RE: Store.exe error

2001-08-23 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Had something similar to this awhile back. Q247061 PSS ID Number: Q247061 Article last modified on 02-24-2001 winnt:5.5 The information in this article applies to: - Microsoft Exchange Server, version 5.5 SYMPTOMS If you use Microsoft Internet Information Service (IIS), a dial

RE: Store.exe error

2001-08-23 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe error H

RE: Moving Exchange to new segment

2001-08-28 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Actually we are just now cutting over to a new network, so our Exchange Servers IP's are changing. We cut over one server already and the only issue is the coordination of the changing of IP's. Insure that your DNS and WINS change accordingly. Also, if you have LMHOSTS files (which I do on the

Removal of First Server in Site Question.

2001-08-28 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Exchange 5.5 SP4 We're getting ready to remove the first server from our site in the next couple of weeks. I performed all the steps as defined in Q152959. I do have one remaining question and it may be a stupid one at that. Our current system contains the following (using a,b,c,d,e to simpli

RE: Removal of First Server in Site Question.

2001-08-28 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
First Server in Site Question. Leave DNS alone and change the IP address of the new box to that of the old box. - Original Message - From: "Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August

RE: Removal of First Server in Site Question.

2001-08-28 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
er in Site Question. Ah then it doens't matter. Any server in the site can resolve the username and point the profile to the correct server when creating the profile. - Original Message - From: "Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange D

RE: Removal of First Server in Site Question.

2001-08-28 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
atter. The directory within a site is homogenuous regardless of the server's role. The load is minimal. - Original Message - From: "Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001

RE: NT Backup

2001-08-29 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
I'm not using Windows 2000 server but am on NT 4.0 SP5. We use NTBACKUP to backup all our Exchange servers on the nightly basis. I send the corresponding log files to my account for verification on the daily basis using BLAT. You can create a command procedure and use the AT scheduler to launch

RE: User Friendly Exchange List

2001-08-29 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Now this I like...one to save! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List o__, <| /\ Talk to the hand! that's between you & your accountant! -Mich

RE: I need to block messages from a spammer

2001-08-29 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
One additional note. Once you enter the domain to be blocked you will have to stop and restart the MTA as well as the IMS for it to take affect. Another good reason to break off that component from the server housing the mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAI

Server locking up...flat line.

2001-08-30 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Exchange 5.5 SP5 Well twice today our server hung. Went over to the console and it would not respond. Keyboard was locked and no response. I had to power cycle the system to get it back up and each time there is nothing in the event logs. I wanted to get everyone's opinion as to where to start

RE: Server locking up...flat line.

2001-08-30 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
I had the performance monitors running and there were no indications of unusual behavior. We have since called out Dell and they had me run some diagnostics. Looks as if we may have some bad memory. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent

RE: Server locking up...flat line.

2001-08-31 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
uch lately. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Server locking up...flat line. Exchange 5.5 SP5 Well twice today our server hung. Went over to t

RE: Server locking up...flat line.

2001-08-31 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
too much lately. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Server locking up...flat line. Exchange 5.5 SP5 Well twice today our server hung. Went over

OWA access denied.

2001-08-31 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Exchange 5.5 SP4 We lost one of our main Exchange server this morning and are awaiting hardware support to come in. One curious items is that when we connect to the OWA through one of the other servers that are still up...they users cannot log in. If they go directly to the system that houses t

RE: Server locking up...flat line.

2001-08-31 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
phrase "phallic symbol." Before Freud, people would look at a tower or a pine tree and say, "I love it. I wish I knew why." -- Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) Sent: Friday, A

RE: OWA access denied.

2001-08-31 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
OWA server. Server unavailable == permission denied. Just a WAG. - Original Message ----- From: "Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:18 AM Subject: OWA access denied.

RE: OWA access denied.

2001-08-31 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA access denied. If that is the case, and it probably is, then Q244850, and Q248081 may help. John Allhiser MCSE CCNA Network Engineer Business Men's Assurance -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Urgent!

2001-09-11 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
I feel just horrible. Been watching this all morning. The number of innocent lives lost! I don't believe that the rescue workers anticipated the building collapsing either, so I'm fairly certain a number of the rescuers will also be fatalities. This is surely a sad day for all of us. -O

RE: New Virus / Worm ??

2001-09-18 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Yes, NAI released an extra.dat Still waiting for trend to put out an update. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 -Original Message- From: Etts, Rus

Additional steps to prevent IIS compromise!

2001-09-21 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Exchange 5.5 SP4 Had a general question to post. We have the IIS 4.0 running on a couple of Exchange systems for OWA access. It's not on the systems that house the primary mailbox accounts and the systems were patched when code red came out. One of our Web Administrators suggested making some

RE: Additional steps to prevent IIS compromise!

2001-09-21 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
C. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:13 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Additional steps to prevent IIS compromise! Subject: Additional steps to prevent IIS compromise! Exchange 5.5

OWA Crashing...know cause!!!

2001-12-12 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Exchange 5.5 SP4 I finally figured out what is causing our IIS to stop on our OWA servers. I had a user that received a message that was infected with the "WORM_BADTRANS.B" virus (attachment "HAMSTER.DOC.pif"). ScanMail caught the virus and deleted the attachment. Now if the user gets into OWA

RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!

2001-12-12 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
ons Subject: RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!! Ummm, how about deleting the message? -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Crashing...know cause!!! Exchange 5.5

RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!

2001-12-12 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
sult of this virus's message. Let me know if you find a solution! Aaron -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Crashing...know cause!!! Exchange 5.5 SP4 I fi

RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!

2001-12-12 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
--Original Message----- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!! I'm running ScanMail 3.02. I have it set to delete the attachment if it's infected. I do

RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!

2001-12-12 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
you shouldn't rule out ScanMail >>>as a potential problem. You're running a very old version. >>> >>>S> >>> >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Wedn

RE: Trend Micro ESE vs. AVAPI

2001-12-12 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
I just got off the phone with Trend about upgrading and they recommended going to the AVAPI version since they were experiencing problems with the ESE. I was hoping to upgrade to the ESE later this week. I'll have to call them back and inquire about what issue they have with their ESE version.

ScanMail 3.52 AVAPI & MAPI mode.

2001-12-14 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Well I finally bit the bullet and upgraded to ScanMail 3.52. I currently have it running in AVAPI mode as well as MAPI mode. I was hoping that the MAPI mode would not create a realscan process for every 200 accounts that it logs into, as it did in the old version, but looks as if I'm wrong. A

RE: ScanMail 3.52 AVAPI & MAPI mode.

2001-12-14 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
ge- > From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:59 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: ScanMail 3.52 AVAPI & MAPI mode. > > > Well I finally bit the bullet and upgraded to ScanMail 3.52. > I currentl

RE: stripping attachments

2001-12-18 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Doesn't Scan Mail allow you to replace the attached infected message with a replacement text file? I just upgraded and I though I saw that feature. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing?

2001-12-18 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Exchange 5.5 SP4, ScanMail 3.52 We upgraded to ScanMail 3.52 and are running in both AVAPI and MAPI mode. I understand that running AVAPI, you lose the sender/recipient information for viruses caught in the log files. I'm a little confused on my testing on how notification works. I sent a test

RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing?

2001-12-18 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
AVAPI, this is a limitation of the AVAPI. My suggestion would be to use Scanmail 3.7x which uses ESE based scanning. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 6:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic: Sca

Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU

2001-12-18 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
This is going to be a little off topic, but I thought I would post it in case someone ran into it as well. I have ScanMail moving infected files. One of the files that was moved into the \VIRUS area was a FUN.MP3 that is listed as a short cut. I cannot delete due to a sharing violation (believe

RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU

2001-12-18 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
% CPU Not sure about Scanmail having the file locked but have you tried del or attrib from a DOS prompt? Allan -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic: EXPLORE

RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU

2001-12-18 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
why dont you stop the services for trend and then delete the file. After all that just start up the services again. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off

RE: Limiting size of messages

2001-12-20 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
If you highlight the server and click on MTA you will see a Message Size limit which should apply to all users on the server. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Limiting size of

RE: Limiting size of messages

2001-12-20 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
erver. The messages sent between users on the same server do not hit the MTA and therefore are not affected by the limits you set at the MTA. In order to achieve what he wants, he has to set the limits at the mailbox level. S. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [m

Setting Permissions on Public Folders

2001-12-27 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have a large number of public folders and I would like to add a user as an owner of the folders. I'm looking for a way to import that information versus selecting each folder and manually doing it. I'm familiar with directory export and exporting mailbox and importing of su

RE: Setting Permissions on Public Folders

2001-12-27 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
I'll give that a shot. Thanks and Happy Holidays! -Original Message- From: kim cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Setting Permissions on Public Folders also, use the PF tools on the resource kit to set the

AVAPI Scanning question.

2001-12-28 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Exchange 5.5. We recently upgraded to ScanMail 3.52 and are running in AVAPI as well as MAPI mode. I'm a little confused on how the AVAPI works when it comes to cleaning and notifications. I know that you lose the sender and recipient information and I'm wondering why that is the case? Is it t

New Virus ShakerWorld variant?

2002-01-04 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
I just got a message from OAR.NET referring to a virus alert. Still trying to find out more about it, but I thought I would post this just in case. Trying to find out more on this one to see if there is an attachment I can block. From: Jodi Santini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, Janua

RE: New Virus ShakerWorld variant?

2002-01-04 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
yer.com > -Original Message----- > From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:19 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: New Virus ShakerWorld variant? > > > I just got a message from OAR.NET referring to a virus

RE: New Virus ShakerWorld variant?

2002-01-07 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
OAR.NET has seen it and issued a warning to us, which is why I posted the message. NAI states that DAT file 4180 will catch this virus, but their current dat download is at 4179. -Original Message- From: Joe User [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 5:11 PM To: Exch

IMS Outbound mail hangs, IMS service does not respond.

2002-01-08 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
I just upgraded our server to NT 4.0 SP6A and Exchange 5.5 SP4. Now one of our servers that houses the Internet Mail Service seems to stop processing mail every two weeks or so. My link monitors show the outbound queue stacking up mail, and when you try to stop the IMS service it says service do

RE: IMS Outbound mail hangs, IMS service does not respond.

2002-01-08 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
her man's floor" |+---> | | "Pfefferkorn, Pete | || (PFEFFEPE)" | || <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchan

RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.

2001-10-18 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Just a note to everyone. We called Microsoft and inquired what the range for the two random ports were that Exchange allocates to the client once it connects to a socket. According to Microsoft the range is from 1,024 to 64,000. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.

2001-10-18 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
ation out there... -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. Just a note to everyone. We called Microsoft and inquired what the range for

RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.

2001-10-18 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
years now. -Original Message----- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. Went through TechNet and couldn't find any reference to the actual range. Found the art

RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.

2001-10-18 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
is to send the new mail notification (refresh command) to the client. Stephen -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports. Went through TechNe

RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.

2001-10-19 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
vent the view from refreshing. This results in the APPEARANCE that mail is not coming in until you change folders, mail not leaving the outbox, etc., Stephen -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:24 PM To: Ex

RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.

2001-10-19 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
dropped UDP new mail notifications with that connection method than you would with VPN (at least that's been my experience). Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -Original Message----- > From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFE

Attendee Availability not seeing items.

2001-10-22 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Exchange 5.5 SP4 Looked through technet and archives but didn't find anything. Just had a customer call about some problems with calendaring. User A has appointments setup in their calendar and when User B (who has Reviewer rights) tries to create a New Appointment or Plan a Meeting and selects

RE: Attendee Availability not seeing items.

2001-10-22 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
usy switch? -Original Message----- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Attendee Availability not seeing items. Exchange 5.5 SP4 Looked through technet and archives but didn't find anythi

RE: Attendee Availability not seeing items.

2001-10-22 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
al Message----- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Attendee Availability not seeing items. No, haven't tried that one yet. I'll give it a shot. -Original Message- From: Hunter,

RE: Attendee Availability not seeing items.

2001-10-22 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Availability not seeing items. Did you search for that error text on Technet? It might be time to export to PST and reimport. I think something is probably corrupted in that calendar. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001

RE: Attendee Availability not seeing items.

2001-10-22 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
busy. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com > -Original Message- > From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, Octob

RE: Missing Mail

2001-10-23 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
If you have a deletion retention period defined and someone POP's their mail off the server, can you recover it? I always thought that when you pop it removes it totally from the system and it could not be recovered. -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent

RE: Missing Mail

2001-10-23 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
same fashion as using a pst in this regard. When you move mail off the server (or the mail is downloaded to a local pst folder), it deletes it out of the inbox and it can be recovered with the Dumpster hack enabled and DIR... -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[

RE: Attendee Availability not seeing items.

2001-10-23 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
TED]] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 4:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Attendee Availability not seeing items. Do a search on Technet for NoOST=3. Tom. -Original Message----- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 4:46 PM To

RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?

2001-10-24 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
The most active server is: 3,100 Users 27 Gig for IS 50 Meg is largest. -Original Message- From: Jason Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I'm curious about the size of peopl

RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?

2001-10-24 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
your efficiency Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? The

RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?

2001-10-25 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
I'm curious...for those sites that have a IS store > 70 Gig, what backup solution (hardware/software) do you use and how long does it take to perform a full backup of your stores? -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:18 PM To:

RE: EX5.5 Server just froze up - would post SP4 patches help?

2001-10-29 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
We had a similar problem where the system just locked. Console froze and only resort was to power cycle the system. If the system totally locked up it may indicate a hardware problem. At least in our case it was. Check to see if you might have some bad memory in the system. We had a couple of

SSL 40 bit versus 128 bit on Exchange.

2001-11-14 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Exchange 5.5 SP4 One of my tasks in the next week or so is to get SSL installed on Exchange to allow users to change their passwords via the OWA client. I was wondering what everyone's opinion was regarding using a 40 bit versus the 128 bit key for Exchange. Can I use the 40 bit versus the 128

RE: Trend Micro Medium Risk Virus Alert - TROJ_KLEZ.C

2001-11-14 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
It's listed as low risk on the security web page. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Trend Micro Medium Risk Virus Alert - TROJ_KLEZ.C -Original Message- From: T

Anyone using DoubleTake..opinions?

2001-11-21 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
We just had Dell come in and perform an Exchange Assessment and Best Practices review on our installation. One product that they suggested we look at was DoubleTake which replicates Exchange database information in real-time over the LAN from a source server to a standby server. The standby serv

OWA fails Event ID 5

2001-11-29 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Exchange 5.5 SP4. The last couple of days, two of our OWA servers stop responding to users requests. Looking at the event logs I found Event ID 5 for the following: Error: File /exchange/USA/forms/IPM/NOTE/read.asp Unexpected error Error: File /exchange/USA/logon.asp Unexpected error Error:

CDO/CDOHTML Hot Fix Q289606

2001-11-29 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
I got a hold of Microsoft regarding the issue of our OWA servers getting the ASP 0115 and having to restart the IIS. They recommended that I upgrade the systems to NT 6.0 spa, install the security patches, and apply the rollup hot fix for CDO/CDOHTML. Has anyone else applied this hot fix? Q2896

RE: CDO/CDOHTML Hot Fix Q289606

2001-11-29 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Shit for brains right now...make that NT 4.0 sp6a. Been a long day. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: CDO/CDOHTML Hot Fix Q289606 I got a hold of Microsoft

Upgrade to NT 4.0 SP6A

2001-11-29 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 SP6A. Well, Microsoft has recommended that I upgrade to NT 4.0 SP6A to resolve the OWA ASP 0115 error. Our OWA is now stopping ever few hours. They sent me a link to follow for installing and securing the NT 4.0 system. The link to secure the system is as follows: http:

RE: Server why, why me

2001-11-30 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
I would agree with memory. Had the same thing happen to myself and it turned out to be a couple of bad dimms. The system totally locked...no response! -Original Message- From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subjec

RE: New Virus outbreak

2001-12-04 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
I initiated a block on .SCR extensions in ScanMail. As soon as I initiated a block I started seeing it. Shit!!! I'm waiting for Trend to get a pattern, but I would suggest blocking until it's available. -Original Message- From: Usachev Oleg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, De

RE: New Virus outbreak

2001-12-04 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Just wanted to thank Paul and this list about the warning. I was able to send out an alert and notify the users (Exchange and non-Exchange) and I think we avoided some additional problems with the notification. Thanks again! -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Outlook error on free/busy data.

2002-01-24 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Exchange 5.5 SP4 Got a user that is getting the enclosed error at times when accessing Outlook. Looking at Technet, I found article Q247972 which states that the Schedule + Free Busy Public Folder does not have Editor for Default Permissions. I check the folder and the settings are correct.

End of Support for MS products link

2002-02-01 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
I recall that someone once posted a link to a page that stated the end of life date for various MS products. I've looked high and low for it and can't seem to locate it. Went to the archive, looked in TechNet, went to MS site...but could no find anything. Anyone recall what the link was or tell

RE: End of Support for MS products link

2002-02-01 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle.asp -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: End of Support for MS products link I recall that someone once posted a link to a page that stated the end

Exchange 2,000 scalability question.

2002-02-19 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Well, First let me apologize for the vagueness of this question. Just starting to read up on Exchange 2000. I've been asked by management to spec out the possibility of deploying Exchange 2,000 to all users on our campus (40,000 users). I'm reading Tony Redmond's book on Exchange 2000 and it m

RE: Exchange 2000 scalability question.

2002-02-19 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
One change, Our Dells are 6350's not 8650's. -Original Message----- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2,000 scalability question. Well, First let me apologi

RE: Reasonable message size limits

2002-02-27 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
We have the MTA's set for 20 meg. The IMS's set for 20 meg. And we also have each users profile for a maximum size of 20 meg. -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reaso

Exhange/BDC tape backup question.

2002-03-05 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Exchange 5.5 sp4. Here's is my question. We have one PDC which serves as a IMC as well as an OWA server. We currently have a second system with is our BDC which also has IMC and OWA on it. Currently both systems have backup tape units and tapes rotated on the nightly basis. The BDC needs to b

RE: attachment size limits

2002-03-12 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
You probably should place the limit on each mailbox as well. The MTA only is used between servers, so this would no apply to users on the same Exchange server. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Virus

2002-03-13 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
I noticed that Trends Scan Engine is now 6.1, but when I try to update from the 5.630-1025 via the console it says there are no newer versions. I sent a message to Trend inquiring on this one, but was wondering if anyone else is seeing the same issue. Possibly a manual download is require?

Change password for Exchange in DMZ

2002-03-14 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Exchange 5.5 SP3. I've been instructed to move our Exchange deployment into our DMZ. I know...I know...VPN, not my decision. We're performing a test and put a Wins and Exchange server over in the DMZ, created a few test accounts. We can get in from our private network with no problems. The is

RE: Change password for Exchange in DMZ

2002-03-14 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
e DMZ are in > the same domain as your corporate? > > Also, I am a little baffled. Since when does WINS have > anything to do with Password change? > > Andrew, > MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA > > > -Original Message- > From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)

RE: Which is better trend with ESE API or AVAPI/MAPI ???? For Exc hang e 5.5

2002-05-02 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
We just cut over to the ESE version about 2 weeks ago. Was a little reluctant since the initial release of the product had some issues, but that seems to have been cleared up. We have 6,400+ users on two systems, so cutting over to the ESE version really reduced the load on the system sense we d

RE: RAV Antivirus products

2002-10-10 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Wow! Just looked at pricing. We have a student mail system with 45,000 users which we have no virus scanning software on because it's cost prohibitive. It's Linux with SMTP so I think I'll look at this for that system. I might even look at this for our front end IMC's on Exchange as well for c

Scanning Exchange Server for Viruses

2002-10-16 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Exchange 5.5 Simple question I think. We need to start scanning the files on our Exchange Servers. We had a trojan get through which may have originated from one of our workstations. We have ScanMail running on the Servers for Exchange. We have a site license with MCafee and could get the se

RE: Scanning Exchange Server for Viruses

2002-10-16 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
, you will need to > exclude the > \Exchsrvr folders > > -Original Message- > From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 6:10 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Scanning Exchange Server for Viruses &g

MovieWorld Virus?

2002-10-16 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
I've seen a number of the MovieWorld viruses being caught by McAfee but Trend doesn't seem to see it. Is it another name under Trend? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513

Locking of Exchange ports question.

2002-10-30 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 2000. We are finally going to be moving our Exchange deployment into a safe zone. The servers will be put into it's own secure segment that will have a firewall for internal and external users. We are requiring users to use a VPN client if they are coming in from an ISP, but

Off topic DLT 7000 restore.

2002-11-18 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Somewhat off topic. We recently upgraded our servers to Windows 2000 server with SP3 running Exchange 5.5 SP5. The systems have DLT 7000's attached to them and I have a recovery server that I use for restoration that also has a DLT 7000. After upgrading the boxes to 2000 SP3 (including my recove

RE: Off topic DLT 7000 restore.

2002-11-19 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
We're using current backups performed on 2000 SP3. Both systems running the same which has really got me puzzled why it will not read on the recovery box. -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 5:48 PM To: Exchange Dis

Port blocking SMTP & X.400

2002-11-21 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
We're in the process of locking down ports for our Exchange 5.5 deployment. I've read the FAQ's and found ports required, but have a couple of questions. If you have a Exchange Server with no IMC on it just mailboxes do you need TCP 25 SMTP enabled. I would think it should only be enabled for the

RE: Port blocking SMTP & X.400

2002-11-21 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Thanks this is good information as I learn little by little. Our IMC is on it's own separate box, so that would require port 25. The systems that house our users do not have a IMC's but pass mail to the dedicated IMC's, so they don't need port 25. X.400...since it's used internally by 5.5, sound

removal of secondary SMTP address

2002-12-16 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
I apologize if this got posted before. I didn't see it come through and I checked the archives. Exchange 5.5 SP4 We are starting to experiment putting in a secondary SMTP address for selected users ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). I can add a secondary smtp address using the Secondary-Proxy-Addresses field

RE: removal of secondary SMTP address

2002-12-17 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
m: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: removal of secondary SMTP address I apologize if this got posted before. I didn't see it come through and I checked the archive

Dr Watson on INETINFO Event 4097

2002-06-06 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6A, IIS 4.0 We recently started encountering a problem with IIS and INETINFO Dr. Watsoning on us with Event 4097. We ended up rebuilding the entire system from scratch but we are still encountering the problem. Event as follows: The application, exe\inetinfo.dbg, gen

RE: Dr Watson on INETINFO Event 4097

2002-06-06 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
Forgot...we also had the CDO CDOHTML hot fix installed Q289606.EXE for Exchange. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Dr Watson on INETINFO Event 4097 Exchange 5.5 SP4

RE: Dr Watson on INETINFO Event 4097

2002-06-06 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
al Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Dr Watson on INETINFO Event 4097 When did this start? Is there anything else running on this box? - Original Message ----- From: "Pfefferkorn,

  1   2   >