Sorry, all out. I have one hallelujah left though ...:-) It's nearly
Christmas!
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 December 2003 03:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Can I get an Amen!
Eric Fretz
L-3
up-to-date
with Microsoft patches too.
Trend just advised us that they are developing a new patch for this
virus/variation of a virus.
Plse be on the lookout for updates from your AV suppliers.
Regards
Sander
_
List posting FAQ
Morning All
The nasty fella is called: Worm_YAHA.AF and you need Trends pattern file
691 to pick it up.
Enjoy your weekend.
clearing the coffee cups and empty pizza boxes Sander
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar
Sent: 27 November 2003 01:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
You are looking in Explorer at your priv.edb with exchange running or
stopped? Stop exchange and see the real file size.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 November 2003 08:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information Store Size
That is a valid point as your streaming file does form part of that
store. Dismounting the store should be enough to get the correct size.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 November 2003 09:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
I also get way more then a Gig a minute when I backup using a custom
script pointing to Dev0, restores are a bit of a problem though
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 August 2003 10:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup
and how much mail and public folders are you talking about?
Regards,
Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE
Sysadmin Manager
Korbi.net
-Original Message-
From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 July 2003 01:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange upgrade
Hi guys
2000 upgrade properly
then Exchange 5.5. Rather make the laptop a NT4.0 BDC so that you have a
set of NT4.0 user accounts for worst case scenario. I take it you have
no test environment to test and document your move on.
Regards,
Sander
-Original Message-
From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL
Originator means it's an NDR. Are you seeing a lot of activity? Mail
relay? Virus spoofing attack perhaps?
Regards,
Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE
Sysadmin Manager
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 July 2003 03:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I wouldn't worry too much about it, unless volumes increase to thousands
per day:-) You should get copies of mail delivery attempts in your
administrator box. You can see which users don't or no longer exist on
your system.
Regards,
Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE
Sysadmin Manager
life experience with this product? Any views? There doesn't
appear to be much info on the actual inner workings of the product, nor
any disaster recovery.
Regards,
Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE
Sysadmin Manager
Korbi.net
object in the forest. As a
result, cross-domain object references in that domain will not be
updated and a warning to that effect will be logged on that DC's event
log.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 June 2003 05:57 PM
To: Exchange
Do you want to have both .com and .loc as an email address, or only
.loc? One way would be with a smart host that could rewrite your .loc to
.com on outgoing mail.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 June 2003 02:13 PM
To: Exchange
Nothing may have changed on your administrative side, but something
surely changed on your user's side. Two people are editing the same
items on your server. Same job roles perhaps? New person taking over a
function from another person? I've seen this happen in a hand over
period.
Sander
a drive letter this will
work.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Jay Kulsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 March 2003 12:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: A Simple Question - Replacing a small drive in Exch 5.5
Thanks for replying. I am planning to do a full backup as well
Well done Seb! You obviously don't read much on this list.
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 February 2003 02:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Is this working
Test
uop Guildford IT
Tel:+44 1483 466107
E-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
I want the Tenor Unplugged version !
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 January 2003 03:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archives - Buy yours today.
All the Hummert posts have been purged. Expensive process.
-- Original Message
Here's one: Do any of your customers have Unix based email systems? Plain text will
work 100%
Regards,
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Tim Gowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 January 2003 10:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Justifying text-only Internet Mail
I'm about
Ah, he forgot to add the email addresses of the HR department to the Spam list.
Terminal error!
Regards,
Sander Van Butzelaar
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 January 2003 07:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using script to get header
I have an idea it was the antivirus software that wasn't stopped while
putting on SP4 that caused the failure in the first place (although he
doesn't state that there was AV on before)
Just a hunch ..:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
My vote goes with toast then..:-(. I know of no quick recovery if all those avenues
have been tried without success.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 December 2002 12:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: recover deleted mail items Exchange
I came across your address on the net??? Are you in sales or what? You
either subscribe to this list or you don't.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 December 2002 02:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Very OT - txt handling
Hi there,
I came
Haven't seen that behaviour before. The functionality definitely works
as we use it (mail to admin, sender and receiver). Maybe try
re-installing Scanmail. Your service packs up-to-date? No other problems
with mail going out, ie also getting stuck in the outbox?
Sander
-Original Message
Well yes, after that Australian disaster with sheep Sheila ...oh aussies
originally also came from England
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 December 2002 07:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Haiku Friday
Yep leave it to the British to
I doubt you'll even see the impact at all. No problem with it. For an
ASP customer I need to run Exchange 2000 and SQL 200 on one box, now
that is a baddie. Those two apps both like mucho resources. Not
impossible, but not first prise either.
Cheers
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Chris
Morning all
Weird feeling went the sun disappears for a couple of minutes...we just
had a full eclipse and it went pitch black.
Sander
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sander Van
Butzelaar
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Morning all
Weird feeling went the sun disappears for a couple of minutes...we just
had a full eclipse and it went pitch black.
Sander
Exchange is way above trivial things like solar eclipses etc ...-)
It didn't even blink.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 December 2002 09:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The lights went out..
A rare and phenomenal
I don't know Peter, moving all the mail to an Oracle box just doesn't do
it for me ..:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:PETER.SEITZ;cubic.com]
Sent: 06 November 2002 07:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'
.cshrc
short% more .cshrc
as a cheap near-line storage system..:-)
Regards
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:Andy.Webb;swinc.com]
Sent: 06 November 2002 06:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'
I think you'd benefit more from something like kvault that moved the
data
We are, we cover South Africa and some sub-Sahara African countries. You
don't want to know how many people they stick on a 64 k line on this
continent...:-) Bandwidth, oh bandwidth where art thou...
Sander
Korbi.net
-Original Message-
From: Henley, John K (Johnny), METRO
Logic would dictate that it can, otherwise you would need a dedicated
server for that only. That sounds silly. I have however not tested this
in real life.
frantically looking in some documentation Sander
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:jwkelley;qualcomm.com]
Sent: 06
I have a couple of users who do the same thing. They don't want to
delete old mail (for whatever reason) and I can't keep extending their
mailbox sizes. So they move to PST. Be aware of the risks here! Make a
periodic backup of that PST as hard drives are prone to failure.
Sander
-Original
the user a bit of slack here David.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com]
Sent: 06 November 2002 01:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'
No, just inform them of the 'No PST Backup' policy.
I don't back up
What exactly do you mean by edit containers and what version of
Exchange are you running.
Regards
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Magalhaes [mailto:CarlosM;trencor.net]
Sent: 25 October 2002 12:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Permissions
Hi there all,
Is there a way I
users part of the security group.
Each one of those users would need to run Exchange Admin.
I really wouldn't want so many people editing my exchange environment,
but your business requirements may vary.
Regards
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Magalhaes [mailto:CarlosM
You basically want to delegate specific tasks down to certain users.
Sure, in a larger organisation, that makes perfect sense (as long as
those delegates know what they are doing)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Magalhaes [mailto:CarlosM;trencor.net]
Sent: 25 October 2002 12:59
May I recommend the following literature by Dale Carnegie..:-)
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0671723650/qid=1035442040/
sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/102-6532048-4852914?v=glance
(Link wraps)
Cheers
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net
Lol!
Oh, by the way, for more info on your Goatse follow the link below. But
you really shouldn't have posted this to the list. You could have send
it direct if you feel that strong about it.
http://www.dangerz.net/gatasa/article.shtml
Anyway, we all live and learn.
Cheers
Sander
Waiting for a time out perhaps?
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 October 2002 03:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP retry queues
Hey all. I am looking for someone who is smarter than me :) to explain
to me why Exchange 2000
Lol!
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 October 2002 11:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Exchange Server
If you were referring to me, I'll show you my willy...
Regards
_MR._ Andrea Coppini
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy I.
MSDN is your friend! (until you actually find that the specific thing
you need to know how to get around isn't in there...:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 September 2002 09:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: support
For one, you would lose your single instance. Not sure how important
this is for you.
M pie, it's nearly lunch time here...
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 September 2002 11:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADC vs. Exmerge
Hi
objections against ADC? I moved my organization (three
different sites) over from NT4.0 with Exchange 5.5 to Windows 2000 with
Exchange 2000. I got to know the ADSI editor pretty well after that, but
hey it worked in the end ...:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL
...:-)).
Regards
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 September 2002 06:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: urgent backup problem
In a similar situation, I installed Exchange admin on a Win 2000 machine
with a large
Lol, thanks
Sander
SysAdmin Manager
Korbitec Korbi.net
-Original Message-
From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 September 2002 01:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: urgent backup problem
Sander - I only say this because the disk is non-removable, so
Well for one, who is going to accept 15MB on the incoming side? I
definitely wouldn't. Without attachments 15MB is a hell of a lot of
typing ..:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 September 2002 11:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Maybe Swink has been bought out by the Post Office:-)
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 September 2002 01:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
Well, I sent it on Friday
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
Without being funny, read the material available on Microsoft's site
about Exchange 5.5 and Exchange 2000 and test, test, test.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 August 2002 08:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Migrating from 5.5 to 2000
I
Sander
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Chris
CDOLive has code for Exchange 5.5 for this, called Attachement
Extraction Folder Script. Needless to say Exchange 2000 is somewhat
different...:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 August 2002 04:24
To: Exchange Discussions
I subscribe to this one, does that qualify? ...:-)
Happy searching!
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 August 2002 03:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Listserve Recommendations
So it seems I'm soliciting opinions on list serve software
This has been discussed before (all the different types of spam
filtering) and I think one of the drawbacks from this type anti-spam was
that other people decide for you what is spam.
Cheers
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 August
What about the aditional overhead (cost) of Windows 2000 server as he
will need an AD. I would say rather stick with NT4.0 and Exchange 5.5
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Ragar, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 August 2002 05:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
Correct, I modify the email domain name and exchange accepts for that
new domain.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Reetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 August 2002 04:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Changing Reply To address
a header rewrite per domain? So
Hey, if I can get that type of speed out of it, it can be a Persian for
all I care...:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 August 2002 10:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related
What sort of cat? Domestic shorthair
the correct accounts across.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 August 2002 09:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Re: Moving Exchange from Small Business Server
Mark,
Are you not able to do the 'move server' method (IE just like a restore
set
up
It's Windows 2000 without the AD ...:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 August 2002 10:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NT2000 SP3 with Exchange 2000 SP3
pedant
What's NT2000?
/pedant
Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
I think it's the unique SID of the account that is the problem on the
new box. I'm sure if you could synchronize the SID's you would be well
away. I'm not sure if Microsoft would approve of this though.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01
So how did you find this David? ...:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 04:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: W2k Sp3 is out
Nothing mentioned on the Microsoft pages, but
http://download.microsoft.com/download
Hehehe, we cheated, we put all our stuff in a UUNET Data Centre. I have
no sleepless nights about UPS or temperature:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 01:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related
We
Lol! You can't have everything you know
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 01:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related
and sleepless nights about bankruptcy?
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van
Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related
no way, I'm way to much of a control freak for that. I wanted the
systems
to page our on call pager 1st, but was voted down by all the others
involved. What type of SLA do you have with UUNET?
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar
into a faster
port, preferably one that is closer to the Internet? :0
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 8:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related
Oh but I'm a control freak too! We're in the same
if I had that kind of setup, I would
probably
use it as well.
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 8:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related
Oh but I'm a control freak too! We're in the same
I don't think that there is something like that coded in, but you could
probably use a script.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Vas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 July 2002 10:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: question about attachments
Dear All
Just a quick question
Fair enough, he did however say he had 25 users:-) He would need to
keep the 16 GB limit in mind. Curbing the attachments will help to
stretch the amount of actual mail you can have.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: John Steniger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 July 2002 03:40
in the properties and off you go. I'm trying to
replicate the problem on my test environment, but I thought I'd ask if
anybody has ever run into anything like this before.
Thanks
Sander
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
Thanks! That solved the Public Folder send as, but not the
Distribution List (which was visible).
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 July 2002 11:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Send As
You did unhide the PF, do you
Thanks. I actually was on this site this morning, but must have missed
this article.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 July 2002 01:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Send As
More info on this can be found at
http
Make sure you have a ptr record for your mail server in your DNS.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Olivier de Heer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 July 2002 08:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Fix reverse DNS (?)
Dear All,
Some of our customers do receive the following NDR
search...:-)
My question is: How to get rid of those items in the EDB file. A
consistency check says the file is consistent. Any answers welcome, even
if you feel I must research more, that's great too, but plse point me in
the right direction.
Regards
Sander
Thank you Jeffrey
I guessed that it were valid pointers pointing to a missing item, just
didn't know how to get rid of them. Will run this tonight, as I can't
take the production system down during the day.
Regards
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL
not open. We have come to terms with that and now just
want to clean up the pointers that have no entries in the new STM file.
Hence Jeff's recommendation to run isinteg against the EDB file, rather
than to go back in time with a restore.
Tks
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto
How nice, messaging support according to this OOF from Colin Camilleri.
I hope Alan knows what's coming his way!...:-)
Hi,
I am no longer working for HP. Please contact Alan Fraser for any Mail
and Messaging issues.
thanks and regards,
Colin
How much you are needed? How much work you really need to do or how many
$$$'s they think you are worth:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 June 2002 09:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange engineer needed!!!
how much
Stuur drop asb!...:-)
Sander - Kaapstad
-Original Message-
From: Willigen, Maarten van [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 June 2002 12:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
I am in Amsterdam Holland
Maarten
-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto
Cape Town - South Africa, here the leased lines change into jungle beat
concerts once you are outside the city. One bang is a 0 and two bangs a
1. You need a keen ear and a fast hand to type.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 June 2002
searched on -1811 but I do not appear to see anything on the Technet
site that helps me on from here. Can one creatre a blank stm file? I
tried it but no joy.
Has anybody got any suggestions, apart from calling PPS, which I will do
if I can't get this resolved soon.
Thanks
Sander
Thank you Jeffrey!!
It repaired some corruption in the tables and created a new stm file.
Whenever you are in Cape Town, the first couple of beers are on my tap!
Tks
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 10:34
To: Exchange
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: STM Question
Did you lose any mail?
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:52 AM
Ok, and since the Store was not mounted, no new content could be added.
I think I was lucky and that wasn't by design ...:-) Live and learn!
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 03:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: STM Question
September... any takers yes, no...Sold to the gent with the funny
hat...Oh, sorry mam...
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 May 2002 02:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: any news on sp3?
July
-Original Message-
From: Stephen
Without sounding too nasty:Why do people care when it comes out? Unless
you have a serious problem and than you should talk to PPS anyway
climbing off my soap box. Sander
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 April 2002 09:07
To: Exchange Discussions
the biggest car, fastest computer
and
the newest service packs.
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
--
- Original Message -
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
May they need to be paid?
-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 April 2002 03:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: iis 5
upgrade isp services.. is there a wizard for that ? :-}
-Original Message-
From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL
I like keeping Exchange logs at least until I run a full backup ...:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 April 2002 09:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: best practice
Hi,
looking for some advice on what to do with exchange logs
Will depend on your local environment. Possible - yes. Acceptable -
depends. I prefer a Raid set up, but again for 5 users IDE will do etc
etc.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: wade robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 April 2002 01:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Human Electric? Cool, so the Matrix is true! Humans running on
electricity sorry got carried away here. So what was the question
again?
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Adebayo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
So what happens to the new emails when the real server is down, does the
test server except them? This would result in a loss of emails when the
real server comes back onb I agree with Louis here, get the test
server on a different physical network.
Sander
-Original Message
Yep, make the original incoming address a D/L and one recipient of the
D/L is a contact (you guessed itit, it will be the email address of your
mdeamon, so it will get a copy of the incoming email)
Have fun
Sander Van Butzelaar, MCSA MCSE
Administrator
KORBI.NET
http://www.korbi.net
Never let
They only way Exchange is going to forward anything is through SMTP. So
what do you mean by locally? You do not need an internet presence to be
a mail server, one can relay/Pat/Nat whatever you want. I take it the
two servers can talk TCP/IP to each other?
Sander
-Original Message-
From
on the Exchange box.
7. Fish Taco's on Friday?
8. Have a beer.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Responder
Definitely.
To make it clear.
Create a User [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Create
Ah Barry, but a little bit further it says:
Do not withhold good from those to whom it is due, when it is in your
power to do so. Proverbs 3:27
So let the man have his messages, I think they are good:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
LOL! (s'pose that means I'm in, otherwise I would be out, right?)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange digest: March 07, 2002
I'll be IN the office all next week
Sander Van Butzelaar, MCSA MCSE
Administrator
KORBI.NET
http://www.korbi.net
Never let a human do the work of a machine - The Matrix
-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: An Active/Active
netbios-ns 137/tcpnbname #NETBIOS Name Service
netbios-ns 137/udpnbname #NETBIOS Name Service
137/UDP -- NetBIOS Name Server
The network basic input/output system (NetBIOS) Name Server (NBNS)
protocol, which is part of the NetBIOS over TCP/IP (NetBT) family of
protocols,
I got it from our TAM a while back when I was looking for it, so I
presume you would contact your local PPS and they will post it to you.
All documentation points to the resource kit for Exchange 2000, but I
have never been able to find it in there-(
Sander
-Original Message-
From
In Exchange 2000 you can limit the number of recipients on the
Properties/Messages page of your virtual SMTP connector. That would mean
the total number of recipients per message, not per TO: and per CC:
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
space.
Sander
Oh I nearly forgot - MCSE NT4 MCSE Windows 2000 ...:-)
-Original Message-
From: Sakti Chakravarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 70-224 Study Materials
Well if I were posting questions on the site I
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
