On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 02:34 PM, Patrick Sodré wrote:
/daemon
/service
There is no close to the here document here...
Put a
in and you should be good to go.
PostInstScript:
if [ x$1 = xinstall ]; then
daemonic enable openafs-client;
fi
PreRmScript:
if [ x$1 = xremove ]; then
I propose the creation of a new package category libs/obsolete.
This will be the place that we put a package libfoo-shlibs which we are
only keeping around for backward compatibility, for folks that have
something compiled against the old library. The headers and the key
/sw/lib/libfoo.dylib
Hi Peter,
Nope You're probably looking at the generated .xml file, which
is the end result of the bug or whatever that I've found.
Regards.
Patrick Sodre
On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 07:40 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 02:34 PM, Patrick Sodré wrote:
Le lundi, 16 déc 2002, à 21:45 Europe/Paris, David a écrit :
What type of Macintosh do you run Fink on?
- beige G3 desktop
- BW G3
- iBook
- TiBook
- single G4
- Dual G4
- imac rev c
- ibook snow
- Powerbook (Wallstreet)
[...]
Which version of Fink is installed? (dev/normal)
( Please complete this list! )
0.5.0a.cvs
0.5.0a
0.4.0.cvs
0.4.0
other (which: ...)
[...]
How useful is Fink to you?
(presents a scale from 1 to 8)
- a bit # # # # # # # # a lot
Hm, that's a very vague question I think.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
snip
How useful is Fink to you?
(presents a scale from 1 to 8)
- a bit # # # # # # # # a lot
Hm, that's a very vague question I think.
Since this measures a personal impression, there is no other way gauge
it. I cannot tell you how
On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 03:45 PM, David wrote:
How much time did the installation of Fink safe you to get unix
programs running?
- 15-30 minutes
- 30-60 minutes
- 2 hours
- 4 hours
- 6 hours
- more than 12 hours.
unknown?
How man packages do you have installed?
typo many
I'm a bit confused still. Do you mean that you want apple to adopt fink
and distribute it with the OS or Dev packages? Or do you want their
staff to help you? Or what?
Simon
On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 04:18 PM, David wrote:
This question merely gauges how the users feel about Fink. If
Le lundi, 16 déc 2002, à 22:18 Europe/Paris, David a écrit :
How useful is Fink to you?
(presents a scale from 1 to 8)
- a bit # # # # # # # # a lot
Hm, that's a very vague question I think.
Since this measures a personal impression, there is no other way gauge
it. I cannot tell you how
I dare to ask the question: is this really necessary?
I find a 30-50 questions survey repulsive! In my eyes it makes fink
begin to look like, well, a commercial product. Maybe I have always
looked the other way when I encountered one, but after thinking for 30
seconds I couldn't come up with
One thing I've run into with the here-document parsing: if there is any
whitespace AFTER , on the same line, it won't be recognized as closing
the here-document.
HTH,
Dave
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes
Patrick Näf wrote:
[]
Sorry for my extremely negative attitude, but it is what I feel.
You are not alone.
--
Martin
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High
On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 16:54, Patrick Näf wrote:
I dare to ask the question: is this really necessary?
I find a 30-50 questions survey repulsive! In my eyes it makes fink
begin to look like, well, a commercial product. Maybe I have always
looked the other way when I encountered one, but
Max and I spoke very carefully about this and he seems to feel, that
it is a good idea to query users.
Personally I do not wish to be some anonymous provider of a packaging
system. I wish to know who I am doing this for and I wish to be able
to keep it that way.
And this is why I haven't
David wrote:
Please review them carefully and add your comments/answers.
...
How useful is Fink to you?
(presents a scale from 1 to 8)
- a bit # # # # # # # # a lot
I think it would be informative to ask how often fink and (more
importantly) fink-installed packages are used.
How
Hi,
just to add my 2 cents:
Please review them carefully and add your comments/answers.
- ---start
Age:
Gender:
- female
- male
Occupation:
- Student
- IT-Professional
- Professor
Professor is a bit to narrow IMHO. I would ask for researcher/academic
staff or similar (I'm a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Montag, Dezember 16, 2002, at 11:43 Uhr, Thom Peters II wrote:
snip
The correct terms for gender would be masculine and feminine,
unless you're wondering what's between the user's legs, in which case
you would be querying Sex and not
Gender: - Do not wish to say
I assume the whole survey will be voluntary, no? And no silly
javascript-popup-survey either please! ;-P
So even if one does not wish to fill it out, one may still use fink
Also some of the comments and responses generated in this thread could
also be used as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Dienstag, Dezember 17, 2002, at 12:38 Uhr, Patrick Näf wrote:
To me it is, yes.
That one was obvious :-)
Amazing ehy ?
Oh, there are many. KDE, GNOME, even some GNU projects have or have
had efforts in the past to gather
On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 04:54 PM, Patrick Näf wrote:
I once more ask the question: what do you need this data for? I would
also be interested to hear from Max Horn and other core people if this
is something coordinated.
As someone else already said, it would likely to be a good
On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 05:18 PM, S Woodside wrote:
On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 04:54 PM, Patrick Näf wrote:
I once more ask the question: what do you need this data for? I would
also be interested to hear from Max Horn and other core people if
this is something coordinated.
Does anyone plan to fix the upgrade matrix? Somehow i feel it won't get
done - ever - or possibly, maybe, 3 weeks from now - unless I do it
myself.
This is why we shouldn't have delayed 0.5.0a, because nothing ever gets
released it seems. Noone has the time to do anything. (except maybe
On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 05:53 PM, David wrote:
Well if we were to go that route, I could also say, that we do not
need the whole survey and nobody needs to put effort into this.
Ah, the i'll take my toys and go home angle? Grow up. A short survey
would be useful. We don't need to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Dienstag, Dezember 17, 2002, at 03:12 Uhr, Ben Hines wrote:
On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 05:53 PM, David wrote:
Well if we were to go that route, I could also say, that we do not
need the whole survey and nobody needs to put
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Just an informational Mail.
I for my part am closing this thread. I am not going to answer any more
mail concerning this thread since I feel that many valid arguments have
been made and I should try to analyse them before speaking more of this
Ben, I've been working on it today. There are some problems which I would
be happy to discuss with someone. Unfortunately I can't get on IRC right
now -- I'll try again in a bit.
-- Dave
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great
David,
please allow me to respond more in general than to specific comments. I
think I have to rephrase and sum up everything a bit, otherwise the
discussion will degenerate into details and nobody will understand
anymore what we were initially talking about.
Step for step:
Motivation: I
As part of my redemption for the sin of making negative comments on the
list :-) I would like to offer the following penance:
Quite a number of .info files don't have a Homepage or Source-MD5
field. If you people think that it would be worthwile I would make an
effort to provide the necessary
I'm sorry, but I find David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) to be incredibly annoying.
First it was just the the PGP signed messages that I couldn't read in pine
4.50 (I had to get pgpenvelope working to read them) and then it was his
trying to take over the whole of fink documentation while, in my American
29 matches
Mail list logo
