--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Karma is what tradition would state, not stress.
Actually, stress in MMY's lingo refers to samskaras,
[restoring snipped portion]
impressions left in the mind of past experiences (in
this or previous lives). In the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm hardly the only person to have made this
observation (and I made it independently,
before learning that others had made it as
well, just on the strength of the similarities).
It seems rather strange, Vaj, that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
willytex@ wrote:
Robert Gimbel wrote:
Yeah, but, Ms. Magdalene was considered to be a whore,
and I'm not sure that anyone would respect a Rabbi who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel babajii_99@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
willytex@ wrote:
Robert Gimbel wrote:
Yeah, but, Ms. Magdalene was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Robert, again no disrespect intended, but you
should get a few books on the Bible and read
up before you spout off. There is not ONE
WORD in the Bible that characterizes Mary
Magdalene as a whore. Not one.
This is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I know that many people don't like to consider this,
and find some comfort or inspiration in believing
that Christ was NOT human, and that he was somehow
divine and the literal Son Of God.
Actually, Christian
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 25, 2007, at 9:23 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
This just verifies what I've stated here numerous times,
that the TM myth of physical stress release from the
physical nervous system was fallacious. Where stress is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
There are two people here: you mention Mary of Magdala,
This is a different person than Mary Magdalene.
No, same lady. Magdalene means of Magdala
(just as Nazarene means of Nazareth).
From the New Testament,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On May 25, 2007, at 9:23 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
This just verifies what I've stated here numerous times,
that the TM myth of physical stress
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
snip
I know that many people don't like to consider this,
and find some comfort or inspiration in believing
that Christ was NOT human, and that he
On May 28, 2007, at 11:50 AM, cardemaister wrote:
On May 25, 2007, at 9:23 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
This just verifies what I've stated here numerous times,
that the TM myth of physical stress release from the
physical nervous system was fallacious. Where stress is
being
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The word saMskaara is actually almost the same as
Sanskrit in, well, Sanskrit -- which is saMskRta.
That word, saM-s-kRta, consists of the perfect participle
of the root kR (to do, etc), with the prefix sam
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
snip
I know that many people don't like to consider this,
and find some comfort or
--No need to separate out one body from another. It's a package deal.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 28, 2007, at 11:50 AM, cardemaister wrote:
On May 25, 2007, at 9:23 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
This just verifies what I've stated here
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel babajii_99@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Uh, with all due respect, the only thing Jesus
has ever been accused of, and in some of the
Gospels excised from the Bible, no less, was
that he was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, but, Ms. Magdalene was considered to be a whore, and I'm not
sure that anyone would respect a Rabbi who married a whore.
You remember that in that period of history, her fate would have
been
death, if Jesus
On May 25, 2007, at 6:36 PM, qntmpkt wrote:
---Vaj, I know you're heavily into tradition but there's something
called new knowledge;
And you feel the blossoming of new knowledge isn't part of or hasn't
happened in a tradition before? There's little new under the sun.
Tradition is merely
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of boo_lives
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 6:46 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A different explanation of stress release
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Gimbel wrote:
Yeah, but, Ms. Magdalene was considered to be a whore,
and I'm not sure that anyone would respect a Rabbi who
married a whore. You remember that in that period of
history, her fate
--Question below: did I stray from TM while (during the period)
Muktananda dug his fingers into my eyeballs, giving me Shaktipat?
Ans: Nope...not straying, just continuing my overall research into
various Gurus. I've always practiced TM since 1967 but wanted to
confirm if there was anything
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My ambition (among other things), is to find out what
makes ordinary people -i.e. not on the Spiritual path - tick in
terms of their reluctance to practice any type of Spiritual Sadhana.
For the most part, I blame
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When reading the following passage from Swami Muktananda's Satsang
with Baba, Volume III (August 18, 1972, page 122), I thought that
it
was another explanation of the mechanics of stress release; that
is,
that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt qntmpkt@ wrote:
---Yea...Swami Muktananda - it appears from available evidence
that
he was quite adept at molesting underage Daughters of his
disciples.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt qntmpkt@ wrote:
---Yea...Swami Muktananda - it appears from available evidence
that he
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Perhaps a dazzing display of Sidhis would turn such people on. What
do you think? snip
Wow! I think you should consider writing a book on your various
experiences with all these paths and gurus. It might reach a
---It's quite true that many people not doing any Sadhana are highly
evolved; but it's also true (imo) that they can be MORE highly
evolved by taking up some type of meditation practice, or perhaps
chanting.. Your opinion differs from that of MMY - since he clearly,
at one time believe in and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel babajii_99@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt qntmpkt@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel babajii_99@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt qntmpkt@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
babajii_99@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
When reading the following passage from Swami
Muktananda's Satsang
with Baba, Volume III (August 18, 1972, page 122), I thought
that
it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---Yea...Swami Muktananda - it appears from available evidence that
he was quite adept at molesting underage Daughters of his
disciples.
And Bill Clinton brutally raped Juanita Broderick.
So what? Whether it's true
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 24, 2007, at 8:53 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
When reading the following passage from Swami
Muktananda's Satsang
with Baba, Volume III (August 18, 1972, page 122), I thought
that it
was another explanation of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 24, 2007, at 8:53 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
When reading the following passage from Swami
Muktananda's Satsang
with Baba, Volume III (August 18, 1972, page 122), I thought
that it
was another explanation of the
On May 25, 2007, at 9:23 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
This just verifies what I've stated here numerous times, that the
TM
myth of physical stress release from the physical nervous system
was
fallacious. Where stress is being released is in the pranic body
or
vajra body. It is the pranic body
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 25, 2007, at 9:23 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
This just verifies what I've stated here numerous times, that
the
TM
myth of physical stress release from the physical nervous
system
was
fallacious. Where stress
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 25, 2007, at 9:23 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
This just verifies what I've stated here numerous times, that
the
TM
myth of physical stress release from the physical nervous system
was
fallacious. Where stress
On May 25, 2007, at 10:25 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
utterly fallacious and misleading?
Methinks you doth protest too much. It's just an innoculous way of
saying the same thing to make it palatable to another audience.
Methinks thou art brainwashed.
Sorry, they are not the same thing, despite
---Vaj, I know you're heavily into tradition but there's something
called new knowledge; but ultimately, the idea is to seek the
truth, whether from tradition, authorities, Scriptures, one's own
experience, heresay evidence;...better yet, everything together with
one's own experience at the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt qntmpkt@ wrote:
---Yea...Swami Muktananda - it appears from available evidence
that
he was quite adept at molesting underage Daughters of his
disciples.
Yes, so
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When reading the following passage from Swami Muktananda's Satsang
with Baba, Volume III (August 18, 1972, page 122), I thought that
it
was another explanation of the mechanics of stress release; that
is,
that
---Yea...Swami Muktananda - it appears from available evidence that
he was quite adept at molesting underage Daughters of his disciples.
Looks like a mismatch between speech and action!
He initiated me into Shaktipat in 1980. (dug his fingers into my
eyeballs and a brilliant image of himself
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---Yea...Swami Muktananda - it appears from available evidence that
he was quite adept at molesting underage Daughters of his disciples.
Yes, so I've heard. Still a nice insight, and I appreciate Shemp's
posting it.
43 matches
Mail list logo
