A phone is a bone
Pick it, E-mail does not
Or does, does it?
Oh, a nit, snit.
Avoid lice in our hair,
Ignore ringing bone.
Ah, the phone,
It rang, then sent mail.
To me? Alas.
It's all apps.
We don't stoop to nets
Don't touch us - blind.
Oh, but wait.
I see, I see all.
Truth, it's both
-O
There are multiple reasons. All of the best ones (i.e. most compelling)
revolve around security. It's getting to the point where it is difficult to
find a way to penetrate a company's defenses attacking things in layer 6 and
below. Wireless is a temporary exception, but most attacks are now lau
Ah, but in the story Doyle has the hound covered with paint that glows in
the dark, rather dowdy wouldn't you say? But then, it was effective
dowdiness in the story.
Quality sarcasm, like quality haiku, or even quality dowdiness is often
great entertainment. It adds to the page turning (screen
An MCSE class?
-Original Message-
From: Dean Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 6:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Install trouble
I have just been given the task of setting up the companies exchange server.
(Exchange 2000 on Win 2k server)
Having ne
Is the Karova Milk Bar anywhere near Picadilly?
-Original Message-
From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: test
Oh no.. not another Kubrik reference.
Denis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROT
You may want to think this one through a bit.
Scenes of unrolling one's sleeping bag in the middle of the M-1 come to
mind.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Allowing e-mail to b
Restore connections
-Original Message-
From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Login?
Morning,
I have an interesting dilemma. Running E2k. One of my employees recently
redid her home computer.
Is anyone left here that remembers what "Bravehearts" meant?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[E
Ok, let me try another one. Is anyone left here that remembers or knows the
whereabouts of Elaine Sharp?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesear
Ah the lovely goddess of Exchange Ms. Cameron. Don't I know you from
another list and another lifetime?
-Original Message-
From: Kim Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OL2K - contacts..freakin Fax number area
t with MS"
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hi
Ok, let me try another one. Is anyone left here that remem
egy for causing a bad accident.
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 9:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hi
I will be doing integration with VoIP as soon as we get upgraded to 5.5 sp4.
Darcy
-----Original Message-
From
ange
> list?
>
> John Matteson; Exchange Manager
> Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
> (404) 239 - 2981
>
> ...the words that I remember from my childhood still are true, that there
> are none so blind as those who will not see
> --The Moody Blues (I
he words that I remember from my childhood still are true, that there
are none so blind as those who will not see
--The Moody Blues (I know you're out there)
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Dis
Interesting discussion.
A couple of observations: Exchange and Notes are about something quite
different than Oracle and other similar messaging engines. What Ellison
calls e-mail, is not the same thing. The reasons that the mostly Unix based
systems did not get the market that went the LAN se
uter
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dupler, Craig
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 3:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hi
Wasn't Peter subsidi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dupler, Craig
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hi
Austin was the last one I attended. But before that one, there was the MEC
in Bellevue at Meydenbauer Center, and there was an Exchange Dep
all be made of coral or of crystal; the price of wisdom is
above
pearls. - Job 28:18
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dupler, Craig
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hi
You mean about old times, o
Now you know why they quit asking me to speak at the MEC. I'm more of an
Exchange fan than they are . . .
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch
Jr.
- Original Message -
From: "Dupler, Craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:34 PM
Subject: RE: Hi
Now you know why they quit asking me to speak at
in other words - access to each other's stores
-Original Message-
From: Eric Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Lotus Notes
Allows you to send messages (ie, "Connect") between the two systems. It's
also pos
I agree with both EG's (Exchange goddesses)
Can Exchange act as a fax server? Not exactly. Fax's can be transported by
SMTP as a registered MIME type. This of course makes the server blind to
the content, and means that it can be a client issue. However, Exchange
Server can also have a FAX se
-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax
I agree with both EG's (Exchange goddesses)
Can Exchange act as a fax server? Not exactly. Fax's can be transported by
SMTP as a registered MIME type
Sander, I don't know if you got your answer, but some things to consider:
Are you sure you want to do this? The answer may be "yes," but humor me
while I walk through the process that should go into such a decision, and
what some of the alternatives are:
The usual objective of mirroring any ser
I like that "update their mapi to that mailbox."
I was thinking of updating my mapi of Taliban controlled areas of
Afghanistan.
-Original Message-
From: Darren York [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Cache file in Out
Another thought . . .
Can you still load the store for viewing? If the answer is yes, keep in
mind that multiple PST's are ok. You might be able to selectively drag and
drop whole sub folders, and scrub them as they arrive.
It is not possible, I think, for one person to have two gigs of "real"
The point Lori makes is important!
First, you need to have a company policy, and make sure that it is well
known. Also, you need to know what the privacy laws are in every
jurisdiction that applies. Some of these may run counter to your policy,
and it is the law that will take precedence, obvio
You should benchmark your reliability. Work with your vendors to determine
exactly what your current configuration will deliver in terms of:
- mean time between data loss events
Your first supporting table for this statistic should look like a seismic
event map so you can project not just the fr
It will cost more, regardless of it's robustness.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Unbreakable Oracle 9i
Anyone have an opinions on Oracle's claim to make exchange unbreakable
(ie r
Can you cluster hot tubs?
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange
Kevin...what exactly are you doing there?
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrato
Ok Lori, do you have a table that compares the two? This is interesting.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
Sue used to have a nice breakdown on what was what over a
testing one two three (5)
this is just a test message (7)
testing your patience (5)
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: test
Tests to the mail list
So newbie and tiresome
It worked a
You go the right answer twice (it's the preview pane or tri-pane viewer).
One small data addition. The time delay on the reader changing the flag
from unread to read is user settable: Tools - Options - Other - Preview
Pane.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
No, you are right, and Doug's answer was partial.
Before the folders that you want to synch to the iPaq become visible in
Active Synch's "Tools-Options-Inbox-Settings" they first have to be made
available off-line. This is done in Outlook. Bring up the properties
sheets for a folder and go to t
Since this topic area is getting some attention today, I thought it might be
interesting to mention some progress that has been made in the telephony
area.
It turns out that it is not unreasonable to expect, before the end of this
year, one or more devices built on the Pocket PC platform to come
Yes, you do have to have 2002, but you still have to make the folders
available off-line. If you don't then you still can't synch them to your
iPaq.
Sorry.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archi
No. This is a significant and long standing deficiency in OWA, and probably
an entrepreneurial opportunity similar to the one that ASL (now a part of
Extended Systems) worked on.
One could do it two ways - stupidly or neatly. The stupid way would be to
pull the data from the OWA U/I. The neat
Gee, three things I like in one day. Next thing someone will want to talk
about installing Exchange, Unity and Call Manager as a matched set on blade
servers in the switch room.
This could be worth a really good haiku tomorrow, or maybe an off-topic
thread on that Rosanjin Scholar dude on Iron C
q and
then on the next synch, they move to that folder on Exchange.
Ray Desjardins MCSE NT4.0/Win2k
Manager of Systems Services
Bridgewater State College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 3:34 PM
To: Exc
I can't test if
this can be done or not [1].
S.
[1] Help a poor admin out. Donate to "iPaq for Serdar" fund today!
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Get your network people to work with you to draw a chart that step by step,
maps out exactly how name resolution works in your environment. Once you
have the map, then the answer to your question will be obvious. Without the
map, all we can do is say "well, if your map looks like this, then your
ontact our Corporate Communications, I am
not authorized to talk about that. What they think at Wal-mart or Target or
any other company doesn't have any relevance to the discussion here.
Countering the argument by saying "you're wrong because your company is in
bad shape" is
The thing that I always found amazing was that as secretaries became office
administrators and clerks became accountants (in their minds), if you called
them by their earlier titles they took offense. The thing that was given in
lieu of money was treated as though its value was real. I would ha
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dillon, Jeff
> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 10:40 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
>
>
> Well, they're now in "bug-fix mode" as you've read, so
> there's a general moratoriu
Ok at the risk of having to flame again, I'll offer a forward looking view.
Yes, 32k is the current limit. No, we don't want MS to invest in changing
that code. What do we want?
The rules engine should be more than just a message routing PEP (policy
enforcement point). It should also be the i
OWA is not client aware. So long as you satisfy the browser requirements,
then the issues tend to be more about the usability of the screen.
-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: O
It may have been overly simplistic to state that OWA is not client aware.
While that is true, it is almost certainly a temporary state. There are two
issues that should cause it to change, and the both stem from the same
source.
Exchange and Notes will almost certainly continue to pretty much ma
Can it be done? Yes. It is possible to write a backup system that in
effect copies off the contents of individual mailboxes one at a time, thus
exploding single instance storage into some unfathomable large number that
will require Enron accounting to pay for the backup media.
Do any shipping b
There are many seldom used .PSTs and .OSTs in the naked city. This has been
but one of them.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 7:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Help me understand returning folders
Good morning
Check the message type icon. Are you sure your user did not drag a draft
back into the inbox?
Sending twice could be an issue too. I was thinking about how the message
could be cached without the header data, and preserved that way even after
it was sent. Some sort of synch scenario with a .
Replace OST with where I said PST
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ghost mail
Check the message type icon. Are you sure your user did not drag a draft
back into the inbox
Can't?
Draw a map of the stores (services in this case) and what is in each.
What is in a PAB?
What is in the Outlook Address Book?
And so on.
Then draw a map of what OWA could theoretically see and what it can see
because the code has been built. Remember, OWA is a web pump. It builds a
web
So Daniel,
Why is it that you choose to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous
questions from a rabble of poor players strutting about the stage of
Exchange Server operations? Do you imagine yourself to be in the role of
old Prospero, playing whatever role the scene requires, largely for the
When you say "internal users" what do you mean?
The way you laid out the problem, it rather sounds like these users are not
using Exchange, but some other SMTP mailer and then relying on your internal
DNS to point it toward Exchange - yes?
If this be the case, did your true DNS domain names and/
my dear
knight that shouldst it come to pass that the need finds itself manifest the
handpuppet thereby would be as King Henry to your Falstaff.
- Original Message -
From: "Dupler, Craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mond
y MX record changes since the site was still the same, we
still have the 5.5 server as our primary until all the users are migrated
over.
Hope that helps?
Wilson
-Original Message-----
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To:
27;t have been any address change since no one is allowed to
modify it.
Wilson Varghese
NT Systems Manager
KMV, LLC
Office: (415)229-0726
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchang
In the header, all fields are optional, except that one of the three "to"
fields (to, cc, and bcc) has to have something in it. It does not matter
which one. Delivery can occur if the correct address is in any of the
three, NOT JUST THE "TO" FIELD. Of the three, mail readers only display
two
person.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How is this possible ?
In the header, all fields are optional, except that one of the three "to"
fields (to, cc, and bcc) h
Yes, that's why you do it from the public library.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 10:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How is this possible ?
Actually,
You can skip all the 822 fields and most hosts will allo
Read up on the function of MX records in DNS, and the structure of "mail
relay hosts" and default DNS hosts (where one DNS server refers a lookup
request that it can't resolve itself).
-Original Message-
From: RB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 5:26 AM
To: Exchan
Probably.
Maybe you saw a post I wrote about a week ago on the topic of "happy
charts." It's similar to one I posted this list years ago (in the "Peter"
era). In effect, what you need to do is build a very careful map of exactly
where all of your packets are going and why, and as you have disc
So, for members of the Exchange team that have been tracking this
discussion, I think it is at least arguable that OST files should be thought
of as not necessarily being profile specific. Or, at the very least, there
should be an easy way to bypass an existing profile link, provided the
appropri
urity context remains constant; the OST remains linked to the
profile; however, prior OST's, created under a given profile, can be
opened and manipulated under the original profile.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 20
My guess is that the problem is probably much simpler than what has been
portrayed.
Are there any non-Exchange Server DL's or is there someone making heavy use
of personal DL's, with multiple entries or nesting going on? Almost
certainly, the system is doing exactly what the users have told it t
Also, I don't think that there is any governing Federal case law yet. The
first time there is a ruling in your circuit, your State law could be
modified, and depending on the type of case and the statutory authority, a
ruling in one circuit might be valid across the country. I am reasonably
cert
We use it. It works well. I think most of our users still use our older
DataBeam servers, as the URLs for them are more widely known.
What we are really trying to figure out is how to get to a single MCU
system: one that does both the virtual meeting function for NetMeeting and
the voice bridge
OWA with OST or PST
>
>
> A little behind on your reading Bill?
>
> Serdar Soysal
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:43 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: synchronizing O
change Discussions
Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
Well, they're now in "bug-fix mode" as you've read, so there's a general
moratorium on desired feature updates as well as the more numerous "you want
this--trust us" stuff. Probably worth the w
-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
Well I thought this had died with everyone having made their points, but
apparently not. I thought that last response to my post was so
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
> -Original Message-
> From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:32 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: synchronizin
The ones I get start "I wish your membership was on hold . . ."
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Your membership on exchange has been put on hold
Anybody else getting th
Yeah, but it gets very grey when the application is leveraging QoS or is an
LDAP query about the last MAC address where a specific user was running an
authenticated session (DEN/CIM capability).
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2
The lies we told about how secure it was . . .
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 7:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: hops?
Reminds me of what I used to say about MSMail: "What's amazing is not how
well the bear
If you have a problem, it will be with the ownership of defined objects.
For example, two fax servers will both want to define how to handle a
freeform address that looks like a phone number. I can't think of any
specific conflicts that have to exist by definition in two UM systems, but
they are
Baptism by fire, the usual experience.
Mike, next time instead of describing the problem vaguely, and then
proposing the solution that you intend to use and only asking questions
about how to implement that solution, be more direct.
First, describe the exact failure and include the exact text of
Convert to a 1985 version of cc:Mail running on Netware 2.0a.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 8:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How can I disable BCC feature on exchange server
Hello Everyone,
Our clients send lo
Did I get this right?
- You are an Exchange administrator.
- You want to send an e-mail message from your PC.
- You want to be logged in as you.
- You want to be in your personal copy of Outlook.
- You want the header of the message, when it is received, to indicate that
the sender was someone el
> in any name as long as you have permission to send as that person.
>
> Steve Evans
> Computing Services
> SDSU Foundation
> 619 594-0653
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 3:04 PM
> To: E
I suppose that it isn't real in the Platonic sense wherein all things are
but representations of an unseen ideal rather like shadows on the wall, but
Lori a mere shadow? Clearly Erik needs a trip to the "Ask the Experts"
booth at the next MEC.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:
Why are you convinced that something is wrong?
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 12:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Accounts
Okay, guys I need some help here, an e-mail was just forward to me from one
of my H
onday, April 22, 2002 1:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Accounts
Because of the fact that this is now running rampant through my exchange
site. It appears an outside site has been sending this crap all day.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
As I understand it, tools do exist to work with Jet family databases outside
of the context of the products in which they are embedded. This approach is
not recommended, and for that reason, those tools are reserved for use by
the developers. So, you need to at the very least interact with the
E
If you mean the Chevy, try the message boards at www.camaroz28.com
If you mean the Datsun/Nissan, try the classifieds at www.240z.org/
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Z
To lighte
Extended Exchange
Declares: "TGIF" in
Nippon poetics
-Original Message-
From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
1 - Waht does Haiku mean?
2 - I'm not understanding half of what yo
.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tools
They could go 162-0 and they'll still fall in 4 to the Yanks.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I'm not sure that it will drive the message, since it is coming out of the
server's store automatically, but it may be wise to make sure that to OST is
not synched to a previously excessive size.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29,
His minionness would appreciate that.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: totally OT:Ed Crowley
*sigh*
I do miss CJ... I'll go punish myself now...
New Features: Convert your limb
A null "from" field is compliant with the RFC's for a number of good
reasons. Also, I don't think you would want to pound on your (or anybody
else's) DNS servers to do something not related to packet delivery.
Besides, it wouldn't buy you much. Just because you have a positive DNS
resolution, it
I think those graphics would look like an ASCII representation of a binary
file.
Some days CJ's "graphic beard monogram" is more apropos than others.
CJ, since you're so good at this stuff, you should teach some classes on
technology and history someplace. I'm sure the kids would become heroe
Near term - offer as many options as you can (OWA, broadband, (not Citrix
for remoting Outlook, but perhaps offered it for other reasons). Make sure
that the users understand their options and that you are working on offering
better technologies as they are available.
Ok, long term. There needs t
I only know one thing that will induce a synch error at will. There are
probably others. I'll share my recipe and maybe that will help.
Recipe for indcing synch errors:
1. Set mailbox size limit low.
2. Have users fill mailboxes, including some meeting requests.
3. Have users attempt to pro
Dear Jeff,
To get any value out of this list, you have to assume that massive deletes
without reads is the norm.
Use a rule to move everything coming in from the list to a single folder.
Sort that folder by subject.
Don't even try to interact with a thread without using a tripane
viewer/reader.
F
You like to pay more for it?
The external source is owned by your CEO (ala Enron)?
You don't want to deal with reply traffic?
Your link to your ISP is via a 300 baud acoustic modem?
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA@;AIIM.ORG]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:08 PM
To:
IM is vile and inhuman technology, especially in the hands of carriers and
others with capitalist motives; but it can also move us back toward 19th
century attitudes about employee-management relations. We should launch a
campaign to stamp it out.
I just thought I'd throw that out there.
-Or
Hi Greg. This reminds me of the days when Ed C. called you Deckler the
heckler. How have you been?
I thought that nobody was going to pick-up the bait that I threw out there.
I thought it was sort of like throwing a copy of the beatitudes or some
Gandhi quotes into a debate about what to do abou
I am reminded of the old phrase that was so "lovingly" attributed to AT&T
back in the 60's: "We're the phone company, we don't care, we don't have
to."
Perhaps one in the business of providing a service and wanting to be
continuously improving the quality of that service with an aim toward
keepin
Tongue out of cheek - this is a product design problem of course.
Give me one good reason for Exchange being in the storage or data management
business. How it ought to work in a world with Active Directories and
Distributed File System overlays to NTFS is that a mailbox should be a
pointer to us
>From my perspective, such legal requirements are short sighted. We have
them in scattered places today, and it is usually a mistake.
Occasionally some good comes out of archiving such stuff, but it has to be
ok to use e-mail as an informal ad hoc communications tool. Setting it up
as a permanen
, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'
Hmm. . .so, then what are the implications of the new Tablet PC's? All
those meeting notes in electronic form - another gold mine for the lawyers.
Darcy
-Original Message-----
From
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
