Set the 'expiry time' parameter on the Email?
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Fay, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 November 2002 18:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: EDU Migration Question
I'm
You can move servers between admin groups?
So switching to Native mode will allow me to move users between admin
groups? Is that what I was missing?
Uso
- Original Message -
From: Greg Deckler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002
Make a mailbox on your system for one of the managers. It will be in
the GAL, of course. Now set forwarding on that mailbox to the guy(s) in
Dubai.
Better: Tell your moron users to add them in their own contacts list.
Best: Get the two morons in Dubai to have two mailboxes.
Unthinkably
We're using current backups performed on 2000 SP3. Both systems running the
same which has really got me puzzled why it will not read on the recovery
box.
-Original Message-
From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 5:48 PM
To: Exchange
You need to be in Native mode to move servers between Admin/Groups in E2K.
Moving users does not matter.
- Original Message -
From: Uso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 3:41 AM
Subject: Re: How to move two XCH 5.5 sites to one
To summarize my problem, my E2K mailbox server is stripping SMTP Received:
headers, and making up it's own. Last week when this happened, a reboot
cleared up the problem, but it came back (not been able to reboot again,
yet).
Ed, is this proof enough?
I've managed to distill the problem down to
I recall reporting this and escalating it when I still worked there. Was
told it's by design when SMTP mail is transferred within an organization.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
We have four domains with a complete-trust model. Mailboxes have NT accounts
from any of these domains. No problems here...never had any issues sharing
calendars. This is exchange 5.5.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 November 2002 18:22
To:
What type of server is the advanced server (ie pdc/ member)? SBS is a
pdc so if you've set up the new server as that also, I don't think it's
possible.
You could put the 2 servers on different network segments and exmerge -
or exmerge and copy to backup tape.
You can use the csvde or ldifde to
Anyone have a ballpark price for Tech-Ed 2003? I'm a Tech-Ed virgin and
it's budget time. Thanks in advance, Scott.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
But it happens with external mail as well.
Our test systems have never shown this symptom.
Our production E2K system never started doing this until last week (we can't
think of anything that's changed on any of the Exchange servers). It's been
running for a couple of months now.
Like I've
Paul,
I just tested this, it strikes through the Sender and Subject and inserts
Message Expired into the body, but it does not delete the message?
I sent a single test message to myself and to another user. I did not read
either message, set it to expire in 30 minutes. Message to myself
Hi,
Can anyone advice what is the best way to replace exchange 5.5 on NT 4.o
hardware? we already have new server in place, which has Windows 2000
server. One way I know is shutdown the exchange 5.5 now, and name window
2000 server the same name as exchange 5.5, join the the existing site?? (
The bible on Exch moves
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm
-Original Message-
From: frank123 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 11:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: replace exchange 5.5 hardware
Hi,
Can anyone advice what is the best way to
Just a wag and I didn't read the entire thread. Is the received: from
header intermittently stripped if the rdns fails? Have you tried doing this
manually via telnet to the ims and issuing a helo fqdn?
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
Environment: 1-E2k/SP3 on Win2k/SP3; 9-Exch. 5.5/SP4 on Win2k/SP3 Servers
spread out around the USA. I just decommissioned a 5.5 Server, replicated
it out of the 5.5 and E2k environment. I deleted the CAs in the ADC, but I
cannot delete the ADC itself? It have also deleted the Exchange 5.5
I am making my way through Exchange Server 2000 24X7 an my question is
basic. I now gather that the store is the total of both the stm and edb
files. And as such if this total exceeds 16 gigs then we will be SOL (we
don't have the enterprise edition)? Correct.
Jim Liddil
I know this question/problem has been discussed a bit but here goes. First
put all the legal/regulatory issues aside. Is there really a problem with
viewing Exchange as one large message/file storage system? If keeping it
simple for users is what it is about then let them simple keep all the
Thanks Chris for your help.
Just for the record, and posterity in the archives, should anyone else have
a problem running the little Exchng32.exe on W2000 or XP, there is a version
of WMS.exe which looks like it was designed to allow MS Mail migration to
Novell GroupWise called NTWMS.exe. I found
IIRC, Add/remove programs, if it's not there then look in the active
directory sites and services. Server, services, ADC server name, delete
key.
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Is there an issue with it? No, not really. I don't see it as a good use of
resources, however.
Exchange 2k Enterprise costs roughly what, 4-5 times the cost of just
Windows 2000 server? So cost is an issue.
The format conversions that happen in Outlook, while lessened in E2k, aren't
completely
You're not SOL in that you can reduce the amount of content, run ESEUTIL
/D and restart the store.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
I have deleted all the Exchange Settings in site and services for this site.
The only server that shows up under sites and services is the DC for that
site. And there are no settings for that. The ADC for the site still shows
up under the ADC Services, but it has no CAs. I need to delete the
Cost is a non-issue if you've already bought the Exchange 2000 Advanced
Server license.
I don't think Exchange is a good file system or a good document
management system. It has its own benefits and drawbacks. A key
drawback to your vision is that Exchange is still relatively difficult
to
Hi All
Time ago I read some information about deadlines on supporting Exchange5.5
and WindowsNT4.
Does anybody know when those product are going to be discontinued for
sale/support?
Rgds,
-er
_
List posting FAQ:
Just to clarify we don't have Advance Server. And this is not my vision it
is the view that a number of management folks as well as most end users have.
What I am trying to do is explain why this is not the best idea without them
just thinking I am being the IT Gestapo.
Jim
-Original
Your mistake was deleting the last Exchange 5.5 server using Sites and
Services. You should have used the old Exchange 5.5 Administrator.
(This process isn't exactly intuitive, I'll admit.)
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked
It's up there on Microsoft's web site. Go look.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Microsoft
Exchange List Server
Sent:
You'd better have Enterprise (not Advanced--my mistake) if you plan to
implement this vision! Sixteen gigabytes isn't much room.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I did remove the 5.5 Server through the 5.5 Administrator. (It is not our
last 5.5 server -- there are still eight (8) 5.5 Servers in this
environment.) I removed the CAs from the ADC and the went to site and
services and deleted the ADC under Exchange Settings.
Gèoff...
-Original
The last in the site is what matters. And I sure looks like in your
first post you said you deleted it using AD Sites and Services, but the
grammar is unclear so you must have meant something else.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and
Here this page might be helpful:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/support/lifecycle/default.asp
Thanks,
chuck
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 11:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: deadlines for suportin
I deleted the ADC for the decommissioned Server in Sites and Services, which
should have removed it from the ADC Services. So what remains is a shell
for the ADC in ADC Services (not to be confused with ADC Sites and
Services).
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley
Did you remove the ADC software?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey
Edwards
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002
No. I still have 8 other ADC running and one empty ADC with no CAs that I
am now trying to remove from the ADC Services.
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC
Are you saying that you can use a Move User command and you don't have to be
in Exchange NATIVE mode for it to work between Admin Groups? Or are you
saying that you can move the users with EXMERGE (or some other tool)?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
It depends. I would look at MS's site. Sounds like if your moving from one
org to another that Exmerge may be the way to go. You might want to research
it a bit more to see if it fits your scenario.
- Original Message -
From: Bare, Ronald A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions
Ed:
I did not understand what you were saying when I first read your
post. However, I did finally realize what you were trying to say. I
appreciate your help.
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 1:24
How about if they are in the same Org? Can you use move user or do you have
to use EXMERGE? Do you know if there are any circumstances when move user
will work between Admin Groups when you are not in NATIVE Exchange mode?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
We are running Exchange5.5 with Arcserve2000. Have one try this before.
I want to install a new 9.1GB drive and then restore the priv.edb on to the
new drive.
I would run eseutil.exe and Isinteg.exe for the priv.edb on the new drive.
Have anyone try this?
Thank
-Original Message-
From:
IIRC, you will need 110% of free disk space of the size of your priv.edb,
e.g., Priv=50GB, you would need 55GB.
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ESE97
We are
From what it sounds like you need to run Istinteg based on your errors. I
would read the Disaster Recovery paper for 5.5 and make sure before
proceeding.
- Original Message -
From: Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002
Did that fix your problem?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey
Edwards
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 12:33
If the organization is in native mode, you can move mailboxes between
servers in different administrative groups.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
We are adding an exchange 2000 server to an existing site. Currently we have two
remote servers running exchange 2k sp2 already and the new server will be in a remote
office.
After installing exchange 2000, the server reboots fine and comes up properly. But
once I install SP2 on it, the IS
Correction on first email.. it wasn't the SA, it was the MTA.
Reinstalled the server again and this time I tried SP1 first and everything worked
fine. Installed SP2 and MTA and IS would not come up. Same event errors except now I
see a an event 8213.
Event Type: Error
Event Source:
Thank you.
I presume then that if the Organization is NOT in native mode, you CANNOT
move mailboxes between servers in different administrative groups. You then
need to use EXMERGE or some other tool like it. Is that correct? This is
what I thought, but wasn't sure.
-Original Message-
I've been trying to follow along; maybe this isn't the same thing I was
referring to.
Help me out here: when mail from outside (like this one) hits your org, what
path does it follow?
- Original Message -
From: Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1. Install Exchange on the new box.
2. Join the existing site
3. Move the mailboxes
4. Follow the KB article on removing the first server in a site
5. Leave the old box up for a week (until you are sure that every user has
logged in at least once).
6. Decommission the old box.
- Original
That is correct. I'd try to get to native mode first so you can move
mailboxes if at all possible.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Hi Jim:
I hope that the book has not been too tedious for you. :-)
The 16GB limit is imposed on Exchange 2000 Server (unofficially
known as standard edition.) If the sum total of the EDB file and the
STM file exceeds 16GB, then the store dismounts. So, basically, you are
51 matches
Mail list logo
