is there something in the audio/MIDI setup that could be letting this
happen? i get a crash whenever plugging or unplugging a logitech USB
headset (headphones + mic).
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
Don Hart wrote:
Solved with the Update smart word extensions and hyphens feature
in the *utilities menu*! A feature I was unaware of, (new since 2006,
I guess) that seems totally worthy of membership somewhere in the
Lyrics menu. Or so one would think. - DH
I've long ago given up trying
dhbailey wrote:
I've long ago given up trying to decipher any logic in the MakeMusic
placement of menu items.
Should we send a request for editable menu structures, like M$ Word has?
Or can someone write a plugin for it?
___
Finale mailing list
SN jef chippewa wrote:
is there something in the audio/MIDI setup that could be letting this
happen? i get a crash whenever plugging or unplugging a logitech USB
headset (headphones + mic).
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
Barbara Touburg wrote:
dhbailey wrote:
I've long ago given up trying to decipher any logic in the MakeMusic
placement of menu items.
Should we send a request for editable menu structures, like M$ Word has?
Or can someone write a plugin for it?
I doubt a plug-in could change the menu
dhbailey wrote:
It seems as if they've tried to be obtuse. I quite agree that anything
which affects Lyrics should be in the Lyrics menu, but no, if it has
a utilititarian nature, it might go in the Utilities menu, or if you
might happen to use it while editing the score (duh, isn't that
So true, David. Finale's versatility, the main draw for most of its
fans, often get's in its own way. There's always some logic for
various aspects of the user interface. But because we all can, and
probably do, work in very personalized ways with the program, the best
solution for one misses
i am in the midst of doing the parts for an orchestral work and
suddenly certain operations are excessively slow in this particular
document.
i ran TGTools explode parts on several instruments and response to
clearing some measures (selection tool) is now up to 30 secs, but
sometimes (not
, could it be that there are now 125 staves (and growing) in
the document? i discovered that i don't have this prob in page view
or in staff sets (no more than 16 or so staves in each), i seem to
only have the problem in scroll view with all staves showing.
what might be causing
On 7 Mar 2010 at 8:46, dhbailey wrote:
The list goes on and on -- If a person uses a particular
version of Finale a lot, every day, the location of the
menu items doesn't really matter because one quickly becomes
familiar with them all, but for people who use it less
frequently, the
At 7:57 PM +0100 3/7/10, dc wrote:
Which of these two notations is better? Or are they both wrong?
www.collins.lautre.net/files/3voices.jpg
I don't know what's right, but I like the second one better for
reading. Having the two upper voices matched seems to make better
sense than having
On 7 Mar 2010 at 14:11, John Howell wrote:
At 7:57 PM +0100 3/7/10, dc wrote:
Which of these two notations is better? Or are they both wrong?
www.collins.lautre.net/files/3voices.jpg
I don't know what's right, but I like the second one better for
reading. Having the two upper voices
Sounds like an issue with TG Tools, maybe it creates more entries
that slow things up. I would talk to him.
I often get double copies of hairpins and slurs when copying. I don't
know why, but Implode certainly creates 3 hairpins on the resulting
staff when only 2 staves (totalling 2
I can't believe this is the first time I am dealing with this, but it
is the case.
I have Flute 1 and Flute 2 on the same staff in the score, set to use
the TOP note or Layer 1 for Flute 1, and the BOTTOM note or Layer 2
in Flute 2 for the parts.
The problem is the oboe cue. It appears
Bottom one.
Cheers,
- DJA
-
WEB: http://www.secretsocietymusic.org
On 7 Mar 2010, at 1:57 PM, dc wrote:
Which of these two notations is better? Or are they both wrong?
www.collins.lautre.net/files/3voices.jpg
Thanks,
Dennis
___
Hi Chris,
I'm assuming you have the usual settings -- in Edit Voicings:
Flute 1 = Selected Notes From One or More Layer(s); In Measures Containing a
Single Layer Display Top Note; Multiple Layers = Layer 1
Flute 2 = Selected Notes From One or More Layer(s); In Measures Containing a
Single
The white out around fingering on tab doesn't work on the first 3 chords of
a song...the rest are fine. To input or edit these I:
dbl clicked fretboard to get dhord definition menu.
Clicked on edit styles/ fingering numbers/ the white out is set to 0.
Finale screen shows it to be
dc wrote:
Which of these two notations is better? Or are they both wrong?
In my view, neither one is wrong. However, the context within which the
fragments occur might make one a better choice than the other. My
general rule of thumb is that the most critical information should be
Darcy!
Thanks! That was it, I had to NOT have anything in Layer 1. I did go
back and enter whole rests as expressions (auto-placement, gotta love
it!) and I did also have ONE note infringing on a measure with real
notes, but I entered it as an expression and all was well. I could
even
i find in the bottom one, graphically speaking, you don't notice the
displacement as much; in the top you notice it twice very obviously.
it also looks to me like you could shorten the stem of the middle
voice and have almost no (maybe none) horizontal displacement on the
1st beat.
is there a way to freeze the accidentals globally in their current
state so that they show in a transposed part even if finale thinks it
isn't necessary? i tried TGTool shift accis calibrate only / don't
move but that didn't solve this problem.
i have spent lots of time working on a C
There are unfortunately many bugs (not undocumented behaviour, but
just bugs) in dealing with accidentals in non-key-signature parts. I
have come across some passages where it is simply impossible to have
the accidental appear correctly, unless I re-enter the measure and
add accidentals by
There are unfortunately many bugs (not undocumented behaviour, but just bugs)
ok, thanks for letting me know at least.
(BTW, ingenious operation there with the parentheses!)
even more ingenious would be if i ever finish the chart showing how
every pitch step transposes the 1/4 tones with
when working on scores in C, do you find it easier to keep the
instrument in the score as if a C instrument and set the part staff
to transpose? this way you can set up a staff set to simultaneously
see the score (C) and part (transposed) staves for the instrument(s)
while proofing before
24 matches
Mail list logo
