biosoundbill wrote:
Hi Bhairitu,
As far As the `M' and `NG' endings go, I don't really know which
ones are the most powerful.
My TM mantra ends in `NG,' but I know lots of people who were
given `M' ending mantras. I often feel that MMY used both just to
make up a bigger pool of mantras.
Thanks Bhairitu,
I guess at the end of the day learning TM is a very good way of
learning to meditate effortlessly. It has certainly become a big
business, and one is never quite sure as to whether MMY's motives
are noble or otherwise!
Once one has the technique, it makes sense to me that one
biosoundbill wrote:
Thanks Bhairitu,
I guess at the end of the day learning TM is a very good way of
learning to meditate effortlessly. It has certainly become a big
business, and one is never quite sure as to whether MMY's motives
are noble or otherwise!
Once one has the technique, it
Comment below:
**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
biosoundbill wrote:
Thanks Bhairitu,
I guess at the end of the day learning TM is a very good way of
learning to meditate effortlessly. It has certainly become a big
business, and one is never
I'm no longer involved with the TM movement, but I still have lots
of friends that are still in it. I was at a TM party recently, and
clearly felt that most of them can't think for themselves, and are
very ungrounded!
I often wonder if this is because of all those years of meditating
on a
biosoundbill wrote:
I'm no longer involved with the TM movement, but I still have lots
of friends that are still in it. I was at a TM party recently, and
clearly felt that most of them can't think for themselves, and are
very ungrounded!
I often wonder if this is because of all those
The Yoga of Sound by Russill Paul
Google Tantric Deity Bija Mantras Shakti yoga
It's the last result on page 1 - The Yoga of Sound: Healing
Enlightenment Through the Sacred ... - Google Books Result
Read from p91 to 97
Namaste,
Billy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016
mainstream20016@ wrote:
Curtis, this is addressed to you and I'm sure you will respond,
Michael (t3rinity), this is part of a really excellent group of
discussion threads that you are participating in with Turq,
Mainstream, Curtis, etc.; thanks bunches for it. The points you
articulate resonate with my experience, feelings, and (I guess)
beliefs.
Hope to drop in later with
nablusoss1008 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also it is very non-traditional to not use Om (omkara) with the
mantra.
Which is even a greater controversy since MMY got the idea that it
causes poverty but look at all the Indian
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nablusoss1008 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
Also it is very non-traditional to not use Om (omkara) with the
mantra.
Which is even a greater controversy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The question I would have is: Who has the free will? Very much, what
we consider ourselves to be, is just a bundle of desires impressions,
reactions etc. This is how most people define themselves. They say:
this is who I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
My sense of self is a given I guess. I'm down with Decartes'
first principle.
But as TM checking (the stealth Mahavakya) clearly shows, Decartes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
My sense of self is a given I guess. I'm down with Decartes'
I'm a fairly clear channel for my God
Double uh oh.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
do.rflx wrote:
I look at the quantity of people like myself in that seemingly
'unique' and 'special' time frame who were 'lost' in the darker side
of the
Bronte writes:
As we are ALL channels for our God, Curtis. In my view, we each have a higher
self, our own personal God, or you could say, our ego in its most pure
individualized state. Our human bodies and personalities are channels for that
being, as well as for God in the universal
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bronte writes:
As we are ALL channels for our God, Curtis.
What you mean we whiteman? (Old Tonto joke reference)
In my view, we each have a higher self, our own personal God, or you
could say, our ego in its
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have the right to say anything you want. When you say I am God
I have the right to say Uh oh. I have my reasons.
Or not. Most reasons are rationalizations, as brain research suggests.
What you think to be 'my
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
TM gave us something. But that was the thing that was always free
to us anyway, had we only known where to look. It's something that
still waits for us, never demanding we pay a toll. It's there for the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
You have the right to say anything you want. When you say I am God
I have the right to say Uh oh. I have my reasons.
Or not. Most
Bhairitu wrote:
Gods, BTW, are just personifications of the subtle fields
that sages experienced in meditation. They were personified
so that the ordinary person could conceptualize them.
You got it backwards, once again, Mr. Bharat2. The Vedic Devas
are the personifications of the forces
Ordinary village people don't have a problem with conceptualizing
persons as heroes or devatas.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JWPTtJ-Z4lU
The ordinary Village People speak out.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bhairitu wrote:
Gods, BTW,
First of all: Thanks for your answer Curtis. My comments follow.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ordinary village people don't have a problem with conceptualizing
persons as heroes or devatas.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JWPTtJ-Z4lU
The ordinary Village People speak out.
I don't get it.
This video is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all: Thanks for your answer Curtis. My comments follow.
Likewise. I'm sure I'll learn something.
Snip
Me the opposite, I use them for my art.
T: When you say: 'I use them for my art' you obviously feel in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Because when my world view crashed, it left but one thing behind. It
left my Isness. I found that I'm immortal, that I'm always joined with
God. Nothing can ever sever me unless I give it permission.
I remember
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all: Thanks for your answer Curtis. My comments follow.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
brontebaxter8@ wrote:
snip
Because when my world view crashed, it left but one thing behind. It
left my Isness. I found that I'm immortal, that I'm
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Curtis, this is addressed to you and I'm sure you will respond,
but.may I ?
Trinity3, why would you doubt that he doesn't feel independent of
unconscious processes,
and that he uses them (uncoscious processes)
On Oct 15, 2007, at 4:30 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JWPTtJ-Z4lU
The ordinary Village People speak out.
Can't Stop the Silliness. :)
Sal
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016
mainstream20016@ wrote:
Curtis, this is addressed to you and I'm sure you will respond,
but.may I ?
Trinity3, why would you doubt that he doesn't feel
---Hsuan Hua on fate:
Most people are of the opinion that a person's fate has a fixed
arrangement. This is illustrated by the saying, When one's fate only
allows for eight feet, it's difficult to seek for ten. Not bad!
However, this is only spoken with reference to ordinary people. If
one is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also it is very non-traditional to not use Om (omkara) with the
mantra.
Which is even a greater controversy since MMY got the idea that it
causes poverty but look at all the Indian millionaires who practice
33 matches
Mail list logo
