Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is being a drama queen the opposite of being enlightened?

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 11:18 AM, authfriend  wrote:

> **
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> 
>
> > The literature of enlightenment is, interestingly, *not* full
> > of tales of drama queens.
>
> Tell ya something else it isn't full of either: tales of
> self-inflated assholes prattling endlessly about how much
> more spiritual they are than the folks they don't like.
>
>
The opening line of King Baby Barry is what attracted me - *"**Anticipating
a flood of drama queenery today.."*, his inane, insane, insipid
predictions, his fantasized, fictitious, mental battles..LOL..reminds me of
my own childhood when I fought imaginary battles to comfort myself
with thieves, demons, ruffians, I had to, because I was helpless,
vulnerable, defenseless against the big, bad, unseen enemy. After I would
get tired, I would go sleep next to my mommy seeking her solace, protection
and love.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lindsay Lohan-- An Accident Waiting to Happen

[Ravi Chivukula]

Dear Aunt Share,
I saw your post, sorry couldn't reply right away because I have been in
a deep contemplative mood (:-)) for the past couple of days after
goading, insulting and slaying Amma zombies and bots on the battlefield
that was the comments page of her Rolling Stone article, heeding to a
plea of a friend who felt the Amma bots were slandering her.
I'm glad you realize that this task is right up your nephew's alley.
Lindsey can have Ravi's love and words of wisdom, but, but - (I will do
my best King Baby Barry impersonation here).."Bt...keep your hands
off me lady, I'm not interested. Take your needy, drama queenery
elsewhere...OK?"
P.S. The lovely Rosathea IS on my mind.
Love,Ravi

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long 
wrote:
>
> Ok, Ok OK!  Forget jyotish!  Instead send, and I will pray for
him the whole time, send dearest Nephew Ravi complete with plaid shirts
and shades (are there plaid shades?) to Little Lindsey and he will
straighten her out pronto, as he did with his so blessed Auntie. 
All it took and indeed ever takes, is a well timed love, Ravi.Â
>
> Dearest Nephew, I will bombard your precious (a word destroyed for all
time IMHO by Gollum) skull with images of lovely Rosathea so that the
Silly Hollywood Hussy is no temptation at all.  Take her for ice
cream, maybe pink peppermint as our wise and loving Masked Zebra
prescribes.Â
>
>
> There, Lindsey Lohan, saved by the collaborative efforts of FFL. 
Yay!
>
>
> PS  Oy!  Very bad insomnia last night.  Share brain very
fuzzy.  Does it show?  OTOH, probably full Moon approaching.Â
>
> PS 2Â  Nephew, we will consult expert to find best time for your
Lohan rescue mission.
>
>
>
> 
>  From: raunchydog raunchydog@...
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 2:19 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lindsay Lohan-- An Accident Waiting to
Happen
>
>
> Â
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote:
> >
> > Fuck, that must be what's happening to me.   I'm headed to
Dennis Flaherty at some point in the near future.  Still remember
that. ÂÂ
> >
>
> Screw Dennis, soothsayers, swarmy swamies and all their hair brain
advice and mucho dineros you'll pay to avoid inevitable doom. Accept
your fate with a happy heart. Psychiatric help five cents.
>
> > 
> >  From: John jr_esq@
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 7:40 PM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lindsay Lohan-- An Accident Waiting to
Happen
> >
> >
> > ÂÂ
> > She needs to learn how to transcend her weaknesses.  If not, she
will go through a vicious cycle of suffering.
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn 
wrote:
> > >
> > > God help her help herself. ÂÂÂ
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> > >  From: Share Long 
> > > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:43 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Lindsay Lohan-- An Accident Waiting
to Happen
> > >
> > >
> > > ÂÂÂ
> > > Feed birds on Wednesday?  Request rahu pujas or
yagyas?  Wear kavach?  Or
hessonite?  Daily recitation of prayer to Rahu:
> > > I pray to Rahu having half a body, of great bravery, the eclipser
of the Moon and the Sun, born of Simhikaa.
> > >
> > > Go on Mother Divine for 18 years?ÂÂÂ
> > > Laughing, but that might also help the Moon.
> > >
> > > Last but not least, support rahu like people. 
Wonder what that would be.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> > >  From: John 
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 2:25 PM
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Lindsay Lohan-- An Accident Waiting to
Happen
> > >
> > >
> > > ÂÂÂ
> > > Lindsay has several planets that are weak--technically called
Atmakaraka Dosha--and are contributing to her troubles.
> > >
> > >
http://omg.yahoo.com/news/lindsay-lohan-banned-from-chateau-marmont-afte\
r-failing-to-pay-a-whopping--46-000-bill-.html
> > >
> > > Specifically, she has the
> > >
> > > 1.  Conjunction of the Moon and Rahu which is the main cause of
her compulsive and obsessive behaviour.  Since Rahu is in the 11th house
from her karakamsa, her friends are contributing to her troubles.
> > >
> > > 2.  Venus is weak which is placed in the navamsha of Aquarius. 
This is causing her problems with cars on public roads which resulted in
DUI convictions and jail time.
> > >
> > > 3.  Mercury is also weak and placed in the navamsha of Aries. 
Jaimini's Upadesha has termed this combination as one who is "lacking
mother's milk".  Thus, we find Lindsay indulging in alcoholic beverages.
> > >
> > > She is now running the major period of Rahu which will last for 18
years.  As such, She needs to consult a jyotishi to find a solution to
her problems.
> > >
> > > JR
> > >
> >
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lindsay Lohan-- An Accident Waiting to Happen

[Ravi Chivukula]

Oh..and you said...*" Take her for ice cream, maybe pink peppermint as our
wise and loving Masked Zebra prescribes"*

I would love to do that, but I can only wish, fantasize now, as she is
married to that bastard Casaboun, who has trapped her. I'm just waiting for
him to die - so Rosathea to make that dreaded choice of leaving Casaboun's
wealth, and his wealth of dead beliefs, dead scriptures. Have I made my
case to my beloved Rosathea? I don't know - but I certainly have tried my
best.

Oh my gentle, kind, sweet, Auntie - it's never as easy in life as it is in
those stories.

Love,
Ravi

On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Ravi Chivukula wrote:

> **
>
>
> Dear Aunt Share,
>
> I saw your post, sorry couldn't reply right away because I have been in a
> deep contemplative mood (:-)) for the past couple of days after goading,
> insulting and slaying Amma zombies and bots on the battlefield that was the
> comments page of her Rolling Stone article, heeding to a plea of a friend
> who felt the Amma bots were slandering her.
>
> I'm glad you realize that this task is right up your nephew's alley.
> Lindsey can have Ravi's love and words of wisdom, but, but - (I will do my
> best King Baby Barry impersonation here)..*"Bt...keep your hands off
> me lady, I'm not interested. Take your needy, drama queenery
> elsewhere...OK?"*
>
> P.S. The lovely Rosathea IS on my mind.
>
> Love,
> Ravi
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> >
> > Ok, Ok OK!  Forget jyotish!  Instead send, and I will pray for him the
> whole time, send dearest Nephew Ravi complete with plaid shirts and shades
> (are there plaid shades?) to Little Lindsey and he will straighten her out
> pronto, as he did with his so blessed Auntie.  All it took and indeed ever
> takes, is a well timed love, Ravi.Â
> >
> > Dearest Nephew, I will bombard your precious (a word destroyed for all
> time IMHO by Gollum) skull with images of lovely Rosathea so that the Silly
> Hollywood Hussy is no temptation at all.  Take her for ice cream, maybe
> pink peppermint as our wise and loving Masked Zebra prescribes.Â
> >
> >
> > There, Lindsey Lohan, saved by the collaborative efforts of FFL.  Yay!
> >
> >
> > PS  Oy!  Very bad insomnia last night.  Share brain very fuzzy.Â
> Does it show?  OTOH, probably full Moon approaching.Â
> >
> > PS 2Â  Nephew, we will consult expert to find best time for your Lohan
> rescue mission.
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> > From: raunchydog raunchydog@...
>
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 2:19 AM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lindsay Lohan-- An Accident Waiting to
> Happen
> >
> >
> > Â
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Fuck, that must be what's happening to me.   I'm headed to Dennis
> Flaherty at some point in the near future.  Still remember that. ÂÂ
>
> > >
> >
> > Screw Dennis, soothsayers, swarmy swamies and all their hair brain
> advice and mucho dineros you'll pay to avoid inevitable doom. Accept your
> fate with a happy heart. Psychiatric help five cents.
> >
> > > 
> > > From: John jr_esq@
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 7:40 PM
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lindsay Lohan-- An Accident Waiting to
> Happen
> > >
> > >
> > > ÂÂ
> > > She needs to learn how to transcend her weaknesses. If not, she will
> go through a vicious cycle of suffering.
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > God help her help herself. ÂÂÂ
>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > From: Share Long 
> > > > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:43 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Lindsay Lohan-- An Accident Waiting to
> Happen
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ÂÂÂ
> > > > Feed birds on Wednesday?  Request rahu pujas or
> yagyas?  Wear kavach?  Or hessonite?  Daily
> recitation of prayer to Rahu:
>
> > > > I pray to Rahu having half a body, of great bravery, the eclipser of
> the Moon and the Sun, born of Simhikaa.
> > > >
> > &

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lindsay Lohan-- An Accident Waiting to Happen

[Ravi Chivukula]

Oh and one more thing Auntie.

With respect to my statement..*" past couple of days after goading,
insulting and slaying Amma zombies and bots on the battlefield"*

You will proud dear Auntie, the kind of language your Nephew used to insult
them was all rated G for modern, progressive, liberal audiences, no Ravi
Yogi's crude, coarse, vulgar, insulting, say hello to Ravi Chivukula, the
harshest words I used were "fool" and "baby" and the one among many of the
phrases I used to insult them was this gem *"your dhoti-wearing,
doll-clutching drollery"*.

Thanks to the old man, Judy, and all others for the lessons learned on FFL.

Love,
Ravi


On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Ravi Chivukula wrote:

> Oh..and you said...*" Take her for ice cream, maybe pink peppermint as
> our wise and loving Masked Zebra prescribes"*
>
> I would love to do that, but I can only wish, fantasize now, as she is
> married to that bastard Casaboun, who has trapped her. I'm just waiting for
> him to die - so Rosathea to make that dreaded choice of leaving Casaboun's
> wealth, and his wealth of dead beliefs, dead scriptures. Have I made my
> case to my beloved Rosathea? I don't know - but I certainly have tried my
> best.
>
> Oh my gentle, kind, sweet, Auntie - it's never as easy in life as it is in
> those stories.
>
> Love,
> Ravi
>
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> Dear Aunt Share,
>>
>> I saw your post, sorry couldn't reply right away because I have been in a
>> deep contemplative mood (:-)) for the past couple of days after goading,
>> insulting and slaying Amma zombies and bots on the battlefield that was the
>> comments page of her Rolling Stone article, heeding to a plea of a friend
>> who felt the Amma bots were slandering her.
>>
>> I'm glad you realize that this task is right up your nephew's alley.
>> Lindsey can have Ravi's love and words of wisdom, but, but - (I will do my
>> best King Baby Barry impersonation here)..*"Bt...keep your hands off
>> me lady, I'm not interested. Take your needy, drama queenery
>> elsewhere...OK?"*
>>
>> P.S. The lovely Rosathea IS on my mind.
>>
>> Love,
>> Ravi
>>
>>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>> >
>> > Ok, Ok OK!  Forget jyotish!  Instead send, and I will pray for him
>> the whole time, send dearest Nephew Ravi complete with plaid shirts and
>> shades (are there plaid shades?) to Little Lindsey and he will straighten
>> her out pronto, as he did with his so blessed Auntie.  All it took and
>> indeed ever takes, is a well timed love, Ravi.Â
>> >
>> > Dearest Nephew, I will bombard your precious (a word destroyed for all
>> time IMHO by Gollum) skull with images of lovely Rosathea so that the Silly
>> Hollywood Hussy is no temptation at all.  Take her for ice cream, maybe
>> pink peppermint as our wise and loving Masked Zebra prescribes.Â
>> >
>> >
>> > There, Lindsey Lohan, saved by the collaborative efforts of FFL.  Yay!
>> >
>> >
>> > PS  Oy!  Very bad insomnia last night.  Share brain very fuzzy.Â
>> Does it show?  OTOH, probably full Moon approaching.Â
>> >
>> > PS 2Â  Nephew, we will consult expert to find best time for your Lohan
>> rescue mission.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 
>> > From: raunchydog raunchydog@...
>>
>> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
>> > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 2:19 AM
>> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lindsay Lohan-- An Accident Waiting to
>> Happen
>> >
>> >
>> > Â
>> >
>> >
>> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Fuck, that must be what's happening to me.   I'm headed to Dennis
>> Flaherty at some point in the near future.  Still remember that. ÂÂ
>>
>> > >
>> >
>> > Screw Dennis, soothsayers, swarmy swamies and all their hair brain
>> advice and mucho dineros you'll pay to avoid inevitable doom. Accept your
>> fate with a happy heart. Psychiatric help five cents.
>> >
>> > > 
>> > > From: John jr_esq@
>> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
>> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 7:40 PM
>> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lindsay Lohan-- An Accident Waiting to
>> Happen

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: mind boggling

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 4:01 PM, authfriend  wrote:

> **
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater  wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
> 
>
> > > You meant *Vaj's* family, of course (and never used the
> > > word "us"). But either Barry was so taken in by his own
> > > delusions about you that he really thought you were
> > > referring to "your fellow cultists" as "family," or he
> > > was hoping to invoke the image of the murderous Manson
> > > Family in the minds of readers.
> >
> > Ohhh, I meant Vaj's real family, blood relatives and ex inlaws.
> > God, thank goodness you are here Judy, truth-seeker, to clear
> > these things up. I guess I should have said Vaj's family. I'll
> > be much more specific in the future.
>
> Hey, you made it explicit in your follow-up today. I was
> just commenting on Barry's idiocy in his response to that
> earlier post.
>
> I doubt anybody fell for his misdirection yesterday in any
> case.
>
>  __
>

Oh please Judy, for factual accuracy..it should be  "I doubt anybody fell
for his misdirection yesterday in any case , except King Baby's groupies
(Susan, dumbazgrey, Marek) and his moral, spiritual authority - His
Holiness, throw in Steve, Xeno and Edg depending on factors such as how St.
Louis performed, family pressures,  neo-advaita platitudic winds, senility
flareups"

Lovingly,
Ravi

Re: [FairfieldLife] I've finally figured out why I post and lurk on FFL...

[Ravi Chivukula]

Thanks to Robin for posting that video - I have become a crazy fan of
Henri, can't stop smiling :-). I have even liked Henri's Facebook page -

On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Emily Reyn  wrote:

> **
>
>
> Kinda comforting is the way it often translates to me.  I mean le chat,
> Henri, almost had me laughing and crying at the same time.
>
>   --
> *From:* sparaig 
> *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Saturday, September 1, 2012 9:24 PM
> *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] I've finally figured out why I post and lurk
> on FFL...
>
>
> It makes my crazy life seem sane by comparison.
>
> L.
>
>
>
>   
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lindsay Lohan-- An Accident Waiting to Happen

[Ravi Chivukula]

Dear Lawson,

May I please kindly request you to stop interfering in your our family
issues.

Well you may say this is a public list, but you may or may not know the
Long's and Ladisgate's mistrust of each other, the bitterness, the acrimony
extends back to 400 years. My Auntie and I have been reunited after a long
time, but we are keeping this a secret for now because of the love, duty.
commitment to each of our respective families. Though I will say Ladisgates
have been slighted by Longs, just because I'm a dark skinned Indian doesn't
cut it and Aunt Share knows this injustice well. I'm the progeny of their
seeds spread to India and my skin color darkened by the hot sun of South
India doesn't mean I am not a proud member of the Ladisgate clan.

Lawson, please I beg you don't further sow the seeds of mistrust, hatred
among us. A little respect for our sacrifice, suffering, pain is what I'm
begging from you.

Love,
Ravi

On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 8:19 AM, sparaig  wrote:

> **
>
>
> "Mood-making" in TM-speak refers to trying to pretend to yourself (and/or
> others) that you are enlightened by attempting to behave in the way you
> think someone who is enlightened behaves.
>
> There's nothing wrong with "mood-making" per se, only with the TM-related
> version, which is counter-enlightenment, since enlightenment includes being
> fully spontaneous at all times, simply by its very nature.
>
> L
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn 
> wrote:
> >
> > Share: Is there something wrong with "mood making?" Â For example,
> music, art, meditation, incense, candles, poetry, movies, only thinking
> "happy, happy" thoughts, all function to "mood make." Â
> >
> >
> > 
> > From: Share Long 
>
> > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" 
> > Sent: Sunday, September 2, 2012 4:28 AM
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lindsay Lohan-- An Accident Waiting to
> Happen
> >
> >
> > Â
> > dearest Nephewji,
> >
> > I am indeed SO proud of your restraint language wise as well as all your
> efforts to make the world safe for not bots, if we may call them that.Â
> Have I followed the thread closely enough, do you think?  Is Auntie making
> sense here?  Your dear old Auntie can get so discombobulated in the FFL
> maze!  BTW, very nice your gratitude to Judy et al.
> >
> > Now Auntie will become a little Auntie Mame ish to say: screw the
> stories.  If you know what I mean.  Stories only appear easy.  And that,
> only in the short run.  Ah, exhausted now from expounding so much
> wisdom. Â
> >
> > Yes yes Rosathea is your mantra now.  Auntie can relax.
> > Big Hug
> >
> > PS  Please please do to take good care of Ravi self.  Get good rest.Â
> Healthy delicious food.  Exercise in sunshine.  No synthetic clothes.Â
> Even if beloved plaid.  No texting while driving, etc.  Think happy happy
> thoughts.  But otoh NO MOOD MAKING!Â
> >
> >
> > Thank you for making Auntie smile
> >
> >
> > 
> > From: Ravi Chivukula 
>
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Saturday, September 1, 2012 2:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lindsay Lohan-- An Accident Waiting to
> Happen
> >
> >
> > Â
> > Oh and one more thing Auntie.
> >
> > With respect to my statement.." past couple of days after
> goading, insulting and slaying Amma zombies and bots on the
> battlefield"
> >
> > You will proud dear Auntie, the kind of language your Nephew used to
> insult them was all rated G for modern, progressive, liberal audiences, no
> Ravi Yogi's crude, coarse, vulgar, insulting, say hello to Ravi Chivukula,
> the harshest words I used were "fool" and "baby" and the one among many of
> the phrases I used to insult them was this gem "your dhoti-wearing,
> doll-clutching drollery".
> >
> > Thanks to the old man, Judy, and all others for the lessons learned on
> FFL.
> >
> > Love,
> > Ravi
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
> >
> > Oh..and you said..." Take her for ice cream, maybe pink peppermint as
> our wise and loving Masked Zebra prescribes"
> > >
> > >
> > >I would love to do that, but I can only wish, fantasize now, as she is
> married to that bastard Casaboun, who has trapped her. I'm just waiting for
> him to die - so Rosathea to make that dreaded choice of leaving Casaboun's
> weal

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lindsay Lohan-- An Accident Waiting to Happen

[Ravi Chivukula]

Dear Lawson,
May I please kindly request you to stop interfering in our family
issues.
Well you may say this is a public list, but you may or may not know the
Long's and Ladisgate's mistrust of each other, the bitterness, the
acrimony extends back to 400 years. My Auntie and I have been reunited
after a long time, but we are keeping this a secret for now because of
the love, duty. commitment to each of our respective families. Though I
will say Ladisgates have been slighted by Longs, just because I'm a dark
skinned Indian doesn't cut it and Aunt Share knows this injustice well.
I'm the progeny of their seeds spread to India and my skin color
darkened by the hot sun of South India doesn't mean I am not a proud
member of the Ladisgate clan.
Lawson, please I beg you don't further sow the seeds of mistrust, hatred
among us. A little respect for our sacrifice, suffering, pain is what
I'm begging from you.
Love,Ravi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig"  wrote:
>
> "Mood-making" in TM-speak refers to trying to pretend to yourself
(and/or others) that you are enlightened by attempting to behave in the
way you think someone who is enlightened behaves.
>
> There's nothing wrong with "mood-making" per se, only with the
TM-related version, which is counter-enlightenment, since enlightenment
includes being fully spontaneous at all times, simply by its very
nature.
>
> L
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote:
> >
> > Share: Is there something wrong with "mood making?" Â For
example, music, art, meditation, incense, candles, poetry, movies, only
thinking "happy, happy" thoughts, all function to "mood make." Â
> >
> >
> > 
> >  From: Share Long sharelong60@
> > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Sunday, September 2, 2012 4:28 AM
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lindsay Lohan-- An Accident Waiting
to Happen
> >
> >
> > Â
> > dearest Nephewji,
> >
> > I am indeed SO proud of your restraint language wise as well as all
your efforts to make the world safe for not bots, if we may call them
that.  Have I followed the thread closely enough, do you think? 
Is Auntie making sense here?  Your dear old Auntie can get so
discombobulated in the FFL maze!  BTW, very nice your gratitude to
Judy et al.
> >
> > Now Auntie will become a little Auntie Mame ish to say: screw the
stories.  If you know what I mean.  Stories only appear
easy.  And that, only in the short run.  Ah, exhausted now from
expounding so much wisdom. Â
> >
> > Yes yes Rosathea is your mantra now.  Auntie can relax.
> > Big Hug
> >
> > PS  Please please do to take good care of Ravi self.  Get
good rest.  Healthy delicious food.  Exercise in sunshine. 
No synthetic clothes.  Even if beloved plaid.  No texting while
driving, etc.  Think happy happy thoughts.  But otoh NO MOOD
MAKING!Â
> >
> >
> > Thank you for making Auntie smile
> >
> >
> > 
> >  From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Saturday, September 1, 2012 2:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lindsay Lohan-- An Accident Waiting
to Happen
> >
> >
> > Â
> > Oh and one more thing Auntie.
> >
> > With respect to my statement.." past couple of days after
goading, insulting and slaying Amma zombies and bots on the
battlefield"
> >
> > You will proud dear Auntie, the kind of language your Nephew used to
insult them was all rated G for modern, progressive, liberal audiences,
no Ravi Yogi's crude, coarse, vulgar, insulting, say hello to Ravi
Chivukula, the harshest words I used were "fool" and "baby" and the one
among many of the phrases I used to insult them was this gem "your
dhoti-wearing, doll-clutching drollery".
> >
> > Thanks to the old man, Judy, and all others for the lessons learned
on FFL.
> >
> > Love,
> > Ravi
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@
wrote:
> >
> > Oh..and you said..." Take her for ice cream, maybe pink peppermint
as our wise and loving Masked Zebra prescribes"
> > >
> > >
> > >I would love to do that, but I can only wish, fantasize now, as she
is married to that bastard Casaboun, who has trapped her. I'm just
waiting for him to die - so Rosathea to make that dreaded choice of
leaving Casaboun's wealth, and his wealth of dead beliefs, dead
scriptures. Have I made my case to my beloved Ro

Re: [FairfieldLife] Oh mon dieu, mon amour Henri

[Ravi Chivukula]

God I'm so happy for Henri !!!

Some famous quotes of Henri from the article.

"Am I supposed to be excited that the world has made one more rotation? We
are hurtling through space, yet going nowhere."

"Once, after an abundance of catnip, I hallucinated that I was ascending to
the heavens and touching the whiskers of God. I woke up on top of the
refrigerator."


On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Emily Reyn  wrote:

> **
>
>
>
> Ah, Henri, the existential cat extraordinaire is on the front page of the
> Seattle Times this AM.  Is it too early to take a cat nap?
>
> http://seattletimes.com/html/home/index.html
>
>  
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

Dear Barry Baby,

Well I hope your buddy just sticks to his writing on his way to
rehabilitating himself - I don't think there is any dispute on his writing
skills.

I'm watching, I'm sure the old man and Judy are as well. I don't know about
them but the minute your buddy tries to wade into any kind of spiritual,
moral, ethical, intelligent voice here, I will methodically, ruthlessly,
mercilessly rip him apart assuming he will continue along on his clueless,
charade of his past trickery here. No sir - no Mayan Messiah of Morons, no
Maitreya of Morons getting a free pass from me.

So remember that.

Love,
Ravi

On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 7:55 AM, turquoiseb  wrote:

> **
>
>
> All of this writing just *has* to be a book, Curtis.
>
> The world really needs it.
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
>
>  wrote:
> >
> > Crowds of people are like schools of fish. They swim by an outside
> performer with the mentality of a single entity. The trick for a busker
> is to break them out of the trance so they will pay attention to me.
> "Pay" is the key word here. I need them to stop their internal dialog
> long enough to extract something green and crisp from their wallets and
> purses.
> >
> > Bring on the children! They are perfect for this agenda. Easily
> distracted by novel things in the environment (me and my instruments),
> and lacking the intense internal dialog of having mortgage payments and
> making it to their car before the meter maid, they are ideal
> co-conspirators. I invite them up with maracas so they can join the
> show. Parents get it right away, artistic enrichment for the center of
> their universe. Now that the stage is set, I have something hidden to
> show you.
> >
> > She was one of those little girls with something extra, the sparkle of
> magnetic charisma. I see plenty of them coming out of the good homes in
> Northern Virginia. The right schools, plenty of vitamin D enriched milk,
> and tons of confidence to project a beamer of a smile full of
> orthodontist approved, well-flossed teeth. She was around eleven. Her
> brown hair was pulled into a loose pony tail by some fluorescent pink
> scrunchy fabric. The only thing out of the ordinary was that she
> crowded me a bit after she got her maraca. Younger kids will do this,
> and as the Mayor of Munchkin Land, it is up to me to get them to back
> off and give me some performance space. Decking one of the kids with my
> heavy steel resonator guitar in one of my tip inspiring flourishes,
> leaving them cold cocked on the boardwalk, would definitely cut into
> profits. But a girl this age usually keeps her distance, so it got my
> attention that she was standing very close to me with one side of her
> body.
> >
> > I swiveled my head and my eyes caught something that instantly put me
> on red alert. The arm she was crowding me with was cut off right below
> the elbow and she was using me to shield it from the audience. Her arm
> was not this way from birth. Something sinister and terrible had done
> this, and it left a fiery red zipper of violated flesh. Our eyes met and
> I gave her a nod. We were thick as thieves in an instant and she
> relaxed into a nervous giggle. Like a Sicilian made-man, I was bonded
> to her through omerta. It was a matter of trust, and I felt it in my
> chest.
> >
> > We began to play close like Sonny and a miniature Cher. People
> probably thought she was my niece or something, who else would play
> together with this familiarity? Her father was all smiles. She was a
> brave kid, this is not easy performing in front of strangers. A crowd
> formed supporting the cute little girl and the bluesman. They had no
> clue to the fierceness of her jagged asymmetry. She kept herself
> sideways, showing the world who she wanted to be, and they bought it. At
> the song's end she shot me a conspiratorial look. I sensed something
> gritty in those eyes. A steeliness forged by the fires of pediatric
> ward hell. I wondered about her mom and dad, who had spent the hours in
> the hospital making the painful decisions that lead to this. Oh
> bullshit, I have no idea. She ran off back to her dad. His look
> combined sincere thanks with "you have no idea". Or maybe I just read
> all that in myself, it is so hard to tell sometimes. When our eyes met I
> forgot to breath for a moment. I saw people moving in with tips in slow
> motion.
> >
> > Someday I hope she finds a real stand up guy. A guy who will always
> take her left side, and wrapping his arm around her far shoulder, will
> press her close, feeling her arm halfway across his own back, and she
> will feel safe and brave, facing the world.
> >
>
>  
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Why do people form cliques?

[Ravi Chivukula]

Dear Barry Baby

You opined* - " Immediately after after the minor clique-ist proposed his
Enemies List, the clique leader responded, not only stroking the first
clique-ist for dissing these eight people, but dissing them even further,
suggesting that they lacked the spiritual, moral, emotional, and
intellectual intelligence to...wait for it...see things the way she does. "*

Seriously you got all that Yahoo's message view - sometimes I underestimate
your skills.

Anyway it's not cliques - it's a coterie, a coterie of cogent, coherent,
compelling mavericks.

Love,
Ravi


On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:48 AM, turquoiseb  wrote:

> **
>
>
> My day started with young Maya doing her Sunday morning routine, and
> asking me to show her "moovees" on my "competer." We chose a couple of
> episodes of a British kids' show "Charlie and Lola." It's pretty good,
> seemingly based on a series of very popular books written and
> illustrated by Lauren Child.
>
> I can see why they're popular. They are aimed at an audience aged 3 to
> 7, and they speak to this audience about real-life situations that a
> person of that age might encounter. Lola is an inquisitive girl, Charlie
> is her protective older brother, and their parents are never seen, so
> they have to figure out how to handle these situations *on their own*.
> This is what I consider the secret of these books' and this series'
> success -- it teaches *self-sufficiency*.
>
> Synchronistically, the second episode we watched was about Lola having
> to deal with her first experience with cliques. A group of kids, both
> girls and boys, took a disliking to her on the playground and decided to
> gang up on her and diss her. As you might expect, if you have ever had
> any experience with cliques, most of the dialog was spoken by the
> clique. One of them -- the girl who ran the clique -- would diss Lola,
> and then the others would pile on, one by one. As they did, the clique
> leader would praise them, so then they'd all do it again.
>
> Lola mainly didn't reply, and instead wandered off to another part of
> the playground, where she ran into her brother Charlie. She explained
> the situation to him, and he -- wise beyond his years -- asked her to
> turn and look at the clique members, who were across the playground
> *still* dissing her, even though they knew they couldn't be heard by
> anyone outside the clique.
>
> "Look at them, Lola," said Charlie. "Do they look happy? Would you ever
> really want *any* of them as your friend?" Lola looked, shook her head
> "No," and smiled. Just then her best friend Lotta came up and they went
> off to play together, laughing, the clique and their taunts forgotten,
> washed away like...like...like a line drawn through water.
>
> Maya seemed to like it, even though she's been fortunate enough to have
> been spared exposure to cliques so far. Looking at her I thought, "When
> you are, I suspect you'll be self-sufficient enough to not let them get
> to you."
>
> And *that* thought, interestingly enough, was the genesis of this
> particular cafe rap, and the answer to the koan posed in its Subject
> line.
>
> I think that the answer to that koan is: "People form cliques because
> they're not self-sufficient."
>
> Either that, or "Mu." Your call. :-)
>
> People who tend to form into cliques do so in my opinion because they're
> not comfortable with themselves. Or their selves. Whatever. So they
> clump together with others who are just as uncomfortable with their
> selves, and they stroke each other so that they won't feel so
> uncomfortable.
>
> Sometimes that "stroking off" takes the form of:
> "Wow. Did you see the latest Lady Gaga video? Isn't she cool?"
> "Yeah, she sure is cool."
> "Very cool."
> "And aren't we cool to be able to see her coolness?"
> "Sure am glad WE'RE so cool!"
>
> Other times it takes the form of:
> "Wow. Isn't that skank Missy such a...such a skank?"
> "Yeah, she sure is a skank."
> "Major skank."
> "And a bad dresser, too."
> "Yeah, a major skank bad dresser."
> "Sure am glad WE'RE not like Missy!"
>
> My theory of why people form into cliques may be simplistic, but
> hey!...we're talking about people who form into cliques. You can't get
> much deeper than simplistic when discussing them. :-)
>
> But I think I'm onto something with it.
>
> The people in cliques don't identify with Self. Because they're so
> uncomfortable with their selves, they don't even identify with *them*,
> either. They can only feel comfortable when they're surrounded by a
> bunch of people who are stroking them off. Sounds kinda kinky to me --
> kinda like a ménage à many -- but if that's what gets them off, so
> be it.
>
> But one of the things I don't understand is WHY, having formed the
> clique to stroke each other off when they agree on things or people they
> like, as in the first bit of dialogue above, they stroke each other off
> by ganging up on the things or people they *don't* like? If they're
> getting everything they need from

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 3:04 PM, curtisdeltablues  wrote:

> **
>
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Barry Baby,
> >
> > Well I hope your buddy just sticks to his writing on his way to
> > rehabilitating himself - I don't think there is any dispute on his
> writing
> > skills.
> >
> > I'm watching, I'm sure the old man and Judy are as well. I don't know
> about
> > them but the minute your buddy tries to wade into any kind of spiritual,
> > moral, ethical, intelligent voice here, I will methodically, ruthlessly,
> > mercilessly rip him apart assuming he will continue along on his
> clueless,
> > charade of his past trickery here. No sir - no Mayan Messiah of Morons,
> no
> > Maitreya of Morons getting a free pass from me.
> >
> > So remember that.
>
> That perfectly defines the troll agenda doesn't it?
>
>
Baby - I'm down with anything that helps your rehabilitation, I have a
special kind of love for you. Just don't, don't, you know what..:-).

Anyway this is all from the Message view that I can't but help notice. Plus
I was talking to Barry. So, Bzzzt..back off, you are not in my list of
interesting persons. Not Interested. Take your whiny, drama queenery,
elsewhere - Get it?

Love,
Ravi

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Ravi Chivukula wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 3:04 PM, curtisdeltablues <
> curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear Barry Baby,
>> >
>> > Well I hope your buddy just sticks to his writing on his way to
>> > rehabilitating himself - I don't think there is any dispute on his
>> writing
>> > skills.
>> >
>> > I'm watching, I'm sure the old man and Judy are as well. I don't know
>> about
>> > them but the minute your buddy tries to wade into any kind of spiritual,
>> > moral, ethical, intelligent voice here, I will methodically, ruthlessly,
>> > mercilessly rip him apart assuming he will continue along on his
>> clueless,
>> > charade of his past trickery here. No sir - no Mayan Messiah of Morons,
>> no
>> > Maitreya of Morons getting a free pass from me.
>> >
>> > So remember that.
>>
>> That perfectly defines the troll agenda doesn't it?
>>
>>
> Baby - I'm down with anything that helps your rehabilitation, I have a
> special kind of love for you. Just don't, don't, you know what..:-).
>
> Anyway this is all from the Message view that I can't but help notice.
> Plus I was talking to Barry. So, Bzzzt..back off, you are not in my
> list of interesting persons. Not Interested. Take your whiny, drama
> queenery, elsewhere - Get it?
>
> Love,
> Ravi
>

http://youtu.be/XpqoRhGx1rc

Love,
Ravinder Singh

Re: [FairfieldLife] Why do people form cliques?

[Ravi Chivukula]

Dear Em,

I'm glad you noticed that, I myself hesitated using that word - but just
went along with it anyway :-), you can consider it more as a writer's
liberty or flourish. Wasn't trying to exclude anyone - FFL in itself is a
coterie would be a better way to put it. The only cliques I have seen are
formed by Barry, you weren't around when I first came here in May 2010,
Barry thought I was someone who he could bully around, the arrogance and
stupidity of that man..LOL..he and his clique took such a hard beating that
he has never ever recovered from that :-)


Yes - I have been blessed with an ability to learn languages, accents very
quickly. I speak Hindi, Telugu and English - conversational at least with
barely detectable accent, as in, in an accent which is well accepted in all
these 3 languages. However lacking an arts degree and being stuck in a
corporate world I don't have two many chances to display and improve my
English vocabulary. However things changed since 2010 - FFL has greatly
helped, not to mention all the various books I read when I was young. I
spend a lot of time on Merriam Webster m-w.com, practicing
pronunciation,words, subtle differences between each of the adjectives -
pronunciation is an area which I'm a little weak in - more as in the
American pronunciations for the words which I don't use on a day to day
basis. My memory really helps, all my forefathers chanting Vedas by memory
have done the dirty work for me, I repeat something a few times and I
retain it - I think I have at least 1000 songs memorized.

My English practice went up way high these past 7 months - practicing,
articulating, vocalizing all my ideas. So there's an element of hard work
as well driven by my love for adjectives in the English language and the
need to express my ideas.

So thank you.

Love,
Ravi



On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Emily Reyn  wrote:

> **
>
>
> Don't even know that I'd agree with the "coterie" thingy, although I love
> your use of descriptive words.  You have a better command of the English
> language than many English speakers, no?  You are a smarty pants.  I'm just
> a "cool cat", ya dig?
>
>   --
> *From:* Ravi Chivukula 
> *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Sunday, September 2, 2012 3:07 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Why do people form cliques?
>
>
> Dear Barry Baby
>
> You opined* - " Immediately after after the minor clique-ist proposed his
> Enemies List, the clique leader responded, not only stroking the first
> clique-ist for dissing these eight people, but dissing them even further,
> suggesting that they lacked the spiritual, moral, emotional, and
> intellectual intelligence to...wait for it...see things the way she does.
>  "*
>
> Seriously you got all that Yahoo's message view - sometimes I
> underestimate your skills.
>
> Anyway it's not cliques - it's a coterie, a coterie of cogent, coherent,
> compelling mavericks.
>
> Love,
> Ravi
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:48 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> **
>
>  My day started with young Maya doing her Sunday morning routine, and
> asking me to show her "moovees" on my "competer." We chose a couple of
> episodes of a British kids' show "Charlie and Lola." It's pretty good,
> seemingly based on a series of very popular books written and
> illustrated by Lauren Child.
>
> I can see why they're popular. They are aimed at an audience aged 3 to
> 7, and they speak to this audience about real-life situations that a
> person of that age might encounter. Lola is an inquisitive girl, Charlie
> is her protective older brother, and their parents are never seen, so
> they have to figure out how to handle these situations *on their own*.
> This is what I consider the secret of these books' and this series'
> success -- it teaches *self-sufficiency*.
>
> Synchronistically, the second episode we watched was about Lola having
> to deal with her first experience with cliques. A group of kids, both
> girls and boys, took a disliking to her on the playground and decided to
> gang up on her and diss her. As you might expect, if you have ever had
> any experience with cliques, most of the dialog was spoken by the
> clique. One of them -- the girl who ran the clique -- would diss Lola,
> and then the others would pile on, one by one. As they did, the clique
> leader would praise them, so then they'd all do it again.
>
> Lola mainly didn't reply, and instead wandered off to another part of
> the playground, where she ran into her brother Charlie. She explained
> the situation to him, and he -- wise beyond his years -- asked her to
> turn and look at the clique me

Re: [FairfieldLife] Why do people form cliques?

[Ravi Chivukula]

Thanks Dear Em, I'm glad you liked that :-)

XOXO

On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Emily Reyn  wrote:

> **
>
>
>  "However lacking an arts degree and being stuck in a corporate
> world I don't have two many chances to display and improve my English
> vocabulary."
>
> That is an uproariously, side-splittingly, humorous lineah ha ha ha.
>
> I have "bookmarked" Maryam - could use a little help myself.  Your
> aptitude for languages is a benefit for us.
>
>   --
> *From:* Ravi Chivukula 
> *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Sunday, September 2, 2012 9:30 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Why do people form cliques?
>
>
> Dear Em,
>
> I'm glad you noticed that, I myself hesitated using that word - but just
> went along with it anyway :-), you can consider it more as a writer's
> liberty or flourish. Wasn't trying to exclude anyone - FFL in itself is a
> coterie would be a better way to put it. The only cliques I have seen are
> formed by Barry, you weren't around when I first came here in May 2010,
> Barry thought I was someone who he could bully around, the arrogance and
> stupidity of that man..LOL..he and his clique took such a hard beating that
> he has never ever recovered from that :-)
>
>
> Yes - I have been blessed with an ability to learn languages, accents very
> quickly. I speak Hindi, Telugu and English - conversational at least with
> barely detectable accent, as in, in an accent which is well accepted in all
> these 3 languages. However lacking an arts degree and being stuck in a
> corporate world I don't have two many chances to display and improve my
> English vocabulary. However things changed since 2010 - FFL has greatly
> helped, not to mention all the various books I read when I was young. I
> spend a lot of time on Merriam Webster m-w.com, practicing
> pronunciation,words, subtle differences between each of the adjectives -
> pronunciation is an area which I'm a little weak in - more as in the
> American pronunciations for the words which I don't use on a day to day
> basis. My memory really helps, all my forefathers chanting Vedas by memory
> have done the dirty work for me, I repeat something a few times and I
> retain it - I think I have at least 1000 songs memorized.
>
> My English practice went up way high these past 7 months - practicing,
> articulating, vocalizing all my ideas. So there's an element of hard work
> as well driven by my love for adjectives in the English language and the
> need to express my ideas.
>
> So thank you.
>
> Love,
> Ravi
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Emily Reyn wrote:
>
> **
>
>  Don't even know that I'd agree with the "coterie" thingy, although I
> love your use of descriptive words.  You have a better command of the
> English language than many English speakers, no?  You are a smarty pants.
>  I'm just a "cool cat", ya dig?
>
>   --
> *From:* Ravi Chivukula 
> *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Sunday, September 2, 2012 3:07 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Why do people form cliques?
>
>
> Dear Barry Baby
>
> You opined* - " Immediately after after the minor clique-ist proposed his
> Enemies List, the clique leader responded, not only stroking the first
> clique-ist for dissing these eight people, but dissing them even further,
> suggesting that they lacked the spiritual, moral, emotional, and
> intellectual intelligence to...wait for it...see things the way she does.
>  "*
>
> Seriously you got all that Yahoo's message view - sometimes I
> underestimate your skills.
>
> Anyway it's not cliques - it's a coterie, a coterie of cogent, coherent,
> compelling mavericks.
>
> Love,
> Ravi
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:48 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> **
>
>  My day started with young Maya doing her Sunday morning routine, and
> asking me to show her "moovees" on my "competer." We chose a couple of
> episodes of a British kids' show "Charlie and Lola." It's pretty good,
> seemingly based on a series of very popular books written and
> illustrated by Lauren Child.
>
> I can see why they're popular. They are aimed at an audience aged 3 to
> 7, and they speak to this audience about real-life situations that a
> person of that age might encounter. Lola is an inquisitive girl, Charlie
> is her protective older brother, and their parents are never seen, so
> they have to figure out how to handle these situations *on their own*.
> This is what I consider the secret of the

Re: [FairfieldLife] Why do people form cliques?

[Ravi Chivukula]

Yes..I noticed that "two" as well and your "Maryam"LOL

P.S you can make fun of me - Ravi is a totally mockable,lovable character -
I myself laugh at my stupidities, eccentricities, habits and such.


On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Emily Reyn  wrote:

> **
>
>
> P.S.  Dear Ravi, I didn't realize you misspelled "two" until after I hit
> send.  Sorry, but this line struck me as sooo funny and now it's even
> funnier.  But, I am not making fun of you.  Love ya, Emily
>
>   --
> *From:* Emily Reyn 
> *To:* "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" 
> *Sent:* Sunday, September 2, 2012 9:49 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Why do people form cliques?
>
>
>  "However lacking an arts degree and being stuck in a corporate
> world I don't have two many chances to display and improve my English
> vocabulary."
>
> That is an uproariously, side-splittingly, humorous lineah ha ha ha.
>
> I have "bookmarked" Maryam - could use a little help myself.  Your
> aptitude for languages is a benefit for us.
>
>   --
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why do people form cliques?

[Ravi Chivukula]

Dear Ann - I saw your picture on FFL today, you are a tough, strong woman
and trust me "maverick's" lying there for you to claim, I'm not stopping
you..LOL..

Love,
Ravi

On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 8:04 PM, awoelflebater wrote:

> **
>
>
> Maverick, great word, I want to be a maverick, can I? Can I?
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn 
> wrote:
> >
> > Don't even know that I'd agree with the "coterie" thingy, although I
> love your use of descriptive words. Â You have a better command of the
> English language than many English speakers, no? Â You are a smarty pants.
> Â I'm just a "cool cat", ya dig? Â
> >
> >
> > 
> > From: Ravi Chivukula 
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Sunday, September 2, 2012 3:07 PM
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why do people form cliques?
> >
> >
> > Â
> > Dear Barry Baby
> >
> > You opined - " Immediately after after the minor clique-ist proposed
> his Enemies List, the clique leader responded, not only stroking the first
> clique-ist for dissing these eight people, but dissing them even further,
> suggesting that they lacked the spiritual, moral, emotional, and
> intellectual intelligence to...wait for it...see things the way she
> does. "
> >
> > Seriously you got all that Yahoo's message view - sometimes I
> underestimate your skills.
> >
> > Anyway it's not cliques - it's a coterie, a coterie of cogent, coherent,
> compelling mavericks.
> >
> > Love,
> > Ravi
> >
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

Dear Steve,

I was expecting you to wade in here but your response has left me totally
amused.

It's like a village bumpkin accosting a professor and telling the professor
he is an adversary to him - what is the professor supposed to? He will
probably just smile, change the topic and indulge in some silly talk with
the man - inquire about his well-being, his family, work, activities etc.

I'm too, faced with this conundrum every time you fantasize that you are
challenging me.

Trust me - I haven't met any adversary who has been able to match me since
Nov 2009. Not because I'm the strongest or the bravest or the smartest or
the most handsome or the most intelligent, no, because I haven't met anyone
who can match my brutal self-honesty and integrity. Almost always every one
is found immobile, stuck in some belief, some emotional investment or the
other whereas I'm forever mobile, free and soaring.

Coming to the rest of your message - your opinion places you squarely in
Barry's clique. If any other reasonable, intelligent person decides to join
your cause I will go ahead and address it.

Love,
Ravi



On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 7:51 PM, seventhray1 wrote:

> **
>
>
> I'll confess Ravi, that while you were gone, I asked myself, "do I miss
> his presence here"?  And I will also admit that the answer was "no, I did
> not"  It is true that we had become quite adversarial, and yes, there was a
> certain enjoyment it taking on that role.
>
> But once some time had passed, after you had been booted off, I realized
> how unpleasant it had really been.
>
> And here you are ramping up that same type behavior.  I guess you can't
> stay away from it.  I mean it looks like you are waging battles on several
> fronts.  In fact,  it seems  you've created web sites from which to wage
> some of these battles.
>
> At any rate, I find it distasteful, that you see fit to spew some much
> venom.
>
> Excuse me if I am not able to respond quickly to anything you might say.
>  We are spending part of the weekend here in Chicago, and I don't have
> ready access to a computer.  Sharing it with my wife and daughter.
>
>
>
> It is true that during your last stint, I had gotten deep into a battle
> posture with you.
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 3:04 PM, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@...
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > **
>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear Barry Baby,
> > > >
> > > > Well I hope your buddy just sticks to his writing on his way to
> > > > rehabilitating himself - I don't think there is any dispute on his
> > > writing
> > > > skills.
> > > >
> > > > I'm watching, I'm sure the old man and Judy are as well. I don't know
> > > about
> > > > them but the minute your buddy tries to wade into any kind of
> spiritual,
> > > > moral, ethical, intelligent voice here, I will methodically,
> ruthlessly,
> > > > mercilessly rip him apart assuming he will continue along on his
> > > clueless,
> > > > charade of his past trickery here. No sir - no Mayan Messiah of
> Morons,
> > > no
> > > > Maitreya of Morons getting a free pass from me.
> > > >
> > > > So remember that.
> > >
> > > That perfectly defines the troll agenda doesn't it?
> > >
> > >
> > Baby - I'm down with anything that helps your rehabilitation, I have a
> > special kind of love for you. Just don't, don't, you know what..:-).
> >
> > Anyway this is all from the Message view that I can't but help notice.
> Plus
> > I was talking to Barry. So, Bzzzt..back off, you are not in my list
> of
> > interesting persons. Not Interested. Take your whiny, drama queenery,
> > elsewhere - Get it?
> >
> > Love,
> > Ravi
> >
>
>  
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

I have correct the statement that no one has been able to defeat me - 3
have, 3 women, women that I fell in love with. One of them stands out in
its sheer enormity, the overwhelming way in which she won and transformed
me. But these adversaries remain confidential except for one (my ex) of
course.


On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Ravi Chivukula wrote:

> Dear Steve,
>
> I was expecting you to wade in here but your response has left me totally
> amused.
>
> It's like a village bumpkin accosting a professor and telling the
> professor he is an adversary to him - what is the professor supposed to? He
> will probably just smile, change the topic and indulge in some silly talk
> with the man - inquire about his well-being, his family, work, activities
> etc.
>
> I'm too, faced with this conundrum every time you fantasize that you are
> challenging me.
>
> Trust me - I haven't met any adversary who has been able to match me since
> Nov 2009. Not because I'm the strongest or the bravest or the smartest or
> the most handsome or the most intelligent, no, because I haven't met anyone
> who can match my brutal self-honesty and integrity. Almost always every one
> is found immobile, stuck in some belief, some emotional investment or the
> other whereas I'm forever mobile, free and soaring.
>
> Coming to the rest of your message - your opinion places you squarely in
> Barry's clique. If any other reasonable, intelligent person decides to join
> your cause I will go ahead and address it.
>
> Love,
> Ravi
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 7:51 PM, seventhray1 wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> I'll confess Ravi, that while you were gone, I asked myself, "do I miss
>> his presence here"?  And I will also admit that the answer was "no, I did
>> not"  It is true that we had become quite adversarial, and yes, there was a
>> certain enjoyment it taking on that role.
>>
>> But once some time had passed, after you had been booted off, I realized
>> how unpleasant it had really been.
>>
>> And here you are ramping up that same type behavior.  I guess you can't
>> stay away from it.  I mean it looks like you are waging battles on several
>> fronts.  In fact,  it seems  you've created web sites from which to wage
>> some of these battles.
>>
>> At any rate, I find it distasteful, that you see fit to spew some much
>> venom.
>>
>> Excuse me if I am not able to respond quickly to anything you might say.
>>  We are spending part of the weekend here in Chicago, and I don't have
>> ready access to a computer.  Sharing it with my wife and daughter.
>>
>>
>>
>> It is true that during your last stint, I had gotten deep into a battle
>> posture with you.
>>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 3:04 PM, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@...
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> > > **
>>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Dear Barry Baby,
>> > > >
>> > > > Well I hope your buddy just sticks to his writing on his way to
>> > > > rehabilitating himself - I don't think there is any dispute on his
>> > > writing
>> > > > skills.
>> > > >
>> > > > I'm watching, I'm sure the old man and Judy are as well. I don't
>> know
>> > > about
>> > > > them but the minute your buddy tries to wade into any kind of
>> spiritual,
>> > > > moral, ethical, intelligent voice here, I will methodically,
>> ruthlessly,
>> > > > mercilessly rip him apart assuming he will continue along on his
>> > > clueless,
>> > > > charade of his past trickery here. No sir - no Mayan Messiah of
>> Morons,
>> > > no
>> > > > Maitreya of Morons getting a free pass from me.
>> > > >
>> > > > So remember that.
>> > >
>> > > That perfectly defines the troll agenda doesn't it?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > Baby - I'm down with anything that helps your rehabilitation, I have a
>> > special kind of love for you. Just don't, don't, you know what..:-).
>> >
>> > Anyway this is all from the Message view that I can't but help notice.
>> Plus
>> > I was talking to Barry. So, Bzzzt..back off, you are not in my list
>> of
>> > interesting persons. Not Interested. Take your whiny, drama queenery,
>> > elsewhere - Get it?
>> >
>> > Love,
>> > Ravi
>> >
>>
>>  
>>
>
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

My ex taunted me at the courthouse as she walked away with everything, the
kids - the complete physical, legal custody with no visitation, even her
lawyer privately apologized to me though I was being playful and even
flirting with her, my ex said I was a loser and will always be a loser - I
had to agree for the first time, on that point and on that point alone -
that yes I was indeed a loser and will always be a loser, loser lover - but
wait - oh hello my fantasy beloved Rosathea.

Now watch out Steve - know I can whup your ass, any time, at my fancy, at
my will - except I don't have any satisfaction from you since you are so
dumb, and clueless that you don't even realize it and you deprive me of
this pleasure.


On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Ravi Chivukula wrote:

> I have correct the statement that no one has been able to defeat me - 3
> have, 3 women, women that I fell in love with. One of them stands out in
> its sheer enormity, the overwhelming way in which she won and transformed
> me. But these adversaries remain confidential except for one (my ex) of
> course.
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Steve,
>>
>> I was expecting you to wade in here but your response has left me totally
>> amused.
>>
>> It's like a village bumpkin accosting a professor and telling the
>> professor he is an adversary to him - what is the professor supposed to? He
>> will probably just smile, change the topic and indulge in some silly talk
>> with the man - inquire about his well-being, his family, work, activities
>> etc.
>>
>> I'm too, faced with this conundrum every time you fantasize that you are
>> challenging me.
>>
>> Trust me - I haven't met any adversary who has been able to match me
>> since Nov 2009. Not because I'm the strongest or the bravest or the
>> smartest or the most handsome or the most intelligent, no, because I
>> haven't met anyone who can match my brutal self-honesty and integrity.
>> Almost always every one is found immobile, stuck in some belief, some
>> emotional investment or the other whereas I'm forever mobile, free and
>> soaring.
>>
>> Coming to the rest of your message - your opinion places you squarely in
>> Barry's clique. If any other reasonable, intelligent person decides to join
>> your cause I will go ahead and address it.
>>
>> Love,
>> Ravi
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 7:51 PM, seventhray1 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> **
>>>
>>>
>>> I'll confess Ravi, that while you were gone, I asked myself, "do I miss
>>> his presence here"?  And I will also admit that the answer was "no, I did
>>> not"  It is true that we had become quite adversarial, and yes, there was a
>>> certain enjoyment it taking on that role.
>>>
>>> But once some time had passed, after you had been booted off, I realized
>>> how unpleasant it had really been.
>>>
>>> And here you are ramping up that same type behavior.  I guess you can't
>>> stay away from it.  I mean it looks like you are waging battles on several
>>> fronts.  In fact,  it seems  you've created web sites from which to wage
>>> some of these battles.
>>>
>>> At any rate, I find it distasteful, that you see fit to spew some much
>>> venom.
>>>
>>> Excuse me if I am not able to respond quickly to anything you might say.
>>>  We are spending part of the weekend here in Chicago, and I don't have
>>> ready access to a computer.  Sharing it with my wife and daughter.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It is true that during your last stint, I had gotten deep into a battle
>>> posture with you.
>>>
>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 3:04 PM, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@...
>>> > > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > **
>>>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Dear Barry Baby,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Well I hope your buddy just sticks to his writing on his way to
>>> > > > rehabilitating himself - I don't think there is any dispute on his
>>> > > writing
>>> > > > skills.
>>> > > >
>>> > 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 2:25 AM, salyavin808 wrote:

> **
>
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
> >
> > My ex taunted me at the courthouse as she walked away with everything,
> the
> > kids - the complete physical, legal custody with no visitation, even her
> > lawyer privately apologized to me though I was being playful and even
> > flirting with her, my ex said I was a loser and will always be a loser -
> I
> > had to agree for the first time, on that point and on that point alone -
> > that yes I was indeed a loser and will always be a loser, loser lover -
> but
> > wait - oh hello my fantasy beloved Rosathea.
> >
> > Now watch out Steve - know I can whup your ass, any time, at my fancy, at
> > my will - except I don't have any satisfaction from you since you are so
> > dumb, and clueless that you don't even realize it and you deprive me of
> > this pleasure.
>
> You've got dribble on your chin again.
>
>
Dear drooling, salivating, chinless beauty,

This is not the first time I have attracted the attention of someone
feeling the pangs of chin-envy..LOL..

Are you feeling pretty un-petted these days? Look I have to blame you here,
you got sucked in by Barry and I understand how hard it is to get petted by
a paranoid, delusional, narcissistic person, It took me 13 years if that's
any comfort, but unlike you I had other compensating factors - not to
mention how beautiful this person was. Anyway I don't think I'm a really
good looking fellow but for some reason I have always managed to attract
beautiful women and yes your chin-envy gives it away - my chin, jaw seems
to play an important factor.

Now just go and run around baby.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

Oh my sweet, kind, gentle Auntie - it's all good, it's an old, old story
now - I just get carried away in my stories :-).

Like I said I was being playful with her lawyer - Kelly, she was a bit
older than me but good looking - drove my ex mad..LOL..she was like, don't
talk to my attorney - not realizing the stupidity and hilarity of her
statement. Anyway her lawyer starts explaining how she is a nice, honest
person, goes to bed every night peacefully (as in I'm just doing my job)
and I'm like whatever and then she looks me in the eye and says - look
Ravi, you are a really nice guy, I am still being playful and she repeats
with emphasis - No, Ravi listen - you are a very nice guy and then I
finally acknowledged and gave her one of my patented bows.


On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Share Long  wrote:

> **
>
>
> dear Ravi,
> I'm so sorry you had to go through all this with ex.  Must be awful to be
> separated from your children.  Wish I knew the exactly right words to say
> to soothe your heart.  And Rosathea as wonderful as she might be, probably
> not much help in this situation.
> Anyway fwiw, I'm doing my best to practice compassion, what the Buddhists
> call lovingkindness.  Not always easy to do.  Figure if someone is hurtful
> or snide or whatever, probably because they're hurting inside.  Even if
> it's not obvious.  Ann had a good insight about this.
> I do love how much of the time you take yourself lightly.  Makes me smile
> a lot.
> big hug from Auntie
> Share
>
>   --
> *From:* Ravi Chivukula 
> *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Monday, September 3, 2012 1:38 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret
>
>
> My ex taunted me at the courthouse as she walked away with everything, the
> kids - the complete physical, legal custody with no visitation, even her
> lawyer privately apologized to me though I was being playful and even
> flirting with her, my ex said I was a loser and will always be a loser - I
> had to agree for the first time, on that point and on that point alone -
> that yes I was indeed a loser and will always be a loser, loser lover - but
> wait - oh hello my fantasy beloved Rosathea.
>
> Now watch out Steve - know I can whup your ass, any time, at my fancy, at
> my will - except I don't have any satisfaction from you since you are so
> dumb, and clueless that you don't even realize it and you deprive me of
> this pleasure.
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
>
> I have correct the statement that no one has been able to defeat me - 3
> have, 3 women, women that I fell in love with. One of them stands out in
> its sheer enormity, the overwhelming way in which she won and transformed
> me. But these adversaries remain confidential except for one (my ex) of
> course.
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
>
> Dear Steve,
>
> I was expecting you to wade in here but your response has left me totally
> amused.
>
> It's like a village bumpkin accosting a professor and telling the
> professor he is an adversary to him - what is the professor supposed to? He
> will probably just smile, change the topic and indulge in some silly talk
> with the man - inquire about his well-being, his family, work, activities
> etc.
>
> I'm too, faced with this conundrum every time you fantasize that you are
> challenging me.
>
> Trust me - I haven't met any adversary who has been able to match me since
> Nov 2009. Not because I'm the strongest or the bravest or the smartest or
> the most handsome or the most intelligent, no, because I haven't met anyone
> who can match my brutal self-honesty and integrity. Almost always every one
> is found immobile, stuck in some belief, some emotional investment or the
> other whereas I'm forever mobile, free and soaring.
>
> Coming to the rest of your message - your opinion places you squarely in
> Barry's clique. If any other reasonable, intelligent person decides to join
> your cause I will go ahead and address it.
>
> Love,
> Ravi
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 7:51 PM, seventhray1 wrote:
>
> **
>
>   I'll confess Ravi, that while you were gone, I asked myself, "do I miss
> his presence here"?  And I will also admit that the answer was "no, I did
> not"  It is true that we had become quite adversarial, and yes, there was a
> certain enjoyment it taking on that role.
>
> But once some time had passed, after you had been booted off, I realized
> how unpleasant it had really been.
>
> And here you are ramping up that same type behavior.  I guess you can't
> stay away f

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

(Shrugs..smiles)..Enjoy your vacation Steve, regards to your family and
remember for you and you alone I will be rooting for Rams in addition to
49'ers.


On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:04 AM, seventhray1 wrote:

> **
>
>
> Hey Rav.
>
> Thanks for your reply.  Maybe one day you will be recognized for the great
> sage and guru that you are.  I know that you made a concerted effort to be
> recognized as "Ravi Guru",  the next Western Yogi some years back, and I
> know that that attempt fell flat. But, you know Ronald Reagan had to try
> several times before he won the presidency, so I would suggest that you not
> give up the fight.
>
> And yes, I hope that the personal sacrifices you have had to make have
> been worth it, i.e. losing family etc,  But many times great men have had
> to endure such sacrifices, and also difficult circumstances growing up, so
> maybe all these ingredients will come together and allow you to be
> recognized for your greatness.
>
> And we here, can say, that we were at the ground level of this emergence.
>
> Love ya like a brother,
>
> Steve
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Steve,
> >
> > I was expecting you to wade in here but your response has left me totally
> > amused.
> >
> > It's like a village bumpkin accosting a professor and telling the
> professor
> > he is an adversary to him - what is the professor supposed to? He will
> > probably just smile, change the topic and indulge in some silly talk with
> > the man - inquire about his well-being, his family, work, activities etc.
> >
> > I'm too, faced with this conundrum every time you fantasize that you are
> > challenging me.
> >
> > Trust me - I haven't met any adversary who has been able to match me
> since
> > Nov 2009. Not because I'm the strongest or the bravest or the smartest or
> > the most handsome or the most intelligent, no, because I haven't met
> anyone
> > who can match my brutal self-honesty and integrity. Almost always every
> one
> > is found immobile, stuck in some belief, some emotional investment or the
> > other whereas I'm forever mobile, free and soaring.
> >
> > Coming to the rest of your message - your opinion places you squarely in
> > Barry's clique. If any other reasonable, intelligent person decides to
> join
> > your cause I will go ahead and address it.
> >
> > Love,
> > Ravi
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 7:51 PM, seventhray1 steve.sundur@...wrote:
> >
> > > **
>
> > >
> > >
> > > I'll confess Ravi, that while you were gone, I asked myself, "do I miss
> > > his presence here"? And I will also admit that the answer was "no, I
> did
> > > not" It is true that we had become quite adversarial, and yes, there
> was a
> > > certain enjoyment it taking on that role.
> > >
> > > But once some time had passed, after you had been booted off, I
> realized
> > > how unpleasant it had really been.
> > >
> > > And here you are ramping up that same type behavior. I guess you can't
> > > stay away from it. I mean it looks like you are waging battles on
> several
> > > fronts. In fact, it seems you've created web sites from which to wage
> > > some of these battles.
> > >
> > > At any rate, I find it distasteful, that you see fit to spew some much
> > > venom.
> > >
> > > Excuse me if I am not able to respond quickly to anything you might
> say.
> > > We are spending part of the weekend here in Chicago, and I don't have
> > > ready access to a computer. Sharing it with my wife and daughter.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > It is true that during your last stint, I had gotten deep into a battle
> > > posture with you.
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 3:04 PM, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@
> > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > **
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula
> chivukula.ravi@
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dear Barry Baby,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Well I hope your buddy just sticks to his writin

Re: [FairfieldLife] Proof not all Indians are geniuses

[Ravi Chivukula]

Who told you all Indians are geniuses Uncle Barry 2 ji? Let your love for
me not cloud your vision :-)

A majority of them (1st gen immigrants) are a bunch of conservative,
misogynist, homophobic bastards - I only tolerate them if they have other
overwhelmingly good qualities.

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Bhairitu  wrote:

> **
>
>
> Bill Maher ripping tea party moron Dinesh D'Souza:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwOy4F53rSg
>
>  
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:54 AM, nablusoss1008 wrote:

> **
>
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > Who would wish
> that on anybody?
>
> Ravi was right ofcourse, it didn't take long before the hillbilly-singer
> was back where he left us last time and where he's feeling most
> comfortable: Maharishi-bashing.
> If all else fails in life it's great to have someone to bash,
> particularily someone who's dead, don't you think ?
>
>  _
>

No worries Nabby, he doesn't have any moral, ethical, spiritual,
intelligent voice until he stops being Maitreya of Morons. He though
Maharishi was his ticket to celebrity and an endless supply of hot, younger
chicks...LOL..no wonder the bastard's still bitter :-)

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

It's not the fact that he is just dead.

You yourself have no honesty and integrity to question him - that man is at
least dead, you are alive.

Just wake up and take care of yourself, rather than your fixation on him.
What moral, ethical, spiritual principles you have - you can continue your
fixations, fantasies on Maharishi but don't expect you not being called on
it every time you do that.

Prove us you are not Maitreya of Morons here, you are rehabilitating, good
we all applaud it. The Morons who parade their emotionally demented,
deranged, depraved misogynist, homophobic nonsense here day in and day out,
abusing and taunting others from posting here, their 17 year old paranoid,
delusional, narcissistic fantasies. You yourself had the the temerity to
brand Judy as being full of malice, of trying to slander you, man the gall,
arrogance and the stupidity.

I feel pity for your ass.


On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:26 PM, curtisdeltablues <
curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> **
>
>
> Thanks for verifying the triplets MMY story Nabbie, I was just guessing.
> What course was that on?
>
> I am curious about this arbitrary fixation on his deadness. I thought you
> guys believed that he is still with us somewhere between Marley's ghost and
> the thought in meditation that inspires the marketing crew to try some new
> scheme to get TM into the lives beyond the 687 people who still practice it
> exclusively now.
>
> So you think a guy like Maharishi actually dies? And how do you imagine my
> "bashing" affects him? Is it like a disturbance in sleep like when someone
> in the bed farts and we almost wake up and then turn over? Or does it
> really get to him, do my words cause him to gnash his teeth and pound his
> fist into his hands in a Sienfeldesque "CURTIS!" Does he shake his fist at
> the sky like Jon Stewart and curse me from beyond the grave? Does he try to
> extract retribution on me in this world to get me back in some way like
> moving a chair when I sleep so I stub my toe during a mid-sleep groggy
> bathroom run? Exactly how pissed do my words make this spirit of Maharishi
> you imagine? Should I invest in a voodoo doll of him to avoid his evil eye?
>
> Now of course if your point was that when I posted the same perspective
> when he was alive he had a chance to challenge what I said directly, I
> would agree. I think we are both glad that he took so many opportunities to
> give his side here while he was living, and I do miss those exchanges.
>
> And how far does this ban about speaking ill of the dead extend Nabbie. Do
> we include Napoleon, Sun Myng Moon, John Lennon? What is the key aspect of
> the unfairness you seem to resent about it all?
>
> What if we have a public figure who is so boring that he might as well be
> dead like King Tony? Do I have to include him in the don't speak about the
> dead ban. Should we just ban all histories of famous dead people if the
> perspective isn't only positive?
>
> Or was this whole thing just a protective instinct, misguided though I
> believe it to be, to protect the magical illusions he tried to sell us all
> about himself during his life?
>
> Oh shit I have a fleck of dust in my eye...hey wait a minute...wasn't he a
> pile of dust the last time we saw him...
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008  wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > Who would
> wish that on anybody?
> >
> >
> > Ravi was right ofcourse, it didn't take long before the hillbilly-singer
> was back where he left us last time and where he's feeling most
> comfortable: Maharishi-bashing.
> > If all else fails in life it's great to have someone to bash,
> particularily someone who's dead, don't you think ?
> >
>
>  
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

Dear Curtis,

And you will always be morally, spiritually , ethically bankrupt as long as
you support Barry's antics. Your progressive values are always suspect.

Your stories of young African American kids may warm the hearts of naive,
innocent liberals but it doesn't fool me.

It's just white man's guilt, white man's burden nicely wrapped as a set of
beliefs for you to play wolf on others like Ravi Chivukula.

Ravi, who worked in housing projects, smiled, loved even at the age of 23,
not even bothered if he was addressed as a b**ch, motherf**ker, because he
understood the love. I loved their heart, their music - rap, gospel music,
I had experience through a whole cross section of African Americans from
crude, innocent, to educated, sophisticated - Dr. Thompson and the
secretary Mary - I was touched by their love, they treated me like their
own child, their eyes would lit up as I would walk in  - it was like being
back in India. My love for African-Americans, women and gays is unmatched -
not a convenient set of nicely wrapped beliefs to play wolf on others.

So I pity your ass, but any time you try to wade into any kind of moral,
spiritual, ethical voice here - I warn you - I will whup your ass and
parade your dishonesty here for everyone to see.

So please do me a favor - just stick to your writing - it's beautiful.

Love,
Ravi





On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Ravi Chivukula wrote:

> It's not the fact that he is just dead.
>
> You yourself have no honesty and integrity to question him - that man is
> at least dead, you are alive.
>
> Just wake up and take care of yourself, rather than your fixation on him.
> What moral, ethical, spiritual principles you have - you can continue your
> fixations, fantasies on Maharishi but don't expect you not being called on
> it every time you do that.
>
> Prove us you are not Maitreya of Morons here, you are rehabilitating, good
> we all applaud it. The Morons who parade their emotionally demented,
> deranged, depraved misogynist, homophobic nonsense here day in and day out,
> abusing and taunting others from posting here, their 17 year old paranoid,
> delusional, narcissistic fantasies. You yourself had the the temerity to
> brand Judy as being full of malice, of trying to slander you, man the gall,
> arrogance and the stupidity.
>
> I feel pity for your ass.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:26 PM, curtisdeltablues <
> curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> Thanks for verifying the triplets MMY story Nabbie, I was just guessing.
>> What course was that on?
>>
>> I am curious about this arbitrary fixation on his deadness. I thought you
>> guys believed that he is still with us somewhere between Marley's ghost and
>> the thought in meditation that inspires the marketing crew to try some new
>> scheme to get TM into the lives beyond the 687 people who still practice it
>> exclusively now.
>>
>> So you think a guy like Maharishi actually dies? And how do you imagine
>> my "bashing" affects him? Is it like a disturbance in sleep like when
>> someone in the bed farts and we almost wake up and then turn over? Or does
>> it really get to him, do my words cause him to gnash his teeth and pound
>> his fist into his hands in a Sienfeldesque "CURTIS!" Does he shake his fist
>> at the sky like Jon Stewart and curse me from beyond the grave? Does he try
>> to extract retribution on me in this world to get me back in some way like
>> moving a chair when I sleep so I stub my toe during a mid-sleep groggy
>> bathroom run? Exactly how pissed do my words make this spirit of Maharishi
>> you imagine? Should I invest in a voodoo doll of him to avoid his evil eye?
>>
>> Now of course if your point was that when I posted the same perspective
>> when he was alive he had a chance to challenge what I said directly, I
>> would agree. I think we are both glad that he took so many opportunities to
>> give his side here while he was living, and I do miss those exchanges.
>>
>> And how far does this ban about speaking ill of the dead extend Nabbie.
>> Do we include Napoleon, Sun Myng Moon, John Lennon? What is the key aspect
>> of the unfairness you seem to resent about it all?
>>
>> What if we have a public figure who is so boring that he might as well be
>> dead like King Tony? Do I have to include him in the don't speak about the
>> dead ban. Should we just ban all histories of famous dead people if the
>> perspective isn't only positive?
>>
>> Or was this whole thing just a protective instinct, misguided though I
>> believe it to be, to protect the magical illusions he tried to sell us all
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

Dear Curtis,

You are a sick, sly, SOB - proving you don't even have any semblance of
self-dignity, a masochist..LOL..as Judy once said beautifully put..FOAD, I
have bigger fish to fry.

Love,
Ravi


On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 1:09 PM, curtisdeltablues  wrote:

> **
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
> >
> > It's not the fact that he is just dead.
>
> Did Nabbie just change his handle here?
>
> >
> > You yourself have no honesty and integrity to question him - that man is
> at> least dead, you are alive.>
>
> So you were hoping to argue with me about my opinions about a man you
> didn't know did ya? And you were thinking it might be inappropriate for me
> to voice opinions about him on a board devoted to those issues.
>
> Got it, I'm sure that all makes perfect sense in crazy world.
>
>
> >
> > Just wake up and take care of yourself, rather than your fixation on him.
> > What moral, ethical, spiritual principles you have - you can continue
> your
> > fixations, fantasies on Maharishi but don't expect you not being called
> on
> > it every time you do that.
>
> Yeah, well this is a TM and ex TM focused forum so you are gunna get some
> talk about the guy I would think. And I wasn't challenged on anything I
> said, it was just a general insult post like yours. I would welcome someone
> to challenge the meaning of what I wrote.
>
>
> >
> > Prove us you are not Maitreya of Morons here, you are rehabilitating,
> good
> > we all applaud it. The Morons who parade their emotionally demented,
> > deranged, depraved misogynist, homophobic nonsense here day in and day
> out,
> > abusing and taunting others from posting here, their 17 year old
> paranoid,
> > delusional, narcissistic fantasies.
>
> Yeah, the judge got that one right.
>
>
> You yourself had the the temerity to
> > brand Judy as being full of malice, of trying to slander you, man the
> gall,
> > arrogance and the stupidity.
>
> I get it that this site is a soap opera vehicle for your own personal
> frustrations, but Judy has nothing to do with this exchange. If you are
> trying to insert yourself into long forgotten exchanges I had with her in
> the past you are being trollish, trying to get two other people to fight
> who have no current beef with each other.
>
> Now I see that with no TM background all you have to do here is shoot
> spitballs and hope they will get you noticed, but you aren't gunna get much
> traction on the train of "don't talk about Maharishi here".
>
>
> >
> > I feel pity for your ass.>
>
> No you don't. You feel resentment for your own personal life and you are
> trying to take that aggression out on strangers here, inserting yourself
> into conversations between people with actual skin in the game. I may
> disagree with Nabbie but he knew Maharishi and has earned his opinion about
> him as I have. You are just a troll looking for a fight about topics you
> know nothing about while hoping that by interjecting yourself into the
> personalities of the posters here you wont stick out so much.
>
> You are a tumbleweed of unfocused unpleasantness blowing through this
> group till you completely lose it and get booted off.
>
> Again.
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:26 PM, curtisdeltablues <
> > curtisdeltablues@...> wrote:
> >
> > > **
>
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for verifying the triplets MMY story Nabbie, I was just
> guessing.
> > > What course was that on?
> > >
> > > I am curious about this arbitrary fixation on his deadness. I thought
> you
> > > guys believed that he is still with us somewhere between Marley's
> ghost and
> > > the thought in meditation that inspires the marketing crew to try some
> new
> > > scheme to get TM into the lives beyond the 687 people who still
> practice it
> > > exclusively now.
> > >
> > > So you think a guy like Maharishi actually dies? And how do you
> imagine my
> > > "bashing" affects him? Is it like a disturbance in sleep like when
> someone
> > > in the bed farts and we almost wake up and then turn over? Or does it
> > > really get to him, do my words cause him to gnash his teeth and pound
> his
> > > fist into his hands in a Sienfeldesque "CURTIS!" Does he shake his
> fist at
> > > the sky like Jon Stewart and curse me from beyond the grave? Does he
> try to
> > > extract retribution on me in this world to get me back in some way like
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Proof not all Indians are geniuses

[Ravi Chivukula]

Well Uncle-ji,

I love immigrants but I'm at my heart a progressive, liberal and my main
gripe would be with anyone with an attitude that doesn't fit my core
values. It's just that most of the first generation Indian immigrants lack
these values - the new youngsters from India - in their young 20's may be
different. I had a chance to talk to a couple of young Indian girls, second
generation immigrants - I enthralled, enticed and entertained them and I
think from the second generation on they are mainstreamed into the American
way.

Of course I have other complaints that may see me on the side of
conservatives :-), such as the lack of effort on the part of immigrants to
integrate, mainstream themselves. The amount of effort I have spent in this
regard is admirable and sometimes I find myself nodding myself with
conservatives - but their primary motivation mostly is based on fear,
anxiety and my motivation is love for America.

Love,
Ravi



On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Bhairitu  wrote:

> **
>
>
> On 09/03/2012 11:55 AM, Ravi Chivukula wrote:
> > Who told you all Indians are geniuses Uncle Barry 2 ji?
>
> Probably the guys who look like they should be shoe salesmen that wind
> up running tech companies. You know, the ones that think a San
> Francisco address will make their company more prestigious. The ones
> that want to hire fresh out of college kids to do the equivalent of tech
> digging ditches for basement sale prices. The ones that won't hire old
> farts like me because we are "too high level" whatever that means.
>
> I did a rant last week about an interview with a 20 something. I
> finally called the agency on Thursday to find out what that company
> thought. They said I was too "high level" so I had to ask what that
> meant. To my surprise the agency gal knew quite a bit about the
> industry and could even talk shop. She told me she was even ambivalent
> about trying to place me there because they had rejected other
> experienced developers. Actually I wasn't too anxious about doing a
> 40-50 mile commute each day even for only two months.
>
>
> >
> > A majority of them (1st gen immigrants) are a bunch of conservative,
> > misogynist, homophobic bastards - I only tolerate them if they have other
> > overwhelmingly good qualities.
>
> Reminds me, I grew up in a farm community where Mexican laborers would
> come in an harvest summer crops like asparagus. The farmer might pick
> one to be a year round foreman and I wound up going to school with their
> kids. Some twenty years later I was back home and listening to those
> families complain about the new Mexican immigrants moving in. Kinda
> funny. Of course in California there are a lot of families who have
> Mexican ancestry going back to before California was part of the US and
> they often don't like Mexican immigrants.
>
> I also learned years ago working in a salsa band how much South
> Americans dislike Mexicans. Also very funny.
>
>
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Bhairitu 
> wrote:
> >
> >> **
>
> >>
> >>
> >> Bill Maher ripping tea party moron Dinesh D'Souza:
> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwOy4F53rSg
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>  
>

[FairfieldLife] Need a progressive, activist attorney

[Ravi Chivukula]

http://tmblr.co/ZjaHJwSj8HHr 

Thank you.

Love,
Ravi

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

All the while perpetuating this clique, this white, mid-western, ole boy
network.

No matter how many times Barry and Curtis get humiliated by me, they are
needy, clueless, shameless -- they will always manage to deceive, con,
attract some innocent naive, gullible liberals, with their deceptive
writing, the Xenos, the Susans, the Steves.

But they will not fool the cogent, coherent, compelling Mavericks of this
list, The Judy Stein's, The Robin Carlsen's, The Bob Price's of this list.

I feel contempt and disgust for these two MF'ers - Curtis and Barry.

I have no need to hide behind any political correctness, any white man's
guilt, burden to call it as I see it and I spare none. My forefathers were
equal opportunity racists, however a true Brahmin first works on his own
biases, fears, insecurities, anxieties before going after others - he
doesn't even spare his own family and I haven't  - other than my sisters
but such is the conditioning, love of an Indian brother.

What's the most that one can do - kill me? I'll mock and laugh at my own
body's frailty, fragility, even as I watch it wringing, writhing, agonizing
in pain. And then the world will celebrate the glory of the only Brahmin of
this world - Ravi Chivukula - his brutal-self honesty and integrity, his
commitment to truth, his fearlessness that even death couldn't touch him.

That's the Hindu metaphor of a Brahmin - nothing you can earn by birth,
it's only accidental that I have been one. The kshatriyas(warriors, kings,
administrators) of the past wouldn't touch such a Brahmin - because they
knew he had conquered death, they would seek their advice, because they
knew he would call it without any bias. Indians talk about a story of how
Alexander the Great met such a Brahmin - it could just be a myth for all we
know.

Such a Brahmin can only be defeated by a woman - he has to be, it has to be
so, so he learns to be ever humble, to be ever watchful, change, modify,
finetune his behavior, his actions, his biases, his motivations - knowing
that the existence - the dynamic, organic, mysterious entity can whup his
ass anytime, at its own will, at its own fancy.

Yours arrogantly, humbly, hatingly, lovingly,
Ravi Chivukula.



On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Ravi Chivukula wrote:

> Dear Curtis,
>
> And you will always be morally, spiritually , ethically bankrupt as long
> as you support Barry's antics. Your progressive values are always suspect.
>
> Your stories of young African American kids may warm the hearts of naive,
> innocent liberals but it doesn't fool me.
>
> It's just white man's guilt, white man's burden nicely wrapped as a set of
> beliefs for you to play wolf on others like Ravi Chivukula.
>
> Ravi, who worked in housing projects, smiled, loved even at the age of 23,
> not even bothered if he was addressed as a b**ch, motherf**ker, because he
> understood the love. I loved their heart, their music - rap, gospel music,
> I had experience through a whole cross section of African Americans from
> crude, innocent, to educated, sophisticated - Dr. Thompson and the
> secretary Mary - I was touched by their love, they treated me like their
> own child, their eyes would lit up as I would walk in  - it was like being
> back in India. My love for African-Americans, women and gays is unmatched -
> not a convenient set of nicely wrapped beliefs to play wolf on others.
>
> So I pity your ass, but any time you try to wade into any kind of moral,
> spiritual, ethical voice here - I warn you - I will whup your ass and
> parade your dishonesty here for everyone to see.
>
> So please do me a favor - just stick to your writing - it's beautiful.
>
> Love,
> Ravi
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
>
>> It's not the fact that he is just dead.
>>
>> You yourself have no honesty and integrity to question him - that man is
>> at least dead, you are alive.
>>
>> Just wake up and take care of yourself, rather than your fixation on him.
>> What moral, ethical, spiritual principles you have - you can continue your
>> fixations, fantasies on Maharishi but don't expect you not being called on
>> it every time you do that.
>>
>> Prove us you are not Maitreya of Morons here, you are rehabilitating,
>> good we all applaud it. The Morons who parade their emotionally demented,
>> deranged, depraved misogynist, homophobic nonsense here day in and day out,
>> abusing and taunting others from posting here, their 17 year old paranoid,
>> delusional, narcissistic fantasies. You yourself had the the temerity to
>> brand Judy as being full of malice, of trying to slander you, man the gall,
>> arrogance and the stupidity.
>>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:17 PM, curtisdeltablues  wrote:

> **
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Yours arrogantly, humbly, hatingly, lovingly,
> > Ravi Chivukula.
>
> Well at least you nailed the "arrogantly and hatingly" part. I wonder who
> it was who used to crow so much about being a "maverick" like you are...
> similar distorted sense of grandiose self-importance too...just can't
> remember the name...
>

Dear Curtis,

I'm glad you latched on the "arrogantly hating" part - it was indeed for
you and Barry to claim, you two - who are the apt metaphors for the Hindu
demons - the demons symbolizing ignorance, deception among other things.

I know I can never stop your deception - you will always your captive
audience.

My message was for the others on this list and the lurkers reading this -
there are lots and lots of cogent, coherent, compelling Maverick free
passes (not Dallas Mavericks, mind you) -  lying around, hidden from your
sight of course..LOL.. - it's their choice to pick it up or not.

I don't think there's any doubt about the nature of my brazen, outrageous,
overt grandiosity and narcissism - that's the strength of my belief in my
self-honesty and integrity.


Love,
Ravi



> >
> > All the while perpetuating this clique, this white, mid-western, ole boy
> > network.
> >
> > No matter how many times Barry and Curtis get humiliated by me, they are
> > needy, clueless, shameless -- they will always manage to deceive, con,
> > attract some innocent naive, gullible liberals, with their deceptive
> > writing, the Xenos, the Susans, the Steves.
> >
> > But they will not fool the cogent, coherent, compelling Mavericks of this
> > list, The Judy Stein's, The Robin Carlsen's, The Bob Price's of this
> list.
> >
> > I feel contempt and disgust for these two MF'ers - Curtis and Barry.
> >
> > I have no need to hide behind any political correctness, any white man's
> > guilt, burden to call it as I see it and I spare none. My forefathers
> were
> > equal opportunity racists, however a true Brahmin first works on his own
> > biases, fears, insecurities, anxieties before going after others - he
> > doesn't even spare his own family and I haven't - other than my sisters
> > but such is the conditioning, love of an Indian brother.
> >
> > What's the most that one can do - kill me? I'll mock and laugh at my own
> > body's frailty, fragility, even as I watch it wringing, writhing,
> agonizing
> > in pain. And then the world will celebrate the glory of the only Brahmin
> of
> > this world - Ravi Chivukula - his brutal-self honesty and integrity, his
> > commitment to truth, his fearlessness that even death couldn't touch him.
> >
> > That's the Hindu metaphor of a Brahmin - nothing you can earn by birth,
> > it's only accidental that I have been one. The kshatriyas(warriors,
> kings,
> > administrators) of the past wouldn't touch such a Brahmin - because they
> > knew he had conquered death, they would seek their advice, because they
> > knew he would call it without any bias. Indians talk about a story of how
> > Alexander the Great met such a Brahmin - it could just be a myth for all
> we
> > know.
> >
> > Such a Brahmin can only be defeated by a woman - he has to be, it has to
> be
> > so, so he learns to be ever humble, to be ever watchful, change, modify,
> > finetune his behavior, his actions, his biases, his motivations - knowing
> > that the existence - the dynamic, organic, mysterious entity can whup his
> > ass anytime, at its own will, at its own fancy.
> >
> > Yours arrogantly, humbly, hatingly, lovingly,
> > Ravi Chivukula.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Ravi Chivukula  ...>wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Curtis,
> > >
> > > And you will always be morally, spiritually , ethically bankrupt as
> long
> > > as you support Barry's antics. Your progressive values are always
> suspect.
> > >
> > > Your stories of young African American kids may warm the hearts of
> naive,
> > > innocent liberals but it doesn't fool me.
> > >
> > > It's just white man's guilt, white man's burden nicely wrapped as a
> set of
> > > beliefs for you to play wolf on others like Ravi Chivukula.
> > >
> > > Ravi, who worked in housing projects, smiled, loved even at the age of
> 23,
> > > not even bothered if he was addressed as a b*

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:31 PM, seventhray1 wrote:

> **
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
> snip> Coming to the rest of your message - your opinion places you
> squarely in
> > Barry's clique. If any other reasonable, intelligent person decides to
> join
>
> > your cause I will go ahead and address it.
>
> Hey Ravi,
>
> Driving h0me today from Chicago, it ocurred to me to ask if this comes
> with a Certificate of Authenticity, signed by you, of course?  Also, do you
> know what rights and priviledges I might be entitled to by being a member
> of this clique?  And finally, is this a probationary period, or am I
> straight away a full fledged member?
>
> If possible I'd like an answer to these questions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Your Friend Steve
>
>  
>

Your choice dear Steve, to remain in this clique or to be a cogent,
coherent, compelling Maverick - refer to my earlier message about these
free passes that can be claimed by anyone. I have told you many times - I
will never forget your phone call in May 2010 and regardless of anything
you do, you will always have my love.

Love,
Ravi

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Sep 3, 2012, at 6:46 PM, "curtisdeltablues"  
wrote:

> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1"  wrote:
> > 
> > This is not a fair fight Curtis. Cut him some slack.
> > 
> 
> That was my mistake last time Steve. I believed that. 
> 
> I appreciate your balancing comments and genuine affection for the guy 
> though. I've got a harder climb on that score. My sights are just focused on 
> containment of damage this time around. 
> 

"Containment of damage"..LOL, a rare peek into your honesty, rather than your 
usual dishonesty and deception - love it 'bro.

This is exactly what you did last time as well, your dishonesty, tricks, 
sleight of hands twisting it are very amusing.

I'm enjoying my stroll on Torrey Pines and your hard breathing is irritating 
me, I for a moment thought it was the rumbling of the ocean or the rumbling of 
the Amtrak Coaster, so just chillax.

P.S. Accusing me of being Bush and Palin is not cutting it 'bro - everyone here 
knows my contempt and hostility for all conservatives - Indian or American, as 
they are dismissed with my polite, playful trickery.



> 
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hard to really see the purpose in telling strangers on the internet to
> > Fuck off and Die. That is kind of dark, even for me.
> > >
> > > But it does remind me that you are an ill-wisher and although the
> > depth of your malice caught me off guard last time, I am much better
> > prepared for you now.
> > >
> > > I have to disagree with your grandiose claim to some imaginary "bigger
> > fish to fry". In this discussion you were able to make a nasty insult to
> > a stranger on a forum for people in a group you have no connection with.
> > Making unpleasant statements like that IS your purpose for being here.
> > It is pretty much all you have contributed here since you got back.
> > >
> > > Self-aggrandizing personal attacks on people you don't know, loaded
> > with the personal charge of your own life's disappointments. There
> > really should be a name for this Internet forum phenomenon, perhaps
> > using figurative language that implies that one lives under a bridge in
> > darkness, only to pop out with an incoherent attack when someone comes
> > across
> > >
> > > I'll give it some thought I'm sure I can come up with something.
> > 
> > 
> > This is not a fair fight Curtis. Cut him some slack.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear Curtis,
> > > >
> > > > You are a sick, sly, SOB - proving you don't even have any semblance
> > of
> > > > self-dignity, a masochist..LOL..as Judy once said beautifully
> > put..FOAD, I
> > > > have bigger fish to fry.
> > > >
> > > > Love,
> > > > Ravi
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 1:09 PM, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@
> > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > **
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula
> > 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's not the fact that he is just dead.
> > > > >
> > > > > Did Nabbie just change his handle here?
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You yourself have no honesty and integrity to question him -
> > that man is
> > > > > at> least dead, you are alive.>
> > > > >
> > > > > So you were hoping to argue with me about my opinions about a man
> > you
> > > > > didn't know did ya? And you were thinking it might be
> > inappropriate for me
> > > > > to voice opinions about him on a board devoted to those issues.
> > > > >
> > > > > Got it, I'm sure that all makes perfect sense in crazy world.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just wake up and take care of yourself, rather than your
> > fixation on him.
> > > > > > What moral, ethical, spiritual principles you have - you can
> > continue
> > > > > your
> > > > > > fixations, fantasies on Maharishi bu

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

Ha ha ha Barry, you are cracking me up.

I'm attacking your hypocrisy, your deception, your cliques, your abuses,
your taunting, your homophobic, misogynist nonsense disguised under your
deceptive writings.

No, Rick and Alex will do no such thing, because nothing has been done
against the rules of this list other than your and Curtis's deception being
exposed. Man you clueless, shameless, needy, drama queens. Disgusting,
sickening, pitiful stuff.


On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:19 PM, turquoiseb wrote:

> **
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
>  wrote:
>
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is not a fair fight Curtis. Cut him some slack.
> >
> > That was my mistake last time Steve. I believed that.
> >
> > I appreciate your balancing comments and genuine affection
> > for the guy though. I've got a harder climb on that score.
> > My sights are just focused on containment of damage this
> > time around.
>
> As long as we've stopped pulling punches, we might
> as well lay the blame for Ravi having once again
> disrupted this forum and brought it down to his
> level where it belongs -- with Rick.
>
> Rick has now -- possibly in an attempt to be the
> "nice guy" he'd like to be perceived as -- allowed
> two people who would be better placed in mental
> hospitals to roam around here free, declaring
> their Enemies Lists, making actual threats, and
> most important, *getting worse themselves*.
>
> Is there any *question* that Ravi has grown more
> insane since returning to FFL, and being placed
> in a position of being able once again to troll
> for other people's attention? Is there any
> *question* that Dan Friedman has done the same
> thing, and is at this point dangerous to
> himself and others.
>
> All of this because Rick wants to be a "nice guy"
> rather than actually PAY SOME ATTENTION to
> what is happening on the forum he created, and
> what the crazy trolls are doing to it.
>
> Alex, you were possibly privy to any "agreement"
> between Rick and Ravi, and Rick and Dan, trying
> to get them to keep their shit in their pants and
> not fling it around like monkeys. My bet is that
> Ravi was allowed to come back on the condition
> that he not start attacking Curtis and other
> people again, and that Dan was allowed to stay
> on the condition that he stop making threats
> of actual, physical violence against people here.
>
> Do you think either of those things happened?
>
> It's sad to see this place returned to the snake
> pit it was a few months ago. It's even sadder to
> realize that on some level the reason it has is
> that Rick seems to prefer it that way.
>
>  
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

King Baby Barry,

You emotionally stunted, demented, deranged, depraved, needy, drama
queenery, clueless, shameless, paranoid, delusional, narcissistic,
misogynist, homophobic LIAR..LOL

Remember all this chin-envy and envy of the biggest d**k in town is
cracking me up.

How dare you use my name directly? :-) All you have is slander and lies.
Needy, whiny, drama queen ish antics. I thought you and Curtis were the
tough, macho, white, mid-western ole boys club - bullying, taunting women,
gays?

Being goaded, insulted and humiliated as I expose, parade your deception
every day publicly must be taking it's toll. But I didn't call you needy
and shameless for nothing right?

Slander and lie with gusto - I don't think anything else helps against
me..LOL






On Sep 4, 2012, at 6:28 AM, turquoiseb  wrote:



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" 
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" 
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> > >
> > > Alex, you were possibly privy to any "agreement"
> > > between Rick and Ravi, and Rick and Dan, trying
> > > to get them to keep their shit in their pants and
> > > not fling it around like monkeys.
> >
> > The Ravi situation was strictly between Rick and Ravi.
> > I did not get a subscription request; all I got was a
> > notice that he was now a subscriber, which means Rick
> > sent him an invite. I had no knowledge or involvement.
> >
> > WRT Dan, he subscribed and posted a string of profanity
> > filled posts, and Rick told me to nuke him. When I
> > received an attempted post by the then unsubscribed Dan,
> > I wrote back to him with this: "After that string of
> > profanity filled posts the other day, Rick told me to
> > boot you off FFL. You are no longer subscribed, and
> > anything you try to post will not go through." After
> > that, it was between Dan and Rick.
>
> I have no ability to read minds but perhaps Rick thought
> these guys deserve a second chance, no-one is beyond
> redemption I think. We all hope there is such a thing
> as personal evolution after all

With all due respect to Rick, who in all likelihood
really is a nice guy, I wouldn't trust his powers
of discrimination any further than I could throw him.

With regard to Ravi, when he first encountered him,
who many people here on FFL instantly reacted to as
being in the middle of some kind of nervous break-
down, Rick considered him enlightened or awakened
or self-realized enough to include in his BATGAP
series of interviews. In the time since, Rick doesn't
seem to have considered, when allowing him to return,
that even *courts* have decided that Ravi is too
unstable to allow him access to or even visitation
rights with his own children. He certainly hasn't
noticed that he's up to his old tricks with Curtis
and others here.

With regard to Dan, it is equally disturbing that
in giving him a "second chance" after a drunken or
insane profanity meltdown that even *Judy* felt
indicated that he was having a nervous breakdown,
Rick allowed him to come back and then left him on
his own remarkably like the Dean of MUM who left
Suvender Sem on his own. As a result, Dan was able
to make threats against several *more* people here.

I, for one, am not impressed with Rick Archer's
"care and feeding" of the forum he created. As
I've said before, I think he's asleep at the
wheel.

 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 7:20 AM, feste37  wrote:

> **
>
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"  wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
>  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb 
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Alex, you were possibly privy to any "agreement"
> > > > > > between Rick and Ravi, and Rick and Dan, trying
> > > > > > to get them to keep their shit in their pants and
> > > > > > not fling it around like monkeys.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Ravi situation was strictly between Rick and Ravi.
> > > > > I did not get a subscription request; all I got was a
> > > > > notice that he was now a subscriber, which means Rick
> > > > > sent him an invite. I had no knowledge or involvement.
> > > > >
> > > > > WRT Dan, he subscribed and posted a string of profanity
> > > > > filled posts, and Rick told me to nuke him. When I
> > > > > received an attempted post by the then unsubscribed Dan,
> > > > > I wrote back to him with this: "After that string of
> > > > > profanity filled posts the other day, Rick told me to
> > > > > boot you off FFL. You are no longer subscribed, and
> > > > > anything you try to post will not go through." After
> > > > > that, it was between Dan and Rick.
> > > >
> > > > I have no ability to read minds but perhaps Rick thought
> > > > these guys deserve a second chance, no-one is beyond
> > > > redemption I think. We all hope there is such a thing
> > > > as personal evolution after all
> > >
> > > With all due respect to Rick, who in all likelihood
> > > really is a nice guy, I wouldn't trust his powers
> > > of discrimination any further than I could throw him.
> > >
> > > With regard to Ravi, when he first encountered him,
> > > who many people here on FFL instantly reacted to as
> > > being in the middle of some kind of nervous break-
> > > down, Rick considered him enlightened or awakened
> > > or self-realized enough to include in his BATGAP
> > > series of interviews. In the time since, Rick doesn't
> > > seem to have considered, when allowing him to return,
> > > that even *courts* have decided that Ravi is too
> > > unstable to allow him access to or even visitation
> > > rights with his own children. He certainly hasn't
> > > noticed that he's up to his old tricks with Curtis
> > > and others here.
> > >
> >
> > Barry, how low can you go? Leave Ravi's family out of your personal
> grudge against him. Whether you're lying about him or not, it's none of
> your damn business and certainly none of ours. His private life has no
> bearing on his participation on this forum. Shame on you.
>
> I disagree. Ravi mentioned it. If you post something here, you are sharing
> it with everyone and inviting a response, hostile or otherwise.
>

Feste - is everything going OK with you? Or are you catching on to the
chin-envy and envy of the big d**k virus that's going on around here?

I will mention my personal details, that's my choice. If I had used by
personal details to attack Barry and Curtis, then it makes sense for them
to use it back against me, but the personal details are part of my other
stories, part of my bigger journey and so they have to naturally creep up
because it's all tied together but I haven't given the entire facts here.

So that doesn't give anyone a right to use it to hit someone low -
especially when Barry so brazenly, outrageously lies about it. Barry and
Curtis cannot objectively attack anything I say about them so they resort
to slander, deception, distorting, and lying. Enthralling, enticing and
entertaining morons like you.

So Feste - you don't understand any of this - you show up here and are
talking with with your foot, ass, god knows what in your mouth and so STFU
- because what you say is not cool and doesn't make any rational, logical
sense - makes you look like a big idiot.

With this message - you have lost any respect I had for you for as an
intelligent, objective person.

Love,
Ravi



> >
> > > With regard to Dan, it is equally disturbing that
> > > in giving him a "second chance" after a drunken or
> > > insane profanity meltdown that even *Judy* felt
> > > indicated that he was having a nervous breakdown,
> > > Rick allowed him to come back and then left him on
> > > his own remarkably like the Dean of MUM who left
> > > Suvender Sem on his own. As a result, Dan was able
> > > to make threats against several *more* people here.
> > >
> > > I, for one, am not impressed with Rick Archer's
> > > "care and feeding" of the forum he created. As
> > > I've said before, I think he's asleep at the
> > > wheel.
> > >
> >
>
>  
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

Take this deception, distortion, lying, manipulation, twisting elsewhere
Curtis.

Don't parade your white man's burden, guilt wrapped around in a nice set of
beliefs as a proof of anything, you cry wolf one too many times to come
across as a honest, genuine person. Like I said your sickening, disgusting,
pitiful tactics will impress most of the naive, gullible, liberals fooled,
charmed, tricked, enticed, enthralled, entertained by your stories.

You can't resort to any objective response of my earlier messages.

You will try to manipulate the audience, manipulate Rick, you are a sick
and twisted person. Of course demented, deranged and depraved are the other
adjectives I have used as well..:-)

On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:16 AM, curtisdeltablues  wrote:

> **
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
>
> I thought you and Curtis were the
> > tough, macho, white, mid-western ole boys club - bullying, taunting
> women,> gays?
>
> Sorry to see you are falling back into your old habits. I object to this
> slanderous mischaracterization of my relationship with both women and my
> gay friends. This person does not know me personally and is an internet
> troll whose past posts where so egregious he was banned from participating
> on this forum. If you have come across this in a search of my name please
> understand that I am dealing with a difficult situation here and there will
> always be trolls like this on any open internet forum who can maliciously
> post one more slanderous post than I can refute.
>
> Not only am I not a bully, I professionally perform anti-bullying shows to
> help the efforts in schools to combat this problem. I am pro gay rights in
> all aspects of their equal lives including their right to marry and am
> appalled that women continue to be limited by their history of oppression
> in the workplace as well as in their treatment under many state's divorce
> laws.
>
> >
> > King Baby Barry,
> >
> > You emotionally stunted, demented, deranged, depraved, needy, drama
> > queenery, clueless, shameless, paranoid, delusional, narcissistic,
> > misogynist, homophobic LIAR..LOL
> >
> > Remember all this chin-envy and envy of the biggest d**k in town is
> > cracking me up.
> >
> > How dare you use my name directly? :-) All you have is slander and lies.
> > Needy, whiny, drama queen ish antics. I thought you and Curtis were the
> > tough, macho, white, mid-western ole boys club - bullying, taunting
> women,
> > gays?
> >
> > Being goaded, insulted and humiliated as I expose, parade your deception
> > every day publicly must be taking it's toll. But I didn't call you needy
> > and shameless for nothing right?
> >
> > Slander and lie with gusto - I don't think anything else helps against
> > me..LOL
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sep 4, 2012, at 6:28 AM, turquoiseb  wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Alex, you were possibly privy to any "agreement"
> > > > > between Rick and Ravi, and Rick and Dan, trying
> > > > > to get them to keep their shit in their pants and
> > > > > not fling it around like monkeys.
> > > >
> > > > The Ravi situation was strictly between Rick and Ravi.
> > > > I did not get a subscription request; all I got was a
> > > > notice that he was now a subscriber, which means Rick
> > > > sent him an invite. I had no knowledge or involvement.
> > > >
> > > > WRT Dan, he subscribed and posted a string of profanity
> > > > filled posts, and Rick told me to nuke him. When I
> > > > received an attempted post by the then unsubscribed Dan,
> > > > I wrote back to him with this: "After that string of
> > > > profanity filled posts the other day, Rick told me to
> > > > boot you off FFL. You are no longer subscribed, and
> > > > anything you try to post will not go through." After
> > > > that, it was between Dan and Rick.
> > >
> > > I have no ability to read minds but perhaps Rick thought
> > > these guys deserve a second chance, no-one is beyond
> > > redemption I think. We all hope there is such a thing
> > > as personal evolution after all
> >
&

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:30 AM, salyavin808 wrote:

> **
>
>
>
> "Being goaded, insulted and humiliated as I expose, parade your deception
> every day publicly must be taking it's toll"
>
> Somehow I doubt it, but there is a similarity in your
> insults to everyone, one could hardly call them targeted.
> I suspect a bit of the old loathing in others what you
> fear in yourself?
>
>
> Dear salyavin - yes brilliant analysis - no chin-envy here then
right?..:-). I will go hide now - I mean gotta go to work now.

Love ya - Ravi

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

I just want to add here something quick - I'm not here to share my personal
stories to titillate, woo some old farts here jaded, wearied, worn down by
their failed spiritual journeys, sold into Maharishi's con, deception - as
Nabby stated it so beautifully - it's in the fine print - what does the
fine print say? Three words - responsibility, accountability
and transparency(self-honesty).

I'm not going to elaborate my personal stories for some factual accuracy,
or to clarify the slander, lies spread by people with chin-envies and small
penis complexes.

I use my personal stories to add a certain context, to add detail, personal
touch, feel to my stories.

Because this is not some dry, intellectual, writing - no nedo-advaitic
puny, pathetic platitudes that I'm indulging in nor is it the passable,
presentable, platitudes that some Gurus deceiving and deluding themselves
as divine mothers, avatars

My writing is a love affair, regardless of who's reading or not, the
audience I'm talking to is not alien, distant to me. As I write I feel lot
of love, oneness with whom I'm communicating, writing in this case. I want
my audience to feel the primary motivation of my writing - which is
ultimately love.

I'm not trying to deceive innocent, naive, gullible audience like Barry and
Curtis do and then turn around and cry wolf, slander, lie, indulging in
their shameless, clueless, whiny, drama queenery.

I try to create a rich tapestry, a stunning mosaic to express my love, my
journey, my thoughts, on my spiritual journey - this tapestry, mosaic with
the beautiful set of English adjectives.

I don't claim to be an omniscient, omnipotent, all-knowing person - just a
simple, vulnerable, helpless, loving, created being at the mercy of this
dynamic, organic, mysterious entity known as the existence, reality or God.
All I have is my brutal-self honesty and integrity.

Of course I also use my writing to create a complex, intricate, maze, den,
web, context to GIS (Goad, insult and slay) my adversaries and cruelly
expose their biases, fears, insecurities, anxieties, their deception.

One can feel the love of my writing and reciprocate my love.

But if you are GIS'd - you can preserve your self-dignity like many others
or be shameless, clueless, manipulative, deceivers like Barry, Curtis.

Either way I strongly believe I can't ultimately touch, taint or tarnish
anyone's consciousness - the purity of their first person ontologies, their
unique expression, manifestation within this organic, dynamic, mysterious
entity.

So feel my love or slander me. It makes no difference to me.

Love,
Ravi




On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:16 AM, authfriend  wrote:

> **
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> >
> > Isn't it a bit ironic that Barry uses FFL to criticize Rick
> > who started FFL?!
>
> Well, he isn't the first to do so, and he won't be the last.
> I've done it myself on occasion.
>
> What *is* ironic is that Barry usually fawns all over Rick,
> especially for having created this forum as a place where
> everyone can feel free to say what they think.
>
>
> > As for Barry's reply to Raunchy: clearly she was not praising
> > Ravi, as Barry accused. She was objecting to using the family
> > topic to criticize Ravi.
>
> Right, she wasn't praising him in that post, but from her
> other posts, she's obviously friendly toward him. That's
> what makes Barry crazy, that other people *like* Ravi.
>
> I actually tend to agree with Barry that whatever someone
> has said about their private lives on FFL is fair game
> for comment. (Preferably appreciative or compassionate
> comment, but we know there are some here from whom that
> cannot be expected.)
>
> What I think is utterly inexcusable is to *misrepresent*
> what the person has said and embroider and distort it with
> speculations presented as if they were established fact--
> which is what Barry did.
>
> Â  For all the reasons you mention, Judy, I think that objection was spot
> on.Â
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> > From: authfriend 
>
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 11:16 AM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret
> >
> >
> > Â
> > Let's consider some facts for a change.
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Barry, how low can you go? Leave Ravi's family out of
> > > > your personal grudge against him. Whether you're lying
> > > > about him or not, it's none of your damn business and
> > > > certainly none of ours. His private life has no bearing
> > > > on his participation on this forum. Shame on you.
> > >
> > > Speaking of "asleep at the wheel," Ravi himself
> > > volunteered this information, in the context of
> > > telling people how cool he was to have flirted
> > > with his ex-wife's divorce attorney.
> >
> > Actually, here's what Ravi said:
> >
> > "My ex taunted me at the 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret

[Ravi Chivukula]

Dear Aunt Share - thanks for love, support and concern.

This is what I do, day in and day out - eat well, rest well, work well. I'm
not a masochist like these conster, fraudster Gurus, because I don't need
anything from anyone - the existence provides me and has provided me
everything I need.

In fact I only take care of myself, always true to myself, totally lost in
my beloved Rosathea, always thinking of her, the things I need to do to
impress her, why yesterday I went for labor day shopping and bought a few
Abercrombies, I think of how to win her love, admiration, respect, hoping I
will hear from her soon - the rest of all this is very accidental.

Love,
Ravi.


On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Share Long  wrote:

> **
>
>
> Ravi, just take good care of yourself, ok?  Maybe get some good rest.
> Some healthy delicious food and beverage.  Some fun exercise in sunshine
> and fresh air.  Such common sense approaches can help a lot when the old
> world starts shaking us up.  I realize you're a young, strong man, etc.
> Nonetheless, very wise to take good care of the body mind vehicle.  If only
> to be an even better lover of all that is.  Share
>
>
>   --
> *From:* Ravi Chivukula 
> *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 4, 2012 2:59 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Our Little Secret
>
>
> I just want to add here something quick - I'm not here to share my
> personal stories to titillate, woo some old farts here jaded, wearied, worn
> down by their failed spiritual journeys, sold into Maharishi's con,
> deception - as Nabby stated it so beautifully - it's in the fine print -
> what does the fine print say? Three words - responsibility, accountability
> and transparency(self-honesty).
>
> I'm not going to elaborate my personal stories for some factual accuracy,
> or to clarify the slander, lies spread by people with chin-envies and small
> penis complexes.
>
> I use my personal stories to add a certain context, to add detail,
> personal touch, feel to my stories.
>
> Because this is not some dry, intellectual, writing - no nedo-advaitic
> puny, pathetic platitudes that I'm indulging in nor is it the passable,
> presentable, platitudes that some Gurus deceiving and deluding themselves
> as divine mothers, avatars
>
> My writing is a love affair, regardless of who's reading or not, the
> audience I'm talking to is not alien, distant to me. As I write I feel lot
> of love, oneness with whom I'm communicating, writing in this case. I want
> my audience to feel the primary motivation of my writing - which is
> ultimately love.
>
> I'm not trying to deceive innocent, naive, gullible audience like Barry
> and Curtis do and then turn around and cry wolf, slander, lie, indulging in
> their shameless, clueless, whiny, drama queenery.
>
> I try to create a rich tapestry, a stunning mosaic to express my love, my
> journey, my thoughts, on my spiritual journey - this tapestry, mosaic with
> the beautiful set of English adjectives.
>
> I don't claim to be an omniscient, omnipotent, all-knowing person - just a
> simple, vulnerable, helpless, loving, created being at the mercy of this
> dynamic, organic, mysterious entity known as the existence, reality or God.
> All I have is my brutal-self honesty and integrity.
>
> Of course I also use my writing to create a complex, intricate, maze, den,
> web, context to GIS (Goad, insult and slay) my adversaries and cruelly
> expose their biases, fears, insecurities, anxieties, their deception.
>
> One can feel the love of my writing and reciprocate my love.
>
> But if you are GIS'd - you can preserve your self-dignity like many others
> or be shameless, clueless, manipulative, deceivers like Barry, Curtis.
>
> Either way I strongly believe I can't ultimately touch, taint or tarnish
> anyone's consciousness - the purity of their first person ontologies, their
> unique expression, manifestation within this organic, dynamic, mysterious
> entity.
>
> So feel my love or slander me. It makes no difference to me.
>
> Love,
> Ravi
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:16 AM, authfriend  wrote:
>
> **
>
>  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> >
> > Isn't it a bit ironic that Barry uses FFL to criticize Rick
> > who started FFL?!
>
> Well, he isn't the first to do so, and he won't be the last.
> I've done it myself on occasion.
>
> What *is* ironic is that Barry usually fawns all over Rick,
> especially for having created this forum as a place where
> everyone can feel free to say what they think.
>
>
> > As for Barry&

[FairfieldLife] Second Open Plea to Mata Amritanandamayi

[Ravi Chivukula]

http://tmblr.co/ZjaHJwSsJFPJ

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why Bevan Never Got Married?

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:48 PM, azgrey  wrote:

> **
>
>
>
> Well Mike, it worked for Judy.
>
> Kinda.After a fashion. Allegedly.
>
>
Well I request moderators to throw this moron as well as Barry who indulge
in their veiled, deceptive misogynist, homophic nonsense day in and day
out. Also Curtis who enthralls, entices and entertains us with guilt ridden
stories of African American autistic boys but is actually the moral,
spiritual, ethical guidance for these bastards and promoting old boy
cliques, always welcoming Stupid Susans but throwing veiled threats to
mature, sophisticated, intelligent women.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

Dear Sweetest, kindest, gentlest Share,

*"The only conflicting loyalties I'm experiencing are my fond memories of
Curtis from 37 years ago vs. my liking of Ravi. "*

I always love your support, concern, love but please don't sully, taint my
reputation by comparing me with Curtis who is the moral leadership for all
the veiled, concealed misogynist, homophobic agenda on this list with his
open support of Barry and azgrey. You may accept him - but please leave me
out of this. Remember I goad, insult and slay his ass day in and day out,
at my fancy, at my will, and all he can do is Strategy # 1 - try to twist,
manipulate the audience, Rick and Strategy # 2 - cry wolf, accuse others of
being racist,misogynist, homophobic.

You don't know the amount of disgust, contempt I have for these shameless,
clueless bastards, the metaphorical Rakshasaas, demons, metaphor for their
deception.

Share - I remember a beautiful story of how Divine Mother would keep
slaying this demon, but he would constantly change forms and Divine Mother
would keep on slaying him - I don't remember how it ended :-) - but this is
what Curtis is - this demon of deception who keeps changing forms- in his
case, keeps changing the context, crying wolf while using his deceptive
charm through his writing. Sickening, disgusting Rakshasaas - Curtis, Barry
and his ole boy clique.

Keep me out of it mother.

Love,
Ravi


On Sep 5, 2012, at 8:45 AM, Share Long  wrote:



Share:
  --
*From:* Robin Carlsen 
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 4, 2012 4:09 PM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's
my turn!"



Dear Share,
Robin:  You must excuse my presumption here (because it is very likely I am
wrong) but I must tell you that in this post I get to feel the most Share
that is there severed (perhaps not consciously:)) from her philosophy. It
just *seemed* to me that all you wrote here came out of your experience
unmediated by any final beliefs about what is real. Like a beautiful
accident of Share making herself available beyond what would be possible
were she solidly, as she almost always is, behind her spiritual orientation
to people and reality (which, in the weaponry and ordnance deployed by some
of us more irascible FFL posters, is sometimes--silently, mind
you--denigrated as being overly positive--and therefore impotent:)).

Share:  hi Robin, yes I will excuse your presumption if you excuse my not
going down this particular rabbit hole again.  You know, the one about my
being so positive yada yada.  As for my being impotent, it's not been my
intention to be, uh, potent.  So no problemo.  Sigh, btw, I notice I'm
feeling grumpy this morning.  Blaming it on the sugar I ate yesterday.
Somehow I've become very sensitive to sugar.  Anyway, Robin, apologies for
taking it out on you.

Robin:  Yes, Share, I felt I knew something about the beauty of the Russian
soul--its utter distinctiveness from any other peoples in the world--after
viewing that video a number of times. The feeling of collective warmth and
passion, it seemed so real and natural to me. Changed my perception of
Russia, I think. Even of Putin. I think Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, from
wherever he is now, must be happier about his Mother Russia--unless
nationality counts for nothing after death, and one becomes, unavoidably, a
universalist. But it made me want to be there among those young people--and
made me have confidence about the future of Russia.

Share:  Good!  Because I agree with something Susan said recently about how
expectations in the classroom influence a student's performance.  Perhaps
your confidence about future of Russia will have a good influence.

Robin:  I was curious about the ginkgo bilobia reference: but I have used
it daily to ward off the dementia which would be Barry's revenge against
me. I am meeting with LK on the 20th of September here in Toronto. I aim to
reprogram him as best I can so that he comes back onto FFL and says that I
am more perfect than I was when I was in Unity Consciousness.

Share:  I've heard it helps with memory and mine can be quite faulty.  I
resist supplements but every now and then I think I should add that one to
my repetoire.  Very exciting about you and LK.  Want me to check if that
date is auspicious?  [image: :) happy]

Robin:  I find myself, once I started to experience the effect of your
words upon me, acquiescing in your decision to let that karma (as *you*
call it) burn off without having to go back to where we had those
delightful exchanges--*that was good for me, Share*. :-) But now like a
previous lifetime (*definitely* a metaphor for me, inside the first person
subjectivity thing--won't use the O word, because Steve, in his earnest
desire to get as near to the truth as possible, has expressed some disquiet
about the intrinsic denotation of that word) it seems to be very much in
our past. We will let the good God assign its value, whatever it mig

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Second Open Plea to Mata Amritanandamayi

[Ravi Chivukula]

Curtis's time tested strategies, strategy #2 - cry wolf, slander others.

Intelligent people please note -

I was parodying a narrow minded conservative Indian male.

I grew up in India. I have seen conservative, narrow minded, Brahmins, in my 
own family, treat women as unholy while they were menstruating. I used to feel 
so disgusted.

But my own mother was a maverick, she fought her own physically abusive husband 
and this conservative society which looked down upon her, she made me 
sophisticated, intellectual, liberal individual. I told my mom how proud I was 
of her and that she was way ahead of her times and American women would be 
proud of her.

She brought me up with no beliefs, no religious beliefs - what a woman.

Mommy - I love you, your struggles, pain will not be in vain - you have created 
a beautiful, intelligent person, one of the most unique, your most darling, 
beloved son Ravi Chivukula.

The women that I have spent time with in Amma's cult, in the West will never 
agree with people slandering me, my gentleness, my love, respect, kindness was 
felt by all women and hope they forgive me for the derogatory words I use, but 
such is the nature of any hard hitting parody. Just think about this, why so 
many derogatory words for women but none for men. 

Love,
Ravi

On Sep 6, 2012, at 6:23 AM, "curtisdeltablues"  
wrote:

> -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula  
> wrote:
> >
> > http://tmblr.co/ZjaHJwSsJFPJ
> 
> For anyone who has stumbled on my name here in association with this person. 
> please follow this link he has proudly posted to understand who I am dealing 
> with.
> 
> http://tmblr.co/ZjaHJwSsJFPJ
> 
> >
> 
> 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Second Open Plea to Mata Amritanandamayi

[Ravi Chivukula]

Oh my most beautiful, kindest, sweetest, sophisticated, intelligent,
progressive American women,

Have you been watching Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton's speeches?

Would you follow these women or the crude, unsophisticated, uneducated
women who thinks peeing, menstruating are things that are needed to be
hidden? Does she represent post-modern 21st century values?

I'm enveloped by sadness as I think how my mother if born in America could
have been a Michelle Obama or Hillary Clinton but she was taunted, abused
for standing up to the narrow minded, Hindu, misogynist, homophobic,
conservative society.

We are at a pedestal in our spiritual, material journey - please decide if
you support Mata Amritananandamyi or Michelle Obama - you can't have both
because they are so dramatically opposite.

Love,
Ravi Chivukula

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Ravi Chivukula wrote:

> Curtis's time tested strategies, strategy #2 - cry wolf, slander others.
>
> Intelligent people please note -
>
> I was parodying a narrow minded conservative Indian male.
>
> I grew up in India. I have seen conservative, narrow minded, Brahmins, in
> my own family, treat women as unholy while they were menstruating. I used
> to feel so disgusted.
>
> But my own mother was a maverick, she fought her own physically abusive
> husband and this conservative society which looked down upon her, she made
> me sophisticated, intellectual, liberal individual. I told my mom how proud
> I was of her and that she was way ahead of her times and American women
> would be proud of her.
>
> She brought me up with no beliefs, no religious beliefs - what a woman.
>
> Mommy - I love you, your struggles, pain will not be in vain - you have
> created a beautiful, intelligent person, one of the most unique, your most
> darling, beloved son Ravi Chivukula.
>
> The women that I have spent time with in Amma's cult, in the West will
> never agree with people slandering me, my gentleness, my love, respect,
> kindness was felt by all women and hope they forgive me for the derogatory
> words I use, but such is the nature of any hard hitting parody. Just think
> about this, why so many derogatory words for women but none for men.
>
> Love,
> Ravi
>
> On Sep 6, 2012, at 6:23 AM, "curtisdeltablues" 
> wrote:
>
>
>
> -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
> >
> > http://tmblr.co/ZjaHJwSsJFPJ
>
> For anyone who has stumbled on my name here in association with this
> person. please follow this link he has proudly posted to understand who I
> am dealing with.
>
> http://tmblr.co/ZjaHJwSsJFPJ
>
> >
>
>  
>
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

Oh my sweet, kind, loving Auntie,
It had nothing to do with you.
I had an Indian friend in LA, he was smart, intelligent, he called me
"chaalu" & "kapati" - in Hindi it means someone who is clever, cunning
and deceitful.
I distort, twist, manipulate reality to create my own context to entice
and slay or goad, insult and slay - but unlike our Holiness who does
this to protect his persona, protect his biases, his belief system, his
fear, anxieties, insecurities, I use deception to expose these or just
to be playful to entice, enthrall and entertain others. Remember Krishna
used to be called Kapati - you should hang out with me, you will have
loads of fun, you will just think I'm silly - someone with not too much
beliefs, innocent enjoys my drama while people who are stuck almost
invariably get offended.
Love,Ravi

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long 
wrote:
>
> Dear Ravi,
> I was experiencing a bit of a conflict in having positive feelings for
both you and Curtis.  I wasn't comparing you to him.  Apologies
if that wasn't clearer.
> Share
>
>
>
> 
>  From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@...
> To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2012 1:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut
up; it's my turn!"
>
>
> Â
> Dear Sweetest, kindest, gentlest Share,
>
> "The only conflicting loyalties I'm experiencing are my fond memories
of Curtis from 37 years ago vs. my liking of Ravi. "
>
> I always love your support, concern, love but please don't sully,
taint my reputation by comparing me with Curtis who is the moral
leadership for all the veiled, concealed misogynist, homophobic agenda
on this list with his open support of Barry and azgrey. You may accept
him - but please leave me out of this. Remember I goad, insult and slay
his ass day in and day out, at my fancy, at my will, and all he can do
is Strategy # 1 - try to twist, manipulate the audience, Rick and
Strategy # 2 - cry wolf, accuse others of being racist,misogynist,
homophobic.
>
> You don't know the amount of disgust, contempt I have for these
shameless, clueless bastards, the metaphorical Rakshasaas, demons,
metaphor for their deception.
>
> Share - I remember a beautiful story of how Divine Mother would keep
slaying this demon, but he would constantly change forms and Divine
Mother would keep on slaying him - I don't remember how it ended :-) -
but this is what Curtis is - this demon of deception who keeps changing
forms- in his case, keeps changing the context, crying wolf while using
his deceptive charm through his writing. Sickening, disgusting
Rakshasaas - Curtis, Barry and his ole boy clique.
>
> Keep me out of it mother.
>
> Love,
> Ravi
>
>
> On Sep 5, 2012, at 8:45 AM, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:
>
>
> Â
> >Share:
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Robin Carlsen maskedzebra@...
> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> >Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 4:09 PM
> >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up;
it's my turn!"
> >
> >
> >Â
> >
> >Dear Share,
> >Robin:Â  You must excuse my presumption here (because it is very
likely I am wrong) but I must tell you that in this post I get to feel
the most Share that is there severed (perhaps not consciously:)) from
her philosophy. It just *seemed* to me that all you wrote here came out
of your experience unmediated by any final beliefs about what is real.
Like a beautiful accident of Share making herself available beyond what
would be possible were she solidly, as she almost always is, behind her
spiritual orientation to people and reality (which, in the weaponry and
ordnance deployed by some of us more irascible FFL posters, is
sometimes--silently, mind you--denigrated as being overly positive--and
therefore impotent:)).
> >
> >Share:Â  hi Robin, yes I will excuse your presumption if you
excuse my not going down this particular rabbit hole again.  You
know, the one about my being so positive yada
>  yada.  As
>  for my being impotent, it's not been my intention to be, uh,
potent.  So no problemo.  Sigh, btw, I notice I'm feeling grumpy
this morning.  Blaming it on the sugar I ate yesterday.  Somehow
I've become very sensitive to sugar.  Anyway, Robin, apologies for
taking it out on you.
> >
> >Robin:Â  Yes, Share, I felt I knew something about the beauty of
the Russian soul--its utter distinctiveness from any other peoples in
the world--after viewing that video a number of times. The feeling of
collective warmth and passion, it seemed so real and natural to me.
Chan

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

And AuntieThe big difference is these Raakshasaas, these Mahishasuras, 
these metaphorical representations of deception are totally unaware of it and 
they hide in it, masquerades themselves, totally away from reality, from truth. 
Whereas this kapati revels, raves, roves in it and ravages these 
Raakshasaas...LOL..



On Sep 7, 2012, at 9:42 AM, "Ravi Chivukula"  wrote:

> Oh my sweet, kind, loving Auntie,
> 
> 
> It had nothing to do with you.
> 
> I had an Indian friend in LA, he was smart, intelligent, he called me 
> "chaalu" & "kapati" - in Hindi it means someone who is clever, cunning and 
> deceitful.
> 
> I distort, twist, manipulate reality to create my own context to entice and 
> slay or goad, insult and slay - but unlike our Holiness who does this to 
> protect his persona, protect his biases, his belief system, his fear, 
> anxieties, insecurities, I use deception to expose these or just to be 
> playful to entice, enthrall and entertain others. Remember Krishna used to be 
> called Kapati - you should hang out with me, you will have loads of fun, you 
> will just think I'm silly - someone with not too much beliefs, innocent 
> enjoys my drama while people who are stuck almost invariably get offended.
> 
> Love,
> Ravi
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> >
> > Dear Ravi,
> > I was experiencing a bit of a conflict in having positive feelings for both 
> > you and Curtis.  I wasn't comparing you to him.  Apologies if that wasn't 
> > clearer.
> > Share
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > From: Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@...
> > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2012 1:25 AM
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; 
> > it's my turn!"
> > 
> > 
> > Â  
> > Dear Sweetest, kindest, gentlest Share,
> > 
> > "The only conflicting loyalties I'm experiencing are my fond memories of 
> > Curtis from 37 years ago vs. my liking of Ravi. "
> > 
> > I always love your support, concern, love but please don't sully, taint my 
> > reputation by comparing me with Curtis who is the moral leadership for all 
> > the veiled, concealed misogynist, homophobic agenda on this list with his 
> > open support of Barry and azgrey. You may accept him - but please leave me 
> > out of this. Remember I goad, insult and slay his ass day in and day out, 
> > at my fancy, at my will, and all he can do is Strategy # 1 - try to twist, 
> > manipulate the audience, Rick and Strategy # 2 - cry wolf, accuse others of 
> > being racist,misogynist, homophobic.
> > 
> > You don't know the amount of disgust, contempt I have for these shameless, 
> > clueless bastards, the metaphorical Rakshasaas, demons, metaphor for their 
> > deception.
> > 
> > Share - I remember a beautiful story of how Divine Mother would keep 
> > slaying this demon, but he would constantly change forms and Divine Mother 
> > would keep on slaying him - I don't remember how it ended :-) - but this is 
> > what Curtis is - this demon of deception who keeps changing forms- in his 
> > case, keeps changing the context, crying wolf while using his deceptive 
> > charm through his writing. Sickening, disgusting Rakshasaas - Curtis, Barry 
> > and his ole boy clique.
> > 
> > Keep me out of it mother.
> > 
> > Love,
> > Ravi
> > 
> > 
> > On Sep 5, 2012, at 8:45 AM, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Â  
> > >Share:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Robin Carlsen maskedzebra@...
> > >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > >Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 4:09 PM
> > >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's 
> > >my turn!"
> > > 
> > >
> > >Â  
> > >
> > >Dear Share,
> > >Robin:Â  You must excuse my presumption here (because it is very likely I 
> > >am wrong) but I must tell you that in this post I get to feel the most 
> > >Share that is there severed (perhaps not consciously:)) from her 
> > >philosophy. It just *seemed* to me that all you wrote here came out of 
> > >your experience unmediated by any final beliefs about what is real. Like a 
> > >beautiful accident of Share making herself available beyond what would be 
> > &g

Re: [FairfieldLife] Fwd: Dem. Message: 'Once You Vote Black You Never Go Back'

[Ravi Chivukula]

Thanks Dear Em - I rarely dive into politics. But we need to make sure
conservatives or anyone else are no longer electable if they stick to
legislating morality (consensual sex, relationship, marriage between two or
more consenting, mature, normal, healthy, adults), legislating a woman's
body etc and trying to rollback individual rights. This should no longer be
acceptable in this modern world - going forward.

There is lot to like about conservatives - the fiscal responsibility,
personal responsibility, accountability - my ideal politician would have
this value, be morally liberal, healthy socialism and support libertarian
values. I don't find anyone who fits that - Obama is the best out there.
Being an African American it might be easy for him to implement this
fiscal responsibility, healthy socialism, personal
responsibility,  personal accountability as well, since no one accuse him
of being racist. It will be good to have more parties - 4 would be nice
:-). So Obama for at least the next 4 years and hopefully more freedom,
choices at least 8 years from now.

Love,
Ravi


On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Emily Reyn  wrote:

> **
>
>
> The nerve of those people wearing those buttons.  How utterly racist of
> them.  I bet some of those people were, in fact, black!  My god, don't you
> realize how we've moved past this issue?  Joe Arpaio for Attorney General -
> absofuckinlutely.  I mean, really, let us go back to McCarthyism.  Let us
> bring those black racists before a commission.  The good old days...let us
> return to those days of song and segregation.  I mean, afterall, this is
> America. Racism and sexism and all the other 'ism's simply don't exist.  WE
> are above that.  WE are special.  WE are the greatest nation in the history
> of planet earth!
>
>
>
>
>   
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Fwd: Dem. Message: 'Once You Vote Black You Never Go Back'

[Ravi Chivukula]

Oops..that should be.. " consensual sex, relationship, marriage
between two or more consenting, mature, normal, healthy, adults OF ANY SEX"

On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Ravi Chivukula wrote:

> Thanks Dear Em - I rarely dive into politics. But we need to make sure
> conservatives or anyone else are no longer electable if they stick to
> legislating morality (consensual sex, relationship, marriage between two or
> more consenting, mature, normal, healthy, adults), legislating a woman's
> body etc and trying to rollback individual rights. This should no longer be
> acceptable in this modern world - going forward.
>
> There is lot to like about conservatives - the fiscal responsibility,
> personal responsibility, accountability - my ideal politician would have
> this value, be morally liberal, healthy socialism and support libertarian
> values. I don't find anyone who fits that - Obama is the best out there.
> Being an African American it might be easy for him to implement this
> fiscal responsibility, healthy socialism, personal
> responsibility,  personal accountability as well, since no one accuse him
> of being racist. It will be good to have more parties - 4 would be nice
> :-). So Obama for at least the next 4 years and hopefully more freedom,
> choices at least 8 years from now.
>
> Love,
> Ravi
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Emily Reyn wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> The nerve of those people wearing those buttons.  How utterly racist of
>> them.  I bet some of those people were, in fact, black!  My god, don't you
>> realize how we've moved past this issue?  Joe Arpaio for Attorney General -
>> absofuckinlutely.  I mean, really, let us go back to McCarthyism.  Let us
>> bring those black racists before a commission.  The good old days...let us
>> return to those days of song and segregation.  I mean, afterall, this is
>> America. Racism and sexism and all the other 'ism's simply don't exist.  WE
>> are above that.  WE are special.  WE are the greatest nation in the history
>> of planet earth!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   
>>
>
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 9:32 PM, authfriend  wrote:

> **
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
>  wrote:
> 
>
> > I don't think encouraging discord was my goal or what
> > Robin got from what I wrote, judging by his response.
>
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! 
>
> Dear heaven, what a hoot.
>
>  __.
>

Yeah same old, same old, His Holiness of the 7-layered deception,
progressively cruder, baser, grosser - master of strategy # 1 - change the
context through deception, manipulation and strategy #2 - cry wolf, slander
others - continues along his shameless, clueless, needy, whiny, drama
queenery.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

Oh ..old boy, mid-western clique pushing back on strong, mature women. This 
must be a pattern, this must be a pattern - oh please someone tell me this is a 
pattern, I beg you, don't hide this from me, not fair.



On Sep 10, 2012, at 7:43 AM, turquoiseb  wrote:

> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
>  wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
> > >  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1"  
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Talk about a hoot. I read Curtis' intent exactly as he 
> > > > > described it. I find Ann's comments perplexing. Judy's 
> > > > > and Ravi's comments speak for> themselves.
> > > > 
> > > > A glorious simpatico of ill-will. Two poisonous peas in a pod.
> > > 
> > > Also, it should be pointed out, two people who never
> > > seem to get into the long, demanding, don't-even-
> > > THINK-of-dumping-me back-and-forth that a conversation
> > > with the person they defend so fanatically would entail. 
> > > 
> > > Instead, they spend their time dumping on others who
> > > have found such conversations...uh...trying, to say
> > > the least. 
> > > 
> > > One would think that if they consider him so wise and
> > > so spiritually advanced and all, they'd be chatting
> > > him up every chance they got.
> > 
> > I have also noticed that curious fact Barry. 
> 
> One is tempted to believe that they don't really
> give much of a shit about Robin at all, except as
> a tool that they use to dump on their perceived
> enemies. 
> 
> That makes the whole thing so curious; you would
> think that they'd have a lot to talk about. :-)
> 
> 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

I'm thinking His Holiness is too offensive for HH. I have a perfect name that 
befits his stature - His Toxic Turdiness.


On Sep 10, 2012, at 9:08 AM, "authfriend"  wrote:

> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
>  wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1"  wrote:
> > >
> > > Talk about a hoot. I read Curtis' intent exactly as he described
> > > it. I find Ann's comments perplexing. Judy's and Ravi's comments
> > > speak for themselves.
> > 
> > A glorious simpatico of ill-will. Two poisonous peas in a pod.
> 
> Sorta like Curtis and Barry, huh?
> 
> Curtis is much better at disguising his ill will most of the
> time, but when he neglects to keep up the Mr. Wonderful facade,
> the toxicity of what emerges is truly awesome.
> 
> 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

Right a beautifully deceptive tale that was a grotesque, macabre display of the 
white man's guilt, burden. Because if it was sincere we wouldn't be witness 
this old boy mid western clique here day in and day out.

Doctor Dumbass - you need to polish your skills a little more so you can catch 
the deception of His Holiness veiled in his beautiful words, stories, no wonder 
I call him the 7 layer deceptive one, progressively baser, cruder and grosser.

When in doubt defer to the Jude.


On Sep 10, 2012, at 10:17 AM, doctordumb...@rocketmail.com 
 wrote:

> Doctor Dumbass wants to hear more about John-Paul. That was an awesome tale. 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula  
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm thinking His Holiness is too offensive for HH. I have a perfect name 
> > that befits his stature - His Toxic Turdiness.
> > 
> > 
> > On Sep 10, 2012, at 9:08 AM, "authfriend"  wrote:
> > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
> > >  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1"  
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Talk about a hoot. I read Curtis' intent exactly as he described
> > > > > it. I find Ann's comments perplexing. Judy's and Ravi's comments
> > > > > speak for themselves.
> > > > 
> > > > A glorious simpatico of ill-will. Two poisonous peas in a pod.
> > > 
> > > Sorta like Curtis and Barry, huh?
> > > 
> > > Curtis is much better at disguising his ill will most of the
> > > time, but when he neglects to keep up the Mr. Wonderful facade,
> > > the toxicity of what emerges is truly awesome.
> > > 
> > >
> >
> 
> 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

Thank you Doctor Dumbass-ji :-). I'm glad you realize I'm not a stupid troll or 
a crazy person like some here try to convince others with their shameless, 
clueless, needy, drama queenery here.

Regards,
Ravi


On Sep 10, 2012, at 10:39 AM, doctordumb...@rocketmail.com 
 wrote:

> DD: Ha-ha! what looks like a mountain to some is a pebble for another; "all 
> is well and wisely set"...and I enjoy your humor, and dead on perception, and 
> wisdom, immensely, Ravi-ji!!
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula  
> wrote:
> >
> > Right a beautifully deceptive tale that was a grotesque, macabre display of 
> > the white man's guilt, burden. Because if it was sincere we wouldn't be 
> > witness this old boy mid western clique here day in and day out.
> > 
> > Doctor Dumbass - you need to polish your skills a little more so you can 
> > catch the deception of His Holiness veiled in his beautiful words, stories, 
> > no wonder I call him the 7 layer deceptive one, progressively baser, cruder 
> > and grosser.
> > 
> > When in doubt defer to the Jude.
> > 
> > 
> > On Sep 10, 2012, at 10:17 AM, doctordumbass@...  
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > Doctor Dumbass wants to hear more about John-Paul. That was an awesome 
> > > tale. 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula  
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm thinking His Holiness is too offensive for HH. I have a perfect 
> > > > name that befits his stature - His Toxic Turdiness.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Sep 10, 2012, at 9:08 AM, "authfriend"  wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
> > > > >  wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1"  
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Talk about a hoot. I read Curtis' intent exactly as he described
> > > > > > > it. I find Ann's comments perplexing. Judy's and Ravi's comments
> > > > > > > speak for themselves.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > A glorious simpatico of ill-will. Two poisonous peas in a pod.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Sorta like Curtis and Barry, huh?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Curtis is much better at disguising his ill will most of the
> > > > > time, but when he neglects to keep up the Mr. Wonderful facade,
> > > > > the toxicity of what emerges is truly awesome.
> > > > > 
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > >
> >
> 
> 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

Awesome Robin, thank you. Will have to read this gem a few more times. Love you 
old man :-)


On Sep 10, 2012, at 3:00 PM, "Robin Carlsen"  wrote:

> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
> 
> Authfriend: Irony is pretty easy to detect if one is in good contact
> with reality, because the variance from reality in the
> ironic material is clear. It's really just a matter of
> common sense.
> 
> RESPONSE: But what makes the irony do its job, is its *actual* relationship 
> to reality. Irony becomes reality's comment on something less than the 
> truth--or against the truth. The reason irony works is that while the irony 
> is going on *it becomes a comment on the actual truth". 
> 
> So, for instance, my having two identities (as identified by Steve): if I was 
> not achieving some effect which could not be achieved any other way, then the 
> impression people would have gotten would be in line with Steve's experience 
> (this is a bad thing Robin is doing). But as it turned out, I was writing 
> pretty much exactly what this person would have written back to me; so the 
> irony turned on the degree to which my representation of that person's point 
> of view was *true*. 
> 
> What actually got Steve was unconsciously how powerfully he was offended by 
> how successfully I had put myself in the place of this other person. Had what 
> I done not justified itself in the effect, then it would have seemed strange 
> and indefensible--and just plain silly. But what happened there is that I 
> know my adversary so well that I knew how he would respond to what I said, so 
> I preempted him. Thus proving by the efficacy of this deployment of irony 
> that this person is very predictable in what he will say--*when he is up 
> against some challenge to his ultimate beliefs, or his personal modus 
> operandi*.
> 
> Steve's objection thus became the protest at the potency of the effect of 
> this ironic set-up: Robin speaking in the voice of his adversary. Something 
> in Steve *very much caught the irony* and reacted to it because it unsettled 
> his way of viewing the world in terms of who he wants to win--something he 
> appears to have no control over. If, the irony was not appropriate, 
> effective, justified, then Steve's reaction would be the natural one; indeed 
> it would be reality's verdict on the failure of the irony.
> 
> Irony only will have its intended effect if in its expression it is making a 
> comment upon something *objectively*. Irony doesn't work if it is expressing 
> but an opinion. Else there would be an answer to it: And if the irony does 
> what it is supposed to do, there is no response possible (from the person who 
> is the object of the irony). There must be truth in there. Irony is the way 
> nowadays where a truth gets to make its impact on persons without their 
> having the chance to defend themselves with their belief systems.
> 
> Of course the subject of the irony doesn't like it one bit and will react. 
> But the point here again is: Irony only works by having, yes, a variance from 
> reality, but in a deeper sense, by having a very deep and truthful 
> relationship with reality.
> 
> Mitt Romney's devout Mormonism (at least in his particular case) deprives him 
> of an essential element in his campaigning that Barack Obama has in spades: 
> the ability to mock himself with extreme wit and hilarity. Mitt Romney is 
> deficient on the irony front, and it will kill him in the election. He cannot 
> quite neutralize (or universalize) himself as a human being inside the 
> universe--his Mormonism runs so deep in him; it seems to have virtually 
> created him. The Broadway play *The Book of Mormon* is funnier and more 
> sophisticated and more truthful than Mitt Romney can ever be.
> 
> I have not seen the play but Matt Stone and Trey Parker have seen the irony 
> in Mormonism, and they are, even though not attacking the religious truth of 
> Mormonism, making it abundantly clear that that religion does not possess 
> enough of reality inside of it not to deserve to be mocked in the most subtle 
> ways--which is what happens in that play--even as Mormons have taken ad space 
> on the playbill: If you're going to see the musical, you should read the 
> actual Book of Mormon. For me, the ultimate stroke of irony.
> 
> I plan to spend Christmas in Manhattan. I am hoping to be able to see *The 
> Book of Mormon*. Steve should imagine himself being a believing member of The 
> Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day Saints, and come to the play with 
> me. He would realize that the laughs are being driven by the relationship 
> between reality and how Mormonism is ultimately received and judged by that 
> reality. 
> 
> I took my chances representing the views of my adversary--and from all that I 
> can tell, I fulfilled the stringent metaphysic of irony.
> 
> Now if my adversary could take what I did *and see the inadvertent irony of 
> my doing this*--thus see

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

Strategy #1 - change context, manipulate the audience, moderators

Strategy #2 - cry wolf, slander others

Psychological fingerprint - Clueless, shameless, needy, whiny drama queenery


On Sep 10, 2012, at 4:02 PM, "curtisdeltablues"  
wrote:

> Do I really have to ask you not to do this very douchey thing Robin? really?
> 
> OK then I'll ask. Please don't sign my name at the bottom of straw men 
> versions of my POV out of respect for the fact that most of us just skim 
> posts within our otherwise busy days and it is hard enough to keep track 
> without this in the mix. There were many statements in what you wrote that I 
> wouldn't want anyone to think I had generated. If you want to play fast and 
> lose with accuracy and just assume other people will keep up, please do it at 
> your expense in the future,not mine. This shit we put up on the Internet is 
> FOREVER. It carries some responsibilities. 
> 
> 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

He is totally out of control.

He doesn't realize that HE is the one that's damaging his online reputation 
here with his shameless, needy, whiny drama queenery. Not only that he has 
damaged my reputation, Judy's reputation and Robin's reputation. If he's going 
to think people will play softball with him, he doesn't understand the focus of 
this list. Jason warned me when I started posting that this was a list of 
battle hardened thugs.

Enough of this bullshit.

Either he changes his online moniker or leave this list.

STOP manipulating people and stifling discussions by constantly accusing others 
of damaging his online reputation.

Bullshit - he doesn't have any and he is the worst when it comes to protecting 
himself.

Moderators - please stop this madness !!!


On Sep 10, 2012, at 4:21 PM, "Robin Carlsen"  wrote:

> Dear Curtis,
> 
> What gets me about you is this: If you had a case against me, you should have 
> made a sincere appeal to my better side.
> 
> As it is you just injected your violence and self-righteousness into your 
> demand. This is all fake, Curtis.
> 
> I don't believe you when you are outraged--You act as if you are fucking 
> Moses on FFL.
> 
> I am willing to get into it with you again, Curtis; but I will call you out 
> each time you pull this trip on me: the attempt to terrorize me with the 
> implicit assumption that what i have done is so manifestly wrong that you 
> should not even have to tell me this.
> 
> I say you are a bullshitter, Curtis.
> 
> Robin
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
>  wrote:
> >
> > Do I really have to ask you not to do this very douchey thing Robin? really?
> > 
> > OK then I'll ask. Please don't sign my name at the bottom of straw men 
> > versions of my POV out of respect for the fact that most of us just skim 
> > posts within our otherwise busy days and it is hard enough to keep track 
> > without this in the mix. There were many statements in what you wrote that 
> > I wouldn't want anyone to think I had generated. If you want to play fast 
> > and lose with accuracy and just assume other people will keep up, please do 
> > it at your expense in the future,not mine. This shit we put up on the 
> > Internet is FOREVER. It carries some responsibilities.
> >
> 
> 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

 STOP DAMAGING ROBIN CARLSEN'S ONLINE REPUTATION 

Strategy #1 - change context, manipulate the audience, moderators

Strategy #2 - cry wolf, slander others

Psychological fingerprint - Clueless, shameless, needy, whiny drama queenery


On Sep 10, 2012, at 4:54 PM, "curtisdeltablues"  
wrote:

> I don't know what this is all about Robin and have stopped caring. Write 
> whatever you want, signing any name you want like a happy little troll if 
> that is how you roll here. You aren't gunna strong arm me into interacting 
> with the shit you wrote to defend myself. I didn't write it and object to my 
> name on it. For any decent person that should be enough. 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen"  wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
> >  wrote:
> > 
> > Curtis: Do I really have to ask you not to do this very douchey thing 
> > Robin? really?
> > 
> > Robin: Not douchey at all, Curtis. It could only be douchey if I falsified 
> > you in some way. And then everyone--not just you--would feel this. 
> > 
> > Curtis: OK then I'll ask. Please don't sign my name at the bottom of straw 
> > men versions
> > of my POV out of respect for the fact that most of us just skim posts 
> > within our
> > otherwise busy days and it is hard enough to keep track without this in the 
> > mix.
> > 
> > Robin: Show me in some *essential* way that these two representations of 
> > you were "straw men versions of [your] POV". Because if they are--this is 
> > the fourth time I have said this--*you have defeated and disproven the 
> > irony potential of these two posts*. Because their irony consists *only* in 
> > the fact that they bear a very real correspondence with the truth. That is, 
> > this indeed is what you would say to Robin. *In principle*.
> > 
> > Curtis: There were many statements in what you wrote that I wouldn't want 
> > anyone to
> > think I had generated. If you want to play fast and lose with accuracy and 
> > just
> > assume other people will keep up, please do it at your expense in the 
> > future,not
> > mine. This shit we put up on the Internet is FOREVER. It carries some
> > responsibilities.
> > 
> > Robin: I want you to show me where I "play fast and lose with accuracy" and 
> > "statements which [I] wrote that [you] wouldn't want anyone to think [you] 
> > had generated".
> > 
> > Your friend Steve thought the first post at least *did* represent you 
> > accurately. Why don't you tell him how wrongheaded he was, given his 
> > extreme disposition to see you in the golden light of your beauty.
> > 
> > Come on, Curtis: Let's get real. I struck a blow and it hurt and you are 
> > trying to call the cops on me.
> > 
> > April Fools: that's pretty much all it was, Curtis. I gave myself a good 
> > beating by being you talking back to me. I thought so, anyway.
> > 
> > Now let's kiss and make up. For Share's sake if not for ours.
> >
> 
> 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

Not to mention the charge of "impersonation", does this guy understand the 
meaning?

Why is this old boy, mid western clique damaging my hero's online reputation?

Moderators please..


On Sep 10, 2012, at 5:10 PM, "authfriend"  wrote:

> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1"  wrote:
> >
> > You just don't get it Robin. No one likes to be mispresented, or
> > impersonated. I think it 's pretty simple.
> 
> No, YOU don't get it, Steve. That isn't the issue. Curtis is
> within his rights to ask Robin to stop. Curtis is not within
> his rights (ethically, at any rate) to claim Robin has
> misrepresented the kind of thing he might say about Robin.
> 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "maskedzebra" 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Curtis,
> > >
> > > Take the two instances where I have attempted to represent your voice,
> > and specify which passages in either post you feel are untruthful; that
> > is, you would not say what I have you saying. "There were many
> > statements in what you wrote that I wouldn't want anyone to think I had
> > generated". If there are such statements, this tends to defeat my
> > argument. I would like some examples. Once you provide these, I will
> > arrange--I am sure either Rick and Alex can do this--to head each of
> > these posts with:
> > >
> > > ROBIN PRETENDS HE IS CURTIS. HE ISN'T REALLY. NONE OF WHAT FOLLOWS IS
> > WHAT CURTIS WOULD DREAM OF SAYING. THIS POST HAS NOTHING DO WITH CURTIS.
> > >
> > > I am sure this will clear up the problem, won't it, Curtis?
> > >
> > > You are such a sweet and loveable guy.
> > >
> > > Oh, by the way, I do believe I represented your sentiments exactly.
> > >
> > > I would like to hear you refute what I have said so I can imagine how
> > I could have been wrong here.
> > >
> > > If you would not have said (in principle) what i have you saying then
> > it means the irony did not--to use a Share word--"fly".
> > >
> > > If you can sincerely show me examples of statements--in either
> > post--which are false in their attempt to speak in your voice, I need to
> > see them. Because, to repeat myself for the third time, it means I did
> > not succeed in what I attempted.
> > >
> > > Now let us love one another, Curtis. I have followed you very closely
> > for over a year. What i said in both posts for me was Curtis all the
> > way. Just not as witty, not as hard-hitting, not as clever, not as
> > colorful.
> > >
> > > For me, everything is forever.
> > >
> > > Robin
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Do I really have to ask you not to do this very douchey thing Robin?
> > really?
> > > >
> > > > OK then I'll ask. Please don't sign my name at the bottom of straw
> > men versions of my POV out of respect for the fact that most of us just
> > skim posts within our otherwise busy days and it is hard enough to keep
> > track without this in the mix. There were many statements in what you
> > wrote that I wouldn't want anyone to think I had generated. If you want
> > to play fast and lose with accuracy and just assume other people will
> > keep up, please do it at your expense in the future,not mine. This shit
> > we put up on the Internet is FOREVER. It carries some responsibilities.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

Curtis - No, it's your formula that's getting jaded, worn-out and painful
to watch, you are humiliating yourself - trying to manipulate, deceive,
threaten others to stifle discussion here. You know what? I faced the tough
initiation to FFL and not for a moment I indulged in your shameless, whiny,
drama queenery. Robin did as well, Bob Price did as well.

You have cried wolf too many times to be taken seriously. You know why I
came after you in January, you started to slander me my trying to twist my
innocent tale of that 19 years old trying to cajole me into buying a drink
for her on New Year's day. Yet you manipulated everyone into believing I
was flooding search engine, I was destroying your online reputation. Your
cry wolf strategy of your "online reputation" is getting stale, barn yard
stinkish, Curtis, grow some balls or just change your online moniker don't
try to shut everyone up here - everyone knows what kind of place FFL is -
Robin said it well - don't act like the Moses dare I say Jesus of this list.

You know why no one other than Robin, Judy stand up to you - because of
these very manipulation, deception, coercion you indulge in when someone
calls your bullshit. All of you have is the idiot Steve and the King Baby
to support you - your old boy, mid-western clique.

Here's a free clue - John Paul is not working out, time to create some
other piece of beautiful writing to con the gullible here - just don't get
into a debate because you will start looking like the clueless fool you
are.


On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:43 PM, curtisdeltablues <
curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> **
>
>
> OK so I get the formula. I say something that isn't what I would say and
> you dance around why you said them. So it is all good for you even though I
> would never say your days are numbered or that I was going to humble you
> and would never even mean that which is something I know because I am,
> after all, myself.
>
> You are fucking with me Robin and you got my goat a little and you even
> got some troll friends to pile on. And for them perhaps your post was just
> perfect. Sorry to spoil your little troll party with my actual POV.
>
> I read you as a wordy Ravi now Robin. Same intention. You are as spiteful
> as Judy and you've had your little fun at my expense. I hope you are
> sitting smug in your trollness. Is smells like a barnyard to me.
>
> If you wanted to "send me up" without being an asshole there were many
> ways to do it. Your choosing this way is most telling.
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" 
> wrote:
> >
> > Admission: some poetic license on: Your days are numbered. And the
> humble thing, that too was hyperbole. I admit to pushing the envelope a
> little there. But still IN THE MAIN my two posts represent your fundamental
> response to Robin Carlsen--inside the polemic of our relationship, Curtis.
> Find some other ones. This is getting fun. Because if you cite examples
> they must be sufficient in their cumulative effect to vitiate the essential
> truth of the two posts. Else MY IRONY HAS FAILED.
> >
> > Good start. Keep going. Find some other ones. These ones separated out
> from the whole seem to suggest Robin was pressing things a little. But if
> you take the GIST of the posts, Curtis, they are you. I could not ENTIRELY
> be sober there; else people WOULD REALLY BELIEVE IT WAS YOU. So the
> exaggeration WAS TO PROTECT YOU.
> >
> > It all works, Curtis. Robin sending you up, but making sure at the same
> time that in the end it was not you. But yet IT WAS YOU.
> >
> > Let's keep it going, Curtis.
> >
> > Robin
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
>  wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" 
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > You just don't get it Robin. No one likes to be mispresented, or
> > > > > impersonated. I think it 's pretty simple.
> > > >
> > > > No, YOU don't get it, Steve. That isn't the issue. Curtis is
> > > > within his rights to ask Robin to stop. Curtis is not within
> > > > his rights (ethically, at any rate) to claim Robin has
> > > > misrepresented the kind of thing he might say about Robin.
> > >
> > > Really? So I have threatened Robin that his days on FFL are numbered?
> That I will humble him? I have to make a case for how he misrepresented me
> to get him to stop?
> > >
> > > You don't get the issue Judy. You are following Robin's lead to coerce
> me into going point by point to refute his made-up bullshit. As if that is
> the main point of why it might not be cool to make up shit and sign other
> people's names.
> > >
> > > Judy, your eyes are brown on this one. Guess why.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "maskedzebra" 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dear Curtis,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Take the two instances where I have attempted to represent your
> vo

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:08 PM, authfriend  wrote:

> **
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan"  wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey now, I'm standing up for Curtis, aren't I :) Â It's O.K.
> Curtis...your reputation is safe. Â No worries. Â
> >
> > I'm with you, Emily, and Curtis, on this. Altho most people won't bother
> to spend a minute reading this argumentative, odd stuff (good for them!),
> my guess is that if they did, about 99% would side with Curtis. Thing is,
> the other 1% are the ones making the fuss, the noise.
>
> JESUS. Poor Susan! Maybe she should give a course in
> selective reading.
>
>
What's new - I should have clarified it better - old boy clique and their
women who just support them, no questions asked, Susans, Sals - just light
their cigarettes and fill up their drinks..wow !!! Amazing stuff this. LOL..

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Susan  wrote:

> **
>
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey now, I'm standing up for Curtis, aren't I :) Â It's O.K.
> Curtis...your reputation is safe. Â No worries. Â
>
> I'm with you, Emily, and Curtis, on this. Altho most people won't bother
> to spend a minute reading this argumentative, odd stuff (good for them!),
> my guess is that if they did, about 99% would side with Curtis. Thing is,
> the other 1% are the ones making the fuss, the noise.
>
>
OMG Susan you are absolutely clueless, it's as if English is not your first
language, OMG it's just mind blowing, I can never believe the crap you post
every single time - you and Steve are such a disgrace here of course along
with Curtis and Barry.

I often wonder if ignorance(Steve, Susan) or deception(Curtis, Barry)  is
the worst - you know what I can't decide.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Ravi Chivukula wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Susan  wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hey now, I'm standing up for Curtis, aren't I :) Â It's O.K.
>> Curtis...your reputation is safe. Â No worries. Â
>>
>> I'm with you, Emily, and Curtis, on this. Altho most people won't bother
>> to spend a minute reading this argumentative, odd stuff (good for them!),
>> my guess is that if they did, about 99% would side with Curtis. Thing is,
>> the other 1% are the ones making the fuss, the noise.
>>
>>
> OMG Susan you are absolutely clueless, it's as if English is not your
> first language, OMG it's just mind blowing, I can never believe the crap
> you post every single time - you and Steve are such a disgrace here of
> course along with Curtis and Barry.
>
> I often wonder if ignorance(Steve, Susan) or deception(Curtis, Barry)  is
> the worst - you know what I can't decide.
>

Let's call it a spectrum, the ID Spectrum - Ignorance, deception spectrum =
deceiving is ignorance and ignorance is deception. Sickening and pitiful
regardless.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

Don't you start now Emily.

Curtis.


On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Emily Reyn  wrote:

> **
>
>
> Hey now, I'm standing up for Curtis, aren't I :)  It's O.K. Curtis...your
> reputation is safe.  No worries.
>
>   --
> *From:* Ravi Chivukula 
> *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Monday, September 10, 2012 7:23 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut
> up; it's my turn!"
>
>
> Curtis - No, it's your formula that's getting jaded, worn-out and painful
> to watch, you are humiliating yourself - trying to manipulate, deceive,
> threaten others to stifle discussion here. You know what? I faced the tough
> initiation to FFL and not for a moment I indulged in your shameless, whiny,
> drama queenery. Robin did as well, Bob Price did as well.
>
> You have cried wolf too many times to be taken seriously. You know why I
> came after you in January, you started to slander me my trying to twist my
> innocent tale of that 19 years old trying to cajole me into buying a drink
> for her on New Year's day. Yet you manipulated everyone into believing I
> was flooding search engine, I was destroying your online reputation. Your
> cry wolf strategy of your "online reputation" is getting stale, barn yard
> stinkish, Curtis, grow some balls or just change your online moniker don't
> try to shut everyone up here - everyone knows what kind of place FFL is -
> Robin said it well - don't act like the Moses dare I say Jesus of this list.
>
> You know why no one other than Robin, Judy stand up to you - because of
> these very manipulation, deception, coercion you indulge in when someone
> calls your bullshit. All of you have is the idiot Steve and the King Baby
> to support you - your old boy, mid-western clique.
>
> Here's a free clue - John Paul is not working out, time to create some
> other piece of beautiful writing to con the gullible here - just don't get
> into a debate because you will start looking like the clueless fool you
> are.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:43 PM, curtisdeltablues <
> curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> **
>
>  OK so I get the formula. I say something that isn't what I would say and
> you dance around why you said them. So it is all good for you even though I
> would never say your days are numbered or that I was going to humble you
> and would never even mean that which is something I know because I am,
> after all, myself.
>
> You are fucking with me Robin and you got my goat a little and you even
> got some troll friends to pile on. And for them perhaps your post was just
> perfect. Sorry to spoil your little troll party with my actual POV.
>
> I read you as a wordy Ravi now Robin. Same intention. You are as spiteful
> as Judy and you've had your little fun at my expense. I hope you are
> sitting smug in your trollness. Is smells like a barnyard to me.
>
> If you wanted to "send me up" without being an asshole there were many
> ways to do it. Your choosing this way is most telling.
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" 
> wrote:
> >
> > Admission: some poetic license on: Your days are numbered. And the
> humble thing, that too was hyperbole. I admit to pushing the envelope a
> little there. But still IN THE MAIN my two posts represent your fundamental
> response to Robin Carlsen--inside the polemic of our relationship, Curtis.
> Find some other ones. This is getting fun. Because if you cite examples
> they must be sufficient in their cumulative effect to vitiate the essential
> truth of the two posts. Else MY IRONY HAS FAILED.
> >
> > Good start. Keep going. Find some other ones. These ones separated out
> from the whole seem to suggest Robin was pressing things a little. But if
> you take the GIST of the posts, Curtis, they are you. I could not ENTIRELY
> be sober there; else people WOULD REALLY BELIEVE IT WAS YOU. So the
> exaggeration WAS TO PROTECT YOU.
> >
> > It all works, Curtis. Robin sending you up, but making sure at the same
> time that in the end it was not you. But yet IT WAS YOU.
> >
> > Let's keep it going, Curtis.
> >
> > Robin
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
>  wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" 
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > You just don't get it Robin. No one likes to be mispresented, or
> > 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

LOL.. 

P.S I didn't know you smoked - imagine this, you, I and Judy (if she consented 
to smoke one again) smoking..what fun..LOL


On Sep 10, 2012, at 8:59 PM, Emily Reyn  wrote:

> Sorry, I had to step outside for a smoke after that scene.   
> 
> Susan picked up on my very real appreciation for Curtis.  Let me tell you, if 
> Robin pulls a number like this on me, I will post a picture of my incredibly 
> adorable terrier, and metaphorically roll over and ask him to rub my stomach. 
>   
> 
> From: Robin Carlsen 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 8:43 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my 
> turn!"
> 
>  
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan"  wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey now, I'm standing up for Curtis, aren't I :) Â It's O.K. 
> > > Curtis...your reputation is safe. Â No worries. Â
> > 
> > I'm with you, Emily, and Curtis, on this. Altho most people won't bother to 
> > spend a minute reading this argumentative, odd stuff (good for them!), my 
> > guess is that if they did, about 99% would side with Curtis. Thing is, the 
> > other 1% are the ones making the fuss, the noise. 
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE
> 
> 
> > > From: Ravi Chivukula 
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 7:23 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; 
> > > it's my turn!"
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Â  
> > > Curtis - No, it's your formula that's getting jaded, worn-out and painful 
> > > to watch, you are humiliating yourself - trying to manipulate, deceive, 
> > > threaten others to stifle discussion here. You know what? I faced the 
> > > tough initiation to FFL and not for a moment I indulged in your 
> > > shameless, whiny, drama queenery. Robin did as well, Bob Price did as 
> > > well.
> > > 
> > > You have cried wolf too many times to be taken seriously. You know why I 
> > > came after you in January, you started to slander me my trying to twist 
> > > my innocent tale of that 19 years old trying to cajole me into buying a 
> > > drink for her on New Year's day. Yet you manipulated everyone into 
> > > believing I was flooding search engine, I was destroying your online 
> > > reputation. Your cry wolf strategy of your "online reputation" is getting 
> > > stale, barn yard stinkish, Curtis, grow some balls or just change your 
> > > online moniker don't try to shut everyone up here - everyone knows what 
> > > kind of place FFL is - Robin said it well - don't act like the Moses dare 
> > > I say Jesus of this list.
> > > 
> > > You know why no one other than Robin, Judy stand up to you - because of 
> > > these very manipulation, deception, coercion you indulge in when someone 
> > > calls your bullshit. All of you have is the idiot Steve and the King Baby 
> > > to support you - your old boy, mid-western clique.
> > > 
> > > Here's a free clue - John Paul is not working out, time to create some 
> > > other piece of beautiful writing to con the gullible here - just don't 
> > > get into a debate because you will start looking like the clueless fool 
> > > you are. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:43 PM, curtisdeltablues  
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >Â  
> > > >OK so I get the formula. I say something that isn't what I would say and 
> > > >you dance around why you said them. So it is all good for you even 
> > > >though I would never say your days are numbered or that I was going to 
> > > >humble you and would never even mean that which is something I know 
> > > >because I am, after all, myself.
> > > >
> > > >You are fucking with me Robin and you got my goat a little and you even 
> > > >got some troll friends to pile on. And for them perhaps your post was 
> > > >just perfect. Sorry to spoil your little troll party with my actual POV.
> > > >
> > > >I read you as a wordy Ravi now Robin. Same intention. You are as 
> > > >spiteful as Judy and you've had your little fun at my expense. I hope 
> > > 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

Thanks Dear Em - its all good. I don't care now, I had so much fun today.

XOXO


On Sep 10, 2012, at 9:18 PM, Emily Reyn  wrote:

> Ravi:  The smoking reference was in reference to the video - check the video. 
>  Sorry, I'll settle down, promiseas soon as I pour myself a scotch.  
> 
> From: Ravi Chivukula 
> To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 9:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's 
> my turn!"
> 
>  
> LOL.. 
> 
> P.S I didn't know you smoked - imagine this, you, I and Judy (if she 
> consented to smoke one again) smoking..what fun..LOL
> 
> 
> On Sep 10, 2012, at 8:59 PM, Emily Reyn  wrote:
> 
>>  
>> Sorry, I had to step outside for a smoke after that scene.   
>> 
>> Susan picked up on my very real appreciation for Curtis.  Let me tell you, 
>> if Robin pulls a number like this on me, I will post a picture of my 
>> incredibly adorable terrier, and metaphorically roll over and ask him to rub 
>> my stomach.   
>> 
>> From: Robin Carlsen 
>> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 8:43 PM
>> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my 
>> turn!"
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan"  wrote:
>> >
>> > 
>> > 
>> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn  wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hey now, I'm standing up for Curtis, aren't I :) Â It's O.K. 
>> > > Curtis...your reputation is safe. Â No worries. Â
>> > 
>> > I'm with you, Emily, and Curtis, on this. Altho most people won't bother 
>> > to spend a minute reading this argumentative, odd stuff (good for them!), 
>> > my guess is that if they did, about 99% would side with Curtis. Thing is, 
>> > the other 1% are the ones making the fuss, the noise. 
>> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE
>> 
>> 
>> > > From: Ravi Chivukula 
>> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>> > > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 7:23 PM
>> > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; 
>> > > it's my turn!"
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > Â  
>> > > Curtis - No, it's your formula that's getting jaded, worn-out and 
>> > > painful to watch, you are humiliating yourself - trying to manipulate, 
>> > > deceive, threaten others to stifle discussion here. You know what? I 
>> > > faced the tough initiation to FFL and not for a moment I indulged in 
>> > > your shameless, whiny, drama queenery. Robin did as well, Bob Price did 
>> > > as well.
>> > > 
>> > > You have cried wolf too many times to be taken seriously. You know why I 
>> > > came after you in January, you started to slander me my trying to twist 
>> > > my innocent tale of that 19 years old trying to cajole me into buying a 
>> > > drink for her on New Year's day. Yet you manipulated everyone into 
>> > > believing I was flooding search engine, I was destroying your online 
>> > > reputation. Your cry wolf strategy of your "online reputation" is 
>> > > getting stale, barn yard stinkish, Curtis, grow some balls or just 
>> > > change your online moniker don't try to shut everyone up here - everyone 
>> > > knows what kind of place FFL is - Robin said it well - don't act like 
>> > > the Moses dare I say Jesus of this list.
>> > > 
>> > > You know why no one other than Robin, Judy stand up to you - because of 
>> > > these very manipulation, deception, coercion you indulge in when someone 
>> > > calls your bullshit. All of you have is the idiot Steve and the King 
>> > > Baby to support you - your old boy, mid-western clique.
>> > > 
>> > > Here's a free clue - John Paul is not working out, time to create some 
>> > > other piece of beautiful writing to con the gullible here - just don't 
>> > > get into a debate because you will start looking like the clueless fool 
>> > > you are. 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:43 PM, curtisdeltablues  
>> > > wrote:
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > >Â  
>&

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Pundits' Union formed in Fairfield, Iowa

[Ravi Chivukula]

Dear Emily - sinful heathen - that sounds dirty doesn't it..LOL...nothing beats 
Southern California dear, I'm sold and you know I stayed in Seattle for 6 
years. You know what I was in Seattle for a few days in June and I completely 
forgot about you. Oh well.

Love,
Ravi

On Sep 10, 2012, at 9:12 PM, Emily Reyn  wrote:

> Dear Buck, sinful heathen that I am, I'll have you know I am now praying for 
> world peace.  Who knows, perhaps next month, I will be meditating for world 
> peace.  It's the Maharishi Effect in action.  You won't see me in the Golden 
> Dome of Pure Knowledge though, it's either too hot or too cold in Iowa.  I 
> like the dark, damp, rainy weather along a rocky coast.  Emily.  
> 
> From: Buck 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 8:06 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Pundits' Union formed in Fairfield, Iowa
> 
>  
> Om Jeez, did you see this trash posted here earlier today as creativity?
> 
> Dear FFL Moderators, as an experienced and old conservative meditator here 
> I'm concerned for the integrity of our FFL with Yahoo-groups over this kind 
> of Obscenity being posted here.
> 
> These people. They are doing it again bringing and posting smut here.
> Spiritually I am completely offended by this kind of smut-peddling being 
> posted here by these people. They are using our list's open-ness against us 
> for their own prurient interests. It is needlessly inflammatory, extremely 
> low-brow and completely discouraging to any civil discourse of the community. 
> Moderators, you simply must be more pro-active in protecting the spiritual 
> integrity of our FFL forum.. Do your duty and do something. Be forthright and 
> bold about these nattering nabobs of negativity posting this trash on our 
> list. Their coming to FFL mostly as immigrants with little stake we have now 
> more than our share of them. Nattering nabobs of negativism they have formed 
> their own 4-H Club -- the hopeless, hysterical hypochondriacs of history. 
> Un-repentant they have nothing of spiritual worth to offer here. Not just 
> shunned, they should not allowed to post on FFL. 
> Kindly,
> -Buck 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> > [Explicative text Deleted]
> 
> 
> 
> 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

This was cute and loving Em, I'm sure my Auntie loved it :-)


On Sep 11, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Emily Reyn  wrote:

> P.S.  Dear Share, I was serious here.  I hope your day goes splendidly.  
> Emily.
> 
> From: Emily Reyn 
> To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 10:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's 
> my turn!"
> 
> Dear Share:
> 
> I am sorry
> Please forgive me
> I love you
> Thank you
> 
> Love, FFL
> 
> From: Share Long 
> To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 2:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's 
> my turn!"
> 
>  
> Hi everyone, I was at writing group for 2 hours this afternoon, then 1 hour 
> Sedona Method with my partner in Sydney, now off to Dome.  Below is the email 
> Robin send me offline last night and above that my reply to him.  Enjoy 
> Share
> 
> Dear Robin,
> I never thought any of the things about you that you accuse me of below.  I 
> never thought you were careless about my heart.  I never thought you were a 
> bully.  I never thought you lacked regard for me.  I never thought you were 
> self centered.  I never thought you were a rat.
> 
> I expressed innocent and real joy at the beautiful Russian flash mob you 
> posted.  You replied by saying that you sensed I was being the real Share but 
> that you were probably wrong.  This is what hurt me.
> 
> What I attributed your comment to was your taking on the role of a teacher of 
> what is real.  You yourself talked about that as being your destiny and in 
> your DNA.  So this is where I think you were coming from.
> 
> Of course I haven't known you very long and then only online.  So I don't 
> claim to know you that well.  But I do sense that you are more developed than 
> me.  Maybe that's why I don't understand you.  
> 
> Maybe I never will.  I can promise that I will do my best.  And that I 
> continue to do whatever I can to develop my ability to love.  But I will 
> probably make more mistakes along the way.
> 
> Again, I apologize for my part in all this upset.  I hope we can put it 
> behind us.  
> 
> Even here I can sense an ocean between us.  It makes me feel sad.  I was 
> telling my pastoral counselor today that I sense that you live at a very deep 
> level of life.  That you experience layers and layers of richness and attempt 
> to convey that in your writing.  Perhaps because of my chaotic early 
> childhood, I am more comfortable with simplicity.  I hope we can find a 
> meeting ground that is comfortable and even joyful for us both.
> Share  
> From: Robin Carlsen 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 12:39 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my 
> turn!"
> 
>  
> Dear Share,
> 
> Here is the problem: when you accuse someone of behaving in a way which 
> clearly carries with it a reasonable judgment that that person is: careless, 
> egotistical, cruel, thoughtless, insensitive, manipulative, or dishonest--I 
> am not saying you directly accused me of being any of these things, but you 
> must hold on here--you must make contact with the origin, cause, reality 
> which has produced this behaviour. In the person with whom you are displeased.
> 
> What was totally astonishing and incomprehensible to me, Share, was your 
> total misreading of the person Robin. Let me explain: if I actually 
> consciously--or even otherwise--did something which represented some lack of 
> respect or regard for your person, then what that means is that when I did 
> this I was being less than I could be, or even I was not being true to you.
> 
> The inference, the implication, of your judging me as you did requires 
> somehow for your disapprobation to touch my conscience, touch my heart, 
> produce some recognition in me that I failed you in some way--whether 
> inadvertently or through my own self-centeredness--or whatever.
> 
> But here is where you were right off, Share: Robin, me, I am not a person 
> even capable of doing what you accused me of doing. So what you engendered 
> immediately inside me when I read that first post in which you announced you 
> were breaking things off was this: Share Long is 100% wrong about Robin. I am 
> a sincere and loving and innocent person (Yes, with those "wounds" you refer 
> to). What you did by announcing you were going to end our 
> communication--regardless of how you later qualified it, recontextualized it, 
> mitigated it or whatever--was to make Robin have an experience of himself as 
> if he were an innocent martyr.
> 
> There was not a trace of guilt, recognition, awareness in me of having ever 
> done anything to deserve the response I got from you, Share. Something 
> obviously got fouled up but good--But this does not happen to me, Share. 
> People understand me. I am unambiguous, I am clear, I am keen to the death to 
> make myself an

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

Bullshit. There is such a thing as irony, sarcasm. Barry does it always, I do 
it, Robin is the master of irony, many others do it.

Please do us a favor and get another online moniker. Rather than trying to 
subtly manipulate, deceive and coerce to stifle open, healthy discussions here. 
Complaining loudly, crying wolf, bogey man, straw man arguments, 
complaining/manipulating the moderators - as Barry says - needy, whiny drama 
queenery. You are not the Moses of FFL.



On Sep 11, 2012, at 7:18 AM, "curtisdeltablues"  
wrote:

> The technique of trying to write from someone else's POV can be useful to 
> promote understanding. That is not how it was being used here. So the front 
> that I need to show Robin where he misrepresented my POV is all a ruse. This 
> is a mockery piece disguised as Robin's scary brilliance to imitate another 
> poster's POV. Then it became a vehicle for the troll jackals to to their 
> thing. 
> 
> Mocking me is fine, just don't sign my name. Pretty simple? No, not in troll 
> world. The fact that it might bug me to have my name signed to a post that 
> makes me out to be an effete drama teacher who revels in fey triumphalist 
> statements went over the heads of the troll revelers, intoxicated with their 
> sturdy goblets of human baby blood as they danced around the flickering 
> flames of having taunted someone online and gotten him to respond. It should 
> have been enough that I said it misrepresented me, because I AM me. I might 
> know. But both Judy and Robin have made such a huge fucking deal (Judy even 
> accusing me of lying about it) and Emily weighing in that it was just so 
> wonderful, I thought I would take a few minutes to use this piece to show 
> Robin that he not only doesn't understand my actual POV, he sucks at 
> imitating my style because he is locked in his own.
> 
> This will do no good because they just want to argue with me about whether or 
> not it represents my own POV. It will satisfy no one and lead to more 
> trollery. But it will now serve my own purpose of illustrating for anyone 
> interested that Robin does not understand my perspective, nor is he 
> interested in doing so. 
> 
> So you wanted it, and now you got it.
> 
> But before I start lets look at how low Robin lowered the bar as he taunted 
> me to do this:
> 
> > ROBIN PRETENDS HE IS CURTIS. HE ISN'T REALLY. NONE OF WHAT FOLLOWS IS> > > 
> > WHAT CURTIS WOULD DREAM OF SAYING. THIS POST HAS NOTHING DO WITH CURTIS.
> 
> Of course the idea that NONE of it is anything I would dream of saying is a 
> loaded deck. Even a broken clock is right twice a day. So knowing this 
> exercise will do no good, I begin.
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen"  wrote:
> >
> > Dear Robin:
> > 
> > I think, Robin, you are way out of line here. As a matter of fact *I never 
> > even read your post*. But now having read it, I can tell you: *It doesn't 
> > make it, Robin*,
> 
> First false voice. This first line is a simple objection made flamboyant with 
> unnecessary long Robin phrases that will also riddle the rest of this piece.
> 
> Me: I might phrase this: "I didn't read your post at first, but since I have, 
> I have some issues to raise."
> 
> R: and your confident assertions
> 
> ME I might use this phrase.
> 
> R: about your use of irony in relation to me is itself a form of irony.
> 
> ME:
> 
> I would never say this because Robin uses the term "irony" as a gentile name 
> for his mockery. I specifically don't use the term with him because he has 
> mutilated it as much as he has "ontology" so that in the context of 
> discussion with him it is useless, having drifted too far from its common 
> usage. 
> 
> R Because--listen up, Robin--you don't 'get' me at all,
> 
> Me: Pure Robin's flamboyant voice. The "listen up" phrase is condescension. 
> It automatically turns off the reader ahead of time. If I decide to be 
> condescending (and I am not above that) you will know it halfway through the 
> simile chain that I am being a dick. I would never telegraph a punch like 
> this. It comes from Robin's overconfidence. 
> 
> R: and the words you put in my mouth there were a misrepresentation of what I 
> might have said to you. 
> 
> Anyone could have said this phrase and it could be true of Robin because he 
> does this a lot, and not only to me.
> 
> R: Look, Robin, I think you are a good guy, very sincere and all that;>
> 
> Me: I wouldn't say this because I don't believe any of it. Robin is a complex 
> guy and in the past I have enjoyed interacting with him. But I don't for a 
> moment believe he is a "good guy" he often comes off as a real prick as he 
> has in this exchange. And I would never claim that he was sincere because I 
> don't believe he is. In watching how he dealt with Share I could see how much 
> of the old Robin Guru is still kicking. This is not nice, it is not sincere, 
> and this may be the worst representation of my POV in the piece.
> 
> R: but you have o

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

Not to mention how he says below that he wasn't worried about his reputation 
after all when he clearly accused Robin of trying to do the very thing he 
denies now.

Too many contradictions piling here and stinking up the place.


On Sep 11, 2012, at 12:04 PM, "authfriend"  wrote:

> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
>  wrote:
> 
> > I was not worried about my reputation as a teacher from what
> > Robin wrote, or even really my "reputation" at all. My
> > objection that it misrepresents my POV was not an attempt to
> > elevate it to the level of what another person has attempted
> > to do with my name on the Internet.
> >
> 
> >
> > I don't want friends who read me here to think I write like
> > Robin. That was the extent of me caring about his signing my
> > name.
> 
> Make up your mind, please. Is it purported misrepresentation
> of your POV or of your writing style you're objecting to?
> 
> 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

Cute :-). This should really confirm your status as the eminent activist of the 
IDSD - Ignorance Deception Spectrum Disorder - community.


On Sep 11, 2012, at 2:36 PM, "curtisdeltablues"  
wrote:

> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula  
> wrote:
> >
> > Not to mention how he says below that he wasn't worried about his 
> > reputation after all when he clearly accused Robin of trying to do the very 
> > thing he denies now.
> 
> No troll, there is no contradiction and you need to be very clear about the 
> lines you need to drive in.
> 
> Repeating lies that damage my reputation, is a no.
> 
> Mouthing off in your usual incoherent tourettes ill will, is a 
> who-gives-a-shit.
> 
> > 
> > Too many contradictions piling here and stinking up the place.
> > 
> > 
> > On Sep 11, 2012, at 12:04 PM, "authfriend"  wrote:
> > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
> > >  wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I was not worried about my reputation as a teacher from what
> > > > Robin wrote, or even really my "reputation" at all. My
> > > > objection that it misrepresents my POV was not an attempt to
> > > > elevate it to the level of what another person has attempted
> > > > to do with my name on the Internet.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > >
> > > > I don't want friends who read me here to think I write like
> > > > Robin. That was the extent of me caring about his signing my
> > > > name.
> > > 
> > > Make up your mind, please. Is it purported misrepresentation
> > > of your POV or of your writing style you're objecting to?
> > > 
> > >
> >
> 
> 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count

[Ravi Chivukula]

Don't you start now !!! (wink, wink :-))



On Sep 12, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Emily Reyn  wrote:

> Respect each other's boundaries, now, O.K.?  Practice trying on each other's 
> realities now, O.K.?  Claim your behaviors, now O.K.?  Practice 
> loving-kindness, now O.K?  Be honest, O.K.?  Don't shoot the messenger, now 
> O.K.? (Never mind, you can shoot the messenger.  She'll just have a good cry 
> and proceed ahead with life). This movie title and theme music came to mind.  
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYKCg2aG2FE
> 
> From: curtisdeltablues 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 9:37 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count
> 
>  
> Looks like the omni-subjective Reality ontology has a bit of a sense of humor.
> 
> Hey Robin, perhaps we should take this offline anyway.
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" 
>  wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, FFL PostCount  wrote:
> > >
> > > Fairfield Life Post Counter
> > > ===
> > > Start Date (UTC): Sat Sep 08 00:00:00 2012
> > > End Date (UTC): Sat Sep 15 00:00:00 2012
> > > 403 messages as of (UTC) Wed Sep 12 00:11:51 2012
> > 
> > > 44 Robin Carlsen 
> > 
> > > 4 maskedzebra 
> > 
> > I generally do what I can to warn people when they have a split post count 
> > and they're near their limit, but it doesn't always help. Last night, Robin 
> > was at 48, and he just made 4 more posts. So, he's outta here until the 
> > 21st.
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count

[Ravi Chivukula]

Dear Em,

LOL..on that picture.

Anyway I guess you haven't been keeping up with the dramatic changes that are 
happening here, the definition of a troll has changed my dear Em.

Anyone who gets in the face of the Moses of FFL is a troll, so stop trolling, 
stop being a chatty Cathy, you ain't no Barbie doll dear - wake up.

Love,
Ravi


Thank you,
Ravi

On Sep 12, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Emily Reyn  wrote:

> Tell me Ravi (seriously, actually), what is a troll?  Someone who "trolls" 
> for reactions?  When I was a kid, a troll looked like this:
> 
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/71633812@N08/7978398944/
> 
> 
> From: Ravi Chivukula 
> To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 10:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count
> 
>  
> Don't you start now !!! (wink, wink :-))
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 12, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Emily Reyn  wrote:
> 
>>  
>> Respect each other's boundaries, now, O.K.?  Practice trying on each other's 
>> realities now, O.K.?  Claim your behaviors, now O.K.?  Practice 
>> loving-kindness, now O.K?  Be honest, O.K.?  Don't shoot the messenger, now 
>> O.K.? (Never mind, you can shoot the messenger.  She'll just have a good cry 
>> and proceed ahead with life). This movie title and theme music came to mind. 
>>  
>> 
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYKCg2aG2FE
>> 
>> From: curtisdeltablues 
>> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 9:37 AM
>> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count
>> 
>>  
>> Looks like the omni-subjective Reality ontology has a bit of a sense of 
>> humor.
>> 
>> Hey Robin, perhaps we should take this offline anyway.
>> 
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" 
>>  wrote:
>> >
>> > 
>> > 
>> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, FFL PostCount  wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Fairfield Life Post Counter
>> > > ===
>> > > Start Date (UTC): Sat Sep 08 00:00:00 2012
>> > > End Date (UTC): Sat Sep 15 00:00:00 2012
>> > > 403 messages as of (UTC) Wed Sep 12 00:11:51 2012
>> > 
>> > > 44 Robin Carlsen 
>> > 
>> > > 4 maskedzebra 
>> > 
>> > I generally do what I can to warn people when they have a split post count 
>> > and they're near their limit, but it doesn't always help. Last night, 
>> > Robin was at 48, and he just made 4 more posts. So, he's outta here until 
>> > the 21st.
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 

Re: [FairfieldLife] For Jim - Story about the Tinariwen

[Ravi Chivukula]

Jim Flanegin? I should have his email address - let me know and I can send
it to you privately.

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Emily Reyn wrote:

> **
>
>
>
> If anyone knows how to get a hold of Jim, I read this story last night and
> was reminded that I believe it was he that posted a link here to their
> music a long time back now.  Anyway, it's a lovely story and I thought he
> might enjoy it.  Could someone who knows him forward this?
>
> http://www.thesunmagazine.org/issues/439/blues_for_allah?page=1
>
> Here is a sampling of the Tinariwen:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iorfsFAJJsI&feature=related
>
>  
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Take 2: Eastwooding

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:41 AM, raunchydog  wrote:

> **
>
>
>
>
> > \
> >
> > Curtis: Â Emily may or may not respect me but I know one thing for
> sure.  I am not exempt from her desire to have us entertain her, and she
> is not against stirring the pot when it suits her. I welcomed her wry wit
> even when I was on the receiving end it.  This whole event doesn't change
> my view of her at all.
> >
> > Emily: Â You get another half a point here, Curtis. Â Complements will
> get you everywhere.
> >
> > Curtis: Â And of course your behavior through all this is what I
> expected Judy.
> >
> > Emily: Â Judy has my sincere thanks for taking what I wrote at face
> value, which is how it was intended to be interpreted. Â Now, Curtis,
> clearly your point of view differs on this, but that's O.K. Â I am over
> this and hope never to receive another personal email "supporting you" from
> Sal again. Â Now, I must go finish packing. Â FFL is simply not surreal
> enough for me, and thus I am flying to Las Vegas and then driving out to
> visit the Utah canyon lands. Â I will miss these entertaining exchanges and
> I will work on perfecting my devious, pot-stirring approach so that next
> time I have to devise a grand plan, it won't be so easy for you, Curtis, to
> figure out. Â
> >
> >
>
> Oooo! Snap! Curtis, mess a seasoned pot-stirrer and it always ends badly
> with you falling into the pot...goose cooked with no hope of recovery.
>
> Ha! I just found a Google photo of Emily stirring the pot. No wonder she's
> such an expert. Looks like she's been practicing for a very long time.
>
>
> http://www.pizzamaking.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=11953.0;attach=26189;image
>
>
LOL..OMG..too hilarious :-)

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:05 PM, raunchydog  wrote:

> **
>
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
>  wrote:
> >
> > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
>  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > So Emily and I are cool now. Have fun with whatever this
> > > > thing is that seems to interest you.
> > >
> > > Have fun believing that you and Emily are cool now.
> >
> >
> > I'm pretty sure that if you play the song "Imagine" backwards, it
> generates one of your posts.
> >
> >
>
> You may be cool with Emily, Curtis, but I doubt she's cool with you. After
> calling her motives into question so brutally, do you really think she
> trusts you? Just curious...when Emily played off Robin's irony email did
> you think she was teasing you or did it piss you off? Was your poor
> treatment of her pay back for a bruised ego or did it have nothing to do
> with this:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/319723
>
>  _
>

Well I doubt how many mature, smart, intelligent women would be cool with
this old boy, mid-western clique? Curtis & Barry are clear - either be a
Stupid Sal or "don't you start now.."

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Sep 17, 2012, at 6:03 PM, "authfriend"  wrote:

> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan"  wrote:
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108  wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
> > > >  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"  
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > R: You may be cool with Emily, Curtis, but I doubt she's cool
> > > > > with you. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > M: Does the thought of that excite you? Are you acting as a
> > > > > peacekeeper here Raunchy? Trying to help Emily and I smooth
> > > > > out a misunderstanding maybe? 
> > > > 
> > > > DNFTT
> > > 
> > > Right, it's much more effective to keep smacking Curtis
> > > in the mouth when he gets like this, because his appetite
> > > for deception and cruelty is insatiable once he lets down
> > > the Mr. Wonderful facade.
> > 
> > Are you kidding? What is up, Judy?
> 
> Wish I were kidding. Read the traffic, Susan.
> 
> 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:57 PM, curtisdeltablues <
curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> **
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
>
> Judy:
>
>
> > Right, it's much more effective to keep smacking Curtis
> > in the mouth when he gets like this, because his appetite
> > for deception and cruelty is insatiable once he lets down
> > the Mr. Wonderful facade.
>
> Curtis:
>
> That is disturbing in many ways. There is something profoundly unwell in
> this language, with its violent imagery and disjointed, fantastic claims
> about me. The language in this post negates any need for me to write a
> disclaimer about the author. Read her own words and you will understand
> what I am dealing with here.
>
>
Makes perfect sense to me Curtis baby - totally in line with what I and
many others think there. Take your clueless, shameless, needy, drama
queenery troll elsewhere.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:30 PM, seventhray1  wrote:

> **
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
>
> snip
>
> > You're just mouthing lazy platitudes because you don't
> > follow what goes on here that closely, but you're eager
> > to defend Curtis, and they're handy
>
> The usual punch line, (above) or one variation of it.
>
>
> http://instantrimshot.com/classic/?sound=rimshot
>
>  __
>

Steve baby - STFU you DF. Love - Ravi.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:05 PM, turquoiseb wrote:

> **
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
>  wrote:
>
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
> > >
> > > Right, it's much more effective to keep smacking Curtis
> > > in the mouth when he gets like this, because his appetite
> > > for deception and cruelty is insatiable once he lets down
> > > the Mr. Wonderful facade.
> >
> > That is disturbing in many ways. There is something
> > profoundly unwell in this language, with its violent
> > imagery and disjointed, fantastic claims about me.
>
> It is also disturbing to see how much of the hatred
> she bears for you is based on simple JEALOUSY.
>
> No matter how hard she tries -- and lawdy, lawdy
> how she tries -- she can't get everyone to hate you.
> People still like you, and in fact, think of you
> as a nice person.
>
> NO ONE thinks of her that way.
>
> And she knows this, and knows that the only way she
> can get people to even "be on her side" is through
> the same deception and cruelty she accuses you of.
> Because those are the only tactics that work *for
> her* to get attention, she believes you must be
> using them, too.
>
> It never even *occurs* to her that people think
> you're a nice guy because you're a nice guy. That's
> how far gone into this hatred/jealousy thing she is.
>
>
> > The language in this post negates any need for me to
> > write a disclaimer about the author. Read her own words
> > and you will understand what I am dealing with here.
>
> Even more interesting, since people are talking about
> "what went wrong with Fairfield Life to make it all
> so nasty and contentious," she's been on such a
> hate-fest trying to smear Curtis that she only has
> eight or so more posts left for the week. She'll
> probably piss those away today with insane replies
> to Curtis' calm, measured, unaffected-by-the-crazy-
> person-stalking-him posts, and then she'll have to
> go silent for the rest of the week.
>
> Those who wonder what happened to FFL to make it so
> nasty, *pay attention* during the period when Judy
> can't post. See if it isn't quite a bit nicer then.
>
> Just sayin'...
>

So Judy made Sal threaten Emily and made Curtis act like a clueless,
shameless fool here? Take your emotionally stunted, depraved, deranged,
paranoid, delusional fantasies out of here Barry baby.

You and Curtis are the ones that stink up this joint with your needy,
whiny, drama-queeenery, your deception, manipulation, lying - man what a
bunch of clueless, shameless fools - all you have is the village idiot
Steve and equally idiotic Susan's support - wow what a clique..LOL..

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:21 AM, curtisdeltablues <
curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> **
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
>
> > So Judy made Sal threaten Emily " snip
>
> M: This is instructive in how things spin out of control here. Remember my
> objections to Ann's use of words like "traumatizing" and "vicious attack"
> Raunchy's "brutally" in their imagination of an email they have not seen?
> Egged on by Judy's insinuations of how egregious it was (I disagree)those
> hoping for an excitement buzz escalated what was said to make it all more
> newsworthy.
>
> And now we have the last step. (I hope) Ravi has now turned this
> imagination of the email into an online threat. It is one of his favorite
> troll tactics and he has used it before. Online threats, unlike the usual
> FFL slander machine, are a felony in some states and are a growing concern
> monitored by law enforcement and lawyers concerned about liability. If
> something actually happens after it is claimed that an online threat has
> been made, families sue everyone in sight.
>
> The language we use here matters. Please stop turning your opinion about
> what someone wrote (that you haven't even read) into something more
> exciting by making it sound more sinister. It pushes the bent tack in the
> box toward this kind of claim that is not only not fair to Sal, it is
> really irresponsible considering who posts here.
>
> Ravi, please retract your claim that this email contained something
> threatening. It did not. Not even close. This was wrong for you to put on a
> public board.
>
>
>
Curtis baby - stop this manipulation, stop this twisting, this deception,
the bullying, the rewriting of other's biographies and autobiographies -
this Curtis Reality of Things - you have gone too far Curtis.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

Oh no !

NO - dear Aunt Share - no, this nephew of yours can't do that, no, never,
never, never !!!

Love,
Ravi

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Share Long  wrote:

> **
>
>
> dear Ravi, you can add me to the Curtis Susan Steven clique.  Thank you,
> Share
> PS  I really don't like to be in any clique but in this ongoing conflict
> between the absent Emily and Sal, hope you can see the irony in that, I
> choose to align myself with the clique that is overall being the most
> positive and sensible.
>
>   ------
> *From:* Ravi Chivukula 
> *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 18, 2012 12:58 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going
> to shut up; it's my turn!"
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:05 PM, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> **
>
>  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
>  wrote:
>
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
> > >
> > > Right, it's much more effective to keep smacking Curtis
> > > in the mouth when he gets like this, because his appetite
> > > for deception and cruelty is insatiable once he lets down
> > > the Mr. Wonderful facade.
> >
> > That is disturbing in many ways. There is something
> > profoundly unwell in this language, with its violent
> > imagery and disjointed, fantastic claims about me.
>
> It is also disturbing to see how much of the hatred
> she bears for you is based on simple JEALOUSY.
>
> No matter how hard she tries -- and lawdy, lawdy
> how she tries -- she can't get everyone to hate you.
> People still like you, and in fact, think of you
> as a nice person.
>
> NO ONE thinks of her that way.
>
> And she knows this, and knows that the only way she
> can get people to even "be on her side" is through
> the same deception and cruelty she accuses you of.
> Because those are the only tactics that work *for
> her* to get attention, she believes you must be
> using them, too.
>
> It never even *occurs* to her that people think
> you're a nice guy because you're a nice guy. That's
> how far gone into this hatred/jealousy thing she is.
>
>
> > The language in this post negates any need for me to
> > write a disclaimer about the author. Read her own words
> > and you will understand what I am dealing with here.
>
> Even more interesting, since people are talking about
> "what went wrong with Fairfield Life to make it all
> so nasty and contentious," she's been on such a
> hate-fest trying to smear Curtis that she only has
> eight or so more posts left for the week. She'll
> probably piss those away today with insane replies
> to Curtis' calm, measured, unaffected-by-the-crazy-
> person-stalking-him posts, and then she'll have to
> go silent for the rest of the week.
>
> Those who wonder what happened to FFL to make it so
> nasty, *pay attention* during the period when Judy
> can't post. See if it isn't quite a bit nicer then.
>
> Just sayin'...
>
>
> So Judy made Sal threaten Emily and made Curtis act like a clueless,
> shameless fool here? Take your emotionally stunted, depraved, deranged,
> paranoid, delusional fantasies out of here Barry baby.
>
> You and Curtis are the ones that stink up this joint with your needy,
> whiny, drama-queeenery, your deception, manipulation, lying - man what a
> bunch of clueless, shameless fools - all you have is the village idiot
> Steve and equally idiotic Susan's support - wow what a clique..LOL..
>
>
>
>
>   
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

Curtis baby, Check the dictionary you dumb fuck and then STFU.

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:04 PM, curtisdeltablues <
curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> **
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
>
> > Curtis baby - stop this manipulation, stop this twisting, this
> deception,> the bullying, the rewriting of other's biographies and
> autobiographies -> this Curtis Reality of Things - you have gone too far
> Curtis.
>
> M: OK, I'll give you a chance to be rational and shut me down. Tell us why
> you said this:
>
> "So Judy made Sal threaten Emily "
>
> Why did you use the word "threaten" to describe an email you haven't read?
> How have I twisted what you said into something you didn't mean?
>
> Raunchy is busy trying to spin what you said as not meaning what you said,
> so this really is a great opportunity for you to correct me.
>
>
> >
>
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:21 AM, curtisdeltablues <
> > curtisdeltablues@...> wrote:
> >
> > > **
>
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > So Judy made Sal threaten Emily " snip
> > >
> > > M: This is instructive in how things spin out of control here.
> Remember my
> > > objections to Ann's use of words like "traumatizing" and "vicious
> attack"
> > > Raunchy's "brutally" in their imagination of an email they have not
> seen?
> > > Egged on by Judy's insinuations of how egregious it was (I
> disagree)those
> > > hoping for an excitement buzz escalated what was said to make it all
> more
> > > newsworthy.
> > >
> > > And now we have the last step. (I hope) Ravi has now turned this
> > > imagination of the email into an online threat. It is one of his
> favorite
> > > troll tactics and he has used it before. Online threats, unlike the
> usual
> > > FFL slander machine, are a felony in some states and are a growing
> concern
> > > monitored by law enforcement and lawyers concerned about liability. If
> > > something actually happens after it is claimed that an online threat
> has
> > > been made, families sue everyone in sight.
> > >
> > > The language we use here matters. Please stop turning your opinion
> about
> > > what someone wrote (that you haven't even read) into something more
> > > exciting by making it sound more sinister. It pushes the bent tack in
> the
> > > box toward this kind of claim that is not only not fair to Sal, it is
> > > really irresponsible considering who posts here.
> > >
> > > Ravi, please retract your claim that this email contained something
> > > threatening. It did not. Not even close. This was wrong for you to put
> on a
> > > public board.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > Curtis baby - stop this manipulation, stop this twisting, this deception,
> > the bullying, the rewriting of other's biographies and autobiographies -
> > this Curtis Reality of Things - you have gone too far Curtis.
> >
>
>  
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

Curtis baby - her you go dumb fuck and please now STFU

threat·en *verb* \ˈthre-tən\
*threat·ened**threat·en·ing*
Definition of *THREATEN*
transitive verb
1
*:* to utter threats <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/threats>
 against
2
*a* *:* to give signs or warning of *:*
portend<http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/portend>
 
*b* *:* to hang over dangerously *:*
menace<http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/menace>
 
3
*:* to announce as intended or possible 
4
*:* to cause to feel insecure or anxious 
intransitive verb
1
*:* to utter threats
2
*:* to portend evil
— *threat·en·er*  *noun*
— *threat·en·ing·ly*  *adverb*
 See threaten defined for English-language learners
»<http://www.learnersdictionary.com/search/threaten>
See threaten defined for kids
»<http://www.wordcentral.com/cgi-bin/student?book=Student&va=threaten>
Examples of *THREATEN*

   1. The mugger *threatened* him with a gun.
   2. She *threatened* to quit if they didn't give her a raise, but no one
   believed her.
   3. Civil war has been *threatening* the country for years.
   4. a marriage *threatened* by financial problems
   5. Overfishing *threatens* the survival of certain fish species.
   6. The latest news *threatens* trouble for the economy.


On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Ravi Chivukula wrote:

> Curtis baby, Check the dictionary you dumb fuck and then STFU.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:04 PM, curtisdeltablues <
> curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Curtis baby - stop this manipulation, stop this twisting, this
>> deception,> the bullying, the rewriting of other's biographies and
>> autobiographies -> this Curtis Reality of Things - you have gone too far
>> Curtis.
>>
>> M: OK, I'll give you a chance to be rational and shut me down. Tell us
>> why you said this:
>>
>> "So Judy made Sal threaten Emily "
>>
>> Why did you use the word "threaten" to describe an email you haven't
>> read? How have I twisted what you said into something you didn't mean?
>>
>> Raunchy is busy trying to spin what you said as not meaning what you
>> said, so this really is a great opportunity for you to correct me.
>>
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:21 AM, curtisdeltablues <
>> > curtisdeltablues@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > > **
>>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > So Judy made Sal threaten Emily " snip
>> > >
>> > > M: This is instructive in how things spin out of control here.
>> Remember my
>> > > objections to Ann's use of words like "traumatizing" and "vicious
>> attack"
>> > > Raunchy's "brutally" in their imagination of an email they have not
>> seen?
>> > > Egged on by Judy's insinuations of how egregious it was (I
>> disagree)those
>> > > hoping for an excitement buzz escalated what was said to make it all
>> more
>> > > newsworthy.
>> > >
>> > > And now we have the last step. (I hope) Ravi has now turned this
>> > > imagination of the email into an online threat. It is one of his
>> favorite
>> > > troll tactics and he has used it before. Online threats, unlike the
>> usual
>> > > FFL slander machine, are a felony in some states and are a growing
>> concern
>> > > monitored by law enforcement and lawyers concerned about liability. If
>> > > something actually happens after it is claimed that an online threat
>> has
>> > > been made, families sue everyone in sight.
>> > >
>> > > The language we use here matters. Please stop turning your opinion
>> about
>> > > what someone wrote (that you haven't even read) into something more
>> > > exciting by making it sound more sinister. It pushes the bent tack in
>> the
>> > > box toward this kind of claim that is not only not fair to Sal, it is
>> > > really irresponsible considering who posts here.
>> > >
>> > > Ravi, please retract your claim that this email contained something
>> > > threatening. It did not. Not even close. This was wrong for you to
>> put on a
>> > > public board.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > Curtis baby - stop this manipulation, stop this twisting, this
>> deception,
>> > the bullying, the rewriting of other's biographies and autobiographies -
>> > this Curtis Reality of Things - you have gone too far Curtis.
>> >
>>
>>  
>>
>
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

So Curtis baby, continuing our English lesson  - Emily would be #4 based on
the dictionary meaning of "threaten" = "4 *:* to cause to feel insecure or
anxious ". So Emily was threatened by Sal's email, i.e. made to feel
insecure, made to feel anxious.

OMG..LOL, I can't believe I'm doing this, anyway I have enough posts.

Let's see how you spin this.


On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Ravi Chivukula wrote:

> Curtis baby - her you go dumb fuck and please now STFU
>
> threat·en *verb* \ˈthre-tən\
> *threat·ened**threat·en·ing*
>   Definition of *THREATEN*
> transitive verb
> 1
> *:* to utter threats <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/threats>
>  against
> 2
> *a* *:* to give signs or warning of *:* 
> portend<http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/portend>
>  
> *b* *:* to hang over dangerously *:* 
> menace<http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/menace>
>  
> 3
> *:* to announce as intended or possible  strike>
> 4
> *:* to cause to feel insecure or anxious  brother's success>
> intransitive verb
> 1
> *:* to utter threats
> 2
> *:* to portend evil
> — *threat·en·er*  *noun*
> — *threat·en·ing·ly*  *adverb*
>  See threaten defined for English-language learners 
> »<http://www.learnersdictionary.com/search/threaten>
> See threaten defined for kids 
> »<http://www.wordcentral.com/cgi-bin/student?book=Student&va=threaten>
>  Examples of *THREATEN*
>
>1. The mugger *threatened* him with a gun.
>2. She *threatened* to quit if they didn't give her a raise, but no
>one believed her.
>3. Civil war has been *threatening* the country for years.
>4. a marriage *threatened* by financial problems
>5. Overfishing *threatens* the survival of certain fish species.
>6. The latest news *threatens* trouble for the economy.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
>
>> Curtis baby, Check the dictionary you dumb fuck and then STFU.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:04 PM, curtisdeltablues <
>> curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> **
>>>
>>>
>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Curtis baby - stop this manipulation, stop this twisting, this
>>> deception,> the bullying, the rewriting of other's biographies and
>>> autobiographies -> this Curtis Reality of Things - you have gone too far
>>> Curtis.
>>>
>>> M: OK, I'll give you a chance to be rational and shut me down. Tell us
>>> why you said this:
>>>
>>> "So Judy made Sal threaten Emily "
>>>
>>> Why did you use the word "threaten" to describe an email you haven't
>>> read? How have I twisted what you said into something you didn't mean?
>>>
>>> Raunchy is busy trying to spin what you said as not meaning what you
>>> said, so this really is a great opportunity for you to correct me.
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:21 AM, curtisdeltablues <
>>> > curtisdeltablues@...> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > **
>>>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula
>>> 
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > So Judy made Sal threaten Emily " snip
>>> > >
>>> > > M: This is instructive in how things spin out of control here.
>>> Remember my
>>> > > objections to Ann's use of words like "traumatizing" and "vicious
>>> attack"
>>> > > Raunchy's "brutally" in their imagination of an email they have not
>>> seen?
>>> > > Egged on by Judy's insinuations of how egregious it was (I
>>> disagree)those
>>> > > hoping for an excitement buzz escalated what was said to make it all
>>> more
>>> > > newsworthy.
>>> > >
>>> > > And now we have the last step. (I hope) Ravi has now turned this
>>> > > imagination of the email into an online threat. It is one of his
>>> favorite
>>> > > troll tactics and he has used it before. Online threats, unlike the
>>> usual
>>> > > FFL slander machine, are a felony in some states and are a growing
>>> concern
>>> > > monitored by law enforcement and lawyers concerned about liability.
>>> If
>>> > > something actually happens after it is claimed that an online threat
>>> has
>>> > > been made, families sue everyone in sight.
>>> > >
>>> > > The language we use here matters. Please stop turning your opinion
>>> about
>>> > > what someone wrote (that you haven't even read) into something more
>>> > > exciting by making it sound more sinister. It pushes the bent tack
>>> in the
>>> > > box toward this kind of claim that is not only not fair to Sal, it is
>>> > > really irresponsible considering who posts here.
>>> > >
>>> > > Ravi, please retract your claim that this email contained something
>>> > > threatening. It did not. Not even close. This was wrong for you to
>>> put on a
>>> > > public board.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > Curtis baby - stop this manipulation, stop this twisting, this
>>> deception,
>>> > the bullying, the rewriting of other's biographies and autobiographies
>>> -
>>> > this Curtis Reality of Things - you have gone too far Curtis.
>>> >
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:07 PM, raunchydog  wrote:

> **
>
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
> >
> > So Curtis baby, continuing our English lesson - Emily would be #4 based
> on
> > the dictionary meaning of "threaten" = "4 *:* to cause to feel insecure
> or
>
> > anxious ". So Emily was threatened by Sal's email, i.e. made to feel
> > insecure, made to feel anxious.
> >
> > OMG..LOL, I can't believe I'm doing this, anyway I have enough posts.
> >
> > Let's see how you spin this.
> >
>
> O.K. Ravi, if you want dance to Curtis' tune and split some hairs on
> definitions, fine. Just know that doing so, you're unnecessarily buying
> into how he frames this issue rather than recognizing that in fact you
> posed a question that Curtis snipped to deceptively imply that you claimed
> Sal sent a threatening email to Emily. Oh, well, carry on, dear heart. I
> said my piece.
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/320445
>
>
Yes dear Raunchy I did read your other posts - thanks for your
clarification, it was indeed a rhetorical question of mine to address their
hypocrisy. But I just wanted to make sure he realizes that even
this sleight of hand leads to a dead end.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:37 PM, curtisdeltablues <
curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> **
>
>
> I appreciate your taking a swing at it. I don't think much "spinning" is
> necessary. You gave the project so little thought. Any thoughtful person
> would understand what went down here. And it probably wasn't that you did
> some research beforehand to pick the 4th use of the term,and then used it
> improperly according to the dictionary, but properly for the first few
> definitions deliberately.
>
> You've just turned in sloppy work because of your over confidence and
> contempt for me.
>

Curtis - it was a rhetorical question of mine to point to the deception,
manipulation, bullying you engage in here. Even if it meant literally I
would be nuts to think Sal would have meant any physical harm to Emily - so
no sloppy work here Curtis, contempt on my part - yes, your usual sleight
of hand - yes, your usual twisting, manipulating context  - yes, your seven
layered progressively cruder,baser,grosser deception - yes.

>
> At least now I can go back to Raunchy's spin with some more insight into
> your thinking process.
>
> That later post about her spin was a classic.
>
> I'll bet you never got away stealing any curds and ghee, did you baby
> Krishna?
>

LOL..OK this is seriously funny. Oh no I am very deceptive, but unlike you
it's not to maintain my self-deception.

Anyway what a shame - a talented man like you has to resort to all this
drama !!!

Looks like you need some love and attention - so XOXOXOXOXO - love ya baby.

Ravi

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Ravi Chivukula wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:37 PM, curtisdeltablues <
> curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> I appreciate your taking a swing at it. I don't think much "spinning" is
>> necessary. You gave the project so little thought. Any thoughtful person
>> would understand what went down here. And it probably wasn't that you did
>> some research beforehand to pick the 4th use of the term,and then used it
>> improperly according to the dictionary, but properly for the first few
>> definitions deliberately.
>>
>> You've just turned in sloppy work because of your over confidence and
>> contempt for me.
>>
>
> Curtis - it was a rhetorical question of mine to point to the deception,
> manipulation, bullying you engage in here. Even if it meant literally I
> would be nuts to think Sal would have meant any physical harm to Emily - so
> no sloppy work here Curtis, contempt on my part - yes, your usual sleight
> of hand - yes, your usual twisting, manipulating context  - yes, your seven
> layered progressively cruder,baser,grosser deception - yes.
>
>>
>> At least now I can go back to Raunchy's spin with some more insight into
>> your thinking process.
>>
>> That later post about her spin was a classic.
>>
>> I'll bet you never got away stealing any curds and ghee, did you baby
>> Krishna?
>>
>
> LOL..OK this is seriously funny. Oh no I am very deceptive, but unlike you
> it's not to maintain my self-deception.
>
> Anyway what a shame - a talented man like you has to resort to all this
> drama !!!
>
> Looks like you need some love and attention - so XOXOXOXOXO - love ya baby.
>
> Ravi
>
>
You reference to baby Krishna completely dissipated my anger but trust me
Curtis baby I will keep coming after you. Even the Raakshasas temporarily
won my divine Mother's favor by doing something similar, so no I will keep
after you Curtis - my metaphorical Raakshasa of deception, my favorite, the
7 layered one. So I will - my mind now is too distracted reminiscing on my
beloved and so I'm  not able to post much.

>
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:19 PM, curtisdeltablues <
curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> **
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
>
> I really believe that you shouldn't have said that about Sal's post and I
> don't find your explanations convincing. The false comparative about
> physical harm doesn't fly either. The term "threat"is an inflammatory word
> and you chose if for that reason. But I read it and it was not a
> threatening email. It was much like so much of what goes on here every day.
>
> But if you want to goof on me for drama queening the whole thing up too
> far, I can live with that. Perhaps I did get a bit carried away.
>


Goofing up, getting a bit carried away doesn't cut it Curtis.

Oh no - sleight of hand again Curtis, the term I used was threaten and not
threat, there's lot of difference - and threaten is not an inflammatory
word, did you not read the various meanings of the word "threaten"? You are
completely clueless to your behavior - how you manipulate, twist context,
facts to bully, avoid answering real questions and cry wolf. Curtis Reality
of Things as my old man called it and 7 layered deception, progressively
baser, cruder, grosser as I call it.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Robert  wrote:

> **
>
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Ravi Chivukula  ...>wrote:
>
> > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:37 PM, curtisdeltablues <
> > > curtisdeltablues@...> wrote
>
> > >> I appreciate your taking a swing at it. I don't think much "spinning"
> is
> > >> necessary. You gave the project so little thought. Any thoughtful
> person
> > >> would understand what went down here. And it probably wasn't that you
> did
> > >> some research beforehand to pick the 4th use of the term,and then
> used it
> > >> improperly according to the dictionary, but properly for the first few
> > >> definitions deliberately.
> > >>
> > >> You've just turned in sloppy work because of your over confidence and
> > >> contempt for me.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Curtis - it was a rhetorical question of mine to point to the
> deception,
> > > manipulation, bullying you engage in here. Even if it meant literally I
> > > would be nuts to think Sal would have meant any physical harm to Emily
> - so
> > > no sloppy work here Curtis, contempt on my part - yes, your usual
> sleight
> > > of hand - yes, your usual twisting, manipulating context - yes, your
> seven
> > > layered progressively cruder,baser,grosser deception - yes.
> > >
> > >>
> > >> At least now I can go back to Raunchy's spin with some more insight
> into
> > >> your thinking process.
> > >>
> > >> That later post about her spin was a classic.
> > >>
> > >> I'll bet you never got away stealing any curds and ghee, did you baby
> > >> Krishna?
> > >>
> > >
> > > LOL..OK this is seriously funny. Oh no I am very deceptive, but unlike
> you
> > > it's not to maintain my self-deception.
> > >
> > > Anyway what a shame - a talented man like you has to resort to all this
> > > drama !!!
> > >
> > > Looks like you need some love and attention - so XOXOXOXOXO - love ya
> baby.
> > >
> > > Ravi
> > >
> > >
> > You reference to baby Krishna completely dissipated my anger but trust me
> > Curtis baby I will keep coming after you. Even the Raakshasas temporarily
> > won my divine Mother's favor by doing something similar, so no I will
> keep
> > after you Curtis - my metaphorical Raakshasa of deception, my favorite,
> the
> > 7 layered one. So I will - my mind now is too distracted reminiscing on
> my
> > beloved and so I'm not able to post much.
> >
> While you are reminiscing on your beloved, be sure to take a break from
> hateing...that will help you begin to open your closed heart again, and get
> out of your head...
> Feeding your anger with more anger is not the way, my friend...
> And it will never be the way back to your Beloved...
>
> So, take a break; a pepsi break,my good freind...
> Read in the Bagavad Gita as Krishna says to Arjuna, 'Know Anger to be the
> Enemy here on Earth; and the need to over come our anger and hatred toward
> each other...so we may 'See' clearly, my great warriour one...
>
> R.
>
>
Babaji - Thank you so much for your concern - Anger, hate is just on the
surface, something to playfully indulge in. I'm forever on a break, always
relaxed - don't drink Pepsi though - Coffee & a Smoke..singing to my
beloved.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

No Curtis baby - you have totally disarmed me with that baby Krishna comment. 
It will take me several days to recover if at all.

Now I think you and Barry are two of the most sweetest, gentlest, kindest, 
naughtiest, playful people in the world. You are the baby Krishnas of FFL - 
sure the women may be abused as ugly, vindictive cunts too stupid to live but 
trust me you guys invoke nothing but maternal love in the Judys, Raunchys, Anns 
as their hearts are warmed, gladdened by your tiny fingerprints, handprints on 
their pots of curds and ghee, footprints that lead to the swings and slides. 
Their whole day is a breeze, reminscing your sweet memories as they exchange 
your heartwarming, playful, naughty abuses and insults.

Love,
Ravi

On Sep 19, 2012, at 7:14 AM, "curtisdeltablues"  
wrote:

> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula  
> wrote:
> 
> R:> Goofing up,
> 
> M: I didn't say that, I meant what I said about your use of words.
> 
> R: getting a bit carried away doesn't cut it Curtis.
> 
> M: Well that is as far as I was willing to go, however after reading this I 
> am not so sure.
> 
> > 
> R: > Oh no - sleight of hand again Curtis, the term I used was threaten and 
> not> threat, there's lot of difference - and threaten is not an inflammatory> 
> word, did you not read the various meanings of the word "threaten"? 
> 
> M: This is probably not your best route with me Ravi. I have a home court 
> English as a first language advantage here and I'm not buying your 
> explanation, sorry.
> 
> R: You are
> > completely clueless to your behavior - how you manipulate, twist context,> 
> > facts
> 
> M: Examples would help more than vague assertions on parade. You may not have 
> a good grasp on what the word "fact" refers to.
> 
> R: to bully,
> 
> M: I have not power differential with anyone here that would allow this. 
> Bulling is a serious charge and I don't take it lightly. I don't have any 
> power over you Ravi, we are just talking here.
> 
> R: avoid answering real questions>
> 
> M: Which questions exactly? Your rhetorical ones? Give some examples.
> 
> R: and cry wolf.>
> 
> M: Here we will have to agree to disagree. I have real issues with your 
> behavior here. 
> 
> R: Curtis Reality
> > of Things as my old man called it and 7 layered deception, progressively> 
> > baser, cruder, grosser as I call it.
> 
> M: Are you trying to sound like one of those mystic yogi guys cuz I've kinda 
> been there and done that. If you are trying to communicate more than 
> gibberish, try defining the 7 levels of deception for us. 
> 
> Oh one more thing. Sal never threatened or made a threat to Emily in that 
> email. I don't want you to miss that point in all the fun we are having with 
> the yogi word salad talk. 
> 
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:19 PM, curtisdeltablues <
> > curtisdeltablues@...> wrote:
> > 
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > I really believe that you shouldn't have said that about Sal's post and I
> > > don't find your explanations convincing. The false comparative about
> > > physical harm doesn't fly either. The term "threat"is an inflammatory word
> > > and you chose if for that reason. But I read it and it was not a
> > > threatening email. It was much like so much of what goes on here every 
> > > day.
> > >
> > > But if you want to goof on me for drama queening the whole thing up too
> > > far, I can live with that. Perhaps I did get a bit carried away.
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > Goofing up, getting a bit carried away doesn't cut it Curtis.
> > 
> > Oh no - sleight of hand again Curtis, the term I used was threaten and not
> > threat, there's lot of difference - and threaten is not an inflammatory
> > word, did you not read the various meanings of the word "threaten"? You are
> > completely clueless to your behavior - how you manipulate, twist context,
> > facts to bully, avoid answering real questions and cry wolf. Curtis Reality
> > of Things as my old man called it and 7 layered deception, progressively
> > baser, cruder, grosser as I call it.
> >
> 
> 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 6:41 AM, raunchydog  wrote:

> **
>
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Robert  wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Ravi Chivukula  > > ...>wrote:
> > >
> > > So, take a break; a pepsi break,my good freind...
> > > Read in the Bagavad Gita as Krishna says to Arjuna, 'Know Anger to be
> the
> > > Enemy here on Earth; and the need to over come our anger and hatred
> toward
> > > each other...so we may 'See' clearly, my great warriour one...
> > >
> > > R.
> > >
> > >
> > Babaji - Thank you so much for your concern - Anger, hate is just on the
> > surface, something to playfully indulge in. I'm forever on a break,
> always
> > relaxed - don't drink Pepsi though - Coffee & a Smoke..singing to my
> > beloved.
> >
>
> http://youtu.be/pPxyTFwOW0Y
>
>
Thanks dear Raunchy - I enjoyed the longer version too ::-) -
http://youtu.be/49tTzEifY6M


>  
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: PS to Ann "I'm not going to shut up; it's my turn!"

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Sep 19, 2012, at 11:37 AM, "Richard J. Williams"  
wrote:

> 
> 
> Ravi Chivukula:
> > ...footprints that lead to the swings and slides.
> >
> Now they're 'swinging and sliding' down the rabbit 
> hole. LoL!
> 

So it's all about swinging and sliding down rabbit holes. Go figure! LoL!

> 
> > No Curtis baby - you have totally disarmed me with 
> > that baby Krishna comment. It will take me several 
> > days to recover if at all.
> > 
> 
> 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Perfect gig for Judy Stein -- writing for the Church of $cientology

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:04 PM, raunchydog  wrote:

> **
>
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater  wrote:
> >
> > At the risk of 'piling on' this little vignette was priceless. Probably
> because it rang so true. All you left out was some bimbo trying to climb
> onto his lap.
> >
>
> Hold the applause, Ann. You're only encouraging me. I can't...no I
> mustn't...Help! Somebody STOP ME! Oh alright.
>
> Scene: Leiden, Holland, 2:00 am. Two Dutch grifters discuss their recent
> mark.
> Guy: Hey, what's in his wallet?
> Gal: ID, Barry Wright, two bucks and a condom...expiration date, August
> 18, 1969.
> Guy: Sonofabitch, the last time that old geezer got laid was at Woodstock!
> Gal: Thought so...probably explains the tie-dyed boxer shorts.
> Guy: Did you get those too?
> Gal: Yep, trophy for my easy mark collection.
> Guy: Two bucks? Hardly worth the trouble of letting him feel your ass.
> Gal: My ass, his shorts, win, win.
>
> Meanwhile, alone in a fleabag hotel, passed out cold, handcuffed to a
> chair and stripped naked except for a Jerry Garcia tie* gracefully covering
> his privates. Barry slowly regains consciousness, muttering, "win,
> win...win, win."
>
> Barry: What a night! Can't wait to write about it.
>
> *Jerry Garcia tie: Barry's most prized possession.
>
>
Sorry raunchy, this would have been real funny if it weren't real. Thanks
for trying.



> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"  wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Barry: I've got a problem.
> > > Bartender: Yeah. Tell me about it.
> > > Barry: There's this woman...
> > > Bartender (aside): Here he goes again...another sob story about some
> crazy bitch named Judy. Man, this dame really gets to him.
> > > Barry: This woman is diving me crazy...haunting my every waking
> moment. Gimme another drink.
> > > Bartender: I hear you, Buddy. (aside) Yep. We know where this one's
> going.
> > > Barry: She has this creepy power over people who actually read her
> posts on FFLife.
> > > Bartender: (pretending interest) Uh-huh...
> > > Barry: THOSE PEOPLE...who read her posts. Do you know what happens to
> them?
> > > Bartender: Have another shot with your beer, Buddy. You're gunna need
> it.
> > > Barry: She makes THOSE PEOPLE hate me...Oh the agony, the unbearable
> pain...etc, etc, etc. blubber, blubber, boo hoo hoo.
> > >
> > > Two hours later..
> > >
> > > Bartender: Time to go home, Buddy.
> > > Barry: My hair! What happened to my hair? I have no hair!
> > > Bartender: It caught on fire...spontaneous combustion. You should have
> seen it. You were spectacular! Never saw anything like it. Blue flames
> shooting out yer ass, hair on fire...quite a show, quite a show, indeed.
> The joint was packed.
> > > Barry: I need a drink.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
>  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" 
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > You'll have to learn by experience what the positive-to-
> > > > > > negative ratios of FFL participants are. With some of
> > > > > > them, you may never see their negative side until you
> > > > > > get into a dispute with them.
> > > >
> > > > Note the incredibly clueless assumption here -- that
> > > > "getting into a dispute with them" is something that
> > > > is going to -- or "should" -- happen. It doesn't, for
> > > > most here. It *does*, for those who live for disputes.
> > > >
> > > > The same assumption -- nigh unto a presumption -- was
> > > > voiced recently in response to my suggestion that the
> > > > screaming of "Non-sequitur!" was a barrier to conver-
> > > > sation. The person replying didn't even *address* the
> > > > possibility that FFL could be *about* conversation.
> > > > Instead, it was presumed to be a forum for "debate."
> > > >
> > > > Some people, as strange as it may seem, *don't* live
> > > > for debate, or view every occasion to interact with
> > > > other human beings as an opportunity to start one.
> > > > These people instead -- not being as ego-attached to
> > > > their POVs and rigid, fixed ideas -- enjoy discussing
> > > > them calmly with others, in more of a (dare I say it)
> > > > conversation. These strange people don't feel the same
> > > > compulsive need to *assert* their own POVs and ideas
> > > > and declare them "better" or "more right" than those
> > > > of others, and thus don't feel the same compulsive
> > > > need to turn every conversation about POVs and ideas
> > > > into a "debate." Just sayin'...
> > > >
> > > > > > Those with a penchant for
> > > > > > dishonesty are so clever about giving the false
> > > > > > impression that the other side is at fault that a third
> > > > > > party reading the posts in the dispute is unable to see
> > > > > > how they've done it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Rght. Only Judy can. It is kind of like a magical
> > > >

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Perfect gig for Judy Stein -- writing for the Church of $cientology

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Sep 20, 2012, at 1:03 PM, "seventhray1"  
wrote:

> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula  
> wrote:
> 
> > Sorry raunchy, this would have been real funny if it weren't real. Thanks
> > for trying.
> 
> 
> Poor Ravi.  He's gotten so twisted that he can't appreciate real humor.  
> 
> I guess if it doesn't contain a heaping dose of abusive language, it doesn't 
> make an impression on him.
> 
> Oh, well.
> 
> Raunch,  
> 
> I thought it was pretty funny.  

LOL..now this is hilarious, ha ha - Steve you made my day. Raunchy should learn 
from you, I'm with Barry on this one..LOL.

> 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Perfect gig for Judy Stein -- writing for the Church of $cientology

[Ravi Chivukula]

Auntie Share - the legend of St. Judy Durga, the embodiment of honest and 
integrity is well known around here. FYI - we usually don't mess with her 
unless we are suffering from IDSD - Ignorance Deception Spectrum Disorder. She 
will wear us down, because for her truth is not a game of probability, there's 
no 70-80% truth for her, she doesn't buy that, either it's the truth or not, 
doesn't negotiate truth, integrity for the sake of niceness, politeness, 
doesn't shy away from any discomfort, pain, anxiety, fear caused by taking 
strong moral stands. A tough love secular saint, some say. Even you brave, 
intrepid nephew Ladislaw is wary of this woman.

Love,
Ravi



On Sep 20, 2012, at 12:31 PM, Share Long  wrote:

> Judy, your practice of replying sentence by sentence distorts the meaning of 
> my words and overshadows the import of my complete thought as contained in 
> the whole paragraph.  For example, what I said about the death wish phrase.  
> 
> From your overall relentlessly combative tone, I think this aim of 
> distorting, rather than arriving at truth or harmony, is your purpose.  More 
> directly, I did not put Barry in the positive and sensible clique as you 
> accuse me of below.  OTOH, when I recall the straightforward tone of Barry 
> calling me an idiot, I'm more likely to put him there rather than you with, 
> what one friend of mine calls, your toxic and obfuscating nitpicking.  And 
> I'm sure Barry's happy not to be put in any clique! 
> 
> Perhaps I've been guilty of considered and considerate niceness, what you 
> call synthetic, in the service of not hurting people's feelings and speaking 
> the truth that is sweet.  But you're guilty of synthetic truth seeking.  In 
> service to putting others down and attempting to win every argument.
> From: authfriend 
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 11:35 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Perfect gig for Judy Stein -- writing for the 
> Church of $cientology
> 
>  
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> >
> > Yes, Judy I see what you mean.  In this instance I'd say
> > you're sounding more reasonable than Curtis.
> 
> Oh, but that isn't what I asked, is it? I asked if you
> could see the attempted deceptions in Curtis's comments
> on my earlier post to you.
> 
> The attempts to deceive are very clear-cut and objective:
> I said one thing, and he pretended I had said something
> different. You should be able to see that and to
> acknowledge it.
> 
> Take another look, please. I left it all in below.
> 
> > BUT...did you see his reply to Ravi in which he admits that
> > he overreacted?
> 
> Yes, I didn't find it terribly impressive. He didn't
> retract any of his accusations (false, IMHO) against
> Ravi, and in any case in his next post to Ravi he said
> he was "not so sure" that he'd overreacted after all.
> 
> > That's something I very much admire.  When a person can say
> > that maybe they got it wrong that time.  Or maybe they 
> > overreacted.  Or maybe they weren't thinking clearly, or
> > maybe having a bad day.  Something along those lines.  So
> > for me, Curtis gets big points for that.
> 
> It needs to be balanced against everything else he's said
> to and about Ravi and the other participants in this
> dispute, including Emily. It's barely a drop in the bucket
> of the retractions and apologies he still owes.
> 
> > And I'm glad that you're feeling better.
> 
> Now, why would you say that, Share, when I never said
> I was feeling anything less than fine?
> 
> You know, I have a lot more respect for people who come
> right out and say what they mean, even if it's hostile,
> than for those who try to disguise it, as you just did
> with that comment.
> 
> Or perhaps you're just having a bad day.
> 
> I'll take honesty and reality, even if they're ugly,
> over synthetic niceness any time.
> 
> > Which is how you sound to me in this post.
> 
> Seems like your intuition may need a tune-up.
> 
> Or just your common sense, maybe. I addressed you in a
> more cordial tone in the post you're responding to not
> because I hadn't been feeling well previously, but
> because you had said something important and intelligent
> that I agreed with, about DSM-IV labels (V will come out
> next May) not being helpful to nonprofessionals (although 
> Richard's "SCHIZO" wasn't a DSM label, but a crude insult
> to go with the rest of his faux history of Barry--and no,
> the link he posted to an old discussion doesn't help his
> own credibility, just FYI).
> 
> > Hey I just remembered.  You have 49 posts so you're
> > welcome to answer this to me directly if you want.
> 
> Uhhh, thanks, but no thanks. If I had wanted to
> communicate with you privately, I would have done that
> from the start.
> 
> > Anyway, I agree with you that different people are a different
> > percentage of positive and negative. I find most people to be 
> > mostly positive. Say 70-90%.
> 
> It doesn't surprise me th

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Perfect gig for Judy Stein -- writing for the Church of $cientology

[Ravi Chivukula]

Any time dear Share.

Love,
Ravi.


On Sep 20, 2012, at 4:24 PM, Share Long  wrote:

> Dear Ravi,  Thank you so much for this, for not taking sides, for good 
> intentions, for trying to bridge a gap as it were.  I can feel your kindness 
> towards me in your words and it touches my heart.  And I must admit I wish 
> you could be as kind to everyone on FFL.  I guess you're a mix like we all 
> are.  It's all right.  We're all human here and doing the best we can.
> Share  
> 
> From: Ravi Chivukula 
> To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 5:08 PM
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Perfect gig for Judy Stein -- writing for 
> the Church of $cientology
> 
>  
> Auntie Share - the legend of St. Judy Durga, the embodiment of honest and 
> integrity is well known around here. FYI - we usually don't mess with her 
> unless we are suffering from IDSD - Ignorance Deception Spectrum Disorder. 
> She will wear us down, because for her truth is not a game of probability, 
> there's no 70-80% truth for her, she doesn't buy that, either it's the truth 
> or not, doesn't negotiate truth, integrity for the sake of niceness, 
> politeness, doesn't shy away from any discomfort, pain, anxiety, fear caused 
> by taking strong moral stands. A tough love secular saint, some say. Even you 
> brave, intrepid nephew Ladislaw is wary of this woman.
> 
> Love,
> Ravi
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 20, 2012, at 12:31 PM, Share Long  wrote:
> 
>>  
>> Judy, your practice of replying sentence by sentence distorts the meaning of 
>> my words and overshadows the import of my complete thought as contained in 
>> the whole paragraph.  For example, what I said about the death wish phrase.  
>> 
>> From your overall relentlessly combative tone, I think this aim of 
>> distorting, rather than arriving at truth or harmony, is your purpose.  More 
>> directly, I did not put Barry in the positive and sensible clique as you 
>> accuse me of below.  OTOH, when I recall the straightforward tone of Barry 
>> calling me an idiot, I'm more likely to put him there rather than you with, 
>> what one friend of mine calls, your toxic and obfuscating nitpicking.  And 
>> I'm sure Barry's happy not to be put in any clique! 
>> 
>> Perhaps I've been guilty of considered and considerate niceness, what you 
>> call synthetic, in the service of not hurting people's feelings and speaking 
>> the truth that is sweet.  But you're guilty of synthetic truth seeking.  In 
>> service to putting others down and attempting to win every argument.
>> From: authfriend 
>> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 11:35 AM
>> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Perfect gig for Judy Stein -- writing for the 
>> Church of $cientology
>> 
>>  
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>> >
>> > Yes, Judy I see what you mean.  In this instance I'd say
>> > you're sounding more reasonable than Curtis.
>> 
>> Oh, but that isn't what I asked, is it? I asked if you
>> could see the attempted deceptions in Curtis's comments
>> on my earlier post to you.
>> 
>> The attempts to deceive are very clear-cut and objective:
>> I said one thing, and he pretended I had said something
>> different. You should be able to see that and to
>> acknowledge it.
>> 
>> Take another look, please. I left it all in below.
>> 
>> > BUT...did you see his reply to Ravi in which he admits that
>> > he overreacted?
>> 
>> Yes, I didn't find it terribly impressive. He didn't
>> retract any of his accusations (false, IMHO) against
>> Ravi, and in any case in his next post to Ravi he said
>> he was "not so sure" that he'd overreacted after all.
>> 
>> > That's something I very much admire.  When a person can say
>> > that maybe they got it wrong that time.  Or maybe they 
>> > overreacted.  Or maybe they weren't thinking clearly, or
>> > maybe having a bad day.  Something along those lines.  So
>> > for me, Curtis gets big points for that.
>> 
>> It needs to be balanced against everything else he's said
>> to and about Ravi and the other participants in this
>> dispute, including Emily. It's barely a drop in the bucket
>> of the retractions and apologies he still owes.
>> 
>> > And I'm glad that you're feeling better.
>> 
>> Now, why would you say that, Share, when I never said
>> 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Open Mike Thread (was Re: Perfect gig for Judy Stein)

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Sep 20, 2012, at 3:52 PM, doctordumb...@rocketmail.com 
 wrote:

> Doctor Dumbass says, 
> 
> > > >
> > > > Hold the applause, Ann. You're only encouraging me. I can't...
> > > > no I mustn't...Help! Somebody STOP ME! Oh alright.
> > > >
> > > > Scene: Leiden, Holland, 2:00 am. Two Dutch grifters discuss
> > > > their recent mark.
> > > > Guy: Hey, what's in his wallet?
> > > > Gal: ID, Barry Wright, two bucks and a condom...expiration
> > > > date, August 18, 1969.
> > > > Guy: Sonofabitch, the last time that old geezer got laid was
> > > > at Woodstock!
> > > > Gal: Thought so...probably explains the tie-dyed boxer shorts.
> > > > Guy: Did you get those too?
> > > > Gal: Yep, trophy for my easy mark collection.
> > > > Guy: Two bucks? Hardly worth the trouble of letting him feel
> > > > your ass.
> > > > Gal: My ass, his shorts, win, win.
> > > >
> > > > Meanwhile, alone in a fleabag hotel, passed out cold, handcuffed
> > > > to a chair and stripped naked except for a Jerry Garcia tie*
> > > > gracefully covering his privates. Barry slowly regains
> > > > consciousness, muttering, "win, win...win, win."
> > > >
> > > > Barry: What a night! Can't wait to write about it.
> > > >
> > > > *Jerry Garcia tie: Barry's most prized possession.
> > >
> >
> Later:
> 
> Crunching aspirin, Barry moves towards the mini-fridge, slipping, suddenly 
> sprawling like an off balance penguin onto the floor, he gets up again, this 
> time successfully lurching into the kitchenette, yanking the fridge door 
> open, groping for a final beer from last night – cranks it open, chugs about 
> half – uUURP! ...better...
> 
> BZZZT!
> 
> Barry: Fuck...the door...
> 
> He shambles over to the door, opens it partway, looks at his visitor in the 
> hallway, his stomach lurches violently, the room begins to spin, he loses 
> bladder control, warm pee running down his naked leg – 
> 
> Barry: WTF?!?!?!
> 
> Judy, standing outside, with shades on: I want my cuffs back, dipshit – Let 
> me in, or I'm coming in...and I've got back up...
> 
> 

OMG - this is hilarious Doctor Dumbass !!! So this message makes me think  
there may be something to the rumor that you may be Jim in disguise :-)

Re: [FairfieldLife] Open Mike Thread (was Re: Perfect gig for Judy Stein)

[Ravi Chivukula]

On Sep 20, 2012, at 6:14 PM, "raunchydog"  wrote:

> 
> > > >
> > > Later:
> > > 
> > > Crunching aspirin, Barry moves towards the mini-fridge, slipping, 
> > > suddenly sprawling like an off balance penguin onto the floor, he gets up 
> > > again, this time successfully lurching into the kitchenette, yanking the 
> > > fridge door open, groping for a final beer from last night – cranks it 
> > > open, chugs about half – uUURP! ...better...
> > > 
> > > BZZZT!
> > > 
> > > Barry: Fuck...the door...
> > > 
> > > He shambles over to the door, opens it partway, looks at his visitor in 
> > > the hallway, his stomach lurches violently, the room begins to spin, he 
> > > loses bladder control, warm pee running down his naked leg – 
> > > 
> > > Barry: WTF?!?!?!
> > > 
> > > Judy, standing outside, with shades on: I want my cuffs back, dipshit – 
> > > Let me in, or I'm coming in...and I've got back up...
> > 
> 
> Barry: Backup? You mean you and the pips? LOL
> Judy: Don't laugh Barry, you're in serious trouble.
> Barry: Oh I'm so scared...uhh-oh...
> 
> The hair on the back of Barry's neck stands on end as Judy summons her Ducati 
> 996 motorcycle by remote...vroom, vroom, vroom and then obediently parks 
> itself next to her. 
> 
> Judy: Hop on Barry, we're going for a ride. 
> 
> http://youtu.be/sEL7PTwGB5s
> 
> Barry: I shit my pants.
> Judy: Cuffs now, dipshit.
> 
> Judy nods to the driver and bikini clad meter maids jump Barry's bones. 
> 

Man these "Get Barry" fests and "Get Barry" orgies are always so much fun 
!!!,___