Re: [Fink-devel] db41-ssl and db42-ssl on 10.2-gcc missing system-java14-dev

2003-11-26 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Update? | Or, if you want to wait 24 hours, I'll have fixed the db packages to not require java and make the java bindings a completely separate build (then pure darwin users can build bdb too, and it will not require most users to get the java sdk). Peter - -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com

Re: [Fink-devel] Stripping libraries

2003-11-25 Thread Peter O'Gorman
don't believe that we have come near the point of running out of space yet. So, forget about it :) Peter - -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE

Re: [Fink-devel] Shared Headers support?

2003-11-25 Thread Peter O'Gorman
with this system, and fink would take care of the rest? I'd like to see/try the fink patch :) Peter - -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE

Re: [Fink-devel] Library sclerosis

2003-11-23 Thread Peter O'Gorman
. It seems likely that the output of the prebinding tool is being set to the install_name. Especially as diff/cmp tell me that the 2 files differ. Ben Reed has done all the fink-prebinding work, so we'll have to ask him when he gets up. Peter - -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com -BEGIN PGP

Re: [Fink-devel] Stripping libraries

2003-11-23 Thread Peter O'Gorman
- -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/wLG+hJEqt987YAQRAsxAAJ96A7EjeTaNzDPUNQsuzTKq+sahJwCeM2M0 IlrjT3S4oz8Luj8idsSo22U= =H/6Z -END PGP SIGNATURE

Re: [Fink-devel] Stripping libraries

2003-11-23 Thread Peter O'Gorman
and ask users to set DYLD_IMAGE_SUFFIX to get a decent backtrace. Anyway, I'm full of bright ideas, but no numbers, so I'll go get some numbers later today. Thanks, Peter - -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG

Re: [Fink-devel] Stripping libraries

2003-11-22 Thread Peter O'Gorman
. Peter - -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/v/mthJEqt987YAQRAnCWAKCp3Xj3GlTz1WUtIUdtcU+fh8TCXgCfatkr mfcJ+W2dCkDTmt46IDnp80w= =4N1/ -END PGP SIGNATURE

[Fink-devel] Re: fink-virtual-pkgs.in

2003-11-21 Thread Peter O'Gorman
at compile time so this: if( ... ) { use Foo; } is really this: use Foo; if( ... ) { } This means POSIX was always being loaded and $basepath/lib/perl5 always being added to @INC. Thanks for this. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com

Re: [Fink-devel] Don't disable tests. Report the failure. (was Re: fink ChangeLog,1.181,1.182 Makefile,1.4,1.5)

2003-11-20 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Benjamin Reed wrote: Uninstalling the original version in 5.6.0 is against Fink policy though. Shouldn't it still be finding ours first if we're setting PERL5LIB? I don't know the exact problem here, but from a clean bootstrap we do not set PERL5LIB. The failures weren't from bootstrap

Re: [Fink-devel] -release to -version-info conversion

2003-11-19 Thread Peter O'Gorman
this? Peter - -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/u4PBhJEqt987YAQRAgFkAJ9PWOfaiukscqHsWqaq+ycr/FG6wACgg9VW sCZb+IU6+1TnsCDz9qZl2Dk= =8eU0 -END PGP SIGNATURE

Re: [Fink-devel] -release to -version-info conversion

2003-11-19 Thread Peter O'Gorman
TheSin wrote: further more, on the fink site! http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/porting/libtool.php#dylibversionfix Can you point me at the libtool docs/code which say -release is deprecated please? Just because it is on the fink web site doesn't necessarily mean it is correct :-p Peter

Re: [Fink-devel] no system-xfree86-* in the 10.3 tree??

2003-11-18 Thread Peter O'Gorman
- -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/uhwxhJEqt987YAQRAkVqAKCmHc0Ne1VgUgP/zlz4/41oOqqUewCgnzXP yVofU6SwYvjqftiHowICAyQ= =tVtx -END PGP SIGNATURE

Re: [Fink-devel] no system-xfree86-* in the 10.3 tree??

2003-11-18 Thread Peter O'Gorman
And when you run fink list system-xfree86 after that it should properly detect the one you've got. Peter - -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE

Re: [Fink-devel] -release to -version-info conversion

2003-11-18 Thread Peter O'Gorman
may or may not break backward/forward binary compatibility by arbitrarily changing packages like this. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you

Re: [Fink-devel] trailing slashes

2003-11-14 Thread Peter O'Gorman
, except his rename(2) call failed wile mine worked. I'm pretty confused too. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: plea for more care

2003-11-12 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Peter O'Gorman wrote: I could make a hand-written .la and put it into the 10.3 freetype2 with a libfreetype.dylib symlink to /usr/X11R6/lib/libfreetype.6.dylib that would likely solve the problem actually. Hmm. I'll have to check into that this weekend. On second thought, that won't work either

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: plea for more care

2003-11-11 Thread Peter O'Gorman
in dependency_libs in the .la files). Peter -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL

Re: [Fink-devel] glib2-dev version?

2003-11-06 Thread Peter O'Gorman
or the stable version changed. Thanks, Peter -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink module documentation, tests and all that icky stuff.

2003-10-30 Thread Peter O'Gorman
D. Höhn wrote: If you would like to continue this important work, I would be more than happy to setup a roadmap of your goals and sync them with the Fink team, being your proxy. As Mister Reed said, we are very interested in additional patches to further improve fink and I am sure that you

Re: [Fink-devel] unlimit stack

2003-10-28 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Koen van der Drift wrote: Hi, Two of the programs of the emboss package do not work on Mac OS X apparently because of the limited stacksize on Mac OS X. For instance, if I type just 'cirdna' at the prompt, I get an segmentation fault. However if I type 'unlimit stack' first, the program works

Re: [Fink-devel] ANNOUNCE: Rsync update method for fink info files

2003-10-14 Thread Peter O'Gorman
, oddly enough). Mea culpa-- I probably should have looked at the source code before trying selfupdate-rsync :-/ We simply never considered this possibility, sorry. I'll look at changing it to leave non-fink distribution CVS dirs alone when I get a chance. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman - http

Re: [Fink-devel] rsync vs. cvs

2003-10-02 Thread Peter O'Gorman
David R. Morrison wrote: The simplest thing to do is to simply add this as an alternative method. But we were just discussing on #fink a more drastic change: we could scrap anonymous cvs access altogether, and offer only two access methods, rsync or ext cvs (the latter for fink developers only).

Re: [Fink-devel] new virtual provider for X11

2003-09-08 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Monday, September 8, 2003, at 9:46 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: push(@provides, 'fontconfig1')if (readlink('/usr/X11R6/lib/libfontconfig.dylib') =~ /libfontconfig\.1/ and There is no libfontconfig in this version of X11. Oops, might want to check for the file existing before doing a

Re: [Fink-devel] Please confirm these md5 sums

2003-09-01 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Monday, September 1, 2003, at 11:02 PM, jfm wrote: I get _ with 'md5sum -c' : Thank you, Peter --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___

Re: [Fink-devel] Please confirm these md5 sums

2003-09-01 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Hi, Okay, except for the checksums which failed to confirm for Jean-Francois, I have added a whole bunch to unstable, some of them unconfirmed, these may or may not fail, who knows, give me more confirmations please :) The following packages still have no checksums in unstable: Chris

[Fink-devel] Please confirm these md5 sums

2003-08-30 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Hi, The following source files I just fetched/refeched. These sources (some of which went through SourceRename) are from packages in the unstable tree which do not have a SourceN-Md5 field for the associated SourceN field. I am hoping for confirmation that these md5's are valid from people who

[Fink-devel] missing md5 sums to become an install time error

2003-08-29 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Hi, I'm considering changing fink so that when the user does fink install foo and foo has no Source-MD5 field, or the field is empty, it will print the warning asking the user what to do (similar to the warning currently printed when the md5 in the info file and the tarball differ). Are we

Re: [Fink-devel] missing md5 sums to become an install time error

2003-08-29 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Friday, August 29, 2003, at 11:41 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Hi Peter. This one should be structured as a warning to developers, not to users (similar to the duplicate fields warning). In fact, there is already a warning if you do fink fetch foo and foo has no MD5-sum. Okay, thought the

Re: [Fink-devel] pkgconfig policy

2003-08-28 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Thursday, August 28, 2003, at 10:31 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: Peter O'Gorman wrote: I don't see the need for this to be in a Recommends field, would it not be better in a Desc* type field, or simply as a #comment in the .info file? It's not a matter of need, but it does make sense to me

Re: [Fink-devel] Libtool not finding libgnomevfs-2

2003-08-20 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Wednesday, August 20, 2003, at 08:30 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: 'autoreconf -f' (from autoconf2.5 (2.57-1)). I see no warnings or errors during ./configure or make, until: /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -g -L/sw/lib -o gael -export-dynamic main.o -L/sw/lib -lgnomevfs-2 gcc -g

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging question

2003-08-18 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Tuesday, August 19, 2003, at 05:58 AM, Joe Block wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am creating a package for python23 docs, and have run into the problem that the tar file is named html-2.3.tar.bz, but expands into a directory tree named Python-Docs-2.3. It was easy

Re: [Fink-devel] Bus error on Mac OSX, again (long)

2003-08-01 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Saturday, August 2, 2003, at 06:36 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Peter O'Gorman wrote: I'd guess that there is a static constructor somewhere in one of the other objects which gets called before main() and does something odd You had the right idea: As it turns out, the crash does not happen

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3 IDEAS,NONE,1.1 TODO,1.3,NONE

2003-06-30 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Monday, June 30, 2003, at 01:23 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: I'm still a bit unclear about what your change would accomplish, Peter. BuildDepends is not passed to dpkg. We use that only within Fink. As you suggest, when the shared libraries plan is fully implemented, we'll only have to

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3 IDEAS,NONE,1.1 TODO,1.3,NONE

2003-06-30 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Tuesday, July 1, 2003, at 03:07 AM, TheSin wrote: this is indeed not true, I just tried it. On Monday, June 30, 2003, at 11:18 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: If you do fink build foo then indeed foo-shlibs gets installed. In that case, please feel free to beat me around the head with a wet

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3 IDEAS,NONE,1.1 TODO,1.3,NONE

2003-06-29 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Sunday, June 29, 2003, at 03:18 PM, Max Horn wrote: As for 2, we will need to otool everything we are putting into the 10.3 tree to check the depends, seems fair enough, I'd also like to suggest changing the BuildDepends lines and fink so it does not add Depends at build time. Everything

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3 IDEAS,NONE,1.1 TODO,1.3,NONE

2003-06-28 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Sunday, June 29, 2003, at 05:14 AM, Max Horn wrote: --- NEW FILE: IDEAS --- - decide on setting MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET to 10.3 or not - all pkgs that need a depend on essential pkgs should list that depend - all pkgs that depend on ncurses will need a versioned dep as this version is bin

Re: [Fink-devel] linc1 doesn't compile

2003-06-24 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Wednesday, June 25, 2003, at 09:10 AM, Thomas Kotzian wrote: linc1 can't find a file during install phase. the maintainer doesn't respond after a few weeks so i write to the mailing-list. here's the output: Thomas, Update your opensp3 and openjade packages, it should then work. Peter

[Fink-devel] first draft of gnu libtool notes

2003-06-22 Thread Peter O'Gorman
I am working on some gnu libtool notes, here is a first and very rough draft. Peter Problem: libtool always links against the installed library, not the one it just built. Solution: On some older versions of libtool the var hardcode_direct is set to yes. If you patch configure to change this

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool 1.4

2003-05-29 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Thursday, May 29, 2003, at 09:21 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: What is the point of LibTool in Fink, Mac OS X include version 1.4.2 from glibtool --version: ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.4.2 (1.4 2001/11/19 00:06:02) Sure, and now libtool is up to 1.5 . The newer versions have a lot of Darwin/Mac

Re: [Fink-devel] Dante...

2003-04-06 Thread Peter O'Gorman
David, You do not show the link command in this mail, but I am betting a couple of libtool patches fromt he porting page would make them go away. Looks like the convenience library bug to me :-) Peter On Sunday, April 6, 2003, at 11:27 PM, David wrote: ld: multiple definitions of symbol

Re: [Fink-devel] python modules do not comply with policy

2003-04-03 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 04:29 PM, Rohan Lloyd wrote: It works pretty well for emacs, What do you think? Although I quite like this idea, what about compiled C python modules, the binaries are not compatible across python versions? Peter

Re: [Fink-devel] python modules do not comply with policy

2003-04-03 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 10:57 PM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: So, I'll create numeric-py22 and pil-py22 packages ASAP and put them in experimental/jswhit. If you were here, I'd kiss you :-) Thanks, if you do not wish to maintain those packages, put my name on them. Peter

[Fink-devel] python modules do not comply with policy

2003-04-02 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Hi, Depending upon which version of python is installed, the modules will go into a different place (/sw/lib/python-VERSION/site-packages). Now, this is a problem for me, and I think I will have to make numeric-py22 and pil-py22 packages in order for sketch to work without having to answer a

Re: [Fink-devel] python modules do not comply with policy

2003-04-02 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 03:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I sure hope not. I don't have the time to maintain all those variants. Yes, I know it is a pain, but I don't see a way around it, at least the current version of sketch has no hope of working with python-2.3 due to changes made

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Requiring MD5s

2003-04-01 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Here is the relevant discussion from #fink (edited, times in JST). Apr 01 13:42:47 Clef anyone object to requiring md5s for all packages? Apr 01 13:42:49 Clef no? good Apr 01 14:07:37 pogma Clef: What do you mean requiring? Apr 01 14:08:32 pogma Clef: If you mean that the package will not build

[Fink-devel] building gtk+2-2.0.9-3 with xfree86-4.3

2003-03-29 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Hi, I just built gtk+2-2.0.9 with xfree86-4.3 with no errors. The problem seems to have been that xfree86-4.3 does not have Xft/XftFreetype.h, but when I grep for this [pogma:src/gtk+2-2.0.9-3/gtk+-2.0.9] peter% grep -rl Xft\/XftFreetype.h . ./config.log ./configure ./configure.in Simply

Re: [Fink-devel] building gtk+2-2.0.9-3 with xfree86-4.3

2003-03-29 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Saturday, March 29, 2003, at 09:50 PM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: If i remember correctly, it does not build the xft backend libs then, maybe compare the filelisting of the 2 debs? one with xfree 4.2 and one with the check removed and against xfree 4.3 I have no idea, and am too lazy to check,

Re: [Fink-devel] MD5

2003-03-27 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 10:43 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: This is a plea to fink developers to make sure that you include MD5 fields for all of the sourcefiles your package downloads. When you run fink validate on your .info file, it will warn you if the MD5 field is missing. Here

Re: [Fink-devel] MD5

2003-03-27 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 11:21 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: Here is a list of stable packages missing the MD5, there are many other validate warnings I missed the crypto tree, here are those too: Warning: No MD5 checksum specified for source. (dcmtk-ssl-3.5.1-14.info) Warning: No MD5

[Fink-devel] g-wrap need's to have it's .la's installed

2003-03-09 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Hi, From a report on -users, I realized that g-wrap needs to have it's .la's around so that the modules may be loaded into the guile interpreter. Currently there are 3 packages g-wrap, g-wrap-dev and g-wrap-shlibs. Now I could rewrite the splitoffs and move the .la's into g-wrap-shlibs, or I

[Fink-devel] Re: packages KDE 3.1 needs before a stable move

2003-03-09 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Monday, March 10, 2003, at 12:03 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote: sane-backends Are there any objections to any of these? Yes. sane-backends includes a whole bunch of scanner drivers which are either known to not work or not known to work. I don't want to see this in stable. Thanks, Peter

[Fink-devel] Re: packages KDE 3.1 needs before a stable move

2003-03-09 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Monday, March 10, 2003, at 06:16 AM, Ben Hines wrote: Yes. sane-backends includes a whole bunch of scanner drivers which are either known to not work or not known to work. I don't want to see this in stable. .. so document that. A few parts of sane-backends not working is not worth holding

[Fink-devel] scigraphica

2003-02-20 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Hi, Well, I made myself a thread safe dlcompat, but that was not the problem with scigraphica at all. Turns out it was the same problem as the guy on opendarwin-hackers had, the python modules were built -twolevel_namespace -bundle_loader. I did fink rebuild numeric pygtk and it now works. The

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Python-mysql aka MySQLdb python module

2003-02-19 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Whereever it is getting the -arch i386 it isn't going to work on Mac OS X as there are no fat libraries or compiler toolchain installed. When building darwin there is an env var/make option. make RC_ARCHS=ppc , what is required for this package I do not know, but you'll have to change it.

Re: [Fink-devel] guile 1.6.3

2003-02-18 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Well, that one is easy, either define environ to *_NSGetEnviron() with a patch in the right source files, or remove the libtool -no-undefined flag, the former is preferable. If someone does add a new guile to fink, please let me know in advance as gnucash will have to be revision upped and

Re: [Fink-devel] xfree86-4.3 and /etc/fonts

2003-02-07 Thread Peter O'Gorman
I'd suggest a PostRmScript with an ln -sf to restore the symlink. Peter On Friday, February 7, 2003, at 10:59 PM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: Folks: I have come across a potential problem while putting together the xfree86-4.2.99.901 package. Xfree86 4.3 installs a font database for fontconfig

Re: [Fink-devel] OS/X Libtool -bundle

2003-02-06 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, at 04:19 PM, Ben Hines wrote: btw, i think the bind_at_load two-step stuff is only need for C++. It shouldn't be in the C part of libtool. pogma? Yes, I posted to the libtool list recently (last week?) asking why it is done two step and -bind at load for all

Re: [Fink-devel] Scigraphica and Xchemdraw

2003-02-05 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 07:45 PM, Ben Hines wrote: I don't know how to make fink packages, but could really need Scigraphica, http://scigraphica.sourceforge.net. Is this the same python dlopening crash that some other poster had? I don't know, does scigraphica expect a

[Fink-devel] Re: flat namespaces redux

2003-02-03 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 12:01 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote: cc -multiply_defined suppress -prebind blah || cc -flat_namespace -undefined suppress blah 1. libkdeui's LIBADD is -lkdecore 2. the first half of the link complains that -lqt-mt is indirectly referenced 3. it builds the library

Re: [Fink-devel] docbook-bundle-4.1.2-2 fails to install!

2003-02-01 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Your head is broken, I assume you used CPAN or something to update/install a perl module and you got a /usr/bin/HEAD which overwrote your original /usr/bin/head. Get your old head back and all will be fine. Peter On Saturday, February 1, 2003, at 11:18 PM, Mark Knipfer wrote: In Mac OS

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: apr-0.9.2-1

2003-01-23 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Thursday, January 23, 2003, at 11:59 PM, Christian Schaffner wrote: -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DDARWIN -DSIGPROCMASK_SETS_THREAD_MASK -no-cpp-precomp -I/sw/include -I../include -I../include/arch/unix -c apr_hash.c touch apr_hash.lo apr_hash.c:373: conflicting types for `apr_hash_count'

Re: [Fink-devel] serious libtool bug ?

2003-01-16 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Thursday, January 16, 2003, at 01:47 AM, Max Horn wrote: So what do you think? Is this still your stance: At 23:28 Uhr +0900 15.01.2003, Peter O'Gorman wrote: You are, of course correct with the compatibility versions, and I think it is worth getting this upstream even if it breaks

Re: [Fink-devel] Relink fails in evoultion 1.2.1

2003-01-15 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, at 11:02 PM, Max Horn wrote: Maybe one of you can tell me how to fix this properly: I am working on evolution 1.2.1, and it gets to the build phase just fine (which does a make install DESTDIR, by the way). But it dies trying to relink one of its libs because

Re: [Fink-devel] serious libtool bug ?

2003-01-14 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, at 12:53 AM, Max Horn wrote: # Like Linux, but with the current version available in # verstring for coding it into the library header major=.`expr $current - $age` versuffix=$major.$age.$revision minor_current=`expr $current + 1`

Re: [Fink-devel] OT (sort of): Help with a binary requiring a library

2003-01-13 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Monday, January 13, 2003, at 11:03 PM, Jared wrote: One more question. I am having difficulty finding good information about PackageMaker. I can't figure out how to install more than one file to different locations. For example, my libxml2 package will have to install some files into

[Fink-devel] Re: Sodipodi 0.28 seems stable

2003-01-13 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 08:23 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: I have installed sodipodi on a couple of 10.2.3 systems, one running X installed by fink and the other running it from the apple X11 with system-free86. In both cases it (and as far as it needed them all its

[Fink-devel] future dlcompat may break your package

2002-12-18 Thread Peter O'Gorman
In order for kdemultimedia to work I had to modify dlcompat in cvs so that it binds all libraries fully when bind_at_load is specified (dyld should be doing that but isn't), the dlcompat which does this is currently in opendarwin cvs. Now the problem, although this dlcompat fixes

Re: [Fink-devel] Bug or Feature missing

2002-12-16 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 02:34 PM, Patrick Sodré wrote: /daemon /service There is no close to the here document here... Put a in and you should be good to go. PostInstScript: if [ x$1 = xinstall ]; then daemonic enable openafs-client; fi PreRmScript: if [ x$1 = xremove ]; then

Re: [Fink-devel] refactoring and documenting the Perl Fink:: classes and fink tool

2002-12-01 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Sunday, December 1, 2002, at 11:23 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Ben Er, we already do have a fink cleanup command. :) No we don't: Common commmands: [snip list without cleanup] This is from fink --help. If it's not there, it DOESN'T EXIST. Hmm, look at the header for that

Re: [Fink-devel] Possible Donations Setup.

2002-11-27 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 07:27 PM, David wrote: The main reason for having such an account still holds, namely, that I do not have to turn people away who WANT to donate. I am not going to actively ask for it. Collecting money from people on the basis that it might come in

Re: [Fink-devel] How to get stable/binaries started?

2002-11-17 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 10:16 PM, Carsten Klapp wrote: I received positive reports for a few of my unstable packages. How many positive reports are generally needed before making a binary is considered? file 3.39-1, qtplay 1.1-1 Willy Traver [EMAIL PROTECTED] cmatrix

[Fink-devel] Jon Dugan - maintainer of cidr and calc mail bounces

2002-11-05 Thread Peter O'Gorman
I tried to mail the maintainer [EMAIL PROTECTED] about a bug in his package (well they both have bugs, one hardcoded /sw in the patch, the other has missing source), but he obviously never paid for mac.com (I don't blame him for this, I never paid either). I am going to update one of them,

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem problems in current cvs with pstoedit

2002-11-04 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 01:11 PM, Ben Hines wrote: Bingo. definitely a gcc bug, already filed: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl and search for 7327. My apologies for posting this and promptly going to bed. Thanks Jean-Francois, Max and Ben for looking into it. It kind of

[Fink-devel] -isystem problems in current cvs with pstoedit

2002-11-03 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Hi, Well, I haven't investigated why, but, with -isystem, I have some problems building pstoedit, I updated the revision in cvs so it works with current fink-cvs, but it will be troublesome for other packages also presumably... With -isystem /sw/include : configure:7476: g++ -c -g -O2

Re: [Fink-devel] CPATH / LIBRARY_PATH

2002-10-24 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Friday, October 25, 2002, at 01:17 AM, Max Horn wrote: What do you people think? My suggestion would be to try that ASAP. I could disable the default values of CPPFLAGS/LDFLAGS and instead give default values to CPATH/LIBRARY_PATH. That's 5 minutes to change it (and also 5 minutes to

Re: [Fink-devel] system-python

2002-10-07 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Monday, October 7, 2002, at 08:37 PM, Max Horn wrote: Personally I cannot judge whether that is feasible or if it will cause problems. The nice thing about it of course would be that e.g. libxml2 wouldn't anymore require people to build python or python-nox. But maybe it has other

Re: [Fink-devel] appropriate optimization flags for compiler?

2002-10-07 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Monday, October 7, 2002, at 06:07 PM, Sébastien Pierre wrote: Le lundi, 7 oct 2002, à 07:41 Europe/Paris, Jeremy Erwin a écrit : Many fink packages appear to be compiled with -O2 -g. While this may be appropriate for debugging, the -g flag can increase the size of binaries. A more

Re: [Fink-devel] db4, db41, and gift

2002-09-29 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Monday, September 30, 2002, at 12:40 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Why does db41-shlibs conflict with db4-shlibs? It wouldn't need a new name if it did. And if it replaces db4-shlibs, gift needs new dependencies. I thought this error was fixed for gift in cvs. (and indeed when I look

[Fink-devel] dladdr in dlcompat future release

2002-07-01 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Hi, I would like to know if anyone has seen configure checking for dladdr, if you have, could you please e-mail me the package, so that I can check my implementation of that function. In case you are interested you can check out the code at: cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/od

Re: [Fink-devel] where to find library to link?

2002-05-18 Thread Peter O'Gorman
You'll need to use strtoq instead. You should just be ably to -Dstrtoll=strtoq on the cc line, but that is ugly. Peter On Sunday, May 19, 2002, at 02:56 AM, Thomas Kotzian wrote: i wanted to port graphviz - there's only 1 problem left (i hope so) when linking, i cannot find the symbol:

Re: [Fink-devel] 0.4.0a vs. 0.4.1

2002-04-24 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002, at 10:28 PM, Max Horn wrote: * dangerous problem in passwd * broken libmpeg * broken r-base * source bootstraping seems not possible w/o trick (trick being that you download the debianutil source manually, and during bootstrap tell Fink in which directory

Re: [Fink-devel] Is abiword still maintained ?

2002-04-23 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Well, 1.0 has been released :-) April 19th 2002 seems to have been the release date. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=15518release_id=25198 Peter On Tuesday, April 23, 2002, at 04:12 AM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Jin Zhao wrote: Abiword is close to

Re: [Fink-devel] Move aggressive

2002-04-22 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Monday, April 22, 2002, at 07:00 PM, Max Horn wrote: I also would like to know if anybody here has built run any of these so I can move: pan-0.11.3-1 gaim-0.56-3 sdl-1.2.4-1 I have built, installed and minimally tested the latest gaim. Also many others, is there a quick and easy

Re: [Fink-devel] elf's dl*() ported...

2002-04-16 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 10:45 PM, Ben Hines wrote: At 3:34 PM +0200 4/16/02, Max Horn wrote: Uhm, sorry, you are lagging behind a year or so ... :-) dlcompat, which also provides these functions, has been available for ages, from Apple's Darwin CVS. And we did a complete

Re: [Fink-devel] libtool hacker needed...

2002-04-10 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Thursday, April 11, 2002, at 10:42 AM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 not giFTcurs. giFT-gtk. I cannot the gtk client to compile with the - --no-dlopen option. Without it, it compiles fine, but It cannot find the symbols in the .so file. What

Re: [Fink-devel] fink index feedback

2002-04-03 Thread Peter O'Gorman
You forgot to check out the fink module from cvs :-) Fink will only update itself for point releases, in between times you have to cvs update the fink module and run ./inject.pl On Wednesday, April 3, 2002, at 11:42 PM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: I know it's in CVS, but I am confused. I run

Re: [Fink-devel] strict-dep checker script

2002-03-25 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Monday, March 25, 2002, at 08:14 PM, Max Horn wrote: At 13:35 Uhr +0900 25.03.2002, Peter O'Gorman wrote: I have one suggestion for this. When you have built everything with nothing installed, you should build again with everything installed. Building twice like this will find both

Re: [Fink-devel] strict-dep checker script

2002-03-24 Thread Peter O'Gorman
I have one suggestion for this. When you have built everything with nothing installed, you should build again with everything installed. Building twice like this will find both missing Depends and Conflicts... I think it is a great idea. Peter On Monday, March 25, 2002, at 10:20 AM, Max

Re: [Fink-devel] CVS commit rules

2002-03-19 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Tuesday, March 19, 2002, at 11:32 PM, Bertrand Lupart wrote: Correct me if i'm wrong, but if a user has a foo version of a package that has obsolete download url, a fink update won't bring him back the correct download url since the version hasn't been bump versionned. So he might come

Re: [Fink-devel] CVS trouble (was: ever-changing upstream source)

2002-03-12 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Might want to set it not to do expansion on files with the .patch extension... Peter On Tuesday, March 12, 2002, at 09:27 PM, Max Horn wrote: It is not confusing CVS, CVS is simply doing its job: key word expansion. We use this for the documentation, for example.

Re: [Fink-devel] fink install audiofile-shlib has odd results

2002-03-12 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Wednesday, March 13, 2002, at 09:34 AM, Max Horn wrote: Peter, the code should be changed to *not* read in the package DB when fink list --help is issued =) Or we need that caching code, it's no fun to wait 10-20 secs :( I vote for the caching code, Finlay.. :) Okay, I'll look at it

Re: [Fink-devel] zsh breaks configure scripts

2002-03-04 Thread Peter O'Gorman
And why are you sending this here? Fink has no control over which shell Apple decides to ship, although they will eventually move to using bash as /bin/sh, probably not until 10.2 or even later... Peter On Monday, March 4, 2002, at 11:51 PM, Eric Norum wrote: Apple uses zsh as /bin/sh on

Re: [Fink-devel] kde3 revisited

2002-03-02 Thread Peter O'Gorman
You'll have to play with libtool a little more than that. I would suggest patching the ltmain.sh and ltconfig which come with kde. From what I understand kde wants to load dylibs at runtime and/or link against loadable modules. Is that correct? In this case you'll have to change the library

Re: [Fink-devel] Reason to provide better clues w/virtual dependencies

2002-02-25 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Okay, what exactly do you mean by better feedback? Peter On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 11:50 PM, Bill Bumgarner wrote: http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/pythonmac-sig/1042874 It seems Fink is being used by more and more folks that are not necessarily familiar with Darwin or

Re: [Fink-devel] Puzzling issue with CDPATH / libtool / gdk-pixbuf

2002-02-25 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Hi, Your problems may be a conflict with gtk-doc which Masanori hasn't noticed yet... I am sure he'll fix it as and when he gets the time. It is, after all the unstable tree we are talking about here :) Am copying him. Peter On Tuesday, February 26, 2002, at 12:53 AM, Martin Costabel

Re: [Fink-devel] Shared Libraries Policy, round 2

2002-02-13 Thread Peter O'Gorman
I have one small problem with your proposal, it only lets us make 2 debs from one build. I am going to put my proposal in an example: Package: mystuff Version: 1.2.3 Revision: 1 Source: http://www.example.com/mystuff.tar.gz Debs: shlibs, docs, bin DebShlibs: %i/lib/libmylib-1.2.3.dylib

Re: [Fink-devel] Shared Libraries Policy, round 2

2002-02-13 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Fair enough, I don't really care how it is set up in the info file, I just think that limiting the system to 2 debs is inappropriate. Peter On Thursday, February 14, 2002, at 01:04 PM, El JoPe Magnifico wrote: At this point, it'd be cleaner to do something like the debian/control file,

Re: [Fink-devel] Shared libs and interpreters

2002-02-12 Thread Peter O'Gorman
doing any of this, please e-mail me your sources, and I will put them on the submissions tracker. Thanks, Peter On Wednesday, February 13, 2002, at 08:46 AM, Jorge Acereda Maciá wrote: On Wednesday, February 13, 2002, at 12:26 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: Please put your dlcompat on package

proposed new dlcompat (was :Re: [Fink-devel] Shared libs and interpreters)

2002-02-12 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Jorge Acereda Maciá has written a dlcompat with the ability to dlopen dylibs. I have put it on package submissions: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=516734group_id= 17203atid=414256 Please check it out and comment on it. It needs to not break anything :) Thanks, Peter

Re: [Fink-devel] fink package manager changes in CVS - please try

2002-01-26 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Hi, I just did: %cvs co fink %cd fink %./inject.pl fink selfupdate only gets the latest released package manager. Peter On Sunday, January 27, 2002, at 11:58 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote: Is there a way to do this when using fink selfupdate-cvs? As far as I can tell, the changes that were made

<    1   2   3   4   5   >