Hi !
I have an Exchange Server behind a FW, and I would like for my users to
connect
through the FW as an Exchange Client and read mail and calender.
Which port on the FW shoul I open up ? Which portnumbers do ExchangeClient
use.
Running Win2k/E2k and Outlook2000.
Thanks.
Ronny
You really don't want to do what you're asking - it's a security nightmare
to just let Outlook pass natively through the firewall.
You'd be much happier if you created a virtual private networking
connection.
Go to http://www.microsoft.com and do a search for VPN.
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr,
One of my users keeps a record of each employee's birthday in her OL2K
Calendar. These are set up as recurring appointments that fire off on
the appropriate date. All was working fine until recently. Now when she
starts OL at the beginning of the day all these reminders fire off almost
Hi !
I realy needs help here
My system was open for relaying befor I closed it down
Now, after closing it down, I can't get ridd of all the Queues.
I have 815 Queues, and each has 1 massage in the Queue.
Help me get this out of my system. Hoe do I do this.
By the way, I'm a newbe.
Thanks for the responses guys.
Looking into these now.
FYI, I am advised the interorg tool should do all of it.
Regards
RB
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Nt Server 4 sp6a
Exchange 5.5 sp3
1 organization / 2 sites (site A + site B) / in each site 1 server(server
A + server B).
I want to move the public folders and the mailboxes from server A (site A)
to server B (site B).
I have no idea how to begin with it. (I have few knowledge of Exchange -
Can Outlook 98 client be used with Exchange 2000 server?
Thank!
Robert
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
I have checked everything and still get the same error when sending to an
external mail system. Exch 5.5 sp4 with O2k as client. I have all mail
going through the IMC to be sent in plain text. Anyone have any insight?
Thanks.
_
Here is more info. I have a client who was sending *.docs to another person
external to us using rich text. I have the IMC to convert everything to
plain text. We are still getting the Conversion to Internet format failed
error.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael
Do you receive this error in the event log or from an NDR? If NDR, please
post the full message. Or post the full event log error. Does this happen
with every external mail sent?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original
How's he sending them? As attachments? Or copying and pasting?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 March 2002 13:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Yes, and so can the old Exchange 4.0 and 5.0 clients.
One of the only differences I am aware of is that older clients (clients
older than Outlook 98 with the security patch) will always ask an
Exchange 2000 server for the name of the GC server, whereas the newer
clients will initially ask the
Here are the event Ids. It doesn't happen on every mail sent. Its random.
It looks like they are copied and pasted. Thanks.
Event ID: 4116
An error was returned from the messaging software the Internet Mail Service
uses to process messages on the Microsoft Exchange Server. It is possible
This page concerning the particular error has some links to articles that
could help your situation.
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=4116source=
I would personally ask the client to send .docs as attachments though.
Converting some word documents that use a particular font into plain
What would be the difference in sending as attachments vs copy and paste?
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed
This page concerning the
I guess this is a simple one, but I just can't find it quickly.
Win2K, E2K
Is it possible to set up an mail account for POP3/SMTP without a user? I just need an
mail account, nothing else. What is the smart way to to it?
Thanx for hints
all the best
Elmer
--
Elmer Stöwer
CyberConsult -
When you send as attachments, you keep the .docs as .docs and they aren't
converted into plain text when going through your IMC. When they are copied
and pasted into an email, they cease to be .doc's, they become part of the
body of the email. And will only be able to be viewed via an email
What is the purpose for doing this?
- Original Message -
From: Elmer Stöwer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:05 AM
Subject: pop3 but no user on 2k
I guess this is a simple one, but I just can't find it quickly.
Win2K, E2K
Is
Folks,
I'm looking for practical experience from anyone running 'minimal'
hardware configurations for domain controllers in an AD forest supporting
Exchange 2000/5.5.
We are currently very cash strapped but really do need to move on
Exchange 2000 from our current Exchange 5.5
That makes sense. Thanks for the help:)
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed
When you send as attachments, you keep the .docs as .docs and they
You willing to maybe lose an email or three?
Stop the SMTP service.
Go to explorer, navigate to \exchsrvr\mailroot\vsi1\queueus
Delete the 815 files you find in there that have a time/date stamp =
whenever you locked your system down.
Or, if you're a glutton for punishment, you can do it the
No. A mailbox in E2k is tied to a user. Always a 1:1 relationship. So make a user
called FakeUser, and give it whatever SMTP address you want.
-Original Message-
From: Elmer Stöwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 08:05 AM
Posted To: MSExchange
A few comments:
* Global Catalog - Load generated by Exchange 2000. Does the Workstation
have enought RAM and CPU power to handle the load? It looks like this may
become your weakest link in the whole system.
* If you absolutely have to use a workstation as a DC/GC...try to get three
of them
1000 users? You could do that with a workstation, if you needed to. As
you said, my only concern would be fault tolerance.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Mackenzie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 08:18 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Query the gal via LDAP. There are a number of perl mods that should allow
that.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Having a test account for a software project. The software is sending and receiving
mail to an account and doesnt need any other access rights.
So I have to create a fake user and to take care, that this user has no rights to any
other ressource. Sometimes it is good to know that something is
anyone know what this means?
Event Type: Warning
Event Source: MSExchangeTransport
Event Category: SMTP Protocol
Event ID: 1706
Date: 3/4/2002
Time: 10:02:46 AM
User: N/A
Computer: MAILBOX
Description:
EXPS is temporarily unable to provide
Besides, it isn't as simple as just opening some ports. Exchange does some
dynamic port opening. So you have to edit the registry to force certain
ports on the Exch server.
Plus you have to open 135, which is not a safe move.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Any Any
Amit Zinman
MCSE,
Project Manager
Professional Services Group
Getronics (Israel)
Tel: +972-3-5127306
Mobile: +972-53-570139
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ronny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:46 AM
To: Exchange
Hello All,
We have Exchange 5.5 sp 4 on NT 4 server.
Starting last week we are getting messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
it causes errors 4130 and 4070 on IMC that it's not able to move the message
to archive. I have added this address to filter and delete in IMS.
Somehow, it's not doing it.
I followed the Microsoft article on preventing mail relay on exchange 5.5
and went to a couple different sites that check your server for you to see
if relaying is open, BUT. I get outbound mail failure notifications
from email that was not sent out by any of our employees Reason for
I believe that's covered in the FAQ.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: James Lavoie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: testing
See Q231737 and make sure you don't have a file based AV scanner running
against the Exchange working directories.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Sandhya Pai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
No.
William
-Original Message-
From: Elmer Stöwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 6:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: pop3 but no user on 2k
I guess this is a simple one, but I just can't find it quickly.
Win2K, E2K
Is it possible to set up an mail
You sooo bad!
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!
***
WARNING: Unencrypted electronic mail is not secure and may not be authentic.
If you have any doubts
I have Outlook 2000 in which the client is running an application through
public folders. To make this application work, all clients must be able to
work offline using an .ost file. When I go to the clients that are on a
desktop, the option for the .ost is no longer available. I found Q246052
I am running Win2K Office2K, and I can setup to use an .ost if I like.
The option is under Tools, Services, then Microsoft Exchange Server,
Properties, Advanced. You will see a checkbox the says 'Enable Offline
Use'.
Is that checkbox there?
Hope this helps,
David
-Original Message-
No, it's not available. Not there at all.???
Regards,
LaCretia Sandoval
Dallas LAN Administrator
Triaton, NA, Inc.
972-443-4027
___
-Original Message-
From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:42 AM
To:
We run a script here that makes massive changes and I wasn't sure if it's
caused by the script or what? If they tell me what is in the script they
told me they would have to kill me.
LaCretia
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
Good thinking on the IDE Raid! Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 March 2002 14:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADS DC hardware
A few comments:
* Global Catalog - Load generated by Exchange 2000. Does the Workstation
have enought
Then you need to pass the problem onto them. If they are so unwilling to
help, then they will need to pick up the slack.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OST option not
Read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html and digest carefully.
Emails with a From: header are delivery notification messages.
RFC2822 says mailers must accept these messages (they can, if I
recall correctly, do what they like with them). There are an
awful lot on non-RFC2822-compliant mail
Serdar,
In your message below, you indicate that you, logged all of our internet
mail... What program did you use to log your mail? Currently, I have
Promodag...would that do it?
Jim Blunt
Network / E-mail Admin
Network / Infrastructure Group
Bechtel Hanford, Inc.
509-372-9188
There are
Oops, rfc2821... Slip of the finger and brain...
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 March 2002 17:10
To: Exchange Discussions
That's why I am asking if this is this way by default or if it's just my
environment. If I determine it's my environment, I will make them take
ownership of the problem. I have to prove that first.
LaCretia
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
And, of course, servers that don't exist except in the fertile imagination of some
spammer are unlikely to accept any NDRs.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Exchange 2000 SP2. I have a user account that is all of a sudden being
locked out. I discovered the first instance on Friday when the user could
not log in. I checked the account to day and found it was locked out again.
What logging can I turn on to figure out why this is happening. Other
Sounds like someone else is trying to login as them. Try turning on auditing
and log login success and failures to see if that is what's happening.
- Original Message -
From: James Liddil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:18 PM
Depending on how you have your ADC set, is NTDSNoMatch supposed to create a
disabled user account for the mailbox that has NTDSNoMatch in Custom
Attribute 10?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Has anyone had problems adding 2K/E2K accounts in a multiple child domain
environment. Seems when I create the user account from the Domain controller
that has the Exchange server and I create the user in the child domain, the
create exchange mailbox appears but the email account does not show up
I assume you ran /domainprep on the child domain, or you wouldn't be
able to create the mailboxes at all for that domain. Put in your
Exchange CD in the DC of the child domain. Run setup and select
administrative tools. Apply pertinent service pack. Now your MMC will
have the correct display
Fairly Correct.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q274173
The multimb.exe utility can be used to identify those as well.
William
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
It's my understanding that setting custom attribute 10 merely tells the
ADC to create a disabled account for that mailbox. In addition, the ADC
creates disabled accounts by default, but it is possible to configure
the ADC to create enabled accounts (assuming you have no password
security policy
If one was to upgrade a NT4.0 domain to a child domain then after running
the 2000 upgrade then the Exchange CD should be put in to after and run that
same procedure. If that newly created child domain was under the top level
domain where the E2K server resides?
- Original Message -
Just remembered that I did not run domainprep on the child domain prior to
loading the tool. I got the email prompt from the main domain. Is it OK you
think to run domain prep on the child domain after the fact.?
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
Have you created an RUS for the child domain?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 March 2002 17:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Child Domains and account creation
Just remembered that I did not run domainprep on the child domain prior to
No. I have only one Exchange server. It resides above all other child
domains.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Harford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:55 PM
Subject: RE: Child Domains and account creation
Have you created an
I looked at that q article and that's not our problem because everything
else works fine and we only use exchange aware scanner (Antigen) in our
server.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Good afternoon,
Outlook 98 NT 5.5 SP4.
Mary Taylor did not want to be on the global address list as Mary any
longer. She said all of her friends knew her as MJ. SO I changed her from
Taylor Mary to Taylor MJ. Now her name does not resolve when I key in MJ
Taylor as where Mary Taylor did
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Regarding #2, your argument is valid for Exchange 5.5, but
with Exchange 2000 and multiple databases your time to
recovery shouldn't be a function of the number of mailboxes
on the server but the number in a database.
Either someone else is trying to logon as that user. One common thing we
have seen is that people will use their personal accounts for service
accounts (these are developers, not IT). After they change the password, the
service account will do something that requires authentication.
On this site, we have people that move around all over the place. Today,
they could be logged into a turnaround machine downtown, tomorrow they could
be logged into their machine 45 minutes away, out in the field. A lot of
times, they log into the turnaround machine, lock it and walk away to go
Thanks for the tips. Ran domainprep on the child domain ( made sure logged
in as right person) Created RUS. Yes found out you need this even if you
have only one Exchange server and are trying to work with child domains
without an exchange server.
You still need to /domainprep all your child domains, and you still need
a RUS for each.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:52 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Child Domains and account creation
When running Exch2k in 5.5 org, what address book view is used? Can you
specify? 5.5 or 2k?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
Let me reprase. I know exch2k is used. Can you use 5.5 as well?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
No. Those are strictly LDAP queries against the Active Directory. So
Exch2k isn't really used either.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:58 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Global Address
Nevermind, I answered my own question.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Child Domains and account creation
You still need to /domainprep all your child domains, and you still need
It depends on what user is connecting to his or her exchange server. If you
are on 5.5 you get the 55 Address Book View. If you are on 2k, you get its
ABV. Weird.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:07 PM
To: Exchange
Again everything worked fine, but now another problem arose. When a user
created in the child domain tries and access the email from the OWA client
it does not let him in. The IIS server running OWA services is also in the
top domain. It will work if I put in the child domain name. (xxx.xxx) but
I just took a look at my exchange servers, and one of them was pegged at
100%. Now that is not an unusual occurence, but the fact that the
dsamain.exe was hogging up most of the CPU was something that struck me as
odd. Anyone know what would cause the dsamain.exe to start hogging CPU?
Chris
No. You're saying you have a user JOE in domain CHILD, but you want him
to login as PARENT\JOE. I think. Is that what you're saying?
You can make a new http virtual server for the child domain, then set
the default domain for that domain as CHILD, then tell them to ignore
the domain if they
Is she on the same server you are? It may just be replication delay.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: changed display NAME AND
Good afternoon,
Outlook 98 NT 5.5
Sorry to bother the list so much. I am currently reconfiguring our ABV
because our old one was set up wrong. Is it alright to change the display
name of the Org.? I have tested and do not see any problems yet. Of course
I am testing on a test box. Thanks.
Yes, you can change it.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Address Book View
Sorry to bother the list so much. I am currently reconfiguring our ABV
because our old one was set
Well I see your point. Never tried it before but sure I can give it a try.
Time to turn the page to that section. I'll let you know.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:12 PM
Subject: RE:
Is there a good statistics reporting tool for Exchange server 5.5 and IMS
for SMTP traffic? Is there any freeware that can do? Thanks.
YW
_
Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
Performance Monitor.
Installing Exchange adds lots of neat counters.
Crystal Reports.
Exchange5.5 ships with a trimmed down Crystal Reports app to generate these
kinds of things.
William Lefkovics
-Original Message-
From: Wei Yan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002
Reread your response. To your first statement the is Yes. I want them to log
in as the parent domain even though there account resides in a child domain.
Is this possible still making a new Virtual?
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
No.
Parent\jsmith is just as different from child\jsmith as it is from
child\cliff_yablonski. In other words, way different. They're not the
same.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 01:40 PM
Posted To: MSExchange
Is that server a bridgehead server? Maybe it's replicating.
Serdar Soysal
PS: If it's common for your servers to peg at 100% CPU, maybe you should
consider getting faster/more processors.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002
You have multiple options. Read up on move server wizard. I've never used
that so I'm sure somebody else would have more valuable information on that.
I personally would use ExMerge to move the users and then replicate/rehome
the public folders.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of
the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with
allowing OOFs to the Internet. How does this work to avoid mail loops?
...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works
Get rid of that firewall. It just adds another useless level of complexity.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Ronny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Open Ports !
Hi !
I have an Exchange Server behind a
Try /cleanreminders switch.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q197180
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: David Barnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 6:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Problem with Recurring Appointments in
I don't mind autoreply. I dislike OOF though.
-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OOF replies to the Internet
Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some
OOF's only fire one per sender - internally or externally. It's the
allowing automatic replies to the Internet that causes the mail loops as
these do not discriminate.
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 March 2002 20:11
To:
Now wouldn't you feel bad if he does just that.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Open Ports !
Get rid of that firewall. It
Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause mail loops...
Allowing OOFS to the internet:
Tom Meunier
I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address. Please
put me on your A list for resale to other spammers.
I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy.
Imp filing this one away for another day!
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet
Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause mail
Actually since we didn't have a 3rd party tool, we simply bumped up the
diagnostics on the IMCs and archived all traffic. Then ran scripts etc to
analyze the pile of messages captured.
Since you have Promodag and it does analyze tracking logs, your job will be
a lot easier than what we did.
Hi Guys,
On one of my exchange servers which happen to be running Internet mail
service there is a folder \exchsrvr\imcdata\log and has very large log (up
to a gig large) files.
Any ideas about what it is and is there a way to shrink these log files?
Thanks
Davinder
There was a time I was a caring individual with a sense of conscience. Then
I met a mulcher-lover (he knows who he is) who taught me how much fun it is
to be evil and mean to people.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March
They are SMTP protocol logs. You can't shrink them, but can stop new ones
from being created by toning down your diagnostic logging settings in your
IMS. If you don't even know what they are, chances are you'll never look at
them. Therefore, they can probably be safely moved off to another
a. Your spell-chunker changed onus to bonus.
b. Ed C. said much of the same stuff before I did. I'm handsomer,
though. Well, taller.
c. Good to see you're still with us.
-tom
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 02:25
large log...
-Original Message-
From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMS logs
Hi Guys,
On one of my exchange servers which happen to be running Internet mail
service there is a folder
Actually she changed it from Owner to Boner.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet
a. Your spell-chunker changed onus to bonus.
b. Ed C. said much of the
I'm lurking. Same questions different year. My spellchecker didn't change
it, I did. I was actually being cordial.
Ed is more my type. He's got the geek look goin' on. Yum.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:45 PM
To:
He floats like a butterfly and stings when he pees.
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet
I'm lurking. Same questions different year. My spellchecker
I believe hotmail does reverse-dns lookups. Don't know about mediaone[1].
The UNIX guys don't have to modify their boxes, they simply need to put a
valid From: address[2], that's all.
Serdar Soysal
[1] Since MediaOne was bought out by ComCast, it is really a very bad test
platform. ANYTHING
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
