--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
eki, i saw this durga yantra, covered in sanskrit;
i am hoping you might translate for me? TIA!
http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a7/coolpraks/durgayant.jpg
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Again, I think we're back to the issue of you not valuing
I don't know and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest
george.deforest@ wrote:
eki, i saw this durga yantra, covered in sanskrit;
i am hoping you might translate for me? TIA!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From my perspective, it seems that the premise that
God is doing all the doing has absolutely *zero*
implications for behavior, including how one thinks.
It's just a theoretical metaphysical point that's fun
to play
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Again, I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 10/20/07 6:41:39 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
do.rflex@ writes:
He also fails to acknowledge that Congress isn't a 'Democratic'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 10/20/07 6:41:39 A.M. Central Daylight
Time,
do.rflex@ writes:
On Oct 20, 2007, at 12:51 PM, new.morning wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, I think we're back to the issue of you not valuing
I don't know and both Curtis and I valuing it a lot. We
find some of our inspiration *in* not knowing. You
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
snip
This is one of my all-time favorite jokes. One person asks
the other: What do you think is worse in our society today,
the general level of
Billy,
Woo, nice dense writing. Good on ya.
But, though I wrote it up as a romantic fable of sorts, don't you
think that this story has something very important for all spiritual
adherants to eventually get?
It is one thing for the universe to suddenly make the monk robot
sweep the woman up in
TMr's voice on a top rated video on YouTube
http://youtube.com/watch?v=wIIz0U5x6N0
OffWorld
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
big snip
Again, I think we're back to the issue of you not valuing
I don't know and both Curtis and I valuing it a lot. We
find some of our inspiration *in* not knowing. You seem to
be more inspired by the belief that
T wrote: It seems that the main point of a rationalist atheist is,
that he will
not believe what cannot be proven. So his rationale is that he will
only adopt a belief, if there is a proof. Thats his ethics. He
believes in a reality that has to be proven. I was throughout the
whole post referring
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@
wrote:
snip
This is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Me: I think a perfectly rational atheist is as much a myth
as a person who just believes everything. We are all a mix
of mental abilities and this is necessary to live in the
world. None of us just believe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For me,when I adopt a belief, I don't need a proof. Its therefore
okay, if I'm 'wrong'.
...
It seems that the main point of a rationalist atheist is, that he will
not believe what cannot be proven. So his rationale is
Yep, it is a nice story and your telling is much richer than most I have heard.
I certainly agree with you about its value for every/any one since we all tend
to carry rules-based social conduct as an interpretive register. And I would
agree that such a social syndrome leads us to perpetuate
My sense is that the appeal or lack thereof of a
particular belief comes first, and evaluation
second; and that the evaluation is designed to
reinforce or reject the belief on the basis of
whether it does or does not have appeal to the
individual.
When we reject a long-held belief, it's
Gary Kasparov runs against Putin:
Awesome interview:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=LQYyPooETcI
OffWorld
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
It's this suspending the need for further proof
thing that interests me in all these conversations
lately about knowing. It's all well and good to
say that each knowing just reveals a new mystery,
Oops. Looks
But there is a huge vast sliding scale
of probabilistic hierarchy and ranking of beliefs and disbeliefs.
Excellent addition to the discussion New, probability ranking. That
is closer to how we really live with our belief disbelief continuum.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning
In a message dated 10/20/07 5:31:40 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 10/20/07 6:41:39 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
He also fails to acknowledge that Congress isn't a 'Democratic'
Congress. Sixty votes are required to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy, your comment (below) seems very right on to me.
Similarly, do you think that your chronic criticism
of Barry might be related as much to something about
his personality or style that really rankles you as
much
eki, thank you for giving it a try;
if it is too difficult, just forget about it;
i only was curious, no other purpose.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
george.deforest@ wrote:
eki, i saw this durga yantra, covered in sanskrit;
i am hoping you might translate for me? TIA!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
You whine and complain about Republican
obstructionism now and say they are standing in the way
of the will of the people when Democrats have done the
very same thing since '94.
Nope. The Republicans are doing it *far
t3rinity wrote:
http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a7/coolpraks/durgayant.jpg
The center-hexagram contains a quite known Chamunda mantra:
'Om Aim Hrim Klim Chamundaye Vichhe'
'Om Aim hrim klim' being in the center
and the sylables starting from 'Cha' at the bottom triangle
clockwise
Using a sliding scale probabilistic belief system (instead of a
dichotomous I believe vs I don't believe facilitates regular if
not constant updating and comparison of strength of belief. Lots of
little incremental, easy updates -- not some HUGE a BIG decision like
atheist or believer.
If one is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My sense is that the appeal or lack thereof of a
particular belief comes first, and evaluation
second; and that the evaluation is designed to
reinforce or reject the belief on the basis of
whether it does
Snip
ME: To give a personal example, my POV shift on belief in God happened
when I went from assuming its reality to asking the question, Why
do I believe? I had reasons, but I had not really examined them
in the direction of objectivity.
Judy: What triggered your asking that question?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I guess you never grew up with a strong belief in God did you?
Nope. Still don't have one, at least in the kind of
God most people believe in.
(At one point when I was still very young I remember
asking my
http://youtube.com/watch?v=nLGNNX9ZqDE
Is it trollish that I post this here? Probably, but I love the smell
of Shemp cookin' on the barbie.
On another level, it's not spamming on my part, cuz I'm completely
able to defend trikking as a spiritual experience.
Now here's a concept: no one here
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Right now, I'm, like, standing up on my chair
and applauding whenever Judy rips Pred a new one. Sigh. And, now
watch, she'll write that in no way is she ripping anything -- just
clarifying is all. Hee hee.
Who's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
snip
You whine and complain about Republican
obstructionism now and say they are standing in the way
of the will of the people when Democrats have done the
Now here's a concept: no one here has yet to get a Trikke, and though
I've waxed as eloquent as possible about the thrills of the
experience, my words have not gotten to whatever needs getting to
in order for a purchase to have happened.
I came close to getting one about two years ago. They look
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...But the deeper part of me wanted to face
the truth as I saw it no matter where it lead and that part won.
Uups,Deeper part, Truth ... don't tell that to Barry ;-)
What triggered your asking that question?
ME: It was after I had dropped out of TM. I was doing an
epistemological overhaul on myself, and a friend who had
shared my journey out of TM told me that he had taped a
show on TV called the American Atheist with Madalyn O'Hair.
I had no
Comment below:
**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis
reavismarek@ wrote:
Judy, your comment (below) seems very right on to me.
Similarly, do you think that your chronic criticism
of Barry might
Torque the Pred?
Unky Punky?
The Pain in Spain
I've been so enjoying your lastest summations of him, I'm ashamed
of myself.
;-)
And, yet, there you are psychocuddling with the atheists to an degree
I cannot support. They're little coffee clutch chatter has been so
telling about how
MAHARISHI YAGYA PERFORMANCES AROUND THE YEAR
To Create Heaven On Earth In Everyone's Life
Vijaya Dashami Victory Day
21st October 2007
Vijaya Dashami Day to bring victory
and success to one's undertakings
`Victory Day' brings the nine days of Mother Divine toa glorious
conclusion. When the
In a message dated 10/21/07 12:05:37 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com)
, [EMAIL PROTECTED], MDi
snip
You whine and complain about Republican
obstructionism now and say they are standing in the way
of
And, yet, there you are psychocuddling with the atheists to an degree
I cannot support. They're little coffee clutch chatter has been so
telling about how subtle they AREN'T when it comes to clarity about
identification.
This is your contribution to the discussion? clarity about
identification?
Curtis,
Okay on your breaking rapport chiding -- I'll try
harder/better/wiser. Yeah, I was cheap shotting atcha.
BUT BUT BUT
I've written soo much about identification.
Okay, so, I get it. My posts are not convincing anyone, and since I
don't claim enlightenment, then, of course, my
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Torque the Pred?
Unky Punky?
The Pain in Spain
I've been so enjoying your lastest summations of him, I'm
ashamed
of myself.
;-)
And, yet, there you are psychocuddling with the atheists to an
degree
I
Bhairitu,
I meant to ask you as you meditate with a longer mantra
effortlessly,are you able to let go completely as in TM where the
bija can become very faint,unclear, and barely recognizable.Are you
able to allow a longer mantra to become very faint,unclear, and
barely recognizable also?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
That's what happened back on alt.meditation.transcend-
ental when Judy caught a whiff of me. One day I was
just cruising along, having a good time posting my
random thoughts, and then suddenly there she was,
IN MY
Is there any evidence of this? Folks have measured the length of sojourn in
TC? Wouldn't that also depend on the individual, on length of practice and
predisposition, to name just a few of the possible variables? a
Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: About $4000.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So then, what's the difference? the transcendence is the
transcendent, right?
I think the point is that some are trying to say
that what many TMers think is the transcdenant
isn't really.
I do not choose to
In the Hindu yogic tradition I practiced in, the gap or
transcendent in TM speak is only just the beginning...and it's not
truly transcendental consciousness, it's merely a thought-free state.
It is however an important sign that practice is ready to go to
another level, one where the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And it just drives me kookoo
Yes...we know.
to agree with one person one day and hate
their ideas the next.
Schizo?
Sigh. And, now watch, she'll write that in no way is she ripping
anything -- just
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, docu1000 docu1000@ wrote:
Below is a free alert from Mahendra Sharma (link
http://www.mahendraprophecy.com/LatestFlash.asp?Id=334Page=3%
20 ). I
wonder what Maharishi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the Hindu yogic tradition I practiced in, the gap or
transcendent in TM speak is only just the beginning...and it's not
truly transcendental consciousness, it's merely a thought-free
state. It is however an important
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the Hindu yogic tradition I practiced in, the gap or
transcendent in TM speak is only just the beginning...and it's not
truly transcendental consciousness, it's merely a thought-free state.
It is however an important
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
In the Hindu yogic tradition I practiced in, the gap or
transcendent in TM speak is only just the beginning...and it's not
truly transcendental
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
In the Hindu yogic tradition I practiced in, the gap or
transcendent in TM speak is
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071021/ap_on_re_as/india_monkey_attack
NEW DELHI - Wild monkeys attacked a senior government official who
then fell from a balcony at his home and died Sunday, media reported.
ADVERTISEMENT
New Delhi Deputy Mayor S.S. Bajwa was rushed to a hospital after the
attack
On Oct 21, 2007, at 9:41 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the Hindu yogic tradition I practiced in, the gap or
transcendent in TM speak is only just the beginning...and it's not
truly transcendental consciousness, it's merely a
On Oct 21, 2007, at 9:43 PM, BillyG. wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the Hindu yogic tradition I practiced in, the gap or
transcendent in TM speak is only just the beginning...and it's not
truly transcendental consciousness, it's merely a
On Oct 21, 2007, at 10:03 PM, BillyG. wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
In the Hindu yogic tradition I practiced in, the gap or
transcendent in TM speak is only just the
The proof of the pudding is in the eating.
Angela Mailander wrote:
Is there any evidence of this? Folks have measured the length of sojourn in
TC? Wouldn't that also depend on the individual, on length of practice and
predisposition, to name just a few of the possible variables? a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 21, 2007, at 9:43 PM, BillyG. wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
In the Hindu yogic tradition I practiced in, the gap or
transcendent in TM speak is only just the
http://www.colbertnation.com/
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2209521538
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?
fuseaction=user.viewprofilefriendid=118579611
I love the banner Stewart/Colbert... it's time to change the sheets
Maybe this will be a re-take on the Jessie Ventura story.
62 matches
Mail list logo
