Before I start, I hold my hands up - I'm being lazy.
I have a number of contacts which I have exported into a pst file which I now
want as Windows 2000 contacts (ie, the E2K equivalent of custom recipients).
I realise I can export these from Outlook in .csv format, then import them
into W2K via
I have a problem which relates to some kind of Exchange/IIS/AD issues, and I was
wondering if anyone can help. Long post which might eliminate a bunch of have you
tried this questions or its a security issue statements.
The symptoms of the problem only appear when using OWA but I don't think
I am running outlook 2000 and the mail server is
exchange 5.5. I am the owner of two mailboxes my
default and the other for support mails, my query is
when I delete mails from the support mail box it
appears in the deleted item folder of my main mailbox.
Why is it so. And is there a setting I can
It is the same with sent items. This would be by design I would assume.
With Sent Items, you can change the location to the other mailbox. Or
at least give permission to copy items there. I have never tried this
with deleted items.
hehe - Not to mention the probability that there arent any storage limits on
that folder!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 7:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic
I don't understand how a public folder rule is
I wouldnt be too happy with a 1022 either.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: List of eventIDs to watch for...
1018 and 1019 are bad ones
- Original Message -
From:
Dear List,
In the Application Log the Event ID:12002 is generating every 5 Minutes. I search the
Error on MS KB, but unfortunately not able to find the solution.
Here is the Error:
Source: MSExchangeIS
Category: Content Engine
Event ID: 12002
Type: Error
Mongo let replies out to Internet.
-Original Message-
From: Cohen, Bret [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic
Set up a rule that reply's with a preset message and / or attachments
Bret Cohen
Viacom Information
Q202517
-Original Message-
From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Changing location of deleted mails
I am running outlook 2000 and the mail server is
exchange 5.5. I am the owner of two mailboxes my
default
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 June 2002 00:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic
I don't understand how a public folder rule is any less
susceptable to mail loops than an inbox rule.
I think we're back to closing our
Neat.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changing location of deleted mails
Q202517
-Original Message-
From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL
You're awake?
And I thought I lived in the city that never sleeps!
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changing location of deleted mails
Neat.
-Original Message-
All
As far as I am aware I do not have any limits set ... but I have just
received an NDR in the postmaster account. Any ideas ???
Ex 5.5 Sp4 NT4 Sp6a
***
A mail message was not sent due to a protocol error.
Hi,
You should check if there is an Limit on your Firewall / ISP.
Frank
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2002 14:03
An: Exchange Discussions
Betreff: Mail Limits
All
As far as I am aware I do not have any
Post the entire NDR. If you dont have limits, the recipient does.
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 8:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mail Limits
All
As far as I am aware I do not have any limits set ... but
Search on 8004010F rather than the event id. This will pull up a lot more
KB articles
-Original Message-
From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 June 2002 13:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Event ID:12002
Dear List,
In the Application Log the Event ID:12002 is
them i'd wager
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 8:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mail Limits
All
As far as I am aware I do not have any limits set ... but I have just
received an NDR in the postmaster
Thanks for your reply. I have searched it but unfortunately non of them matching with
this error.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 5:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Event ID:12002
Search on
I sleep during the day when it's hot.
Other than that, Las Vegas also never sleeps.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changing location of deleted
The maibox you are sending to has the limit
Chris Quinn
IT Manager
Blue Planet Aquarium
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 June 2002 13:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mail Limits
All
As far as I am aware I do not have any limits
And at eventid.net, it's on the list of events requiring more
information. :o|
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange List
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 6:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Event ID:12002
Thanks for your
Dear All,
In our Exchange 5.5 network we have two messaging bridgehead servers set
up to act as each others backup. All company divisions are connected to
these servers with X400 connectors. The first half of the divisions have a
X400 connector connected to the first server with a cost level of
Are you saying that you can't find any articles or that the articles you
find are simply not relevant to your problem?
I found 17 articles on the public web-site when I put that string into the
KB search at http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=kbinfo or 18 if I
just go to
Is that New York or Las Vegas?
--
From: Andy David
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 06:51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Changing location of deleted mails
You're awake?
And I thought I lived in the city that never sleeps!
copied and pasted
Create a distribution list (using Exchange Adminstrator) and a public folder
(using Outlook)
In Exchange Administrator set the email address for the public folder to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Add the public folder as a member of the distribution list. (In Exchange
Administrator,
Do you read this as saying their server cannot find the recipient or our
server cannot hand off to their mail server? I need to settle a bet! ;)
Reporting-MTA: dns;chims1002.TRANSORA1.ECPG.NET
Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.kacpi.com
Arrival-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:44:54 -0500
Final-Recipient:
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 June 2002 14:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Help in Deciphering . . .
Do you read this as saying their server cannot find the
recipient or our server cannot hand off to their mail server?
I need to
Sorry, forgot to include that info. Yes, the 2000 domain is in native mode.
The DL replicated as universal security groups into AD, and the membership
was also correct. Also, the permissions are not limited to DLs, as my
account is listed separately as an owner for some of these folders.
Can you see the PF hierarchy in ESM?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Anelick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 June 2002 14:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Move
Sorry, forgot to include that info. Yes, the 2000 domain is in native mode.
The DL replicated as
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q284204
Numerical Code: 4.4.7
Possible Cause: The message in the queue has expired. The sending server
tried to relay or deliver the message but the action was not completed
before the message expiration time occurred. This message can
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Move
Can you see the PF hierarchy in ESM?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Anelick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25
Well the code to say the server can't find an account at all is a permanent
error, a 5.x.x code.
5.1.1. according to my (faulty) memory and the kb article below.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 June 2002 14:50
To: Exchange Discussions
I did. Cha-ching! My boss thinks it is that the recipient server cannot find
the mailbox . . .
Thanks for the 2 cents from everyone . . .
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Oh my god... it's a properly phrased technical question. Someone take a
picture.
No quick answer is jumping out at me, but it sounds to me like possibly a
problem with the GC in the local site. I hate to resort to a standard PSS
troubleshooting technique... but have you tried rerunning
By product design and www.slipstick.com might have links to a utility which
changes the behavior.
-Original Message-
From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 6:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Changing location of deleted mails
I am running
Hello all
just wanted to know what the consensus was on installing this patch on the
OWA server. I did read some early reports with some problems, but there
hasn't been that much input. I am assuming that you all have installed with
no problems? Thank you for your input...
Dave
Title:
Ok, I have a user who is sending out meeting request, but when he receives a
confirmation from the parties he sent the request to, he receives an error
stating that the request doesn't exist in his calender, also he is receiving
the unable to update free/busy schedule information and I checked
Do you have any business requirement for htr?
Its much better IMO to simply remove it.
-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MS02-028
Hello all
just wanted to know what the
One of our users (userA) accuses userB of attempting to read his email.
The evidence is:-
1 Within Exchange admin, in the mailbox resources window, the Windows
NT account is displaying userB.
2 An event log id 1016 occurred stating userB logged onto userA
mailbox and is not the
Make sure that things are not being delivered to a PST
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Two Issues
Ok, I have a user who is sending out meeting request, but when he receives a
Yes dear god I believe that 3KB of that 4KB message is the disclaimer
alone. Good thing you don't pay for bandwidth per Meg :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 8:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
UserB checking the calendar of UserA
Someone pretending to be userB
-Original Message-
From: Taylor, Mal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 June 2002 16:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox Privacy
One of our users (userA) accuses userB of attempting to read his email.
Under Exchange 2000 is there a way to turn on auto-replies to the internet
for a single user?
Running in mixed mode with Ex5.5 at this time.
Ron
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
You say that you joined an Exchange 55 Organisation which had multiple
sites. Presumably this will mean that originally you had recipient policies
that matched the original Site Addressing. Having domainprepped your AD
domain and installed a RUS, new users will pick up whatever addresses the
We've seen this when people inherit old boxen and change (as opposed to
deleting and creating a new one) the profile on the machine. Some hooks to
the old mailbox remain and the event is generated when the user starts up
Outlook.
I agree with the rest of the crowd, though - turn off the
Did you use ADMT to clone NT4 SIDs onto ADC-created AD account Sidhistories
or did you use the ADClean method to merge separate accounts created by
ADMT?
Regardless I'd take a look at Q309222 and check that the
msexchmasteraccountsid value is not populated for enabled users in AD. Also
if you
Now that is a disclaimer. I think you left out the part about the
destruction of sensitive documents.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 8:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox Privacy
User B could have viewed
Mark asks:
You say that you joined an Exchange 55 Organisation which had
snip
on an FE server)
Mark we created a new organisation and did a mailbox migration.
The exchange orgs never knew about each other.
Now with one Front-end OWA box, all your users will need to
have at least one SMTP
So that can't happen of course. But maybe . . .
If somehow the replies were being managed in an out of date version of the
store (running with the PST idea).
Is rule moving the calendar replies to a PST folder, and then the responses
being worked later, when off-line? That could create the
SQ = Stupid Question
Hi,
I need to find proof that a message sent last Monday was actually sent
out...
where do I find it? (first time this happens, so I never looked into
it...)
Kim
_
List posting FAQ:
I need to find proof that a message sent last Monday was
actually sent out...
where do I find it? (first time this happens, so I never looked into
it...)
Exchange system manager - Tools - Message tracking centre
You do have the logs retained for more than 1 day, eh?
All the best,
Andy
PS I'm not sure that constitutes proof but its the closest you'll get.
A
-Original Message-
From: Andy Grafton
Sent: 25. juni 2002 18:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SQ - urgent
I need to find proof that a message sent last Monday was
actually sent out...
That doesn't do anything...
-Original Message-
From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 June, 2002 6:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SQ - urgent
PS I'm not sure that constitutes proof but its the closest you'll get.
A
-Original Message-
From: Andy
Unless you have message tracking enabled (which is off by default), you
cant.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SQ - urgent
SQ = Stupid Question
Hi,
I need to find proof that a
Next time have the sender set the Request Read Receipt option.
- Original Message -
From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:21 PM
Subject: RE: SQ - urgent
That doesn't do anything...
-Original Message-
lol... Trying to spur sales of WYB?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 12:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: SQ - urgent
Next time have the sender set the Request Read Receipt option.
- Original Message
Thanks for the help with this.
The problem was users lacking an SMTP address corresponding to the domain name which
the Exchange Server uses in its fully qualified name. With that added in, things work
normally and OWA for my problem users seems to function just fine.
All the best,
Andy
as I said, I found it, but from the moment it goes to the relay I don't
know anything anymore...
also, why does the message tracking only works on a specific date?
gosh, you have spycams to see how everyone is sitting on their chairs?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL
And if I reply to the message that's on a mailing list that has thousands of
readers, then I get many gift certificates!!
Woo hoo! The Sojka's are going to Disneyland!!
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:54 PM
To:
For MEC!
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SQ - urgent
And if I reply to the message that's on a mailing list that has thousands of
readers, then I get many gift certificates!!
Just wondering if this field could be used for any practical reasons in
Exchange
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
ROFLMAO -- wait does this count?
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SQ - urgent
Then do you log on the relay server? SMTP is all about ownership of the
message. Once the Exchange
Yo.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SQ - urgent
For MEC!
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002
They have a parade and a castle, right?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SQ - urgent
Oops, typo. Its actually a gift certificate to This Knee
Land. Sorry about
the
Running SBS2k with exchange sp2 installed on it.
When I try and access OWA I get this error when it comes up:
-2147467259
I can click ok to this and then owa opens up, but it opens up without the public
folders.
So far when I am on site and do : http://machinename/exchange/ I get in with no
Have you configured a virtual server for the FQDN of the server. This
should be done in ESM\IIS mmc, copy the default permissions etc.
Yours,
Julian Stone
Exchange 2000 Consultant
This message sent from Exchange 2000 SP3 build 6212
Netstore - Europe's Leading Application Service Provider
Reapply SP2.
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Issues No Public Folders Showing up
Running SBS2k with exchange sp2 installed on it.
When I try and access OWA I get
I am having a weird problem. I have users in my company that can send
email just fine to a particular email address. But I have other users
that get the following NDR when they send to the same address. This is
a single Exchange2K server, sp2. Everyone is configured the same.
Any ideas?
Can you send mail to them using raw telnet with that from address?
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird NDR
I am having a weird problem. I have users in my company that
I am curious as to what is the best practices to utilize a DMZ and
Exchange 2000. I am trying to avoide opening up port 25 to my internal
network where my exchange server is. I don't want to put the exchange
server on the DMZ. So what are the most secure solutions. Should I go
with a front
Usually indicates a bad remote SMTP response to EHLO. But if the other can
send it may be you are sending to a group of email servers and all are not
configured the same or a firewall issue
Just a guess
- Original Message -
From: Exchange Server [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
Put %smtp relay% wherever you'd like it to be. DMZ is fine.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Best Practice to utilize a DMZ with Exchange
I am curious as to what is the best
I am unable to send mail using raw telnet when sending from the user
[EMAIL PROTECTED] if I use [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the Mail From
it works finesee below!
220 mxsmta02.inithost.com ESMTP server (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06
201-253-122-11
106-20010523) ready Tue, 25 Jun 2002 15:21:43 -0400
Helo
Looks like that'd be the problem of whoever maintains mxsmta02.inithost.com.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: weird NDR
I am unable to send mail using raw telnet when
Recently we began our Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade and an issue has come up
that wasn't discovered in testing. We have several users with hidden
mailboxes for one reason or another. Most just want privacy and don't want
their information available. Anyhow, under Exchange 5.5 with MAPI clients
As in forwarding address for a mail enabled contact?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: 25 June 2002 19:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: AD field forwardingAddress
Just wondering if this field could be used for
Outlook 98, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a.
Is it possible to block User 1 from trying to make an appointment on User
2's calendar? We have a few management employees (User 2) that do not put
EVERYTHING they do on their calendar, and they
would prefer not to have other people trying to make an
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. - EC
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Appointments.
Outlook 98, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a.
Is it
Exactly. And couldnt they just decline the request?
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:11 PM
Subject: RE: Appointments.
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral
Try the legacyExchnageDN.
-Original Message-
From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:41 PM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue.
Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue.
Recently we began our Exchange 5.5
Typing is bad today: legacyExchangeDN
-Original Message-
From: Exchange
Posted At: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:27 PM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue.
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue.
Try the legacyExchnageDN.
-Original Message-
You can't stop them from trying, you can only stop them from succeeding.
You are talking about SENDING an appointment REQUEST, aren't you? It's a
request, not a mandate.
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:09 PM
To:
Ok, that attribute has the data I need, but how do I get the Outlook client
to read it?
-
Thank you,
Pete Kretche
MCP, A+
Network Systems Administrator
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
(920) 465-5014
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
Yep, like I said, declining is the easiest approach. But if there is a
solution where the calendar can not be viewed, they want to use it. They
would rather have it blocked than repeatedly deny daily request. Silly?
Yes. But I'm just a peon. So I must research the matter.
-Original
Yep, trying to block the request.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Appointments.
You can't stop them from trying, you can only stop them from succeeding.
You are talking about
Unless you have modified the default settings on the calendar, this is not
possible in the first place. The default permission settings for each users
calendar is for, Default No access.
So unless privileges have been granted by user a or for user a, User B cannot
place an item on User A's
Understood sir. They just want to not even receive a request in the first
place.
Like I said, the easiest thing for them to do is click Deny Request, but
they don't even want to see the request. Someone suggested using the rules
wizard to filter it out. I'll give that a try tomorrow. It's
I've had a lot of success with stand-alone servers in the DMZ
- throw an AV scanner on it and relay inbound mail through it
- throw ISA on it and publish OWA there; you can even terminate the SSL
connection there if you are so inclined.
- the nice thing about stand alone servers is that you don't
You could also set a reoccurring appointment on their calendar that goes on
forever (24-7-365) and set Outlook to automatically process appointment
requests and decline conflicting requests.
When the meeting is requested/composed this person's free busy information
will appear to always be
Forward your request to the Exchange administrator then... Admins
administrate, peons follow orders blindly.
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Appointments.
Yep, like I
It was almost certainly something very simple. Look at the time stamp. By
any chance was their mail server off-line for a few minutes for an end of
the day service activity?
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 12:13 PM
To:
You might be able to have the request deleted through a Rules Wizard
rule.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of McCready,
Yes, and giant rats and dogs.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:25 AM
To:
I have been pondering the idea of moving my postmaster mailbox from a
mailbox to a public folder so I can assign age limits and such (I can
easily get up to 100,000 emails of junk during a 7 day period). Are
there any drawbacks to doing this (in either Exchange 5.5 or 2k)?
Do you read them all?? Have you looked at Added old employees email
address to a blank DL so they disappear?
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
It is just basic postmaster junkspam...ndr's...etc. I do look
through certain items (the rest is filtered with rules).
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Postmaster as a public
I read them when I get bored with all of the lists I'm on... Does that
count?
Don Ely - NMBOTWBAS and then some
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 5:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Postmaster as
Teach them ALL to use the Private setting for their calendar. This lets
them see their calendar true and complete. It Does not let others see what
they are doing, but shows them that they are not available during that
period.
I suppose they could set their free/busy to publish 0 (zero) months,
I used to get about 30,000 a day.. Got that down to 1000 now. And
sometimes I read those now.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
What you can do, however, is enable automatic replies / forwards / oof
etc. to a particular domain.
Auto Replies to the world are a bad idea in general, but particularly if
you are concerned about SPAM. Just think of an auto-reply as an
auto-confirm to the next piece of spam you receive. Spin
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
