Kim,
You might want to take a look at the RIDIM (Répertoire International
d'Iconographie Musicale) homepage:
http://www.ridim-deutschland.de/
Also some of the volumes of the series Musikgeschichte in Bildern
(VEB Leipzig) are pretty good. I think Bowles has done one of the
volumes.
Eric
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 14 Nov 2008 at 8:28, dc wrote:
[quoting http://www.minkoff-editions.com/musique_musicologie/pages/i-
j.htm]
this collection assembles
in handy volumes, unencumbered by superfluous notes or de luxe
presentation,
I'm always suspicious of people who are suspicous of
Because Dean is capable of doing that without asking on the
list, and Dean asked for opinions, which Robert gave.
Don't you ever ask people who you know have used some
product before you have, whether they are happy with it,
before deciding whether or not you want to investigate
further? I
Well don't expect much when it comes to engraver slur improvements. They only
went after the visual aspect, not REALLY fixing the slurs. So if the slur is
loopy it will really show a loopy slur instead of never knowing until you print
it out or view it from the right view percentage. Lame.
On 14.11.2008 Fiskum, Steve wrote:
Well don't expect much when it comes to engraver slur improvements. They only
went after the visual aspect, not REALLY fixing the slurs. So if the slur is
loopy it will really show a loopy slur instead of never knowing until you print
it out or view it from
On Nov 13, 2008, at 6:49 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
What kind of bounces are these?
From the server to an account. That's why one can't see any
information related to the bounce.
Dick H
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
In the 2009a update they changed the expression behaviour slightly so that
expressions that have to avoid notes do so for layers other than 1. This, in
addition to the knowledge that you can still have an expression stick to the
beat originally assigned by holding down the Opt key when you move
The biggest problem with 09 expressions is that because they are not
note-attached, they do not stay with the notes when you (metrically)
move them. This comes into play most forcefully if you insert a rest
before a note, or if you answer with one of the move options coming
out of speedy with
Hey, Folks... I appreciate all the responses posted to my query.
Actually, I'm a little less concerned with what it (the newest
upgrade) CAN do on the positive side, as opposed to the degree to
which it will present me with hassles compared to my present version.
I would hate to buy it
Another thing to think about...
I haven't tested how TGTools' Smart Distribution of grouped parts or
Smart Explosion of multi-part staves works on 09 but in 08 it is a
disaster. It chokes 95% of the time. It forces me to go section by section
of an entire score (usually in 10 measure increments)
Hi Steve,
I agree this part of TGTools a problem, but you are probably better
off using Linked Parts for this function in Finale 2008 anyway.
Speaking of which, does anyone have any idea if we are ever going to
get a TGTools update for Fin2009? The lack of align-move support keeps
me in
I don't understand how Linked Parts is going to help with this
functionality. It's just not smart enough...at least not as smart as
TGTools...was...
Steve
11/14/08 10:27 AM, Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree this part of TGTools a problem, but you are probably better
off
The big advantage is that it is, well, linked. So it updates live, all
the time, instead of being dependent on explosion. Also, it *works*,
whereas the TGTools function is broken. It's not quite as smart as
TGTools used to be but that point is rather moot since the TGTools
function is not
expressions that have to avoid notes do so for layers other than 1.
but robert sez they are no longer note-attached. how does this work
if they are not note-attached?
This, in addition to the knowledge that you can still have an
expression stick to the beat originally assigned by holding
I got an email from Mr. Tobias and he said in the next few weeks
which was about a week ago or so. So.hopefully before
December?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Darcy James Argue
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Steve,
I agree this part of TGTools a problem, but you are probably better off
They are beat-attached but they also check to see if there are notes
on that beat. If there are, they avoid them.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 14 Nov 2008, at 11:32 AM, shirling neueweise wrote:
expressions that have to avoid notes do so for layers other than 1.
but
On Nov 13, 2008, at 9:58 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Many people try to take the images literally, when they were never
created that way.
James McKinnon, who taught a course on this at SUNY Buffalo back in the
'70s, made the important distinction of realistic, but not real. A
major example
On 14 Nov 2008 at 9:04, dc wrote:
David W. Fenton écrit:
I'm always suspicious of people who are suspicous of notes. Notes
tell us things that we need to know and are usually not superfluous,
except to those who want to remain unencumbered by facts.
The English language is such that
On 14 Nov 2008 at 6:04, dhbailey wrote:
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 14 Nov 2008 at 8:28, dc wrote:
[quoting http://www.minkoff-editions.com/musique_musicologie/pages/i-
j.htm]
this collection assembles
in handy volumes, unencumbered by superfluous notes or de luxe
presentation,
On 14 Nov 2008 at 6:08, Fiskum, Steve wrote:
Well don't expect much when it comes to engraver slur improvements. They
only went after the visual aspect, not REALLY fixing the slurs. So if the
slur is loopy it will really show a loopy slur instead of never knowing
until you print it out or
Hi all,
I thought I might tap the collective expertise of this list on a
different topic.
I have a need for an iPod-like portable music player with the
following requirements:
1. Hard-drive based (not flash)
2. Must support WAV playback
3. Must have a single-track mode, like CD players
4.
On 14 Nov 2008 at 17:32, shirling neueweise wrote:
if you mean moving the expression is now in absolute values instead
of metric placement, it sounds like they have finally implemented
something which should have been done long ago (and was in fact in
sibelius). but that it is no longer
I don't understand what you mean by #3. Do you mean the ability to
repeat a single track indefinitely? The iPod has that. Do you mean the
ability to play a single track once and then stop? The iPod has that,
too. And neither requires setting up each track as its own song.
I also suspect
On 14 Nov 2008 at 21:37, dc wrote:
David W. Fenton écrit:
Prove me wrong, Dennis -- show me that there are notes, and that this
is not an example of commercial promotion (i.e., advertising speak)
at the expense of academic rigor.
Well, I have Edmund Bowles' volume on the Middle Ages.
But
Hi there:
Well the book I have is full of notes with excerpts from diaries or court
accounts of the event shown in the illustrations. Christopher Hogwood wrote
some introductory notes for this vol, and I believe Philip Pickett uses the
chapter on triumphant processions as an source for his
On 14 Nov 2008 at 21:49, dc wrote:
dc écrit:
David W. Fenton écrit:
Prove me wrong, Dennis -- show me that there are notes, and that this
is not an example of commercial promotion (i.e., advertising speak)
at the expense of academic rigor.
Well, I have Edmund Bowles' volume on the Middle
At 03:49 PM 11/14/2008, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Do you mean the
ability to play a single track once and then stop? The iPod has that,
too.
Yes, I do mean that. I have been unable to find this on my Nano 3G,
and I've also seen it discussed elsewhere as a shortcoming of the
iPod. If you have
Hi Aaron,
My apologies -- what I said was incorrect.
My recollection was that if you chose a song from the Song menu
instead of the Album menu, it would stop after one song, but I just
tried that now and it seems I was mistaken. You do actually need to
set up a playlist for each song in
On 14 Nov 2008 at 22:02, dc wrote:
David W. Fenton écrit:
Well, I have Edmund Bowles' volume on the Middle Ages.
But the Minkoff website comment is *not* about that volume, but about
a different one.
Yes it is. It was in the list I sent of the Minkoff series.
OK, I didn't understand
At 04:14 PM 11/14/2008, Darcy James Argue wrote:
My recollection was that if you chose a song from the Song menu
instead of the Album menu, it would stop after one song, but I just
tried that now and it seems I was mistaken. You do actually need to
set up a playlist for each song in order to do
I had an HP Laserjet 5000 and it was a great printer, however it has
died. I have a brand new cartridge for it - the box never opened. It is
a C4129X and the box also says 29x, high volume. I think I paid at least
$150 for it. Since I don't have that printer I have no need for this. I
would
Could someone explain to me how is it possible to have (in linked parts)
unlinked, independent page numbers when the first page of each part begins with
different edit offsets?
In an orchestral work with several movements, one has several files, and from
the second one to on, score and parts
You could create a separate page number field for each part, showing
just that one and hiding all the others -- but that's probably more
trouble than it's worth and I suspect you are better off extracting.
In future, it is almost always best to use a single score file for
multimovement
At 2:03 PM -0500 11/14/08, Andrew Stiller wrote:
James McKinnon, who taught a course on this at SUNY Buffalo back in
the '70s, made the important distinction of realistic, but not
real. A major example of this is a famous painting of St. Cecilia
at the organ, in which the lengths of the
--
From: Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 6:43 AM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Page numbers in linked parts
You could create a separate page number field for each part, showing just
that one
Well, you can very easily convert the WAV file to MP3. Or you can
specify a specific playback reason (for instance, one movement) before
choosing Save As Audio.
Cheers,
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 15 Nov 2008, at 1:45 AM, agil wrote:
36 matches
Mail list logo
