Ah, you need someone to rescue you from AOL?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Christine Lani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 8:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: exchange engineer needed
I am looking for a 2nd to 3rd level exchange
Well if you're going in with just 3 years experience, it is long term.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 1:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Job Opening Washington DC for Exchange Design
Ludington is beautiful. We spent a weekend there last Thanksgiving. It was
a great weekend retreat.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: WALMART
I can understand
Hmm, yes. Anyone, please spill all the details about their infrastructure.
Juuust curious.
:-)
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 June 2002 09:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Wal-Mart
Anyone here working or has worked for Wal-Mart
I found the thread! It was YOU who asked the question at the time. Imagine
that.
Here's an example response from Ryan at the time:
RE: password changing
From: Ryan Malayter
Subject: RE: password changing
When you use OWA, the user will be prompted for the password change. With
POP3, you probably will need to write your own code. I think this was
covered in the list a few months ago. There was someone who was trying to
do this for POP3 users, although I don't remember who posted it.
Serdar
Repeated blows to the head with a fairly large hammer also works.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to prevent end users from using Outlook personal folders
If you have limited budget, spend your extra cash on memory.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Cooke, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 12:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hardware Question
All,
Our company is buying a new Exchange server. At
Both yahoo and hotmail used to be great tools. Now, it's a hassle to
maintain an account with them.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Ewins, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: slightly OT - Outlook and
Sounds like you got some corrupt appointments in the calendar. What happens
when you purge the calendar folder (using export, ExMerge or something like
that)?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Perez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 6:57 AM
To:
Hey! Some of us are watching those from tape, so don't spoil it! That
said, the score for England vs Argentina was
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 5:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: It's OT time
Search the archives for catch-all mailbox
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Catch all email sent to my company address
How can I forward all email sent to non-existent
I think the options for mailbox access:
1.VPN (most secure)
2.SSL to internal OWA
3.SSL to OWA in DMZ (secure enough, but forces you to allow directory
authentication traffic through your firewall)
4.OWA in DMZ over port 80 (what are you, nuts?)
5.MAPI over Internet (suicidal)
For SMTP
An offline defrag is the last thing you want to do if you suspect your
database has corruption in it. If you suspect corruption, build another
server, move your data to that and then figure out what caused the
corruption in the first place. When you run a database utility against a db
that is
This is BS. If you are dealing with confidential information, you treat it
as such. Unless encrypted, e-mail is transmitted over the Internet in clear
text. You don't mail confidential documents in transparent envelopes, do
you? If you can't risk the viewing of the information by unintended
Humor us. Did you even think about searching the archives or lookgin at the
FAQ?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 3:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How to add a disclaimer on outgoing emails?
Hi, I'm trying
FAQ FAQ FAQ FAQ FAQ FAQ FAQ FAQ FAQ
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 7:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Spam Filtering- How?
We are using Exchange 5.5 with latest service pack. I have been asked to
Unfortunately you can only get that from PSS and only if you're experiencing
a specific problem. AFAIK, that utility was not written as a
general-purpose tool but more for detecting a specific problem [1].
Serdar Soysal
[1] Don't ask me what that specific problem is. I don't know.
The reasons why I don't do it are:
1. It's unnecessary.
2. I have a life.
3. Unnecessary downtime is frowned upon in a 24x7 shop.
4. I don't need to justify my existence by doing useless administrative
work.
It's like disassembling your car's axles and clean your shocks every weekend
as
So you want them to be able to create new items in that folder but not be
able to create new items in it. I can see the challenge.
The only thing I can think of is to use a custom post form for that pf,
publish it in that pf and then restrict the pf to accept only that specific
form.
There may be no drag/drop accidents but those users are still accident
prone. Don't leave metal objects near toasters in your lunchroom.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Manning, Tammie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
If it's that sensitive, shut down your exchange servers and run ISSCAN.
Reprimand the user. Cut off his index finger or something.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights...
Lot of people think Argentina will get this one.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
Off celebrating
Drop your hardware vendor. Been running my databases on RAID5's on Ed
Crowley's employer's fine line of servers and NEVER EVER had an issue.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
What is it that you are trying to track exactly? Logons? Sent/Received
mails?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 7:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re Mailbox Access
Hi all,
I need to keep a close
Nope, that's not it. It would go without the brackets as well. His problem
is he needs to change the relay settings in IMS to allow relaying.
Ed, be careful not to make yourself an open relay if this host is
communicating directly to the Internet.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
Use IP addresses for forwarding, not names.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMC will not start
Windows 2000 Server
Exchange 5.5 Sp3
Our headquaters recently
If the money that they'll be saving in licensing costs is more than the sum
of the costs of:
1. Purchasing/licensing new software
2. Purchasing support for the new software
3. Purchasing/upgrading/changing hardware (if necessary)
4. Training/Replacing the entire IT staff
5. Training all of the
That's because this list has some members with behavioral problems that can
seldom be solved by technological solutions [1].
Serdar Soysal
[1] Hi Ed.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
So, don't spam. If you're not spamming, then what are you doing?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: help
help !!!
my firewall blocks when sending a mailmerge !!!
What if the pf is larger than 2GB? I suppose using multiple PSTs is an
option.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 1:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Moving Public Folders from E5.5
Export to
SpamMan? I think he deserved what he got.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Fw: NAV Corporate Ed. ate my e00 log
From the newsgroups. Need we say more, about scanning
I sincerely hope that your legal department agrees with the 30 day tape
retention. A good lawyer once told me that any attorney will have a field
day at court if your e-mail retention period did not match your printed
document retention period. I tend to agree with that.
Serdar Soysal
That's as bad as taking technology advice from marketing.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archive
What does your Legal department say? Or do they take the lead
That's the initiation ritual for becoming a successful messaging
administrator. Are you really ready to take the test?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 01:03 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
We evaluated Omtool, Rightfax and a bunch of others. Rightfax seemed to be
the winner at the time. However, for reasons that I do not wish to (or need
to) disclose the budget was cut and we're stuck with FACSys. The bottom
line is pretty much anything you get will be better than FACSys.
What do you mean by overdue? Are you talking about Tasks or flagged
messages, or both? Either way, you probably will have to hire a consultant
to write some custom code for you.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Eric Jenniskens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May
It is a candy bar.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 5:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b
eing used
What is Scanmail and what is it
If you have clients using AOL's browser to connect to your servers, you MUST
have a test box running the same configuration. Otherwise, all of your
suggestions are shots in the dark.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
You may not have liked the suggestions yesterday, but the answer is still
the same. Read up:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/backuprestore.a
sp
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002
You don't need to use the service account. The account needs to have user
permissions on the Recipients container, that's it.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Jutla, Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
It is a candy bar.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Group Mail
Pardon me Chris, but what does fsck mean? I am new to this list and
Exchange.
I checked the
This horse was beaten to death, revived and beaten to death again. Archives
are your best friend. Basically the summary of all advice given on the
subject is: the best limits are those that accommodate your business needs.
EP II was good. It's not Harry Potter in space like the first one.
Make sure that the data that is to be recovered is more valuable to business
than the cost of recovery before proceeding. Digest all the info in the
fine link Mr.David provided while management is chewing on that.
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
The original question (that was violently snipped) asked about both content
and virus scanning (hence the subject line Virus/Spam filtering). It is
true that TrendMicro is very good on the virus scanning side, its eManager
plug-in is just a mediocre content filter. For virus scanning, Sybari's
He just likes the idea of pain.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exch2k server move
You lost me
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
The hardware can be different. You just need the same O/S and Exchange
level (version, sp etc). The only thing that might go wrong in your case is
that the previous system had a multiprocessor HAL, and the new one will be
single proc HAL.
Obviously, you'll need the same server name, site
M: drive just allows access to your Exchange server via the file system
(i.e. Windows Explorer). Although it may have some applications, I've never
heard of anyone using it extensively. You definitely can live without it.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham
Doh!
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:
WELL SUPRPRISE SURPRISE GUYS. I have M: and there are some reports that
I can forward you .. I mean my
I guess he meant to send it to the other exchange list.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TO ALL THE GIRLS I'VE LOVED BEFORE
Are you on crack?
-Original
The following are two good products for gateway level content filtering.
MIMESweeper from ClearSwift www.clearswift.com
Praetor from Computer Mail Services www.cmsconnect.com
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002
Glad to hear that your problem is being resolved.
Here is some good reading on the -1018 errors.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q314917
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:51 AM
To:
If one of them is forwarding mail to the other, it is possible that the same
message caused both engines to fail. I would bump up the diagnostics
logging on IMS on both boxes and see if anything gets caught in the event
logs.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson
You're not running Mailbox Manager against that calendar by any chance are
you?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Calendar Problems
Perhaps an obvious question:
One user or multiple users?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus Attack ??
Hi
Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate
mail to the user
How about using a public folder for your support mailbox?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 5:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Creating rule based on a second mailbox
Good day,
I am running exchange server
What happened prior to this problem starting? Any service pack upgrades
etc? Take a look at Q185573 to see if it rings a bell.
Either you have a corrupt db and it was backed up that way, or there is
something messed up with the machine you're restoring to. Either way, you
may want to call
You probably have a corrupt calendar entry in there. Set up a profile for
this conference room, open the PST, switch to By Category or By Recurrence
view and copy only the NON-RECURRING meetings back into the original
calendar. Then you can start looking for the culprit recurring meeting [1].
Read this:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/backuprestore.a
sp
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Test Disaster Recovery
Is there
What service pack level are you using? Check to see if this happens when
someone does a reply-to-all to a message in their Sent Items folder.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Kumar Pillai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 6:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Talk to your new ISP and see if they have any restrictions on message sizes.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Problems with emails on Exchange 5.5
We did a couple of
What on earth are you talking about? Chris simply pointed Frank to the FAQ,
he said nothing about renaming a BDC. Besides, since when is it impossible
to rename a BDC? Why don't you do a search on Technet before you spit
something out?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Muqeem
I wonder how the product behaves when you perform a restore or run a utility
like ESEUTIL. How about virus scanners etc. etc.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Try UUENCODE. You can set that in Message Options. If that works you can
set the same thing on the server for that domain.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: mobile
Click on the Options button when you're sending the message, and there is a
combo box for encoding. The default value for it is Auto-Select, but you
can change it.
However, if you're encrypting stuff, it is possible that the receiving end
can't decrypt it.
Serdar Soysal
-Original
This is like giving them a desk and telling them not to ever use the
drawers.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Allen Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 Private Store Permissions
I'm looking
Leave Gary alone. He's been a good resource to a lot of people.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 10:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: URGENT DISASTER RECOVERY
Dear Slinger,
We should not make fun
The only thing I would add to this is use good quality hardware. If you
have good quality hardware and are proactive in monitoring the health of
your hardware along with all the other recommendations in the fine link that
Andy provided, you'll be ok.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
Can he hit those public folders from a windows based PC or OWA?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Macintosh Denied Access to Public Folders
I have one insert explitive of
I doubt it. I would suspect they are stored in the Events_Config folder
along with the script. They do overwrite after a certain size, but I don't
know exactly what that limit is.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May
Although that may be the most practical solution, it may be required for a
specific business need (like having a cool looking computer on the front
desk etc.)
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:35 PM
To:
If you're thinking about deploying content filtering software you must have
one of the following:
1. 1-2 hours a day of free time
2. Enough budget to hire a part-time employee
The content filtering product is only as good as how much time you spend
refining your rules. Very boring and shtty
Yes.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox size restrictions - in groups?
Thx.
Havent loaded up E2K yet...I'll assume by part of the thread that E2K could
do
When your server makes a connection, it sends the entire command and
carriage return (that is HELOCR) in a single packet. When you make a
connection via Telnet and start keying in the command, the other server
receives each keystroke in a different packet.
It seems like the receiving server
If you don't run them prior to the Exchange setup, they do run automatically
in the background. That's probably why your Exchange install took such a
long time. In larger forests where you have multiple domains/trees, it is a
better idea to run forestprep and wait a while until schema changes
No, just wait 2 hours. Or do the registry hack that is documented in the
Exchange 5.5 FAQ item 3.46.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changed the primary
There is a calendar reminder script in the sample code library of
cdolive.com. You can tweak that to your needs.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Reminder question
Put it on a ZIP drive.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Re Personal Mail Archiving
That won't work - CD's are read only. You need R/W access to the PST. You
Gotta love the StIcK
Best tool you can ever pick
For your daily kick
Serdar Soysal
PS: This haiku sucks, but I'm gonna post it anyways. Just to piss all of
you off.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 4:01 PM
To: Exchange
There you go. You're hired. Oops. Didn't mean to place a curse on you
like that. Sorry.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Cerification question
Well, I just
Whoa! Big word! Brain overload! I gotta go home and sleep this off.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 11:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Site Connectors in Ex.5.5
Unequivocally, no
Read what you wrote carefully. You are talking about impacting all of YOUR
users to eliminate the effects of another company being infected with a
virus. What will happen when the next KLEZ-like virus comes out and starts
spoofing the new email ids?
The only thing you can do is to inform
We all went to the bar and forgot to invite you.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Test to see if the list is live...
Haven't seen any activities today.
Andrew,
We've been pretty happy with ESE API as well.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Which is better trend with ESE API or AVAPI/MAPI For Exc
hang e 5.5
ESE
Discussions
Subject: RE: Test to see if the list is live...
Wer have all died and gone to MS Heaven!!! All praise Bill Gates...
Ophs!!! It sure is hot - perhaps it not Heaven after all...
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:37
Don't invite that speaker again.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Cerification question
There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to
That's because there are more moron IT recruiters out there than there are
qualified professionals.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Certification question
As an
Practical experience but he did have an MCSE. I thought that
at least showed that he wanted to learn. I interviewed a few others that had
more experience and never took the time to educate themselves in their
chosen craft.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
When you login to OWA, you essentially log on to the domain you supplied and
the logon occurs on the OWA server. The same domain policies apply, you do
lock your password after unsuccessful attempts. In your environment maybe
the logon does not occur at all. Something may be failing before a
Dale, listen to me
Exchange can handle itself
No reboot for you!
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Haiku Friday
Reboot Exchange box
Annually whether it
Wants me to or not
What are you trying to accomplish? Detect and delete these messages?
Create copies of them? Just to find out who has these evil messages?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Siegel, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 12:46 PM
To: Exchange
' on the entire Exchange store and
dump all msgs that meet criteria in a PST file or other portable readable
form.
Rich
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tools
What are you trying
In this organization every network problem is first reported as an Exchange
Issue. It's probably due to the fact that Outlook is the only network
application that EVERY client uses and it is usually the very first network
application that they open. That's probably the reason why the network
There are several links to the information you need on
www.microsoft.com/exchange
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 8:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 in an Exchange 5.5 org/site
Can you install
Funny, I found it rather quickly. Tools\Options\E-Mail Options
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 7:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 10 reg hack to stop RR's and NR's
NR's = Not Read.
Didn't have that specific problem, but this wouldn't be the first time
Compaq goofed up a NIC driver.
We had a similar issue with all of our brand new ML570s when we first
ordered them. The 4.90 NIC driver caused the server to just freeze under
very heavy load. We had to backdate the driver
it thanks to Dell's Open Manage Software stuffing up my RAID
array. What do you reckon?
Regards
Tony
Tony McCarthy
Systems Engineer
OSI Software
Auckland
New Zealand
Ph: 64 09 522 5909 (Auckland)
Fax: 64 09 522 5901 (Auckland)
Mob: 021 703035 (NZ)
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar
We use Tumbleweed as well. It's ok. Their support sucks though. I guess
they had some financial problems and laid off half of their support staff.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 8:44 AM
To: Exchange
Use pfadmin with the setacl command.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RE: permissions for public folders
LOL. I am not jumping right into this. I am just merely
Rebooting servers periodically is not a solution; it is just burying your
head in the sand and pretending everything is fine. If that is
acceptable/expected quality of service in your environment, then I guess
it's ok.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert
1 - 100 of 755 matches
Mail list logo
