At 10:44 AM -0400 8/22/07, Stu McIntire wrote:
I would appreciate someone pointing me to a resource that tells how best to
go about getting permission to set a published poem to music, with the
expectation that the resulting piece will be performed and published
eventually, even if just by me.
Christopher Smith wrote:
[snip]
Ah, I see. No, I have put arrows in all kinds of places, and they never
work in EPS export. I haven't exhaustively tested every possible place,
but inside and outside the staff on all four sides makes no difference.
Oh well, it was a guess. Sorry.
--
David
Friends,
I would note that in response to part of what John Howell wrote:
...Anything published after that is probably still under copyright,
meaning that it belongs to the copyright owner, and you must ask
permission to use it, and pay whatever fee or royalty the copyright
owner asks or not
On Aug 22, 2007, at 11:34 PM, Claudio Pompili wrote:
Don't know about FinMac2k8 EPS but I've done a lot of EPS from
Fin2k7c/OSX 10.4.10 to Word 2k4 in last 6 months without any
problems (after I'd done some serious re-organising of all of my
fonts [I use PS Type 1 fonts wherever possible]
At 06:43 AM 8/23/2007 -0600, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
that the word probably may be overstating the case. Items copyrighted
in the U.S. after 1923, and before a date in the mid 1960's (If I
remember correctly, and I don't have time at the moment to be sure that
I do) were copyrighted for a term
On 22 Aug 2007 at 11:58, John Howell wrote:
Anything published before 1923 is in the public
domain (in the U.S.), and may be used freely by anyone. It belongs to
all of us.
What about a public-domain poem published in a critical edition that
is itself under copyright, such as a Norton
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
The 1994 law included restored copyright for many works
in the public domain. It's a minefield for composers.
I concede that the issue of restored copyright has caused problems for
composers, but for the most part, unless one is dealing with material
from the former
custom arrowheads in custom smart lines have not exported properly in
EPS for several versions, at least back to 2005.
--
shirling neueweise ... new music publishers
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :.../ http://newmusicnotation.com
___
Finale mailing
claudio, you don't mention if you were using smart shapes; this is
where the problem is that is being discussed.
Don't know about FinMac2k8 EPS but I've done a lot of EPS from
Fin2k7c/OSX 10.4.10 to Word 2k4 in last 6 months without any problems
--
shirling neueweise ... new music
At 8:08 AM -0400 8/23/07, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 22 Aug 2007 at 11:58, John Howell wrote:
Anything published before 1923 is in the public
domain (in the U.S.), and may be used freely by anyone. It belongs to
all of us.
What about a public-domain poem published in a critical edition
Another version of yesterday's problem. Regarding yesterday, I had to
re-adjust the right system margins page by page, but at least I got things back
to normal. However, if I try to adjust the pages with % Tool the measures of
the final pages again are grossly oversized. I can't seem to find
At 12:57 PM 8/23/2007 -0700, Bruce E. Clausen wrote:
Regarding yesterday, I had to re-adjust the right system
margins page by page, but at least I got things back to
normal. However, if I try to adjust the pages with % Tool
the measures of the final pages again are grossly oversized.
I can't
On Aug 23, 2007, at 3:57 PM, Bruce E. Clausen wrote:
Another version of yesterday's problem. Regarding yesterday, I had
to re-adjust the right system margins page by page, but at least I
got things back to normal.
Ooh, you don't have to do it individually! If you select Adjust
System
On Aug 23, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
The 1994 law included restored copyright for many works in the
public domain. It's a minefield for composers.
I concede that the issue of restored copyright has caused problems
for composers, but for the most
On Aug 23, 2007, at 8:08 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
What about a public-domain poem published in a critical edition that
is itself under copyright, such as a Norton anthology? Is it not the
case that the particular variant spellings and line breaks and so
forth might make it prudent (if not
At 05:11 PM 8/23/2007 -0400, Andrew Stiller wrote:
The one exception would be if
the creator deliberately placed the work in the public domain. That is,
when pigs fly.
Some pigs do fly.
I just saw some of the scores by John Greschak (whose IWBNI site is now
indexed again, by the way, at
On Aug 22, 2007, at 11:58 AM, John Howell wrote:
Anything published after[1923] is probably still under copyright,
meaning that it belongs to the copyright owner, and you must ask
permission to use it, and pay whatever fee or royalty the copyright
owner asks or not use it. You need a
In response to part of what Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote,
The 1994 law included restored copyright for many works in the
public domain. It's a minefield for composers.
I wrote, asserting
I concede that the issue of restored copyright has caused problems
for composers, but for the most part,
I meant, in my post, in reference to the item on the Cornell University
website (cf.
http://www.copyright.cornell.edu/training/copyrightterm.pdf) to
particularly call attention to the fourth line from the bottom of page
1, and to footnote 7 on page 3.
ns
A total of *150* years, no? (80 +70 = 150). And this is provided the
copyright terms are not further extended during the composer's lifetime.
Cheers,
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 23 Aug 2007, at 5:11 PM, Andrew Stiller wrote:
If I had the opportunity to ask one question
Never mind -- I'm an idiot. The song was written when the composer
was *20*, so *60*+70, not 80+70. Writing a hit song before your first
birthday might be a little much for even the most talented of prodigies.
Cheers,
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 23 Aug 2007, at 7:07
Hi, Christopher. I've tried the (Adjust) Edit Systems fix (WinFin06' XP)
you recommended but it has not worked, alas. I've noticed that on the
problem pages the system handles extend well beyond the bottom of the page
to about 32. I can't find a way to click/drag/edit/cajole/threaten the
I just became aware of this:
http://www.forgottenamericanmusic.com/new_fulton_band2.htm
And I think the music is quite delightful. And, despite certain
infelicities, the recordings are quite listenable, even though they
were accomplished with a single sight-reading session for each piece.
At 05:23 PM 8/23/2007 -0600, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
However, this does not appear to be consistent with the infomation
contained on the Cornell University website
Read the actual law, particularly the section that I referenced. That
should make it clear.
The reference to certain foreign works
At 12:02 -0500 23/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Message: 25
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:59:05 +0200
From: shirling neueweise [EMAIL PROTECTED]
claudio, you don't mention if you were using smart shapes; this is
where the problem is that is being discussed.
Yes, the original Fin2k7 file
At 9:17 PM -0400 8/23/07, David W. Fenton wrote:
I just became aware of this:
http://www.forgottenamericanmusic.com/new_fulton_band2.htm
And I think the music is quite delightful. And, despite certain
infelicities, the recordings are quite listenable, even though they
were accomplished with a
John Howell wrote:
At 9:17 PM -0400 8/23/07, David W. Fenton wrote:
I just became aware of this:
http://www.forgottenamericanmusic.com/new_fulton_band2.htm
And I think the music is quite delightful. And, despite certain
infelicities, the recordings are quite listenable, even though they
were
David W. Fenton wrote:
I just became aware of this:
http://www.forgottenamericanmusic.com/new_fulton_band2.htm
And I think the music is quite delightful. And, despite certain
infelicities, the recordings are quite listenable, even though they
were accomplished with a single sight-reading
Hey, John ... could you clue me in as to what site you visited to get
the PDF's? Are they in score format, condensed, or what? I'm
attempting to upgrade my bandstrating skills, and find that score
study is an excellent way to do it, especially if a performance is
available.
Thanks,
At 10:00 PM -0400 8/23/07, Raymond Horton wrote:
The instrumentation difference is not quite as major as you make it
seem, really. Just look at this list from David's link:
---
* Full Score
* (4) C Flute + opt Pic * (1) Eb Clarinet
* (3) 1'st Bb Clarinets
* (3) 2'nd Bb
At 6:47 PM -0700 8/23/07, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Hey, John ... could you clue me in as to what site you visited to
get the PDF's? Are they in score format, condensed, or what? I'm
attempting to upgrade my bandstrating skills, and find that score
study is an excellent way to do it,
Does anybody here have any experience and any in- or out-of-manual wisdom on
chromatic note trees? I played around a little with custom stems but
couldn't quite get them to work?
Aaron J. Rabushka
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://users.waymark.net/arabushk
___
On Aug 23, 2007, at 8:24 PM, Bruce E. Clausen wrote:
Hi, Christopher. I've tried the (Adjust) Edit Systems fix
(WinFin06' XP) you recommended but it has not worked, alas. I've
noticed that on the problem pages the system handles extend well
beyond the bottom of the page to about 32. I
John Howell wrote:
The marches and smears I downloaded have a few more problems. ALWAYS
Db piccolo, and sometimes no C flute parts. Sometimes oboe, sometimes
not, and bassoons likewise. Sometimes no saxes, but other times saxes
including soprano (and never 1st and 2nd alto). And the
This band talk started me doing some surfing, which turned up this quote:
A horse, a dog, a girl, a gun, and music on the side that is my
idea of heaven.
- John Phillip Sousa
It's
Just a comment on the subject of music from this period: there used
to be (now lost) in our school music library, an LP of Sousa marches
directed by some of his family descendants. It was remarkably light
and clear, more transparently orchestrated and played than anything
we hear now. It
Christopher, I just got a bounceback message from the list. The reply with
my file is being held, waiting for approval because of its size. With any
luck, you'll get it tomorrow.
BC
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Thursday,
Thanks, Christopher. I have indeed consulted both the manual and tutorial,
neither of which is a model of clarity. Perhaps this is my problem, more
than theirs. I try not to consult the list without having first done these
things. I am grateful for your help and will review and use your
Thanks, Darcy.
BC
- Original Message -
From: Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] RE: Size
Bruce,
The list doesn't accept attachments. You should send the file to
CHRISTOPHER'S email, not the
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
Read the actual law, particularly the section that I referenced. That
should make it clear.
The reference to certain foreign works is in another section. You want
(a)(1)(A) and (B) and (h)(6)(C)(i).
Section (h) (8) (A) explicitly defines source country for the
Bruce,
The list doesn't accept attachments. You should send the file to
CHRISTOPHER'S email, not the listserv email.
Cheers,
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 23 Aug 2007, at 11:50 PM, Bruce E. Clausen wrote:
Christopher, I just got a bounceback message from the list. The
Bruce...
I've been away from this for a while...did you say you used the % tool to
control view?
In scroll mode?
Jim
From: Bruce E. Clausen
Sent: Fri 24-Aug-07 0:13
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] RE: Size
Thanks, Darcy.
BC
- Original Message -
From: Darcy James
Negative. I've been trying to edit score pages.
BC
- Original Message -
From: Williams, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 9:48 PM
Subject: RE: [Finale] RE: Size
Bruce...
I've been away from this for a while...did you say you used the % tool
43 matches
Mail list logo
