Why not just store them on the server; i.e. maiboxes and do away with .pst's?
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Dietz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PST Alternative?
I am
company that got their cable back up
and running first.
My only complain (minor) is when they started moving people to a different mail server
AND DIDN'T TELL ANYONE! So, when I couldn't email I had to call them and they just
gave me the new server's name.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem
I've got a 95 pound Malamute who plays chase games with my 5 pound cat. (And guess who
chases who.)
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
as before.
Any ideas why outbound mail will not go. Tried going to the Queues in the
IMS properties. Where I am use to seeing a pulldown box, his is gray with
no option to pull down.
Paul Done
_
List posting FAQ: http
assumptions about what's happening somewhere
beyond my control.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 December 2003 14
this problem?
TIA,
Paul
The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely for the
addressee. Access by any other party is unauthorised without the express
written permission of the sender. If you
or elsewhere.
Thanks for replying.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Matteson
Sent: 22 December 2003 14:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Outlook 2003 in cached mode
Isn't that the idea of a cached mode of operations
Okay that would make sense, but do you think therefore the period that the
server is queried can be customised?
TIA
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent: 22 December 2003 15:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slightly
My sentiments exactly, Erik. I think your post says it all regarding MVP's or any
other certification/award/whathaveyou.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 1:46 PM
To: Exchange
Messages.
Regards,
Paul.
-Original Message-
From: Becker, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 23 December 2003 7:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder replication problem
We are experiencing a mysterious problem with E2K public/system folder
replication
I cannot prove that an apple is red
Of course not..Granny Smith's are GREEN.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
ROLMAO
thanks, John, that was a good one.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA - File not found when logging out
You
Our Exchange server (2K) is also natted. We haven't had any problem that you seem to
be having.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 1:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
IMHO.
regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Parkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 December 2003 19:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Xwall
I am looking at putting an Xwall into place here. Are you
happy with it?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Mark
Cool site. Thanks for posting, Don.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 7:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP mail not reaching Exchange Server
Looking good from
I am pretty sure I saw this a few weeks ago. Fix was to stop and restart the
directory service.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua
(Greenville)
Sent: 10 December 2003 16:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Insufficient
with
the exchange part.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
***
The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be
confidential
and logs are on separate physical raid volumes so i figure that covers most
scenarios without being over the top..
regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 December 2003 22:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals
Those
We're running fw1 4.1 and not having any trouble with OWA; using 443.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: What ports to open
Your
We're also running E2K on an EMC FC4700 SAN. No problems so far and adding disk space
via another LUN is a snap.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 1:50 PM
To: Exchange
Are u sure? Trend says 690 is the latest and a search at Trend's site shows no hits
for yaha.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 12:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Thanks, Pete. I forgot their general search eng won't turn up viruses. One has to go
to the virus enc to search. I'm surprised that 691 is still in the CPR state. Trend
usually has them out of CPR within 24 hours.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message
to it, it
is
not there.
A) why is it not accessable B) where did it actually save it too?
C) can I just change the default location? outlook 2002
Jean-Paul Natola
Systems Administrator
Information Technology
Family Care International
588 Broadway Suite 503
New York, NY 10012
ok hope that works
Jean-Paul Natola
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: David, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 4:40 PM
Subject: RE: Default save outlook 2002
Its hidden. Change the options
that is Ideal considering they are used to Eudora which automatically
puts everything in the attach folder, However if I may ask once Exchange
is online will it take the attachment out of the Store and save it locally?
or will a copy remain in the store?
Jean-Paul Natola
email
OWA would be feasible, so can I get some suggestions here?
TIA
Jean-Paul Natola
Systems Administrator
Information Technology
Family Care International
588 Broadway Suite 503
New York, NY 10012
Phone:212-941-5300 xt 36
Fax:212-941-5563
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED
anyay. Just my 2 cents.
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jean-Paul
Natola
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 9:11 AM
To: Exchange
Not sure how feasible this is, but could you have something at the remote
sites like vpop that polls all mail for that sites users over pop3 they then
get it locally?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL
/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jean-Paul
Natola
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 9:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Ecxhange for far far away office
High speed? 14,4
Qiang,
Exchange will also support client connections over POP3 and IMAPv4.
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Qiang Peng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 November 2003 08:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Protocol for communication between Outlook and Exchange
Server
What version of Groupshield and are you using ESE scanning?
-Original Message-
From: Alastair Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 November 2003 17:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K services stopping
Last week I posting to this list about SMTP between our
current E2K
Thanks Michael. The old one certainly didn't work as well as we would like
so I'll give the new one a go.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 November 2003 15:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Ontrack PowerControls
The new version
looks like isb.paknet.com.pk isn't configured to accept mail for
mul.paknet.com.pk even though it's listed as an MX record.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message
Probably for the same reason we in I/S are being slowly pressured into it: herd
instinct.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
Hi everyone, I;m new to exchange ready to deploy, and I just received Symantec mail
security for Exchange, unfortunate since we are non-profit, we do not get any support
from Symantec in any way shape or form, Can any recommend a good practice for using
Mail
Security, as far as installing it on
Has anybody on the list had any experience with Sprint's email service? We had them
in for a meeting today. They offer both an anti-spam and an anti-virus service. MX
records are changed to point to Sprint servers where the mail is then subjected to
their a/s and a/v software.
Paul Chinnery
Actually, the price didn't seem that out of line. For the whole shebang (a/s, a/v,
dis recovery; i.e. they hold all our mail until we get back online), it came to around
$5K per year. Heck, the way Trend's been upping their maintenance fees just for a/v,
it almost seems a bargain.
Paul
I agree with you on that point, Ben. The spam part doesn't bother me too much but the
a/v does. It's a little troubling to give up that kind of control. And thank you for
pointing that out.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto
Really? Our price ranged from (and I haven't received an exact quote), IIRC, around
$2 to $3.20 per mailbox per month.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:17 PM
not too bad; let somebody else handle that
burden.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sprint Email Services:anti-spam/anti
Trend for email and desktop a/v and we've got a budget for spam but haven't
implemented it yet. That's why we met with Sprint.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:25 PM
I'm sure I read somewhere about some explot/vuln that involved DAV (which I
noticed in the headers) - maybe that has something to do with it?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
Whose server is identixps08.identix.com? It doesn't resolve to anything in
DNS using several online lookup tools and it doesn't appear as an MX record
for visionics.com.
regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 November 2003 17:26
Yup same here.from a month ago...
-Original Message-
From: Blouin, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 4:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: internet.com
Yes, I rec'd two old ones form a week ago.
Peter
-Original Message-
From:
Nobody got any thoughts on this problem?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 November 2003 12:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PFAdmin Rehome
Hmmm doing some more digging around I notice that the attributes Home-MTA
and Home-MDB
server? If this is the case won't I generate a whole lot of traffic?
Any advice / assistance would be much appreciated. Have also logged a call
with PSS but was after your thoughts as well.
Paul
The information
Hmmm doing some more digging around I notice that the attributes Home-MTA
and Home-MDB are set to the old damaged server. If the folder is already
replicated to the new server can I edit this attributes via ADSI to update
them to the new server?
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From
.
The one thing I do like about it is the logging - we use 5.5 and smtp
logging sucks, this logs everything to text, and the important info to csv
and all sort of stuff.. well worth a try IMHO.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24
You're right on that, Christopher. It's not a requirement. However, if an org does
not encrypt, they do need to document that fact and why they didn't implement it.
We've looked into it to a small degree but haven't started doing it (and, hopefully,
won't).
Paul Chinnery
Network
-filtering.html for
a way of plugging spamassassin into things.
Just give it a try, I also fall into the don't know much about linux
category, but I found it simple enough to pick up the info I needed, and
because it's linux there's a ton of free useful info on the web...
Paul
-Original Message
David,
Looked at this product but didn't like the idea of swapping my Priv database
over to a Pub database, just moves the problem around in Exchange. Legacy
Email I believe should be removed to improve Exchange times, but keep user
transparent access.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like
I've been told by an MS person that I don't need the patch if I have
post SP3 rollup installed.
-Original Message-
From: MS Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 24 October 2003 1:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: patch MS03-046 update
Dollars to donuts it is a 'view - unread messages'. We seem to go
through this every couple of months, and always comes out the same.
Paul M. Done, MCP
IT Consultant
Office of the President Academic Affairs
CSU San Bernardino
5500 University Parkway AD-104
San Bernardino, CA 92407
e: [EMAIL
take a look at psloglist in conjunction with something like blat - that
should be able to do it.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Eric Holtzclaw [mailto
You'll have to go into user's #2 mailbox in outlook, right click on the
mailbox and grant rights that way. At least that's the way I've been doing
it. Works fine then.
-Original Message-
From: David Prowak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 4:57 PM
To: Exchange
use this with an hourly export of the GAL and we reject around 7000 pieces
of mail a week to random/old addresses.
regards,
Paul
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm
Got a question guys..
Running AD, and exchange 5.5. Looking to remove WINS services from network,
will this affect exchange services in any way? Just being careful
Thanks,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08
just deployed two new W2K3 servers and deleted WINS. Running Exchange 5.5
- SP4. Two weeks and so far everything is just fine. Expect to upgrade to
Exchange 2003 in a week or two.
John Orban
System Administrator
The Country School
www.countryschool.org
-Original Message-
From: Paul
I put it on the same day it was released and didn't detect any problems. (E2000 in AD
env)
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 1:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MS03
I agree with checking with MS licensing rep however, I've never assumed that a license
to use Outlook was a license to use Office but quite the opposite.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday
I would guess so, if all they say is Access Denied it could be any reason,
but the DNS lists are a good place to start.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From
purely
because our netblock is known to be assigned to the UK.
Basically don't assume your mail is being refused because of something
you/your IP address has done.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
How did you hear about this (MS046)? I'm subscribed to MS's security bulletin service
but I haven't received anything from MS regarding this patch.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October
.
regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 October 2003 18:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Reply to Experts: Proposal INTAS Ref. Nr. 03-51-5890
But how can it come back almost instantly?
-Original Message-
From
What I'd do is check your IP at http://www.moensted.dk/spam, if nothing
shows there, you might simply be on their manual blocklist, in which case
short of asking them there's not much you can - their server, their rules
however flawed their thinking :-)
Paul
-Original Message-
From
Great, thanks, Andy!
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange archive
Try:
http://www.mail-archive.com/exchange%40ls.swynk.com
Server. Look at other warnings and/or errors associated with
this warning for more troubleshooting information.
!!!
Technet Ex2k Events/Errors Search suggest running mtacheck /rd /rp. I've
tried this and it runs with no errors, no problems found, makes no
difference.
Paul C
-Original
Hi,
Anyone know what the error below means - or what should be done about
it?
TIA
Paul Christopher
Event Type: Warning
Event Source: MSExchangeMTA
Event Category: Directory Access
Event ID: 9302
Date: 02/10/2003
Time: 12:05:19
User: N/A
Computer
AV product which I swear by. Ever since we installed
Trend we haven't had a virus outbreak.)
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New
Is there a way to change the hostname that Ex5.5 (SP4) sends as the
hostname when it opens a SMTP connection? I'm not talking about the
entire FQDN, but just the hostname portion of the FQDN.
Thanks
Paul Berquam
_
List posting
Keep an eye on the logs during the next online maintenance window for 1221
events for the private store and it'll show the white space that can be
re-used within the database.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto
If you're talking MS such as Excel, why not just turn on protection?
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Read Only Attachments
My understanding was that if you open any connection as https:// that any
authentication is encrypted even though the padlock doesn't appear until
they authenticate (or don't).
Are you sure that's not happening?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635
Well, I'm no expert but doing a netstat only shows a session active on
https, nothing at all on http, so I'd guess it's just the way IE shows
things..
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
thoughts (guillotining their fingers isn't an option).
regards,
Paul
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
Ditto from the United Kingdom
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 September 2003 23:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: A CHALLENGE to the List
I see the 10
Dan,
Hey, you run a tight ship then (65GB / 16,000+ mailboxes) ;-)
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Foerst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 September 2003 05:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re
Yeah,
I remember them in my mainframe days, we used them for our remote access.
Like'em, I thought they sold out.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 September 2003 22
from Outlook? How can I monitor this process?
TIA,
Paul Bendall
___
Operational Integrity eMessaging London
Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein
___
Tel: +44 20 747 52869
Mobile: +44 7989 706 881
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED
We run Exchange 5.5 on a HP SAN with our own DR solution. This is signed off
by Microsoft PSS. I believe MS support Exchange on a SAN but not a NAS.
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 September 2003 17:19
To: Exchange Discussions
We run Exchange 5.5 on an IBM SAN, no issues here. But you might want to
make sure that you have the right hardware behind it or performance will
suffer.
Paulie
-Original Message-
From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 12:19 PM
To: Exchange
From Wired.com (http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,60473,00.html):
VeriSign's controversial typo-squatting Site Finder service is about to be bypassed
by an emergency software patch to many of the Internet's backbone computers.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
but they appear to assume you want to recover the lot,
onto the original box (which is the scenario I'd taken into account).
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
That should be doable as I have a spare drive large enough to put in the
recovery server, I'm just a little surprised that ntbackup for Windows 2000
doesn't give the option of restoring either/or database?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378
Hey Guys
Running Exchange 5.5 SP4, on WIN2K server w/ SP3. When looking at my
Queues, I noticed that I've been getting a load of messages with no
originators? Maybe around 30 a day. Any ideas, suggestions on where
they're coming from? Any way to stop them?
Thanks,
Paulie
-Original
it simply recognizes Directory and Information Store objects,
you don't appear to be able to select which store you want to restore,
unless I'm misinterpreting something.
regards,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1918.html may be worth a look.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 September
Excuse my ignorance what is the vulnerability, do you have a Q article or
security update number from MS. When was the vulnerability reported.
TIA,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 September 2003 15:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
What about MDBVU32?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 September 2003 18:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 0 items, 7 unread
Thanks, but there is nothing in that folder. ESM reports 0 items. Tried
Exchange client anyway - it sees
Nope nothing on my network. Everything is running smooth so far.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 4:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Win2k SP 4 with Exchange 5.5
Does anyone else have this same setup and have you
As subject really, trialling it now on some of our servers and it looks
quite impressive for the cost (which isn't very much).
Anyone using it and have any good experiences or any horror stories using
it?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378
brave I might try SUS.
I appreciate any info you advice/info can offer - I appreciate it's OT but
most of here are professionals and do this for a job so the advice tends to
be good!
regards,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
patch
that increases the simultaneous connections/performance?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Sirius F. Crackhoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08
Hey Guys,
Does anyone know if you can change the SMTP banner for Exchange 5.5?
Thanks,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Adam Berns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails
Shift+Del does not work
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails
You don't.
Put a relay server in front of it that has this feature.
-Original Message-
From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
their host name. Thats what you are referring to yes?
I suspect most mail servers will not reject mail because of that.
You will need to use some sort of relay to accomplish that with 5.5 or as
Chris mentioned, I guess you could pay MCS to change it for you.
- Original Message -
From: Paul
as it is.
- Original Message -
From: Paul kondilys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:32 PM
Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails
I really don't have a problem with it actually...but you had to see this
one
e-mail admin
He started e
I believe 4460 is unassigned. However I think that Oracle's Portal server
users port 4460 for SSL.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 4:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Smtp ports - firewall
Its probably been doing
I second the LSoft recomendation.
Univ. of Cinci uses it and it's amazingly fast.
Like 10K messages delivered in 60 minutes.
We have webshield also installed on the box and god protect me, but it's all
running fine-:)
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
box that needed to be changed, or on DNS for
Active Directory?
Thanks
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: auto BCC'ing all messages * Exchange 5.5 *
That will only catch
1 - 100 of 827 matches
Mail list logo
