Exch 5.5 installation problem

2001-09-06 Thread Niki Blowfield
Hi We have a single Site/Server setup currently, and are looking to add some additional servers to the site, to be based at remote offices. Problem is, we cant get a successful installation. It always fails towards the end with the following message; some replication operations were not

RE: Exch 5.5 installation problem - solution?

2001-09-07 Thread Niki Blowfield
Thanks for the help and advice -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield Sent: 07 September 2001 08:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch 5.5 installation problem Hi We have Trend Server Protect and Scanmail. Stopped all services, and re-tried, but same error Thanks for the help

Disabling Mail Relay

2001-10-31 Thread Niki Blowfield
Dear All, We have started getting some low life relaying hundreds of 'questionable' mails thru our Exchange Server. I've set routing restrictions so that only authenticated users can route mail, and this stops it fine. However, we have 5 remote sites, 4 of which have local Exchange Servers

RE: Disabling Mail Relay

2001-11-01 Thread Niki Blowfield
requires authentication (I believe this is a checkbox in Outlook and Outlook Express). Serdar. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 6:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disabling Mail Relay Dear All, We have started

IMC Errors

2001-11-09 Thread Niki Blowfield
Dear All, We have been getting the following error messages in Event Viewer on our Exchange Server 5.5 SP3; Event ID 4128 Failure setting file attributes on file E:\exchsrvr\imcdata\in\WFBRQJQS. The error code returned was The system cannot find the file specified. . This is an unexpected

RE: Setup error : Check Knowledge Consistency

2001-11-26 Thread Niki Blowfield
bet that the VPN is causing the errors. Missy - Original Message - From: Niki Blowfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 11:37 AM Subject: Setup error : Check Knowledge Consistency Dear All, When attempting to add a server

Message disappeared during link outage

2002-01-16 Thread Niki Blowfield
Dear All, We have 5 offices connected via VPN provided by Sonicwall ADSL routers. Each office has an Exchange Server 5.5 SP3 on NT Server 4 SP6a, with 1 of them having an IMC. There is one Organisation/Site with multiple servers to represent the different offices, and all staff at each office

RE: Message disappeared during link outage

2002-01-17 Thread Niki Blowfield
outage Did you track the message or look in the tracking.logs? Use article Q173364 to decipher the event numbers. Regarding connectivity try Q220976. And you'll need this to: http://www.millerhats.com/899.jpg I always where mine in situations such as this. -Original Message- From: Niki

RE: Message disappeared during link outage

2002-01-17 Thread Niki Blowfield
+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message

Information Store fails to start

2002-02-28 Thread Niki Blowfield
Dear All, I have the following error on one of my Exchange 5.5 SP3 servers. Servers are configured to shut down in the evening just prior to an offline backup being carried out. When the batch file runs to restart them, the following error is noted in the Event Viewer, and the Information Store

RE: Public Folders

2002-02-28 Thread Niki Blowfield
Favorites is used for offline synchronisation of public folders too -Original Message- From: Williams Scott CTR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 February 2002 16:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders You can't remove the ALL Public Folders, this is the top level

RE: Information Store fails to start

2002-03-01 Thread Niki Blowfield
fails to start What account is the batch file using to restart the service? -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 5:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Information Store fails to start Dear All, I have the following

RE: Information Store fails to start

2002-03-01 Thread Niki Blowfield
offline backups is prior to a service pack in which case I do an online and offline just cuz it makes me feel good. In reality, you do not really need the Exchange Agent either. Veritas will let you still do a full online backup w/o it. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto

RE: Information Store fails to start

2002-03-01 Thread Niki Blowfield
, but it will still backup. What you won't get is the ability to do brick-level backups w/o the agent. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Information Store fails to start Just out of the box

RE: Information Store fails to start

2002-03-01 Thread Niki Blowfield
rather than simply backing up the entire store. Not very popular around these parts. ;) -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Information Store fails to start You assume correct, we're

Online backup of Exchange 5.5 with Veritas BE 8.5

2002-03-07 Thread Niki Blowfield
Dear All, I got some advice here earlier in the week with regards backing up Exchange with Veritas Backup Exec 8.5 without the Exchange Agent. I have altered our backup setup here by putting a DAT drive in the Exchange server (used to be across network, offline file copy backup to another

RE: Online backup of Exchange 5.5 with Veritas BE 8.5

2002-03-07 Thread Niki Blowfield
backup the whole database as you think of now, you will only be able to restore the whole thing at once. Mike -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. März 2002 10:13 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: Online backup of Exchange

RE: Online backup of Exchange 5.5 with Veritas BE 8.5

2002-03-07 Thread Niki Blowfield
]] Sent: 07 March 2002 12:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online backup of Exchange 5.5 with Veritas BE 8.5 Yes. And forget the mailbox stuff. Waste of time and tapes. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 7:46 AM

RE: Vauge OWA Error

2002-03-26 Thread Niki Blowfield
I've come a cropper before by entering the wrong Alias on the mailbox properties Check what this is for these mailboxes, and enter it as the mailbox name on the OWA login page -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 March 2002 16:25 To: Exchange

RE: Working Offline From Exchange Server

2002-03-27 Thread Niki Blowfield
? William -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 6:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Working Offline From Exchange Server Dear All, I have half a dozen or so laptop users, who mainly use their laptops in their respective offices

RE: Working Offline From Exchange Server

2002-03-27 Thread Niki Blowfield
Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 March 2002 09:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline From Exchange Server Hi I realised I have

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Niki Blowfield
The ECMSM worked great for me, luckily I have a lone Win2k VPN server set up for me and some Directors to connect up with our home ADSL accounts, and I can Dameware into the NT4 Exchange server to do some 'babysitting' although nothing was required. Set it and forget it indeed. I can have a lager

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Niki Blowfield
services before shutting down. IIS, SQL, Exch, etc. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware The ECMSM worked great for me, luckily I have a lone Win2k VPN

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Niki Blowfield
I have found that a 56k connection is ample for terminal services (pc anywhere/dameware/win2k) The frustration of watching the screen refresh is far outweighed by the benefits or being able to carry out these tasks remotely -Original Message- From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Securing Outlook

2002-05-17 Thread Niki Blowfield
Outlook -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 17:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing Outlook Sorry, I didn't make myself clear This machine is intended for anyone to walk onto to forward faxes, Zetafax sends

Klez in attached html

2002-05-21 Thread Niki Blowfield
I appreciate this is probably down to my misunderstanding of this virus, but we have one user who is being sent an html file As soon as the email is clicked on, the attachment is attempted to be opened by Outlook. Then Officescan flags up that there is a file in the users temp internet folder

RE: Klez in attached html

2002-05-21 Thread Niki Blowfield
Machine is Win2k SP2 with all critical and security updates applied, running IE6 with all patches/updates from windowsupdate.microsoft.com Mails coming thru exchange server with scanmail running latest Trend pattern file Desktop is also running Trend officescan with latest pattern file

RE: Klez in attached html

2002-05-21 Thread Niki Blowfield
-Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Klez in attached html I appreciate this is probably down to my misunderstanding of this virus, but we have one user who is being sent an html file As soon

Rules on client and server do not match

2002-05-23 Thread Niki Blowfield
Dear All, I have a user who is presented with the above message when attempting to access the rules wizard in Outlook 2000, not sure if that's worded correctly, but he basically gets asked if he wants to keep the client rules or the server rules. He doesn't know what rules he has on the server

RE: Rules on client and server do not match

2002-05-23 Thread Niki Blowfield
Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 11:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rules on client and server do not match Dear All, I have a user who is presented with the above message when attempting to access the rules wizard

RE: Rules on client and server do not match

2002-05-23 Thread Niki Blowfield
choice whether server or client, then hit OK to save your choice. If you have lost some rules in the process, import them back in from the saved .rwz in the previous step. I would typically expect you would select server for consistency's sake. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield

Troubleshooting Failed Delivery

2002-05-30 Thread Niki Blowfield
Dear All, Looking for a bit of advice here if poss please One of our clients sent an email to one of our surveyors regarding something that's apparently very important. Surveyor never received the email. Client claims he received a delivery notification A common problem for us is for people

RE: Troubleshooting Failed Delivery

2002-05-30 Thread Niki Blowfield
version of exchange are you using? Do the two parties concerned reside on the same network? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 May 2002 11:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject

RE: Troubleshooting Failed Delivery

2002-05-30 Thread Niki Blowfield
in tracking logs to see if exchange actually received it through the IMS connector? have you checked the tracking logs? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Troubleshooting Failed Delivery

2002-05-30 Thread Niki Blowfield
with e-mail. If the client really wanted to make sure the message was received, the proper procedure is to follow up by telephone, fax or yak. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 5:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject

Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus?

2003-06-30 Thread Niki Blowfield
on all servers Cant find any documentation on troubleshooting RPC Ping errors help ! Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832

Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus?

2003-06-30 Thread Niki Blowfield
is running on all servers Cant find any documentation on troubleshooting RPC Ping errors help ! Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760

RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus?

2003-07-01 Thread Niki Blowfield
then the full hostname? Thanks for any further advice Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: Andy

RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus?

2003-07-01 Thread Niki Blowfield
to the computer room and plug into the same switch as the two exchange servers Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message

RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus?

2003-07-01 Thread Niki Blowfield
servers, but same problem Have also tried installing exchange 5.5 onto a windows 2000 server, with exactly the same result At a total loss with this.any further advice? Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham

Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus?

2003-07-01 Thread Niki Blowfield
is running on all servers Cant find any documentation on troubleshooting RPC Ping errors help ! Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760

RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus?

2003-07-01 Thread Niki Blowfield
Hi LDAP seems fine, I can also install Exchange 5.5 no problems standalone on this machine DNS is provided by a unix box I'll try your specific LMHOSTS recommendations and let you know the outcome Thanks a lot for the help Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin

RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus?

2003-07-03 Thread Niki Blowfield
mappings (I think) Works a treat now, and after installation, putting all the DNS and WINS entries back in doesn't affect the servers communicating Thanks a lot for your time and advice Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road

.Deleted items reappearing

2003-08-04 Thread Niki Blowfield
We have one user who is experiencing numerous items she removed from her deleted items folder reappearing some weeks later PC is Win2k Pro running Office 2000, server is Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 Is happening roughly every month, anyone experienced this before? Nik

SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server

2003-12-11 Thread Niki Blowfield
Hi, Running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT4 Single server environment, server sits on private address behind Sonicwall ProVX firewall Firewall forwards all SMTP to this server which has the IMC, has worked fine for a number of years Mail has stopped reaching mailboxes, and doesnt

SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server

2003-12-11 Thread Niki Blowfield
Hi, Running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT4 Single server environment, server sits on private address behind Sonicwall ProVX firewall Firewall forwards all SMTP to this server which has the IMC, has worked fine for a number of years Mail has stopped reaching mailboxes, and

RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server

2003-12-11 Thread Niki Blowfield
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server Hi, Running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT4 Single server environment, server sits

RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server

2003-12-11 Thread Niki Blowfield
the firewall logs show? -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server Hi, Running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT4 Single server environment

RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server

2003-12-11 Thread Niki Blowfield
see the conversation between their mail server and your mail server (or your firewall). -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server They don't show errors

RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server

2003-12-11 Thread Niki Blowfield
Server It's not your Exchange server if your MX record points to your FW. I telnetted to your MX and the connection failed... -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP mail

RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server

2003-12-12 Thread Niki Blowfield
: IP address: 62.49.146.170 Host name: mailgate.partition.co.uk Alias: no-dns-yet.demon.co.uk Your DNS is outta whack -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP mail not reaching

Securing Outlook

2002-05-16 Thread Niki Blowfield : Exchange
Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name 24/7 This is because it runs Zetafax, which in standard form, needs to have a single person nominated for receiving all our faxes. This receptionist works until 3:00pm at which time the PC is left switched on

RE: Securing Outlook

2002-05-16 Thread Niki Blowfield : Exchange
]] Sent: 16 May 2002 17:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing Outlook er, lock the workstation? -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We

RE: Securing Outlook

2002-05-16 Thread Niki Blowfield : Exchange
client up and running? - Original Message - From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:06 PM Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name 24

RE: Securing Outlook

2002-05-16 Thread Niki Blowfield : Exchange
: Securing Outlook Based on the operational conditions, the desired objective cannot be achieved. Since security is not a concern for the machine or network as a whole, one portion thereof cannot be protected. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Sending to recipients in a public folder

2002-09-11 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Dear All, We use public folders for enterprise wide address books However, when someone wants to send an email to someone contained in one of these public folders, they have to go into it, right click the contact, and select new message I have been asked if it is possible to have these public

RE: Sending to recipients in a public folder

2002-09-11 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
as an email address book box. When they compose a new message and click To... they'll be able to select the public folder as an address book from the drop-down list. Neil -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 11 September 2002 09:56 Posted

RE: Backup Hardware

2002-09-13 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Reminds me of a call I got from an engineer from site once, he was installing some software into one of our old clone machines I'd sent to site, and was groaning because it was ...that old system, NT4. I think its got a virus because the system idle process is hogging all the CPU once I'd stopped

Advice on infrastructure design

2002-10-10 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Dear All, I hope you will excuse me if this seems like an amateurish question to ask, but I think we need to revise our setup, and are not in a position to hire a consultant. Currently, we have 5 offices connected to each other via ADSL links, using Sonicwall routers and their VPN capabilities.

RE: Advice on infrastructure design

2002-10-10 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
connector, but I find x.400 easier to use for connector purposes. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield

RE: Advice on infrastructure design

2002-10-15 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE

RE: Advice on infrastructure design

2002-10-16 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design Would you suggest all users connect with outlook in 'Exchange Mode' as opposed to POP3 retrieval? Our ADSL is capped at 256k

RE: webpopup

2002-10-16 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
I've had these on all my Win2k and XP machines at home Its titled WEBPOPUP but is actually the messenger service dialog, as if a net send command was received -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 15:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: Advice on infrastructure design

2002-10-16 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
on infrastructure design Niki, If they're large, you're right it'll take ages. However, why not just EXMerge them to .PSTs on each of the servers, copy onto CDs and carry or post. Regards, Mike Scott EPS Ltd -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16

EXMerge

2002-10-24 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Is Exmerge for 5.5 downloadable from anywhere? Or only from the Reskit (which we don't have) Thanks Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:

RE: EXMerge

2002-10-24 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Ok, I've found it on ftppss.microsoft.com -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange Sent: 24 October 2002 10:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EXMerge Is Exmerge for 5.5 downloadable from anywhere? Or only from the Reskit (which we don't have) Thanks Nik

Mailbox 'disappeared'

2002-10-24 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Dear All, We have an Exchange installation of a few servers, seperated by ADSL We are currently reviewing the setup to move everyone to a central server, and have everyone working offline One server does not communicate with the central server at all at the moment, and I havent been able to

RE: Mailbox 'disappeared'

2002-10-24 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange Sent: 24 October 2002 11:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox 'disappeared' Dear All, We have an Exchange installation of a few servers, seperated by ADSL We are currently reviewing the setup to move everyone to a central server, and have everyone working

RE: Mailbox 'disappeared'

2002-10-24 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
check box at the top and select all inconsistencies at the bottom. Do NOT touch anything to do with the public folders. This should recreate the directory object for the mailbox listed in the information store. Jeff -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist

Working Offline

2002-11-01 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Am I right in thinking that if a user working in an offline environment creates a subfolder under their Inbox, that they need to be taught how to mark that folder to be synchronized? Theres no way of making all new folders, by default, included in synchronization Thanks

RE: Working Offline

2002-11-01 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
...also, we have lost the ability to 'open other users folder' Is this simply not workable with offline working? Or is there a workaround thanks -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange Sent: 01 November 2002 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Working Offline Am I

RE: Working Offline

2002-11-01 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
, because you are working *offline*. If they want to connect to other users' folders, they will have to work online. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist

RE: Working Offline

2002-11-04 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
-Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Working Offline Ok thanks, we have remote sites that used to have local exchange servers, and they worked online. We've

Outlook 2002 contacts

2002-11-05 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Dear All, We have several public folders used as address books User are complaining that they only get to see the name of the contact, and not the associated email address, or their company. (sounds like an MCP question) Is there a way of automatically changing the contacts to display the name

RE: Outlook 2002 contacts

2002-11-06 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Thanks for that info, Greg -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:greg;infonition.com] Sent: 05 November 2002 18:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook 2002 contacts If you are talking about looking at the public folder, switch to Address Card view OR use View |

Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-06 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
I was having a discussion with someone the other day and he mentioned this phrase in passing, that they used PST files when user mailboxes became full I didn't dwell on this as we were talking about something else, but can anyone suggest what he may have meant? We are now enforcing stricter

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-06 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
(for whatever reason) and I can't keep extending their mailbox sizes. So they move to PST. Be aware of the risks here! Make a periodic backup of that PST as hard drives are prone to failure. Sander -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk] Sent: 06

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-07 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
' I know several people who use autoarchiving to handle stuff they no longer use. Much better than keeping email from three and four years ago. Talk about packrats. You'd think the world was going to end if they had to actually delete email that old. Nate -Original Message- From: Niki

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-07 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
' I know several people who use autoarchiving to handle stuff they no longer use. Much better than keeping email from three and four years ago. Talk about packrats. You'd think the world was going to end if they had to actually delete email that old. Nate -Original Message- From: Niki

MTA Error after deleting server

2002-12-02 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
We have moved some users from a remote Exchange Server to our central server at head office, and deleted the server using Exchange Administrator However, I'm getting the following MTA errors in Event Viewer every 10 mins on the central server where the mailboxes are now located Event ID: 9318

RE: MTA Error after deleting server

2002-12-03 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 December 2002 00:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Error after deleting server http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=9318source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield - Exchange Sent

RE: OWA Authentication Problem

2003-01-06 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
No-one have any ideas? :( -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange Sent: 02 January 2003 14:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Authentication Problem Hello Have a frustrating problem that's greeted me back to work Running Exchange Server 5.5 on NT Server 4 with SP6a

Free Mailing List Software

2003-01-17 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Hello Can anyone recommend a good, free mailing list software package for MS Exchange Server 5.5 Thanks in advance Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:

RE: Free Mailing List Software

2003-01-17 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software What, you wanted to give away software that was free? On 1/17/03 8:26, Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Makes me wish I had time to continue developing this. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield

RE: Free Mailing List Software

2003-01-17 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
products for Exchange, none of them are particularly good IMHO, and none are free. Sorry. On 1/17/03 8:55, Niki Blowfield - Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Its not a commercial thing, just a group of people who have had enough of yahoogroups, and I wondered if it was possible to run

RE: Free Mailing List Software

2003-01-17 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
is what gets you 'free' lists right? On 1/17/03 9:08, Niki Blowfield - Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok thanks, guess we'll have to put up with the adverts and 'web beacons' -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January

Internet mail taking an obscure extra step?

2003-03-04 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Hi Been asked to look at this for someone Server is Exch 5.5 SP3 running on NT4 SP6a Upon examining logs routinely, it seems outbound internet mail is going via another IMS at another company The Edu.TW domain is nothing to do with us, and mail should go direct from ourdomain.co.uk to

RE: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step?

2003-03-04 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Chris, They're the event viewer application logs on the sending exchange server -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 March 2003 15:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step? Upon examining logs

RE: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step?

2003-03-04 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Niki Blowfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Test Message Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 15:34:40 - MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary

RE: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step?

2003-03-04 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 March 2003 15:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step? What do the event logs say? On 3/4/03 9:38, Niki Blowfield - Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris, They're the event viewer application logs on the sending

RE: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step?

2003-03-04 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
only, DNS servers for internet access are at our ISP thanks -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange Sent: 04 March 2003 15:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step? Roger Sorry about that, just sent another email and generated

RE: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step?

2003-03-04 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
correctly configured relay restrictions) Michel -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step? I think I'm on to something

RE: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step?

2003-03-04 Thread Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield - Exchange Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 8:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions