[Fink-users] mutt failed on 10.3

2003-12-08 Thread Claus Atzenbeck
Hi! Mutt is available on 10.3 tree (unstable 1.4i-21). My problem is that fink is looking for 1.4.1i-1 and tells me that there is no package description: *** $ sudo fink install mutt Information about 1955 packages read in 2 seconds. The following package will be insta

[Fink-users] update-all fails for aspell

2003-12-08 Thread Claus Atzenbeck
Hi, I have encountered another problem: $ sudo fink update-all Information about 1940 packages read in 2 seconds. The following 8 packages will be installed or updated: aspell-de aspell-en libogg libogg-shlibs libvorbis0 libvorbis0-shlibs ocaml tetex-texmf [...]

Re: [Fink-users] mutt failed on 10.3

2003-12-08 Thread Martin Costabel
Claus Atzenbeck wrote: [] Failed: can't build mutt-1.4.1i-1 because no package description is available Maybe you haven't said "fink index" often enough recently ;-) -- Martin --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does

Re: [Fink-users] mutt failed on 10.3

2003-12-08 Thread Claus Atzenbeck
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Martin Costabel wrote: > Maybe you haven't said "fink index" often enough recently ;-) It does not seem so: *** $ sudo fink index Reading package info... Updating package index... done. $ sudo fink install mutt Information about 1940 packages read

Re: [Fink-users] mutt failed on 10.3

2003-12-08 Thread Martin Costabel
Claus Atzenbeck wrote: On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Martin Costabel wrote: [] Failed: can't build mutt-1.4.1i-1 because no package description is available Apart from doing "fink index" 2 or 3 more times, the only other idea I have is to look what "dpkg -l mutt" has to say. The "mutt-1.4.1i-1" must be st

[Fink-users] Crash installing Abiword

2003-12-08 Thread Christian Ebert
Hi, Abiword builds on my machine (10.2.8) but crashes when I install it -- apparently when it tries to create the html docs: Unpacking abiword (from .../abiword_2.0.1-2_darwin-powerpc.deb) ... Setting up abiword (2.0.1-2) ... building html help files ... aboutos.abw ./make-html.sh: line 72: 8350

[Fink-users] xdvi.cfg missing in tetex 2.0.2-34

2003-12-08 Thread Bruno Martin
Hello, and sorry to bother fink people again with xdvi/tetex problems. I've upgraded tetex to 2.0.2-34 today and my xdvi from tetex (which was finally working fine with the previous tetex package) detects the following error (also after a reboot) : Xdvi Error: Could not find config file xdvi.cfg i

Re: [Fink-users] mutt failed on 10.3

2003-12-08 Thread Claus Atzenbeck
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Martin Costabel wrote: > Claus Atzenbeck wrote: > > > On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Martin Costabel wrote: > [] > > Failed: can't build mutt-1.4.1i-1 because no package description is available > > Apart from doing "fink index" 2 or 3 more times, the only other idea I "fink index" does

[Fink-users] Fink scientific packages in 10.3

2003-12-08 Thread Sébastien Maret
A number of scientific packages are missing from the 10.3 branch (octave, yorick, scipy...). Is there any reason for that ? When this packages will be included in 10.3 branch ? Cheers, Sébastien --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net G

[Fink-users] Re: xdvi.cfg missing in tetex 2.0.2-34

2003-12-08 Thread Christian Ebert
* Bruno Martin on Mon, Dec 08, 2003: > and sorry to bother fink people again with xdvi/tetex problems. > I've upgraded tetex to 2.0.2-34 today and my xdvi from tetex > (which was finally working fine with the previous tetex package) > detects the following error (also after a reboot) : > > Xdvi Er

Re: [Fink-users] Fink scientific packages in 10.3

2003-12-08 Thread Alexander Hansen
I would assume they'd be there if they could be built or run on 10.3. On Dec 8, 2003, at 10:15 AM, Sébastien Maret wrote: A number of scientific packages are missing from the 10.3 branch (octave, yorick, scipy...). Is there any reason for that ? When this packages will be included in 10.3 branc

[Fink-users] clamav

2003-12-08 Thread Bart Silverstrim
Does anyone know if clamav is almost ready to be moved to the 10.3 list of usable ports? Thanks! -Bart --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create b

[Fink-users] lyx-qt

2003-12-08 Thread Jens Nockel
Hi, after a selfupdate and update-all last night (with Jaguar), the lyx-qt package isn't working the way it used to before. I am using Apple's X11 on my Ti notebook. I had been using lyx-qt extensively, but without anti-aliasing. Suddenly anti-aliasing is turned on under lyx-qt, and this comes wi

Re: [Fink-users] mutt failed on 10.3

2003-12-08 Thread Martin Costabel
Claus Atzenbeck wrote: [] Mutt 1.4.1i-1 is located in my 10.2 tree: /sw/fink/10.2/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/net/mutt_1.4.1i-1_darwin-powerpc.deb /sw/fink/10.2/unstable/main/finkinfo/net/mutt-1.4.1i-1.info However, my system (MacOS 10.3.1) is supposed to use the 10.3 tree and usually it do

Re: [Fink-users] update-all fails for aspell

2003-12-08 Thread Martin Costabel
Claus Atzenbeck wrote: [] make install DESTDIR=/sw/src/root-aspell-de-0.50-11 word-list-compress d < de-only.cwl | aspell --lang=de create master ./de-only.rws Error: The key "tex-command" is unknown. make: *** [de-only.rws] Error 1 What version of aspell do you have installed? -- Martin --

Re: [Fink-users] update-all fails for aspell

2003-12-08 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 8 déc. 2003, à 19:54, Martin Costabel a écrit : Claus Atzenbeck wrote: [] make install DESTDIR=/sw/src/root-aspell-de-0.50-11 word-list-compress d < de-only.cwl | aspell --lang=de create master ./de-only.rws Error: The key "tex-command" is unknown. make: *** [de-only.rws] Error 1 What version

[Fink-users] Compiling gtk+2-2.2.4-2 failed

2003-12-08 Thread Michael E. Zwick
In trying to do an update, I noted that compiling gtk+2-2.2.4-2 failed. I am configured to use the unstable tree. I am running 10.3, Dual 2GHZ G5 Package manager version: 0.17.1 Distribution version: 0.6.2.cvs --- >From the error below I noted a possible problem with Freetype?

Re: [Fink-users] Compiling gtk+2-2.2.4-2 failed

2003-12-08 Thread Alexander Hansen
This has been discussed in the lists: you need to remove all your freetype and freetype2 packages, by force if need be. On Dec 8, 2003, at 2:27 PM, Michael E. Zwick wrote: In trying to do an update, I noted that compiling gtk+2-2.2.4-2 failed. I am configured to use the unstable tree. I am runn

Re: [Fink-users] Fink scientific packages in 10.3

2003-12-08 Thread William Scott
FWIW I was able to compile scipy on 10.3 using python2.3 after manually moving it and its dependencies. I haven't had a chance to test for runtime problems. William G. Scott Associate Professor Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and The Center for the Molecular Biology of RNA Sinsheimer L

Re: [Fink-users] update-all fails for aspell

2003-12-08 Thread Claus Atzenbeck
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Martin Costabel wrote: > Claus Atzenbeck wrote: > [] > > make install DESTDIR=/sw/src/root-aspell-de-0.50-11 > > word-list-compress d < de-only.cwl | aspell --lang=de create master ./de-only.rws > > Error: The key "tex-command" is unknown. > > make: *** [de-only.rws] Error 1 >

Re: [Fink-users] mutt failed on 10.3

2003-12-08 Thread Claus Atzenbeck
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Martin Costabel wrote: > Make sure that > 1. /sw/fink/dists is a symlink to 10.3 and that > 2. /sw/etc/fink.conf contains the line > Distribution: 10.3 Both are exactly that way on my computer. I have tested to install mutt on a clean install (temporarily moved /sw to /sw-old

[Fink-users] Orbit2 fails to compile

2003-12-08 Thread Michèle Garoche
I've tried again to update orbit2 and got the following result: dpkg -i /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/gnome/orbit2- dev_2.8.2-3_darwin-powerpc.deb /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/gnome/orbit2_2.8.2 -3_darwin-powerpc.deb /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/b

Re: [Fink-users] Re: xdvi.cfg missing in tetex 2.0.2-34

2003-12-08 Thread Martin Costabel
Christian Ebert wrote: [] Xdvi Error: Could not find config file xdvi.cfg in path I get the same error after upgrading. Even though I got the same. After "fink reinstall tetex-base", it disappeared. No idea why. -- Martin --- This SF.net email

Re: [Fink-users] Compiling gtk+2-2.2.4-2 failed

2003-12-08 Thread Terje Tjervaag
On Dec 8, 2003, at 8:38 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: This has been discussed in the lists: you need to remove all your freetype and freetype2 packages, by force if need be. I have the same problem too, and have, after searching the archives, tried this approach. Removed, rebuilt, reinstalled. S

Re: [Fink-users] Compiling gtk+2-2.2.4-2 failed

2003-12-08 Thread Alexander Hansen
Did you follow this sequence: 1) remove all freetype packages--including -shlibs and -dev 2) install gtk+2 3) reinstall the freetype* packages ? On Dec 8, 2003, at 3:52 PM, Terje Tjervaag wrote: On Dec 8, 2003, at 8:38 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: This has been discussed in the lists: you need t

Re: [Fink-users] mutt failed on 10.3

2003-12-08 Thread Martin Costabel
Claus Atzenbeck wrote: On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Martin Costabel wrote: Make sure that 1. /sw/fink/dists is a symlink to 10.3 and that 2. /sw/etc/fink.conf contains the line Distribution: 10.3 Both are exactly that way on my computer. I have tested to install mutt on a clean install (temporarily mo

Re: [Fink-users] Compiling gtk+2-2.2.4-2 failed

2003-12-08 Thread Terje Tjervaag
On Dec 8, 2003, at 10:02 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Did you follow this sequence: 1) remove all freetype packages--including -shlibs and -dev 2) install gtk+2 3) reinstall the freetype* packages ? Thanks for the quick reply. The answer is yes: 1.) sudo dpkg --remove --force-depends freetype2 fr

Re: [Fink-users] mutt failed on 10.3

2003-12-08 Thread Claus Atzenbeck
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Martin Costabel wrote: > No idea, sorry. But you can try to do > >fink install mutt-1.4i-21 > > to force the installation of the new version. I did "fink purge mutt". This has solved the problem. Don't ask me why, but after that "fink install mutt" is now compiling the ver

Re: [Fink-users] Compiling gtk+2-2.2.4-2 failed

2003-12-08 Thread Alexander Hansen
Hmm... Another solution was as follows: On Dec 5, 2003, at 8:54 PM, David Orlovich wrote: This didn't work for me. Originally I didn't have Fink's freetype2 installed and I got the same error message despite having Apple's X11 - installing Fink's freetype2 didn't help, nor did removing it and

Re: [Fink-users] update-all fails for aspell

2003-12-08 Thread Martin Costabel
Michèle Garoche wrote: [] There is a change in aspell today, split into aspell; aspell-dev, aspell-shlibs. Yes, I have seen this. But this is no reason for aspell-de not to compile. It compiles for me, in any case. So that the dictionaries should change. I've already cc'd the maintainer for de,

Re: [Fink-users] Compiling gtk+2-2.2.4-2 failed

2003-12-08 Thread Martin Costabel
Terje Tjervaag wrote: [] 1.) sudo dpkg --remove --force-depends freetype2 freetype2-shlibs freetype freetype-bin 2.) fink install gtk+2 - ends with the error: checking for freetype-config... /sw/bin/freetype-config This is impossible. /sw/bin/freetype-config is part of freetype2 and

Re: [Fink-users] Compiling gtk+2-2.2.4-2 failed

2003-12-08 Thread Terje Tjervaag
Thanks again, I did a selfupdate just now and made sure afterwards that the two lines you mentioned were listed in /sw/fink/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome/gtk+2.info, but I still get the same error. On Dec 8, 2003, at 10:30 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Hmm... Another solution was as follow

Re: [Fink-users] Compiling gtk+2-2.2.4-2 failed

2003-12-08 Thread Terje Tjervaag
On Dec 8, 2003, at 10:39 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: This is impossible. /sw/bin/freetype-config is part of freetype2 and would have been removed. The removal must have failed. What does "dpkg -l freetype\*" give? That's just because I copied manually in another freetype-config in a feeble att

Re: [Fink-users] Compiling gtk+2-2.2.4-2 failed

2003-12-08 Thread Martin Costabel
Terje Tjervaag wrote: [] That's just because I copied manually in another freetype-config in a feeble attempt to get things running. :) Didn't work, it seems. What did you say was the version of X11 you have installed? What do you get from ls -la /usr/X11R6/*i*/*freetype* -- Martin -

Re: [Fink-users] Compiling gtk+2-2.2.4-2 failed

2003-12-08 Thread Terje Tjervaag
On Dec 8, 2003, at 11:02 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Didn't work, it seems. What did you say was the version of X11 you have installed? What do you get from ls -la /usr/X11R6/*i*/*freetype* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel1576 21 Nov 19:08 /usr/X11R6/bin/freetype-config -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3

Re: [Fink-users] update-all fails for aspell

2003-12-08 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le 8 déc. 2003, à 22:32, Martin Costabel a écrit : Michèle Garoche wrote: [] There is a change in aspell today, split into aspell; aspell-dev, aspell-shlibs. Yes, I have seen this. But this is no reason for aspell-de not to compile. It compiles for me, in any case. So that the dictionaries shou

Re: [Fink-users] Compiling gtk+2-2.2.4-2 failed

2003-12-08 Thread Martin Costabel
Terje Tjervaag wrote: On Dec 8, 2003, at 11:02 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Didn't work, it seems. What did you say was the version of X11 you have installed? What do you get from ls -la /usr/X11R6/*i*/*freetype* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel1576 21 Nov 19:08 /usr/X11R6/bin/freetype-config -rw

Re: [Fink-users] Compiling gtk+2-2.2.4-2 failed

2003-12-08 Thread Terje Tjervaag
On Dec 8, 2003, at 11:28 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Terje Tjervaag wrote: On Dec 8, 2003, at 11:02 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Didn't work, it seems. What did you say was the version of X11 you have installed? What do you get from ls -la /usr/X11R6/*i*/*freetype* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel157

[Fink-users] OT: Digest Number

2003-12-08 Thread Christopher Bowns
Hey look, it's digest number 2003! Sorry. Had to interject that. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help

[Fink-users] sdl-mixer on panther

2003-12-08 Thread GoochRules!
I cannot 'fink install sdl-mixer' on 10.3. I appear to be having the same problems as outlined in this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ msg06999.html I am unable to apply the -framework QuickTime fix as suggested; I cannot find the line in the top-level Makefile to edit. I

Re: [Fink-users] Compiling gtk+2-2.2.4-2 failed

2003-12-08 Thread Martin Costabel
Terje Tjervaag wrote: [] /usr/X11R6/include/freetype: Really "freetype", not "freetype2"? This is weird. What X11 is this? :) X11 says v1.0. It is the version that is installed with Panther. That's all I know. Any other way I can check version info further? No, that should be OK. You are s

[Fink-users] xfree86 4.2.1.1-18 can't find default font 'fixed' and dies

2003-12-08 Thread Mark E. Perkins
Greetings, I think my post for help yesterday may have been less than clear, so I'll try again I'm running OS X 10.2.8 with all recent patches, fink 0.17.1. Yesterday I upgraded to gcc3.3. After self-updating fink to use the 10.1-gcc3.3 tree, I started to update installed packages, includin

[Fink-users] dpkg Bus Errors and dpkg-deb exit code 10

2003-12-08 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, A number of people have reported problems with dpkg and dpkg-deb, this seems to be due to a badly prebound libintl, so if you happen to be one of those with dpkg-deb failing due with "exit code 10" or dpkg itself failing with a "Bus Erro" and you ha

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86 4.2.1.1-18 can't find default font 'fixed' and dies

2003-12-08 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
You've verified that all of the packages got installed, not just built? If so, try reinstalling them. On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 19:33, Mark E. Perkins wrote: > Greetings, > I think my post for help yesterday may have been less than clear, so > I'll try again > > I'm running OS X 10.2.8 with al

[Fink-users] sending email with kmail - authorization failed (#5.7.0) or "Syntax: HELO hostname "

2003-12-08 Thread Christof Wolf
Hello, I've installed kmail 3.1.4-11 and I have problems sending emails. I have three different email provider. With the first one I don't need the option "Server requires authentication" because its my provider. But it doesn't work, I got The server responded: "Syntax: HELO hostname "

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86 4.2.1.1-18 can't find default font 'fixed' and dies

2003-12-08 Thread Mark E. Perkins
Alexander K. Hansen wrote: You've verified that all of the packages got installed, not just built? If so, try reinstalling them. I used 'fink list -i' to verify that the xfree86-* packages had been installed. All the same, I reinstalled (fink reinstall ...) all of them, with no change in what

Re: [Fink-users] xdvi.cfg missing in tetex 2.0.2-34

2003-12-08 Thread David R. Morrison
Well, I can't reproduce this problem. Do you have /sw/share/texmf/xdvi/xdvi.cfg on your system? It should be supplied by the tetex-base package. -- Dave Bruno Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > and sorry to bother fink people again with xdvi/tetex problems. > I've upgraded tete

[Fink-users] panther + fink 0.6.2 + emacs21 + apple x11

2003-12-08 Thread Douglas S. J. De Couto
I am having the following problem when I try to run emacs21 from fink over X: % emacs21 -display :0 X protocol error: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation) on protocol request 45 Fatal error (6).Abort trap Anyone seen anything like it? I am running panther. I have the apple

Re: [Fink-users] sending email with kmail - authorization failed (#5.7.0) or "Syntax: HELO hostname "

2003-12-08 Thread Benjamin Reed
Does anyone have a clue why I could not send any email without using a VPN connection? By the way both providers mentioned above are working fine under mac os x 10.3 without VPN. Does your mail server require a secure connection? Could be you've got kdelibs3/kdebase3 instead of kdelibs3-ssl/kde

[Fink-users] Re: xdvi.cfg missing in tetex 2.0.2-34

2003-12-08 Thread Christian Ebert
* Martin Costabel on Mon, Dec 08, 2003: > Christian Ebert wrote: > [] >>>Xdvi Error: Could not find config file xdvi.cfg in path >> I get the same error after upgrading. Even though > > I got the same. After "fink reinstall tetex-base", it disappeared. Indeed. Thanks. > No idea why. Why not? ;-