hai,
We are using Exchange server 5.5 server $ outlook 2000 client.In OL2000 the
subject field i Can be modify the contents.I want disable this issue.If U
have any information please tell me.
Thanks
S.Sekaran
-Original Message-
From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
DIsabling rerouting mail should work, unless you're doing something funky
with mail routing. With it disabled, the IMC will do a directory lookup of
all addresses that it knows, and if it doesn't find the address it will
reject it.
What entries are in your routing table in the IMS? How is the MX
Its only an open relay if reroute incoming mail is enabled. If not, I don't
believe its an open relay.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original
Use this URL to setup an external test on your mail system. You can
test your system without being blacklisted.
SB
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 2:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: People using my IIS SMTP relay
Might help if I included the URL -- OPs!
http://www.abuse.net/relay.html
-Original Message-
From: STEVE BROOK
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 2:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: People using my IIS SMTP relay
Use this URL to setup an external test on your mail
Uninstall FTP :
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of jojo.solis
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How to Block port 21
How to block port 21 (FTP Port) in
Hehe... I was wondering where the link was in the first message. Anyway,
I tested it out (I had to register on the site first) and it told me the
host (me) DOES appear to accept messages for relay. Not good.
Ok, I still don't understand why I could not relay myself from my home PC.
When I
I am having a very weird problem, and I cant put my finger on what may be
the problem. I need advice on how to proceed.
I have a single domain, 3 server site. 1 server mailbox
storage(Postoffice01), 1 server registered SMTP(Postoffice02), and 1 server
invisible SMTP(postoffice03). 01 is
Thanks Roger for clearing that up. Have a great Turkey Day tomorrow.
Nate
--
From: Roger Seielstad
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 08:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication
Correct - you can't
Sure sounds like the box has lost access to all global catalog servers, but
that's just a guess.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
Set default to contributor, which is post only (can't read). Alternately,
set default to none, and set the people who should be able to send these
messages as contributor.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine
Try to connect the server, which is no longer exist.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing Site Connector and Directory
Replication Connector
What happens when
Check CDOLive.com for info on CDO stuff - if its not there, it probably
isn't published anywhere.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
Because there are no other clients that do the following wel;
-calendaring (especially shared)
-Task Management
-Offline emulation of online mode
IMAP is nice, but you have to be online for it to work.
POP3 sucks no matter what you do with it.
What did you have in mind?
search technet for 'cleansweep' and run it against the boss' mailbox.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: gaby [mailto:[EMAIL
Listers,
I have a situation where I need to import a whole bunch of email data in
to Exchange 5.5. or Exchange 2k, not fussy.
The problem with the data is the way it is formatted, although I can
have it hosed in to a SQL server/access database etc. then reformatted.
The format of the data
Won't work, because it was most likely set as a delegate, not a rule.
Gotta use cleansweep
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
Is there a reason you need it in the server.
Depending on the size with that data you could Send it all to the server
with a script and something like BLAT.
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam
Yep. Its covered in the FAQ, but you can set static ports (at least in 5.5)
for the IS, DS, SA, and MTA.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original
Not directly in Exchange.
With E2k, you could write a protocol sink[1] that intercepts the HELO and
MAIL FROM commands, but I haven't seen anyone pushing forward with this type
of solution (at least not publicly), since it requires coding in C/C++ or
Delphi.
Ideally, I'd love to see someone
I like the BLAT idea. Interesting.
The reason I need it on the server/PST's is because I'm migrating a
custom made UNIX system (written in COBOL) to Exchange server.
I like the BLAT / Script train of thought.
The file currently has 75000 records/or messages. Pure plain text, so
that makes it
Before you go hog wild with this, we've enabled this functionality (with our
Unix relays, not Exchange) more than once.
I would estimate that 20-30% of the mail hosts that try to pass mail have
misconfigured DNS, and depending on how strict the option is, that means
that 20-30% of your inbound
For the scenario you describe, MSW is definitely the way to go.
Rehome all public folders off the boxes to be migrated. Do an arseload of
backups, and pull the trigger. Only changing the site isn't that big a deal,
frankly.
--
Roger D.
Nope
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: John Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 7:19 PM
bash-2.04$ whois bayareabioinformatics.com
Whois Server Version 1.3
Domain names in the .com, .net, and .org domains can now be registered
with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net
for detailed information.
No match for BAYAREABIOINFORMATICS.COM.
Last update of
Yeah that would a no brainier..
I would just tell them all they lost there email :
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
What the heck is that data?!?!?
Anyway, you should be able to format it in such a way that you can import it
into Outlook - take a look at Slipstick.com and see what Sue has as
reference. MSDN might have something too.
--
Roger D. Seielstad -
you will lose the dates, however, because they are new messages at that
point.
You could also drop a properly formatted message into the IMC queues, which
might keep the dates, but its hit or miss, and I can't remember the exact
format it needs to be in.
The data is from an in house custom mail system written in Cobol
One way to avoid exchange, write your own mail system!!
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 November 2001 16:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migration of mail data
Use SMTP to mail it in
If you are even a bit programming savvy, use Perl's text manipulation
features to slice dice the email files as desired, then use the Net::SMTP
module to send to the appropriate recipient.
You might be able to use NT's native batch file tools to do the text
manipulation
exchange 5.5, sp3, nt4, sp6a
4 sites, 5-7 servers in a site
NYC site consists of 3 servers in New York, Boston, Washington,
Philadelphia, Charlotte (56k links and up).
e-mails from New York to Boston take up to 20 minutes to be delivered. I
created a test message with delivery receipt on and
Everyone has probably already left on vacation. Have a nice thanksgiving
everyone.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
Not us poor slobs...
We are always the last to go.
Our building is pretty empty today too.
And the boss is gone.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Hey, in the early 80's I wrote a mail system in FORTRAN on the HP/1000
series computers. It was fairly limited, but had a pretty slick user
interface (user name lookups based on soundex codes, check status of sent
mail, etc).
Then we bought a big HP unix mini (an 850 if memory serves) and we
Today is the best
Nobody here to support
Drool all over desk
-Original Message-
From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: turkey
Not us poor slobs...
We are always the last to go.
Our building is
not us, we will be here friday as well. So happy thanksgiving everybody
and happy hangovers on friday, me.
-Original Message-
From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: turkey
Not us poor slobs...
No, not everyone - at least, not here in the UK... :-)
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 21 November 2001 16:52
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: turkey
Subject: turkey
Everyone has probably already left on vacation. Have a nice
Happy Thanks Giving Mr Bush America!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/bush/graphic/0,7367,602463,00.html
-Original Message-
From: Joel Musheno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 November 2001 16:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: turkey
not us, we will be here friday as well. So
Depends on which version of IE you are using, but in 5 above, the
options/security tab shows icons for Internet/Intranet/Trusted and
Restricted sites. Which is your OWA site? Intranet or Internet?
Whichever type, set a Custom level. WYYY down the bottom of the
next list is the option for
Have you set your own domain as inbound under the IMC Routing tab? Are people who try
to send to you getting NDRs, and if so, what do they say?
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Andy Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:35
To: Exchange Discussions
exchange 5.5 sp4, win2K sp2, I deleted a mailbox wich was a secretary in
the compant.
her boss had a rule that all his meetings will forward to her.
now every time someone sends him a meeting he get a replay mailbox cant
be found (or something like that)...
I tried everythimg i know -
work exchange 5.5 with active directory?
Roni
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Precision Team
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to Block port 21
hai,
We are using Exchange server 5.5
I've also had this problem, and I had to recreate the user, log in as them and remove
all of their
rules as well.
Jon
-Original Message-
From: gaby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 November 2001 07:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: weired problem
exchange 5.5 sp4, win2K sp2,
As in a pop3 account?? Or Etrn?
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Simon
Stephenson
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K
Hi,
Can anyone help, Is there a way
I don't want to work.
I just want to bang on my drum all day.
-Original Message-
From: Roni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to Block port 21
work exchange 5.5 with active directory?
Roni
-Original
What's going on on the routing page of the IMS? How about on the
connections page of the IMS?
-Original Message-
From: Andy Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMC - no inbound mail
I'm setting up a new IMC
Hrmm, that reminds me... I DO have Dark Age of Camelot here... yes, time to
lock myself in the server room behind the rack in my special place and fire
up the old Dell...
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:27 *
Not to mention the extra time it takes resolving it on each and every
incoming email. Well, I guess there IS the local DNS cache, so if most
of your mail comes from a core group of customers, no big deal. But it
WILL slow down your SMTP services.
-tom
-Original Message-
From: Roger
Exchange 5.5 w/ SP4. The following Event ID is written to the Event
Viewer's Application Log on my Exchange Server twice a day. Once at
10:00am and 3:00pm. I realized that my Storage Warnings are set to
occur twice a day at these specific times.
I was unable to find any information in TechNet
Whenever one of my users opens/executes the Outlook program, (which is
several times a day -- this user choses to exit the Outlook Program and
doesn't minimize it) the following entry on the Exchange Server Event
Viewer's Application Log is written to:
Event Type:Failure Audit
I've searched technet to no avail; I've got a 3-site 5.5(Sp4) org connected
via smtp to another group of sites; different domain, one org.; no PF
replicas on each other's sites other than org forms; very frequently, each
or our servers with a Public store will send a message out to servers in
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec4.htm
Read the whole FAQ while you are there, please!
-Original Message-
From: Ward Sidney - siwa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Email Archiving
Hello everyone. Can
That's what you have Outlook (or other POP3 client) for.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Stephenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K
Hi,
Can anyone help, Is there a way to get Exchange 2000 to dial the internet
Why yes, almost anyone on this list CAN recommend a product. Especially
since they can all easily read the FAQ (see link at bottom of all messages).
-Original Message-
From: Ward Sidney - siwa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Do you use Outlook?
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K
That's what you have Outlook (or other POP3 client) for.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Stephenson
Sometimes, but mostly feel like it uses me. And I don't even get a kiss.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K
Do you use Outlook?
-Original Message-
From: Doug
Maybe you just have a bad outlook :)
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 15:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K
Sometimes, but mostly feel like it uses me. And I don't even
get a kiss.
-Original
Yes I was
JoeF
-Original Message-
From: STEVE BROOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Offline Folders Unavailable
Where are you checking to find the option greyed out?
SB
-Original Message-
From: Fred
Where does it mention Archiving on that page? It talks about deleting
attachements and reading the Archives, but nothing about archiving products
or procedures.
b.t.w. IMHO, 4.6 should be changed to say that Sybari and Trend are the de
facto standards. Seems like more and more folk around
Deleting JDoe's profile and recreating it made the problem dissapear for me.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Mary I. Bollhofer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Failure Audit - Event ID 1023
Whenever one of my users
Can't see this in my IMC tab...
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:29 AM
Subject: RE: Disclaimer
Who's asking?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
Try searching here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=engroup=microsoft.public.exchange
I found quite a few hits with suggestions on what to look for.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Mary I. Bollhofer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:53 PM
To: Exchange
In hawaii you are always on vacation. Nice and warm.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 2:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: turkey
Not in Hawaii
Vacations start tomorrow
But pager is on.
:(
-Ben-
Ben M.
Write it up and submit it to the FAQ maintainers. They love the feedback...
In fact most of the FAQs are based on someone saying ... should be in the
FAQ.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From:
Is there a way to migrate a single Exchange 5.5 server from one domain to
another? We are looking at restructuring our domains and will be creating
a new domain on a new server and recreating all domain accounts. The
Exchange server is a member server in the old domain.
Thanks,
JR
Thanks for reply - the routing page shows some limits on who can reroute
via the smtp - but as I understand it that only applies to routing to
foreign domains, not to inbound traffic. On the connections page I just
have the address of our isp as a forwarder - all mail goes out fine so
we're sure
Thanks for the reply - yes our own domain is set as inbound. No NDR's yet
as the mail servers who are trying to send haven't given up trying yet -
we are just seeing an increasing amount of connection attempts. It really
does seem as though all is working except the IMC responding to the
inbound
As your Exchange Server is only a member server I don't see any reason not
to just change the domain - as long as it can reach a domain controller in
the domain where the user accounts are to authenticate the mailbox owners
etc. all should still work. Beware of removing the exchange service
We are evaluating archive products.
Current products we are thinking about evaluating
C2C Archive One --uses Exchange public folder back-end servers for the
archive
www.c2c.com
KVS Kvault --not proprietary, uses .msg files on NTFS with the zedlib
compression library, SQL front end
Good point...it's great to be able to watch the waves, surf and sun...but
not as much fun to watch them from the 16th floor of our building while
reinstalling a pesky document management system. :)
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong
Precisely why we chose not to go with this kind of solution -- tempted
though we were.
We do let MailSweeper reject some of the more egregarious spam hosts but
generally we have to err on the side of letting mail in; rather than risk
blocking legitimate client mail.
Aloha,
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr,
I am going to move from 5.5 to Exchange 2000 Server...
What speed PC do I have to use as the Active Directory Communicator?
Thanks all!
Adriaan Van Huissteden
Network Administrator
Connect Credit Union
Phone: (03) 6233 0660
I have run it on an amd dx4 133 with 128 megs of ram.
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Van Huissteden,
Adriaan
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000
73 matches
Mail list logo
