PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-21-4318300
mobile: +353-87-2506527
web: www.zenith.ie
WAP: www.zenith.ie/wap
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key http://www.zenith.ie/tomraftery.asc
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 September 2001 16:16
To: Exchange Discussions
-2506527
web: www.zenith.ie
WAP: www.zenith.ie/wap
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key http://www.zenith.ie/tomraftery.asc
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 September 2001 16:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: can't mail to Public
/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
phone: +353-21-4318300
mobile: +353-87-2506527
web: www.zenith.ie
WAP: www.zenith.ie/wap
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key http://www.zenith.ie/tomraftery.asc
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 September 2001 13:32
To: Exchange
]]
Sent: 07 September 2001 13:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2k public folders sending out 3 mails to mail lists
side note: rather than giving your users Send As perms to
the PFs, why
not sub them to the lists with the No Mail option. They
can still read
the mail in the PF
).
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday 19 November 2001 00:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT - Latin Lesson
If alias was a Latin word the plural would not be alii.
While alias has a
Latin derivation it is not a latin
Wait a minute. I don't have an Exchange server I can
test with at the moment so someone please correct me
if I'm wrong but, from what I remember, using an
alternate recipient has a very, very low probability
of creating a mail loop. And it does not require that
you uncheck Do not allow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
this is probably very basic but I have looked through the faq and
read mails and am a bit stumped. The situation is as follows:
A client has approached me to resolve an issue where two Exchange
servers in separate locations are no longer
PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 November 2001 12:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Connected Exchange servers have stopped connecting!
What is the schedule for the RAS connection set for?
- Original Message -
From: exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED
What is the latest Trend Pattern?
-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 7:10 PM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: New Virus outbreak
Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak
We are here, and EXE, and PIF, and VBS and so
Don't you guys run a Intrusion Detection Package like snort or
something?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:17 PM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: New Virus outbreak
Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak
Probably
]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeff...
I am intimately familiar with this issue and most of its mutations. I am
an Exchange / AD consultant and just completed a migration to E2K of
22,000 mailboxes where 3 mail systems all shared the same SMTP domain
name. It took a little work, but routing is efficient and works like a
charm
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:59 AM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Clustering Exchange
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange
What is the real cost of planned downtime? Does it
really cost your company anything at all? (Some have
suggested that productivity might
Yes. Delete one of your 2 virtual servers.
-Original Message-
From: K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Sunday, January 27, 2002 4:10 PM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: E2K and clustering
Subject: E2K and clustering
If you have an active/active E2K cluster, is there a way
: naveen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Saturday, February 02, 2002 6:02 PM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: IS Offline defrag- Mystery
Subject: IS Offline defrag- Mystery
Hi,
After cleanning up 2 GB of mails from a database of 7.7 GB(through
Outlook 2000)and defrag the IS-PRIV offline ,we
on clients request). So...
-Per
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Sunday, February 03, 2002 1:14 PM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: IS Offline defrag- Mystery
Subject: Re: IS Offline defrag- Mystery
Uh offline compaction does just fine
).
-Per
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Sunday, February 03, 2002 4:14 PM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: IS Offline defrag- Mystery
Subject: Re: IS Offline defrag- Mystery
Letting online defrag run also allowed the system to run other
To: Exchange
Conversation: Ex2000 GAL (LastName, FirstName)
Subject: Ex2000 GAL (LastName, FirstName)
Hi
How can we modify the AD so the Exchange GAL appear as LastName,
FirstName
when clicking in To in OL 2000 ?
JF
_
List posting FAQ
Egleston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:52 AM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Ex2000 GAL (LastName, FirstName)
Subject: RE: Ex2000 GAL (LastName, FirstName)
OK, I just did this
Do I need to replicate my AD or force RUS to update?
Or will this just apply to new
, March 13, 2002 10:17 AM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: E2k Clustering
Subject: RE: E2k Clustering
I get to use both of my servers that I purchased. Cause of our budget
is so tight and I have get buy. It took me a year to get the following
equipment.
Don't you think active/active is right
, and of course never
hyped the bad part once problems arose.
On top of that: what Missy said.
-Per
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 10:51 AM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: E2k Clustering
Subject: Re: E2k Clustering
Sheesh
For any domain in which no Exchange 2000 servers will exist, you need to
manually create a Recipient Update Service under Recipients- Recipient
Update Service in ESM.
-Per
-Original Message-
From: Alexey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, March 28, 2002 7:44 AM
Posted
I still bet that it's the destination server not supporting 8bitmime.
You can turn off this ESMTP verb on Exchange, Q257569. This Q article
shows how to do it for Exchange 2000 version of SMTP, not the base
Windows 2000. I did not read the Q you referenced, but I know the one I
listed above works
No, domainprep.
Run Exchange 2000 setup from command line adding /domainprep after the
path to setup.exe.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:22 AM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Second Domain
Subject: Re: Second
8bitmime, 8bitmime, 8bitmime, 8bitmime, 8bitmime, 8bitmime...like Tony
said: disable 8bitmime.
-Original Message-
From: Frost, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, May 27, 2002 11:08 AM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: SMTP error 554 with relay
Subject: SMTP error 554
Try the legacyExchnageDN.
-Original Message-
From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:41 PM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue.
Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue.
Recently we began our Exchange 5.5
Typing is bad today: legacyExchangeDN
-Original Message-
From: Exchange
Posted At: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:27 PM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue.
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue.
Try the legacyExchnageDN.
-Original Message
Hi All,
Is there any caveats that I should know of in regards to upgrading to
Exchange Sp2 or SP3 and Veritas Backup Exec 8.5? I know that I should
backup the database before and after the upgrade. Did anyone run into a
problem backing the database using Backup Exec 8.5 with the Exchange 8.5
Hi All,
Can somebody explain to me how the three interact. I have been reading up
on some postings and would like some clarification as to how they are
interrelated.
We have 2 Domain Controllers(DCs), A and B and Exchange as a member
server. A is setup as the Global Catalog. We added a third
I currently have Windows 2k with Exchange 5.5 sp4.
I have a user that uses various public folders to receive emails to
different addresses. In each public folder there is a script that fires
every time that a message arrives in that public folder (obviously using the
Exchange Event Service). Each
Chris,
I really hope the pope can assist me in exchange but reality, is not..
i have not try other server ...any other solutions beside this??
Thanks!
Ken L
Subject: Re: Could not install Exchange using /forestprep
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 21:58:45
Please, please read this message before sending me to a URL that I've
already visited.
I'm having a problem with Outlook 2002 users. When Send/Receive runs, The
following error appears:
Task 'Microsoft Exchange Server' reported error (0x8004010F); 'The operation
failed. An object could
/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
Perhaps, but unless I'm totally missing something, it doesn't answer my
question. :)
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, January 12, 2004 10:28
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Mailbox Manager Report Customization
Subject: RE
She can't use OWA because she is on a different network behind a firewall.
Webmail is the only solution for her to access her email.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Webmail
So
Let me try ...
-Original Message-
From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ASCII messages
I just sent a reply to the list stating that maybe the internet.com people
had got their act together because
Is this the first E2K server in the org that you are removing/reinstalling?
If it is, use ADSIedit or the likes, and remove the Exchange org from the
Active Directory. Then re-install Exchange.
Louise
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday
: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you.
I do have my SAN layout for 2 SGs (I have a volume reserved for 2nd set of
transaction logs). I admit, I preferred a single SG
Thanks again,
Louise
-Original Message-
From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 12:12 PM
To: Exchange
://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, so perhaps I should add a little more information here.
Believe me, I KNOW .pst files are bad. And, in light of what follows, I have
already started looking for another job.
We are currently merging two companies. My IT director wants ALL remote
Exchange servers removed from ALL offices
F
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Test
Test
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
No, it was added after but I'm not sure that W002 was the first either. I
just know that it was there before W001 and it is the oldest server in the
site.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 September 2001 18:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Please, walk us through how you are OPENING the form that does not have the
changes.
---Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Form not updating.
Have you confirmed
???
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've ran across this problem quite a few times while working at a large car company
(not to be named). This was happening a couple times a week there and we used the
Exchange 5.0 client to rename the inbox. Log into the users mailbox with the client
and you should have no problem renaming
I need to replicate two Exchange 5.5 SP4 servers in the same site through a
firewall. Checkpoint FW-1 to be precise.
I have read the archives and MSKB but cannot get it to work. Do I have to
specify the TCP/IP port for RPC traffic or does it use 102 the same as the
MTA?
Is anyone doing
Version 4.1
I tried adding the pre-defined services but with no joy. Works if I give it
an any rule! ;
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 October 2001 14:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 5.5 Directory Replication through a firewall
What
,
Louise
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Installing Exchange 2K Problem
Yes we do.
Thanks,
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Open 5.5 admin. Drill down to sitename\configuration\servername\private
information store\mailbox resources
Then click on View\Columns.
Add Deleted Items K.
Louise
-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 9:46 AM
To: Exchange
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A Public Folder Affinity?
-Original Message-
From: fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder Replication
Greetings,
I was wondering if anyone might have a suggestion on a reoccurring issue I
have. My users
A shot in the dark, but maybe DNS registration?
-Original Message-
From: Sven Moreels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 1:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IP address conflict
On a multihomed system, is it possible to set on which IP the exchange
server
Run rpings on the 2 servers to attempt to isolate your problem. It can be
found on the 5.5 cd under support\rpcpings.
Just a suggestion, if you have multiple nics, confirm their binding order.
I had the same error when I installed Exchange 2000 servers - some could not
communicate w/some 5.5
3 remote quasi-exchange administrators (interpretation: if the server
burps we're called)
1 jr. admin
1 mid-level engineer
1 manager/sr engineer/architect
1 open headcount frozen for 13 months
2 exchange organizations (1 legacy, the other in migration to E2K)
10,000 mailboxes
21 exchange
You can manage it from a machine where you loaded System Manager. You'll
find ADUC on this machine under Start\Programs\Microsoft Exchange.
Open ADUC and click on View/Advance Features (like Simon said (??)). Now
you'll have the page you need on user properties.
-Original Message
instead of tape restore. Then, the defrag effort
would not have been in vain.
Louise
-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
He followed the KB article, whatever
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You only see the MSMail and CCMail connectors in your site because these
options were not unchecked when installing an (or any) exchange server in
your site - that is also why you have that Schedule+ free/busy connector
only in your site. It won't hurt anything to just leave them
Have you looked at Q270160?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 9:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Free/Busy Schedule not working
Yes, I checked on the other servers and we are on their replica tab
Message-
From: PATRICK, MARTIN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA In E2K 5.5 Mixed Setup
The mailboxes are not on the OWA 5.5 server. During the migration, some
mailboxes will be on separate 5.5 servers and some on E2K
Just a note that Outlook 2002 clients who check another user's free/busy
will cause event 1016 to be written to the application log, as well.
Louise
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
That hasn't been my experience.
Did you confirm that when just checking a person's availability? If so, my
apologies for that misleading tidbit...
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 3:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 3:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Policing the Police
Any access to any mailbox that is not your primary mailbox will be logged
in the event viewer no matter how it is accessed and no matter what
What is the Exchange version and sp level?
Louise
-Original Message-
From: Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2001 6:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox doesn't mount after Restore
I backed up the Exchange Information Store using MS Backup in order
Fred:
Comments in-line:
-Original Message-
From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 12:53 p.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forward to an external pop account
OK,
I did the following and it didn't work...:
1) created [EMAIL
I am upgrading our current e-mail system hardware, for many many different
reasons the new system has to have the same system name as the old system.
This is usually not a problem, I just do it as a Disaster Recovery and
restore exchange to the new H/W, however I am trying to through my own
Is there a Macintosh exchange client out there that supports the features of
Exchange 5.5/2000? Or some kind of add on for Microsoft Entourage that
allows Mac users to take advantage of the exchange server features?
--
Dustin Krysak
Hi there - I'm about to move our office, and was wondering if anyone had any
foresight into possible problems (besides DNS) with our exchange server due
to a move...
The server is behind a NAT device, and the internal ip of the server will
remain the same - only the external ip (obviously
The domain is actually the same domain
And as for the inbound connections... Under where?
--
Dustin Krysak
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 21, 2002 12:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: *Moving offices - exchange
Entourage does? How so? I have never noticed any kind of exchange
connection option Or do you mean through IMAP or POP? And if there is
some kind of connector for exchange in entourage, do you know if the version
that recently came out for OS X is also compatible? I was looking on the MS
site
By features - I meant things like public folders, the GAL, etc. And to
connect VIA exchange (like the win outlook) as opposed to IMAP and POP3.
--
Dustin Krysak
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 21, 2002 5:08 PM
To: Exchange
It does, but I am looking for a OS X native app as well
--
Dustin Krysak
-Original Message-
From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 22, 2002 9:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: *Macintosh exchange client*
I thought the latest version
Check out Q159485.
Regards,
Louise
-Original Message-
From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Directory Sync Problems on setup.
Listers,
I have a peculiar problem and I would like to share it with you
Does the account you are using have adequate permissions in the AD and E2K?
Louise
-Original Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: moving mailbox -- help
here is the specific error I get
: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That is correct!
--
Dustin Krysak
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: February 5, 2002 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Limit outgoing size by destination domain?
So...
Just to clarify...What you're asking is, Is there any
Tried that search and I received results that didn't apply
Still sorting.
--
Dustin
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: February 5, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Limit outgoing size by destination domain
Thanks!!
--
Dustin
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: February 5, 2002 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Limit outgoing size by destination domain?
Here it is...you owe me one.
~Jim
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No problem here either...
Gerald
-Original Message-
From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT - BlackBerry Enterprise Server
Has anyone installed the BES 2.1 Service Pack 2 for Exchange, and did
It states that it is using the information store default (which is 3 am
correct?)
--
Dustin
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: February 7, 2002 6:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Offline address book sync
One would be that offline
Nothing out of the ordinary. No errors.
--
Dustin
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: February 8, 2002 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Offline address book sync
Check the event log,
Associated events
Around 3 a.m.
Ed Crowley
This is driving me insane.
Maybe I'm checking in the wrong spot... Where can you check the schedule
for this?
Sorry for the elementary q's, but still learning this exchange thing...
Thanks!
--
Dustin
One would be that offline address book generation is not scheduled to run.
Ed
Hi there... Upon further investigation and testing, I now get this error
after upgrading my client software to outlook 2002..
Task 'Microsoft Exchange Server' reported error (0x8004010F) : 'The
operation failed. An object could not be found.'
When looking this up on the MS site
(http
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: February 12, 2002 9:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Offline address book sync
Dustin,
In DS Site Configuration - Properties - Offline Address Book, do you have
any address books configured?
Jim
Hi there.. I have been searching for some instructions on how to setup a
exchange 5.5 server to host multiple domains. IS this possible with 1 IP, or
does exchange require a unique IP for each?
The only instructions I have found thus far are for exchange 2000.
I'm looking for a way to run
These instructions are for exchange 2000 would they also apply to V 5.5?
SUMMARY
This article describes how to configure an Exchange 2000 Server computer to
receive mail for multiple domains.
MORE INFORMATION
By default, you are not allowed to relay unsolicited commercial e-mail
Running Exchange 2000, a user deleted a folder in Public Folders. How
do you recover it using the Keep Deleted Items for x days option
Thanks
Saul
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
I found that the Q article is for Exchange 5.5. Will this also work for
Exchange 2000?
Thanks
Saul
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 7:35 PM
Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups
Conversation: Retention period in Public
Thanks!
Saul Gonzalez
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, February 21, 2002 10:19 AM
Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups
Conversation: Retention period in Public Folders
Subject: RE: Retention period in Public Folders
The Q article
, February 26, 2002 7:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange admin reporting a different mailbox size than Outlook cl
ient
Hi.
We are running Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4.0 SP6. If I look at the mailbox
resources of a particular user in the Exchange admin client, it shows me
that she has 22MB
). I
am also curious to hear what people are limiting it to.
--
Dustin
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: February 27, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Reasonable message size limits
Hello,
I have been required to raise the message
It's 1024(k) to 1 (mb) right?
And actually - is there a way to set the size limit globally, and then just
remove or modify the few that require it?
--
Dustin
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: February 27, 2002 12:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's a feature?
That's funny!
Saul
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:09 AM
Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups
Conversation: Webs
Subject: RE: Webs
It's a feature. In general it can be safely ignored.. Assuming your
I am doing a test restore. I did a restore on the exchange database to
another server. I restored successfully and I was able to mount the
Storage Group. The Production Server and the Test server are on the
same site, both using the same Domain Controller. Will I have to delete
an account
Yes, you are correct. I am using Exchange 2000. Thanks for your help.
I was trying to avoid that but seems like I have no choice. Thanks
again.
Saul Gonzalez
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 3:07 PM
Posted
1 - 100 of 591 matches
Mail list logo
