD in the DC of the child domain. Run setup and select administrative tools. Apply pertinent service pack. Now your MMC will have the correct display fields. Note that if you were to manually construct an MMC console, or use a script for account/mailbox creation, you wouldn't really have to do this. The schema attributes are there, you just don't have any way of getting at them. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:23 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Child Domains and account creation Subject: Child Domains and account creation Has anyone had problems adding 2K/E2K accounts in a multiple child domain environment. Seems when I create the user account from the Domain controller that has the Exchange server and I create the user in the child domain, the create exchange mailbox appears but the email account does not show up in the GAL from an Outlook client.. It does show up in the preview tab under system manager for the GAL. The child domain was added after. Do I need to extend the schema or something else with an AD tool? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Child Domains and account creation
Just remembered that I did not run domainprep on the child domain prior to loading the tool. I got the email prompt from the main domain. Is it OK you think to run domain prep on the child domain after the fact.? - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:36 PM Subject: RE: Child Domains and account creation I assume you ran /domainprep on the child domain, or you wouldn't be able to create the mailboxes at all for that domain. Put in your Exchange CD in the DC of the child domain. Run setup and select administrative tools. Apply pertinent service pack. Now your MMC will have the correct display fields. Note that if you were to manually construct an MMC console, or use a script for account/mailbox creation, you wouldn't really have to do this. The schema attributes are there, you just don't have any way of getting at them. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:23 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Child Domains and account creation Subject: Child Domains and account creation Has anyone had problems adding 2K/E2K accounts in a multiple child domain environment. Seems when I create the user account from the Domain controller that has the Exchange server and I create the user in the child domain, the create exchange mailbox appears but the email account does not show up in the GAL from an Outlook client.. It does show up in the preview tab under system manager for the GAL. The child domain was added after. Do I need to extend the schema or something else with an AD tool? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Child Domains and account creation
Have you created an RUS for the child domain? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 17:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Child Domains and account creation Just remembered that I did not run domainprep on the child domain prior to loading the tool. I got the email prompt from the main domain. Is it OK you think to run domain prep on the child domain after the fact.? - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:36 PM Subject: RE: Child Domains and account creation I assume you ran /domainprep on the child domain, or you wouldn't be able to create the mailboxes at all for that domain. Put in your Exchange CD in the DC of the child domain. Run setup and select administrative tools. Apply pertinent service pack. Now your MMC will have the correct display fields. Note that if you were to manually construct an MMC console, or use a script for account/mailbox creation, you wouldn't really have to do this. The schema attributes are there, you just don't have any way of getting at them. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:23 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Child Domains and account creation Subject: Child Domains and account creation Has anyone had problems adding 2K/E2K accounts in a multiple child domain environment. Seems when I create the user account from the Domain controller that has the Exchange server and I create the user in the child domain, the create exchange mailbox appears but the email account does not show up in the GAL from an Outlook client.. It does show up in the preview tab under system manager for the GAL. The child domain was added after. Do I need to extend the schema or something else with an AD tool? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Child Domains and account creation
No. I have only one Exchange server. It resides above all other child domains. - Original Message - From: Mark Harford [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:55 PM Subject: RE: Child Domains and account creation Have you created an RUS for the child domain? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 17:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Child Domains and account creation Just remembered that I did not run domainprep on the child domain prior to loading the tool. I got the email prompt from the main domain. Is it OK you think to run domain prep on the child domain after the fact.? - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:36 PM Subject: RE: Child Domains and account creation I assume you ran /domainprep on the child domain, or you wouldn't be able to create the mailboxes at all for that domain. Put in your Exchange CD in the DC of the child domain. Run setup and select administrative tools. Apply pertinent service pack. Now your MMC will have the correct display fields. Note that if you were to manually construct an MMC console, or use a script for account/mailbox creation, you wouldn't really have to do this. The schema attributes are there, you just don't have any way of getting at them. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:23 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Child Domains and account creation Subject: Child Domains and account creation Has anyone had problems adding 2K/E2K accounts in a multiple child domain environment. Seems when I create the user account from the Domain controller that has the Exchange server and I create the user in the child domain, the create exchange mailbox appears but the email account does not show up in the GAL from an Outlook client.. It does show up in the preview tab under system manager for the GAL. The child domain was added after. Do I need to extend the schema or something else with an AD tool? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Screensaver attachment
I looked at that q article and that's not our problem because everything else works fine and we only use exchange aware scanner (Antigen) in our server. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Screensaver attachment See Q231737 and make sure you don't have a file based AV scanner running against the Exchange working directories. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Sandhya Pai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Screensaver attachment Hello All, We have Exchange 5.5 sp 4 on NT 4 server. Starting last week we are getting messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it causes errors 4130 and 4070 on IMC that it's not able to move the message to archive. I have added this address to filter and delete in IMS. Somehow, it's not doing it. When I stop and restart IMS, it deletes the messages otherwise they just stay in exchsvr/imcdata/in directory. I don't think that it's a valid address because I get undeliverable when I try to send a message to this address. Other than this problem, IMS is working fine. Any ideas? Thanks for your help. Sandhya _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
changed display NAME AND
Good afternoon, Outlook 98 NT 5.5 SP4. Mary Taylor did not want to be on the global address list as Mary any longer. She said all of her friends knew her as MJ. SO I changed her from Taylor Mary to Taylor MJ. Now her name does not resolve when I key in MJ Taylor as where Mary Taylor did resolve. IS there anything else I have to change? DO I have to delete the nick file? Have a great day, EMM no longer Mike Mitchell Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2,000 scalability question.
-Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Regarding #2, your argument is valid for Exchange 5.5, but with Exchange 2000 and multiple databases your time to recovery shouldn't be a function of the number of mailboxes on the server but the number in a database. True, the discussion should be (mostly) based on number of stores rather than number of servers for Exchange 2000. I make a pretty good rebuttal in five minutes, seeing as it took you a week to come up with yours, no?! Um, ok. Congratulations. I didn't realize it was a contest. I usually only have time to scan the list mail every week or so. Peter _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Account locked out
Either someone else is trying to logon as that user. One common thing we have seen is that people will use their personal accounts for service accounts (these are developers, not IT). After they change the password, the service account will do something that requires authentication. -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Account locked out Exchange 2000 SP2. I have a user account that is all of a sudden being locked out. I discovered the first instance on Friday when the user could not log in. I checked the account to day and found it was locked out again. What logging can I turn on to figure out why this is happening. Other suggestions also welcome. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Account locked out
On this site, we have people that move around all over the place. Today, they could be logged into a turnaround machine downtown, tomorrow they could be logged into their machine 45 minutes away, out in the field. A lot of times, they log into the turnaround machine, lock it and walk away to go do something else and forget to come back and log out. Then, when they change their password, that machine that is still logged in keeps locking them out. If you have SMS 2.0 running on your site, you can get a list of the computers this account is logging in from. Then go check each of those machines. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Account locked out Exchange 2000 SP2. I have a user account that is all of a sudden being locked out. I discovered the first instance on Friday when the user could not log in. I checked the account to day and found it was locked out again. What logging can I turn on to figure out why this is happening. Other suggestions also welcome. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fixed: Child Domains and account creation
Thanks for the tips. Ran domainprep on the child domain ( made sure logged in as right person) Created RUS. Yes found out you need this even if you have only one Exchange server and are trying to work with child domains without an exchange server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Child Domains and account creation
You still need to /domainprep all your child domains, and you still need a RUS for each. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:52 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Child Domains and account creation Subject: Re: Child Domains and account creation No. I have only one Exchange server. It resides above all other child domains. - Original Message - From: Mark Harford [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:55 PM Subject: RE: Child Domains and account creation Have you created an RUS for the child domain? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 17:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Child Domains and account creation Just remembered that I did not run domainprep on the child domain prior to loading the tool. I got the email prompt from the main domain. Is it OK you think to run domain prep on the child domain after the fact.? - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:36 PM Subject: RE: Child Domains and account creation I assume you ran /domainprep on the child domain, or you wouldn't be able to create the mailboxes at all for that domain. Put in your Exchange CD in the DC of the child domain. Run setup and select administrative tools. Apply pertinent service pack. Now your MMC will have the correct display fields. Note that if you were to manually construct an MMC console, or use a script for account/mailbox creation, you wouldn't really have to do this. The schema attributes are there, you just don't have any way of getting at them. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:23 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Child Domains and account creation Subject: Child Domains and account creation Has anyone had problems adding 2K/E2K accounts in a multiple child domain environment. Seems when I create the user account from the Domain controller that has the Exchange server and I create the user in the child domain, the create exchange mailbox appears but the email account does not show up in the GAL from an Outlook client.. It does show up in the preview tab under system manager for the GAL. The child domain was added after. Do I need to extend the schema or something else with an AD tool? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Global Address Book
When running Exch2k in 5.5 org, what address book view is used? Can you specify? 5.5 or 2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Global Address Book
Let me reprase. I know exch2k is used. Can you use 5.5 as well? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Global Address Book
No. Those are strictly LDAP queries against the Active Directory. So Exch2k isn't really used either. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:58 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Global Address Book Subject: Global Address Book Let me reprase. I know exch2k is used. Can you use 5.5 as well? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Global Address Book
Nevermind, I answered my own question. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Child Domains and account creation You still need to /domainprep all your child domains, and you still need a RUS for each. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:52 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Child Domains and account creation Subject: Re: Child Domains and account creation No. I have only one Exchange server. It resides above all other child domains. - Original Message - From: Mark Harford [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:55 PM Subject: RE: Child Domains and account creation Have you created an RUS for the child domain? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 17:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Child Domains and account creation Just remembered that I did not run domainprep on the child domain prior to loading the tool. I got the email prompt from the main domain. Is it OK you think to run domain prep on the child domain after the fact.? - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:36 PM Subject: RE: Child Domains and account creation I assume you ran /domainprep on the child domain, or you wouldn't be able to create the mailboxes at all for that domain. Put in your Exchange CD in the DC of the child domain. Run setup and select administrative tools. Apply pertinent service pack. Now your MMC will have the correct display fields. Note that if you were to manually construct an MMC console, or use a script for account/mailbox creation, you wouldn't really have to do this. The schema attributes are there, you just don't have any way of getting at them. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:23 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Child Domains and account creation Subject: Child Domains and account creation Has anyone had problems adding 2K/E2K accounts in a multiple child domain environment. Seems when I create the user account from the Domain controller that has the Exchange server and I create the user in the child domain, the create exchange mailbox appears but the email account does not show up in the GAL from an Outlook client.. It does show up in the preview tab under system manager for the GAL. The child domain was added after. Do I need to extend the schema or something else with an AD tool? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Global Address Book
It depends on what user is connecting to his or her exchange server. If you are on 5.5 you get the 55 Address Book View. If you are on 2k, you get its ABV. Weird. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address Book No. Those are strictly LDAP queries against the Active Directory. So Exch2k isn't really used either. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:58 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Global Address Book Subject: Global Address Book Let me reprase. I know exch2k is used. Can you use 5.5 as well? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fixed: New Child Domains and account creation
Again everything worked fine, but now another problem arose. When a user created in the child domain tries and access the email from the OWA client it does not let him in. The IIS server running OWA services is also in the top domain. It will work if I put in the child domain name. (xxx.xxx) but not (xxx) This is not what we want as we defaulted the domain is the IIS settings to the top domain (xxx). I now imagine I have to do something with the IIS settings any clues on this one? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DSAMAIN.EXE
I just took a look at my exchange servers, and one of them was pegged at 100%. Now that is not an unusual occurence, but the fact that the dsamain.exe was hogging up most of the CPU was something that struck me as odd. Anyone know what would cause the dsamain.exe to start hogging CPU? Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fixed: New Child Domains and account creation
No. You're saying you have a user JOE in domain CHILD, but you want him to login as PARENT\JOE. I think. Is that what you're saying? You can make a new http virtual server for the child domain, then set the default domain for that domain as CHILD, then tell them to ignore the domain if they see it. It can't be too difficult for them to log in as CHILD\JOE, since that's how they log onto their domain machines in the first place, eh? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 01:00 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Fixed: New Child Domains and account creation Subject: Re: Fixed: New Child Domains and account creation Again everything worked fine, but now another problem arose. When a user created in the child domain tries and access the email from the OWA client it does not let him in. The IIS server running OWA services is also in the top domain. It will work if I put in the child domain name. (xxx.xxx) but not (xxx) This is not what we want as we defaulted the domain is the IIS settings to the top domain (xxx). I now imagine I have to do something with the IIS settings any clues on this one? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: changed display NAME AND
Is she on the same server you are? It may just be replication delay. Peter -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: changed display NAME AND Good afternoon, Outlook 98 NT 5.5 SP4. Mary Taylor did not want to be on the global address list as Mary any longer. She said all of her friends knew her as MJ. SO I changed her from Taylor Mary to Taylor MJ. Now her name does not resolve when I key in MJ Taylor as where Mary Taylor did resolve. IS there anything else I have to change? DO I have to delete the nick file? Have a great day, EMM no longer Mike Mitchell Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Address Book View
Sorry to bother the list so much. I am currently reconfiguring our ABV because our old one was set up wrong. Is it alright to change the display name of the Org.? I have tested and do not see any problems yet. Of course I am testing on a test box. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Address Book View
Yes, you can change it. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Address Book View Sorry to bother the list so much. I am currently reconfiguring our ABV because our old one was set up wrong. Is it alright to change the display name of the Org.? I have tested and do not see any problems yet. Of course I am testing on a test box. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fixed: New Child Domains and account creation
Well I see your point. Never tried it before but sure I can give it a try. Time to turn the page to that section. I'll let you know. - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:12 PM Subject: RE: Fixed: New Child Domains and account creation No. You're saying you have a user JOE in domain CHILD, but you want him to login as PARENT\JOE. I think. Is that what you're saying? You can make a new http virtual server for the child domain, then set the default domain for that domain as CHILD, then tell them to ignore the domain if they see it. It can't be too difficult for them to log in as CHILD\JOE, since that's how they log onto their domain machines in the first place, eh? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 01:00 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Fixed: New Child Domains and account creation Subject: Re: Fixed: New Child Domains and account creation Again everything worked fine, but now another problem arose. When a user created in the child domain tries and access the email from the OWA client it does not let him in. The IIS server running OWA services is also in the top domain. It will work if I put in the child domain name. (xxx.xxx) but not (xxx) This is not what we want as we defaulted the domain is the IIS settings to the top domain (xxx). I now imagine I have to do something with the IIS settings any clues on this one? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange reporting tool
Is there a good statistics reporting tool for Exchange server 5.5 and IMS for SMTP traffic? Is there any freeware that can do? Thanks. YW _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange reporting tool
Performance Monitor. Installing Exchange adds lots of neat counters. Crystal Reports. Exchange5.5 ships with a trimmed down Crystal Reports app to generate these kinds of things. William Lefkovics -Original Message- From: Wei Yan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange reporting tool Is there a good statistics reporting tool for Exchange server 5.5 and IMS for SMTP traffic? Is there any freeware that can do? Thanks. YW _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fixed: New Child Domains and account creation
Reread your response. To your first statement the is Yes. I want them to log in as the parent domain even though there account resides in a child domain. Is this possible still making a new Virtual? - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:12 PM Subject: RE: Fixed: New Child Domains and account creation No. You're saying you have a user JOE in domain CHILD, but you want him to login as PARENT\JOE. I think. Is that what you're saying? You can make a new http virtual server for the child domain, then set the default domain for that domain as CHILD, then tell them to ignore the domain if they see it. It can't be too difficult for them to log in as CHILD\JOE, since that's how they log onto their domain machines in the first place, eh? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 01:00 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Fixed: New Child Domains and account creation Subject: Re: Fixed: New Child Domains and account creation Again everything worked fine, but now another problem arose. When a user created in the child domain tries and access the email from the OWA client it does not let him in. The IIS server running OWA services is also in the top domain. It will work if I put in the child domain name. (xxx.xxx) but not (xxx) This is not what we want as we defaulted the domain is the IIS settings to the top domain (xxx). I now imagine I have to do something with the IIS settings any clues on this one? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fixed: New Child Domains and account creation
No. Parent\jsmith is just as different from child\jsmith as it is from child\cliff_yablonski. In other words, way different. They're not the same. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 01:40 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Fixed: New Child Domains and account creation Subject: Re: Fixed: New Child Domains and account creation Reread your response. To your first statement the is Yes. I want them to log in as the parent domain even though there account resides in a child domain. Is this possible still making a new Virtual? - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:12 PM Subject: RE: Fixed: New Child Domains and account creation No. You're saying you have a user JOE in domain CHILD, but you want him to login as PARENT\JOE. I think. Is that what you're saying? You can make a new http virtual server for the child domain, then set the default domain for that domain as CHILD, then tell them to ignore the domain if they see it. It can't be too difficult for them to log in as CHILD\JOE, since that's how they log onto their domain machines in the first place, eh? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 01:00 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Fixed: New Child Domains and account creation Subject: Re: Fixed: New Child Domains and account creation Again everything worked fine, but now another problem arose. When a user created in the child domain tries and access the email from the OWA client it does not let him in. The IIS server running OWA services is also in the top domain. It will work if I put in the child domain name. (xxx.xxx) but not (xxx) This is not what we want as we defaulted the domain is the IIS settings to the top domain (xxx). I now imagine I have to do something with the IIS settings any clues on this one? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DSAMAIN.EXE
Is that server a bridgehead server? Maybe it's replicating. Serdar Soysal PS: If it's common for your servers to peg at 100% CPU, maybe you should consider getting faster/more processors. -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DSAMAIN.EXE I just took a look at my exchange servers, and one of them was pegged at 100%. Now that is not an unusual occurence, but the fact that the dsamain.exe was hogging up most of the CPU was something that struck me as odd. Anyone know what would cause the dsamain.exe to start hogging CPU? Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailbox movin' in between 2 sites
You have multiple options. Read up on move server wizard. I've never used that so I'm sure somebody else would have more valuable information on that. I personally would use ExMerge to move the users and then replicate/rehome the public folders. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mailbox movin' in between 2 sites Nt Server 4 sp6a Exchange 5.5 sp3 1 organization / 2 sites (site A + site B) / in each site 1 server(server A + server B). I want to move the public folders and the mailboxes from server A (site A) to server B (site B). I have no idea how to begin with it. (I have few knowledge of Exchange - much more training needed) Maybe one of you can help me with the first steps? Thanks in advance Kurt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOF replies to the Internet
Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet. How does this work to avoid mail loops? ...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works internally? Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains the same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD. True? Thanks! Rob Sargent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Open Ports !
Get rid of that firewall. It just adds another useless level of complexity. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Ronny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Open Ports ! Hi ! I have an Exchange Server behind a FW, and I would like for my users to connect through the FW as an Exchange Client and read mail and calender. Which port on the FW shoul I open up ? Which portnumbers do ExchangeClient use. Running Win2k/E2k and Outlook2000. Thanks. Ronny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem with Recurring Appointments in OL2K
Try /cleanreminders switch. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q197180 Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: David Barnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 6:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem with Recurring Appointments in OL2K One of my users keeps a record of each employee's birthday in her OL2K Calendar. These are set up as recurring appointments that fire off on the appropriate date. All was working fine until recently. Now when she starts OL at the beginning of the day all these reminders fire off almost immediately. If she were to log off and log back on again during the day then the reminders do not appear but will do so the following day. The only recent event of note was that her mailbox was moved from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 but, because she was also rebuilding her PC at the time, she cannot tell me whether she has had a day without the reminders since that move. I don't know whether this is a problem exclusive to Outlook or whether E2K is involved, hence the post here. David Barnes Cambridge UK _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOF replies to the Internet
I don't mind autoreply. I dislike OOF though. -Original Message- From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOF replies to the Internet Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet. How does this work to avoid mail loops? ...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works internally? Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains the same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD. True? Thanks! Rob Sargent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOF replies to the Internet
OOF's only fire one per sender - internally or externally. It's the allowing automatic replies to the Internet that causes the mail loops as these do not discriminate. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 20:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet I don't mind autoreply. I dislike OOF though. -Original Message- From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOF replies to the Internet Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet. How does this work to avoid mail loops? ...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works internally? Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains the same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD. True? Thanks! Rob Sargent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Open Ports !
Now wouldn't you feel bad if he does just that. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Open Ports ! Get rid of that firewall. It just adds another useless level of complexity. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Ronny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Open Ports ! Hi ! I have an Exchange Server behind a FW, and I would like for my users to connect through the FW as an Exchange Client and read mail and calender. Which port on the FW shoul I open up ? Which portnumbers do ExchangeClient use. Running Win2k/E2k and Outlook2000. Thanks. Ronny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOF replies to the Internet
Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause mail loops... Allowing OOFS to the internet: Tom Meunier I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address. Please put me on your A list for resale to other spammers. I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy. Since I've just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax assessor's web site and look up the location of my residence. Help yourself. Hello customer. I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in my firm who wants your business. The bonus is, however, all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away. Please don't go visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier -Original Message- From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOF replies to the Internet Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet. How does this work to avoid mail loops? ...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works internally? Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains the same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD. True? Thanks! Rob Sargent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOF replies to the Internet
Imp filing this one away for another day! -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause mail loops... Allowing OOFS to the internet: Tom Meunier I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address. Please put me on your A list for resale to other spammers. I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy. Since I've just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax assessor's web site and look up the location of my residence. Help yourself. Hello customer. I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in my firm who wants your business. The bonus is, however, all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away. Please don't go visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier -Original Message- From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOF replies to the Internet Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet. How does this work to avoid mail loops? ...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works internally? Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains the same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD. True? Thanks! Rob Sargent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reasonable message size limits
Actually since we didn't have a 3rd party tool, we simply bumped up the diagnostics on the IMCs and archived all traffic. Then ran scripts etc to analyze the pile of messages captured. Since you have Promodag and it does analyze tracking logs, your job will be a lot easier than what we did. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reasonable message size limits Serdar, In your message below, you indicate that you, logged all of our internet mail... What program did you use to log your mail? Currently, I have Promodag...would that do it? Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. - Ed Crowley, Exchange Guru -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reasonable message size limits We have 4MB across the board. We were originally looking at 2, 4 and 6MB limits. To reach that number we logged all of our internet mail for two weeks, and found out that only 0.08% of the entire message volume was over 4MB (that is about 300 messages a week for us). And, only about 10 of those were actually business related and those were sent by a certain group of people. That means that setting the limit at 4MB would impact only a miniscule amount of messages. That was acceptable impact for management. We ended up making an exception for that group (10MB) and now we do have a working message size limit. Setting a limit after a study like that felt a lot better than pulling a number out of you know where. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Reasonable message size limits Hello, I have been required to raise the message size limit on all connections to 20Mbs. We have already seen it cause problems across one of our links. I know it is dependent on the bandwidth and hardware. I just wanted to get some ideas of what size limits other companies are using. Thanks. Ken Jasa Messaging Manager Weber Shandwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMS logs
Hi Guys, On one of my exchange servers which happen to be running Internet mail service there is a folder \exchsrvr\imcdata\log and has very large log (up to a gig large) files. Any ideas about what it is and is there a way to shrink these log files? Thanks Davinder _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Open Ports !
There was a time I was a caring individual with a sense of conscience. Then I met a mulcher-lover (he knows who he is) who taught me how much fun it is to be evil and mean to people. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Open Ports ! Now wouldn't you feel bad if he does just that. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Open Ports ! Get rid of that firewall. It just adds another useless level of complexity. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Ronny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Open Ports ! Hi ! I have an Exchange Server behind a FW, and I would like for my users to connect through the FW as an Exchange Client and read mail and calender. Which port on the FW shoul I open up ? Which portnumbers do ExchangeClient use. Running Win2k/E2k and Outlook2000. Thanks. Ronny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS logs
They are SMTP protocol logs. You can't shrink them, but can stop new ones from being created by toning down your diagnostic logging settings in your IMS. If you don't even know what they are, chances are you'll never look at them. Therefore, they can probably be safely moved off to another location and deleted from your server after you restart your IMS. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMS logs Hi Guys, On one of my exchange servers which happen to be running Internet mail service there is a folder \exchsrvr\imcdata\log and has very large log (up to a gig large) files. Any ideas about what it is and is there a way to shrink these log files? Thanks Davinder _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOF replies to the Internet
a. Your spell-chunker changed onus to bonus. b. Ed C. said much of the same stuff before I did. I'm handsomer, though. Well, taller. c. Good to see you're still with us. -tom -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 02:25 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: OOF replies to the Internet Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause mail loops... Allowing OOFS to the internet: Tom Meunier I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address. Please put me on your A list for resale to other spammers. I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy. Since I've just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax assessor's web site and look up the location of my residence. Help yourself. Hello customer. I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in my firm who wants your business. The bonus is, however, all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away. Please don't go visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier -Original Message- From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOF replies to the Internet Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet. How does this work to avoid mail loops? ...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works internally? Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains the same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD. True? Thanks! Rob Sargent __ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS logs
large log... -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMS logs Hi Guys, On one of my exchange servers which happen to be running Internet mail service there is a folder \exchsrvr\imcdata\log and has very large log (up to a gig large) files. Any ideas about what it is and is there a way to shrink these log files? Thanks Davinder _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOF replies to the Internet
Actually she changed it from Owner to Boner. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet a. Your spell-chunker changed onus to bonus. b. Ed C. said much of the same stuff before I did. I'm handsomer, though. Well, taller. c. Good to see you're still with us. -tom -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 02:25 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: OOF replies to the Internet Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause mail loops... Allowing OOFS to the internet: Tom Meunier I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address. Please put me on your A list for resale to other spammers. I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy. Since I've just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax assessor's web site and look up the location of my residence. Help yourself. Hello customer. I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in my firm who wants your business. The bonus is, however, all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away. Please don't go visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier -Original Message- From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOF replies to the Internet Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet. How does this work to avoid mail loops? ...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works internally? Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains the same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD. True? Thanks! Rob Sargent __ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOF replies to the Internet
I'm lurking. Same questions different year. My spellchecker didn't change it, I did. I was actually being cordial. Ed is more my type. He's got the geek look goin' on. Yum. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet a. Your spell-chunker changed onus to bonus. b. Ed C. said much of the same stuff before I did. I'm handsomer, though. Well, taller. c. Good to see you're still with us. -tom -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 02:25 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: OOF replies to the Internet Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause mail loops... Allowing OOFS to the internet: Tom Meunier I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address. Please put me on your A list for resale to other spammers. I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy. Since I've just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax assessor's web site and look up the location of my residence. Help yourself. Hello customer. I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in my firm who wants your business. The bonus is, however, all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away. Please don't go visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier -Original Message- From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOF replies to the Internet Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet. How does this work to avoid mail loops? ...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works internally? Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains the same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD. True? Thanks! Rob Sargent __ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOF replies to the Internet
He floats like a butterfly and stings when he pees. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet I'm lurking. Same questions different year. My spellchecker didn't change it, I did. I was actually being cordial. Ed is more my type. He's got the geek look goin' on. Yum. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet a. Your spell-chunker changed onus to bonus. b. Ed C. said much of the same stuff before I did. I'm handsomer, though. Well, taller. c. Good to see you're still with us. -tom -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 02:25 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: OOF replies to the Internet Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause mail loops... Allowing OOFS to the internet: Tom Meunier I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address. Please put me on your A list for resale to other spammers. I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy. Since I've just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax assessor's web site and look up the location of my residence. Help yourself. Hello customer. I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in my firm who wants your business. The bonus is, however, all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away. Please don't go visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier -Original Message- From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOF replies to the Internet Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet. How does this work to avoid mail loops? ...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works internally? Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains the same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD. True? Thanks! Rob Sargent __ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Question
I believe hotmail does reverse-dns lookups. Don't know about mediaone[1]. The UNIX guys don't have to modify their boxes, they simply need to put a valid From: address[2], that's all. Serdar Soysal [1] Since MediaOne was bought out by ComCast, it is really a very bad test platform. ANYTHING can go wrong with ComCast. Their systems are in complete disarray and their tech support folks are completely clueless at best. It's like trying to have drunk squirrels troubleshoot a nuclear reactor leak. [2] If your company's internet presence (MX record) is crowley.com, they should be sending messages to the Internet from and address like username@crowley.com, not [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can give them a public folder with a certain valid username and tell them to use that email address in the From: field when they're sending. -Original Message- From: Billups, Mort [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Question The tests are to personal Internet email accounts (hotmail, mediaone). I also believe the failure of the lookups is the problem. The Unix guys aren't to excited about modifying their boxes, so I wanted to be sure it didn't have anything to do with the IMC or on our internal DNS. I am still researching. Thanks for your response. Mort Billups Crowley Maritime Corporation -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Question Tests to where? I'm thinking that if your IMC is configured to allow this machine by IP address, that error isn't being generated by your Exchange box, but by the remote host, which is trying to do a lookup on your Unix box and failing. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, March 01, 2002 10:23 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: SMTP Question Subject: SMTP Question Hi, Our Unix folks are trying to send mail via our Exchange IMC box. Their machine is allow to relay in the IMC routing configuration. In tests the mail fails delivery with an error message 553 5.1.8 Domain of sender address does not exist. The From address of the email has the FQDN of the server. I believe it fails because any reverse lookups will be unable to resolve the domain name in the From address. Do I understand this correctly? Just trying to do my homework. Mort Billups Crowley Maritime Corporation _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
