Darcy James Argue schrieb:
In that case, then you are one of maybe three people on the entire
Finale list who is sending properly formatted email messages -- at
least by your definition.
And it actually makes everyone else's life more difficult, unless you
actually want double messages,
David W. Fenton schrieb:
Well, that's their choice, now isn't it?
Why would you want to make life more difficult for Digest readers by
suggesting that no one should bother trimming their quotations?
What does it cost you to agree that cutting quotations to the minimum
is A Good Thing? Or
David W. Fenton wrote
I'd be interested to know if under OS X you guys were stikll finding
RAM disks helpful with pre-2006 Finale. We had a discussion of this a
while back and I can't remember what was concluded. I'd have thought
that OS X's modern industrial-strength virtual memory management
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 10 Aug 2005 at 17:58, Darcy James Argue wrote:
I forgot to add, when addressing someone's question, lots of people
reply to the replies (not the original), so even if the list was
configured to automatically reply-to the individual as well as the
list (which it
What messes me up is coming up on an interesection and seeing..
HERE
STOP
reminds me of lots of WAY - FREE's that I drive on.
--
Rocky Road - in Oz
Fleeing from the Cylon tyranny, the last Battlestar, Galactica,
leads a ragtag, fugitive fleet, on a lonely quest, for a shining
On 10/08/05, Johannes Gebauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Darcy James Argue schrieb:
And it actually makes everyone else's life more difficult, unless you
actually want double messages, so from now on you (not you, Darcy) will
get double messages from me.
Actually, he need not get double
Brad Beyenhof schrieb:
I'm fairly certain that gmail adds a Reply-To header to every email I
send out (and that there's no way to change that), but with avoid
duplicates turned on I never get more than one of each message.
No, mailman is obviously not adding a reply-to header, if I click reply
At 09:41 AM 08/11/2005, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
No, mailman is obviously not adding a reply-to header, if I click reply
to your message only the finale address is put into the To field, not
yours.
Right. Mailman is adding 'Reply-To: finale@shsu.edu'.
With David's emails to the list are
Have figured out how to place the 'fret number'
next to a guitar grid by editing it etc. When I do another chord and put
the number in a different 'vertical' position, it changes all of the fret number
positions to the same as the new one.
Isn't there a way to have each one
separate? Also,
In my message mailman should have read Gmail, I think it is clearer
then. We agree I believe.
Johannes
Aaron Sherber schrieb:
At 09:41 AM 08/11/2005, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
No, mailman is obviously not adding a reply-to header, if I click reply
to your message only the finale address is
At 11:31 AM 08/11/2005, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
In my message mailman should have read Gmail, I think it is clearer
then. We agree I believe.
Ah, yes -- thanks for clarifying.
Aaron.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
Dear Finale list members,
Today Recordare released our Dolet 3 for Finale plug-in. Dolet 3 for
Finale reads and writes MusicXML 1.1 files for better file exchange with
Sibelius, SharpEye Music Reader, and the many other programs that read
and write MusicXML files.
Even if you use the built-in
I haven't done a total lately; however, I believe the DIGEST option is a
70/30 prefernce of listmembers.
As for quoting, I believe cogent, concise quotes will be read more avidly
than full-blown rehashes of conversations.
Shakespeare;-)
Your frindly listowner
Henry Howey
Professor of Music
At 01:31 PM 08/11/2005, Henry E. Howey wrote:
I haven't done a total lately; however, I believe the DIGEST option is a
70/30 prefernce of listmembers.
421 Digest / 362 non-digest
Aaron.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
I just wished Thunderbird would support selective quoting (where you
select something in the original message, click Reply, and only that
portion is quoted at the beginning of the reply message).
Thunderbird is a great email client, but this is a huge step back from
On 11 Aug 2005 at 8:44, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
PS: I am really tired of having to cut out your address from the
replies. So whoseever fault it is, you either have to live with
getting individual replies twice from me, or take out your reply-to
header when you send to the list, to make my
On 11 Aug 2005 at 6:17, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
On 10/08/05, Johannes Gebauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Darcy James Argue schrieb:
And it actually makes everyone else's life more difficult, unless
you actually want double messages, so from now on you (not you,
Darcy) will get double
PS: I am really tired of having to cut out your address from the
replies. So whoseever fault it is, you either have to live with
getting individual replies twice from me, or take out your reply-to
header when you send to the list, to make my life easier.
Take it up with the list owner.
On 11 Aug 2005 at 15:41, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Brad Beyenhof schrieb:
I'm fairly certain that gmail adds a Reply-To header to every email
I send out (and that there's no way to change that), but with avoid
duplicates turned on I never get more than one of each message.
No, mailman is
On 11 Aug 2005 at 13:41, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 01:31 PM 08/11/2005, Henry E. Howey wrote:
I haven't done a total lately; however, I believe the DIGEST option
is a 70/30 prefernce of listmembers.
421 Digest / 362 non-digest
*BOGGLE*
That means that a *majority* of subscribers are on
At 03:29 PM 08/11/2005, David W. Fenton wrote:
Just to clarify: the two addresses are not put there by *me*. When I
send to the list, there's only one address in the Reply-To header, my
own.
Right. As I've explained before, Mailman adds the finale@shsu.edu to
any existing Reply-To header.
I
At 03:27 PM 08/11/2005, David W. Fenton wrote:
I' not sure I quite understand how the list software can address
that, as it isn't processing the header -- the sender's SMTP server
is doing it.
Right. If you have 'avoid' set to Yes, what Mailman does is look to
see if you are explicitly named in
On 11 Aug 2005 at 15:49, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 03:27 PM 08/11/2005, David W. Fenton wrote:
But the problem is not caused by *me* -- it's caused by an incorrect
configuration of the mailing list software.
Well, it's caused by a certain setting in the software which would
arguably be
David W. Fenton schrieb:
That indicates to me that, assuming we all want the list's
subscribers to read our posts, we should all format our posts for
maximum readability on the Digest -- we should all be considering
Digest readers when we post to the list.
Which, of course, noone ever
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz schrieb:
Since I keep a big archive of posts that interest me, here's what I've
found in the 3,009 posts I saved from 2005:
Wow, this is turning into a research project.
Anyway, I feel there is enough justification that those who have
reply-to headers in their mail to
David W. Fenton schrieb:
Take it up with the list owner. I'm not about to change the
configuration of my email client to accommodate a mis-configured
mailing list.
I am not so sure, actually. Isn't the very nature of a reply-to header
that you _want_ it to be replied to? So, unless you want
I guess the firestorm for Finale2006 and GPO has died down, allowing
us a full day to discuss email etiquette!
:-)
Of course, since I'm on the digest, I'm only about 18 hours late to
the party...
Darcy wrote:
What possible advantage does the digest
have over creating a Finale list folder
On 12 Aug 2005 at 0:54, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
David W. Fenton schrieb:
Take it up with the list owner. I'm not about to change the
configuration of my email client to accommodate a mis-configured
mailing list.
I am not so sure, actually. Isn't the very nature of a reply-to
header
On 12 Aug 2005 at 1:01, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz schrieb:
Since I keep a big archive of posts that interest me, here's what
I've found in the 3,009 posts I saved from 2005:
Wow, this is turning into a research project.
Anyway, I feel there is enough justification
On 12 Aug 2005 at 0:56, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
David W. Fenton schrieb:
That indicates to me that, assuming we all want the list's
subscribers to read our posts, we should all format our posts for
maximum readability on the Digest -- we should all be considering
Digest readers when
On 11 Aug 2005 at 19:12, Andrew Levin wrote:
I might very well be in the minority, but it suits me.
As you'll see when you get to today's Digest, you're actually in the
majority of list subscribers.
--
David W. Fentonhttp://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton
On 11/08/05, David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It causes problems in one of two ways:
1. it either inconveniences the people who are paying attention to
remove the extra address when replying, OR
2. it inconveniences the person lists in the Reply-To along with the
list, by causing
David W. Fenton wrote:
[snip]
Well, the lack of effort on the part of many posters in regard to
trimming quotations indicates to me that there was little concern
over the issue.
Darcy's questioning of the utility of the Digest confused me into
thinking that this was also a challenge to the
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 11 Aug 2005 at 19:12, Andrew Levin wrote:
I might very well be in the minority, but it suits me.
As you'll see when you get to today's Digest, you're actually in the
majority of list subscribers.
An interesting point of research would be to see among the top
Does anyone think that's a good idea?
Anyone?
Doesn't affect us, it's your problem. Take it up with the list owner and let's
move onto something more interesting - we're all agreed about quoting aren't we.
Simon Troup
Digital Music Art
___
Finale
On 11 Aug 2005 at 16:42, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
On 11/08/05, David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It causes problems in one of two ways:
1. it either inconveniences the people who are paying attention to
remove the extra address when replying, OR
2. it inconveniences the person
On 11 Aug 2005 at 19:58, dhbailey wrote:
An interesting point of research would be to see among the top 50% of
users, based on activity, what the break-down of digest-vs-individual
would be. I wonder if that would reflect the list's preference as a
whole, or if the bulk of the
On 12 Aug 2005 at 1:06, Simon Troup wrote:
Does anyone think that's a good idea?
Anyone?
Doesn't affect us, it's your problem. Take it up with the list owner
and let's move onto something more interesting - we're all agreed
about quoting aren't we.
Well, given how much difficulty
At 07:26 PM 08/11/2005, David W. Fenton wrote:
The message that has the incorrect Reply-To header is not being sent
by me.
Yes, it is.
My message to the list is correct in having my email address in the
Reply-To field.
Having the same address in a Reply-To header as in your From header
is
At 08:29 PM 08/11/2005, David W. Fenton wrote:
That's not the whole picture. People who include the Reply-To can also
set the list not to send a duplicate message. . . .
No, the list setting only controls duplicated TO: and CC: addresses,
and the problem is *not* a duplicate address -- it's
On 11 Aug 2005 at 20:51, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 07:26 PM 08/11/2005, David W. Fenton wrote:
The message that has the incorrect Reply-To header is not being sent
by me.
Yes, it is.
No, it really isn't. The incorrect Reply-To header is generated by
the mailing list server.
My message
On 11 Aug 2005 at 20:59, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 08:29 PM 08/11/2005, David W. Fenton wrote:
That's not the whole picture. People who include the Reply-To can
also set the list not to send a duplicate message. . . . No,
the list setting only controls duplicated TO: and CC: addresses,
42 matches
Mail list logo
