That's a maximum of 12.5GB of data in your mailboxes.
Is there any compelling reason not to do a full backup every
night?
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Vinny
What the FAQ are you on about? ;-)
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 August 2001 17:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
BBC News reports attacks on the Pentagon and White House too
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 September 2001 15:04
To: Exchange
Oi!
Who are you calling an old lady? :-)
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 September 2001 14:39
To: Exchange Discussions
It looks like someone's used the Code Red backdoor to
install a new worm. The attacks seem to be coming from IIS servers...
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu
You stop the .eml files by getting all the (attacking?) PCs on
your network virus scanned with up to date antivirus software
with today's virus patterns. Also shut down your IIS services
if you think they may have been compromised.
Cheers,
Phil
-
indeed, but the software vendors could do better. microsoft
in particular should provide more efficient update processes and some
decent security tools. maybe even software that's secure out of the box.
dan
Too right! If ever there was a time for Service Pack 7 for NT 4.0, now
is it...
Gosh, that info is hard to find on www.microsoft.com...
NT4 server: 486/33, 32MB RAM if running IIS 4
Win 2K Prof: Pentium 133, 32MB RAM min, 64MB recommended
Win XP Ready: Win2K capable with at least 128MB RAM
Gave up looking at Microsoft's site having gleaned that much info.
Phil
Shouldn't that be cold?
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 September 2001 15:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MS Easybake
The practice of rotating tyres was routinely used long before
Milton Keynes was ever thought of.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Try here:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63/nimda.shtml
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 September 2001 16:28
To:
Just don't take them out with an automatic weapon
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 September 2001 16:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Go to http://www.incidents.org/react/nimbaprint.php
and digest what it has to say there.
Then visit http://www.microsoft.com/security
and follow the Nimba link.
Digest well. Panic. Have a cup of coffee and then devise
a sensible plan to roll out all those updates and patches
you never got
Yet another reason to use Mozilla!
McAfee's Nimba cleaner found readme.eml in Mozilla's cache on my PC :-)
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL
to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Randal, Phil
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 5:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
Microsoft's minimum specs are ludicrous to start with.
I just double what
, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 5:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
Have you tried running Win2K on a PC which
MS has posted a possible scenario for IE6 that would leave it vulnerable to
Nimda...
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/
topics/NimdaIE6.asp
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
Take a good look at RFC 2821 (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2821.html).
If there is a delivery failure after acceptance of a message, the
receiver-SMTP MUST formulate and mail a notification message. This
notification MUST be sent using a null () reverse path in the
envelope. The
In a nutshell, yes.
Make sure Exchange is patched to at least SP4.
Beg, borrow, or steal Hotfix 7 for Groupshield and apply
as soon as possible. This is a critical update, needed for
core functionality of the product. I would not try to run
Groupshield without it. Actually, I did, which is
Taking the subject of RAM tests by the horns, I'd
recommend using MemTest86 (from www.memtest86.com).
It's free, runs from a boot floppy, and is thorough.
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original
The attachment is now sample.exe
The dropped dll is httpodbc.dll
Worm is dropped into system directory as csrss.exe (was mmc.exe).
McAfee says it will be detected by existing DAT patterns.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Glad to hear someone's getting it!
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 November 2001 19:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
To flirt on this list
Is really out of order
I am a culprit
Phil :-)
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
_
List posting FAQ:
Two stroppy ladies
clashing on the list today
Oh how amusing
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 November 2001 16:18
To: Exchange
Netscape's invention, actually.
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/javascript/2001/04/06/js_history.html
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Black, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
They are the transaction logs created since the last full
backup of your exchange databases (by exchange-aware backup programs).
They normally get deleted after a successful backup.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford,
Computer Weekly in the UK published this gem a
few weeks back.
A senior editor from Bristol Classical Press,
inspired by his fallible spell checker, wrote:
Eye halve a spelling chequer
It came with my pea sea
It plainly marques four my revue
Miss steaks eye kin knot sea
Eye strike a quay and
We run Groupshield 4.5SP1 here, and had the same problems.
The fix is to increase OpenRetryDelay as detailed here:
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q264/7/31.ASP
We use 0x800 as our value.
It's also worth hounding NAI for hotfix 7 for Groupshield 4.5 too
and applying it. It
A publically accessible web server I set up this week (Apache, not IIS),
is getting hit by Nimda scans 5 times a day.
Some folks never learn.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From:
You've obviously
drunk too much booze already
not proper haiku
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Butler, Simon (London) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 November 2001 15:32
To:
Also try memtest86 from www.memtest86.com
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 November 2001 17:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Corporate policies may or may not allow all users to
access WindowsUpdate, or if they are using WinNT / 2000 / XP
they might not have local admin rights.
Not quite as simple as your glib assertion would have it.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
I had fun explaining to a naive-user in the weekend why
antivirus software was essential.
If it is that essential, why doesn't it come with
Windows XP?
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
p.s. I do part time
What Antivirus software is running on the exchange servers?
Is http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q264/7/31.ASP
relevant?
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Paul
Out of curiosity, does anyone know why Microsoft in their
infinite wisdom decided to make Temporary Internet Files
a property of the user (i.e. in their profile) as against
just one directory per PC?
The case of diskless workstations is a trivial one, so we
can ignore that and look for deeper
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Randal, Phil
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 7:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
Out of curiosity, does anyone know why Microsoft in their infinite
wisdom decided to make Temporary
, UK
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 December 2001 15:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 December 2001
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Randal, Phil
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 7:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
Given the negative side effects of this (huge amounts of
disk space
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spurious attachment permissions issue...
Out of curiosity, does anyone know why Microsoft in their
infinite wisdom decided
Yessir!
We all read your now (in)famous list.
Didn't we? ;-)
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 December 2001 17:05
To:
The fix is to increase OpenRetryDelay as detailed here:
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q264/7/31.ASP
We use 0x800 as our value.
If you're using Groupshield, get hotfix 7 from http://b2b.mcafee.com
(follow the download links for product updates, login, and look under
patches
oops, brain not in gear..
http://www.mcafeeb2b.com/naicommon/download/upgrade/login.asp
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil
Sent: 04 December 2001 17:29
: (501) 801-0457
Fax: (501) 801-0421
www.audiointl.com
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 5:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Look at
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q264/7/31.ASP
we use 0x800 for openretrydelay here.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Loftus Greig [mailto:[EMAIL
Some admins don't have that choice, alas :-(
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 December 2001 14:08
To: Exchange
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q264/7/31.ASP
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 December 2001 14:29
It would make my life as an Exchange Admin a bit easier
if we could just wipe all emails more than a year old
and then blame the Data Protection Act :-)
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original
RFC 2821 states that MTAs must accept all mails from ,
as they are delivery notification messages. Bouncing them,
as a lot of mailers do, is not RFC compliant and a bloody
nuisance :-)
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
That server should be more than adequate. User demand for
mailbox space will grow, though, unless you have limits
enforced.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Olds, Dominic
After installing Groupshield 4.5 SP1 install Hotfix 7 (from
www.mcafeeb2b.com).
Then consult Microsoft's knowledgebase Q264731 and increase the value of
OpenRetryDelay (we use 0x800 here).
Don't forget to install the message body scanning addon either (also
from mcafeeb2b.com).
Phil
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Groupshield and Exch 5.5 sp4
We just installed GS4.5.1, but in attempting to install Hotfix7 - it's
saying we need Hotfix 5.
Did we do something wrong?
Thx
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02
The M: drive (M for Mail) just has to be a throwback to the old
Microsoft Mail days. Someone on the Exchange team got a little
nostalgic, perhaps?
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
And what happens to you when someone auto-replies to your auto-reply???
BAD IDEA!
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 January
The fix may be to increase OpenRetryDelay as detailed here:
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q264/7/31.ASP
We use 0x800 as our value.
It's also worth hounding NAI for hotfix 7 for Groupshield 4.5 too
and applying it. It fixes some rather major bugs.
Phil
Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 February 2002 15:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Could not open one or more attachments!
The fix may be to increase OpenRetryDelay as detailed here:
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q264/7/31.ASP
I have to ask you
if there are any more jobs
with cars where you work
Lucky devil!
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08
Subject: RE: haiku friday
Phil,
Please rewrite line 2
Haiku should be five seven five
Your line is one short
Denny
At 03:21 PM 2/8/2002 +, Randal, Phil wrote:
I have to ask you
if there are any more jobs
with cars where you work
Lucky devil!
Phil
Just use www.google.com and prefix your query string with
site:microsoft.com (without the quote marks).
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Parkey [mailto:[EMAIL
Get KiXtart from www.kixtart.org
Then use the getfileversion function in a common KiXtart
login script to check, etc.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Michel, David
I think the two patches are independent of each other.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 February 2002 12:22
To: Exchange
Eeek, wasn't that the buggy one? ;-)
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 February 2002 12:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Why???
Favorites is extremely useful.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 February 2002 16:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public
Try running memtest86 from www.memtest86.com on it to
see if it's a hardware problem.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 March
Read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html and digest carefully.
Emails with a From: header are delivery notification messages.
RFC2822 says mailers must accept these messages (they can, if I
recall correctly, do what they like with them). There are an
awful lot on non-RFC2822-compliant mail
Oops, rfc2821... Slip of the finger and brain...
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 March 2002 17:10
To: Exchange Discussions
I've seen this once before after switching from circular
logging.
What I noticed was a discontiguous range of log file
numbers.
After carefully examining the log file date / timestamps
I deleted the oldest (leaving at least 2 days worth as we
do daily full backups) and rebooted the server
That looks fine to me. If the number of log files keeps
growing and older logs aren't being deleted then you have
problems.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: ExchDiscList
30 secons with google gave me this:
http://www.madras.fife.sch.uk/maths/descriptive6.html
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
I wish that they would
Do that to everyone
With dodgy boxes
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 15:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Go on, tell us, and we can put it to the test :-)
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 May 2002 16:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Don't forget David Harris's Mercury/32 from http://www.pmail.gen.nz
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 May 2002 14:39
To:
based systems
Did I read this right? FREE?
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
Don't forget David Harris's Mercury/32 from http
What a helpful response...
This might be more helpful.
What versions of Virusscan Groupshield?
If GS 4.5, is hotfix 7 applied?
I'd recommend upgrading to GS 5.0 if you're stuck with McAfee (we are :-( )
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
As one of Microsoft's patented Virus propagation engines?
Yup, very helpful.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 June 2002 14:15
-
From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 June 2002 14:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY
We are running 4.5.572.171
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:23
Well, one could put a Real AV solution in place versus some
piece of shite
SW that does nothing useful, but cause stress
Quit yer whinin... We get enough of that from Precht!
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9
Precisely because they do. Except they don't work the same.
MS's virus propagation engine has been removed :-)
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler (Mailing Lists)
Groupshield 4.5 has been superseded by Groupshield 5. If you must use
McAfee software, I'd skip GS 4.5 altogether and go straight to GS 5.0.
You can get it from here
http://www.mcafeeb2b.com/naicommon/download/upgrade/login.asp
(requires your NAI support grant number).
Otherwise you'll need
from rfc2821
6.1 Reliable Delivery and Replies by Email
When the receiver-SMTP accepts a piece of mail (by sending a 250 OK
message in response to DATA), it is accepting responsibility for
delivering or relaying the message. It must take this responsibility
seriously. It MUST NOT
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 June 2002 18:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Catch All...
... stuff snipped
http://vger.kernel.org/mxverify.html is a good one and checks some
RFC compliance issues too.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
From my experience, Groupshield 5 is a much better product than
its predecessors. Have you had experience of Groupshield 5,
Missy?
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From:
I'm too busy to look, but is this clarified in RFC 2821/2822?
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 July 2002 18:11
To: Exchange
Oh, just run Exchange Optimizer and force it to use no more than 256MB of
RAM.
Then get the boss to explain to all the users why it is running slower.
Phil ;-)
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original
A google search for SPOOLSS.DLL found it in a few seconds.
Sighs...
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Earl, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 August 2002 12:15
To:
ping workstation_name ???
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 September 2002 14:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Tracing
Do a KB search for OpenRetryDelay. It might solve
your problem.
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 September 2002
The 1221 report on your ISPRIV is what counts, as that's
the amount of whitespace in the database.
Are you running Mailbox Manager on the server?
We use it to purge old Deleted Items and Journal entries,
and it helps a lot. Configuring Outlook / office not to
journal helps too, if you don't
: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 9:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Revisiting offline defrag question
The 1221 report on your ISPRIV is what counts, as that's
the amount of whitespace in the database.
Are you running Mailbox Manager
That's one use for all your junk emails!
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Exchange.ListServe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 September 2002 14:08
To: Exchange
RFC2821 (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2821.html) section 6.1.
Such mails can be swallowed or ignored, but they should never be
bounced.
You can check your mail server's compliance here:
http://vger.kernel.org/mxverify.html
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Wrong!
See http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2821.html section 4.5.1.
postmaster is required.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:Tom.Meunier;courts.state.tx.us]
Plain text. Nothing more, nothing less.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 January 2003 16:03
To: Exchange Discussions
NDA with fries? Yummy!
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 February 2003 15:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Files
More to the point, JScript is DANGEROUS!
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/?url=/technet/security/bulletin/MS
03-008.asp
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Roger
On the subject of emails from , RFC2821 says your mailer must
accept them. It neededn't do anything with them, though.
There's a surprisingly large number of misconfigured mailers
which bounce them, alas.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Relay Help
Sooner or later I need to start using these guys:
http://www.rfc-ignorant.com/policy-dsn.php
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Randal
1: Nobody ever reads them
2: Nobody ever reads them
3: People read the message, and forget to read the disclaimer
4: go to 1
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse
For one, email-borneviruses originating from within your organisation
(especially those with recipients within your organisation) will be
trapped that way. Don't forget that the first thing some of these
pesky viruses do is disable the desktop PC's antivirus software.
Perimeter fence security
Nope, wrong. Once again you're assuming that all your desktops
are happily protected and working fine, in fact that every
link in the chain is in place and secure. With viruses you
cannot ensure that. You have to attack viruses robustly on
ALL fronts, with as few assumptions as possible.
The
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
