--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote:
> >
> > It's the same way of thinking, though. The idea that "we" know
more
> than
> > "they" do about what's good for them. If you talk to people on
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The campus itself went stapathya Vedic and now there are like 100
> students occupying a 200 acre campus, 2 acres per student.
>
> It's a ghost town, soon it will resemble a Hindu Ghost Town, nice
> buildings run by sk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote:
> >
> >
> > And the news for those who would go into an orgy of delight if
MUM
> folded is .
> > . . it ain't gonna happen. For those who live in Fairfield, go
t
I got a good laugh out of this, especially your comment, "Since the advent of
Stapathya Veda the place reminds me of a Madame
> Blavatsky convention, a bunch of aged dour looking people." Have you
been to Annapurna dining hall recently, Anon? I think you might be surprised
at what you find ther
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> And the news for those who would go into an orgy of delight if MUM
folded is .
> . . it ain't gonna happen. For those who live in Fairfield, go take
a look at the
> new construction going on there. MUM is in a growth
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's the same way of thinking, though. The idea that "we" know more
than
> "they" do about what's good for them. If you talk to people on
campus about
> why they are there, you will get almost as many answers as there
Sure, it's just great, Feste. When are you moving there? :)
Sal
On Mar 14, 2006, at 10:23 AM, feste37 wrote:
Rick sounds like the Bush Administration, wanting to "liberate" subject
peoples. Has it occurred to anyone on this board that people who live at
MUM might actually enjoy the experi
on 3/14/06 10:51 AM, feste37 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's the same way of thinking, though. The idea that "we" know more than
> "they" do about what's good for them. If you talk to people on campus about
> why they are there, you will get almost as many answers as there are people.
> Everyon
The bulk of the people who have chosen to remain in FF, after pretty
much having severed their ties to the MIU/MUM way of life are anything
but Plain Folks.
Following Lady Saints (not that there's anything wrong with that),
doing fire yagyas and the like, and the myriad host of other types of
spi
It's the same way of thinking, though. The idea that "we" know more than
"they" do about what's good for them. If you talk to people on campus about
why they are there, you will get almost as many answers as there are people.
Everyone has their own reasons. Instead of talking about people needin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Rick sounds like the Bush Administration, wanting to "liberate" subject
> peoples. Has it occurred to anyone on this board that people who
live at
> MUM might actually enjoy the experience? That's why they live there!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'd start saying bye-by
Rick sounds like the Bush Administration, wanting to "liberate" subject
peoples. Has it occurred to anyone on this board that people who live at
MUM might actually enjoy the experience? That's why they live there!
May heaven save us from self-appointed "liberators."
--- In FairfieldLife@yah
on 3/14/06 9:48 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> 2) it would be very sad for Fairfield if MUM went away, don't you
>> agree?
>
> Not really.
Might be good for it. Something more "interesting" may take over the
university. Fairfield is well established as an eclectic spiritual comm
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd start saying bye-bye to MUM if I were you. If they
> > > lose a multi-million-dollar
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > I'd start saying bye-bye to MUM if I were you. If they
> > lose a multi-million-dollar lawsuit in addition to
> > having no students, I'd bet that Fairfield
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > on 3/13/06 10:10 PM, shempmcgurk at shempmcgurk@ wrote:>>
> > > >
> > > > H
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > PErhaps because they DID screw up, to some extent?
> > >
> > > What "perhaps"?
on 3/14/06 1:50 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just *think* how many similar tragedies within the
> TM movement will get to come out in this lawsuit.
> Ya got the suicides on TM courses, ya got the guy
> burning himself to death after having been locked
> away in a basement room.
No
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 14, 2006, at 9:07 AM, authfriend wrote:
>
> > > I don't know Joel, but it's very possible that he's
> > > like some people here and convinced that he was "not
> > > the doer" in this whole scenario and thus bears no
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > PEr
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > PErhaps because they DID screw up, to some extent?
> > >
> > > What "perhaps"?
On Mar 14, 2006, at 9:07 AM, authfriend wrote:
> > I don't know Joel, but it's very possible that he's
> > like some people here and convinced that he was "not
> > the doer" in this whole scenario and thus bears no
> > responsibility for it whatsoever.
>
> Amazing. Barry's *still* getting "not t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I could easily have been guilty of the same negligence
> > > Joel Wysong dis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> wrote:
> >
> > I could easily have been guilty of the same negligence
> > Joel Wysong displayed while watching the guy. I suspect
> > he was in the other room medi
On Mar 13, 2006, at 10:41 PM, wayback71 wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mar 13, 2006, at 9:21 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
> >
> > > An MUM staffer says that Bevan and lawyers are putting quite a bit
> > > into the
> > > lawsuit against MUM b
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ...and this is where the negligence occurred...and we all know why
> it occurred: the TMO and MUM did not want to inflate crime figures
> for a TMing environment that would disprove the Maharishi Effect.
>
> Is t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> wrote:
> >
> > on 3/13/06 10:10 PM, shempmcgurk at shempmcgurk@ wrote:>>
> > >
> > > He should get counselling.
> > >
> > > I'm serious.
> > >
> > > If Joel is fee
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 3/13/06 10:10 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:>>
> >
> > He should get counselling.
> >
> > I'm serious.
> >
> > If Joel is feeling any amount of guilt it should only be to the
> > degree that it was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > > PErhaps because they DID screw up, to some extent?
> >
> > What "perhaps"? It was a clear case of negligence.
>
> A guy got scratched in the face
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I could easily have been guilty of the same negligence
> Joel Wysong displayed while watching the guy. I suspect
> he was in the other room meditating when Sem stole the
> knife and left his house. Then he sat and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 3/13/06 10:32 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >
> > A guy got scratched in the face with a pen in a scuffle. Do you
> > believe that the prof was negligent in turning his back and taking a
> > show
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2006, at 9:21 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
>
> > An MUM staffer says that Bevan and lawyers are putting quite a
bit
> > into the
> > lawsuit against MUM brought by the parents of Levi Butler. The
suit
> > draws
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 3/13/06 10:32 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >
> > A guy got scratched in the face with a pen in a scuffle. Do you
> > believe that the prof was negligent in turning his back and taking
a
> > sho
on 3/13/06 10:32 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>
> A guy got scratched in the face with a pen in a scuffle. Do you
> believe that the prof was negligent in turning his back and taking a
> shower? Obviously, he didn't believe the guy to be any kind of threat.
>
Didn't the "scratch" r
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 3/13/06 10:10 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:>>
> >
> > He should get counselling.
> >
> > I'm serious.
> >
> > If Joel is feeling any amount of guilt it should only be to the
> > degree that it was
on 3/13/06 10:10 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:>>
>
> He should get counselling.
>
> I'm serious.
>
> If Joel is feeling any amount of guilt it should only be to the
> degree that it was his responsibility to follow the code of conduct
> as published by the university: that is, that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > An MUM staffer says that Bevan and lawyers are putting quite a
> bit
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> wrote:
> >
> > An MUM staffer says that Bevan and lawyers are putting quite a
bit
> into the
> > lawsuit against MUM brought by the parents of Levi Butler. The
sui
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 3/13/06 9:41 PM, wayback71 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > No one person is to blame for this tragedy. For example, I
imagine that the
> > parents of
> > Sem wish, in retrospect, thatthey had never let him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> An MUM staffer says that Bevan and lawyers are putting quite a bit
into the
> lawsuit against MUM brought by the parents of Levi Butler. The suit
draws a
> bigger line to include other TM organizations besides MUM;
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mar 13, 2006, at 9:21 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
> >
> > > An MUM staffer says that Bevan and lawyers are putting quite a
bit
> > > into the
> > > laws
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 3/13/06 9:41 PM, wayback71 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > No one person is to blame for this tragedy. For example, I
imagine that the
> > parents of
> > Sem wish, in retrospect, thatthey had never let him
on 3/13/06 9:41 PM, wayback71 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> No one person is to blame for this tragedy. For example, I imagine that the
> parents of
> Sem wish, in retrospect, thatthey had never let him go far from home to go to
> college
> when he had a history (didn't he?) of mental illness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2006, at 9:21 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
>
> > An MUM staffer says that Bevan and lawyers are putting quite a bit
> > into the
> > lawsuit against MUM brought by the parents of Levi Butler. The suit
> > draws a
Someone asked me to post:
Re MUM lawsuit
Orthey will have to dip into the finances assoc w/ MMY in
India...which MMY won't give up a pennyso I will predict..
are you ready
are you sure.
they will start a donation program to raise money for the legal defense
---
47 matches
Mail list logo
