Burlingtons great, and Waterbury is an up and coming place. And
everywhere else in the world is downhill from Vermont.:-)
Off
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I live in the Boston area now, but I was born in
Burlington, at the UVM hospital. My
My sister lives just north of Montpelier in Mooretown,
VT.
--- off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Burlingtons great, and Waterbury is an up and coming
place. And
everywhere else in the world is downhill from
Vermont.:-)
Off
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool
-
Nice memories of Vermont! I went to high school in Saxton's River, then
lived in a college TM-dorm in Plainfield (Goddard College).Became a teacher
of you-know-what through Goddard under-graduate programs, eventually
transferring to MIU, in Goleta...except that last minute
On Dec 4, 2005, at 11:23 PM, sparaig wrote:em•pa•thy Pronunciation: (em'pu-thç), [key] —n. 1. the intellectual identification with or vicarious experiencing of the feelings, thoughts, or attitudes of another. 2. the imaginative ascribing to an object, as a natural object or work of art,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Poor, persecuted Vaj. How could he *not* feel a
sense of kinship with poor, persecuted Andrew?
Innocent as the day is long, both of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 3, 2005, at 9:51 AM, authfriend wrote:
In any other context
Barry, this is *Lawson* you're talking to, for
heaven's sakes. He's been on alt.m.t at least
as long as you or I. He knows what's gone on
there. What on earth were you thinking to try
to lay this delusional rap on him?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 12/3/05 2:25 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I wouldn't askyou to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Barry, this is *Lawson* you're talking to, for
heaven's sakes. He's been on alt.m.t at least
as long as you or I. He knows what's gone on
there. What on earth were you thinking to try
to lay this delusional rap on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mrsatva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mrsatva" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
So if I limit myself to the occasional cheap shot about
her dried-up pussy, count yourself lucky. It's much
better than me going
What's wrong with this guy's spelling?
Write the exact same thing he just said in German and
we'll ask him to critique your spelling.
--- off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mrsatva
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
First of all I think what you mean't to say is: It
was me who
posted it - gullible fool
Nope, it wasn't me.
By the way, you misspelled meant.
--- off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What's wrong
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 12/5/05 6:35 PM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What's wrong with this guy's spelling?
Write the exact
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
First of all I think what you mean't to say is: It
was me who
posted it - gullible fool
Nope, it wasn't me.
By the way, you misspelled meant.
Not where I come from.
--- off_world_beings [EMAIL
Not where I come from.
Vermont? If so, we come from the same place.
--- off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
First of all I think what you mean't to say is:
It
was me who
posted it -
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Not where I come from.
Vermont? If so, we come from the same place.
Nah, I just live here. Where in Vermont are you from?
--- off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
I live in the Boston area now, but I was born in
Burlington, at the UVM hospital. My mother grew up in
Waterbury and I lived the first two weeks of my life
there and spent lots of vacation time there growing
up.
--- off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
--- Irmeli Mattsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think the point here is that one's credilbility
lies
not in some sort of objective criteria we can all
agree upon. These allegations of sexual advances
and/or acts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 3, 2005, at 9:51 AM, authfriend wrote:
In any other context than dumping on me or another
committed TMer (as I've observed before in similar
contexts), Barry would insist that behavior is not
an indication of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think the point here is that one's credilbility lies
not in some sort of objective criteria we can all
agree upon.
I think that the point is that, as always, those
who don't like the message try to call into question
the
--- TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 3, 2005, at 9:51 AM, authfriend wrote:
In any other context than dumping on me or
another
committed TMer (as I've observed before in
similar
contexts), Barry would
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
From what Rick has said, a large portion of MMY's secretaries not
only have had sex with him but have mentioned it to him or have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 3, 2005, at 9:51 AM, authfriend wrote:
In any other context than dumping on me or
another
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
From what Rick has said, a large portion of MMY's secretaries
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL
Do you *never* get tired of this nonsense, Barry? You mean you can't even accept an apology graciously?
If Judy's posts, or anyone else's, bother you so much, why not just delete them? I know, I could do the same with yours, but the steady stream of insults for the last half-dozen posts or so
Or a politician. Or a faculty member at MUM.
Sal
On Dec 4, 2005, at 9:28 AM, anonymousff wrote:
Gotcha posts are focussed on showing that the poster is dumb,
perverse, a rogue, and liar, and/or a hypocrite
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 12/3/05 3:25 PM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No, I thought you mean't what is considered a credible quote.
Obviously something that is gossip and is not published cannot be
considered to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 12/3/05 3:25 PM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No, I thought you mean't what is considered a credible quote.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 12/3/05 2:25 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I wouldn't askyou to doubt a friend, but I DO ask
you to wonder why
they bother talking about it to you? Is it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debate as focussed on ideas. If there is some incorrect fact or
logic, or one disagrees with presumptions of the poster, its all
fine and good to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
Gotcha posts are focussed on showing that the poster is dumb,
On Dec 4, 2005, at 12:41 PM, anonymousff wrote:Its far more than tone. Its primarily focus. Gotcha posts focus on personal attacks. Debate focusses on futhering the understanding of ideas. Exactly. And it has to do with intent, though admitedly that is not always easy to discern clearly and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 4, 2005, at 12:41 PM, anonymousff wrote:
Its far more than tone. Its primarily focus. Gotcha posts focus on
personal attacks. Debate focusses on futhering the understanding
of ideas.
Exactly.
And it has to do
You are manifesting the bitchy aspect of the
Yonified Field.
I think her Yoni dried up and withered away in
disgust decades ago; it certainly wasn't being
used for anything. :-)
U! Low blow, low blow. Deduct two points from
Turquois.
For some reason, Barry has
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Irmeli Mattsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think the point here is that one's credilbility
lies
not in some sort of objective
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You are manifesting the bitchy aspect of the
Yonified Field.
I think her Yoni dried up and withered away in
disgust decades ago; it certainly wasn't being
used for anything. :-)
U!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 4, 2005, at 12:41 PM, anonymousff wrote:
Its far more than tone. Its primarily focus. Gotcha posts
focus on
personal attacks. Debate
Could ithave something to do with the Brain structure.?? More White matter than Grey matter.??OriginalMessage- From: "Robert Gimbel" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 00:54:56 - Subject: [FairfieldLife]
Re: Hurdy Gurdy Man reve
on 12/3/05 11:42 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 12/3/05 3:25 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, they're quite private, even secretive. Maharishi
isn't people.
But WHY do they talk
on 12/3/05 11:50 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what Rick has said, a large portion of MMY's secretaries not
only have had sex with him but have mentioned it to him or have
publicised it in some way.
I didn't say anything of the sort (boy, it's a good thing I read a few of
your
on 12/4/05 12:07 AM, anonymousff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He had no female secretaries. That is the point. So you are obscurely
making the point that he did not have sex?
That you heard Rick say that M had sex with female secretaries says
alot about your cognitive processes -- and
on 12/4/05 10:33 AM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 12/3/05 3:25 PM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am certain, *postive,* in fact, that I heard someone who heard it from someone who heard it from someone else...that Colonel Mustard and Miss Scarlet had sex in the parlor.
Sal
On Dec 4, 2005, at 4:59 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
on 12/4/05 12:07 AM, anonymousff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 12/4/05 10:33 AM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 3, 2005, at 9:51 AM, authfriend wrote:
In any other context than dumping on me or another
committed TMer (as I've observed before in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 4, 2005, at 12:41 PM, anonymousff wrote:
Its far more than tone. Its primarily focus. Gotcha posts focus on
personal attacks. Debate focusses on futhering the understanding
of
ideas.
Exactly.
And it has
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
I consider that site a badge of honor.
If anyone wants to pick up something from it about
me they consider particularly damning and post it
here, I'll be happy to provide the facts.
Me 2, though his inability to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 12/3/05 11:50 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what Rick has said, a large portion of MMY's secretaries not
only have had sex with him but have mentioned it to him or have
publicised it in some
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
I consider that site a badge of honor.
If anyone wants to pick up something from it about
me they consider particularly damning and post it
On Dec 4, 2005, at 8:24 PM, sparaig wrote:Don't forget to check the "doormouse" references to moi on that site. That you feel empathy towards *Skolnick* of all people, speaks volumes about you, Vaj... I don't recall saying I felt empathy for this person.
To subscribe, send a message to:
on 12/4/05 7:34 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, misunderstood who said what and did what with whom.
And now we're to believe that the women just casually bragged about the
sex they'd had? That's groupie talk, IMHO.
I don't think it was casual. Probably, in time, the enormity of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
For but one informative site, check out:
http://www.aaskolnick.com/junkyarddog/
Unfortunately, it only scratches the surface.
Don't forget
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 4, 2005, at 8:24 PM, sparaig wrote:
Don't forget to check the doormouse references to moi on that
site.
That you feel empathy towards *Skolnick* of all people, speaks
volumes about you, Vaj...
I don't recall
That doesn't answer the question, Rick. At what point do their stories become believable--after college? Graduate school? How about during graduate school? And does it matter if they are getting a Ph.D or an MA? How about a teaching certificate? And what about if they happen to be highly
On Dec 3, 2005, at 12:23 AM, authfriend wrote:
Still think there's any ambiguity about what he meant?
Actually Rick encapsulated my overall meaning very accurately. Yes
there were sexual indiscretions--spiritual incest--but there are
other perverse things as well.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 12/2/05 10:03 PM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Were these women highly educated and established
in professional
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 3, 2005, at 12:23 AM, authfriend wrote:
Still think there's any ambiguity about what he meant?
Actually Rick encapsulated my overall meaning very accurately. Yes
there were sexual indiscretions--spiritual
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 12/2/05 10:03 PM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are times when being On The Road and thus
unable to check FFL regularly is a real blessing.
I've been back in Santa Fe, gazing at beautiful
sunsets and sunrises (enjoying one of the latter
at this very moment, outside the windows of this
WiFi cafe), having wonderful conversations with
My god, you actually save this stuff from months ago? I'm sorry,
that's just plain strange.
On Dec 3, 2005, at 8:54 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 3, 2005, at 12:23 AM, authfriend wrote:
Still think there's any ambiguity about
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The Jews killed Jesus and Maharishi killed Guru Dev...so what's the
problem?
...Yeah. And after you have placed your first fragment
of evidence on the table, kindly link him to JFK or
Pricess Di. It'd make a more
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There are times when being On The Road and thus
unable to check FFL regularly is a real blessing.
I've been back in Santa Fe, gazing at beautiful
sunsets and sunrises (enjoying one of the latter
at this very moment,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My god, you actually save this stuff from months ago? I'm sorry,
that's just plain strange.
Uh, no, these quotes are from the Google archive.
That's why, you know, I provided the thread title
for anyone who wanted to see them
On Dec 3, 2005, at 9:51 AM, authfriend wrote:
In any other context than dumping on me or another
committed TMer (as I've observed before in similar
contexts), Barry would insist that behavior is not
an indication of spiritual development.
You are manifesting the bitchy aspect of the
on 12/2/05 11:33 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For a woman to gossip about a former relationship, whether with a
president or a guru or the kid next door, shows an ax to grind.
The women I'm referring to haven't gossiped. Have not spoken about it
publicly. Probably don't feel like
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are times when being On The Road and thus
unable to check FFL regularly is a real blessing.
One month ago, our fiber optic line was sliced by a backhoe, and it,
too, has been a real blessing. With my online time
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[snip]
Speaking of cognitive dissonance...
Thank goodness there are other posters here like Tom
and Rick and Vaj
[snip]
And we all know
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hurdy Gurdy Man revealed
I dont know if this is a significant topic, since most TM teachers are well-educated and from middle or upper class families, but the point was (I think) that were not talking about topless dancers here. OK, now that will start
Quite right and delicious points sal. I think Rick may be on the
perverbial slippery slope here. As might we all. I vaguely nodded when
Rick wrote his first reply -- educated, professional women -- etc,
yes, credible types I thought.
But to whom is the distiction being made? Educated,
on 12/3/05 10:57 AM, anonymousff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, yes, following on to Sal's thought, tell us Rick (and all -- my
self included) at what degrading level of education, profession and
social standing does a woman become not credible -- compared to the
ascending crown of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[snip]
Speaking of cognitive dissonance...
Thank
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don¹t know if this is a significant topic, since most TM teachers are
well-educated and from middle or upper class families, but the point
was (I
think) that we¹re not talking about topless dancers here. OK, now
that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 12/3/05 10:57 AM, anonymousff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, yes, following on to Sal's thought, tell us Rick (and all -- my
self included) at what degrading level of education, profession and
social standing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The Jews killed Jesus and Maharishi killed Guru Dev...so what's the
problem?
You have it backwards, Guru Dev killed Maharishi.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get fast
Response below:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B
On Dec 3, 2005, at 10:57 AM, anonymousff wrote:
But to whom is the distiction being made? Educated, professional
women, are generally honest? Compared to what group of women who are
generally less so? Trailer trash? Redneck women? Walmart employees?
The stereotypes of personality traits one
A nice brush-off, Rick, but it still doesn't answer the question, about these particular women, not about TMers in general. If you don't want to, okay. That's pretty much of an answer in itself, which is apparently all the answer we will get.
Sal
On Dec 3, 2005, at 10:51 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hurdy Gurdy Man revealed
on 12/3/05 12:24 PM, Sal Sunshine at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A nice brush-off, Rick, but it still doesn't answer the question, about these particular women, not about TMers in general. If you don't want to, okay. That's pretty much
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Response below:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Here is the context:
And
On Dec 3, 2005, at 1:02 PM, Peter wrote:
I think the point here is that one's credilbility lies
not in some sort of objective criteria we can all
agree upon.
Exactly.
These allegations of sexual advances
and/or acts by MMY are believed by some and denied by
others.
I don't doubt them. I
I think the point here is that one's credilbility lies
not in some sort of objective criteria we can all
agree upon. These allegations of sexual advances
and/or acts by MMY are believed by some and denied by
others. A lot of it has to do with our own concept of
what and who MMY is to us. Frankly,
on 12/3/05 1:02 PM, Peter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the point here is that one's credilbility lies
not in some sort of objective criteria we can all
agree upon. These allegations of sexual advances
and/or acts by MMY are believed by some and denied by
others. A lot of it has to do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 12/2/05 10:03 PM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 3, 2005, at 9:51 AM, authfriend wrote:
In any other context than dumping on me or another
committed TMer (as I've observed before in similar
contexts), Barry would insist that behavior is not
an indication of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 12/2/05 11:33 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For a woman to gossip about a former relationship, whether with a
president or a guru or the kid next door, shows an ax to grind.
The women I'm referring
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver
[...]
If I may be permitted a small digression: the term spiritual
incest cannot be correctly
understood by exactly parsing its constituents. It has a special
meaning which applies
most clearly in the cult context. You have argued against
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Quite right and delicious points sal. I think Rick may be on the
perverbial slippery slope here. As might we all. I vaguely nodded
when
Rick wrote his first reply -- educated, professional women -- etc,
yes, credible
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 12/2/05 6:55 PM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Maybe, but don't forget that Krisna in mythology had 16,000
wives.
http://www.pantheon.org/articles/k/krishna.html
Oh, and regarding todays
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 12/3/05 1:02 PM, Peter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the point here is that one's credilbility lies
not in some sort of objective criteria we can all
agree upon. These allegations of sexual advances
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver
[...]
If I may be permitted a small digression: the term spiritual
incest cannot be correctly
understood by exactly parsing its constituents. It has a special
1 - 100 of 239 matches
Mail list logo
