Re: [Fink-devel] PDB pages

2007-01-14 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 13 janv. 2007 à 23:28, Max Horn a écrit :Am 13.01.2007 um 23:01 schrieb Michèle Garoche: Le 13 janv. 2007 à 15:12, Max Horn a écrit : [...] 2) Would somebody mind if I changed the PDB package page (i.e.package.php) to put the description inside a pre field? This way,descriptions that use

Re: [Fink-devel] PDB pages

2007-01-13 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 13 janv. 2007 à 15:12, Max Horn a écrit :Hi,some questions/things:1) I just noticed that http://pdb.finkproject.org/ yields an empty  page. Couldn't this be made to redirect to http:// pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/ ?2) Would somebody mind if I changed the PDB package page (i.e.  package.php) to put

Re: [Fink-devel] fink stats

2007-01-08 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 8 janv. 2007 à 19:20, Robert T Wyatt a écrit :Some of you may have seen this already (looks like fingolfin got involvedwith it at some point). This project describes itself as: Mapping the opensource world by collecting objective???!!! information on open source projects.There is a calculator

[Fink-devel] Cssed in cairo branch

2007-01-02 Thread Michèle Garoche
I've just noticed that cssed in the cairo branch suddenly missed most of its ConfigureParams flags.It would be cool to reintegrate them to avoid me not understanding any more why users complain about cssed not working correctly once the cairo branch is put in fink.Namely:--mandir=%i/share/man

Re: [Fink-devel] Cssed in cairo branch

2007-01-02 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 2 janv. 2007 à 16:14, Benjamin Reed a écrit :-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1Michèle Garoche wrote: I've just noticed that cssed in the cairo branch suddenly missed most ofits ConfigureParams flags.It would be cool to reintegrate them to avoid me not understanding anymore why users

[Fink-devel] Gettext changes?

2007-01-01 Thread Michèle Garoche
I suddenly saw when running glib-gettextize on a package source, the following changes: $(srcdir)/$(GETTEXT_PACKAGE).pot: $(POTFILES) $(XGETTEXT) --default-domain=$(GETTEXT_PACKAGE) --directory=$(top_srcdir) \-   --add-comments --from-code=UTF-8 --keyword=_ --keyword=N_ \+   --add-comments

[Fink-devel] Info3?

2006-12-30 Thread Michèle Garoche
Sorry if my question seems to be trivial. I need an answer first for my own understanding, second for correct translation. I've tried to understand the explanation of Info3 in the packaging manual, but I'm completely at lost with it: quoteCan indent nicely in .info files/quote Anything to

Re: [Fink-devel] Info3?

2006-12-30 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 30 déc. 2006 à 17:59, Martin Costabel a écrit :Michèle Garoche wrote: Sorry if my question seems to be trivial. I need an answer first for my own understanding, second for correct translation. I second your request for explanation. I don't understand the formulations either. And what I seem

Re: [Fink-devel] Info3?

2006-12-30 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 31 déc. 2006 à 00:50, Dave Vasilevsky a écrit :On Dec 30, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Michèle Garoche wrote: Sorry if my question seems to be trivial. I need an answer first for myown understanding, second for correct translation. Sorry for putting new things into Fink without

Re: [Fink-devel] Please use tetex3-base instead of tetex-base (= 3.0-1)

2006-12-25 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 22 déc. 2006 à 14:20, Martin Costabel a écrit :Michèle Garoche wrote:[] The only evidence I have for it is that it worked perfectly two days before the changes, then did not work one day after it. So certainly related to this change, given that I have not updated during this time.And indeed

Re: [Fink-devel] Please use tetex3-base instead of tetex-base (= 3.0-1)

2006-12-22 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 18 déc. 2006 à 00:07, Tomoaki Okayama a écrit : Dear maintainers, I changed Depends: and BuildDepends: fields of following packages: * jadetex.info I'm sorry to inform you that your changes seem to have completely broken html and pdf production of sgml based files at least when

Re: [Fink-devel] Please use tetex3-base instead of tetex-base (= 3.0-1)

2006-12-22 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 22 déc. 2006 à 11:45, Martin Costabel a écrit :Michèle Garoche wrote: Le 18 déc. 2006 à 00:07, Tomoaki Okayama a écrit : Dear maintainers,I changed Depends: and BuildDepends: fields of following packages:* jadetex.info I'm sorry to inform you that your changes seem to have completely broken

Re: [Fink-devel] What feature would you like to see in fink/Fink?

2006-11-27 Thread Michèle Garoche
David H wrote: Dear community. Reading the Wiki we have some very technical ideas on how to improve fink. This thread is meant for you and the quirks you have noticed. For the developers as well as the users. I will try to track all the feature requests that I might see in this thread.

[Fink-devel] dbus mechanism on fink?

2006-11-22 Thread Michèle Garoche
Would it be possible to explain either here or on the wiki, how fink handles the dbus system? And how a maintainer is supposed to make it work within a package which uses it? Cheers, Michèle http://micmacfr.homeunix.org

[Fink-devel] Warning while compiling dbus

2006-11-22 Thread Michèle Garoche
System: Mac OS X 10.4.8 Fink: latest cvs head from today Tree: 10.4 unstable Dbus version: 1.0.1-1021 I wonder if the warnings below are not something to worry about. It occurs during the compilation of D-Bus Glib bindings 0.72. Any idea what to do to get rid of them if possible? Warnings

Re: [Fink-devel] dbus mechanism on fink?

2006-11-22 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 22 nov. 2006 à 14:37, Benjamin Reed a écrit : Michèle Garoche wrote: Would it be possible to explain either here or on the wiki, how fink handles the dbus system? And how a maintainer is supposed to make it work within a package which uses it? I'll try to spend some time updating

[Fink-devel] Deprecated calls in freetype 219

2006-11-15 Thread Michèle Garoche
Fink cvs from yesterdayXCode 2.4.freetype219-2.2.1-2Tree 10.4 unstableWhile compiling freetype219, I've got a number of deprecated calls on 10.4:In file included from

Re: [Fink-devel] Xcode 2.4.1 Build Report

2006-11-08 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 8 nov. 2006 à 19:32, Matthew Sachs a écrit :I did a world build on Intel and PPC with Xcode 2.4.1.  Results look  quite good; there don't appear to be any issues with the new Xcode  version.http://msachs.users.finkproject.org/builds/2006-10-30/ppc/out/ 

[Fink-devel] Anybody interesting in bluefish maintainership?

2006-10-19 Thread Michèle Garoche
I'd like to give bluefish maintainership as the development tree is too complicated for me and requires too much discussions.So, if somebody wants to take it, I'd be pleased.The stable release is OK, only the development tree is problematic. But all future versions will be based upon it, so that

[Fink-devel] Evince zooming in/out degradation

2006-10-13 Thread Michèle Garoche
Hello,Did somebody notice a recent degradation of image rendering inside a pdf when zooming in/out within evince?Latest version of evince in 10.4 unstable, an example of it could be bluefish-doc-pdf, page 41, the black circle and the loose sheet, even at actual size.Or could it be something

Re: [Fink-devel] docbook-dsssl-nwalsh unnecessary rm's in InstallScript

2006-10-12 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 12 oct. 2006 à 20:54, Jesse W a écrit :Jean-François Mertens jfm at core.ucl.ac.be writes: What "coreutils bug" do you mean ? I have coreutils-default installed,and re-checked the build of  docbook-dsssl-nwalsh : everything isperfect.Maybe there was a problem in your build of coreutils ,

Re: [Fink-devel] docbook-dsssl-nwalsh unnecessary rm's inInstallScript

2006-10-11 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 11 oct. 2006 à 07:34, jfmertens a écrit : Michèle Garoche michele.garoche at easyconnect.fr writes: Le 9 oct. 2006 à 23:40, Daniel Macks a écrit : On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 08:44:03PM +0200, Mich?le Garoche wrote: They do something useful, i.e. for example, they remove files which

Re: [Fink-devel] docbook-dsssl-nwalsh unnecessary rm's in InstallScript

2006-10-09 Thread Michèle Garoche
Hello Jesse,Le 9 oct. 2006 à 10:36, Jesse W a écrit :In regards to the fink package docbook-dsssl-nwalsh, to which you are a maintainer, I have a suggestion.In the InstallScript section of the .info file, there are two lines that start: "rm -rf", which remove local directories in the build

Re: [Fink-devel] docbook-dsssl-nwalsh unnecessary rm's in InstallScript

2006-10-09 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 9 oct. 2006 à 20:09, Jesse W a écrit : It works. On Oct 9, 2006, at 2:59 AM, Michèle Garoche wrote: Le 9 oct. 2006 à 10:36, Jesse W a écrit : In regards to the fink package docbook-dsssl-nwalsh, snip This came up due to the package failing to build due to a failure in the second one

Re: [Fink-devel] docbook-dsssl-nwalsh unnecessary rm's in InstallScript

2006-10-09 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 9 oct. 2006 à 23:40, Daniel Macks a écrit :On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 08:44:03PM +0200, Mich?le Garoche wrote: Le 9 oct. 2006 ? 20:09, Jesse W a ?crit : I added /bin/ to all the commands in the InstallScript section, and  it builds fine.  It was a coreutils bug.  Nevertheless, what is the  purpose

[Fink-devel] Updated mozilla, firefox

2006-09-30 Thread Michèle Garoche
While compiling the most recent 10.4 unstable mozilla and firefox, I get lot of warnings of this form:nsCSSPropList.h:400: warning: invalid access to non-static data member 'nsCSSExpandedDataBlock::mMargin' of NULL objectThe nsCSS...:: varying from line to line.While those are just warnings,

Re: [Fink-devel] Updated mozilla, firefox

2006-09-30 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 30 sept. 2006 à 23:05, Jean-François Mertens a écrit :On 30 Sep 2006, at 19:48, Michèle Garoche wrote: While compiling the most recent 10.4 unstable mozilla and firefox, I get lot of warnings of this form:nsCSSPropList.h:400: warning: invalid access to non-static data member

Re: [Fink-devel] Updated mozilla, firefox

2006-09-30 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 30 sept. 2006 à 23:16, Hanspeter Niederstrasser a écrit :Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 30 Sep 2006, at 19:48, Michèle Garoche wrote: While compiling the most recent 10.4 unstable mozilla and firefox,  I get lot of warnings of this form:nsCSSPropList.h:400: warning: invalid access to non

Re: [Fink-devel] Taking over maintainership

2006-09-18 Thread Michèle Garoche
for users if they have a problem with the package. What is the procedure in that case? Le 17 sept. 2006 à 21:02, Benjamin Reed a écrit : Michèle Garoche wrote: I'll make the necessary changes tomorrow if nobody minds. be our guest... and, thanks :) PGP.sig Description: Ceci est une

Re: [Fink-devel] Taking over maintainership

2006-09-18 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 18 sept. 2006 à 11:13, Alexander Hansen a écrit :On 9/18/06, Michèle Garoche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like also to take over the maintainership of docbook-dtd, as I'dbeen maintaining it since beginning of 2005 at expressed maintainer'srequest.The problem is that I cannot ask him right now

[Fink-devel] Taking over maintainership

2006-09-17 Thread Michèle Garoche
Just for the record, from now on I take maintainership of:- really maintained by me since beginning of 2006fopfop-offo-really maintained by me since end of 2004docbook-xsldocbook-dssl-nwalshI'll make the necessary changes tomorrow if nobody minds. Cheers,Michèlehttp://micmacfr.homeunix.org

[Fink-devel] Could pcre be updated?

2006-09-12 Thread Michèle Garoche
Hello,Could pcre be updated to at least version 6.4, better to version 6.7?It has new unicode properties needed for medit I plan to package, if I succeed.Thanks in advance. Cheers,Michèlehttp://micmacfr.homeunix.org 36C471DED4B09EEB30A0281F2608DB2FE6F9E147.gpgkey Description: Binary data

[Fink-devel] Please help testing experimental pstoedit

2006-09-12 Thread Michèle Garoche
Hello,I've put in http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/fink/experimental/michga/ a new version of pstoedit.Could somebody be so kind as to check if it is ok?Thanks in advance, Cheers,Michèlehttp://micmacfr.homeunix.org 36C471DED4B09EEB30A0281F2608DB2FE6F9E147.gpgkey Description: Binary data PGP.sig

Re: [Fink-devel] Could pcre be updated?

2006-09-12 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 12 sept. 2006 à 14:32, Benjamin Reed a écrit :Michèle Garoche wrote: Hello,Could pcre be updated to at least version 6.4, better to version 6.7?It has new unicode properties needed for medit I plan to package, if I succeed. It will take some work, I think; last I saw pcre broke binary

Re: [Fink-devel] Please help testing experimental pstoedit

2006-09-12 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 12 sept. 2006 à 15:52, Alexander Hansen a écrit :On 9/12/06, Michèle Garoche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello,I've put inhttp://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/fink/experimental/michga/a new version of pstoedit.Could somebody be so kind as to check if it is ok?Thanks in advance,Cheers,Michèlehttp

Re: [Fink-devel] Architecture dependent compile options

2006-08-01 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 1 août 2006 à 14:08, Benjamin Prud'homme a écrit :[ "$(uname -p)" = "powerpc" ]; then Does it work if you use:[ "$(uname -p)" == "powerpc" ]; thenNotice the double equality sign. PGP.sig Description: Ceci est une signature électronique PGP

Re: [Fink-devel] Architecture dependent compile options

2006-08-01 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 1 août 2006 à 14:08, Benjamin Prud'homme a écrit : Hi everybody... I'm trying to make a package for e-uae, an amiga emulator (my first fink package)... The problem is that I want to use different compiling options on ppc and x86 architecture... I followed the example given at

Re: [Fink-devel] Hello scientists and students, your input please

2006-06-29 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 26 juin 2006 à 15:18, David H. a écrit : Dear selected community (tricky ehy...) It know that Fink has had a significant impact on the scientific community. There are a couple of packages which are in darwinports but not inf Fink and I would like to get a handle on how popular those

Re: [Fink-devel] Perl interpretter for /sw/bin scripts

2006-06-15 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 15 juin 2006 à 07:27, Daniel Macks a écrit : I just checked my /sw/bin/* files and found that several specify #!/sw/bin/perl as their interpretter but their packages do not specify any Depends:perlXXX. That's bad. This situation often results from a ./configure detecting first 'perl' in

Re: [Fink-devel] patch I found for fop, for Java 1.5

2006-05-31 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 29 mai 2006 à 04:11, Chuck Robey a écrit : I see you're listed as the maintainer for fop, so i will give you my experiences here. I couldn't get fop to build, after repeated tries. The error was listed as about 20 different problems with the sourcce code in fop itself. The first one

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink Build Results

2006-05-31 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 30 mai 2006 à 22:53, Matthew Sachs a écrit : The latest build results, with Xcode 2.3, are up. It looks rather good; much of GNOME and KDE built on both architectures. http://fink.opendarwin.org/build/2006-05-22/i386/out/report.html

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Changes in cssed-filebrowser-plugin

2006-04-25 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 26 avr. 2006 à 03:56, Daniel E. Macks a écrit : Michèle Garoche [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I've just seen your change made in the plugin. [your refers to drm] Could you please tell me which error occurs on Intel architecture for this plugin? gcc -g -O2 -L/sw/lib -o filebrowser.so

[Fink-devel] Changes in cssed-filebrowser-plugin

2006-04-23 Thread Michèle Garoche
I've just seen your change made in the plugin. Could you please tell me which error occurs on Intel architecture for this plugin? Cheers, Michèle http://micmacfr.homeunix.org 36C471DED4B09EEB30A0281F2608DB2FE6F9E147.gpgkey Description: Binary data

Re: [Fink-devel] policy: scrollkeeper files

2006-04-11 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 10 avr. 2006 à 19:27, David R. Morrison a écrit : Dear Fink developers, For some time now, 'fink validate' has attempted to enforce a (poorly-documented) policy about scrollkeeper files: if a scrollkeeper file is present, then the package should depend on scrollkeeper and

Re: [Fink-devel] autogen-dev anyone?

2006-04-09 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 9 avr. 2006 à 09:29, Martin Costabel a écrit : The autogen-dev package installs a file /sw/include/options.h which interferes with the building of a couple of packages that use their own options.h during building. Several packages have noticed this and have BuildConflicts (gcc4, g95),

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: New Build Results

2006-03-29 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 28 mars 2006 à 00:25, Jordan Mantha a écrit : Michèle Garoche wrote: desktop-file-utils - changed since the build Builds fine for me bluefish-gnome2 - changed since the build, reported as building on Intel too now by David R. Morrison Builds fine for me and runs. devhelp - no change

[Fink-devel] xalan-j-docs compilation

2006-03-24 Thread Michèle Garoche
I've put a new info and patch file for xalan-j-docs which compiles in experimental/michga. Could you have a look at it please, since I'm in no way a java expert? Cheers, Michèle http://micmacfr.homeunix.org 36C471DED4B09EEB30A0281F2608DB2FE6F9E147.gpgkey Description: Binary data

Re: [Fink-devel] New Build Results

2006-03-22 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 22 mars 2006 à 05:42, Matthew Sachs a écrit : New buildfink data are up. http://fink.opendarwin.org/build/2006-03-09/ppc/out/report.html http://fink.opendarwin.org/build/2006-03-09/i386/out/report.html desktop-file-utils - changed since the build bluefish-gnome2 - changed since the build,

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.4/stable/main/finkinfo/editors bluefish.info,1.6,1.7 bluefish.patch,1.3,1.4

2006-03-17 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 17 mars 2006 à 22:45, David R. Morrison a écrit : On Mar 17, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Michèle Garoche wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.4/stable/main/finkinfo/editors In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv6436 Modified Files: bluefish.info bluefish.patch Log

[Fink-devel] Could it be another problem with gettext switch?

2006-03-02 Thread Michèle Garoche
I resume here private mails which raise a problem I've never seen before. Dear Michèle, Michèle wrote: Mischa wrote: I have been using glade2 via Fink (on OSX) without experiencing problems. Recently I wanted to run it again and to my surprise the glade2 package has disappeared from my

Re: [Fink-devel] KDE builds on Intel! (mostly)

2006-02-28 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 28 févr. 2006 à 06:15, Dave Vasilevsky a écrit : On Feb 27, 2006, at 9:57 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: The blocker for kdeaccessibility3 is gstreamer (at least) which uses assembly language files for it's x86 build. Unfortunately, Apple's assembler appears to use a different syntax than

Re: [Fink-devel] How to deal with gconf files?

2006-02-26 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 27 févr. 2006 à 01:16, Sebastien Maret a écrit : I am updating the gnucash package in fink, but I don't know how to deal with gconf files. There are two types of files. The first ones are .schema files, that get installed in %i/sw/etc/gconf/schemas. For what i saw in other packages, I think

Re: [Fink-devel] Gettext stable-unstable switching on 10.4 tree

2006-02-25 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 25 févr. 2006 à 17:23, David R. Morrison a écrit : On Feb 25, 2006, at 8:14 AM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: On Feb 25, 2006, at 9:48 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: However, there are some pairs of packages (dclib0 and valknut come to mind) which have been set up so that one depends on a

Re: [Fink-devel] libgnomeprint2.2-2.12.1-1001

2006-02-24 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 24 févr. 2006 à 09:08, Daniel Macks a écrit : On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 08:39:00AM +0100, Mich?le Garoche wrote: Le 24 f?vr. 2006 ? 06:26, Daniel Johnson a ?crit : Anyway, the brand new libgnomeprint2.2-2.12.1-1001 package requires a BuildDepends on bison. It fails to build with the

Re: [Fink-devel] libgnomeprint2.2-2.12.1-1001

2006-02-24 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 24 févr. 2006 à 09:53, Daniel Macks a écrit : But seriously, we can't require of ourselves a higher level of quality than the uptream authors I think the contrary, if obviously a package does not work properly, either it has not to be put in fink and bug reported to gnome, or it has to

Re: [Fink-devel] libgnomeprint2.2-2.12.1-1001

2006-02-24 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 24 févr. 2006 à 11:18, Daniel Macks a écrit : . It seems unlikely that an upstream package would have gone through a whole unstable branch series then a new stable series and have serious upgrade breakage or interface incompatibilities. So if they say it's compatible, it's been tested by

[Fink-devel] Gettext stable-unstable switching on 10.4 tree

2006-02-24 Thread Michèle Garoche
Just for the record if it matters. I've bootstrapped from HEAD in a new empty directory; bootstrapped was fine: it installed gettext and its dependencies at version 0.10.40-19 on stable branch. Then I've switched to unstable, removing stable directories in fink.conf Trees line. Then

Re: [Fink-devel] Gettext stable-unstable switching on 10.4 tree

2006-02-24 Thread Michèle Garoche
Hi David, Le 24 févr. 2006 à 16:27, David R. Morrison a écrit : Hi Michèle. I've seen things like this before. This kind of upgrade issue is exactly why I haven't moved libgettext3 to stable. We need to have a strategy for avoiding any issues with users who upgrade to libgettext3.

Re: [Fink-devel] Gettext stable-unstable switching on 10.4 tree

2006-02-24 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 24 févr. 2006 à 16:49, Chris Zubrzycki a écrit : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Feb 24, 2006, at 10:27 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: Hi Michèle. I've seen things like this before. This kind of upgrade issue is exactly why I haven't moved libgettext3 to stable. We

Re: [Fink-devel] gstreamer 10.4 (non-transitional) compile problem

2006-02-24 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 24 févr. 2006 à 20:59, William Scott a écrit : Using stylesheet: /sw/share/sgml/docbook/utils-0.6.14/docbook- utils.dsl#print Working on: /sw/src/fink.build/gstreamer-0.8.12-1021/ gstreamer-0.8.12/docs/faq/build/faq.xml openjade:E: cannot open /sw/share/sgml/xml.dcl (No such file or

Re: [Fink-devel] gstreamer 10.4 (non-transitional) compile problem

2006-02-24 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 24 févr. 2006 à 22:52, William Scott a écrit : I manually copied the file to the wrong location, and then it compiles, but I think the package needs to be fixed. May it would be better to change gstreamer info file or configuration, though That's what I was suggesting. (It isn't

Re: [Fink-devel] gstreamer 10.4 (non-transitional) compile problem

2006-02-24 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 24 févr. 2006 à 22:52, William Scott a écrit : I manually copied the file to the wrong location, and then it compiles, but I think the package needs to be fixed. May it would be better to change gstreamer info file or configuration, though That's what I was suggesting. (It isn't

Re: [Fink-devel] libgnomeprint2.2-2.12.1-1001

2006-02-23 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 24 févr. 2006 à 06:26, Daniel Johnson a écrit : It's me again. And no I'm not looking to take over Gnome. :-) Anyway, the brand new libgnomeprint2.2-2.12.1-1001 package requires a BuildDepends on bison. It fails to build with the system's version. I assume the same is also true in the

Re: [Fink-devel] Some multiple symbols when compiling aspell

2006-02-21 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 21 févr. 2006 à 09:41, Martin Costabel a écrit : Peter O'Gorman wrote: [] When gnu libtool sees an empty whole_archive_flag_spec it will unpack the archives and add the objects to the link line. The above solution is easier than updating the package to the newest libtool (which has an

Re: [Fink-devel] Some multiple symbols when compiling aspell

2006-02-21 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 21 févr. 2006 à 10:29, Martin Costabel a écrit : Michèle Garoche wrote: [] May I commit the change now? I mean this is not very useful that I have it only in my local tree. BTW, the checking dependency style of g++... gcc3 that irritates you goes away if you add the configure flag

[Fink-devel] Strange version-revision numbering in libncurses5 on 10.4 stable

2006-02-21 Thread Michèle Garoche
I'm a bit confused by the version-revision number for libncurses5 on 10.4. They do not seem to exist in any tree. Context: I bootstrapped from HEAD in a new empty directory. Trying to see what needs to eventually be done on cssed-vte-plugin, I discovered that the version-revision numbers of

Re: [Fink-devel] Strange version-revision numbering in libncurses5 on 10.4 stable

2006-02-21 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 21 févr. 2006 à 16:56, David R. Morrison a écrit : On Feb 21, 2006, at 3:12 AM, Michèle Garoche wrote: Could somebody please enlighten me: 1 - Is there something wrong in the 10.4 tree as far as version- revision schemes of libncurses5, libncursesw5 are concerned? I will look

Re: [Fink-devel] CVS chill over

2006-02-20 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 18 févr. 2006 à 20:25, David R. Morrison a écrit : On Jan 20, 2006, at 9:44 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: I am imposing a chill on CVS, for the 10.4-transitional tree (both stable and unstable). During the chill, I ask that people only make urgent commits, and that they try to avoid

Re: [Fink-devel] New package bluefish-unstable

2006-02-14 Thread Michèle Garoche
Hello baba,Le 15 févr. 2006 à 02:36, BABA Yoshihiko a écrit :Michèle 2006/2/11, Michèle Garoche [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As there is a chill in Fink trees, I've put  there:http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/fink/experimental/michga/new info file for bluefish-unstable: bluefish-unstable.info (should

[Fink-devel] New package bluefish-unstable

2006-02-10 Thread Michèle Garoche
As there is a chill in Fink trees, I've put there: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/fink/experimental/michga/ new info file for bluefish-unstable: bluefish-unstable.info (should be revision 1.1 on the site) It is the future of bluefish. If you want to influence or participate in its

[Fink-devel] New revision of bluefish

2006-02-10 Thread Michèle Garoche
As there is a chill in Fink trees, I've put there: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/fink/experimental/michga/ new info and patch files for bluefish: bluefish.info (should be revision 1.28 on the site) bluefish.patch (should be revision 1.5 on the site) It corrects an unstability when

[Fink-devel] New bluefish upstream version info files for 10.4-transitional unstable

2006-02-05 Thread Michèle Garoche
For those of you who are using the 10.4-transitional unstable tree and compile from source. As there is a chill at the moment, hence not possible to put the info files in the tree, the new bluefish.info file is located at: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/fink/experimental/michga/ It

Re: [Fink-devel] New Build Report

2006-02-01 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 31 janv. 2006 à 22:56, Matthew Sachs a écrit : My latest build report, using package definitions from 2006-01-17, is at: http://fink.opendarwin.org/build/2006-01-17/ppc/out/report.html http://fink.opendarwin.org/build/2006-01-17/i386/out/report.html Note that the Intel

Re: [Fink-devel] phase compiling: gnome-libs-1.4.2-53 failed

2006-01-22 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 21 janv. 2006 à 22:30, Neil Tiffin a écrit :Mac OS X 10.4.4 and xCode 2.2Component versionsXcode IDE: 655.0Xcode Core: 658.0ToolSupport: 651.0On Jan 21, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Neil Tiffin wrote: Has anyone else experienced this failure?  It has persisted for at least a week and probably more.In file

[Fink-devel] galeon on 10.3 unstable tree fails to compile

2006-01-16 Thread Michèle Garoche
Back in March 2005 and May 2005 it was reported that galeon does not compile on 10.3 unstable tree. The situation has not changed so far. Could it be made so that it compiles.? Amicalement, Michèle http://micmacfr.homeunix.org ---

[Fink-devel] Is python24-socket-ssl right?

2006-01-16 Thread Michèle Garoche
I just wonder if building python24-socket-ssl as it is in 10.4- transitional unstable is right: It depends on python2.4 which is at version 2.4.2 hence downloading the 2.4.2 source. But its version is 2.4, which means that it downloads the 2.4 source, not the same as 2.4.2 source. And it

Re: [Fink-devel] Take over pcre?

2006-01-16 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 17 janv. 2006 à 02:13, Daniel Johnson a écrit : On Jan 16, 2006, at 7:32 PM, TheSin wrote: just make sure it doesn't break apache2 please or php4/5 since I know the pcre stuff is odd in those. --- TS http://southofheaven.org/ Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.

Re: [Fink-devel] CVS freeze coming

2006-01-15 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 16 janv. 2006 à 00:06, David R. Morrison a écrit : I intend to declare a CVS freeze for both 10.4-transitional/ unstable and 10.4-transitional/stable, sometime within the next week. Once the freeze is implemented, it will be in effect for at least several days, possibly longer, as I

[Fink-devel] Need help with python linking

2006-01-03 Thread Michèle Garoche
Hello, Would somebody know how to make the system find the right python framework in the case explained below: It is with Mac OS X 10.4.3, XCode 2.2, latest libtool in fink 10.4- transitional unstable The configure.ac file is as follows: AC_ARG_ENABLE(python,

Re: [Fink-devel] Need help to compile plugins

2005-12-28 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 27 déc. 2005 à 14:52, Martin Costabel a écrit : Michèle Garoche wrote: I try to compile a package which constructs three plugins during the compilation. [] $(PLUGIN): $(OBJECTS) $(LIBTOOL) --mode=link $(CC) -module $(LIBS) -shared -o $@ $ (LOBJECTS) What happens if you remove

Re: [Fink-devel] Need help to compile plugins

2005-12-28 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 28 déc. 2005 à 10:27, Martin Costabel a écrit : Michèle Garoche wrote: Le 27 déc. 2005 à 14:52, Martin Costabel a écrit : [] What happens if you remove the -shared from this line? It does not change anything, apart that it does not tell that - shared is undefined of course. Libtool

[Fink-devel] Need help to compile plugins

2005-12-27 Thread Michèle Garoche
I try to compile a package which constructs three plugins during the compilation. An example of a typical Makefile.in for the plugin is: PLUGIN=about.so PLUGINDIR=${pkglibdir} OBJECTS= about.o LOBJECTS = $(OBJECTS:.o=.lo) $(PLUGIN): $(OBJECTS) $(LIBTOOL) --mode=link $(CC) -module

[Fink-devel] Wrong location of doc for make-3.79.1

2005-12-16 Thread Michèle Garoche
Hello, Back in May I reported that the location of documentation for the package make-3.79.1 is wrong, as it installs directly under prefix/ share. Could it be possible to change it, as it is already patched in the Makefile.in as an addition, to make it compliant with the Fink policy

Re: [Fink-devel] problems with bluefish variants

2005-12-15 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 15 déc. 2005 à 14:29, Benjamin Reed a écrit : The variants are causing double-dependencies of (at the very least) libbonobo2 and it's freaking fink out: Failed: Internal error: node for libbonobo2-dev already exists The problem is that if you end up with -gnome2-gnomevfs2, you have

[Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] OpenOffice build failure

2005-07-10 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 10 juil. 2005 à 06:57, Mark Moorcroft a écrit : Tiger 10.4.1 XCode 2.1 In file included from ../../../../dist/private/nss/nsspki1.h:57, from nsspki.h:56, from asymmkey.c:39: ../../../../dist/private/nss/oiddata.h:46: error: array type has incomplete

Re: [Fink-devel] Add third tree?

2005-07-02 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 2 juil. 2005 à 22:24, Matthew Sachs a écrit : On Jul 2, 2005, at 07:26, Peter O'Gorman wrote: I agree with you. Well, almost :). We need a way to validate package submissions, and build them automatically. If the validation and building go ~ okay then they go into this new tree. From

Re: [Fink-devel] Add third tree?

2005-07-02 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 3 juil. 2005 à 00:22, Nigel Stanger a écrit : On 3/7/2005 9:05 AM, Michèle Garoche at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thus: 3 - A package foo at version x compiles, but it is desirable that the same package foo exists also at version x-1, because otherwise other packages would not compile

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Add third tree?

2005-07-02 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 3 juil. 2005 à 01:20, David H. a écrit : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Sachs wrote: On Jul 2, 2005, at 07:26, Peter O'Gorman wrote: snip Apart from all this, will Apple gift us the necessary infrastructure to do this? I doubt it. That means we will have to

Re: [Fink-devel] Help needed with g++ handling

2005-06-29 Thread Michèle Garoche
Hi Dave, Le 28 juin 2005 à 13:08, Dave Vasilevsky a écrit : Hi Michèle, It seems you're a bit confused, understandable given the GCC situation. Hopefully this mail can make things clearer, it's a bit long so I've written it in sections. Also, you may want to read the new section in the

Re: [Fink-devel] Help needed with g++ handling

2005-06-29 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 29 juin 2005 à 19:31, Dave Vasilevsky a écrit : Hi Michèle, I'm glad my email was helpful to you. The SetCXX: c++ and SetCC: cc that you used in cssed accomplish nothing, but they're also harmless. So you can leave them in or remove them, it's up to you. So, it was here till the

[Fink-devel] Help needed with g++ handling

2005-06-27 Thread Michèle Garoche
First, for those who were on the channel, I apologize for having ranted, but well not fun to waste my time with this and not being able to come to a solution. Here's the culprit: cssed in section editors. A - Current situation 1 - It is written mainly in C, but builds a private C++

Re: [Fink-devel] Which package supplies gnome-config?

2005-06-16 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 17 juin 2005 03:55, Kevin Horton a crit : I'm working on a new fink package, and it needs gnome-config. I don't currently have gnome-config on my system. I've tried installing a few gnome-related packages, but I haven't found gnome- config yet. How do I determine which package

Re: [Fink-devel] Which package supplies gnome-config?

2005-06-16 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 17 juin 2005 04:43, Peter O'Gorman a crit : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michle Garoche wrote: | | Le 17 juin 2005 03:55, Kevin Horton a crit : | | I'm working on a new fink package, and it needs gnome-config. I | don't currently have gnome-config on my system. I've

Re: [Fink-devel] Web site: How to use 'include' correctly

2005-06-13 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 14 juin 2005 à 02:50, BABA Yoshihiko a écrit : 2005/6/13, Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED]: That works fine as long as the CWD is set to the right location. Often, it isn't, leading to nasty PHP errors messages visible to visitors of our web site. With the PDB, this was very visible, I

[Fink-devel] broken-server with libbonobo2

2005-06-12 Thread Michèle Garoche
Mac OS X Tiger, fink latest cvs, 10.4-transitional unstable, after a cleanfink (that is there is nothing left in tree except essential packages). libbonobo2 installs a broken-server in /sw/lib/bonobo2/servers which generates warning in system.log. It seems that this server should not be

Re: [Fink-devel] fink rebuild when no binary present

2005-06-07 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 7 juin 2005 à 22:57, Daniel E. Macks a écrit : Fink was recently patched so that any fink reinstall of a package whose binary does not exist is automatically upgraded to a fink rebuild (a mode that always concludes by reinstalling). Without this, users have observed that fink will crash,

[Fink-devel] Problem with an unknown package

2005-06-03 Thread Michèle Garoche
Sorry to cross-post but I'm unable to find to which package this problem belongs.After having done a buildfink, cancelled it because it took too many days and followed it by a cleanfink, I got this message:Purge des fichiers de configuration de io-tty-pm581 ...dpkg : avertissement : lors de la

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Re: Tiger build report

2005-06-02 Thread Michèle Garoche
Hi Jean-François, Le 2 juin 2005 à 23:28, Jean-François Mertens a écrit : You may want to try the new upstream version. They'll be in experimental/michga as soon as it synchronizes, meanwhile they are here. It works for me with 10.4.1 (that is it compiles and it works on a real example), tetex

Re: [Fink-devel] installer testing again

2005-06-02 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 3 juin 2005 à 02:19, David R. Morrison a écrit : The test versions of the installer have been revised, and I'd appreciate testing reports. http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/Fink-0.7.2-Installer.dmg http://www.cgtp.duke.edu/~drm/Fink-0.8.0-Installer.dmg Could you elaborate what do you mean by

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink Build Status; QA Proposal

2005-05-31 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 1 juin 2005 à 06:52, Dave Vasilevsky a écrit :On May 31, 2005, at 10:55 PM, Michèle Garoche wrote:Le 31 mai 2005 à 23:48, Matthew Sachs a écrit :The second build will use 10.4-transitional and not try to force 4.0, and will build the packages as 'nobody' instead of 'root'.That would be good

  1   2   3   >