Exchange Address List/Active Directory query
I have a problem where there is a user in the exchange address list, but I cannot find this user in Active Directory Users Computers. In Exchange System Manager, I have previewed the All Users list and the user shows up. I have copied this ldap query into a Custom find ADSI Edit and the user is not displayed in either. What could cause this? I'm at a loss to where this info is stored. I am trying to delete this user from the email lists because it is wrong and it is stopping the creation of another because the email address is already in use. Environment: 15 Exchange 5.5 (SP4), 2 Exchange 2000 domains (SP2). Servers are NT4/SP5, Windows 2000/SP2. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ESM Status bar
You're not missing anything. Try this: In ADUC, right-click your domain name at the top and choose Find. In the Find combo box, choose Exchange Recipients. On the General tab you can select which type of object to search for. On the Storage tab, choose the relevant option, e.g. mailboxes on a particular server etc, then click the Find button. Not as quick as in 5.5 days, but you get used to it. Neil -Original Message- From: Danny Mills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 24 June 2002 02:01 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: ESM Status bar Subject: ESM Status bar Using 5.5 Admin you could see the number of objects in each Container. This was very handy. Using ESM on 2000 with the Status Bar and other options turned on I cannot see the number of objects displayed anywhere. The Three column Status Bar at the bottom of the window is empty. Is this by design? or am I missing something? Thanks Danny Mills _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drive M missing
Thanks for the response but this is not it. I am aware of that error. The red error is cleared when I restart the services. Until I click on the public folder web folder I do not see an error. It shows the path as drive M:\domainname\public folders but as I can't see a drive M on the computer I decided to click on it to see what happend. I get could not enumerate the ... path not found. But when I right click and browse I get through? Leo Leo, When you see a virtual directory in iis manager in red and says path not found all that means is that iis initialised that directory before all exchange services were initialed completely. If you stop your www services and restart them that directory should no longer be in red and wont get the path not found or cannot enumarate errors in iis. Hope this helps... -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 5:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive M missing Folks, all the services start and yes there is an M: drive (EXIFS provides it). All the stores mount and everything appears to be ok. Actually I have not had chance to stop and restart the EXIFS service (that may do it). But somehow when you see the website defined in Internet services manager and you click on it and it says it can't find the path you start to gather that something is wrong. All the other servers do not exhibit this problem and I would appreciate some options (whilst joking is a great way to communicate it may not be the way to solve this but hey whadda I know?) Leo Drive M appears when the exchange system attendant service starts, In=20 services start Exchange System Attendant service. =20 Bashir Malekzada AOptix Technologies , Inc. (408) 583 1130 [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=3D20 Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 7:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Drive M missing =20 Are the stores mounting? =20 Is OWA working? =20 if yes, forget about drive M: =20 =20 Actually *what do you mean drive M:? there is no such thing*. It is a=20 figment of your imagination. =20 -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Drive M missing =20 =20 We had to delete first storage group on one of our exchange servers=20 and when we created a new storage group and added a public and private information store all seemed well. =20 Unfortunately there appears to be no drive M? =20 Also in Internet Services manager the exchange subwebs appear and have paths to drive m. =20 When I click on them they report location can not be found but when I=20 do =3D a right click browse they open up fine? =20 We are running exchange 2000 enterprise with Sp2. =20 =20 Any ideas how to get the drive M back? =20 =20 Regards Leo =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freebusy with Exchange 2000
Dear User Group Here is another problem for you. Exchange 2000 SP2 NT 2000 SP2 Scenario: Create a mailbox server with two separate mailbox databases in the same storage group (deleted the public folder database that gets installed by default). Create a separate dedicated Public folder server and point the users to use the dedicated public folder server. Test and Result: When I tested the free/busy between the two databases on the mailbox server it did not work. I had to re-create a public folder database on the mailbox server in order to get the free/busy working. From this I am assuming that each server must have a public folder database for the free/busy to work. Would I be correct to assume that it needs the special folder for free/busy to work? Questions: Can any one point me to any good information on free/busy for Exchange 2000 and how it all works (TechNet preferably)? Would I be correct to say that every Exchange 2000 server must have a public folder database on each mailbox server to get the free/busy to work? Some of you might be asking what's the big deal in having a public folder database server on a mailbox server doing very little. I am trying to improve performance and administration overhead? Constructive comments would be much appreciated. Regards Marc Mearns Mobile - 07775-630508 Office - 020 7695 0286 ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Freebusy with Exchange 2000
Free/Busy is a special, hidden public folder. I think you'd need to rehome it to your dedicated server prior to deleting the public folder store on the mailbox server. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marc Mearns Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Freebusy with Exchange 2000 Dear User Group Here is another problem for you. Exchange 2000 SP2 NT 2000 SP2 Scenario: Create a mailbox server with two separate mailbox databases in the same storage group (deleted the public folder database that gets installed by default). Create a separate dedicated Public folder server and point the users to use the dedicated public folder server. Test and Result: When I tested the free/busy between the two databases on the mailbox server it did not work. I had to re-create a public folder database on the mailbox server in order to get the free/busy working. From this I am assuming that each server must have a public folder database for the free/busy to work. Would I be correct to assume that it needs the special folder for free/busy to work? Questions: Can any one point me to any good information on free/busy for Exchange 2000 and how it all works (TechNet preferably)? Would I be correct to say that every Exchange 2000 server must have a public folder database on each mailbox server to get the free/busy to work? Some of you might be asking what's the big deal in having a public folder database server on a mailbox server doing very little. I am trying to improve performance and administration overhead? Constructive comments would be much appreciated. Regards Marc Mearns Mobile - 07775-630508 Office - 020 7695 0286 ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drive M missing
Leo, What error messages do you see in the event log ? -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 June 2002 11:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive M missing Thanks for the response but this is not it. I am aware of that error. The red error is cleared when I restart the services. Until I click on the public folder web folder I do not see an error. It shows the path as drive M:\domainname\public folders but as I can't see a drive M on the computer I decided to click on it to see what happend. I get could not enumerate the ... path not found. But when I right click and browse I get through? Leo Leo, When you see a virtual directory in iis manager in red and says path not found all that means is that iis initialised that directory before all exchange services were initialed completely. If you stop your www services and restart them that directory should no longer be in red and wont get the path not found or cannot enumarate errors in iis. Hope this helps... -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 5:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive M missing Folks, all the services start and yes there is an M: drive (EXIFS provides it). All the stores mount and everything appears to be ok. Actually I have not had chance to stop and restart the EXIFS service (that may do it). But somehow when you see the website defined in Internet services manager and you click on it and it says it can't find the path you start to gather that something is wrong. All the other servers do not exhibit this problem and I would appreciate some options (whilst joking is a great way to communicate it may not be the way to solve this but hey whadda I know?) Leo Drive M appears when the exchange system attendant service starts, In=20 services start Exchange System Attendant service. =20 Bashir Malekzada AOptix Technologies , Inc. (408) 583 1130 [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=3D20 Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 7:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Drive M missing =20 Are the stores mounting? =20 Is OWA working? =20 if yes, forget about drive M: =20 =20 Actually *what do you mean drive M:? there is no such thing*. It is a=20 figment of your imagination. =20 -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Drive M missing =20 =20 We had to delete first storage group on one of our exchange servers=20 and when we created a new storage group and added a public and private information store all seemed well. =20 Unfortunately there appears to be no drive M? =20 Also in Internet Services manager the exchange subwebs appear and have paths to drive m. =20 When I click on them they report location can not be found but when I=20 do =3D a right click browse they open up fine? =20 We are running exchange 2000 enterprise with Sp2. =20 =20 Any ideas how to get the drive M back? =20 =20 Regards Leo =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to block UCE at MSX55-IMC level
There's the new product from Cloudmark http://www.cloudmark.com/ Loosely fits those requirements... Not sure if it's ideal for your environment. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to block UCE at MSX55-IMC level I was thinking the same thing about the reqs. They are all actually nice features, but I don't see them anywhere as of now. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to block UCE at MSX55-IMC level A very specific set of requirements that I'm not aware any products currently meet. What's your budget? I'll whip one up for the right price. -Original Message- From: Microsoft Exchange List Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How to block UCE at MSX55-IMC level Hi All, MSX 5.5+SP4 We are looking for a product that helps out to stop UCE, this product should allow the users to send (via email) a particular UCE received to the product-database for this database to block future incoming messages with same sender/subject, also the users should receive a report of all messages blocked in a weekly basis. Hope you can share your experiences with the list. tia -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Installing GroupShield Exchange 4.5
I am preparing to install Group Shield Exchange 4.5 to my Exchange 5.5 w/ SP4. Anybody with any feedback, input warning, sugestion would be greatly appriciated. Untung Tanamal _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange properties missing
Probably an easy question... Installed E2k on Win2000 Adv. on a member server of a native AD domain. Joined the server to an existing 5.5 site, ADC is installed on the E2k box. If I go to the U C console on any of my domain controllers, the Exchange tabs (account properties) are missing from view. If I use the console that was installed on the E2K server, the tabs show up and I can edit all properties of the mailbox. Is this by design? What do I need to do to get the same functionality for any console I create/use? Did I screw up by not putting the ADC on a DC? Thanks- Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange Calendar Problem
I'm very unfamiliar with Exchange. Currently only people in AD|Domain.com|Users| PrivateGroup have access to the corp. calendar. I need peolpe in AD|Domain.com|Users| AllEmplotees to have it. How do I do that? TIA reed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
STORE.EXE - How much is too much?
I am now confused on the operation of e2k sp2 store.exe process, as a result of reading this fine list :-) Let's just say for example that one had a single exchange server in their network. Let's also say that box has a fast processor (only one), with 1Gig of ram and also runs the 2nd DC and hosts a GC. Nothing else running on the server, especially anything from any AV vendor. Would the following store.exe sizes be reasonable? At what point should I be worried about the process failing? 600M - day before yesterday 650M - yesterday 471M - a few minutes ago I gathered, from the docs, that the process is supposed to use all available memory, minus whatever it grudgingly allowed the OS to give away to other processes. Thanks for any thoughts you may relate, Gary Barnett Network Administrator Wells St. John P.S. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange properties missing
This is by design. Either install the E2k System Manager on the DCs, or use Terminal Services to administer the E2k server remotely. Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 21 June 2002 23:59 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Exchange properties missing Subject: Exchange properties missing Probably an easy question... Installed E2k on Win2000 Adv. on a member server of a native AD domain. Joined the server to an existing 5.5 site, ADC is installed on the E2k box. If I go to the U C console on any of my domain controllers, the Exchange tabs (account properties) are missing from view. If I use the console that was installed on the E2K server, the tabs show up and I can edit all properties of the mailbox. Is this by design? What do I need to do to get the same functionality for any console I create/use? Did I screw up by not putting the ADC on a DC? Thanks- Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange properties missing
You need to install the ESM in order to see the Exchange Property tabs in your UG. Geoff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 6:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange properties missing Probably an easy question... Installed E2k on Win2000 Adv. on a member server of a native AD domain. Joined the server to an existing 5.5 site, ADC is installed on the E2k box. If I go to the U C console on any of my domain controllers, the Exchange tabs (account properties) are missing from view. If I use the console that was installed on the E2K server, the tabs show up and I can edit all properties of the mailbox. Is this by design? What do I need to do to get the same functionality for any console I create/use? Did I screw up by not putting the ADC on a DC? Thanks- Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE - How much is too much?
That's exactly it; store.exe uses memory until another process requests some. The bottom line is that if you have 1G RAM and only use 20%, the remaining 80% is doing naff all, and you might as well pull a bank of RAM out of the server. Neil -Original Message- From: Gary Barnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 22 June 2002 01:26 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: STORE.EXE - How much is too much? Subject: STORE.EXE - How much is too much? I am now confused on the operation of e2k sp2 store.exe process, as a result of reading this fine list :-) Let's just say for example that one had a single exchange server in their network. Let's also say that box has a fast processor (only one), with 1Gig of ram and also runs the 2nd DC and hosts a GC. Nothing else running on the server, especially anything from any AV vendor. Would the following store.exe sizes be reasonable? At what point should I be worried about the process failing? 600M - day before yesterday 650M - yesterday 471M - a few minutes ago I gathered, from the docs, that the process is supposed to use all available memory, minus whatever it grudgingly allowed the OS to give away to other processes. Thanks for any thoughts you may relate, Gary Barnett Network Administrator Wells St. John P.S. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Calendar Problem
Set access permissions on the calendar (either from the Outlook client or Exchange System Manager) so that your AllEmployees group has at least Reviewer rights to the DEFAULT role on the calendar permissions. Neil -Original Message- From: Reed O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 21 June 2002 18:11 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Exchange Calendar Problem Subject: Exchange Calendar Problem I'm very unfamiliar with Exchange. Currently only people in AD|Domain.com|Users| PrivateGroup have access to the corp. calendar. I need peolpe in AD|Domain.com|Users| AllEmplotees to have it. How do I do that? TIA reed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE - How much is too much?
-Original Message- From: Gary Barnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 June 2002 01:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE - How much is too much? I am now confused on the operation of e2k sp2 store.exe process, as a result of reading this fine list :-) Let's just say for example that one had a single exchange server in their network. Let's also say that box has a fast processor (only one), with 1Gig of ram and also runs the 2nd DC and hosts a GC. Nothing else running on the server, especially anything from any AV vendor. Would the following store.exe sizes be reasonable? At what point should I be worried about the process failing? 600M - day before yesterday 650M - yesterday 471M - a few minutes ago I gathered, from the docs, that the process is supposed to use all available memory, minus whatever it grudgingly allowed the OS to give away to other processes. Thanks for any thoughts you may relate, Theres nothing there that indicates the process failing. It will use more space as it needs it, up to its top limit, and will release space on request, and then will grab it back as it needs it again. So fluctuations are not unusual. If it was going up and down like a lunatic all the time that might be a bit interesting but steady changes upwards with dips back down here and there are not unusual. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP Senior IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rules for sysadmins # 705: If I am in any doubt as to how a wildcard will expand I will echo it first. -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing GroupShield Exchange 4.5
Groupshield 4.5 has been superseded by Groupshield 5. If you must use McAfee software, I'd skip GS 4.5 altogether and go straight to GS 5.0. You can get it from here http://www.mcafeeb2b.com/naicommon/download/upgrade/login.asp (requires your NAI support grant number). Otherwise you'll need GS 4.5SP1 plus Hotfix 7 (a nightmare to install). Then increase OpenRetryDelay to 0x800 or more (google will find you the Knowledgebase article). Then pray :-) Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Untung Tanamal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 June 2002 21:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing GroupShield Exchange 4.5 I am preparing to install Group Shield Exchange 4.5 to my Exchange 5.5 w/ SP4. Anybody with any feedback, input warning, sugestion would be greatly appriciated. Untung Tanamal _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ESM Status bar
Handy E2K -Original Message- From: Danny Mills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 8:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ESM Status bar Using 5.5 Admin you could see the number of objects in each Container. This was very handy. Using ESM on 2000 with the Status Bar and other options turned on I cannot see the number of objects displayed anywhere. The Three column Status Bar at the bottom of the window is empty. Is this by design? or am I missing something? Thanks Danny Mills _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange properties missing
Thanks for the help. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange properties missing You need to install the ESM in order to see the Exchange Property tabs in your UG. Geoff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 6:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange properties missing Probably an easy question... Installed E2k on Win2000 Adv. on a member server of a native AD domain. Joined the server to an existing 5.5 site, ADC is installed on the E2k box. If I go to the U C console on any of my domain controllers, the Exchange tabs (account properties) are missing from view. If I use the console that was installed on the E2K server, the tabs show up and I can edit all properties of the mailbox. Is this by design? What do I need to do to get the same functionality for any console I create/use? Did I screw up by not putting the ADC on a DC? Thanks- Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing GroupShield Exchange 4.5
OK...make sure you have the support contract from NAI..for tech support. I would think the GS 5.0 product would be better to use they fixed quite a few bug's. But if you continue to go with 4.5, make sure you have Hotfix7...which I believe is in the SP1 for 4.5. Read the Readmereally..do it there s a weird thing about long directory names when installing 4.5. make sure the scan engine register correctly and that the DAT-virus def's reg to the GS4.5 correctly otheriwse it could go on a stripping attachment frenzy..it happend too me...was very badand NO way to get the attachments back in without a restore... or handing them out manaually when someone ask's for them I found GS4.5 a pain...it id not repsonde them same in the production server as it did on my test server..the install was horridNAI tech was well somewhat helpful but it took like 6 call's to get 4.5 working correctly and to install correctly..it took like two install's too go with the 5.0 if you are in the NAI licensing thing'y it is a better product then 4.5. Also with 4.5 you will need to load the Name Resolve...it's sepetrate program... and run it seperately//this is all in 5.0 now bill -Original Message- From: Untung Tanamal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 4:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing GroupShield Exchange 4.5 I am preparing to install Group Shield Exchange 4.5 to my Exchange 5.5 w/ SP4. Anybody with any feedback, input warning, sugestion would be greatly appriciated. Untung Tanamal _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing GroupShield Exchange 4.5
I would echo what Bill and Phil said about skipping 4.5 and going with GSE 5.0. Also, if you are an NAI/McAfee shop and using ePO be careful to configure ePO for GSE 5 as well. I made that mistake and was just about to call tech support because none of the settings that I would make in Groupshield would stick. It turned out that I had neglected to configure the settings in ePO and every time that Groupshield would talk to the ePO server it would overwrite the settings that I had made with the settings in ePO, meaning NO SETTINGS. Once I saw figured that out it has run smoothly ever since. Much better than previous efforts. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Untung Tanamal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 7:04 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: Installing GroupShield Exchange 4.5 I am preparing to install Group Shield Exchange 4.5 to my Exchange 5.5 w/ SP4. Anybody with any feedback, input warning, sugestion would be greatly appriciated. Untung Tanamal _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Address List/Active Directory query
Be sure the recipient update service is running. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Duane Purcell Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 11:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Address List/Active Directory query I have a problem where there is a user in the exchange address list, but I cannot find this user in Active Directory Users Computers. In Exchange System Manager, I have previewed the All Users list and the user shows up. I have copied this ldap query into a Custom find ADSI Edit and the user is not displayed in either. What could cause this? I'm at a loss to where this info is stored. I am trying to delete this user from the email lists because it is wrong and it is stopping the creation of another because the email address is already in use. Environment: 15 Exchange 5.5 (SP4), 2 Exchange 2000 domains (SP2). Servers are NT4/SP5, Windows 2000/SP2. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Freebusy with Exchange 2000
You should, yes. But if you don't, you can fix the problem. There are a couple of KB articles on this subject. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Freebusy with Exchange 2000 Free/Busy is a special, hidden public folder. I think you'd need to rehome it to your dedicated server prior to deleting the public folder store on the mailbox server. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marc Mearns Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Freebusy with Exchange 2000 Dear User Group Here is another problem for you. Exchange 2000 SP2 NT 2000 SP2 Scenario: Create a mailbox server with two separate mailbox databases in the same storage group (deleted the public folder database that gets installed by default). Create a separate dedicated Public folder server and point the users to use the dedicated public folder server. Test and Result: When I tested the free/busy between the two databases on the mailbox server it did not work. I had to re-create a public folder database on the mailbox server in order to get the free/busy working. From this I am assuming that each server must have a public folder database for the free/busy to work. Would I be correct to assume that it needs the special folder for free/busy to work? Questions: Can any one point me to any good information on free/busy for Exchange 2000 and how it all works (TechNet preferably)? Would I be correct to say that every Exchange 2000 server must have a public folder database on each mailbox server to get the free/busy to work? Some of you might be asking what's the big deal in having a public folder database server on a mailbox server doing very little. I am trying to improve performance and administration overhead? Constructive comments would be much appreciated. Regards Marc Mearns Mobile - 07775-630508 Office - 020 7695 0286 ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE - How much is too much?
Given the chance, Exchange will use the lesser of what it needs and what is available, conceding memory to other processes that need it. Not necessarily all available. In your case, it likely ceded memory to DC processes. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Barnett Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE - How much is too much? I am now confused on the operation of e2k sp2 store.exe process, as a result of reading this fine list :-) Let's just say for example that one had a single exchange server in their network. Let's also say that box has a fast processor (only one), with 1Gig of ram and also runs the 2nd DC and hosts a GC. Nothing else running on the server, especially anything from any AV vendor. Would the following store.exe sizes be reasonable? At what point should I be worried about the process failing? 600M - day before yesterday 650M - yesterday 471M - a few minutes ago I gathered, from the docs, that the process is supposed to use all available memory, minus whatever it grudgingly allowed the OS to give away to other processes. Thanks for any thoughts you may relate, Gary Barnett Network Administrator Wells St. John P.S. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Calendar Problem
Default's not a role; it's sort of a local group and specifies the permissions applied to everyone not otherwise granted permissions. You would want to add the AllEmployees group to the permissions list for the folder and assign it the Reviewer role. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 7:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Calendar Problem Set access permissions on the calendar (either from the Outlook client or Exchange System Manager) so that your AllEmployees group has at least Reviewer rights to the DEFAULT role on the calendar permissions. Neil -Original Message- From: Reed O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 21 June 2002 18:11 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Exchange Calendar Problem Subject: Exchange Calendar Problem I'm very unfamiliar with Exchange. Currently only people in AD|Domain.com|Users| PrivateGroup have access to the corp. calendar. I need peolpe in AD|Domain.com|Users| AllEmplotees to have it. How do I do that? TIA reed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE - How much is too much?
I' keep getting the message Failed to connect to the Microsoft Exchange Server when trying to access Exchange using OWA. I've tried the Microsoft article Q178511 to correct the problem but it still doesn't work. Has anyone encountered this problem before or have any suggestions. Thanks Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Calendar Problem
Indeed. I've just re-read my post, and I've no idea where I got that from! Neil -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 24 June 2002 16:38 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Exchange Calendar Problem Subject: RE: Exchange Calendar Problem Default's not a role; it's sort of a local group and specifies the permissions applied to everyone not otherwise granted permissions. You would want to add the AllEmployees group to the permissions list for the folder and assign it the Reviewer role. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 7:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Calendar Problem Set access permissions on the calendar (either from the Outlook client or Exchange System Manager) so that your AllEmployees group has at least Reviewer rights to the DEFAULT role on the calendar permissions. Neil -Original Message- From: Reed O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 21 June 2002 18:11 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Exchange Calendar Problem Subject: Exchange Calendar Problem I'm very unfamiliar with Exchange. Currently only people in AD|Domain.com|Users| PrivateGroup have access to the corp. calendar. I need peolpe in AD|Domain.com|Users| AllEmplotees to have it. How do I do that? TIA reed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE - How much is too much?
Do you think it's because store.exe is using too much memory? Or are you starting a new thread? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mario Fernandez Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE - How much is too much? I' keep getting the message Failed to connect to the Microsoft Exchange Server when trying to access Exchange using OWA. I've tried the Microsoft article Q178511 to correct the problem but it still doesn't work. Has anyone encountered this problem before or have any suggestions. Thanks Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE - How much is too much?
Check the OWA Troubleshooter: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=%2Fsupport%2Fexchange%2Fc ontent%2Fwhitepapers%2Fowa%5Ftshoot%2Easp William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mario Fernandez Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE - How much is too much? I' keep getting the message Failed to connect to the Microsoft Exchange Server when trying to access Exchange using OWA. I've tried the Microsoft article Q178511 to correct the problem but it still doesn't work. Has anyone encountered this problem before or have any suggestions. Thanks Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA - Failed to connect...
I' keep getting the message Failed to connect to the Microsoft Exchange Server when trying to access Exchange using OWA. I've tried the Microsoft article Q178511 to correct the problem but it still doesn't work. Has anyone encountered this problem before or have any suggestions. Thanks Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE - How much is too much?
You didn't buy all that RAM to have it sit unused, now did you? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Barnett Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE - How much is too much? I am now confused on the operation of e2k sp2 store.exe process, as a result of reading this fine list :-) Let's just say for example that one had a single exchange server in their network. Let's also say that box has a fast processor (only one), with 1Gig of ram and also runs the 2nd DC and hosts a GC. Nothing else running on the server, especially anything from any AV vendor. Would the following store.exe sizes be reasonable? At what point should I be worried about the process failing? 600M - day before yesterday 650M - yesterday 471M - a few minutes ago I gathered, from the docs, that the process is supposed to use all available memory, minus whatever it grudgingly allowed the OS to give away to other processes. Thanks for any thoughts you may relate, Gary Barnett Network Administrator Wells St. John P.S. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA - Failed to connect...
Exchange 5.5, right? There's an OWA troubleshooter white paper you might want to follow. http://support.microsoft.com/support/exchange/content/whitepapers/owa_ts hoot.asp (Link may wrap.) Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mario Fernandez Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA - Failed to connect... I' keep getting the message Failed to connect to the Microsoft Exchange Server when trying to access Exchange using OWA. I've tried the Microsoft article Q178511 to correct the problem but it still doesn't work. Has anyone encountered this problem before or have any suggestions. Thanks Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMS routing question:
Currently, we’re running Exchange 5.5 SP4 with hotfixes on an NT4.0 SP6A servers. We have 2 mailbox servers with one IMS/Bridgehead server. One of the mailbox servers also has an IMC with a cost of 99 as a “just in case” scenario. Currently, our Internet mail comes through the UNIX firewall which performs a relay function using post.office. The firewall is going to be changed and will not perform this relay function any longer. Currently, our ISP performs queuing for us for up to 4 days worth of mail should our site be unavailable. My question is this: Since we will not longer have this relaying function from the UNIX firewalls, the mail will go directly via port 25 to the Exchange IMS/bridgehead server. The UNIX administrator insists that it is a good idea to put a UNIX Sendmail server in between the firewall and the Exchange server for queuing purposes, however, I don’t see the need for it. Can someone please explain to me if this UNIX server is necessary? To me it seems like an extra hop for no reason. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS routing question:
A relay server of some kind /can/ be a good idea for security reasons... but there's no reason that relay server couldn't be an IIS SMTP server instead of a Sendmail server (i.e. there's nothing magic about Sendmail). If your IMS server is a dedicated box (no mailboxes) the need for a relay server is somewhat diminished in my mind. -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMS routing question: Currently, we're running Exchange 5.5 SP4 with hotfixes on an NT4.0 SP6A servers. We have 2 mailbox servers with one IMS/Bridgehead server. One of the mailbox servers also has an IMC with a cost of 99 as a just in case scenario. Currently, our Internet mail comes through the UNIX firewall which performs a relay function using post.office. The firewall is going to be changed and will not perform this relay function any longer. Currently, our ISP performs queuing for us for up to 4 days worth of mail should our site be unavailable. My question is this: Since we will not longer have this relaying function from the UNIX firewalls, the mail will go directly via port 25 to the Exchange IMS/bridgehead server. The UNIX administrator insists that it is a good idea to put a UNIX Sendmail server in between the firewall and the Exchange server for queuing purposes, however, I don't see the need for it. Can someone please explain to me if this UNIX server is necessary? To me it seems like an extra hop for no reason. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS routing question:
Unless you would like to offload such things as gateway antivirus protection and content screening. Those are good applications to put on relay servers like you are talking about. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS routing question: A relay server of some kind /can/ be a good idea for security reasons... but there's no reason that relay server couldn't be an IIS SMTP server instead of a Sendmail server (i.e. there's nothing magic about Sendmail). If your IMS server is a dedicated box (no mailboxes) the need for a relay server is somewhat diminished in my mind. -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMS routing question: Currently, we're running Exchange 5.5 SP4 with hotfixes on an NT4.0 SP6A servers. We have 2 mailbox servers with one IMS/Bridgehead server. One of the mailbox servers also has an IMC with a cost of 99 as a just in case scenario. Currently, our Internet mail comes through the UNIX firewall which performs a relay function using post.office. The firewall is going to be changed and will not perform this relay function any longer. Currently, our ISP performs queuing for us for up to 4 days worth of mail should our site be unavailable. My question is this: Since we will not longer have this relaying function from the UNIX firewalls, the mail will go directly via port 25 to the Exchange IMS/bridgehead server. The UNIX administrator insists that it is a good idea to put a UNIX Sendmail server in between the firewall and the Exchange server for queuing purposes, however, I don't see the need for it. Can someone please explain to me if this UNIX server is necessary? To me it seems like an extra hop for no reason. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Freebusy with Exchange 2000
Ed Can you please tell me what the Q articles are? Regards -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 June 2002 16:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Freebusy with Exchange 2000 You should, yes. But if you don't, you can fix the problem. There are a couple of KB articles on this subject. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Freebusy with Exchange 2000 Free/Busy is a special, hidden public folder. I think you'd need to rehome it to your dedicated server prior to deleting the public folder store on the mailbox server. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marc Mearns Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Freebusy with Exchange 2000 Dear User Group Here is another problem for you. Exchange 2000 SP2 NT 2000 SP2 Scenario: Create a mailbox server with two separate mailbox databases in the same storage group (deleted the public folder database that gets installed by default). Create a separate dedicated Public folder server and point the users to use the dedicated public folder server. Test and Result: When I tested the free/busy between the two databases on the mailbox server it did not work. I had to re-create a public folder database on the mailbox server in order to get the free/busy working. From this I am assuming that each server must have a public folder database for the free/busy to work. Would I be correct to assume that it needs the special folder for free/busy to work? Questions: Can any one point me to any good information on free/busy for Exchange 2000 and how it all works (TechNet preferably)? Would I be correct to say that every Exchange 2000 server must have a public folder database on each mailbox server to get the free/busy to work? Some of you might be asking what's the big deal in having a public folder database server on a mailbox server doing very little. I am trying to improve performance and administration overhead? Constructive comments would be much appreciated. Regards Marc Mearns Mobile - 07775-630508 Office - 020 7695 0286 ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT **
RE: Freebusy with Exchange 2000
William Cheers, I will go and play again. Regards -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 June 2002 10:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Freebusy with Exchange 2000 Free/Busy is a special, hidden public folder. I think you'd need to rehome it to your dedicated server prior to deleting the public folder store on the mailbox server. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marc Mearns Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Freebusy with Exchange 2000 Dear User Group Here is another problem for you. Exchange 2000 SP2 NT 2000 SP2 Scenario: Create a mailbox server with two separate mailbox databases in the same storage group (deleted the public folder database that gets installed by default). Create a separate dedicated Public folder server and point the users to use the dedicated public folder server. Test and Result: When I tested the free/busy between the two databases on the mailbox server it did not work. I had to re-create a public folder database on the mailbox server in order to get the free/busy working. From this I am assuming that each server must have a public folder database for the free/busy to work. Would I be correct to assume that it needs the special folder for free/busy to work? Questions: Can any one point me to any good information on free/busy for Exchange 2000 and how it all works (TechNet preferably)? Would I be correct to say that every Exchange 2000 server must have a public folder database on each mailbox server to get the free/busy to work? Some of you might be asking what's the big deal in having a public folder database server on a mailbox server doing very little. I am trying to improve performance and administration overhead? Constructive comments would be much appreciated. Regards Marc Mearns Mobile - 07775-630508 Office - 020 7695 0286 ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Freebusy with Exchange 2000
How to rehome puclic folders: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q288150 Also: XADM: How to Reset System Folders on an Exchange 2000 Server (Q275171) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q275171 XADM: Schedule+ Free/Busy System Folder Is Missing (Q284200) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q284200 William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marc Mearns Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Freebusy with Exchange 2000 William Cheers, I will go and play again. Regards -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 June 2002 10:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Freebusy with Exchange 2000 Free/Busy is a special, hidden public folder. I think you'd need to rehome it to your dedicated server prior to deleting the public folder store on the mailbox server. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marc Mearns Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Freebusy with Exchange 2000 Dear User Group Here is another problem for you. Exchange 2000 SP2 NT 2000 SP2 Scenario: Create a mailbox server with two separate mailbox databases in the same storage group (deleted the public folder database that gets installed by default). Create a separate dedicated Public folder server and point the users to use the dedicated public folder server. Test and Result: When I tested the free/busy between the two databases on the mailbox server it did not work. I had to re-create a public folder database on the mailbox server in order to get the free/busy working. From this I am assuming that each server must have a public folder database for the free/busy to work. Would I be correct to assume that it needs the special folder for free/busy to work? Questions: Can any one point me to any good information on free/busy for Exchange 2000 and how it all works (TechNet preferably)? Would I be correct to say that every Exchange 2000 server must have a public folder database on each mailbox server to get the free/busy to work? Some of you might be asking what's the big deal in having a public folder database server on a mailbox server doing very little. I am trying to improve performance and administration overhead? Constructive comments would be much appreciated. Regards Marc Mearns Mobile - 07775-630508 Office - 020 7695 0286 ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Freebusy with Exchange 2000
William Thanks for your help. I will look at the Q articles. Can I just confirm with you. Are we saying that we do not need a Public folder for each mailbox server for 2000 and if I replicate the system folder to another public folder the free/busy will still work for the users on the mailbox server that I have deleted the public folder database? Thanks again. Regards -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 June 2002 17:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Freebusy with Exchange 2000 How to rehome puclic folders: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q288150 Also: XADM: How to Reset System Folders on an Exchange 2000 Server (Q275171) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q275171 XADM: Schedule+ Free/Busy System Folder Is Missing (Q284200) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q284200 William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marc Mearns Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Freebusy with Exchange 2000 William Cheers, I will go and play again. Regards -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 June 2002 10:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Freebusy with Exchange 2000 Free/Busy is a special, hidden public folder. I think you'd need to rehome it to your dedicated server prior to deleting the public folder store on the mailbox server. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marc Mearns Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Freebusy with Exchange 2000 Dear User Group Here is another problem for you. Exchange 2000 SP2 NT 2000 SP2 Scenario: Create a mailbox server with two separate mailbox databases in the same storage group (deleted the public folder database that gets installed by default). Create a separate dedicated Public folder server and point the users to use the dedicated public folder server. Test and Result: When I tested the free/busy between the two databases on the mailbox server it did not work. I had to re-create a public folder database on the mailbox server in order to get the free/busy working. From this I am assuming that each server must have a public folder database for the free/busy to work. Would I be correct to assume that it needs the special folder for free/busy to work? Questions: Can any one point me to any good information on free/busy for Exchange 2000 and how it all works (TechNet preferably)? Would I be correct to say that every Exchange 2000 server must have a public folder database on each mailbox server to get the free/busy to work? Some of you might be asking what's the big deal in having a public folder database server on a mailbox server doing very little. I am trying to improve performance and administration overhead? Constructive comments would be much appreciated. Regards Marc Mearns Mobile - 07775-630508 Office - 020 7695 0286 ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ).
RE: Freebusy with Exchange 2000
Yes, that is correct. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marc Mearns Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Freebusy with Exchange 2000 William Thanks for your help. I will look at the Q articles. Can I just confirm with you. Are we saying that we do not need a Public folder for each mailbox server for 2000 and if I replicate the system folder to another public folder the free/busy will still work for the users on the mailbox server that I have deleted the public folder database? Thanks again. Regards -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 June 2002 17:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Freebusy with Exchange 2000 How to rehome puclic folders: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q288150 Also: XADM: How to Reset System Folders on an Exchange 2000 Server (Q275171) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q275171 XADM: Schedule+ Free/Busy System Folder Is Missing (Q284200) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q284200 William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marc Mearns Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Freebusy with Exchange 2000 William Cheers, I will go and play again. Regards -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 June 2002 10:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Freebusy with Exchange 2000 Free/Busy is a special, hidden public folder. I think you'd need to rehome it to your dedicated server prior to deleting the public folder store on the mailbox server. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marc Mearns Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Freebusy with Exchange 2000 Dear User Group Here is another problem for you. Exchange 2000 SP2 NT 2000 SP2 Scenario: Create a mailbox server with two separate mailbox databases in the same storage group (deleted the public folder database that gets installed by default). Create a separate dedicated Public folder server and point the users to use the dedicated public folder server. Test and Result: When I tested the free/busy between the two databases on the mailbox server it did not work. I had to re-create a public folder database on the mailbox server in order to get the free/busy working. From this I am assuming that each server must have a public folder database for the free/busy to work. Would I be correct to assume that it needs the special folder for free/busy to work? Questions: Can any one point me to any good information on free/busy for Exchange 2000 and how it all works (TechNet preferably)? Would I be correct to say that every Exchange 2000 server must have a public folder database on each mailbox server to get the free/busy to work? Some of you might be asking what's the big deal in having a public folder database server on a mailbox server doing very little. I am trying to improve performance and administration overhead? Constructive comments would be much appreciated. Regards Marc Mearns Mobile - 07775-630508 Office - 020 7695 0286 ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This email and any files
Re: STORE.EXE - How much is too much?
I wonder if you can use Compact Flash cards to run the Store.exe on .. I have a few left over. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 5:50 PM Subject: RE: STORE.EXE - How much is too much? You didn't buy all that RAM to have it sit unused, now did you? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Barnett Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE - How much is too much? I am now confused on the operation of e2k sp2 store.exe process, as a result of reading this fine list :-) Let's just say for example that one had a single exchange server in their network. Let's also say that box has a fast processor (only one), with 1Gig of ram and also runs the 2nd DC and hosts a GC. Nothing else running on the server, especially anything from any AV vendor. Would the following store.exe sizes be reasonable? At what point should I be worried about the process failing? 600M - day before yesterday 650M - yesterday 471M - a few minutes ago I gathered, from the docs, that the process is supposed to use all available memory, minus whatever it grudgingly allowed the OS to give away to other processes. Thanks for any thoughts you may relate, Gary Barnett Network Administrator Wells St. John P.S. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE - How much is too much?
Oooh. There's a thought; 'cept you'd have to call it molassis mail then, right? --Gary -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: STORE.EXE - How much is too much? I wonder if you can use Compact Flash cards to run the Store.exe on .. I have a few left over. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 5:50 PM Subject: RE: STORE.EXE - How much is too much? You didn't buy all that RAM to have it sit unused, now did you? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Barnett Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE - How much is too much? I am now confused on the operation of e2k sp2 store.exe process, as a result of reading this fine list :-) Let's just say for example that one had a single exchange server in their network. Let's also say that box has a fast processor (only one), with 1Gig of ram and also runs the 2nd DC and hosts a GC. Nothing else running on the server, especially anything from any AV vendor. Would the following store.exe sizes be reasonable? At what point should I be worried about the process failing? 600M - day before yesterday 650M - yesterday 471M - a few minutes ago I gathered, from the docs, that the process is supposed to use all available memory, minus whatever it grudgingly allowed the OS to give away to other processes. Thanks for any thoughts you may relate, Gary Barnett Network Administrator Wells St. John P.S. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS routing question:
thanks guys. That re-affirms what I thought in the first place. The IIS server is an interesting idea, however, I doubt that there will be any hops in between _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU
Over the last weekSTORE.EXE (Exchange 2000 SP2) is pegging the processor at 100%...I have never noticed it doing that in the past. Has anyone seen anything like this lately? I have also installed Q316056engi386.EXE but it did not change anything. Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Connector for Internet Mail
If you have the Exchange 2000 server joined to the 5.5 site, if you don't configure the SMTP virtual server, it will continue to use the 5.5 IMC. If you configure the virtual server in 2000, and change the costs, you shouldn't have to remove the 5.5 IMS at all. I would think that the 5.5's GWART would get modified and route accordingly. Of course, the relay idea mentioned earlier would definitely work, I'm just trying to think within the realms of 2000. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong (which happens more often than not) Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU
Any antivirus product scanning the store? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:43 PM Subject: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Over the last weekSTORE.EXE (Exchange 2000 SP2) is pegging the processor at 100%...I have never noticed it doing that in the past. Has anyone seen anything like this lately? I have also installed Q316056engi386.EXE but it did not change anything. Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU
Yes...Norton Corp 7.6 (I think the underlying product is 2.1) -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Any antivirus product scanning the store? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:43 PM Subject: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Over the last weekSTORE.EXE (Exchange 2000 SP2) is pegging the processor at 100%...I have never noticed it doing that in the past. Has anyone seen anything like this lately? I have also installed Q316056engi386.EXE but it did not change anything. Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Event: 2081
Anyone has any idea why this event is popping up every minutes? Thanks in advance. snip Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeDSAccess Event Category: Topology Event ID: 2081 Date: 6/24/2002 Time: 12:11:13 PM User: N/A Computer: EXCHANGE Description: Process WINMGMT.EXE (PID=920). DSAccess will use the servers from the following list: Domain Controllers: dc1.ats.ucla.edu dc2.ats.ucla.edu dc3.ats.ucla.edu Global Catalogs: dc1.ats.ucla.edu dc2.ats.ucla.edu dc3.ats.ucla.edu The Configuration Domain Controller is set to dc2.ats.ucla.edu. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folder Move
I am in the process of migrating all of my users (135) to an E2K box. I have looked at Ed's Server Move doc from the FAQ. Here is what the system looks like right now. Old server - NT 4 SP6a, Exch. 5.5 SP4, Domain A New server - 2000 SP2, Exch. 2000 SP2, Domain B A two-way trust is set up between the new domains. I have installed the new server into the existing site and set up the replication agreements. I migrated all the user accounts with ADMT. So far so good, everything replicated back to AD. I then went about replicating some PF to the new server. As soon as the replication took place, I could not view anything in or below a second level folder. For example: All Public Folders-| | --Org-| | ---Dept-| | ---Folder Once replicated, I cannot view any items in the 'Dept.' folder, nor can I see the 'Folder' item in the hierarchy view. The folders were still homed on the 5.5 server. I was pretty sure that this all worked OK on my test server so I am not sure what I am missing. Few more details: All of the users are still using their Domain A login accounts (SID History was migrated to Domain B accounts). Permissions were replicated exactly as they were on 5.5 to the PF. Default permissions are set to none for the folder I am having problems with. I can change default permission to reviewer, and then I can have full access to the folder (I have Owner rights). I am suspecting it has something to do with the domain accounts they are logging into/trusts, but am not sure where to go from here. Anyone seen anything or know anything about this problem? Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event: 2081
I was just reading this in the reskit so I thought I would post it, Event ID 1018, 1019, and 1022: Database is Damaged When performing backup and restore, you receive an Event ID 1018, 1019, or 1022: Database is damaged error message. This means that online backup cannot complete because the database is damaged. Solution Check the hardware for errors and complete a restore of this database as soon as possible. You can perform an offline backup so you have a recent copy of the database on tape even though it is damaged. Caution You should never delete logs from the system when performing an offline backup. The logs are required if you want to restore from the online backups. -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event: 2081 Anyone has any idea why this event is popping up every minutes? Thanks in advance. snip Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeDSAccess Event Category: Topology Event ID: 2081 Date: 6/24/2002 Time: 12:11:13 PM User: N/A Computer: EXCHANGE Description: Process WINMGMT.EXE (PID=920). DSAccess will use the servers from the following list: Domain Controllers: dc1.ats.ucla.edu dc2.ats.ucla.edu dc3.ats.ucla.edu Global Catalogs: dc1.ats.ucla.edu dc2.ats.ucla.edu dc3.ats.ucla.edu The Configuration Domain Controller is set to dc2.ats.ucla.edu. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Incoming Mail
Here a newbie questions for ya'll. Where does the incoming email go on an Exchange 2000 machine? Is there like a /var/spool directory where mail goes and is waiting to be read, or does the email automatically get redirected to the users mailbox. Thanks. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail
AH! A Unix user!! email goes into the information store database. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Incoming Mail Here a newbie questions for ya'll. Where does the incoming email go on an Exchange 2000 machine? Is there like a /var/spool directory where mail goes and is waiting to be read, or does the email automatically get redirected to the users mailbox. Thanks. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automatic Email Software
I am looking for software that will automatically send a precreated message at a predefined schedule or interval. I am wanting to do this to remind users and stores of different happenings that happen with the system on a regular occurance but not very frequently. Thanks for the help Ken Fanta _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail
Is there a way to see if a message is stuck in there and being sent over and over again? -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail AH! A Unix user!! email goes into the information store database. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Incoming Mail Here a newbie questions for ya'll. Where does the incoming email go on an Exchange 2000 machine? Is there like a /var/spool directory where mail goes and is waiting to be read, or does the email automatically get redirected to the users mailbox. Thanks. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Automatic Email Software
Ahhh, Outlook maybe? Geoff -Original Message- From: Fanta, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Automatic Email Software I am looking for software that will automatically send a precreated message at a predefined schedule or interval. I am wanting to do this to remind users and stores of different happenings that happen with the system on a regular occurance but not very frequently. Thanks for the help Ken Fanta _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Automatic Email Software
Or gee, Schedule +. or Word, or Excel, or Access, or . . . -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Automatic Email Software Ahhh, Outlook maybe? Geoff -Original Message- From: Fanta, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Automatic Email Software I am looking for software that will automatically send a precreated message at a predefined schedule or interval. I am wanting to do this to remind users and stores of different happenings that happen with the system on a regular occurance but not very frequently. Thanks for the help Ken Fanta _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail
I think I figured it out. C:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\Mailroot\vsi 1\Queue That wasn't so hard -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail AH! A Unix user!! email goes into the information store database. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Incoming Mail Here a newbie questions for ya'll. Where does the incoming email go on an Exchange 2000 machine? Is there like a /var/spool directory where mail goes and is waiting to be read, or does the email automatically get redirected to the users mailbox. Thanks. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Automatic Email Software
You can use one of the command prompt programs (for example: postie.exe) in a batch and schedule the batch to run on predefined intervals. -Original Message- From: Fanta, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Automatic Email Software I am looking for software that will automatically send a precreated message at a predefined schedule or interval. I am wanting to do this to remind users and stores of different happenings that happen with the system on a regular occurance but not very frequently. Thanks for the help Ken Fanta _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Automatic Email Software
Mapisend, postie or blat. -Original Message- From: Fanta, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Automatic Email Software I am looking for software that will automatically send a precreated message at a predefined schedule or interval. I am wanting to do this to remind users and stores of different happenings that happen with the system on a regular occurance but not very frequently. Thanks for the help Ken Fanta _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: V5.5 SP3 to SP4
Chris, Not quite as many- We've got 50 sites and two dedicated bridgehead servers, r 100 connectors on each bridgehead. It's been a while but I don't recall any issues when we went from SP3 to SP4. This is probably the hacks Nate was talking about... http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q200259 Cheers, Paul -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: V5.5 SP3 to SP4 Chris, The only thing I remember hearing is that there is some reghack you need in order to have over - I think the number was 20 - X.400 connectors. You are, however, way over that number so have probably already implemented that. The main thing I can forsee here is that the more X.400 connectors you have on a single server the more resources you chew up and the bigger the Administrative nightmare in your troubleshooting efforts. Regards. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Chris Jordan Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 06:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: V5.5 SP3 to SP4 We have a concern with an Exchange V5.5 SP3 to SP4 upgrade issue. The issue we have is: - We have over 300 X.400 connectors coming into a central hub site consisting of 4 servers. (150 remote sites, each with two connectors to different servers). - At present we need to stop and restart the hub MTAs a number of times each week. - SP4 is supposed to prevent this need for a restart on the MTAs. - BUT we have heard rumours [1] that say it might introduce worse problems because we have that number of connectors. Can anyone confirm, or deny, the rumours? Cheers, Chris [1] Someone installed SP4. The server crashed[2]. It had to be re-configured[3] from scratch. [2] It might or might not have been SP4 that caused the crash. [3] The Someone is no longer available, as he didn't take appropriate steps before the upgrade to allow a smooth recovery. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off topic-Mirapoint messaging solution.
This is a little off-topic. We recently went to a demonstration on Mirapoint messaging systems. We're looking at Mirapoint as a possible replacement to our aging student messaging system and potentially as front-end servers for all incoming messages to the University. I was wondering if anyone had any experience with the vendor and opinions of good, bad or other. I know we could do this with Exchange, we're talking about 40,000 users and we're looking at all options and associated costs. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, at 4:05pm, Vincent Avallone wrote: Where does the incoming email go on an Exchange 2000 machine? Is there like a /var/spool directory where mail goes and is waiting to be read, or does the email automatically get redirected to the users mailbox. I think I figured it out. C:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\Mailroot\vsi 1\Queue Nope, that is more like the /var/spool/mqueue directory on Unix (assuming you are running Sendmail). Exchange keeps all mail (and other objects) in a special database called the Information Store. The files are, by default, kept in the directory: C:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\MDBDATA\ A number of different files and formats exist in that directory -- private and public ESE database files, private and public STM database files, database transaction journals (logs), and maybe one or two other things. Those files are like nuclear fuel -- they can be very powerful, but one should not screw around with them. :-) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail
The bottom line is that I am trying to verify that the duplicate messages this one user is receiving from this one specific company, is not a piece of mail on my server being resent, but actually their email server resending the message -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, at 4:05pm, Vincent Avallone wrote: Where does the incoming email go on an Exchange 2000 machine? Is there like a /var/spool directory where mail goes and is waiting to be read, or does the email automatically get redirected to the users mailbox. I think I figured it out. C:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\Mailroot\vsi 1\Queue Nope, that is more like the /var/spool/mqueue directory on Unix (assuming you are running Sendmail). Exchange keeps all mail (and other objects) in a special database called the Information Store. The files are, by default, kept in the directory: C:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\MDBDATA\ A number of different files and formats exist in that directory -- private and public ESE database files, private and public STM database files, database transaction journals (logs), and maybe one or two other things. Those files are like nuclear fuel -- they can be very powerful, but one should not screw around with them. :-) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Notifications
Hi all, This is way off topic, but may have be solved with something from Exchange ... We have just purchased a copy of 'Servers Alive' to monitor our network servers (PDC, BDC, IIS, SQL, Exchange etc). Is there a preferred method of using a modem to send a text message or email to a mobile phone/pager ? The options we have is to purchase a 'special' agreement from Vodafone which uses their SMS server, or use their free service and send an email to a 'host' which relays it to the phone. Unfortunately, this isn't very efficient and I don't think we can trust it. Does Exchange provide a 'standard' method of sending a message to a mobile phone or is there something I can download from one of the Exchange sites ? Any ideas would be greatly received. Thanks, Tim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail
Might check the message headers for that. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail The bottom line is that I am trying to verify that the duplicate messages this one user is receiving from this one specific company, is not a piece of mail on my server being resent, but actually their email server resending the message -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, at 4:05pm, Vincent Avallone wrote: Where does the incoming email go on an Exchange 2000 machine? Is there like a /var/spool directory where mail goes and is waiting to be read, or does the email automatically get redirected to the users mailbox. I think I figured it out. C:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\Mailroot\vsi 1\Queue Nope, that is more like the /var/spool/mqueue directory on Unix (assuming you are running Sendmail). Exchange keeps all mail (and other objects) in a special database called the Information Store. The files are, by default, kept in the directory: C:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\MDBDATA\ A number of different files and formats exist in that directory -- private and public ESE database files, private and public STM database files, database transaction journals (logs), and maybe one or two other things. Those files are like nuclear fuel -- they can be very powerful, but one should not screw around with them. :-) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Notifications
Your question would be best answered by the Servers Alive! Mailing list http://www.woodstone.nu/salive/mailinglist.asp SMS is your best option. Aaron -Original Message- From: Tim John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Notifications Hi all, This is way off topic, but may have be solved with something from Exchange ... We have just purchased a copy of 'Servers Alive' to monitor our network servers (PDC, BDC, IIS, SQL, Exchange etc). Is there a preferred method of using a modem to send a text message or email to a mobile phone/pager ? The options we have is to purchase a 'special' agreement from Vodafone which uses their SMS server, or use their free service and send an email to a 'host' which relays it to the phone. Unfortunately, this isn't very efficient and I don't think we can trust it. Does Exchange provide a 'standard' method of sending a message to a mobile phone or is there something I can download from one of the Exchange sites ? Any ideas would be greatly received. Thanks, Tim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail
What type of mail is this? It wouldn't happen to be an Out of Office would it? -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail The bottom line is that I am trying to verify that the duplicate messages this one user is receiving from this one specific company, is not a piece of mail on my server being resent, but actually their email server resending the message -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, at 4:05pm, Vincent Avallone wrote: Where does the incoming email go on an Exchange 2000 machine? Is there like a /var/spool directory where mail goes and is waiting to be read, or does the email automatically get redirected to the users mailbox. I think I figured it out. C:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\Mailroot\vsi 1\Queue Nope, that is more like the /var/spool/mqueue directory on Unix (assuming you are running Sendmail). Exchange keeps all mail (and other objects) in a special database called the Information Store. The files are, by default, kept in the directory: C:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\MDBDATA\ A number of different files and formats exist in that directory -- private and public ESE database files, private and public STM database files, database transaction journals (logs), and maybe one or two other things. Those files are like nuclear fuel -- they can be very powerful, but one should not screw around with them. :-) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail
No -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail What type of mail is this? It wouldn't happen to be an Out of Office would it? -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail The bottom line is that I am trying to verify that the duplicate messages this one user is receiving from this one specific company, is not a piece of mail on my server being resent, but actually their email server resending the message -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, at 4:05pm, Vincent Avallone wrote: Where does the incoming email go on an Exchange 2000 machine? Is there like a /var/spool directory where mail goes and is waiting to be read, or does the email automatically get redirected to the users mailbox. I think I figured it out. C:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\Mailroot\vsi 1\Queue Nope, that is more like the /var/spool/mqueue directory on Unix (assuming you are running Sendmail). Exchange keeps all mail (and other objects) in a special database called the Information Store. The files are, by default, kept in the directory: C:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\MDBDATA\ A number of different files and formats exist in that directory -- private and public ESE database files, private and public STM database files, database transaction journals (logs), and maybe one or two other things. Those files are like nuclear fuel -- they can be very powerful, but one should not screw around with them. :-) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off Topic
I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic
www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail
You using a PIX firewall? SMTP fixup enabled? I have seen this happen with a PIX firewall on the receiving end. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail No -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail What type of mail is this? It wouldn't happen to be an Out of Office would it? -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail The bottom line is that I am trying to verify that the duplicate messages this one user is receiving from this one specific company, is not a piece of mail on my server being resent, but actually their email server resending the message -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, at 4:05pm, Vincent Avallone wrote: Where does the incoming email go on an Exchange 2000 machine? Is there like a /var/spool directory where mail goes and is waiting to be read, or does the email automatically get redirected to the users mailbox. I think I figured it out. C:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\Mailroot\vsi 1\Queue Nope, that is more like the /var/spool/mqueue directory on Unix (assuming you are running Sendmail). Exchange keeps all mail (and other objects) in a special database called the Information Store. The files are, by default, kept in the directory: C:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\MDBDATA\ A number of different files and formats exist in that directory -- private and public ESE database files, private and public STM database files, database transaction journals (logs), and maybe one or two other things. Those files are like nuclear fuel -- they can be very powerful, but one should not screw around with them. :-) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail
I already investigated this. We turned SMTP fixup off, but were still getting duplicates. Once we turn SMTP fixup off, do we have to do anything else;flush the cache etc? -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: Chris Anelick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail You using a PIX firewall? SMTP fixup enabled? I have seen this happen with a PIX firewall on the receiving end. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail No -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail What type of mail is this? It wouldn't happen to be an Out of Office would it? -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail The bottom line is that I am trying to verify that the duplicate messages this one user is receiving from this one specific company, is not a piece of mail on my server being resent, but actually their email server resending the message -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Incoming Mail On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, at 4:05pm, Vincent Avallone wrote: Where does the incoming email go on an Exchange 2000 machine? Is there like a /var/spool directory where mail goes and is waiting to be read, or does the email automatically get redirected to the users mailbox. I think I figured it out. C:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\Mailroot\vsi 1\Queue Nope, that is more like the /var/spool/mqueue directory on Unix (assuming you are running Sendmail). Exchange keeps all mail (and other objects) in a special database called the Information Store. The files are, by default, kept in the directory: C:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\MDBDATA\ A number of different files and formats exist in that directory -- private and public ESE database files, private and public STM database files, database transaction journals (logs), and maybe one or two other things. Those files are like nuclear fuel -- they can be very powerful, but one should not screw around with them. :-) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Notifications
We have our e-mail notifications sent to particular Exchange Custom Recipients. The SMTP address for that CR would be [EMAIL PROTECTED], for example. Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 If a man advances confidently in the direction of his dreams and endeavors to live a life which he has imagined, he will meet with a success unseen in common hours. ~Henry David Thoreau -Original Message- From: Tim John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Notifications Hi all, This is way off topic, but may have be solved with something from Exchange ... We have just purchased a copy of 'Servers Alive' to monitor our network servers (PDC, BDC, IIS, SQL, Exchange etc). Is there a preferred method of using a modem to send a text message or email to a mobile phone/pager ? The options we have is to purchase a 'special' agreement from Vodafone which uses their SMS server, or use their free service and send an email to a 'host' which relays it to the phone. Unfortunately, this isn't very efficient and I don't think we can trust it. Does Exchange provide a 'standard' method of sending a message to a mobile phone or is there something I can download from one of the Exchange sites ? Any ideas would be greatly received. Thanks, Tim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU
Are you running win2k adv srvr with = 1Gb RAM? Are you using /3GB switch in boot.ini? XGEN: Exchange 2000 Requires /3GB Switch with More Than 1 Gigabyte of Physical RAM (Q266096) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arch Willingham Sent: 24 June 2002 20:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Yes...Norton Corp 7.6 (I think the underlying product is 2.1) -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Any antivirus product scanning the store? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:43 PM Subject: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Over the last weekSTORE.EXE (Exchange 2000 SP2) is pegging the processor at 100%...I have never noticed it doing that in the past. Has anyone seen anything like this lately? I have also installed Q316056engi386.EXE but it did not change anything. Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic
In-Box rule? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: 24 June 2002 21:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDRs generated but not received by sender
When I go into Exchange System Manager - Message Tracking Center the messages in the log are the same: SMTP: Message Submitted to Advanced Queuing SMTP: Started Message Submission to Advance Queue SMTP: Message Submitted to Categorizer SMTP: Non-Delivery Report (NDR) Generated When I send messages from the test account at Yahoo, sometimes it sees the NDRs and sometimes it doesn't. When the Postmaster at m0.net said he had never received any NDRs I thought the problem might be on our end. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU
Nope...I only have 512k in it. -Original Message- From: Gary Aiston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 5:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Are you running win2k adv srvr with = 1Gb RAM? Are you using /3GB switch in boot.ini? XGEN: Exchange 2000 Requires /3GB Switch with More Than 1 Gigabyte of Physical RAM (Q266096) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arch Willingham Sent: 24 June 2002 20:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Yes...Norton Corp 7.6 (I think the underlying product is 2.1) -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Any antivirus product scanning the store? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:43 PM Subject: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Over the last weekSTORE.EXE (Exchange 2000 SP2) is pegging the processor at 100%...I have never noticed it doing that in the past. Has anyone seen anything like this lately? I have also installed Q316056engi386.EXE but it did not change anything. Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List of eventIDs to watch for...
I've been searching the MSExchange site (and some third party sites) for a list of E2K eventIDs that should be watched for. If anyone has a resource for a list of Events that should be considered critical, I would appreciate it. Thanks and have a nice day. --- Jeffrey Edgington Systems Administrator University of Missouri - Rolla Are you a Spectator or a Participant? --- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU
Any messages in the queue ? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:21 PM Subject: RE: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Yes...Norton Corp 7.6 (I think the underlying product is 2.1) -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Any antivirus product scanning the store? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 8:43 PM Subject: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU Over the last weekSTORE.EXE (Exchange 2000 SP2) is pegging the processor at 100%...I have never noticed it doing that in the past. Has anyone seen anything like this lately? I have also installed Q316056engi386.EXE but it did not change anything. Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off Topic
Check http://www.cdolive.com/code.htm -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:48 PM Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incoming Mail
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, at 4:39pm, Vincent Avallone wrote: The bottom line is that I am trying to verify that the duplicate messages this one user is receiving from this one specific company, is not a piece of mail on my server being resent, but actually their email server resending the message The first thing to do would be to check the detailed message headers. In MS Outlook, you do this via the View menu, Options item, and look for Internet Headers in the resulting dialog box (IIRC, depending on version). Pay close attention to Received and Message-ID headers. If that does not help, turn on/up SMTP logging, which is configured in the Properties dialog for the SMTP virtual server in Exchange System Manager. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: List of eventIDs to watch for...
ID10T can be a tough one. -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: List of eventIDs to watch for... I've been searching the MSExchange site (and some third party sites) for a list of E2K eventIDs that should be watched for. If anyone has a resource for a list of Events that should be considered critical, I would appreciate it. Thanks and have a nice day. --- Jeffrey Edgington Systems Administrator University of Missouri - Rolla Are you a Spectator or a Participant? --- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event: 2081
Do you have logging set too detailed? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of MS Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event: 2081 Anyone has any idea why this event is popping up every minutes? Thanks in advance. snip Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeDSAccess Event Category: Topology Event ID: 2081 Date: 6/24/2002 Time: 12:11:13 PM User: N/A Computer: EXCHANGE Description: Process WINMGMT.EXE (PID=920). DSAccess will use the servers from the following list: Domain Controllers: dc1.ats.ucla.edu dc2.ats.ucla.edu dc3.ats.ucla.edu Global Catalogs: dc1.ats.ucla.edu dc2.ats.ucla.edu dc3.ats.ucla.edu The Configuration Domain Controller is set to dc2.ats.ucla.edu. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Move
Is the Windows 2000 domain native mode? Maybe you have a permissions issue with public folders using distribution lists for authentication? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Anelick Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Move I am in the process of migrating all of my users (135) to an E2K box. I have looked at Ed's Server Move doc from the FAQ. Here is what the system looks like right now. Old server - NT 4 SP6a, Exch. 5.5 SP4, Domain A New server - 2000 SP2, Exch. 2000 SP2, Domain B A two-way trust is set up between the new domains. I have installed the new server into the existing site and set up the replication agreements. I migrated all the user accounts with ADMT. So far so good, everything replicated back to AD. I then went about replicating some PF to the new server. As soon as the replication took place, I could not view anything in or below a second level folder. For example: All Public Folders-| | --Org-| | ---Dept-| | ---Folder Once replicated, I cannot view any items in the 'Dept.' folder, nor can I see the 'Folder' item in the hierarchy view. The folders were still homed on the 5.5 server. I was pretty sure that this all worked OK on my test server so I am not sure what I am missing. Few more details: All of the users are still using their Domain A login accounts (SID History was migrated to Domain B accounts). Permissions were replicated exactly as they were on 5.5 to the PF. Default permissions are set to none for the folder I am having problems with. I can change default permission to reviewer, and then I can have full access to the folder (I have Owner rights). I am suspecting it has something to do with the domain accounts they are logging into/trusts, but am not sure where to go from here. Anyone seen anything or know anything about this problem? Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Converting to Plain Text at E2k outbout IMS
Hello, We send a lot of mail through our IMS to a local Meditech system that can only recieve mail in plain text. We are in the process of to an E2K sp2 site and I'm trying to set up a new entry in Internet Message Formats for the Meditech system.I began trying to emulate the settings on the existing Exchange 5.5 site (listed below) I've experimented with message encoding, Character sets, and setting Exchange rich-text format to Never Use. None of the changes I make in the Message Format entry effect a change in the format of messages received at the Meditech system. If I send in HTML format, Meditech receives a plain text version with =20 at the line feeds followed by a duplicate version of the message in raw HTML. A message sent as plain text is fine except for the =20 line feeds. I'm sure of the SMTP domain entry. Is there a piece I'm Missing? How can I tell if an email is actually being processed by my Internet Format Entry? Additional Information: The Exchange 5.5 sp4 site that we're migrating from converts to plain text that Meditech likes. The same SMTP domain in 5.5 has the following settings: Send Microsoft Exchange rich text formatting User Never message wrap Send Attachments using UUENCODE -- Binhex Character Set Translation -- MIME Western European (ISO -8859-1) -- Non-MIME USA ASCII Thanks in advance for any suggestions. Craig Yeutter Server Engineering Stanford Hospital and Clinics 650.724-6636 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic
But that will likely end up in constant mail loop chases. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Aiston Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic In-Box rule? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: 24 June 2002 21:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off Topic
Use a PF with a rule on it Works better. Then give only HR dept. appropriate access. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:44 PM Subject: RE: Off Topic But that will likely end up in constant mail loop chases. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Aiston Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic In-Box rule? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: 24 June 2002 21:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU
Arch, yes I have seen this happen twice. Once was due to Antivirus scanning mailboxes and the M: drive. (Exclude M: drive) Once was due to Public Folder replication to another site. One public folder was set to replicate with a site which was Exchange 5.0 . Just after starting the Information store Store.exe used 100%CPU and stayed there. After applying recommended patches and updates the problem continued to happen. As soon as I stopped replication on the recently changed public folder the CPU returned to normal. Danny Mills Arch Willingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED] bounce-exchange-48804@ls cc: .swynk.com Subject: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU 25/06/2002 04:43 AM Please respond to Exchange Discussions Over the last weekSTORE.EXE (Exchange 2000 SP2) is pegging the processor at 100%...I have never noticed it doing that in the past. Has anyone seen anything like this lately? I have also installed Q316056engi386.EXE but it did not change anything. Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Automatic Email Software
Ken, Lots of ways to do this, mapisend, blat, a smtp mailer, Outlook or anything at can use the CDO COM obejcts (Access, VB, Word, Excel etc). Depends on what your requirements are I guess. You can use the schedule service on a server to spawn a blat or other commend at a predefined interval, its really not that difficult. Glenn - Original Message - From: Fanta, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 5:43 AM Subject: Automatic Email Software I am looking for software that will automatically send a precreated message at a predefined schedule or interval. I am wanting to do this to remind users and stores of different happenings that happen with the system on a regular occurance but not very frequently. Thanks for the help Ken Fanta _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: List of eventIDs to watch for...
Jeff, umm, pretty much any event with a class of Error (as opposed to information or warning errors). Exchange is pretty good like that. It depends on what you are trying to look out for / prevent. Exchange can literally fill the event logs every few minutes if you want it to (just ramp up logging on everything to full), it depends on what you are trying to look out for. But, watching for critial / error events is a good start. Most halfway decent event log tools can filter by Error / Critical events. Glenn - Original Message - From: Edgington, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:23 AM Subject: List of eventIDs to watch for... I've been searching the MSExchange site (and some third party sites) for a list of E2K eventIDs that should be watched for. If anyone has a resource for a list of Events that should be considered critical, I would appreciate it. Thanks and have a nice day. --- Jeffrey Edgington Systems Administrator University of Missouri - Rolla Are you a Spectator or a Participant? --- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic
I don't understand how a public folder rule is any less susceptable to mail loops than an inbox rule. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Off Topic Use a PF with a rule on it Works better. Then give only HR dept. appropriate access. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:44 PM Subject: RE: Off Topic But that will likely end up in constant mail loop chases. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Aiston Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic In-Box rule? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: 24 June 2002 21:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ESM Status bar
Neil, pretty handy actually. Thanks for your help. Danny Mills Neil Hobson Neil.Hobson@silversands To: Exchange Discussions .co.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: cc: bounce-exchange-48804@ls Subject: RE: ESM Status bar .swynk.com 24/06/2002 05:02 PM Please respond to Exchange Discussions You're not missing anything. Try this: In ADUC, right-click your domain name at the top and choose Find. In the Find combo box, choose Exchange Recipients. On the General tab you can select which type of object to search for. On the Storage tab, choose the relevant option, e.g. mailboxes on a particular server etc, then click the Find button. Not as quick as in 5.5 days, but you get used to it. Neil -Original Message- From: Danny Mills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 24 June 2002 02:01 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: ESM Status bar Subject: ESM Status bar Using 5.5 Admin you could see the number of objects in each Container. This was very handy. Using ESM on 2000 with the Status Bar and other options turned on I cannot see the number of objects displayed anywhere. The Three column Status Bar at the bottom of the window is empty. Is this by design? or am I missing something? Thanks Danny Mills _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Address List/Active Directory query
I have come in this morning and this problem has been resolved. I believe the problem was because this user was on an exchange 5.5 server and the ADC wasn't working properly (wrong ldap port). Thanks -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 25 June 2002 1:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Address List/Active Directory query Be sure the recipient update service is running. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Duane Purcell Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 11:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Address List/Active Directory query I have a problem where there is a user in the exchange address list, but I cannot find this user in Active Directory Users Computers. In Exchange System Manager, I have previewed the All Users list and the user shows up. I have copied this ldap query into a Custom find ADSI Edit and the user is not displayed in either. What could cause this? I'm at a loss to where this info is stored. I am trying to delete this user from the email lists because it is wrong and it is stopping the creation of another because the email address is already in use. Environment: 15 Exchange 5.5 (SP4), 2 Exchange 2000 domains (SP2). Servers are NT4/SP5, Windows 2000/SP2. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: List of eventIDs to watch for...
1018 and 1019 are bad ones - Original Message - From: Edgington, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 5:23 PM Subject: List of eventIDs to watch for... I've been searching the MSExchange site (and some third party sites) for a list of E2K eventIDs that should be watched for. If anyone has a resource for a list of Events that should be considered critical, I would appreciate it. Thanks and have a nice day. --- Jeffrey Edgington Systems Administrator University of Missouri - Rolla Are you a Spectator or a Participant? --- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: STORE.EXE is pegging 100% of CPU
I have had a similar experience but not with Exchange 2K. I am running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and it seems that around a week ago we had a number of users that had emails stuck in their outbox. We could not open the email or delete it. We had to export the mailbox to a PST open the PST, delete the message, then delete the Exchange mailbox, recreate the mailbox and reimport the PST and the problem stopped. Unfortunately the problem keeps occurring and evertime it causes the CPU to go to 100% utilized. I am not sure what to do, anybody have any suggestions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic
Set up a rule that reply's with a preset message and / or attachments Bret Cohen Viacom Information Services and Technology mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event: 2081
If this is only happening on one server, I'd check the Diagnostic Logging tab on the properties of the server in question. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of MS Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event: 2081 Anyone has any idea why this event is popping up every minutes? Thanks in advance. snip Event Type: Information Event Source: MSExchangeDSAccess Event Category: Topology Event ID: 2081 Date: 6/24/2002 Time: 12:11:13 PM User: N/A Computer: EXCHANGE Description: Process WINMGMT.EXE (PID=920). DSAccess will use the servers from the following list: Domain Controllers: dc1.ats.ucla.edu dc2.ats.ucla.edu dc3.ats.ucla.edu Global Catalogs: dc1.ats.ucla.edu dc2.ats.ucla.edu dc3.ats.ucla.edu The Configuration Domain Controller is set to dc2.ats.ucla.edu. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Move
Is Domain B in Native Mode? Exchange 2000 really like universal security groups... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Anelick Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Move I am in the process of migrating all of my users (135) to an E2K box. I have looked at Ed's Server Move doc from the FAQ. Here is what the system looks like right now. Old server - NT 4 SP6a, Exch. 5.5 SP4, Domain A New server - 2000 SP2, Exch. 2000 SP2, Domain B A two-way trust is set up between the new domains. I have installed the new server into the existing site and set up the replication agreements. I migrated all the user accounts with ADMT. So far so good, everything replicated back to AD. I then went about replicating some PF to the new server. As soon as the replication took place, I could not view anything in or below a second level folder. For example: All Public Folders-| | --Org-| | ---Dept-| | ---Folder Once replicated, I cannot view any items in the 'Dept.' folder, nor can I see the 'Folder' item in the hierarchy view. The folders were still homed on the 5.5 server. I was pretty sure that this all worked OK on my test server so I am not sure what I am missing. Few more details: All of the users are still using their Domain A login accounts (SID History was migrated to Domain B accounts). Permissions were replicated exactly as they were on 5.5 to the PF. Default permissions are set to none for the folder I am having problems with. I can change default permission to reviewer, and then I can have full access to the folder (I have Owner rights). I am suspecting it has something to do with the domain accounts they are logging into/trusts, but am not sure where to go from here. Anyone seen anything or know anything about this problem? Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
