never used 2008, but if there is only one other layer (1?) you can
select "show active layer only" and space.
>Is it possible (Fin2008) to have the music spacing ignore the hidden
>elements in a linked part (hidden notes in layer 2, and hidden lyrics,
>though I think only the former affect the s
ok i was wrong on the last point (deselecting auto-update layout),
applying to a measure/region seems to affect the entire rest of the
SC but not the measures selected in the PT... g.
At 15:53 +0100 3/5/12, SN jef chippewa wrote:
>ok so this has pissed me off more than once, i
Ok. Although I find that update layout cures all manner of other
gremlins and evils too.
Steve P.
On 14 Jan 2011, at 14:30, Richard Yates wrote:
No. Update Layout affects only the width and number of measures in
systems.
It has no effect on relative spacing adjustments inside a measure
(re
You can and should turn on Automatic Update Layout in the Program Options.
Cheers,
- DJA
-
WEB: http://www.secretsocietymusic.org
On 14 Jan 2011, at 5:57 AM, Steve Parker wrote:
> I can't live without an Update Layout every three seconds - Finale behaves
> hideously without it!
___
> Is it 100% correct that it [Update Layout] only changes measure widths?
If "incorporate manual positioning" is checked, then tweaks to spacing
inside a measure are preserved proportionately when Update Layout changes
measure widths.
> Is it possible to lock measure widths?
Not that I know of.
On 14 Jan 2011, at 03:18, SN jef chippewa wrote:
i never use auto-spacing, so maybe i'm not the right person to
comment on this, but doesn't it only affect measures you
"enter" (speedy/simple)? so you could do half a score and adjust
and know that the only changes to what you have already
On 14 Jan 2011, at 00:59, Richard Yates wrote:
You can still use automatic music spacing (for instance in Speedy
Entry or
adding articulations) on later measures without it affecting earlier
spacing
UNTIL you do an Update Layout for the whole document.
I can't live without an Update Layou
i never use auto-spacing, so maybe i'm not the right person to
comment on this, but doesn't it only affect measures you "enter"
(speedy/simple)? so you could do half a score and adjust and know
that the only changes to what you have already adjusted after
auto-spacing is selected would only
You can still use automatic music spacing (for instance in Speedy Entry or
adding articulations) on later measures without it affecting earlier spacing
UNTIL you do an Update Layout for the whole document. If 'incorporate'
manual positioning is checked, the only spacing that will be interfered with
On 2011-01-14 01:38, Steve Parker wrote:
Is it correct then that if I write half a score and move elements around
that I then have no access to automatic music spacing
for the rest of the score unless I'm prepared to have it interfere with
what I've already done?
That's correct.
Best regards
Thanks for reply - this clarifies it.
Is it correct then that if I write half a score and move elements
around that I then have no access to automatic music spacing
for the rest of the score unless I'm prepared to have it interfere
with what I've already done?
Or am I thinking wrong?
Steve
On 2011-01-13 19:24, Steve Parker wrote:
I have music spacing set to 'Incorporate' changes I've manually made.
It seems to ignore some of these - most annoyingly barline moves.
Does anyone know exactly what is incorporated?
I also find that 'update layout' seems to move some things back too.
D
tings
Raimund Lintzen
- Original Message -
From: "Darcy James Argue"
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 9:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] music spacing for expressions in F2k9?
I have never, in all my years using Finale, checked the box for
including expressions in spacing, and I
I have never, in all my years using Finale, checked the box for
including expressions in spacing, and I can't think of a circumstance
where I'd want to. Imagine a measure-long thirty-second-note run
beginning with a "fff" expression -- would anyone seriously entertain
the idea of increasing
On 7 Jun 2009 at 10:08, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> I do find that sometimes crescendos/decrescendos
> sometimes run into the dynamic marking..
Well, has *any* version of Finale taken care of that? I'm way behind,
still using WinFin2003, and I've never had collision avoidance of
that kind. But
That does seem rather stupid of MakeMusic to implement new Expressions
but then not have anyway to avoid collisions of them. Not that that is
a HUGE problem, but I do find that sometimes crescendos/decrescendos
sometimes run into the dynamic marking..
On Jun 7, 2009, at 9:40 AM, David
On 7 Jun 2009 at 11:30, Christopher Smith wrote:
> Because of the new expressions, they aren't attached to items any
> more, so they can't be taken into account for music spacing.
Um...
How in the world can this make for better-looking output? It means
manually spacing everything.
Sibelius j
Hi Raimund,
It doesn't work. They should have removed the option (and have in
2010, by the report they sent) but the option is still there in 2009,
like your appendix; a relic from a previous stage of evolution that
doesn't do anything and even may cause harm.
Because of the new expressio
On Apr 17, 2008, at 7:24 AM, dc wrote:
Christopher Smith écrit:
Copy the measure to a new file. If it spaces correctly, then it is
file corruption and you should take my steps. If it still spaced
incorrectly, then somehow you copied the problem over with the
entries and it is not for sure that
On Apr 17, 2008, at 4:31 AM, dc wrote:
Thanks, Christopher.
Assuming this is happening in a measure with only one layer, then
there is file corruption. Clear the measure stack, delete the measure
stack, then add it back in again and re-enter the notes. If this
doesn't do it, then there will h
On Apr 16, 2008, at 4:25 PM, dc wrote:
I have at least one measure in a score I'm working on where the
music won't space correctly: the accidentals collide with the
preceding notes. It looks like the music spacing is ignoring the
accidentals. I seem to recall someone else had the same prob
> I have at least one measure in a score I'm working on where the
> music won't
> space correctly: the accidentals collide with the preceding
> notes. It looks
> like the music spacing is ignoring the accidentals. I seem to recall
> someone else had the same problem. What is the solution?
>
> Thank
On Sep 20, 2007, at 4:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Finale 2002]
I have a passage with some very short notes at the end of the bar,
which
Finale will not space out adequately (using note spacing the notes get
squashed, time-sig and beat spacing are too wide). I can fix this
problem
by
On Aug 14, 2005, at 2:37 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Finale 2002)
I have been experiencing odd spacing between notes that, so far,
appears to affect a single quaver (eighth note) tied to another note
with stems up. These notes, using “note spacing”, are too far apart.
Michael,
what is the "minimum distance between items" set to?
If you like you can send a file to me personally and tell me where the
problems are, and I will have a look at it tomorrow. It's hard to tell
from the distance.
Johannes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
(Finale 2002)
I have been exper
On 17 Aug 2004, at 03:59 PM, Andrew Stiller wrote:
Hasn't it always been the case that empty measures are spaced
according to either the Spacing Width Table or the Reference Width +
Scaling Factor --...?
- Darcy
I don't even know what those things are. All I know is that in FinMac
2K2 and earli
Hasn't it always been the case that empty measures are spaced
according to either the Spacing Width Table or the Reference Width +
Scaling Factor --...?
- Darcy
I don't even know what those things are. All I know is that in FinMac
2K2 and earlier, if I set my minimum width however low, that's h
Hasn't it always been the case that empty measures are spaced according
to either the Spacing Width Table or the Reference Width + Scaling
Factor -- unless, of course, the minimum measure width is *larger* than
that? I always have my minimum measure width set to zero, but empty
measures in 4/4
28 matches
Mail list logo
