On Jul 4, 2006, at 10:19 PM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Check out: http://www.orgonomy.org/ Ok, I will. On Jul 4, 2006, at 9:48 PM, new.morning wrote: I have been hearing of Reich for 35 years. Have yet to see much of substance.
On Jul 4, 2006, at 10:25 PM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: Check out: http://www.orgonomy.org/ Ok, I will. Mission accomplished. "Using Reich's astrophysical
On Jul 4, 2006, at 10:35 PM, new.morning wrote: Scientists believe far more wierd ass things than you or I. Well at least me. :) String theory, quantum theory, relativity theory. The latter two because they have been extraodianrily successful in predicting what the model says should happen. No
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/05/business/05coalfuel.html
The coal in the ground in Illinois alone has more energy than all the
oil in Saudi Arabia. The technology to turn that coal into fuel for
cars, homes and
On Jul 5, 2006, at 8:45 AM, Michael Murphy wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/05/business/05coalfuel.html "The coal in the ground in Illinois alone has more energy than all the oil in Saudi Arabia. The technology to
Responses interleaved:
--- Vaj wrote:
read Orson Bean's
(yes the guy who used to be on Truth or Consequences a lot) _Me and
Orgone_ (I can email a copy of it I found)
Would you email it to me? I once read that Orson Bean would stay up all night
working on a
joke. That's my kind of
I don't think coal will ever replace oil. Everybody knows the
effect coal had in creating acid rain and deforestation around the world.
However it will still be used at current levels and maybe a little higher or at
least until there is a technology to burn significantly
cleaner.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think coal will ever replace oil. Everybody knows the
effect coal
had in creating acid rain and deforestation around the world.
However it will
still be used at current levels and maybe a little higher or at
least
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think coal will ever replace oil. Everybody knows the effect coal
had in creating acid rain and deforestation around the world. However it
will
still be used at current levels and maybe a little higher or at least
In a message dated 7/5/06 10:53:02 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
[EMAIL PROTECTED].. wrote: I don't think coal will ever
replace oil. Everybody knows the effect coal had in creating acid
rain and deforestation
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/5/06 10:53:02 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com)
, MDixon6569@, MDi
I don't think coal will ever replace
Peak oil theory is based on the possibly flawed theory that world oil
reserves are fixed when there are some recent ideas in geology that
talk of crude oil as being a kind of natural exudate of the earth. In
other words the planet naturally produces these substances slowly
over time.
On Jul 4, 2006, at 7:41 PM, Michael Murphy wrote: Peak oil theory is based on the possibly flawed theory that world oil reserves are "fixed" when there are some recent ideas in geology that talk of crude oil as being a kind of natural exudate of the earth. In other words the planet
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea that it's hard or impossible to bootstrap new technologies
into large scale production IMO is a lie. It's a lie perpetutated by
corporatism--and of course inspired by energy corps and their Czars.
In WW II
I have been hearing of Reich for 35 years. Have yet to see much of
substance. Though he was popular in the 60's as the advocate of social
problems being due to too little indiscriminant sex. Popular set of
lines developed quoting Reich. And no valid research on his orgone
boxes energies in those
On Jul 4, 2006, at 9:15 PM, new.morning wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea that it's hard or impossible to bootstrap new technologies
into large scale production IMO is a lie. It's a lie perpetutated by
corporatism--and of course inspired by
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you know, most
scientists do not accept the existence of a universal life energy!
um a priori? Or because no credible research on such has been repeated
presented peer-reviewed, published, debated and refined.
Scientists
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you know, most
scientists do not accept the existence of a universal life energy!
um a priori? Or because no credible research on such has been repeated
presented peer-reviewed, published, debated and refined.
Scientists
On Jul 4, 2006, at 10:16 PM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As you know, most scientists do not accept the existence of a universal life energy! um a priori? Or because no credible research on such has been repeated presented
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out:
http://www.orgonomy.org/
Ok, I will.
On Jul 4, 2006, at 9:48 PM, new.morning wrote:
I have been hearing of Reich for 35 years. Have yet to see much of
substance.
There a huge amount of material out
On Jul 4, 2006, at 10:16 PM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As you know, most scientists do not accept the existence of a universal life energy! um a priori? Or because no credible research on such has been repeated presented
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
Check out:
http://www.orgonomy.org/
Ok, I will.
Mission accomplished.
Using Reich's astrophysical discoveries as a basis, it is possible to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 4, 2006, at 10:16 PM, new.morning wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
As you know, most
scientists do not accept the existence of a universal life energy!
um a priori? Or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 4, 2006, at 10:16 PM, new.morning wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
As you know, most
scientists do not accept the existence of a universal life energy!
um a priori? Or
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/05/business/05coalfuel.html
The coal in the ground in Illinois alone has more energy than all the
oil in Saudi Arabia. The technology to turn that coal into fuel for
cars, homes and factories is proven. And at current prices, that
process could be at the vanguard
25 matches
Mail list logo
