Hi,
I have some question.
I'm missing spin property in attitude-indicator property list. It isn't there?
I also want to ask if it is possible visualize hotspots, I remember that I
read some plans about it.
Thanks,
Madr
--
Martin Dressler
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jim Wilson writes:
:-) BTW the menu work is looking great!
Thanks -- feel free to try your hand at a dialog or two. This is a
good time for experimentation.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
Martin Dressler writes:
I'm missing spin property in attitude-indicator property list. It
isn't there?
It's showing up for me. Do you have the latest CVS code?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
I believe something has to be fixed before:
http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/bitmap/FGFS/Building_01.png
Do you know how you get there ? This happens when you try taxiing below the
airport building :-))
I suppose this should be changed before you start offering bridges to the
people -
Alex Perry writes:
In any case, I'll try to give the instruments a careful flight
testing.
Thanks. Please look especially carefully at the magnetic compass -- I
tried to copy your algorithm, but I'm not sure that all the
acceleration and turning errors made it through.
It's now up to
Hi,
In my ongoing quest to implement a FSD (protocol used in SquakBox) client
for FlightGear, I've read the Protocol Info document located at
http://www.simclients.com/ProtoDev-InfoForProspectiveDevelopers.doc (word
document, 103 kb) and at page 2 section 4 it reads:
The group is protected by
David Megginson writes:
Jim Wilson writes:
:-) BTW the menu work is looking great!
Thanks -- feel free to try your hand at a dialog or two. This is a
good time for experimentation.
David,
From very brief look, the File-Reset function does not appear
to be functional.
Also, the
Mathew,
The group is protected by an agreement, made between each
developer and the
group (as a whole) which prevents disclosure of privileged communications.
Neither my flying skills nor my spare time are sufficient for taking part in
Vatsim :-(
However, I know that there are a few
On Mon 27. January 2003 13:40, you wrote:
Martin Dressler writes:
I'm missing spin property in attitude-indicator property list. It
isn't there?
It's showing up for me. Do you have the latest CVS code?
All the best,
David
Hmmm, It is there, but I'm still missing it in coments in
Martin Dressler writes:
On Mon 27. January 2003 13:40, you wrote:
Martin Dressler writes:
I'm missing spin property in attitude-indicator property list. It
isn't there?
It's showing up for me. Do you have the latest CVS code?
All the best,
David
Hmmm, It is there,
On Monday, January 27, 2003, at 01:27 pm, Michael Basler wrote:
Neither my flying skills nor my spare time are sufficient for taking
part in
Vatsim :-(
Me too ...
However, I know that there are a few competiting networks a la Vatsim
present or just emerging and I read several quite sharp
Martin Spott writes:
I believe something has to be fixed before:
http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/bitmap/FGFS/Building_01.png
Do you know how you get there ? This happens when you try taxiing below the
airport building :-))
I suppose this should be changed before you start
Martin Spott writes:
I believe something has to be fixed before:
http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/bitmap/FGFS/Building_01.png
Do you know how you get there ? This happens when you try taxiing below the
airport building :-))
Yes, I've noticed the same thing. I thought
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Also, the presets dialog doesn't appear to do anything when you click
ok or apply.
OK and apply copy the values from the dialog to the presets; they do
not apply the presets. We probably need to make that more intuitive.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson,
Thanks
Only one small note to David. Shouldn't be gui directory in base package
named Gui. All other directories start with capital letter.
Madr
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Norman Vine writes:
3) What is really needed for flying under bridges is a general
purpose 3D collision detection support which the scenery hitlist
routine is not. It is only designed to report the height of the
highest point at the location of the intersection with the terrrain
scenegraph
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 20:28:38 +1100,
Mathew McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
01c2c604$edb005a0$390a32d2@m7r4m2:
Basically they are making this protocol proprietary so no one can
develop crap clients.
...and in the process, _junks_ any and all open source licensed crap
linux
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Is there any mechanism yet to apply the presets? I haven't been
able to find it.
Yes, the big button at the top that says Revert to Defaults (since
we're setting default values). Please feel free to play around with
the dialog to make it more intuitive.
Also when
Martin Spott writes:
I believe something has to be fixed before:
http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/bitmap/FGFS/Building_01.png
[...]
1) Don't know why there is a large unrendered area
What you're calling 'unrendered area' is supposed to be the untextured roof
of the new
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 02:17:05PM -0800, ace project wrote:
Well, the engine I'm building is designed to be as
non-intrusive as possible (it loads as a FGSubsystem,
so only a entry in main.cpp is needed and it starts up
only if it sees a entry in the properties list when
the Flight Gear
David Megginson writes:
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Yes, the big button at the top that says Revert to Defaults (since
we're setting default values). Please feel free to play around with
the dialog to make it more intuitive.
Ok, will do ...
Also when I try to select File-Reset I get No
..
Hi and thanks for the info. I was kind of expecting
there to be a coordinated
effort to add multiplayer support to FlightGear,
with various tasks on the
table and regular commits so everyone could see what
was going on. From what
you've said it sounds like various multiplayer
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 09:00:40 -0600,
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In many of the higher end commercial sims they build invisible walls
underneath bridges to discourage illegal or unwise behavior ... :-)
Curt.
...which would warrant both runtime and
Arnt Karlsen writes:
...which would warrant both runtime and compile time options like
--build-invisible-walls-under-bridges, and --tip-fbi... ;-)
I'd prefer --tip-interpol: after all, this is an international
project.
Sometimes there are legitimate reasons to fly under something -- not
JSBsim as today in CVS doesn't compile with MSVC 7. Classes FGTurboJet,
FGTurboProp, FGTurboShaft are not in the JSBsim namespace. I don't know
if it is intended. If yes, there is a need for a 'using namespace JSBSim;'
directive. In addition, the map in FGSwitch doesn't compile with const,
that is
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 12:27, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
JSBsim as today in CVS doesn't compile with MSVC 7. Classes FGTurboJet,
FGTurboProp, FGTurboShaft
These can be removed from the project. They should not be in FG cvs and
I will remove them shortly.
are not in the JSBsim namespace. I
Brandon Bergren writes:
Jim Wilson wrote:
Root? I doubt it. Although, I suppose it _will_ run under root just like
anything else ;-)
Best,
Jim
Moments later, the well-crafted exploit hits the end of the buffer and
makes the jump to kernel space.
(reminds me of Unix Wars ;)
27 matches
Mail list logo
