--- jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex
Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
---
--- jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
opps, yes, that is whom I meant. Heavy smoker and
sold cigs for a
living, as I understand.
Do you see that as a contradiction for someone
established in Being?
It appears to be, but that's more a concept
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Wether a film is real or not real, the real issue is, that most of
the movies created today aren't worth watching.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In
Abutilon108,
It was Gangaji's use of language that made me say that hypnotic states
were being invoked. Same with MMY or the Tarrot reader down the
street. It is a style of language designed to shift awareness, not to
inform about specifics, and it follows very precise and obvious rules.
Turqs'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Although I have an obvious bias towards the hypnosis theory
perspective on my own subjective experiences in TM over MMY's
version, I am aware that there is a whole lot more interesting
consciousness
Judy,
Erickon's work extended its effectiveness into the group usually
thought to be resistant to hypnosis. I don't know what version you
tried, but I think being human means that you have access to these
states. I don't know if anyone is resistant to the states themselves.
Inducing them is up
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy,
Erickon's work extended its effectiveness into the group usually
thought to be resistant to hypnosis. I don't know what version you
tried, but I think being human means that you have access to these
You've just defined away any kind of distinctions
between these states. They're all hypnotic. We're
all going around in hypnotic states all the time.
I would say we drift in an out of them all the time. We do have a
preferred style of non hypnotic awareness that dominates for most
people most of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had very little success generating alpha waves
on an EEG machine when I took a biofeedback course
(pre-TM).
Glad you clarified it was pre-TM because I was just about to call
Bevan -- AND the Course Office. (shudder
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
snip
Although I have an obvious bias towards the hypnosis theory
perspective on my own subjective experiences in TM over MMY's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You've just defined away any kind of distinctions
between these states. They're all hypnotic. We're
all going around in hypnotic states all the time.
I would say we drift in an out of them all the time. We do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
Any time we disrupt the ordinary percentages of
what we pay attention to, and shift if from outward to inward,
hypnotic conditions are present. We become aware of input we were
ignoring and begin to pay
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
snip
Although I have an obvious bias towards the hypnosis theory
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
[...]
Any time we disrupt the ordinary percentages of
what we pay attention to, and shift if from outward to inward,
hypnotic conditions
Re: Scandal hits Gangaji
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
[...]
Any time we disrupt the ordinary percentages of
what we pay attention to, and shift if from outward to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for this post, Tom. There were too many posts
implying Gangaji was some sort of fraud. She is one
powerful woman. Some people repond to an advaitic
teacher and others just get confused.
I don't know if you were
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote:
Thanks for this post, Tom. There were too many posts
implying Gangaji was some sort of fraud. She is one
powerful woman. Some people repond to an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
Thanks for this post, Tom. There were too many posts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
Dismissal of the relative isn't Advaitic anyway.
Yes. Its sort of like concluding that people who realize that films
are an illusion, are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And/or -- parallel to greeks -- Hericlitus? -- its ever changing. It
has no permanence. Its here today, gone tomorrow. How can one give
that the status of real.
That is precisely the anti-relative perspective that I'm
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
snip
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
And/or -- parallel to greeks -- Hericlitus? -- its ever changing. It
has no permanence. Its here today, gone tomorrow. How can one give
that the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
And/or -- parallel to greeks -- Hericlitus? -- its ever
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
And, just because something changes means it's therefore not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
snip
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
snip
The way all of this makes sense to me is both the absolute and
relative 'pieces' of existence are equal, because it is through
the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
snip
The way all of this makes sense to me is both the absolute and
In my fling with the dark lord, it was all about Dunhill.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
opps, yes, that is whom I meant. Heavy smoker and sold cigs for a
living, as I understand.
Do you see that as a contradiction for someone established in Being?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vor65mNB8Uk
To
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Scandal hits Gangaji
on 10/12/06 5:10 PM, abutilon108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had been quite captivated by her for some time, but finally came to
feel that she had a way of producing experiences in people which they
took for awakening. Of course, everyone
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 10/12/06 5:10 PM, abutilon108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had been quite captivated by her for some time, but finally
came to feel that she had a way of producing experiences in
people which they took for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I never saw her in person but I¹ve seen and listened to her on
tapes. I like
her. She¹s helped a lot of people Awaken.
River Ganga (video-well done) Who Am I (2 audio tape set) :)
I've met her. I liked her
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
She's one hot honey!
Attractive, yes...hot? I don't think so. :-)
The thang with Eli doesn't surprise me. I'm more surprised
that they're still together. He had to go through a lot.
Their story was that Eli went
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent points! I dug your keep'n it reaaal version.
Here is another version of the letter:
Yeah, he banged a younger chick. Don't sweat it, Mama Ganjaji is
carving her own nubile slice. She just
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
So that's a lot for an ego (especially a male ego) to
handle. I only was around them once, for a couple of days,
and they seemed like they enjoyed being together and
enjoyed each others' company, but I'm not
Thanks new morning that was very very funny.A good way to start
the day!Kevin
While I am sure what they are doing is all good, when reading the
letter I sort of felt like it was a parody of how a new age group
would deal with a sex scandal. Maybe something on SNL. Or a John
Stewart
--- Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I went to one of her satsangs at the Best Western
when she visited FF
back in the '90s. People were ooohing and aing
and giggling
uncontrollably in response to her words, and in my
mind I was like,
WTF is the matter with you people? She
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The Gangaji Foundation
2245 Ashland St.
Ashland, OR 9752
They've moved again? In the last 10 years they've been in at least 3
locations: Boulder, Stimson Beach, and now Ashland. Well, at least
Eli's
Re: Scandal hits Gangaji
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The Gangaji Foundation
2245 Ashland St.
Ashland, OR 9752
They've moved again? In the last 10 years they've been in at least 3
locations: Boulder, Stimson Beach, and now Ashland. Well, at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, indeed! Who is she?
Who is Gangaji...is he somehow connected to Amma?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
Dear Gangaji Foundation Community,
It is possible that you
Gangaji is a she, not a he. The he in question is her
husband, Eli Jackson Bear. Both are advaitic spiritual
teachers in the lineage of Ramana Maharishi through
Papaji.
--- shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who is Gangaji...is he somehow connected to Amma?
--- In
--- jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks John.
I can see where those types of 'pointing out'
conversations could be
useful for some. She seems to have a good effect on
folks caught in the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick,
Did you ever meet with her? What is your opinion of her? She is on
our local cable channels in DC. I guess her Mississippi background
gives her a pass on the sloow talking, but I find it impossible
On Oct 12, 2006, at 1:19 AM, new.morning wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The Gangaji Foundation
2245 Ashland St.
Ashland, OR 9752
They've moved again? In the last 10 years they've been in at least 3
locations: Boulder, Stimson
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Scandal hits Gangaji
on 10/12/06 12:45 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who is Gangaji...
http://www.gangaji.org/
is he somehow connected to Amma?
She. No.
__._,_.___
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http
I can't watch her on TV either w/o getting bored and rolling my eyes,
but in person I experienced some very beneficial shifts in awareness,
at least 10 years ago I did.
Thanks for your impressions. The language form she uses is clearly
meant to shift states of awareness. It would work better
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The thing with her husband must be crushingly sad for her. Since I
view them as ordinary people, no matter what their subjective
experience, it is no news flash that powerful dude cheats on gray
haired wife.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Gangaji Foundation
2245 Ashland St.
Ashland, OR 9752
They've moved again? In the last 10 years they've
been in at least 3
locations: Boulder, Stimson
Excellent points! I dug your keep'n it reaaal version.
Here is another version of the letter:
Yeah, he banged a younger chick. Don't sweat it, Mama Ganjaji is
carving her own nubile slice. She just wasn't dumb enough to nail a
folower, so she gets to keep the house with the big-screen TV
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your impressions. The language form she uses is clearly
meant to shift states of awareness. It would work better in a room
where you didn't have other entertainment options pulling at you, I
suspect.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Oct 12, 2006, at 5:10 PM, abutilon108 wrote:
I had been quite captivated by her for some time, but finally came to
feel that she had a way of producing experiences in people which they
took for awakening. Of
Rick,
Did you ever meet with her? What is your opinion of her? She is on
our local cable channels in DC. I guess her Mississippi background
gives her a pass on the sloow talking, but I find it impossible to
listen to her for very long to find out what she is up to. The people
she is on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick,
Did you ever meet with her? What is your opinion of her? She is on
our local cable channels in DC. I guess her Mississippi background
gives her a pass on the sloow talking, but I find it impossible
Thanks John.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
Rick,
Did you ever meet with her? What is your opinion of her? She is on
our local cable channels in DC. I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks John.
I can see where those types of 'pointing out' conversations could be
useful for some. She seems to have a good effect on folks caught in the
purification to transcend duality. She's many peoples
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Scandal hits Gangaji
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick,
Did you ever meet with her? What is your opinion of her? She is on
our local cable channels in DC. I guess
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com
, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
Rick,
Did you ever meet with her? What is your opinion of her? She
is on
our
Who is Gangaji...is he somehow connected to Amma?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Gangaji Foundation Community,
It is possible that you have already heard about a
heartbreaking
disclosure within our community. As the Executive Director
68 matches
Mail list logo
