--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
wrote:
Bingo.
Sal
On Apr 18, 2006, at 1:30 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
That is possible. There are a *lot* of people who are
afraid of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
salsunshine@
wrote:
Bingo.
Sal
On Apr 18, 2006, at 1:30 AM, TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What MMY and the TMO holds up as a guide to the ideal form of
administration is The Ramayana, which recounts how Lord Rama
ruled at Ayodha for ~11,000 years some two million years ago.
In other words, a fairytale.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
wrote:
And they all lived happily ever after.
yeah-- very difficult to promote ideals during kali yuga
because it is so hard to sustain them. we
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
What MMY and the TMO holds up as a guide to the ideal form of
administration is The Ramayana, which recounts how Lord Rama
ruled at Ayodha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
What MMY and the TMO holds up as a guide to the ideal form of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
What MMY and the TMO holds up as a guide to the ideal form of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
salsunshine@
wrote:
And they all lived happily ever after.
yeah-- very difficult to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
salsunshine@
wrote:
Bingo.
Sal
On Apr 18, 2006, at 1:30 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
That is possible. There are a *lot* of people who are
afraid of taking responsibility for their own lives,
and who are hoping desperately for Santa Claus to come
along and rule them and tell them what to do all the
time so they
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
snip
This is not just Hindu-bashing, BTW. I feel the same
way about people
on 4/18/06 1:20 AM, bob_brigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
What MMY and the TMO holds up as a guide to the ideal form of
administration is The
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
wrote:
And they all lived happily ever after.
yeah-- very difficult to
on 4/18/06 10:12 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't find anywhere that Bob suggested there was a
modern-day, real-world example of an ideal society.
Seems to me he was talking about (a) why someone might
have confidence in the Vedic account of a Sat-Yuga
golden age, and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
snip
People have embraced democracy because good people are
not available to be rulers...
People have embraced democracy because it's a good
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
snip
People have embraced democracy because good people are
not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 4/18/06 10:12 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't find anywhere that Bob suggested there was a
modern-day, real-world example of an ideal society.
Seems to me he was talking about (a) why
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Even those forms of governance we know about that
grant people the greatest measure of responsibility
nevertheless restrict that responsibility in some
areas. As Bob points out, democracy can result in
a tyranny
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
salsunshine@
wrote:
And they all lived happily ever after.
yeah-- very difficult to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Bingo.
Sal
On Apr 18, 2006, at 1:30 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
That is possible. There are a *lot* of people who are
afraid of taking responsibility for their own lives,
and who are hoping desperately for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 4/18/06 10:12 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't find anywhere that Bob suggested there was a
modern-day, real-world example of an ideal society.
Seems to me he was talking about (a) why
On Apr 18, 2006, at 5:36 PM, bob_brigante wrote:
The pundits in the Brahmastan of India are purifying the atmosphere
there so that Vedic culture can be restored to India -- when that
happens, there will be an ideal society serving as a lighthouse to
the world.
So you've seen pictures of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 4/18/06 1:20 AM, bob_brigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
What MMY
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 4/18/06 10:12 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't find anywhere that Bob suggested there was a
modern-day, real-world example of an ideal society.
Seems to me he was talking about (a) why
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
salsunshine@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
wrote:
Bingo.
Sal
On Apr 18, 2006, at 1:30 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
That is possible. There are a *lot* of people who are
afraid
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 4/17/06 1:27 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I stand by my original point -- ANYONE who can justify
*forcing* people to follow his or her spiritual beliefs,
for *ANY* reason, has crossed a boundary
On Apr 17, 2006, at 11:02 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
But imagine that the person being forced to learn
and practice it is yourself, and that the technique
that has gained politically-correct favor enough to
be made mandatory is Scientology. Or Subud. Or for
those who are, in true TM fashion,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 4/17/06 1:27 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I stand by my original point -- ANYONE who can justify
*forcing* people to follow his or her spiritual beliefs,
for *ANY* reason, has crossed a boundary
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 4/17/06 1:27 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I stand by my original point -- ANYONE who can justify
*forcing* people to follow his or her spiritual beliefs,
for *ANY* reason, has crossed a boundary
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
on 4/17/06 1:27 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I stand by my original point -- ANYONE who can justify
*forcing* people to
on 4/17/06 11:55 AM, anonyff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the giant Vedic Science course in the Indian Express Building in
New Delhi, India, very early 80s, during a lecture one afternoon,
someone asked Maharishi somewhere in the course of a discussion about
governments around the globe:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
on 4/17/06 1:27 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I stand by my original point -- ANYONE who can justify
*forcing* people to
And they all lived happily ever after.
Sal
On Apr 17, 2006, at 4:45 PM, bob_brigante wrote:
What MMY and the TMO holds up as a guide to the ideal form of
administration is The Ramayana, which recounts how Lord Rama ruled
at Ayodha for ~11,000 years some two million years ago. Lord Rama
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And they all lived happily ever after.
Sal
yeah-- very difficult to promote ideals during kali yuga because it is
so hard to sustain them. we keep trying though.
On Apr 17, 2006, at 4:45 PM, bob_brigante wrote:
36 matches
Mail list logo
