Argumentum ad ignorantiam doesn't work. Pretty common (and simplistic)
logical fallacy, mostly used in supporting religious dogmatism. I
cannot prove that $deity doesn't exist, therefore $deity exists.
from somewhere else in this godforsaken thread
I must say that if you were to hire Ed Crowley
Nobody has ever proven that my bathtub isn't Cthulhu's summer retreat
either. Therefore we must accept that my bathtub is Cthulhu's summer
retreat.
This is the essence of the Argumentum ad Ignorantiam fallacy.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
The docs are on the CD, in the \docs directory, iirc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jean-Paul Natola
Posted At: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:48 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: symantec mail security
You scroll down until you find the links you told Arlo wouldn't work,
and click on them.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gregory Householder
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System
http://messageone.com/solutions/EMS.asp
They had a trial by fire of that type of scenario with the recent
blackout and hurricane, I guess. Maybe they have customer referrals of
people who actually had the disaster.
Also, I hear that they include Chris Scharff's cell phone number in
every box.
-Original Message-
From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ ]
While I would love to not have the spam traffic hit my
network at all, the only effective way to do that is with the
blacklists in blocking mode.
That is absolutely not true. Utterly false. They are the state
Look people, he's out of the comp copies of his book. Either ping Greg offline, or go
buy the darned book. It's only twelve bucks US$!
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0595289703
-tom
[ various me too responses snipped]
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler
telnet exmail.macombisd.org 25 gives you:
220 **0*2***
*22*200***2*00*0***0*00
You first have a question for Macomb ISD's PIX administrator. First order of
business: turn off the stupid Mailguard feature.
no
What is in the bounce message now that you've disabled the Stupid Mailguard feature?
What antispam/antivirus software do you have in there, and what sort of traffic is it
configured to dump?
-tom
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At:
I'd probably add a new recipient policy. I thoroughly enjoy the results I achieve by
never touching the default one. Especially never changing the default SMTP domain on
the default recipient policy. (this may be one of those superstition things, of
course)
-tom
-Original Message-
oh yeesh. is it thursday again already?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:00 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: All .COM / .NET domain names now exist
Subject: RE: All .COM / .NET domain names now
Veritas NetBackup can be fully controlled via CLI.
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 9:47 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Brick Level Backup
Subject: RE: Brick Level Backup
We are being
I use Listserv also, and I'm very happy with the product. The support is
simply excellent, also.
How much is outsourcing costing you? If money's tight and you want a
product that's got a decent installed base, look at Majordomo or Mailman
for the *n?x platforms.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/exchange2000/maintain/optimize/e2kfront.asp
Note: User mailboxes cannot be stored on the front-end server.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Megginson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 8:33 PM
Posted
http://www.ontrack.com/powercontrols/ will do this, iirc.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 4:30 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: NTBackup of Exchange * Need Restore Options *
Subject:
I dunno how much you're paying for MessageLabs' service, but it's pretty much a
customized front end for the open-source SpamAssassin. The only benefit I can see
over a stock Postfix/Sendmail gateway using Spamassassin, perhaps with MailScanner or
amavisd or Anomy Sanitizer for some more
Which begs an analysis of your .sig line, eh?
-tom
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence, Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, August 25, 2003 2:34 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Sobig.F alert
Subject: RE: Sobig.F alert
That is actually
And a quick glance shows that state.gov's email passes through (something generic),
sendmail, and Trend InterScan Viruswall before being delivered to an Exchange 5.5 box.
The latter two, and presumably the former one, are all easily configurable to block
based on any number of criteria,
Yeah, it lets you do a HELO, but then on the MAIL FROM: it goes 550.
I haven't tried all their servers (they do round-robin DNS on their MX records)
because I'm lazy and it's not my problem. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Mitch Lawrence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday,
Could all you folks with the misconfigured AV servers please disable auto-replying to
the spoofed FROM: lines in the latest generation of viruses? Jeez. It's worse than
the stupid virus. The virus gets dumped and nobody ever sees it, but the NDRs and
virus alerts go to people who didn't send
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 15:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Antivirus notifications
Could all you folks with the misconfigured AV servers please
disable auto-replying to the spoofed FROM: lines in the
latest
Sure they do. They've had it for a few hours.
http://www.sarc.com/avcenter/defs.download.html
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:42 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Heads up on a new virus
Find anything good here? Interesting augmentation, if you don't do business with the
target country...
http://blackholes.us/
-Original Message-
From: Greg Marr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, June 26, 2003 9:03 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation:
Because you made a policy that actually applied to EVERY single
recipient that told it to do that. Any new policy you make will be
assigned a higher priority than your default policy, and will overwrite
it for the recipients that the query that it's based upon (General
screen, Modify, Find Now)
The recipient policy doesn't have to apply to anybody (much less everybody) - they
just need to BE there. Make a recipient policy that applies to nobody that has all
those domains. Get rid of the connector. Problem solved. They'll bounce properly at
that point.
-Original Message-
about this?
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 2:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
What are white space, and inherent and well-documented
inaccuracies in reported mailbox sizes, Alex?
I'll take Sino-Korean Open Relays
I forward all my virus notifications to Roger.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:43 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Virus Notifications to Sender?
Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
I've used BulkAddFromExcel, and it works great with users. Maybe
BulkContactsFromExcel will do what you're looking for.
http://www.cdolive.net/download/
-tom
-Original Message-
From: Greg Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:11 AM
Posted To: MSExchange
What are white space, and inherent and well-documented inaccuracies in reported
mailbox sizes, Alex?
I'll take Sino-Korean Open Relays for $500, Alex.
-tom
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:50 PM
Posted To: MSExchange
an SMTP server for
that.
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 2:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
What are white space, and inherent and well-documented inaccuracies in
reported mailbox sizes, Alex?
I'll take Sino-Korean Open Relays
You mean this?
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup.htm
-Original Message-
From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 1:26 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Allow access to attachments
Subject: Allow access to attachments
Grrr.
Why would a company who sends me so much SPAM sell a product called SpamSucks!?
Especially spam trying to sell me a product called SpamSucks! And sent with a
throw-away account at juno.com as a reply-to address, yet sent through a spamming
firm's (roving.com) servers... yeesh. How many more
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=262054
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:37 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Argh login denied
Subject: Argh login denied
I'm looking this up as
Yes.
More information available when you say what version of Exchange you use.
-Original Message-
From: Santhosh, H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:47 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: OWA config
Subject: OWA config
Hi
Just wanted to
config
exchange 5.5 sir
Santhosh.H
Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA config
Yes.
More information available when you say what version of Exchange
Assuming zero whitespace, you have roughly a 9.5 gig priv store. It's roughly additive.
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:28 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Exchange 2000 Standard Store Limits
I think I'm either misunderstanding you, or you're misunderstanding
NTBackup2000 or whatever we're calling it.
If you want to back up SystemState and drive C: and E: but exclude
C:\winnt\system32 and e:\foo\bar you can just edit your *.bks file and
make sure it says
C:
C:\winnt\system32\
Consolidate rules. (If this or this or this or this, move to Folder A
is about 1/3 the size of four separate rules)
Use mail-enabled public folders or resource mailboxes for alerts,
discussion lists, recurring emails.
Delete old rules that aren't being used any more.
-Original Message-
Well, then, I'd expect you'd have several issues with your Exchange
server. You may want to format your C: drive in a lab environment to be
sure, though. It's hard to tell.
-Original Message-
From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, February 06, 2003 9:41 PM
I agree with you, to an extent. However, I believe the accountability lapse in our
profession is because of the paucity of meaningful credentials. An attorney has to
pass the bar, and then (potentially) get board-certified in his or her specialty.
Same with medical doctors. Same with
http://tinyurl.com/5gi1
Strangely enough, it was the FIRST LINK when I typed the word uninstall into the
(strangely enough) knowledge base at (strangely enough) Symantec. I sometimes look in
these crazy places that nobody else would think of. I'm a maverick like that.
-Original
What happened when you went to http://www.google.com and typed in [bulk add users nt]
ENTER?
-Original Message-
From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:35 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: USER BATCH PROGRAM FOR NT
HP is um. Wrong.
-Original Message-
From: Microsoft Exchange List Server
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:23 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Ntbackup - msx2000
Subject: Ntbackup - msx2000
MSX2000+SP3
1 forest
1 MSX organization
HI
Probably not, no. But if you're willing to set up a second box, there
are lots of linux ones, or you could use mercury32 for Win32 OS's.
http://www.pmail.com/whatsnew/new_m32.htm
http://www.slipstick.com/exs/lists.htm
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL
Have I mentioned Mercury32? Oh wait, yes I have. I guess web beacons
and adverts are preferable?
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:09 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Free Mailing List
Erm... If you only filter hatemail / inappropriate language / spam /
viruses on the gateway, your internal employees can then send hatemail /
inappropriate language / spam / viruses. Hence the Exchange store
product and the separate gateway product. Use the gateway to keep the
junk from the
Which part of the FAQ isn't clear, or doesn't go in-depth enough for you? Which part
of the help files aren't clear, or don't go in-depth enough for you?
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/planning/55/OutlookWebaccess.asp
Honestly, looking over your posting history, I don't believe you
For Exchange 2000:
http://autoaccept-sink.sourceforge.net/
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, January 02, 2003 1:17 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: CONFERENCE ROOMS
Subject: RE: CONFERENCE ROOMS
Try the Auto Accept
of the original one.
Thanks for all of your help so far,
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:41 PM
Subject: RE: Help with creating a GAL
First off, if you're going to insist on doing
Yeah. It tells you when it's improperly configured so you can hire someone to fix it,
and annotate it on your network/email administrator's performance review.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:42 AM
Posted To:
In that case look on the properties of the mailbox store. Database tab, maintenance
interval.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:11 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Online Defragmentation
First off, if you're going to insist on doing it this way (which I hope
you don't) you're going to want to do use the distinguished name of the
group:
Group Membership Is Exactly
cn=groupname,ou=OUname,dc=anderson,dc=net.
Groups are calculated entities, and they don't work quite the way that
Jim,
Phytoceutica is a big company that makes really complex medicine-thingies. You have
access to brilliant lawyers. WTF are you talking to a bunch of techno-weenies for?
Print out your AUP and go walk into your general counsel's office.
-tom
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil
If you feel like writing an event script, yeah. Use Outlook.
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, December 05, 2002 8:13 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Departed Employee Mail
Subject: Departed Employee Mail
E2K/W2K.
Please refer to the FAQ listed in the footer of this and every message.
-Original Message-
From: Jeffery Caudill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:42 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: eseutil
Subject: eoo.log files
My exchange server
Our General Counsel thinks they're silly. Off the record.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:14 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Disclaimers
Subject: RE: Disclaimers
Excuse me, I'm not sure this is
Ooh! Ooh! Mr. Kotter, Ooh! Ooh!
http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
-Original Message-
From: Mark Dewell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:03 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Disclaimers
Subject: Disclaimers
A
To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: eseutil
Subject: RE: eoo.log files
I have been to these. They say that the file will delete after a backup. the server
is backed up every night, and the files are not deleting like they are suppose to.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto
Yeah? So how does it get associated/executed?
-Original Message-
From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:21 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: attachments+virus
Subject: RE: attachments+virus
I got this announcement from
We usually throw the freeware locate.com into their logon script, and have it delete,
move, alert, whatever we want from there. It's a great program for finding junk on a
workstation. We use it during migrations to go find all PSTs and PABs and move them
up to the network before we blow the
vulnerability [MS01-020], but due to a bug
in the code, the attachment will not run automatically.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: attachments+virus
Yeah? So how does it get
Bring your own chair. I think next time they'll be saving even more
money by leaving the lights off, too, so I'm bringing a miner's helmet.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, November 25, 2002 7:22 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
I think once the guy post the actual problem he's trying to solve, rather than his
non-solution to it, it will become clear that either BLAT or MAPISEND will solve the
problem. But who knows, since he won't give any details.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL
, ask Santa for the thingy that will read email to me in my
sleep.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:31 PM
Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP
I think
Go to Joeware.net, free c++ tools, grab GetUserInfo.exe. Run it against your domain
controllers. You'll have to run it once for each user object.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:06 PM
Posted To: MSExchange
Or a deft paraphrasing thereof:
It's easier to stop sticking a fork in your ear than it is to try and construct some
kind of electro-magnetic hat.
- Ben M. Schorr
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:33 PM
Posted To:
You mean like the user dragged them into Outlook Today, at which point
they couldn't see them from Outlook? Right-click on Outlook today,
select Properties, click Home Page and turn off the show home page
thingy, then you can see them and move them back.
-Original Message-
From: Couch,
I found it at both Trend and Symantec, actually. Take your pick.
http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.prolin.worm.html
http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_PRO
LIN.A
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At:
While I'm sure SOMEONE has problems, I know quite a few people who use
it to run various versions of Exchange and OWA, with no ill effects.
-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 11:25 AM
Posted To: MSExchange
Make a mailbox on your system for one of the managers. It will be in
the GAL, of course. Now set forwarding on that mailbox to the guy(s) in
Dubai.
Better: Tell your moron users to add them in their own contacts list.
Best: Get the two morons in Dubai to have two mailboxes.
Unthinkably
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q285887
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, November 18, 2002 08:26 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Administration of Phone Numbers
Subject:
I don't understand the way you ask the question. How do you use a
recipient policy to do that?
I'd say go into AD Users Computers / View / Advanced. Right-click the
group, choose properties. Click the security tab. Add the people
you want to send as this group. Then click them, and give
Go into Outlook.
Hit F1.
Type [free busy] [enter]
It will tell you to go to tools options calendar options free/busy
options publish [] months of free/busy info.
-Original Message-
From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, November 18, 2002 11:00 AM
Posted
Yes. They'll need to hit view from field when composing a message to
turn it on, of course. If it doesn't work right away, it's because you
need to either force, or wait for AD replication. I can never remember
when you need to, and when you don't, because I'm marginally senile.
-tom
Use a POP3 client?
Use separate mailboxes for the separate addresses?
Scour Victor Ivanidze's cool site, maybe that SetFrom thingy will
work...
http://victori.hypermart.net/
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, November 18, 2002 11:44 AM
1. Apply latest service pack
2. Lock down all your NICs' speed and duplex settings, as well as the
hub. Server and workstations, please.
3. The thing that fixed it once and for all, for me, was the Office XP
Accessibility Update thingy. This should be rolled into OfficeXP SP2.
4. Does this
I'll have to check when I get to work (and of course I'll forget) but
something tells me I read a bit about it in Jim McBee's
_Exchange_2000_24seven_. If not, there's something useful in the pile
of papers that helps my desk remain firmly rooted to the floor. My
second guess being that I saw it
Before I even start looking, this one is caused by having misspelled
syntaph.com. They forgot the A in syntAph.
-tom
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: outlook test
Sent: 11/8/2002 9:43 AM
The following recipient(s) could not be
That would be cool. They could call it Qube or something. I hope it
gets to market before Sun thinks of it.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:craig.dupler;boeing.com]
Posted At: Friday, November 08, 2002 01:30 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation:
No. root@, postmaster@, hostmaster@, abuse@, etc. are just strongly
suggested iirc.
-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:DNicholson;rapidapp.com]
Posted At: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 11:05 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Postmaster reply address
Is your IP address that you're telnetting from in the Hosts and Clients
with these IP addresses... dialog? In that case, relaying will be
allowed.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Esgro [mailto:EdE;stainsafe.com]
Posted At: Thursday, October 31, 2002 09:08 AM
Posted To: MSExchange
So is WINS, just nobody has told Microsoft yet.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org]
Posted At: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 02:55 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: VPN breaks Outlook
Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook
It's saying that when it does a reverse DNS lookup of 64.45.174.203, it
expects to see the name that was presented in the HELO line, ie
msexpkce.pkce.com. However, it's seeing 64.45.174.203.cypresscom.net
and therefore deciding it's a forged communication.
C:\nslookup 64.45.174.203
Server:
640 Megs ought to be enough for anyone.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com]
Posted At: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 6:24 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: VPN breaks Outlook
Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook
The paperclip requires a minimum of 512
My opinion is that people should, at all costs, restrain the urge to
click on any hyperlink you send to this list.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
Posted At: Friday, October 25, 2002 6:50 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Open
You don't want it to listen on multiples, do you? Just 30, right?
This is pretty standard for gateway products that listen on port 25 and
the company's decided to support installation right on the Exchange box.
It's in the properties pages of your SMTP virtual server, general,
advanced button,
I think the point was filling up the drive. The idea behind circular
logging is that your logs get recycled and shouldn't be growing to the
point where they're filling up the drive, so they want you to eliminate
that as an answer.
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL
If you're talking about amfes.com, it's because you don't have any
reverse DNS.
You can reliably send to any other domain that does not require your
server to be represented by a valid reverse-DNS lookup. Which will rule
out Earthlink, too, among others.
-Original Message-
From:
That's an Outlook limit, not an Exchange limit. IIRC the default in 5.5 was 5,000 per
DL, but could be changed.
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, October 03, 2002 01:38 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation:
No !!
YQW
-tom
-Original Message-
From: Dave Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 09:16 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Exchange 2k downgrade !!
Subject: Exchange 2k downgrade !!
Is it possible to downgrade 2000
FAQ 3.23
-Original Message-
From: Gunanathan, Amir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:15 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Exchange with 2 email address
Subject: Exchange with 2 email address
Hi,
We have a single Exchange
You know it's configurable, right? You know there's a q-article about
that, right?
URLScan is a great tool. It helps secure my web server.
I don't use templates for squat, except as a starting point. They don't
replace a well-qualified administrator. Also, I tell my users to quit
using and
Deersoft's coming out with an Exchange2000-integrated version of
SpamAssassin.
http://www.deersoft.com/collateral/
I think it's still in its beta cycle.
-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 01:20 PM
Posted To:
RUN will find run, running, ran, runs, etc.
It's way fast, too.
And it's free.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 02:43 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Exchange 2000 full text indexing
These will set you right.
1.) Set up a recipient policy for your new domain. Make sure the box is
checked that says This server's authoritative for this domain or
whatever it is
2.) Add MX records to your DNS for those domains.
3.) Beer.
Please include the text of the original, so people know what you're
talking about.
From where are you attempting to mail-enable those users? Do it from a
machine with the Exchange System Tools installed.
-Original Message-
From: Berepoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday,
: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 2:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: using mailserver from another domain
Please include the text of the original, so people know what
you're talking about.
From where are you attempting to mail-enable
Break your NDA off-list, please, so those of us who honor ours don't
have to look at it.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, September 30, 2002 09:26 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: IMC as relay system (off
In the same AD Forest? Run setup.exe /domainprep on domB.
-Original Message-
From: Berepoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, September 27, 2002 10:01 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: using mailserver from another domain
Subject: using mailserver
Smtp virtual server delivery messages copy of NDR to this mailbox:
[whatever]
If you want it more sophisticated than that, set up a freeware post
office (mercury on win32, qmail, sendmail, whatever) and create a
catchall on that box. On the same page of your smtp vs properties,
choose
1 - 100 of 612 matches
Mail list logo
