I'll be IN the office all next week, 'coz my mother-in-law is coming to
visit.
Neil Hobson
Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
LOL! (s'pose that means I'm in, otherwise I would be out, right?)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange digest: March 07, 2002
I'll be IN the office all next week,
You can give them OWA.
-Original Message-
From: Michel Fayad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:Using IMAP to connect to Exchange 2000 Server.
I am the administrator of an organization which have three
Is it possible to configure Exchange2000 OWA so that only a specific
group of users can access OWA?
Mike
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
162
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: Saturday, March 09, 2002 9:14 AM
Aan: Exchange Discussions
Onderwerp: Re: priv.edb gets bigger and bigger
How many users?
- Original Message -
From: Kiran, Murat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
problem solved.
1 mailbox was causing the problem because of the loop.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: Saturday, March 09, 2002 9:39 AM
Aan: Exchange Discussions
Onderwerp: RE: priv.edb gets bigger and bigger
I guess a huge mail
You can enable and disable OWA on per user bases.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tonazzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:OWA only for a defined group?
Is it possible to configure Exchange2000 OWA so that
Where can I find this option?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Montag, 11. März 2002 12:16
An: Exchange Discussions
Betreff: RE: OWA only for a defined group?
You can enable and disable OWA on per user bases.
-Original
Dear List,
I have posted this issue before, the problem still persist. Lots of user send mail to
brain.net.pk but my server unable to send it, first it send a delay message and then
with 4.4.7 error. I did nslookup/telnet but found nothing serious.
What can be the cause as this is the only
Take the user properties goto exchange advance tab on the protocol setting.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tonazzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:AW: OWA only for a defined group?
Where can I find this
I'm starting today to deploy my first exchange 2000 active/active
cluster. I read the white papers from Microsoft on how to set this up.
Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers. We have
7000 users in our exchange site now, which contains two servers. We
never have more
Have you tested any of this in a lab?
-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 8:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: An Active/Active cluster installation of exchange
I'm starting today to deploy my first exchange 2000
Ahhh yeah, in active/active with your boxes heavely loaded,ie high
memory usage on each of your nodes, you may find that they don't fail
over to each other. This may have been fixed by now, I'm not running a
cluster anymore (Yes Ed, I know ) so I haven't kept track on cluster
fixes.
Regards
Or try something like http://www.wickett.net/WNMailKeeper/ which will allow
you to archive to CD-ROM and read/search from CD-ROM. Quite cheap as well.
-Original Message-
From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 March 2002 12:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Burning
Hello,
i've a set of users in a win2k domain. these users reside in a custom
container in AD ( not in default Users container ). i've created a
recipient policy in exchange2000 that applies to this set of priviledged
users. now the problem is : whenever i add an email genration rule to
Don't do it.
Make it Active/Passive and everything will run much better. With the
current restrictions, there is NO advantage to running Active/Active.
Matter of fact, if you have better response time in Active/Active mode,
they you are pretty well guaranteed to have problems during fail-over.
California University of Pennsylvania, how does this work? 1,000 MAPI
users?
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Did I just say that out loud?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sabo, Eric
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:12 AM
To:
probably about the same way as Miami University of Ohio.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: An Active/Active cluster installation of exchange
California University of Pennsylvania,
I am totally missing something in this Picture.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Did I just say that out loud?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joel Musheno
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 6:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
You think your missing something? I went out Friday afternoon and woke
up Saturday in Washington Pennsylvania.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: An Active/Active cluster
As i understand it, the GWART is modified according to the routing table. I
deleted the gwart-file and after using recalculating route, the same gwart
was generated, according to the info from the routing table. So, modifying
the gwart will not work. The modifications will dissapear or is there a
Looking at setting up my test bed for E2K rollout and have a question
concerning storing the databases on a SAN device. Are there any special
considerations that I need to know up front when doing this. Currently we
mount the sharded SAN storage areas on each server
for personal data, etc..
Try rename the gwart0 file to something else and renaming the backup to
gwart0. something changed that is making your qwart file wrong.
- Original Message -
From: Mahesh Bharatsingh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:00 AM
Subject:
Depending where you came from, and what you drank on Friday that might
not be too bad.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Did I just say that out loud?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joel Musheno
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002
The gwart-file isn't wrong. I am using another server as bridgehead between
two sites and therefor deleted the unneeded x-400 connector and created
another one to the new bridgehead server.
The new route is added to the routing server (and the gwart). The old
connection is kept in the routing
We are named after a town in western pennsylvania.
California, PA Zip code 15419
We get that all the time, We tried to change the name but that was
stopped cause it adds uniqueness to our college.
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania
Ok that makes more sense to me.. Thanks. I can go back to bed now.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Did I just say that out loud?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sabo, Eric
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 7:21 AM
To: Exchange
There's also an Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: An Active/Active cluster installation of exchange
Ok that makes more sense to me..
Let me guess, Penn State is in Delaware...
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: An Active/Active cluster installation of exchange
There's also an Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
The GWART files (there are two) exist solely for human consumption. Modify
them they'll be overwritten. Delete them they'll be recreated. If something
is wrong in the GWART its because the engine is getting incorrect
information.
- Original Message -
From: Mahesh Bharatsingh [EMAIL
Planning on setting up E2K with the FE/BE configuration. Having two BE's
with 5 IS's each - one for each division to handle mailbox's.
FE server will handle OWA for remote mail users.
That will give me 10 seperate database for users mailbox's. All 10
databases will be SAN based.
Questions:
1. Directly? Yes. Or via another FE server.
2. Clustering.
Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244
Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne
1. Yes.
2. Not really.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:48 AM
Subject: Questions on Front End Backend Servers for E2K
Planning on setting up E2K with the FE/BE
So I updated Exchange 2000 to SP2 and now the Metabase won't load up.
Anyone else have this problem? I'm getting 3 errors in the log file and
here they are:
Here are the 3 errors I'm receiving
Metabase Update agent failed to start. Error code is 80040a01.
Event 1002
MSExchangeMU
The
I'm having a problem with users trying to log into OWA with IE 6. What
happens is they log in and then again it ask them for their password, it
does the repeatedly until they give up. But this doesn't happen with
other versions of IE. Anyone know what's going on?
Thanks
Chris Hummert
Use domainname\username to log in.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, March 11, 2002 8:56 AM
Posted To: DiscussionGroup
Conversation: OWA and IE6
Subject: OWA and IE6
I'm having a problem with
Search MS site.
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:55 AM
Subject: OWA and IE6
I'm having a problem with users trying to log into OWA with IE 6. What
happens is they log in and
Exchange 2000 does not apparently need the log on locally right for OWA to work.
However, you really should look at the NTFS permissions on the /exchweb virtual
directory. I experienced the same symptoms when, in an effort to tighten security, I
removed the Everyone has Full Control NTFS
Is there a way to rebuild the mta routing table, without using recalculate
route?
I have some wrong information in there.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Recalculate Routing for
I had a pretty similar thing and re-doing setup /domainprep solved the
problem. Some of the permissions needed by the server had mysteriously gone
missing after the sp2 install.
Andrew
--
From: Christopher Hummert[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
OR set the default domain in IIS
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and IE6
Use domainname\username to log in.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From:
Oh mighty IIS!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and IE6
OR set the default domain in IIS
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Recalcuate Routing is the exact same function as the one called
automatically.
Do a KCC, then recalc routing.
- Original Message -
From: Mahesh Bharatsingh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:08 AM
Subject: RE: Recalculate Routing
Could you walk me though how you did this?
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Maclaren,
Andrew
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Service Pack 2 Problem
I had a pretty similar thing and
Fdisk
Format c: /u
Put in Windows 95 CD
D:\win95\setup.exe
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Service Pack 2 Problem
Could you walk me though how you did this?
-Chris
I'm not part of the solution. I'm part of the problem
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Service Pack 2 Problem
Yea if your not going to help why don't you just crawl back
Are you seeing this in the application logs?
Process MAD.EXE (PID=952). All Domain Controller Servers in use are not
responding:
machine1.fqdn
machine2.fqdn
--
From: Christopher Hummert[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 11 March 2002
I know this is totally OT but how can I convert a project from MS
Project 95 to 2000?
Kim
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello:
I only do this with Project 98, but if you open it with Project
2000, and then try to save it, one of the choices in the FILE TYPE
drop down menu is for the current format or the 98 format.
Robert J. Razler, Esq.
Approvals Manager
No I haven't seen that
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Maclaren,
Andrew
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Service Pack 2 Problem
Are you seeing this in the application logs?
Process
:;high five::
-Original Message-
From: Milton R. Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Service Pack 2 Problem
That is an understatement.
Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation.
-Original Message-
From:
Now! I really have a taste for some Pretzel bread...
Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Service Pack 2
Come on down. Can you get here by noon?
-Original Message-
From: Milton R. Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Service Pack 2 Problem
Now! I really have a taste for some Pretzel bread...
Milton R Dogg
Of The
Hello
Is there a way of deleting a specific email recieved by some
users. There was an email that a lot of users got of gambling and casinos.
i just want to know if there is a way of deleting that message from
peoples mailbox through administrator. I am using exchange 5.5 sp3
You could use ISScan from MS. But it would probably be more trouble than it
is worth.
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: deleting mail
Hello
Is there a way
exmerge and isscan and mailbox manager can possibly all help.
http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q246916
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:35 AM
To:
Send out an email to all users, telling them to delete this message.
Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Thomas
Contr 911 SPTG/SC
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Exmerge.
--
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 12:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: deleting mail
Hello
Is there a way of deleting a specific email recieved by some
users. There was
mixed Exchange
IMC is on 5.5 SP4 server (no users - but it was the first server in the 5.5
org)
Want to move it to ex2k sp2
I am looking for documentation/information on moving an active IMC from a
5.5 server to a 2000 server. Include the usual, i.e. least downtime.
Ali Wilkes
Borders Group,
Yea if your not going to help why don't you just crawl back into your hole
-Original Message-
From: Milton R. Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: deleting mail
Send out an email to all users, telling them to
Should be already working. You might want to increase the cost of the
5.5 IMS to clear the queues and then eventually delete it. Also just
move the MX record to the other server.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, March 11, 2002 1:41
I'm not part of the solution. I'm part of the problem - Martin
Blackstone March 11
Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Q260037 XADM: How to Remove a Message from Exchange by Using the ExMerge
Utility
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
New York, NY 10012
tel. (212) 842-8849
fax. (212) 842-8843
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
View the DataSynapse email
In place upgrade or new machine?
William
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: move IMC from 5.5 to 2k
mixed Exchange
IMC is on 5.5 SP4 server (no users - but it was the first server
::high five::
-Original Message-
From: Milton R. Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: deleting mail
I'm not part of the solution. I'm part of the problem - Martin
Blackstone March 11
Milton R Dogg
Of
You don't move it. You create a second MX record in DNS pointing to the new
SMTP connector. Once you verify it is working properly remove the other MX
record and decommision the old connector. No downtime at all.
- Original Message -
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
Perhaps I dont' understand what you're asking but what is so hard about
running setup /domainprep?
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:38 AM
Subject: RE: Service Pack 2 Problem
Who is the 911 SPTG/SC? What support group is that?
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 1:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: deleting mail
Hello
Is there a way of deleting a specific email
In attempting to fix a Free/Busy issue I noticed that one user, the user
that was having Free/Busy issues had a different legacyExchangeDN value.
The top one was the old one and the bottom on was the one I replaced it
with.
/o=DOMAIN Exchange Organization/ou=First Administrative
Since I've upgraded my Exchange 2000 server to SP2, every 15 minutes I
got an error in the Application Log of the server. The error is the
following:
Microsoft Exchange System Attendant failed to read the membership of
group 'cn=Exchange Domain Servers,cn=Users,dc=jobdomain'. Error code
(Pre-PS: Everything was fine when I ran Ex 5.5 =)
So at home I have MSEx 2000-SP2 running on Win 2k Server-SP2. Everything is
working fine when using OL 2002 as the client. But there are issues with
OWA:
*Trying to use OWA internally (http://ExchBox/exchange) I get the OWA page,
but I don't
Do you need some help?
Alain Buffello
Compaq Computer (Suisse) S.à.r.l. - Genève
* Voice:Office No.: +41 22.7095262
* Fax: +41 22 709.5391
* Compaq Exchange Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:
We have exchange 5.5 and all users are receiving duplicate e-mails in
their mailboxes. We have upgraded to sp4 but this has not fixed the issue.
Also, a fix suggested to delete the queue.dat file has not fixed the issue
either - has anyone any ideas? Running Windows NT Server sp6a. Event
Viewer
After installing monthly sophos upgrade and associated ide files to my
Exchange 5.5 server the Event Service, Information Store, Internet Mail
Service and Message Transfer Agent will not start. (Thus HotMail!)
Have had several errors including 7000, 7001, 7024 and errors 2140 and
4021. Some of
Further to this discussion Microsoft only sends security bulletins to
people who subscribe to the Microsoft Product Security Notification
Service. These always have the subject:
Microsoft Security Bulletin MSxx-xxx (where the x is a number).
Also the message body is PGP signed and starts
I would get on the phone with Sophos. Then MS before just diving into a DR,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 8:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Most services won't start after sophos ide install
After installing
Yes, I would like to see these in a size 11 please.
-Original Message-
From: Buffello, Alain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 8:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: An Active/Active cluster installation of exchange
Do you need some help?
Alain Buffello
Could the lady see the latex thong in black please.
-Original Message-
From: Buffello, Alain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: An Active/Active cluster installation of exchange
Do you need some help?
Alain Buffello
What does the application event log say, more specifically?
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 8:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Most services won't start after sophos ide install
After installing monthly
Some of my users are reporting that instead of getting a message text in the
body of the message they get an envelope icon with 'untitled document' as
the name.
We are running Exchange 5.5 with service pack 4 on NT 4.0 machines with
service pack 6a. The clients are Outlook 2000 and Outlook
.EML files? Nimda?
-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Envelope icon in message text area
Some of my users are reporting that instead of getting a message text in the
body of the
I was attempting to send an email to a PSS engineer when I received the
following NDR info. To receive this NDR while attempting to discuss an
Exchange problem this does not make one feel warm and fuzzy???
Well, one of these came from a Microsoft rep and it was a web page
newsletter. So, I don't think Nimda is the answer.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Envelope icon in
Since PSS has absolutely no input or administrative control over the
microsoft.com domain, including the Exchange servers, your lack of warm
fuzzies is ill-placed.
- Original Message -
From: Michel, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March
You've misinterpreted a sarcastic jab at a company that millions enjoy
mocking but, in my experience, provides a very reliable and stable product
when administered with any amount of intelligence.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March
IMAP or POP access is good if the user is not using different workstations
all the time.
Otherwise:
XGEN: Setting Up Outlook Express to Access an Exchange 2000 Server (Q229801)
http://support.microsoft.com/search/preview.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q229801
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original
I had the same thing during a support call earlier today. (getting a
'ghosted' 5.5 server out of my 2000 environment, for all who care)
I'm still having the same problem with event id 1706 (see below) which
i've found numerous posts in usenet asking about, and no one seems to
know anything
Unfortunately sarcasm doesn't translate well in this medium.
- Original Message -
From: Michel, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:34 PM
Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS?
You've misinterpreted a sarcastic jab at a company that
Why another 245 quatloos? The case is open until _you_ say it's fixed.
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Pinquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:39 PM
Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS?
I had the same thing during a support call
OL rules and such are, of course, marginally effective at blocking spam from
the Inbox. Removing the target smtp address from the mailbox (mbx) is much
more effective. I offer both as remedies to prevent spam to those suffering
from it.
Opt. 1: OL Rule
- Create a client-side rule which directs
nope, i've tried to finagle them before - they're pretty specific about
what they'll fix on an issue. Generally if they have to transfer you to
another group, unless the problem is directly related, they'll not
really help you out. ymmv i suppose.
jeremy
-Original Message-
From: Daniel
That's not really true in my experience. If it's a remotely related issue or
symptom, PSS has always included it in the same case for me. I've been
bounced from group to group, even had cases open for months on which PSS
personnel spent dozens - maybe hundreds, who knows - of hours, and never
1. Is the user with the issue on a different Exchange Mailbox server then
the one you referenced?
2. Was the user, with the issue, on an Exchange Server that was upgraded
from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Andrey,
1. Perfect mask...could be, which still sounds to me like people from one
domain can't see the other domain.
2. Duh! How stupid of me...
When I finally broke your logic statement down to resemble a nested-IF
statement, it made sense to me:
(
(
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a. Outlook 98.
I have a user who is missing his calendar information for 2002. It was
there yesterday, gone today.
His calendar information from 2001 is still there, and all his Inbox/Sent
Items/Deleted Items are
current. For some reason, just his 2002 calendar
I just retired from MS after eight years in support. I know what I'm talking
about.
You called in with a specific issue. As long as you're not presenting a
laundry list of issues that case is not closed until that specific issue is
resolved. That it may need to go to another group is irrelevant.
Ahhh you must know what I am talking about.
1) No same Exchange server
2) YES, and used MS migration tool. I have issues with this account
previously where I had to edit the home server in ADSI when I moved it.
- John Q Jr.
There is a movie about me?
- Original Message -
From: Leonard
..since many of us call pss from time to time - there was this time when
i was attempting to add another DC to my network, and while working on
the ADS-related issue, the Server blue screened on a boot. I was
transferred to a hardware guy, who told me to do what i suspected, (boot
w/ a floppy
Calendar Cache Problem...
Check for OST sync...
Archive Run with params...
Client is not telling you all the information...
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 2002 Calendar
What's a calendar cache?
-Original Message-
From: Nikki Peterson - ITCX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 1:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 2002 Calendar Information Gone
Calendar Cache Problem...
Check for OST sync...
Archive Run with params...
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
