On Mar 13, 2006, at 10:41 PM, wayback71 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 13, 2006, at 9:21 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
An MUM staffer says that Bevan and lawyers are putting quite a bit
into the
lawsuit against MUM brought by the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
I could easily have been guilty of the same negligence
Joel Wysong displayed while watching the guy. I suspect
he was in the other room
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
I could easily have been guilty of the same negligence
Joel Wysong
On Mar 14, 2006, at 9:07 AM, authfriend wrote:
I don't know Joel, but it's very possible that he's
like some people here and convinced that he was not
the doer in this whole scenario and thus bears no
responsibility for it whatsoever.
Amazing. Barry's *still* getting not the doer
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
PErhaps because they DID screw up, to some extent?
What perhaps? It
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 14, 2006, at 9:07 AM, authfriend wrote:
I don't know Joel, but it's very possible that he's
like some people here and convinced that he was not
the doer in this whole scenario and thus bears no
on 3/14/06 1:50 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just *think* how many similar tragedies within the
TM movement will get to come out in this lawsuit.
Ya got the suicides on TM courses, ya got the guy
burning himself to death after having been locked
away in a basement room.
Not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
PErhaps because they DID screw up, to some extent?
What perhaps? It
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@ wrote:
on 3/13/06 10:10 PM, shempmcgurk at shempmcgurk@ wrote:
He
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
I'd start saying bye-bye to MUM if I were you. If they
lose a multi-million-dollar lawsuit in addition to
having no students, I'd bet that Fairfield is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
I'd start saying bye-bye to MUM if I were you. If they
lose a multi-million-dollar
on 3/14/06 9:48 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) it would be very sad for Fairfield if MUM went away, don't you
agree?
Not really.
Might be good for it. Something more interesting may take over the
university. Fairfield is well established as an eclectic spiritual community
Rick sounds like the Bush Administration, wanting to liberate subject
peoples. Has it occurred to anyone on this board that people who live at
MUM might actually enjoy the experience? That's why they live there!
May heaven save us from self-appointed liberators.
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
I'd start saying
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick sounds like the Bush Administration, wanting to liberate subject
peoples. Has it occurred to anyone on this board that people who
live at
MUM might actually enjoy the experience? That's why they live there!
May
It's the same way of thinking, though. The idea that we know more than
they do about what's good for them. If you talk to people on campus about
why they are there, you will get almost as many answers as there are people.
Everyone has their own reasons. Instead of talking about people needing
The bulk of the people who have chosen to remain in FF, after pretty
much having severed their ties to the MIU/MUM way of life are anything
but Plain Folks.
Following Lady Saints (not that there's anything wrong with that),
doing fire yagyas and the like, and the myriad host of other types of
on 3/14/06 10:51 AM, feste37 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's the same way of thinking, though. The idea that we know more than
they do about what's good for them. If you talk to people on campus about
why they are there, you will get almost as many answers as there are people.
Everyone has
Sure, it's just great, Feste. When are you moving there? :)
Sal
On Mar 14, 2006, at 10:23 AM, feste37 wrote:
Rick sounds like the Bush Administration, wanting to liberate subject
peoples. Has it occurred to anyone on this board that people who live at
MUM might actually enjoy the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's the same way of thinking, though. The idea that we know more
than
they do about what's good for them. If you talk to people on
campus about
why they are there, you will get almost as many answers as there are
people.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And the news for those who would go into an orgy of delight if MUM
folded is .
. . it ain't gonna happen. For those who live in Fairfield, go take
a look at the
new construction going on there. MUM is in a growth phase.
I got a good laugh out of this, especially your comment, Since the advent of
Stapathya Veda the place reminds me of a Madame
Blavatsky convention, a bunch of aged dour looking people. Have you
been to Annapurna dining hall recently, Anon? I think you might be surprised
at what you find there
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
And the news for those who would go into an orgy of delight if
MUM
folded is .
. . it ain't gonna happen. For those who live in Fairfield, go
take
a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The campus itself went stapathya Vedic and now there are like 100
students occupying a 200 acre campus, 2 acres per student.
It's a ghost town, soon it will resemble a Hindu Ghost Town, nice
buildings run by skinny,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
It's the same way of thinking, though. The idea that we know
more
than
they do about what's good for them. If you talk to people on
campus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 13, 2006, at 9:21 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
An MUM staffer says that Bevan and lawyers are putting quite a bit
into the
lawsuit against MUM brought by the parents of Levi Butler. The suit
draws a
bigger line
on 3/13/06 9:41 PM, wayback71 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No one person is to blame for this tragedy. For example, I imagine that the
parents of
Sem wish, in retrospect, thatthey had never let him go far from home to go to
college
when he had a history (didn't he?) of mental illness.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 3/13/06 9:41 PM, wayback71 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No one person is to blame for this tragedy. For example, I
imagine that the
parents of
Sem wish, in retrospect, thatthey had never let him go far from
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wayback71 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Mar 13, 2006, at 9:21 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
An MUM staffer says that Bevan and lawyers are putting quite a
bit
into the
lawsuit against
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
An MUM staffer says that Bevan and lawyers are putting quite a bit
into the
lawsuit against MUM brought by the parents of Levi Butler. The suit
draws a
bigger line to include other TM organizations besides MUM; the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 3/13/06 9:41 PM, wayback71 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No one person is to blame for this tragedy. For example, I
imagine that the
parents of
Sem wish, in retrospect, thatthey had never let him go far from
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
An MUM staffer says that Bevan and lawyers are putting quite a
bit
into the
lawsuit against MUM brought by the parents of Levi Butler. The
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@
wrote:
An MUM staffer says that Bevan and lawyers are putting quite a
bit
on 3/13/06 10:10 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He should get counselling.
I'm serious.
If Joel is feeling any amount of guilt it should only be to the
degree that it was his responsibility to follow the code of conduct
as published by the university: that is, that the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 3/13/06 10:10 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He should get counselling.
I'm serious.
If Joel is feeling any amount of guilt it should only be to the
degree that it was his responsibility
on 3/13/06 10:32 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A guy got scratched in the face with a pen in a scuffle. Do you
believe that the prof was negligent in turning his back and taking a
shower? Obviously, he didn't believe the guy to be any kind of threat.
Didn't the scratch require 7
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 3/13/06 10:32 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A guy got scratched in the face with a pen in a scuffle. Do you
believe that the prof was negligent in turning his back and taking
a
shower?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 13, 2006, at 9:21 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
An MUM staffer says that Bevan and lawyers are putting quite a
bit
into the
lawsuit against MUM brought by the parents of Levi Butler. The
suit
draws a
bigger
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 3/13/06 10:32 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A guy got scratched in the face with a pen in a scuffle. Do you
believe that the prof was negligent in turning his back and taking a
shower? Obviously,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I could easily have been guilty of the same negligence
Joel Wysong displayed while watching the guy. I suspect
he was in the other room meditating when Sem stole the
knife and left his house. Then he sat and ate
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
PErhaps because they DID screw up, to some extent?
What perhaps? It was a clear case of negligence.
A guy got scratched in the face with a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 3/13/06 10:10 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He should get counselling.
I'm serious.
If Joel is feeling any amount of guilt it should only be to the
degree that it was his responsibility
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@ wrote:
on 3/13/06 10:10 PM, shempmcgurk at shempmcgurk@ wrote:
He should get counselling.
I'm serious.
If Joel is feeling any
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...and this is where the negligence occurred...and we all know why
it occurred: the TMO and MUM did not want to inflate crime figures
for a TMing environment that would disprove the Maharishi Effect.
Is there
Someone asked me to post:
Re MUM lawsuit
Orthey will have to dip into the finances assoc w/ MMY in
India...which MMY won't give up a pennyso I will predict..
are you ready
are you sure.
they will start a donation program to raise money for the legal defense
47 matches
Mail list logo
