RE: backup failure

2002-09-04 Thread Les Bessant
There is no secret cabal.[1] [1] Was that denial convincing enough?[2] [2] I get a lot of practice denying things Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Coming soon: the new, improved

RE: backup failure

2002-09-04 Thread Les Bessant
I get them from time to time. Sometimes months late But they never tell me what it is I'm not supposed to say, which is quite unhelpful. After all, I wouldn't want to offend anyone -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 September 2002 04:24

RE: backup failure

2002-09-04 Thread Les Bessant
I got a Sex Words[1] one this time. [1] I've censored the offending term[2] [2] Unless they're picking up on backup or something -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 September 2002 11:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: backup failure I get

RE: backup failure

2002-09-04 Thread Les Bessant
OK, this is silly. Apparently mentioning their S?x Words filter is enough to set it off. I'd say what I thought of such filtering, but I don't want any more of those silly messages. -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 September 2002 11:28 To:

RE: Haiku Friday

2002-09-04 Thread Chinnery Paul
Well, I sent it on Friday Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 10:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Time blurred, what day this? I mean,

RE: Haiku Friday

2002-09-04 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Maybe Swink has been bought out by the Post Office:-) -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 September 2002 01:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Well, I sent it on Friday Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr

RE: backup failure

2002-09-04 Thread Great Cthulhu Jones
Well, heaven forfend we should discuss setting up Exchange for a neo-Nazi pro-abortion anti-homosexual terrorist organization funded by cocaine sales, prostitution networks, and bake sales. That would set off a few filters. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: backup failure

2002-09-04 Thread Les Bessant
That should fix it. Some people really have a problem with c*k*s and the like. -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 September 2002 13:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: backup failure Well, heaven forfend we should discuss setting up

RE: backup failure

2002-09-04 Thread Tom.Gray
Pauli: This is the second post you've made today with very little information. You may have noticed the responses you got were about as informative as the question you asked. Please include your version of Exchange, the name and version of your backup software and other things such as your

OWA Problem in forntend/backend setup

2002-09-04 Thread jojo.solis
anyone here experienced this kind of problem. i'd setup OWA using the frontend/backend technology the frontend server is used for OWA access only using port 8080 in communicating with the client requests and the backend server is configured to use port 80 in communicating with the frontend

RE: OWA Problem in forntend/backend setup

2002-09-04 Thread Gonzalez, Alex
You probably did but did you check the box that says this is a front end server? Also why can't you put them both on the same port? When you the client goes to the address are they putting the x.com:8080/exchange? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: backup failure

2002-09-04 Thread Leo Ballester
That is a good idea But I think you are bias... Chris the Crusher ??? I don't like mine! Can you change it please? We can make some money here... -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 9:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: backup failure

2002-09-04 Thread Leo Ballester
Just did... Feel much better thank you... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 9:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: backup failure It may be time for you to get back on your medicine. -Original Message-

RE: backup failure

2002-09-04 Thread Leo Ballester
I will see you in HELL :-) -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 10:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: backup failure Well done, Leo. You have single-handedly pissed off at least 17 secret cabals who are now

Recovering Deleted Public Folder

2002-09-04 Thread Aamir Hanif
Guys: Someone at our office deleted a Public Folder this morning. Unfortunately, this folder was created yesterday and we did not do a backup last night. I have set the properties on the Public Folders so that they are not permanently deleted. Does anyone know how I can recover the folder?

RE: Recovering Deleted Public Folder

2002-09-04 Thread Brian Dugas
Why didn't you do a backup last night? Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.summit-technical.com Phone: 401-736-8323 x11 Fax: 401-738-9813 -Original Message- From: Aamir Hanif

RE: backup failure

2002-09-04 Thread Bill Kuhl
We switched from Arcserve 2000 to Veritas and getting Veritas to make a clean backup with no errors has not been a piece of cake. After getting the bug fixes and getting the backup accounts setup just right, it is getting close to working 100 percent. Bill Kuhl

RE: backup failure

2002-09-04 Thread Woodruff, Michael
Are you sure you don't have those products switched around? -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: backup failure We switched from Arcserve 2000 to Veritas and getting Veritas to

RE: backup failure

2002-09-04 Thread Bill Kuhl
Certain of that. The biggest problem has been getting the SQL databases and the system state on one of the servers to backup correctly. The Exchange backup has gone pretty well. Bill Kuhl -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September

RE: OWA Problem in forntend/backend setup

2002-09-04 Thread jojo.solis
You probably did but did you check the box that says this is a front end server? yes i did check that box and restarted the server. Also why can't you put them both on the same port? because ISA server is also setup on the frontend server and its using the port 80, this box is already in

RE: OWA Problem in forntend/backend setup

2002-09-04 Thread Chris Scharff
If the same user tried to log into the backend server directly using OWA, are they successful? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/4/2002 8:10 AM Subject: OWA Problem in forntend/backend setup anyone here experienced this kind of problem. i'd

Re: Recovering Deleted Public Folder

2002-09-04 Thread Missy Koslosky
Recover deleted items should work if you have it enabled. There's a Q article on how to do this for a PF. Missy - Original Message - From: Aamir Hanif [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:33 AM Subject: Recovering Deleted

Re: Haiku Friday

2002-09-04 Thread Steven A. Christensen
Ouch. Guess who I'm working for... - Original Message - From: Sander Van Butzelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 06:54 Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Maybe Swink has been bought out by the Post Office:-) -Original

RE: Recovering Deleted Public Folder

2002-09-04 Thread Aamir Hanif
Thanks all. I got it. Aamir. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Recovering Deleted Public Folder Recover deleted items should work if you have it enabled. There's a Q

Re: backup failure

2002-09-04 Thread Missy Koslosky
you are backing up mailboxes, not the information stores. Check your documentation, or see the FAQ. - Original Message - From: paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 9:19 AM Subject: backup failure Hi, My backup have failed

Full Text Indexing

2002-09-04 Thread Allan Johnson
My email packrats (err users) have asked for the ability to do full text searches against mail messages and attachments. I would appreciate any feedback on available products, hopefully use/don't use. Slipstick has a number of options and I have also read Integrating Microsoft Site Server

OT: Win2K SP3 good to go?

2002-09-04 Thread Orin Rehorst
Has the smoke settled...with Win2K SP3 O.K. to apply? TIA, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html

RE: Full Text Indexing

2002-09-04 Thread EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
What's wrong with using find under tools? This will allow them to search their own mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full Text Indexing My email packrats (err

RE: Full Text Indexing

2002-09-04 Thread Hurst, Paul
Doesn't look inside attachments, need something like KVS but for live Email not just Archived messages. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: Full Text Indexing

2002-09-04 Thread Allan Johnson
It is the desire to search Attachment content that they really want. All of the products I have looked at report the ability to search most MS Office formats, .txt, some .zip etc etc. Plus an indexing feature would greatly increase the speed of the search, some of my users are 600+MB packrats.

RE: Win2K SP3 good to go?

2002-09-04 Thread Julian Stone
Go for it apply Exchange SP3 as well. You have tried it in your labsright ?? Yours, Julian Stone -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 September 2002 15:53 pm To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Win2K SP3 good to go? Has the smoke

RE: Full Text Indexing

2002-09-04 Thread EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
Err on earlier response. You would need 3rd party app. to search attachments. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full Text Indexing My email packrats (err users) have asked for

Desperate Newbie

2002-09-04 Thread James Liddil
W2K SP3,E2K SP3, AD. I noticed my store.exe using almost 500,000 K and the CPU pegged at 100%. This is a dual 866 processor box with 1 gig of RAM. I stopped and restarted the IS and this clear the memory usage problem. But the CPU is still pegged at 100%. I don't want to reboot as of yet. I

RE: Desperate Newbie

2002-09-04 Thread Dale Geoffrey Edwards
You have AV software running on this machine? You might look the way of your AV software. Geoff... -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Desperate Newbie W2K SP3,E2K SP3,

RE: Full Text Indexing

2002-09-04 Thread Allan Johnson
Correct, well almost MS does have a couple of solutions. Really I was just hoping someone has implemented something to meet this need, and might have an opinion. I am going to have to evaluate any solution(s) and was just hoping to reduce the number of evaluations and or stay away from any PIG

RE: Desperate Newbie

2002-09-04 Thread James Liddil
Already tried that. Stop both the McAffee and Trend Micro. No effect. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Desperate Newbie You have AV software running on

RE: Desperate Newbie

2002-09-04 Thread Mellott, Bill
I cant say for your setup ..since I have not gone the upgrade way yet... but if it where my 55 on NT4.. I might...look at the taskmgr and see what process is consumming all the CPU. with regard to memory... 55 is designed to be a pig...and slim down on request. 2 cents bill -Original

RE: Desperate Newbie

2002-09-04 Thread Chris Scharff
Uninstall the one of them which is Exchange aware and make sure the other is not scannign the Exchange directories... Any change? -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

RE: Desperate Newbie

2002-09-04 Thread Couch, Nate
Agreed. If you have AV software it might be scanning your mailbox stores (especially considering the fact that you stopped and restarted the store.exe). You might see if it is setup on a schedule of some sort. What other processes are running and which ones are taking the most CPU time?

RE: Desperate Newbie

2002-09-04 Thread James Liddil
Turns out DiskKeeper got stuck on even though it is in auto mode. Or so it would seem at this stage. Jim -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Desperate Newbie I

RE: Full Text Indexing

2002-09-04 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
My impression has been that Exchange 2000 indexing searches within attachments -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full Text Indexing Err on

RE: OWA Problem in forntend/backend setup

2002-09-04 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
Perhaps custom configuration will need to be done on the HTTP Virtual Servers on the back-end that represent your front-ends. On theback-end, drill into Server/Protocols/HTTP You have Exchange Virtual Server [Front-end Server name] right? Go to the properties of the [Front-end Server

Shed some light on 501 5.5.2

2002-09-04 Thread Chris H
I got this error returned from a user: Subject: Mail delivery failure Sent . Received 501 5.5.2 there is a stray LF character in the message Could not deliver mail to this user. * End of message *** Looking in the KB and on Technet all I found was a reference to

RE: Comment on Notes and Exchange

2002-09-04 Thread David Weinstein
The Technology that Notes is built on has allowed it to be resilient and morph it self to an ever changing market conditions. It was declared dead at the start of the Internet revolution but with the help of IBM was able to quickly deliver a decent HTTP server in R4 and native SMTP transport

NT 2000 backup of Exchange.

2002-09-04 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Exchange 5.5 SP4 under NT 2000 SP2. Well we have our first 2000 server up running Exchange 5.5 SP3. I'm trying to get the backups to run similar to what I had with NT 4.0. With the 4.0 version I had the cmd set to initialize any tape in the drive, backup and eject and mail the logs for

RE: Shed some light on 501 5.5.2

2002-09-04 Thread Dale Geoffrey Edwards
Maybe look at Q269289 and Q184718. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Shed some light on 501 5.5.2 I got this error returned from a user: Subject: Mail delivery

RE: Win2K SP3 good to go?

2002-09-04 Thread Ali Wilkes (IT)
And done full backups? -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:02 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Win2K SP3 good to go? Subject: RE: Win2K SP3 good to go? Go for it apply Exchange SP3 as

RE: Haiku Friday

2002-09-04 Thread Ali Wilkes (IT)
what state? I have a greivance. My change of address hasn't gone through yet (two 1/2 weeks ago). -Original Message- From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:03 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Haiku

RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.

2002-09-04 Thread Tom Meunier
No, there's no must be a simple way about it. There's not. But here's a good article that solved this problem for me, and taught me a little bit about RSM and NTBACKUP and scripting, too: http://www.jsiinc.com/sube/tip2200/rh2265.htm -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete

RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.

2002-09-04 Thread Couch, Nate
From what I have been reading the Windows NT 2000 version of ntbackup.exe is not Exchange aware. I know they tell you to to use the Exchange 2000 version for MS Exchange 2000 Server. Admittedly, I don't recall anything about using it with MS Exchange 5.5. Nate Couch EDS Messaging --

RE: Full Text Indexing

2002-09-04 Thread Tom Meunier
You are correct. The following file types, up to 16mb in size by default, change-able with a reg hack: .doc, .xls, .ppt, .html, .htm, .asp, .txt, and .eml -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:40 AM Posted

OT: To Great Cthulhu Jones

2002-09-04 Thread Ray Beckwith
A humble question to the Great one. I am relatively new to the list (been monitoring and occasionally posting for about 2 years) and I have always wondered, what is the correct pronunciation of your name. I would hate to insult your greatness by mispronouncing it when paying homage.

RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.

2002-09-04 Thread Alverson, Tom
I just did an install of win2k server, then sp3 and any critical windowsupdates, then installed exchange 5.5 and then sp4 for exchange. I then (manually) used the built-in backup program of win2k to backup the exchange server. There is a separate exchange branch in the explorer interface that

RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones

2002-09-04 Thread Schwartz, Jim
You pronounce it the same way it is spelled. Kind of sounds like spitting out a watermelon seed. [1] [1] Begging forgiveness from Kimmie for stealing her line. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:14 PM To: Exchange

RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.

2002-09-04 Thread Tom Meunier
Whatever you're reading, you should be using to wrap fish or line birdcages. What's Windows NT 2000? -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:59 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: NT 2000 backup of

RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones

2002-09-04 Thread Ray Beckwith
Pardon me for the confusion, I meant the last name... Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: When a person can no longer laugh at himself, it is time for others to laugh at him. -- Thomas Szasz -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.

2002-09-04 Thread Woodruff, Michael
Do you mean the one after Windows 3.1 ME 2000 SE? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange. It's the version of windows before Windows NT

RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones

2002-09-04 Thread Aaron Brasslett
Oh, that is pronounced: 'jOnz That one stumps me on occasion as well. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones Pardon me for the confusion, I meant the

RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones

2002-09-04 Thread Dale Geoffrey Edwards
It's pronounced JONES, like cones, but with a J. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones Pardon me for the confusion, I meant the last

Re: Haiku Friday

2002-09-04 Thread Steven A. Christensen
lol - Kansas - Original Message - From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:42 Subject: RE: Haiku Friday what state? I have a greivance. My change of address hasn't gone through yet (two 1/2 weeks

RE: Haiku Friday

2002-09-04 Thread Martin Blackstone
As soon as the pony express gets there, they will send a telegram to take care of it. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Haiku Friday lol - Kansas - Original

RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.

2002-09-04 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Great. Gives me something to start with. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange. No, there's no must be a simple way about it. There's not.

Attn: FAY.COM admin

2002-09-04 Thread Tom Meunier
Not only is your content filter set to some ridiculous parameters, but you should ask your email admin to set up a [EMAIL PROTECTED] account. Do an [EMAIL PROTECTED] and a [EMAIL PROTECTED] while you're at it. Jeesh. Nice to get an email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] telling me there's no such user in

RE: Attn: FAY.COM admin

2002-09-04 Thread Christopher Hummert
Not only is your content filter set to some ridiculous parameters Agreed -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Attn: FAY.COM

RE: OWA2K logout.asp generates event 36

2002-09-04 Thread Jon Hill
MSFT came back with a solution. In ISM on each node, I went to the properties of Exchange Virtual Server | Exchweb | bin. In the Application Settings section of the Virtual Directory tab, I clicked on the Create button and hit OK. When both nodes were done, I went to cluster admin and cycled

RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.

2002-09-04 Thread Ken Cornetet
I just posted this a couple of days ago, but here it is again. It labels whatever tape is in the drive and does a backup to it. Use the GUI to create the backup selection file everything.bks. Obviously, you want this file to include your Exchange information stores. Change the BNCHMARK DLT1

RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones

2002-09-04 Thread Lentz, Wayne
..And I always pronounced it as hoe-neez. Like cahones without the ca. Must I wait for direct order before whipping myself with frayed cat5 cabling, or do I start now? -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:35 PM

RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.

2002-09-04 Thread Couch, Nate
Wilco. -- From: Tom Meunier Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2002 12:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange. Whatever you're reading, you should be using to wrap fish or line birdcages.

RE: backup failure

2002-09-04 Thread Hanna, Keith
Very polite, you don't see that much round these parts. :) -Original Message- From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 September 2002 13:59 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: backup failure Pauli: This is the second post you've made today with

RE: Haiku Friday

2002-09-04 Thread Chris Scharff
You can throw a rock from where the pony express starts and hit Kansas. Tie the telegram to it. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday As soon as the

Re: Haiku Friday

2002-09-04 Thread Martin Tuip
Hotmail? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Steven A. Christensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exchange 5.5 OWA E2K OWA

2002-09-04 Thread Pennell, Ronald B.
I'am about ready to disconnect my last/first exchange 5.5 server in my 5.5 site. Reason of servers are running Ex2000. I know that my OWA 5.5 server will connect to my Ex2000 mailbox at the present time. But, what will happen when I shutdown the last 5.5 server. Will my 5.5 OWA still be able

RE: Full Text Indexing

2002-09-04 Thread Ryan Malayter
Do you have to do something besides install the Adobe PDF Ifilter to add PDF files to that list? -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:01 PM Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: Full Text Indexing Subject: RE: Full

RE: Attn: FAY.COM admin

2002-09-04 Thread Ryan Malayter
Actually, it doesn't seem that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not one of the standard mailbox names recommended by RFC-2142. Hostmaster, Webmaster, and a few others should be considered before that. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September

securing OWA

2002-09-04 Thread Rob Ellis
I have an Exchange 2000 SP2 box, fresh install onto Win2k SP2. The M drive doesn't show in explorer, etc, as expected after SP2. However, I have installed an SSL certificate on IIS, and I want to turn on the secure channel required option for the Exchange VD, but I can't, because when I select

Re: Haiku Friday

2002-09-04 Thread Steven A. Christensen
I don't get much SPAM at the work address. - Original Message - From: Martin Tuip [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 13:29 Subject: Re: Haiku Friday Hotmail? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange

RE: Exchange 5.5 OWA E2K OWA

2002-09-04 Thread EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
Not exactly sure of your setup. But in general terms 5.5 OWA works OK with E2K. E2K OWA however does not work with Exchange 5.5 boxes. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: Securing OWA

2002-09-04 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
I guess it is better to run OWA on thin air -Original Message- From: Jason Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing OWA IIS Lockdown is a utility from Microsoft that will (based on what you choose) make an

RE: securing OWA

2002-09-04 Thread EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
There is a Q article on MS site that tells exactly how to setup. Also if it is a SSL from Verisign or some other vendor, they should have sent the step by steps along with the SSL. I have used Verisign in the past with excellent results. just follow their steps and related Q article and you will

RE: Securing OWA

2002-09-04 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
You can generate your own digital certificates but no one will automatically trust them. Everyone trusts SSL certificates from Verisign. -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 12:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing

RE: securing OWA

2002-09-04 Thread Kevin Miller
Reboot then it will come back.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rob Ellis Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: securing OWA

RE: Diskkeeper and Exchange- My experience

2002-09-04 Thread Dale Geoffrey Edwards
If you can look in your Event Viewer and see that the online defrag Exchange does overnight will give you back 20-30GB of space, go for it. Run the eseutil /d utility. But if you are only seeing MBs of space you would regain, forget about it. It's not worth the time nor is it worth the

RE: Diskkeeper and Exchange- My experience

2002-09-04 Thread EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
Well I once told Wal-Mart's (Exchange 5.5) Senior Exchange man that defrag wasn't really necessary unless there where performance issues or temp. disk space issues. Well he said that MS says run it so that's what they do. I was interviewing for the job and he said anyone who doesn't run Defrag on

RE: Diskkeeper and Exchange- My experience

2002-09-04 Thread Chris Scharff
Exchange offline defrags are rarely if ever necessary. Is there a compelling reason to have diskkeeper within 100 miles of the server? -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: Diskkeeper and Exchange- My experience

2002-09-04 Thread James Liddil
Well if this server was only for exchange I'd say no. But the reality is that this server is also used as file server. Jim Liddil -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

RE: Comment on Notes and Exchange

2002-09-04 Thread Dupler, Craig
I guess you bought the spin. What I said was correct. R1 did not do anything to which a gateway could be attached. Mary McCarthy gave lots of pitches wherein LMS was clearly described as a combination message store and MTA common to both Notes and cc:Mail, and it did not get built because the

RE: Diskkeeper and Exchange- My experience

2002-09-04 Thread Dale Geoffrey Edwards
And that is a BIG NO NO! Exchange Server should not be used for a file server. Microsoft will tell you nothing but Exchange should be on the Server. Except maybe AV software for Exchange. Geoff... -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,

RE: Diskkeeper and Exchange- My experience

2002-09-04 Thread Chris Scharff
And 4 years ago Microsoft told you running Exchange aware AV on your boxes was a big no no. Ideal configurations and reality often have little correlation. (Says he who just installed AD and E2K on a laptop) -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Diskkeeper and Exchange- My experience

2002-09-04 Thread Dillon, Jeff
You left space for Serious Sam, I hope -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 5:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Diskkeeper and Exchange- My experience And 4 years ago Microsoft told you running Exchange

ADC errors Event ID 8294

2002-09-04 Thread Ken Cornetet
Anyone seen this ADC error before? Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSADC Event Category: Replication Event ID: 8294 Date: 8/23/2002 Time: 9:49:24 AM User: N/A Computer: NTS336 Description: The homeMTA attribute is not present on the import

RE: Messages sent to bogus domains like aol

2002-09-04 Thread Great Cthulhu Jones
Read them and see if any are usable for blackmailing. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 6:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Messages sent to bogus domains like aol Any

RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones

2002-09-04 Thread Great Cthulhu Jones
You can always initiate a self-punishment session at any time. And, yes, it's pronounced the way it's spelled. It sounds like a universe being sucked backwards through a flexi-straw into a tailpipe somehow capable of saying Jones at the end, with a slight Welsh accent. (:= -Original

RE: backup failure

2002-09-04 Thread Great Cthulhu Jones
Yep. Or, to be precise, when you see me, you'll be in hell. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leo Ballester Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: backup failure I will see you in HELL :-)

RE: Diskkeeper and Exchange- My experience

2002-09-04 Thread Great Cthulhu Jones
Indeed. Those databases will always grow, eventually colliding with the home directories. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

SMTP Service Dependencies

2002-09-04 Thread Chris H
This is SMTP Service in IIS in Windows 2000 Server . . . Everything was running fine and I decided to move on and harden my server as described in the O'Reily book about building Windows 2000 Bastion Hosts. I went through and disabled all un-needed services as prescribed and rebooted. The SMTP

Disappearing SMTP in IIS MMC

2002-09-04 Thread Chris H
AR Dang Hardening an IIS server book . .. You must have File and Printer Sharing on for the SMTP or NNTP modules to appear in the IIS MMC console and function properly. Thanks for any help that may have been under way!! Chris