Compaq Computer Corporation
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pfefferkorn,
Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Store.exe error
Had something similar
Actually we are just now cutting over to a new network, so our Exchange
Servers IP's are changing. We cut over one server already and the only
issue is the coordination of the changing of IP's. Insure that your DNS
and WINS change accordingly. Also, if you have LMHOSTS files (which I do on
Exchange 5.5 SP4
We're getting ready to remove the first server from our site in the next
couple of weeks. I performed all the steps as defined in Q152959. I do
have one remaining question and it may be a stupid one at that. Our current
system contains the following (using a,b,c,d,e to
Server in Site Question.
Leave DNS alone and change the IP address of the new box to that of the old
box.
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:03 PM
Subject: Removal of First
Question.
Ah then it doens't matter. Any server in the site can resolve the
username and point the profile to the correct server when creating the
profile.
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
. The directory within a site is homogenuous
regardless of the server's role. The load is minimal.
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:28 PM
Subject: RE: Removal of First Server in Site
Exchange 5.5 SP5
Well twice today our server hung. Went over to the console and it would not
respond. Keyboard was locked and no response. I had to power cycle the
system to get it back up and each time there is nothing in the event logs.
I wanted to get everyone's opinion as to where to
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pfefferkorn,
Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Server locking up...flat line.
Exchange 5.5 SP5
Well twice today our server hung. Went over to the console
. Server unavailable == permission denied.
Just a WAG.
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:18 AM
Subject: OWA access denied.
Exchange 5.5 SP4
We lost one of our main
I feel just horrible. Been watching this all morning. The number of
innocent lives lost! I don't believe that the rescue workers anticipated
the building collapsing either, so I'm fairly certain a number of the
rescuers will also be fatalities. This is surely a sad day for all of us.
Yes, NAI released an extra.dat Still waiting for trend to put out an
update.
Pete Pfefferkorn
Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
University of Cincinnati
51 Goodman Street
Cincinnati, OH 45221
Phone - (513) 556-9076
Fax - (513) 556-2042
-Original Message-
From: Etts,
: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:13 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Additional steps to prevent IIS compromise!
Subject: Additional steps to prevent IIS compromise!
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Had a general question to post
Just a note to everyone. We called Microsoft and inquired what the range
for the two random ports were that Exchange allocates to the client once it
connects to a socket. According to Microsoft the range is from 1,024 to
64,000.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL
there...
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.
Just a note to everyone. We called Microsoft and inquired what the range
for the two random
.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.
Went through TechNet and couldn't find any reference to the actual range.
Found the articles on how
this
to send the new mail notification (refresh command) to the client.
Stephen
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.
Went through TechNet
refreshing. This results in the
APPEARANCE that mail is not coming in until you change folders, mail not
leaving the outbox, etc.,
Stephen
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
notifications with that connection
method than you would with VPN (at least that's been my experience).
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Looked through technet and archives but didn't find anything. Just had a
customer call about some problems with calendaring. User A has appointments
setup in their calendar and when User B (who has Reviewer rights) tries to
create a New Appointment or Plan a Meeting and
?
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 1:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attendee Availability not seeing items.
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Looked through technet and archives but didn't find anything. Just had
-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attendee Availability not seeing items.
No, haven't tried that one yet. I'll give it a shot.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL
Availability not seeing items.
Did you search for that error text on Technet?
It might be time to export to PST and reimport. I think something is
probably corrupted in that calendar.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001
If you have a deletion retention period defined and someone POP's their mail
off the server, can you recover it? I always thought that when you pop it
removes it totally from the system and it could not be recovered.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
The most active server is:
3,100 Users
27 Gig for IS
50 Meg is largest.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?
I'm curious about the size of
to your
efficiency
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pfefferkorn,
Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5
I'm curious...for those sites that have a IS store 70 Gig, what backup
solution (hardware/software) do you use and how long does it take to perform
a full backup of your stores?
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:18 PM
To:
We had a similar problem where the system just locked. Console froze and
only resort was to power cycle the system. If the system totally locked up
it may indicate a hardware problem. At least in our case it was. Check to
see if you might have some bad memory in the system. We had a couple
Exchange 5.5 SP4
One of my tasks in the next week or so is to get SSL installed on Exchange
to allow users to change their passwords via the OWA client. I was
wondering what everyone's opinion was regarding using a 40 bit versus the
128 bit key for Exchange. Can I use the 40 bit versus the
It's listed as low risk on the security web page.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: Trend Micro Medium Risk Virus Alert - TROJ_KLEZ.C
-Original Message-
From:
Exchange 5.5 SP4. The last couple of days, two of our OWA servers stop
responding to users requests. Looking at the event logs I found Event ID 5
for the following:
Error: File /exchange/USA/forms/IPM/NOTE/read.asp Unexpected error
Error: File /exchange/USA/logon.asp Unexpected error
Error:
I got a hold of Microsoft regarding the issue of our OWA servers getting the
ASP 0115 and having to restart the IIS. They recommended that I upgrade the
systems to NT 6.0 spa, install the security patches, and apply the rollup
hot fix for CDO/CDOHTML. Has anyone else applied this hot fix?
Shit for brains right now...make that NT 4.0 sp6a. Been a long day.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: CDO/CDOHTML Hot Fix Q289606
I got a hold of Microsoft
Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 SP6A.
Well, Microsoft has recommended that I upgrade to NT 4.0 SP6A to resolve the
OWA ASP 0115 error. Our OWA is now stopping ever few hours. They sent me a
link to follow for installing and securing the NT 4.0 system. The link to
secure the system is as follows:
I would agree with memory. Had the same thing happen to myself and it
turned out to be a couple of bad dimms. The system totally locked...no
response!
-Original Message-
From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I initiated a block on .SCR extensions in ScanMail. As soon as I initiated
a block I started seeing it. Shit!!! I'm waiting for Trend to get a
pattern, but I would suggest blocking until it's available.
-Original Message-
From: Usachev Oleg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
Just wanted to thank Paul and this list about the warning. I was able to
send out an alert and notify the users (Exchange and non-Exchange) and I
think we avoided some additional problems with the notification.
Thanks again!
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL
: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
Ummm, how about deleting the message?
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
Exchange 5.5 SP4
I finally
message.
Let me know if you find a solution!
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
Exchange 5.5 SP4
I finally figured out what
Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
I'm running ScanMail 3.02. I have it set to delete the attachment if it's
infected. I don't see an option
Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
It's catching the virus and deleting it. The message header
is causing the problem from what I can see
I just got off the phone with Trend about upgrading and they recommended
going to the AVAPI version since they were experiencing problems with the
ESE. I was hoping to upgrade to the ESE later this week. I'll have to call
them back and inquire about what issue they have with their ESE version.
Well I finally bit the bullet and upgraded to ScanMail 3.52. I currently
have it running in AVAPI mode as well as MAPI mode. I was hoping that the
MAPI mode would not create a realscan process for every 200 accounts that it
logs into, as it did in the old version, but looks as if I'm wrong.
, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ScanMail 3.52 AVAPI MAPI mode.
Well I finally bit the bullet and upgraded to ScanMail 3.52.
I currently have it running in AVAPI mode as well as MAPI
mode. I was hoping
Doesn't Scan Mail allow you to replace the attached infected message with a
replacement text file? I just upgraded and I though I saw that feature.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Exchange 5.5 SP4, ScanMail 3.52
We upgraded to ScanMail 3.52 and are running in both AVAPI and MAPI mode. I
understand that running AVAPI, you lose the sender/recipient information for
viruses caught in the log files. I'm a little confused on my testing on how
notification works. I sent a
, this is a limitation of the AVAPI. My
suggestion would be to use Scanmail 3.7x which uses ESE based scanning.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 6:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off topic: ScanMail
This is going to be a little off topic, but I thought I would post it in
case someone ran into it as well.
I have ScanMail moving infected files. One of the files that was moved into
the \VIRUS area was a FUN.MP3 that is listed as a short cut. I cannot
delete due to a sharing violation
Not sure about Scanmail having the file locked but have you tried del or
attrib from a DOS prompt?
Allan
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE
dont you stop the services for trend and then delete the file. After
all that just start up the services again.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic
If you highlight the server and click on MTA you will see a Message Size
limit which should apply to all users on the server.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Limiting size
. The messages sent between
users on the same server do not hit the MTA and therefore are not affected
by the limits you set at the MTA. In order to achieve what he wants, he has
to set the limits at the mailbox level.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto
Exchange 5.5 SP4.
We have a large number of public folders and I would like to add a user as
an owner of the folders. I'm looking for a way to import that information
versus selecting each folder and manually doing it. I'm familiar with
directory export and exporting mailbox and importing of
Exchange 5.5. We recently upgraded to ScanMail 3.52 and are running in
AVAPI as well as MAPI mode. I'm a little confused on how the AVAPI works
when it comes to cleaning and notifications. I know that you lose the
sender and recipient information and I'm wondering why that is the case? Is
it
I just got a message from OAR.NET referring to a virus alert. Still trying
to find out more about it, but I thought I would post this just in case.
Trying to find out more on this one to see if there is an attachment I can
block.
From: Jodi Santini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: New Virus ShakerWorld variant?
I just got a message from OAR.NET referring to a virus alert.
Still trying to find out more about it, but I
OAR.NET has seen it and issued a warning to us, which is why I posted the
message. NAI states that DAT file 4180 will catch this virus, but their
current dat download is at 4179.
-Original Message-
From: Joe User [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 5:11 PM
To:
I just upgraded our server to NT 4.0 SP6A and Exchange 5.5 SP4.
Now one of our servers that houses the Internet Mail Service seems to stop
processing mail every two weeks or so. My link monitors show the outbound
queue stacking up mail, and when you try to stop the IMS service it says
service
|+---
|| Pfefferkorn, Pete |
|| (PFEFFEPE) |
|| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|| Sent by: |
|| bounce-exchange-148870@ls|
|| .swynk.com
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Got a user that is getting the enclosed error at times when accessing
Outlook. Looking at Technet, I found article Q247972 which states that the
Schedule + Free Busy Public Folder does not have Editor for Default
Permissions. I check the folder and the settings are correct.
I recall that someone once posted a link to a page that stated the end of
life date for various MS products. I've looked high and low for it and
can't seem to locate it. Went to the archive, looked in TechNet, went to MS
site...but could no find anything. Anyone recall what the link was or
://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle.asp
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: End of Support for MS products link
I recall that someone once posted a link to a page that stated the end
Well,
First let me apologize for the vagueness of this question. Just starting to
read up on Exchange 2000. I've been asked by management to spec out the
possibility of deploying Exchange 2,000 to all users on our campus (40,000
users). I'm reading Tony Redmond's book on Exchange 2000 and it
One change, Our Dells are 6350's not 8650's.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2,000 scalability question.
Well,
First let me apologize
We have the MTA's set for 20 meg. The IMS's set for 20 meg. And we also
have each users profile for a maximum size of 20 meg.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Exchange 5.5 sp4.
Here's is my question. We have one PDC which serves as a IMC as well as an
OWA server. We currently have a second system with is our BDC which also
has IMC and OWA on it. Currently both systems have backup tape units and
tapes rotated on the nightly basis.
The BDC needs to
You probably should place the limit on each mailbox as well. The MTA only
is used between servers, so this would no apply to users on the same
Exchange server.
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I noticed that Trends Scan Engine is now 6.1, but when I try to update from
the 5.630-1025 via the console it says there are no newer versions. I sent
a message to Trend inquiring on this one, but was wondering if anyone else
is seeing the same issue. Possibly a manual download is require?
Exchange 5.5 SP3.
I've been instructed to move our Exchange deployment into our DMZ. I
know...I know...VPN, not my decision. We're performing a test and put a
Wins and Exchange server over in the DMZ, created a few test accounts.
We can get in from our private network with no problems. The
corporate?
Also, I am a little baffled. Since when does WINS have
anything to do with Password change?
Andrew,
MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:26 AM
Posted
We just cut over to the ESE version about 2 weeks ago. Was a little
reluctant since the initial release of the product had some issues, but that
seems to have been cleared up. We have 6,400+ users on two systems, so
cutting over to the ESE version really reduced the load on the system sense
we
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6A, IIS 4.0
We recently started encountering a problem with IIS and INETINFO Dr.
Watsoning on us with Event 4097. We ended up rebuilding the entire system
from scratch but we are still encountering the problem. Event as follows:
The application, exe\inetinfo.dbg,
Forgot...we also had the CDO CDOHTML hot fix installed Q289606.EXE for
Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Dr Watson on INETINFO Event 4097
Exchange 5.5 SP4
-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Dr Watson on INETINFO Event 4097
When did this start? Is there anything else running on this box?
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL
say wipe the box clean and start over with w2k unless you think the box
is overworked, which could be the root of your problem. Looks like you
have the symbols installed, so why not give pss a call?
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
I was wondering if anyone else is seeing some new type of Spam coming in
from APNIC? This Spam is forging the return address to internal users and
they all have the same subject/content, so they seem to be related.
Save up to 70% on Your Current Term Life Insurance
know not everyone can, but I block all Asian IP ranges. Keeps both my
spam and hack attempts way down.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: APNIC Spam imitating internal users
This is a little off-topic. We recently went to a demonstration on
Mirapoint messaging systems. We're looking at Mirapoint as a possible
replacement to our aging student messaging system and potentially as
front-end servers for all incoming messages to the University. I was
wondering if
Exchange 5.5
I'm a little confused on Reverse DNS. I kind of understand the concept that
with Reverse DNS enabled the Mail from: entry must resolve to a valid domain
or it will get rejected. Some I have some basic questions:
I take it Exchange 5.5 does not support Reverse DNS?
How about
Exchange 5.5 SP4 under NT 2000 SP2.
Well we have our first 2000 server up running Exchange 5.5 SP3. I'm trying
to get the backups to run similar to what I had with NT 4.0. With the 4.0
version I had the cmd set to initialize any tape in the drive, backup and
eject and mail the logs for
not. But here's
a good article that solved this problem for me, and taught me a little
bit about RSM and NTBACKUP and scripting, too:
http://www.jsiinc.com/sube/tip2200/rh2265.htm
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.
Exchange 5.5 SP4 under NT 2000 SP2.
Well we have
Exchange 5.5 SP4
We just installed a new Exchange 5.5 server under Windows 2000 and are
moving mailboxes onto the new system. I've had a few users who are running
blackice on the desktop that are now stating that their accounts are
receiving a UDP probe from the new mail system and they are
be running Blackice on the desktop? Or do they all have
their
own internet connection?
--
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 20 September 2002 14:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: UDP port probe
have a firewall protecting
your network? are your users afraid of internal attacks?
regards,
Mikko Pludra
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 8:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: UDP port probe after moving
Exchange 5.5 SP4.
Sorry to post this again. Maybe someone new has some information.
Well the system that processes the @UC.EDU aliases for the University
finally took a big hit. Its a VMS system running PMDF and is run in a
different department. We've been asked to look at alternative
Wow! Just looked at pricing. We have a student mail system with 45,000
users which we have no virus scanning software on because it's cost
prohibitive. It's Linux with SMTP so I think I'll look at this for that
system. I might even look at this for our front end IMC's on Exchange as
well for
I've seen a number of the MovieWorld viruses being caught by McAfee but
Trend doesn't seem to see it. Is it another name under Trend?
Pete Pfefferkorn
Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
University of Cincinnati
51 Goodman Street
Cincinnati, OH 45221
Phone - (513) 556-9076
Fax -
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 2000.
We are finally going to be moving our Exchange deployment into a safe zone.
The servers will be put into it's own secure segment that will have a
firewall for internal and external users. We are requiring users to use a
VPN client if they are coming in from an ISP, but
Somewhat off topic.
We recently upgraded our servers to Windows 2000 server with SP3 running
Exchange 5.5 SP5. The systems have DLT 7000's attached to them and I have a
recovery server that I use for restoration that also has a DLT 7000.
After upgrading the boxes to 2000 SP3 (including my
We're using current backups performed on 2000 SP3. Both systems running the
same which has really got me puzzled why it will not read on the recovery
box.
-Original Message-
From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 5:48 PM
To: Exchange
We're in the process of locking down ports for our Exchange 5.5 deployment.
I've read the FAQ's and found ports required, but have a couple of
questions.
If you have a Exchange Server with no IMC on it just mailboxes do you need
TCP 25 SMTP enabled. I would think it should only be enabled for
Thanks this is good information as I learn little by little. Our IMC is on
it's own separate box, so that would require port 25. The systems that
house our users do not have a IMC's but pass mail to the dedicated IMC's, so
they don't need port 25.
X.400...since it's used internally by 5.5,
I apologize if this got posted before. I didn't see it come through and I
checked the archives.
Exchange 5.5 SP4
We are starting to experiment putting in a secondary SMTP address for
selected users ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). I can add a secondary smtp address using
the Secondary-Proxy-Addresses
PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 1:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: removal of secondary SMTP address
I apologize if this got posted before. I didn't see
it come through and I checked the archives.
Exchange 5.5 SP4
We are starting
the hardware it
went away, but that also included a complete rebuild of the server too.
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:00 PM
Subject: IIS/OWA failing?
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Well,
We finally called MS on our problem with OWA failing on our 2000 servers and
having to reboot the system to get IIS restarted. Microsoft looked at the
dumps and had us install the Exchange Server 5.5 Post-SP4 Outlook Web Access
Fixes as stated in Q313576. The fix includes files:
This might be somewhat of a vague question. We current have a
DellPowervault LTO 110T backup tape drive on our primary Exchange Server.
It will back up 100 Gig non-compressed or 200 Gig compressed. Does anyone
know the maximum size an Exchange DB can be if you use compression on the
tape? I'm
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Backup onto LTO and compression question.
Does it matter?
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED
drivers for the SCSI cards have
a bug in them.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:41 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Andy,
Got it...looks good!
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium OWA screenshots
if anyone wants to play with Titanium OWA -
http://216.87.16.88/exchange
logon as
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
