--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Oct 29, 2008, at 4:46 PM, raunchydog wrote:
snip
You raised a phony generalization about women haters
in order to attack me personally and you did so while
knowing nothing about who I love or who loves me, or
what I
Ruth the Race- baiter
The repetition of this term kind of reminds me of what is happening to
Obama.
I remember the little dust-up that lead to this charge. I remember
you guys differing in your opinion.
But with all Ruth's contributions to FFL, is this characterization
really fair?
Do you
On Nov 1, 2008, at 12:40 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
So I'll speak up now. This term is a mean-spirited,unnecessary,
gratuitous, personal attack, meant to slander a valued contributor to
FFL. Ruth is neither racist or race-baiter and whatever your
disagreements with her, she does not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ruth the Race- baiter
The repetition of this term kind of reminds me of what
is happening to Obama.
Yes, he's a race-baiter too.
I remember the little dust-up that lead to this charge. I
remember you guys
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 1, 2008, at 12:40 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
So I'll speak up now. This term is a mean-spirited,unnecessary,
gratuitous, personal attack, meant to slander a valued
contributor to
FFL. Ruth is neither racist
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just because you chosed the safe mainstream it gives you no right
to
critizise.
Safe and mainstream? What do you think I do for a living Nabby?
Playing hillbillymusic in bars.
I have a right to judge
Safe and mainstream? What do you think I do for a living Nabby?
Playing hillbillymusic in bars.
No, on every point. I had 17 shows last month and one was in a bar.
I wont try to straighten you out on the style of music I am spending
my life preserving. But claiming a fulltime artist
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Safe and mainstream? What do you think I do for a living Nabby?
Playing hillbillymusic in bars.
No, on every point. I had 17 shows last month and one was in
a bar.
I wont try to straighten you
And I believe your are fool.
Attacking the person rather than what he said. Nice touch Nabby, very
enlightened.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
Safe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I believe your are fool.
Attacking the person rather than what he said. Nice touch Nabby, very
enlightened.
I simply gave you up curtis because you seem totally stuck in a very
old fashioned way of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
And I believe your are fool.
Attacking the person rather than what he said. Nice touch Nabby, very
enlightened.
I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
And I believe your are fool.
Attacking
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as your points on the importance of women's rights, of
course I agree. I'm sure if I was a woman I would be the first
to call people on sexist language for its own sake, not because
it has been linked to
On Oct 29, 2008, at 3:31 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as your points on the importance of women's rights, of
course I agree. I'm sure if I was a woman I would be the first
to call people on sexist language for
Curtis wrote:
I would think any woman who is serious
about women's issues would want to join
me in condemning these two men.
Did you condemn these two men when you
were selling the mantras for the Marshy?
Why wait until now, some thirty years
after you first joined the cult? If I
felt
Vaj wrote:
I guess the Fairfield Life Femi-nazis never
heard the saying 'when you point a finger at
someone, there's three fingers pointing back
at you'.
You just compounded your error by calling the
women here a sexist name. In fact, there aren't
any Femi-nazis on this forum - you lied,
On Oct 29, 2008, at 9:11 AM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
Vaj wrote:
I guess the Fairfield Life Femi-nazis never
heard the saying 'when you point a finger at
someone, there's three fingers pointing back
at you'.
You just compounded your error by calling the
women here a sexist name. In fact,
Curtis wrote:
Sexist language is a dickish move.
Why does every conversation you join have to
come back to the subject of your dick and
their breasts? I always thought you were
crazy but now I can see your nuts - zip up
your pants and get a grip on yourself, and
stop being so anal retentive,
if you and curtis held yourselves to the same standard as you hold
the Maharishi, Guru Dev and Shakara, you would have nothing to say.
easy to take pot shots at a word or phrase here and there to make
your point when you don't stand behind your own thoughts and actions
as diligently. glass
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you and curtis held yourselves to the same standard as you hold
the Maharishi, Guru Dev and Shakara, you would have nothing to say.
easy to take pot shots at a word or phrase here and there to make
your
what I meant was that you have written volumes here Mr B. and has
curtis, and if taken to task for each and every thing you have said,
you would find yourself a very poor comparison to those you easily
denigrate. if you will not rigorously call bullshit on yourself, you
have no business
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what I meant was that you have written volumes here Mr B. and has
curtis, and if taken to task for each and every thing you have
said, you would find yourself a very poor comparison to those you
easily
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you and curtis held yourselves to the same standard as you hold
the Maharishi, Guru Dev and Shakara, you would have nothing to say.
easy to take pot shots at a word or phrase here and there to make
your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what I meant was that you have written volumes here Mr B. and has
curtis, and if taken to task for each and every thing you have said,
Two words: Judy Stein. Don't worry this base is covered here. Her
i am not trying to shoot you. i am curious though what it is you are
arguing against. hitler aside-- i think we can all agree he was
pretty much a complete asshole-- i am curious what point you are
making with Shankara and GuruDev and the Maharishi. is it that you
think everyone else here sees
I'm not Curtis, but I will reply, because these
are issues that interest me.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am curious what point you are making with Shankara
and GuruDev and the Maharishi. is it that you think
everyone else here sees
snip
i am curious what point you are
making with Shankara and GuruDev and the Maharishi.
That their traditions promoted a negative view of women that has gone
mostly unchallenged. That some spiritual traditions have gotten a
pass on views that most modern people agree are contemptible.
is
TurquoiseB wrote:
If you extend the comparison to Maharishi, neither
Curtis nor I ever extorted huge sums of money from
their followers for projects that were never built.
Neither Curtis nor I ever claimed to be celibate
while sneaking women to our rooms and screwing them.
Neither Curtis nor
hey thanks for all of what you have written. i always appreciate and
often enjoy the if you see the buddha on the road, kill him
perspective; I am advocating looking at them without the taboos of
protection these guys often get. excellent!
as for the Maharishi what do i think of him? not a lot
Hey, thanks for hitting the ball back and continuing the discussion.
That is what the place is all about IMO.
i like what the Maharishi said many times that we need to know who
we are before knowing what anyone or anything else is.
Didn't this seem more profound when we were young and didn't
the many assumptions you are making about my thinking and values
aside, this enlightenment=perfection thing is fascinating. i cannot
think of a single action anyone on the planet could perform without
at least one person objecting to it. i am not equivocating the
actions of an enlightened
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, thanks for hitting the ball back and continuing the
discussion.
That is what the place is all about IMO.
i like what the Maharishi said many times that we need to know
who
we are before knowing what
some people have real hot buttons when it comes to
spiritual/religion. wanted to know more about yours is all. thanks
again.
I would like to elevate hot buttons to my personal philosophical
cause. I am just as sincere in my belief that ancient spiritual
beliefs keep mankind in ignorant
I am just as sincere in my belief that ancient spiritual beliefs
keep mankind in ignorant bondage...-- taking what Tat Wale Baba
said about world peace being essentially a state created inside
first and then reflected outside, i am curious about this expression
of yours. i am not picking on
Sometime it takes an online conversation some time to find its way.
Thanks for hanging in there. Your post has some very thoughtful ideas
I would like to consider. In particular I appreciate your open minded
tone. That encourages conversation.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vaj wrote:
I guess the Fairfield Life Femi-nazis never
heard the saying 'when you point a finger at
someone, there's three fingers pointing back
at you'.
You just compounded your error by calling
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
i am curious what point you are
making with Shankara and GuruDev and the Maharishi.
That their traditions promoted a negative view of women that has
gone
mostly unchallenged.
What negative views ?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
willytex@ wrote:
Vaj wrote:
I guess the Fairfield Life Femi-nazis never
heard the saying 'when you point a finger at
someone, there's three fingers
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess the Fairfield Life Femi-nazis never heard the saying 'when
you point a finger at someone, there's three fingers pointing back at
you'.
They seem most likely to be women without current male relationships--
at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sometime it takes an online conversation some time to find its
way.
Thanks for hanging in there.
and thank you as well.
Your post has some very thoughtful ideas
I would like to consider. In particular I
-imperfect world, true:
On December 2, 1974 as he went to take his bath at 4:00 a.m., Sri Tat
Wale Baba was murdered by a crazy gunman. I soon had learned of the
incident from a friend. I wondered about the facts surrounding this
crime, and why somebody would want to kill Tat Wale Baba. I had
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
willytex@ wrote:
Vaj wrote:
I guess the Fairfield Life Femi-nazis never
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, yifuxero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-imperfect world, true:
On December 2, 1974 as he went to take his bath at 4:00 a.m., Sri
Tat
Wale Baba was murdered by a crazy gunman. I soon had learned of
the
incident from a friend. I wondered about the facts
On Oct 29, 2008, at 4:46 PM, raunchydog wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess the Fairfield Life Femi-nazis never heard the saying 'when
you point a finger at someone, there's three fingers pointing back at
you'.
They seem most likely to be women
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, yifuxero yifuxero@
wrote:
-imperfect world, true:
On December 2, 1974 as he went to take his bath at 4:00 a.m., Sri
Tat
Wale Baba was murdered by a crazy gunman.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
some said it was karma for his past service in the military. who
knows?
***
TWB was only in the military two months, unlikely to have accumulated
much karma, unless you are counting some past life (not
Just because you chosed the safe mainstream it gives you no right to
critizise.
Safe and mainstream? What do you think I do for a living Nabby?
I have a right to judge and criticize Guru Dev for sending a message
to women that they were not allowed to be in his presence. It was a
nasty
thanks for the website. i've seen it before but had forgetten about
it. dreds!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_reply@
wrote:
some said it was karma for his past service in the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 29, 2008, at 9:11 AM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
Vaj wrote:
I guess the Fairfield Life Femi-nazis never
heard the saying 'when you point a finger at
someone, there's three fingers pointing back
at you'.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
whoa- hold up there, pardner-- I agree with you regarding that
creepy call, but the thinking was deranged vs. Guru-love
scriptures
who have very clear physical threats against speaking against
the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a story in the Shrimad Bhagavatam about Indra, the king of
the demigods, who seduced his guru's wife. When the guru found out
about this insult, he cursed Indra to have thousands of vaginas all
over Indra's body.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've used them now and then when a guy has been
swinging his dick around. It's a little sexist to
make fun of men's protectiveness toward their
genitals when they've been enthusiatically waving
them about, but it's not
Judy wrote:
Lawson and I led the charge against Skolnick,
but many others did their part. He nearly
went nuts because he couldn't get away with
anything.
Read more: http://tinyurl.com/6prvs8
Author: Lawson English
Subject: No apology here
Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental,
I'd recommend watching A Clockwork Orange
for behavior mod.
enlightened_dawn wrote:
ouch!
Barry has a lot of money and psychic energy
invested in the worship of gurus. He says it's
all worth it and he has only harsh words for
former cult members who speak out against the
likes of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
snip
You claimed that you and Raunchy had death threats
hurled at you.
I said misogynistic vomit, including death
threats, had been
Willytex, you've just justified your existence.
That is a *fabulous* find. I'd forgotten all
about this thread. It's worth reading the whole
thing; it puts the flamewars here to shame, in
both style and substance.
It's mostly a knock-down, drag-out flame-duel
on alt.m.t between Barry and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've remarked before on the moral and ethical
vacuity of FFL. That vacuum has now become almost
total.
ETHICAL VACUITY
Dripping dark ink
Pen of groupthink
Willing herds trample
To set an example
Playing the game
Blame
I gave two, both from one post of Barry's.
Last, hopefully, point on this for those who
haven't been following it closely enough to
recognize how grossly it's been distorted by
Barry and his minions.
I hope you are not including me among the distorting minions (another
good rock band
On Oct 28, 2008, at 11:53 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
Last, hopefully, point on this for those who
haven't been following it closely enough to
recognize how grossly it's been distorted by
Barry and his minions.
I hope you are not including me among the distorting minions
(another good rock
On Oct 28, 2008, at 11:53 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
I hope you are not including me among the distorting minions (another
good rock band name).
A death threat is a very different kind of communication than wishing
someone was dead and saying so. I was originally concerned that such
a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Oct 28, 2008, at 11:53 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
If such a treat had been made
Uh, oh, Curtis, there you go again, doggonnit. Will
you please get out of this Halloween mode? Things
are scary enough around
On Oct 28, 2008, at 12:33 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
On Oct 28, 2008, at 11:53 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
If such a treat had been made
Uh, oh, Curtis, there you go again, doggonnit. Will
you please get out of this Halloween mode? Things
are scary enough around here as it is.
Interestingly,
Judy wrote:
Willytex, you've just justified your existence.
Classics from the a.m.t. grooveyard!
That is a *fabulous* find. I'd forgotten all
about this thread. It's worth reading the whole
thing; it puts the flamewars here to shame, in
both style and substance.
It's mostly a knock-down,
---Looks like you're onto something!. Also Willytex, that book on
Kashmir Shaivism that you recommended is excellent. Thanks.
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy wrote:
Willytex, you've just justified your existence.
Classics from the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I gave two, both from one post of Barry's.
Last, hopefully, point on this for those who
haven't been following it closely enough to
recognize how grossly it's been distorted by
Barry and his
snip
I hope you are not including me among the distorting minions
You did your part, Curtis. And you're doing
more of it now.
I have distorted nothing by asking you to back up your claim of a
death threat. Shooting the messenger doesn't work with me.
snip
After quite a bit of tap
fwiw, Dickhead almost sounds like a Jethro Tull song, only it also
sounds unfinished. Rather than being just another Barry bashing song
(which would be like so last week...), why not just make it a
diatribe against self-centeredness and isolation? something like:
ego is as ego does
slander
TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Oct 28, 2008, at 11:53 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
If such a treat had been made
Uh, oh, Curtis, there you go again, doggonnit. Will
you please get out of this Halloween mode?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I hope you are not including me among the distorting minions
You did your part, Curtis. And you're doing
more of it now.
I have distorted nothing by asking you to back up your claim
of a death
We are in agreement that Olbermann's comment was way out of line.
I wasn't playing along with Barry, I was the first person to bring the
question up.
What we consider nitpicking is different. I don't follow your feud
with Barry too closely and miss many posts between you, so I was
genuinely
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are in agreement that Olbermann's comment was way
out of line.
We are not in agreement about *why* he was out
of line. We are not in agreement that his remark
was irrelevant to this current controversy because
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any woman who wants to fight men for political power had better get
off the sexist claims real fast if they want to be taken seriously.
This is one good reason why women should object to sexist language,
its
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
Any woman who wants to fight men for political power had better get
off the sexist claims real fast if they want to be taken seriously.
snip
I wasn't playing along with Barry, I was the first person
to bring the question up.
You most certainly were not; Barry was. He had
already made three hysterical posts, and several
other people had also weighed in, before you had
said a word. You came in very much in the middle.
I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
As far as your points on the importance of women's rights, of
course I agree. I'm sure if I was a woman I would be the
first to call people on sexist language for its own sake, not
because it has been linked
The only thing that has certainly died around here is the dead horse
you have been beating.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to be sure, and that no one missed my
request because it was buried at the bottom
of a thread they weren't reading, I'm
Given Barry's frequent insistence that nothing
he says is to be taken seriously, I'm sure he'll
agree that he doesn't intend the following to be
taken seriously either. In the same spirit, I'll
say right up front that nobody should take my
dissection of his poll seriously.
--- In
Of course, Barry wants to be taken seriously. Why else would he rig a
poll in his favor? Imagining he has won his argument, and runs a
vigorous victory lap around the forum with his stuffed ballot box in
tow before anyone has even bothered to vote, he pretends disparately
that someone cares while
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Note also that Barry has never dealt with *my*
definition of a death threat. Mine and his are
quite different, as he knows.
A further note on this, because it's really the
heart of the dispute.
First, note that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll be happy to explain how I was using the
term death threats and why Barry's finely
crafted definition and his humor excuse don't
apply, if anybody is interested.
Do tell.
I doubt anyone will be, and that's fine,
I'll be happy to explain how I was using the
term death threats and why Barry's finely
crafted definition and his humor excuse don't
apply, if anybody is interested.
I doubt anyone will be, and that's fine, except
in that case, they aren't in a position to have
an opinion on whether my
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only thing that has certainly died around here is the dead horse
you have been beating.
I will take that as a big No, I do not agree
that a death threat was made on FFL against Judy
Stein, and also a No that you
from what I can tell this whole Barry-Judy dynamic is both childish
and toxic. nothing to be gained or learned from either one when they
are in this mode.
seems like both of them are trying to prove to the other, and this
forum, that each is superior; trying to solve the problem at the
level
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll be happy to explain how I was using the
term death threats and why Barry's finely
crafted definition and his humor excuse don't
apply, if anybody is interested.
I doubt anyone will be, and that's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
from what I can tell this whole Barry-Judy dynamic is
both childish and toxic. nothing to be gained or learned
from either one when they are in this mode.
Says enlightened_dawn11 before having read (because
I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 no_reply@
wrote:
from what I can tell this whole Barry-Judy dynamic is
both childish and toxic. nothing to be gained or learned
from either one when they
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it is the context i was talking about- the context is that you and
Mr. B are trying to convince each other, yourselves, and those on
this forum of the superiority of your respective positions.
This is not
For the record, ed11, you haven't been around
long enough to realize that Barry's tirade in
this post represents his *fantasy* image of me,
not the real person, nor the person most perceive
me to be on this forum. What he describes of
himself is also a fantasy image, one he hopes
others will
snip
When I left the movement (probably after some article came
out with my opinion of the movement) I got a message on my
phone machine (remember them!) that said:
Nature will silence you!
Although it does have a sinister vibe and was creepy, I don't
think a movement person
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_reply@
wrote:
from what I can tell this whole Barry-Judy dynamic is
both
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you read anything from me suggesting that I felt
physically threatened by what Barry said, Curtis?
Yes, it was the claim of a death threat.
Which, by the way, fits the legal definition
of slander.
Judy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I'm taking my own poll: How many here believe
that Barry wants his poll to be taken seriously?
Anybody?
Buehler?
Nothing that fellow writes is to be taken seriously as he is only
venting his frustration of
On Oct 27, 2008, at 10:18 AM, raunchydog wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll be happy to explain how I was using the
term death threats and why Barry's finely
crafted definition and his humor excuse don't
apply, if anybody is interested.
Do
On Oct 27, 2008, at 10:46 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
Anyway Judy I would like to hear how Turq's statements seemed like
death threats to you.
They aren't, this whole thing is just made up nonsense because
Barry won't interact with Judy any more.
Judy's FOAD, said to both Rick and me, is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
So I'm taking my own poll: How many here believe
that Barry wants his poll to be taken seriously?
Anybody?
Buehler?
Nothing that fellow
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
When I left the movement (probably after some article came
out with my opinion of the movement) I got a message on my
phone machine (remember them!) that said:
Nature will silence you!
HaHa,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
snip
When I left the movement (probably after some article came
out with my opinion of the movement) I got a message on my
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
So I'm taking my own poll: How many here believe
that Barry wants his
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
snip
When I left the movement (probably after
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Oct 27, 2008, at 10:46 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
Anyway Judy I would like to hear how Turq's statements seemed like
death threats to you.
They aren't, this whole thing is just made up nonsense because
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
