experimented with a few such programs. I'd really like to find
something (or a combo solution) that can work both ways.
--
Mike Keesey
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http
In AS3.0 I think it can be package-private, but until then
One way is to have the Model class satisfy an interface that lacks the
property (of course, in AS2.0, all interfaces lack properties...), and
then only expose the model class as the interface elsewhere.
interface IModel {
work. A bit weird, though.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Keesey
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 6:46 PM
To: 'Flashcoders mailing list'
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Protect model setters from being called by
anyclassexcept Controller
What would be the point of that? The only point of upcasting is to have
things compile with strict typing, and the compiler can't tell what the
class is if it's dynamically determined.
Are you talking about dynamic *instantiation*? Then you could use
something like this:
// Import all classes
Putting a block comment before a function is standard, though (Javadoc).
Putting one *inside* a function is awful, though, I agree.
/**
* This is a perfectly fine Javadoc comment
*
* @param bar some parameter
*/
public function foo(bar:Object):Void {
/* Using a block
/
Oh I used about 6 asterisks in my example. I don't like huge lines of
them, either.
--
Mike Keesey
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo
suffer nor am I going to litter my
code
with ugly asterisks just to document my work when I can spend that
energy writing cleaner, easier to read code with light commenting in
the
code itself. :)
I still don't understand how Javadoc makes your process suffer.
--
Mike Keesey
I swear I saw a sortable datagrid on IFBIN - can't check at the mo' as
my work proxy won't allow access - but it is definetely dooable
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Chris Hill
Sent: 19 August 2006 01:50
To: 'Flashcoders
[as]
for (i=288; i=318; i++) {
var val = String.fromCharCode(i);
trace(val);
}
[/as]
Any good?
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Steven Loe
Sent: 22 August 2006 16:40
To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
-
As I understand it, flash is limited to rotating objects in steps of 0.1
degrees.
Mike
Bart Wttewaall wrote:
Hi Flashcoders,
I've been busy recreating the famous PageFlip application and I've
noticed something weird. It seems that movieclips have a limitation to
their rotation. When I
(preferably New
York-based) who are expert-level ActionScripters and would be interested
in working with us.
Please respond with all inquiries about these positions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you,
Mike
--
MIKE BRITTAIN
Director of Technology
ID Society, Inc.
138 West 25th Street, 9th Floor
New
Caching bug
I ran into the same problem yesterday. Just looked all over
for an as2 version of qload and I am not coming up with it.
Would you mind posting a link?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mike Mountain
Sent
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/pipermail/flashcoders/2005-February/132366.
html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mike Mountain
Sent: 18 August 2006 09:09
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] MovieClip loader IE
at once. Give your brain
time to wrap around small chunks of new info.
My .02
Mike
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you
within the bounds of this jargon -
One question inevitably leads to many more.
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mike Britton
Sent: 18 August 2006 15:33
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Best way to learn OO
it's crucial to be in sync with specialist language and concepts
Completely agree, but Jargon in any industry is always a barrier to
effective communication between the initiated and the uninitiated,
whether it is intentional or not. I just find that the OOP literati can
sometimes be a little too
I have seen others do it, or mark parameters with a p_.
I prefer not to mark parameters in any special way. I mark private
variables with _, so those are already distinct. And if I have a
function that's so long that I can't see the top from somewhere in the
body, it's well past time to cut it
There's also this free google map component:
http://www.afcomponents.com/map_google/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of David Rorex
Sent: 17 August 2006 04:48
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] OT: Flashmaps -
which slotted neatly in.
I wonder if flash 9 will have similar problems with its Loader events?
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mike Mountain
Sent: 16 August 2006 15:58
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: [Flashcoders
Just messing around converting some double buffering AS2 routines to AS3
when I stumbled upon lock() and unlock() - does this make double
buffering unnecessary? I'm not noticing any immediate speed differences
between my routine using double buffering and my test with
lock()/unlock().
Cheers
M
That's how I read it, just wondered if anyone had done any real
performance comparisions - my test is fairly simple.
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Meinte van't Kruis
Sent: 16 August 2006 10:43
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Hi Ralph
If you're feeling generous I'd be interested in seeing the source for
those comparisons
Cheers
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Hauwert, Ralph
Sent: 16 August 2006 11:16
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: RE:
$this-test2();
hth,
Mike
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe
I don't do too much online work to be honest so I've only just found
this out - but I cannot believe Adobe haven't fixed this bug.
http://livedocs.macromedia.com/flash/8/main/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/w
whelp.htm?context=LiveDocs_Partsfile=2538.html
Using listeners for the movieclip loader,
Hi John - once more, heaps of praise for this app - it truly is a
lifesaver.
Can I be cheeky and ask if there's any chance of a standalone version of
the flex one? Zinc wrapped maybe?
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of John Grden
= $myTest-test1();
echo $message;
?
/body
/html
Mike
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier
You need to create a methodTable array in the constructor of every
class you're using with AMFPHP.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
I always put my methodTable in the constructor, not include it. This
could be the source of the problem.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
Have you thought of perhaps loading the swf into an MC offstage and
using the printjob class to print that. And googling first is just plain
courtesy man. Otherwise the quality of the forums decline and all the
people who would've had the answer to your problem move on elsewhere.
M
Okay, i may be going crazy but slap this on frame one of a flash file and
observe the output:
//
var incrementNum:Number = 0;
var oldNum:Number = 0;
var resultNum:Number =0;
onEnterFrame =
You can also store references to functions in an array and call them from the
array.
FuncArr= []
FuncArr[0]=func0
FuncArr[1]=func1
// call func 1
FuncArr[1]()
// call a load of funcs in sequence
Var len=FuncArr.length
For(var i=0; ilen; i++){
FuncArr[i]()
}
M
-Original Message-
oaky great cheers :D
On 09/08/06, Michael Kneib [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?id=tn_13989
Am Mi, 9.08.2006, 16:46, schrieb mike cann:
Okay, i may be going crazy but slap this on frame one of a flash file
and
observe the output
Are you using remoting? Check out AMFPHP: http://www.amfphp.org/
You don't need to use the XML object to send your POST, just to receive it.
Create your XML object after you get your result back.
var my_xml = new XML();my_xml.onLoad = function(success){if (success){trace(
state.
.wtf?
Mike Pearce
Nectarine +61 3 9687 7820
http://www.nectarine.com.au/ www.nectarine.com.au
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman
Now there's an interesting problem.
I have one really awkward idea. I'm assuming the XML structure is
something like this?
?xml version=1.0?
root
entry
entry-data /
!--12 more entry-data nodes--
/entry
!--3499 more entry nodes--
/root
- Use
You seem to be thinking of numbers as if they are stored like strings.
They aren't.
RGB colors are stored as 3-byte (24-bit) numbers.
For example, red looks like this in binary:
b
...which is the same thing as this in hexadecimal:
0xFF
... which is the
] On Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 3:25 PM
To: 'Flashcoders mailing list'
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Problems getting the brightness of a
colorreturnedfrom getPixel
You seem to be thinking of numbers as if they are stored like strings.
They aren't.
RGB colors are stored as 3-byte
Hi Mike,
I didnt know FlashCoders was a place to get one's code
reviewed for silly mistakes in logic. Hence I just cleared
your way from thinking its an AS3 problem. Anyways glad to
know you figured it out.
You're right, it's not and I did think it was an AS2 - AS3 translation
Well my frustration was stoked by the vague error messages being churned
out by the compiler. But no sweat.
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Supriya
Sent: 28 July 2006 09:40
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re:
We're discussing on the HaXe mailing list whether it would be possible
to decompile from Flash 8/AS2 swfs to Haxe, then (when the support is
added) recompile to Flash9/AS3 swfs to help speed up AS2 to AS3
conversion.
Obvious stumbling block at the moment is nothing decompiles to HaXe, but
as a
If you REALLY wanted to be fancy, you could have it accept an array of
words *not* to capitalize (unless they are the first word). For example:
var lowerCaseWords:Array = [a, an, and, of, the];
trace(a tale of two cities.toTitleCase(lowerCaseWords));
trace(THE PRINCE AND THE
Depends on the structure, but, in the end, it sounds like it will boil
down to having some static method for the the document class to find the
movieclip, or the movieclip to find the document class. The simplest
variant of this approach is the Singleton pattern.
Is there only one instance of
a property or method of a null
object reference.
at Timeline0_5bf5ad1effb5f4693f4c3e71f1bcfc7/moveme()
What am I missing here?
And while I'm at it, what's the simple AS3 scripting way (I know the
class way) of doing
myObj.onEnterFrame=function(){
this.x+=1
//Etc.
}
Cheers
Mike
function moveme(event:Event):void{
You aren't passing in an event there... so perhaps that is
causing the vomit?
The event gets passed auotmatically, it traces out fine
On 7/27/06, Supriya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
its not an AS3 problem, its a small problem in your logic in the
for(var i=0; il; i++){
Not
for(var i=0; i=l; i++){
M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mike Mountain
Sent: 27 July 2006 17:17
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] AS3 scripting, first try - some Q's
Anyone got an answer to the second part:
what's the simple AS3 scripting way (I know the class way) of doing
myObj.onEnterFrame=function(){
this.x+=1
//Etc.
}
Cheers
Mike
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options
It's a hack, but you can do:
as.func1.apply(_root);
Might be better to change func1 so that it takes a MovieClip as a
parameter. Then you could just do:
as.func1(_root);
(Although that's still a bit of a hack.)
--
T. Michael Keesey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Random thought--is it possible that the initialization code for the
loaded SWF is throwing an error? (I have no idea if this would stop
onLoadInit from being called, though.)
It's a long shot, but
--
T. Michael Keesey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Yup good to see, an optimised remove duplicate items would be good, or
have I missed it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Hans Wichman
Sent: 26 July 2006 10:41
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Array
Doh, scrolled right past it, nice work.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of janosch
Sent: 26 July 2006 11:04
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Array Empowerment
uniq is the appropriate function
Janosch
Ive had this problem using the f8 remoting files. It seems to fix
itself for me by restarting flash...
Bbt Lists wrote:
Has anyone had this issue, or a way around it? I had searched google,
and found references to using the mx2004 files to replace the F8 ones,
but i do not have access to
- nitems looks like number of items (i.e., length); why not
numSetItems or countSetItem?
Yeah, I didn't think it was very descriptive either, but it returns
the
number of non null/undefined items in the array (which, at the moment,
I
don't see as very useful, hehe). Perhaps it could be
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of js
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 7:01 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Array Empowerment
I was fairly surprised to see that if(this.length == 0) is considered
sloppy
Why have the step with the semicolon? You can just do this:
var foo:Array = [a, b, c, [d, e, [d, e, [d, e, [d,
e, f, [g, [h]], [[], i], j];
var fooFlat:Array = foo.toString().split(,);
Potential problems with this approach:
- It does not preserve the type of the elements, converting them all
Question totally unrelated to implementation and optimization:
Why do the function names have underscores when camel-humped names are
the customary syntax in ActionScript (and Java, and Javascript...)?
Some of the names could be clearer:
- nitems looks like number of items (i.e., length); why
My not use childNodes?
mainMenu.firstChild.childNodes[0].childNodes[0].firstChild.nodeValue;
mainMenu.firstChild.childNodes[0].childNodes[1].firstChild.nodeValue;
Jose Maria Barros wrote:
Hi,
i have the xml:
root
pic
imagehttp://www.kirupa.com/developer/mx2004/pg/kresge.jpg /image
You could try using loadVars and return a status in xml rather than
loadVariablesNum...
var myVars:LoadVars = new LoadVars;
var xml_results:XML = new XML();
xml_results.ignoreWhite = true;
xml_results.onLoad = function(success:Boolean){
if (success){
} else {
}
}
/medialab.jpg
/imagep
/pic
/root
On 7/24/06, Mike Boutin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My not use childNodes?
mainMenu.firstChild.childNodes[0].childNodes[0].firstChild.nodeValue;
mainMenu.firstChild.childNodes[0].childNodes[1].firstChild.nodeValue;
Jose Maria Barros wrote:
Hi,
i have the xml:
root
Thanks for all the posts. Yes this is what i ended up doing, i just
figured there might be a way around it.. thanks again!
Mike
eric dolecki wrote:
yup - seems like a scoping issue...
if all the radiobutton mcw were nested in a larger, single mc, they could
all register with the radiobutton
You can actually just use (!var) in most cases.
if (!undefined) {
// This will always run.
trace(undefined);
}
if (!null) {
// This will always run.
trace(null);
}
if (!false) {
// This will always run.
trace(false);
}
if (!0) {
// This will
It's useful in traces.
--
T. Michael Keesey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rifled
Cloaca
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:34 AM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Difference between null and undefined?
This is
say ...
if (!foo.length) {
// This will never run.
trace('foo.length');
}
--
T. Michael Keesey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:07 AM
To: 'Flashcoders mailing list'
Subject: RE
That's what I thought, too, but when I did the test, !foo evaluated as
true.
trace(!foo); /// Outputs true.
--
T. Michael Keesey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of janosch
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:39 AM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
(Group Name: +rb.groupName);
}
Mike Boutin
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized
case you do not check for the pure
value, but for the value, saved in a variable:
a = foo;
trace(!a); // false
Janosch
Mike schrieb:
That's what I thought, too, but when I did the test, !foo evaluated
as
true.
trace(!foo); /// Outputs true.
--
T. Michael Keesey
XHTML or HTML 4.0?
If the former, you can just use the XML object. If the latter ... have
fun
--
T. Michael Keesey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sara
Czyzewicz
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 1:46 PM
To:
We definitely can do this, but it may amount to reinventing the wheel.
Do you suggest this in lieu of Cairngorm and ARP? Are there things about
these frameworks that make them undesirable?
Mike
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your
, when I test locally, everything works. Is it RealServer? Is it a
cross-domain issue (and if it is, why's the file playing to begin with and why
do the flvs work)? I'm totally at a loss at trouble shooting this.
-mike
___
Flashcoders
one of the PHP
proxy classes.
Mike
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe
://www.osflash.org/localconnection
hth,
Mike
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe
A couple questions for you Jeff:
1. What version of Flash player are you targeting?
2. How are you generating the swfs?
Mike
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com
I find this happens when two classes import each other. Just compile
again and the error goes away. Weird little bug that will hopefully go
away in Flash 9.
(I'm assuming you don't actually have two classes both named
'ConnectDots'.)
--
T. Michael Keesey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
this doesnt sound like a good idea as anyone can download your .swf and
decompile it then change that SELECT * statement to a DROP statement with
ease.
On 12/07/06, Jose Maria Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now im working on a project that involves SQL Server, ASP , XML and
flash..and i think
I use FutureQuest (http://www.futurequest.net/) and love their service.
I've never had a problem for over four years. They have PHP, MySQL and
Ruby; shared and dedicated hosting; I can't say enough good things about
them quite honestly.
hth,
Mike
Bernard is right. Take a look at these resources before you go live with
your application:
http://del.icio.us/search/?all=PHP+security
Mike
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http
I'm gonna jump on this thread with a more specific question.
One person mentioned www.hostbrigade.com, which offers, among other
things:
# Full root access
# Install anything you want
Any recommendations for other hosts like this?
--
Mike Keesey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicolas
Cannasse
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 1:16 AM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Abstract classes in AS3?
Mike Keesey wrote:
I don't really care whether they allow private
I believe you would need to use something such as php for this.
kelly snyder wrote:
I am trying to find a way to get my Flash file read from and write to
ASCII text files. I would like to run the swf or exe file on my local
machine, with an input test file and an output text file in the same
http://www.hostbrigade.com/ - These guys are great.
Suzanne Harmon wrote:
I am looking for a good Php host with decent customer support. Anyone
have recommendations?
Thanks in advance
Suzanne
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your
That does seem stupid and completely pointless. I use private
constructors all the time.
Is there an official rationale for this?
--
T. Michael Keesey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cédric
Néhémie
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 11:30 AM
Yeah, but what if you're doing an enumeration class, like so:
class TransitionState {
private function TransitionState() {
}
public static var NOT_PLAYED_IN:TransitionState = new
TransitionState();
public static var PLAYING_IN:TransitionState = new
I don't really care whether they allow private constructors or not, as
long as they provide some way of accomplishing the same thing.
Specifically, I want to be able to:
1) Limit the number of instances of certain classes (singletons,
enumerations).
2) Have methods which are not attached to
-
Has anyone seen any comparisons with the Shockwave player?
I'd love to know if AS3 can out-perform Lingo.
Thanks,
Mike
Nick Weekes wrote:
Andreas, you got any links to your benchmarking? Id be interested to see
them (Im not planning on migrating to AS3 just yet).
-Original Message
Yes i believe its a scope issue also, i solved this by storing the
callback functions at _root.
Mike BOutin
Rich Rodecker wrote:
is it a scoping issue? maybe trying delegating the click to a function
in the same scope as the service...
sendMessage.click = Delegate.create(this, onButtonClick
Hey Julian,
I feel your pain. Take a look at this example:
http://www.randomusa.com/flash/downloads/tojulian.zip
Mike Britton
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http
Perhaps, but you never know: someone on this list may have a better
solution for your problem.
Mike
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo
the framework via
ActionScript.
If you just want to use ActionScript and no framework, then mxmlc
will also compile an .as file.
Hope that helps...
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jul 5, 2006, at 11:58 AM, Zárate wrote:
Hi all,
I want to start playing with AS3 so I´ve downloaded the Flex 2
);
}
}
}
Then compile like so:
mxmlc HelloWorld.as
That will compile a SWF.
If you want to use the Flex Framework, then you :
a. have to use the technique I describe below
b. have to take the size hit that using the framework entails
Hope that helps...
mike chambers
perhaps create a black sqare movieclip then draw that to your bitmap? Not
sure if that was is any quicker than set pixel..
On 29/06/06, Andreas Rønning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know a fast way to draw a pixel perfect rectangle onto a
bitmapData instance without a loop and setPixel? I
Registration ClassFile??
Thanks in advance for any information you can offer,
Mike
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 June 2006 14:02
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Text arching
You might like this:
DEMO class v1:
missed something?
Have you tried creating a blank dynamic text field in the root of your movie
and just embedding the characters there? Everything creating dynamically after
that should have them.
-mike
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change
Cuepoints can be used with mp3 as well as flv.
Mike
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier
(); is not strictly necessary; I'm just anal.)
--
Mike Keesey
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier
But if you run the XML test first, and the LoadVars test just loads
the cached file
--
T. Michael Keesey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim
Kremens
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 5:39 AM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re:
Pretty simple:
import flash.net.FileReference;
class package.FileReferenceListener extends Object {
public function FileReferenceListener () {
super();
}
private function onCancel(file:FileReference):Void {
trace(onCancel: + file.name);
That is really weird. One question--are the files being loaded the same
size? (Or, better yet, the same file.)
--
Mike Keesey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim
Kremens
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 1:17 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Seems like a hack to me, from both the AJAX programming and Flash
programming perspective.
Mike
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
setting to export it to frame 2 rather than 1, but it is unavailable to
change (the field is disabled). Am I missing something here? ;) Thanks!
Mike
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Boutin
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 1:52 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: [Flashcoders] Export frame option disabled
Hey everyone,
Im creating a preloader and I notice that it doesnt start until about
90% done loading the file. I believe this is because my ui
301 - 400 of 886 matches
Mail list logo
