Had something similar to this awhile back. Q247061
PSS ID Number: Q247061
Article last modified on 02-24-2001
winnt:5.5
The information in this article applies to:
- Microsoft Exchange Server, version 5.5
SYMPTOMS
If you use Microsoft Internet Information Service (IIS), a dial
MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pfefferkorn,
Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Store.exe error
H
Actually we are just now cutting over to a new network, so our Exchange
Servers IP's are changing. We cut over one server already and the only
issue is the coordination of the changing of IP's. Insure that your DNS
and WINS change accordingly. Also, if you have LMHOSTS files (which I do on
the
Exchange 5.5 SP4
We're getting ready to remove the first server from our site in the next
couple of weeks. I performed all the steps as defined in Q152959. I do
have one remaining question and it may be a stupid one at that. Our current
system contains the following (using a,b,c,d,e to simpli
First Server in Site Question.
Leave DNS alone and change the IP address of the new box to that of the old
box.
- Original Message -
From: "Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August
er in Site Question.
Ah then it doens't matter. Any server in the site can resolve the
username and point the profile to the correct server when creating the
profile.
- Original Message -
From: "Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange D
atter. The directory within a site is homogenuous
regardless of the server's role. The load is minimal.
- Original Message -
From: "Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001
I'm not using Windows 2000 server but am on NT 4.0 SP5. We use NTBACKUP to
backup all our Exchange servers on the nightly basis. I send the
corresponding log files to my account for verification on the daily basis
using BLAT. You can create a command procedure and use the AT scheduler to
launch
Now this I like...one to save!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List
o__,
<|
/\
Talk to the hand!
that's between you & your accountant!
-Mich
One additional note. Once you enter the domain to be blocked you will have
to stop and restart the MTA as well as the IMS for it to take affect.
Another good reason to break off that component from the server housing the
mailboxes.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAI
Exchange 5.5 SP5
Well twice today our server hung. Went over to the console and it would not
respond. Keyboard was locked and no response. I had to power cycle the
system to get it back up and each time there is nothing in the event logs.
I wanted to get everyone's opinion as to where to start
I had the performance monitors running and there were no indications of
unusual behavior. We have since called out Dell and they had me run some
diagnostics. Looks as if we may have some bad memory.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
uch lately.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pfefferkorn,
Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Server locking up...flat line.
Exchange 5.5 SP5
Well twice today our server hung. Went over to t
too much lately.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pfefferkorn,
Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Server locking up...flat line.
Exchange 5.5 SP5
Well twice today our server hung. Went over
Exchange 5.5 SP4
We lost one of our main Exchange server this morning and are awaiting
hardware support to come in. One curious items is that when we connect to
the OWA through one of the other servers that are still up...they users
cannot log in. If they go directly to the system that houses t
phrase
"phallic symbol." Before Freud, people would look at a tower or a pine tree
and say, "I love it. I wish I knew why." -- Dennis Miller
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pfefferkorn,
Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Sent: Friday, A
OWA server. Server unavailable == permission denied.
Just a WAG.
- Original Message -----
From: "Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:18 AM
Subject: OWA access denied.
: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA access denied.
If that is the case, and it probably is, then Q244850, and Q248081
may help.
John Allhiser MCSE CCNA
Network Engineer
Business Men's Assurance
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I feel just horrible. Been watching this all morning. The number of
innocent lives lost! I don't believe that the rescue workers anticipated
the building collapsing either, so I'm fairly certain a number of the
rescuers will also be fatalities. This is surely a sad day for all of us.
-O
Yes, NAI released an extra.dat Still waiting for trend to put out an
update.
Pete Pfefferkorn
Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
University of Cincinnati
51 Goodman Street
Cincinnati, OH 45221
Phone - (513) 556-9076
Fax - (513) 556-2042
-Original Message-
From: Etts, Rus
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Had a general question to post. We have the IIS 4.0 running on a couple of
Exchange systems for OWA access. It's not on the systems that house the
primary mailbox accounts and the systems were patched when code red came
out.
One of our Web Administrators suggested making some
C.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:13 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Additional steps to prevent IIS compromise!
Subject: Additional steps to prevent IIS compromise!
Exchange 5.5
Exchange 5.5 SP4
I finally figured out what is causing our IIS to stop on our OWA servers. I
had a user that received a message that was infected with the
"WORM_BADTRANS.B" virus (attachment "HAMSTER.DOC.pif"). ScanMail caught the
virus and deleted the attachment.
Now if the user gets into OWA
ons
Subject: RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
Ummm, how about deleting the message?
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
Exchange 5.5
sult of this virus's message.
Let me know if you find a solution!
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
Exchange 5.5 SP4
I fi
--Original Message-----
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
I'm running ScanMail 3.02. I have it set to delete the attachment if it's
infected. I do
you shouldn't rule out ScanMail
>>>as a potential problem. You're running a very old version.
>>>
>>>S>
>>>
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>Sent: Wedn
I just got off the phone with Trend about upgrading and they recommended
going to the AVAPI version since they were experiencing problems with the
ESE. I was hoping to upgrade to the ESE later this week. I'll have to call
them back and inquire about what issue they have with their ESE version.
Well I finally bit the bullet and upgraded to ScanMail 3.52. I currently
have it running in AVAPI mode as well as MAPI mode. I was hoping that the
MAPI mode would not create a realscan process for every 200 accounts that it
logs into, as it did in the old version, but looks as if I'm wrong.
A
ge-
> From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:59 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: ScanMail 3.52 AVAPI & MAPI mode.
>
>
> Well I finally bit the bullet and upgraded to ScanMail 3.52.
> I currentl
Doesn't Scan Mail allow you to replace the attached infected message with a
replacement text file? I just upgraded and I though I saw that feature.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Exchange 5.5 SP4, ScanMail 3.52
We upgraded to ScanMail 3.52 and are running in both AVAPI and MAPI mode. I
understand that running AVAPI, you lose the sender/recipient information for
viruses caught in the log files. I'm a little confused on my testing on how
notification works. I sent a test
AVAPI, this is a limitation of the AVAPI. My
suggestion would be to use Scanmail 3.7x which uses ESE based scanning.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 6:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off topic: Sca
This is going to be a little off topic, but I thought I would post it in
case someone ran into it as well.
I have ScanMail moving infected files. One of the files that was moved into
the \VIRUS area was a FUN.MP3 that is listed as a short cut. I cannot
delete due to a sharing violation (believe
% CPU
Not sure about Scanmail having the file locked but have you tried del or
attrib from a DOS prompt?
Allan
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off topic: EXPLORE
why dont you stop the services for trend and then delete the file. After
all that just start up the services again.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off
If you highlight the server and click on MTA you will see a Message Size
limit which should apply to all users on the server.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Limiting size of
erver. The messages sent between
users on the same server do not hit the MTA and therefore are not affected
by the limits you set at the MTA. In order to achieve what he wants, he has
to set the limits at the mailbox level.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [m
Exchange 5.5 SP4.
We have a large number of public folders and I would like to add a user as
an owner of the folders. I'm looking for a way to import that information
versus selecting each folder and manually doing it. I'm familiar with
directory export and exporting mailbox and importing of su
I'll give that a shot. Thanks and Happy Holidays!
-Original Message-
From: kim cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Setting Permissions on Public Folders
also, use the PF tools on the resource kit to set the
Exchange 5.5. We recently upgraded to ScanMail 3.52 and are running in
AVAPI as well as MAPI mode. I'm a little confused on how the AVAPI works
when it comes to cleaning and notifications. I know that you lose the
sender and recipient information and I'm wondering why that is the case? Is
it t
I just got a message from OAR.NET referring to a virus alert. Still trying
to find out more about it, but I thought I would post this just in case.
Trying to find out more on this one to see if there is an attachment I can
block.
From: Jodi Santini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, Janua
yer.com
> -Original Message-----
> From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:19 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: New Virus ShakerWorld variant?
>
>
> I just got a message from OAR.NET referring to a virus
OAR.NET has seen it and issued a warning to us, which is why I posted the
message. NAI states that DAT file 4180 will catch this virus, but their
current dat download is at 4179.
-Original Message-
From: Joe User [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 5:11 PM
To: Exch
I just upgraded our server to NT 4.0 SP6A and Exchange 5.5 SP4.
Now one of our servers that houses the Internet Mail Service seems to stop
processing mail every two weeks or so. My link monitors show the outbound
queue stacking up mail, and when you try to stop the IMS service it says
service do
her man's floor"
|+--->
| | "Pfefferkorn, Pete |
|| (PFEFFEPE)" |
|| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
|| Sent by: |
|| bounce-exchan
Just a note to everyone. We called Microsoft and inquired what the range
for the two random ports were that Exchange allocates to the client once it
connects to a socket. According to Microsoft the range is from 1,024 to
64,000.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ation out there...
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.
Just a note to everyone. We called Microsoft and inquired what the range
for
years now.
-Original Message-----
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.
Went through TechNet and couldn't find any reference to the actual range.
Found the art
is
to send the new mail notification (refresh command) to the client.
Stephen
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.
Went through TechNe
vent the view from refreshing. This results in the
APPEARANCE that mail is not coming in until you change folders, mail not
leaving the outbox, etc.,
Stephen
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:24 PM
To: Ex
dropped UDP new mail notifications with that connection
method than you would with VPN (at least that's been my experience).
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
> -Original Message-----
> From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFE
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Looked through technet and archives but didn't find anything. Just had a
customer call about some problems with calendaring. User A has appointments
setup in their calendar and when User B (who has Reviewer rights) tries to
create a New Appointment or Plan a Meeting and selects
usy switch?
-Original Message-----
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 1:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attendee Availability not seeing items.
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Looked through technet and archives but didn't find anythi
al Message-----
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attendee Availability not seeing items.
No, haven't tried that one yet. I'll give it a shot.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter,
Availability not seeing items.
Did you search for that error text on Technet?
It might be time to export to PST and reimport. I think something is
probably corrupted in that calendar.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001
busy.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, Octob
If you have a deletion retention period defined and someone POP's their mail
off the server, can you recover it? I always thought that when you pop it
removes it totally from the system and it could not be recovered.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
same fashion as using a pst
in this regard. When you move mail off the server (or the mail is downloaded
to a local pst folder), it deletes it out of the inbox and it can be
recovered with the Dumpster hack enabled and DIR...
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[
TED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 4:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attendee Availability not seeing items.
Do a search on Technet for NoOST=3.
Tom.
-Original Message-----
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 4:46 PM
To
The most active server is:
3,100 Users
27 Gig for IS
50 Meg is largest.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?
I'm curious about the size of peopl
your
efficiency
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pfefferkorn,
Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?
The
I'm curious...for those sites that have a IS store > 70 Gig, what backup
solution (hardware/software) do you use and how long does it take to perform
a full backup of your stores?
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:18 PM
To:
We had a similar problem where the system just locked. Console froze and
only resort was to power cycle the system. If the system totally locked up
it may indicate a hardware problem. At least in our case it was. Check to
see if you might have some bad memory in the system. We had a couple of
Exchange 5.5 SP4
One of my tasks in the next week or so is to get SSL installed on Exchange
to allow users to change their passwords via the OWA client. I was
wondering what everyone's opinion was regarding using a 40 bit versus the
128 bit key for Exchange. Can I use the 40 bit versus the 128
It's listed as low risk on the security web page.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: Trend Micro Medium Risk Virus Alert - TROJ_KLEZ.C
-Original Message-
From: T
We just had Dell come in and perform an Exchange Assessment and Best
Practices review on our installation. One product that they suggested we
look at was DoubleTake which replicates Exchange database information in
real-time over the LAN from a source server to a standby server. The
standby serv
Exchange 5.5 SP4. The last couple of days, two of our OWA servers stop
responding to users requests. Looking at the event logs I found Event ID 5
for the following:
Error: File /exchange/USA/forms/IPM/NOTE/read.asp Unexpected error
Error: File /exchange/USA/logon.asp Unexpected error
Error:
I got a hold of Microsoft regarding the issue of our OWA servers getting the
ASP 0115 and having to restart the IIS. They recommended that I upgrade the
systems to NT 6.0 spa, install the security patches, and apply the rollup
hot fix for CDO/CDOHTML. Has anyone else applied this hot fix?
Q2896
Shit for brains right now...make that NT 4.0 sp6a. Been a long day.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: CDO/CDOHTML Hot Fix Q289606
I got a hold of Microsoft
Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 SP6A.
Well, Microsoft has recommended that I upgrade to NT 4.0 SP6A to resolve the
OWA ASP 0115 error. Our OWA is now stopping ever few hours. They sent me a
link to follow for installing and securing the NT 4.0 system. The link to
secure the system is as follows:
http:
I would agree with memory. Had the same thing happen to myself and it
turned out to be a couple of bad dimms. The system totally locked...no
response!
-Original Message-
From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subjec
I initiated a block on .SCR extensions in ScanMail. As soon as I initiated
a block I started seeing it. Shit!!! I'm waiting for Trend to get a
pattern, but I would suggest blocking until it's available.
-Original Message-
From: Usachev Oleg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, De
Just wanted to thank Paul and this list about the warning. I was able to
send out an alert and notify the users (Exchange and non-Exchange) and I
think we avoided some additional problems with the notification.
Thanks again!
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Got a user that is getting the enclosed error at times when accessing
Outlook. Looking at Technet, I found article Q247972 which states that the
Schedule + Free Busy Public Folder does not have Editor for Default
Permissions. I check the folder and the settings are correct.
I recall that someone once posted a link to a page that stated the end of
life date for various MS products. I've looked high and low for it and
can't seem to locate it. Went to the archive, looked in TechNet, went to MS
site...but could no find anything. Anyone recall what the link was or tell
://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle.asp
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: End of Support for MS products link
I recall that someone once posted a link to a page that stated the end
Well,
First let me apologize for the vagueness of this question. Just starting to
read up on Exchange 2000. I've been asked by management to spec out the
possibility of deploying Exchange 2,000 to all users on our campus (40,000
users). I'm reading Tony Redmond's book on Exchange 2000 and it m
One change, Our Dells are 6350's not 8650's.
-Original Message-----
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2,000 scalability question.
Well,
First let me apologi
We have the MTA's set for 20 meg. The IMS's set for 20 meg. And we also
have each users profile for a maximum size of 20 meg.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Reaso
Exchange 5.5 sp4.
Here's is my question. We have one PDC which serves as a IMC as well as an
OWA server. We currently have a second system with is our BDC which also
has IMC and OWA on it. Currently both systems have backup tape units and
tapes rotated on the nightly basis.
The BDC needs to b
You probably should place the limit on each mailbox as well. The MTA only
is used between servers, so this would no apply to users on the same
Exchange server.
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I noticed that Trends Scan Engine is now 6.1, but when I try to update from
the 5.630-1025 via the console it says there are no newer versions. I sent
a message to Trend inquiring on this one, but was wondering if anyone else
is seeing the same issue. Possibly a manual download is require?
Exchange 5.5 SP3.
I've been instructed to move our Exchange deployment into our DMZ. I
know...I know...VPN, not my decision. We're performing a test and put a
Wins and Exchange server over in the DMZ, created a few test accounts.
We can get in from our private network with no problems. The is
e DMZ are in
> the same domain as your corporate?
>
> Also, I am a little baffled. Since when does WINS have
> anything to do with Password change?
>
> Andrew,
> MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
We just cut over to the ESE version about 2 weeks ago. Was a little
reluctant since the initial release of the product had some issues, but that
seems to have been cleared up. We have 6,400+ users on two systems, so
cutting over to the ESE version really reduced the load on the system sense
we d
Wow! Just looked at pricing. We have a student mail system with 45,000
users which we have no virus scanning software on because it's cost
prohibitive. It's Linux with SMTP so I think I'll look at this for that
system. I might even look at this for our front end IMC's on Exchange as
well for c
Exchange 5.5
Simple question I think. We need to start scanning the files on our
Exchange Servers. We had a trojan get through which may have originated
from one of our workstations. We have ScanMail running on the Servers for
Exchange. We have a site license with MCafee and could get the se
, you will need to
> exclude the
> \Exchsrvr folders
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 6:10 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Scanning Exchange Server for Viruses
&g
I've seen a number of the MovieWorld viruses being caught by McAfee but
Trend doesn't seem to see it. Is it another name under Trend?
Pete Pfefferkorn
Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
University of Cincinnati
51 Goodman Street
Cincinnati, OH 45221
Phone - (513) 556-9076
Fax - (513
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 2000.
We are finally going to be moving our Exchange deployment into a safe zone.
The servers will be put into it's own secure segment that will have a
firewall for internal and external users. We are requiring users to use a
VPN client if they are coming in from an ISP, but
Somewhat off topic.
We recently upgraded our servers to Windows 2000 server with SP3 running
Exchange 5.5 SP5. The systems have DLT 7000's attached to them and I have a
recovery server that I use for restoration that also has a DLT 7000.
After upgrading the boxes to 2000 SP3 (including my recove
We're using current backups performed on 2000 SP3. Both systems running the
same which has really got me puzzled why it will not read on the recovery
box.
-Original Message-
From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 5:48 PM
To: Exchange Dis
We're in the process of locking down ports for our Exchange 5.5 deployment.
I've read the FAQ's and found ports required, but have a couple of
questions.
If you have a Exchange Server with no IMC on it just mailboxes do you need
TCP 25 SMTP enabled. I would think it should only be enabled for the
Thanks this is good information as I learn little by little. Our IMC is on
it's own separate box, so that would require port 25. The systems that
house our users do not have a IMC's but pass mail to the dedicated IMC's, so
they don't need port 25.
X.400...since it's used internally by 5.5, sound
I apologize if this got posted before. I didn't see it come through and I
checked the archives.
Exchange 5.5 SP4
We are starting to experiment putting in a secondary SMTP address for
selected users ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). I can add a secondary smtp address using
the Secondary-Proxy-Addresses field
m: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 1:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: removal of secondary SMTP address
I apologize if this got posted before. I didn't see
it come through and I checked the archive
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6A, IIS 4.0
We recently started encountering a problem with IIS and INETINFO Dr.
Watsoning on us with Event 4097. We ended up rebuilding the entire system
from scratch but we are still encountering the problem. Event as follows:
The application, exe\inetinfo.dbg, gen
Forgot...we also had the CDO CDOHTML hot fix installed Q289606.EXE for
Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Dr Watson on INETINFO Event 4097
Exchange 5.5 SP4
al Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Dr Watson on INETINFO Event 4097
When did this start? Is there anything else running on this box?
- Original Message -----
From: "Pfefferkorn,
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo