: david; state: Exp; lines: +7 -0
Set initial levels for fuel tanks (not quite working yet).
So it looks like we haven't been using the JSBsim supplied value
for fuel, at least on the stock c172, since mid january.
On Friday 11 October 2002 02:50 am, John Check
On Friday 11 October 2002 01:17 am, Jon Berndt wrote:
Whats the deal with the x24b fuel wise? That's missing a consumables
section as are the shuttle and x15
??
The JSBSim config files have fuel loaded for the X15, the X24B, the C310,
the C172, etc. But NOT the shuttle (we just use it as
On Friday 11 October 2002 07:02 am, David Megginson wrote:
John Check writes:
Dunno. I checked a few revisions back and didn't see anything.
I'm committing wet tanks shortly.
Remember that I just fixed FlightGear to stop picking up defaults from
c172.xml. Hmm.
All the best,
David
On Friday 11 October 2002 08:09 am, Norman Vine wrote:
David Megginson writes:
Instead, we should set the appropriate switches to 'on' in
preferences.xml or c172-*-set.xml so that the user can override. For
the starter, a default to 'on' is clearly not what we want.
NIT
*-*-set.xml so
On Friday 11 October 2002 08:20 am, David Megginson wrote:
Norman Vine writes:
Instead, we should set the appropriate switches to 'on' in
preferences.xml or c172-*-set.xml so that the user can override. For
the starter, a default to 'on' is clearly not what we want.
NIT
On Thursday 10 October 2002 10:49 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I'm not sure what changed, but I can no longer start the c310u3a-3d
engines. They will fire and turn over, but as soon as I disengage the
starter, they spin back down and refuse to run. Also, they no longer
come up running by
On Thursday 10 October 2002 10:49 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I'm not sure what changed, but I can no longer start the c310u3a-3d
engines. They will fire and turn over, but as soon as I disengage the
starter, they spin back down and refuse to run. Also, they no longer
come up running by
On Friday 11 October 2002 12:05 am, Jon Berndt wrote:
Who emptied the fuel tanks?
Dunno. I checked a few revisions back and didn't see anything.
I'm committing wet tanks shortly.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Check
Sent
On Friday 11 October 2002 12:08 am, John Check wrote:
On Friday 11 October 2002 12:05 am, Jon Berndt wrote:
Who emptied the fuel tanks?
Dunno. I checked a few revisions back and didn't see anything.
I'm committing wet tanks shortly.
I forgot to put it in the log message, but I also moved
On Friday 11 October 2002 12:15 am, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Is this a side effect of no longer getting the C172 defaults?
That sounds like a reasonable deduction. I'm checking the rest
of the planes to see if we need to gas up. I noticed the yasim planes
have thier own definition for fuel
I was going through the c172 variants and adding the electrical system
and I fired up the c172-larcsim. It's got a major problem. It just sits on the
runway no matter how much throttle you give it.
I took a quick look at the xml file in case it was something obvious.
I gave comparative analysis
On Wednesday 09 October 2002 10:19 am, Jim Wilson wrote:
The question is what would you do with it if you had it?:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2058978645
It's a strange world.
Best,
Jim
That would depend on whether or not the drive was wiped
On Friday 04 October 2002 05:21 am, Bernie Bright wrote:
On Fri, 04 Oct 2002 01:51:32 -0400
John Check [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 03 October 2002 11:52 pm, John Wojnaroski wrote:
With the latest CVS for SimGear and FG (updated 20:00 PDT) seeing
Unable to detect the current
On Friday 04 October 2002 02:33 pm, Boslough, Mark B wrote:
I downloaded and built the current stable cvs version.
When I run it I get the complaint:
Base package check failed ... Found version 0.7.11pre1 at: .
Please upgrade to version0.8.0
I'll have to check whats going on with that. I
On Thursday 03 October 2002 11:52 pm, John Wojnaroski wrote:
With the latest CVS for SimGear and FG (updated 20:00 PDT) seeing
Unable to detect the current language
./test: line 5 9148 Segmentation fault yada yada yada
Wasn't paying attention to the discussions on internationalization
I just tried a fresh build and I noticed the control surface animations
aren't working. The prop animation works fine.
Also (this has been like this for a while) if I go to view mode
and change the view angle on the vertical axis then center the view
(shift+keypad8) the panel reappears but the
On Friday 27 September 2002 9:47 am, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Jon Berndt writes:
Interesting ... are these people aware of FlightGear? It looks like
they are doing cockpit UI type research (?) and they could plug right
into FlightGear to drive their displays.
Huh? I read into it that
On Monday 23 September 2002 4:02 pm, David Megginson wrote:
I've started a new module, src/Systems/, for major aircraft systems.
Currently it contains only a very simplistic vacuum system hard-wired
to engine #1, but we can improve it easily (look at
VacuumSystem::update in
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 5:58 am, Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
John Check [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 2:53 am, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
It also seems that only Data/SkyClouds/field56.cld is needed.
I tried to remove the other files and it works.
Let me try
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 10:38 am, Alex Perry wrote:
The stable tree is for all intents and purposes the last released
version. For SimGear and FlightGear you have to maintain 2 trees if
you want access to the stable or dev versions. The basepackage CVS you
can access either, but
On Monday 22 July 2002 12:13 am, Jonathan Polley wrote:
I would like to update the preferences.xml file to include comments
telling folks like myself how to read/modify the file. I have commented
my local version (mirrors CVS), but would like to insert it into CVS. To
take a look at an
On Thursday 18 July 2002 7:43 pm, David Megginson wrote:
Alex Romosan writes:
i was flying the a4 trying to dodge buildings when i crashed into one
of them. the problem is i was some distance away from it as you can
see from the picture at http://caliban.lbl.gov/a4_crash.pnm (it's a
On Sunday 14 July 2002 7:33 am, David Megginson wrote:
Victoria Welch writes:
As for jscal, I am unable to locate it for mandrake. The source I found
(which seems to have been an early version ?!?!?!?!) wants to be
compiled into the kernel and I find that just too odd.
I'm very
On Saturday 13 July 2002 8:26 am, Jim Wilson wrote:
Victoria Welch [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Assuming that I have the same results I have had in the past, I'll track
down that Docs/README.Joystick.html wherever plib hides it docs.
Interesting that looks like one with the same name in the fg
On Wednesday 03 July 2002 1:59 pm, Cameron Moore wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Check) [2002.07.03 00:32]:
On Wednesday 03 July 2002 1:19 am, Cameron Moore wrote:
I decided to make a couple splash screens out of some nice screenshots,
and I'm curious how they look on other systems
On Monday 01 July 2002 4:37 am, Erik Hofman wrote:
-snip-
I think I've found the problem. I grab the base package using rsync, and
that version doesn't seem to be up-to-date. Even the new crop textures
aren't included yet.
Could someone please take a look at that?
Erik
It's fixed now,
On Tuesday 02 July 2002 10:37 am, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
We'll probably all have a lot more fun and work together a lot more
effectively if leave the political discussions to other forums. :-)
Regards,
Curt.
Second that ;)
___
Flightgear-devel
On Tuesday 02 July 2002 7:39 am, Martin Spott wrote:
FYI, there are a lot of new FGFS logo items available.
http://www.cafepress.com/cp/store/store.aspx?storeid=fgfs_gear
The mugs look nice but I have to notice that the colour on the FlightGear
Logo Mug starts disappearing after only a
On Wednesday 03 July 2002 1:19 am, Cameron Moore wrote:
I decided to make a couple splash screens out of some nice screenshots,
and I'm curious how they look on other systems -- mainly if they are too
dark. They are straight out of FG -- no tampering except for the text,
of course. If you
On Monday 01 July 2002 11:53 am, Alex Perry wrote:
I think I've found the problem. I grab the base package using rsync, and
that version doesn't seem to be up-to-date. Even the new crop textures
aren't included yet.
It's on my machine, but John Check had a cron job that pushd-updated
On Monday 01 July 2002 6:14 pm, John Check wrote:
On Monday 01 July 2002 11:53 am, Alex Perry wrote:
I think I've found the problem. I grab the base package using rsync,
and that version doesn't seem to be up-to-date. Even the new crop
textures aren't included yet.
It's on my
CVS for base package is down for a little bit.
I'll have it back up ASAP.
John
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Okay, we're back in business.
J
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
On Friday 21 June 2002 8:41 am, Jim Wilson wrote:
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Well, it spoiled the fun for me. FPS from 10-15 down to 1 fps :-(
Erik
Hmmm...that seems a bit extreme. The model as a whole is a lot more
complex.
Best,
Jim
On Friday 21 June 2002 10:06 pm, Major A wrote:
Hi,
another nasty question from a user who hasn't bothered browsing
through the source code: I have found in the CVS of FlightGear
recently that the autopilot's altitude function doesn't work. It
reliably steers me into the ground no matter
On Wednesday 19 June 2002 1:23 am, Andy Ross wrote:
snip
I have backgrounds for some of these that I did a while back, but
never integrated. Take a look at
http://www.plausible.org/andy/gauges/all.png for the stuff that I have
ready. These were all generated by a little perl (and
On Tuesday 11 June 2002 12:10 pm, Norman Vine wrote:
fgfs --help
exits with an error message about 'options.xml' missing
Shouldn't this be in fgfsbase ??
Cheers
Norman
Curt sent me the file to commit. Something is up on the server end.
Unfortunately, I'm on jury duty today and have
On Tuesday 11 June 2002 1:32 pm, Andy Ross wrote:
Norman Vine wrote:
fgfs --help
exits with an error message about 'options.xml' missing
Shouldn't this be in fgfsbase ??
Apparently, it is in CVS. But the permissions on the file are
incorrect:
turban:/andy/src/fgfsbase$ cvs up
On Monday 10 June 2002 11:41 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Norman Vine writes:
FWIW
I haven't been able to get an update from the fgfsbase cvs all day
I can connect OK but then cvs gets stuck responding with
cvs server: [ $time ] waiting for cvsroot's lock in
On Monday 03 June 2002 3:22 pm, Andy Ross wrote:
Alex Romosan wrote:
it seems to be back. things were working on friday, but this morning
when i tried to fly the 747 out of KOAK i get this:
It looks like you're using the 747.xml file out of the current
fgfsbase CVS. As of the last fix,
On Monday 03 June 2002 6:18 pm, Andy Ross wrote:
John Check wrote:
Andy Ross wrote:
Checkins to the base package tend to lag the source tree by a few
days. I attached the new file to my mail on Sunday (subject: YASim
747-400 climb).
A few days? That really shouldn't be. Everybody
On Saturday 01 June 2002 11:32 pm, Jim Wilson wrote:
BTW I have the X15 with all the parts labeled. If someone is interested in
doing the xml for animations I'll put it in cvs (it's based on the gear
down version).
I beleive I committed that model. I could be wrong
J
On Sunday 02 June 2002 5:16 pm, Gene Buckle wrote:
..also, how about a _generic_ Mooney Bonanza? About 300 of
Mooney didn't build the Bonanza, Beechcraft did. I have to admit though,
a huge formation of forked-tail doctor killers would be a cool thing to
see. :)
g.
forked-tail doctor
On Saturday 01 June 2002 11:43 am, Michael Basler wrote:
Dear developers,
I received the June issue of FlightXPress, a German language (actually THE
German language) language journal on Flight simulation
(http://www.flightxpress.de/) today.
snip
Unfortunately the review on FG as such is
On Monday 20 May 2002 12:19 am, Alex Perry wrote:
How about we have a missing model in the same way as we have a
missing texture ? A ten meter cube with that texture on each side ?
we used to fall back to the glider model
I get a Fatal error when trying to use some aircraft because I
On Wednesday 15 May 2002 12:12 pm, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Christian Mayer -- Wednesday 15 May 2002 17:39:
David Megginson wrote:
/environment/pressure-inhg
/environment/density-sea-level-slugft3
[...]
But I'm really concerned that these values aren't in SI units.
So most of the
On Monday 13 May 2002 7:38 pm, Christian Mayer wrote:
snip
As written earlier: I didn't like EMACS as I tried it (c'mon, which sane
person programms in LISP?). I'll rather try vi (I'm also using it on a
few big HPUX at work). Oh, AFAIK you can replace the internal editor of
KDevelop with VIM
On Tuesday 30 April 2002 9:42 am, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
What are these indications ?
-Fred
Messages with klez attachments and forged from headers with
list participant addresses.
- Original Message -
From: John Check [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL
On Tuesday 30 April 2002 11:36 am, David Megginson wrote:
John Check writes:
Messages with klez attachments and forged from headers with
list participant addresses.
Yes, having my return address spoofed by someone's Outlook was the
last straw for me. At risk of offending some of my
On Tuesday 30 April 2002 12:05 pm, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
All Outlook users should install security patches from Windows Update.
Version 5 has serious flaws and start automatically any attachement when
a message is previewed.
John is right, these viruses fetch their victims in every mail
I started integrating the UIUC stuff into Aircraft/
and part of Michaels strategy is a Aircraft/UIUC
for the UIUC configs.
While we're at it how about moving the Aircraft-yasim
directory the same way? Comments?
TTYL
J
___
Flightgear-devel mailing
On Tuesday 30 April 2002 7:33 pm, Jim Wilson wrote:
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
There are obviously some aerodynamic changes in the 172R as well as
the more obvious powerplant and panel changes. Our JSBSim model uses
mostly the standard 172/182 coefficients that Roskam
On Tuesday 30 April 2002 8:52 pm, David Megginson wrote:
John Check writes:
I started integrating the UIUC stuff into Aircraft/
and part of Michaels strategy is a Aircraft/UIUC
for the UIUC configs.
While we're at it how about moving the Aircraft-yasim
directory the same way
On Tuesday 30 April 2002 10:04 pm, David Megginson wrote:
John Check writes:
I'd prefer Aircraft/Aero/whatever. When you think about it, everything
in a Aircraft/whatever directory except the jsb config file is cosmetic.
A clear division there is a good thing
That sounds great
On Monday 29 April 2002 6:25 am, Marcel Wittebrood wrote:
IIRC windows requires commandline arguments (or parts thereof)
to be quoted.
Thanks John,
I added localhost and indeed the program opens the channel. Maybe I will
add some input- checking on this when I get more experience.
I
On Monday 29 April 2002 6:30 pm, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 16:19:08 -,
Jim Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Marcio Shimoda [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I want to make a movie with FG running, but I don't have a video
card to capture the
I'm seeing some indications that one of our win32 people
may be infected with W32.Klez.
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This would be a good time to update virus dats and
have a mcafee.
Thanks
John
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 26 April 2002 9:56 am, Marcel Wittebrood wrote:
Dear developers,
I work with cygwin under windows 2000 logged in as administrator.
Now I have a few questions :
I used the following argument to be able to look at the variable tree
with telnet:
--props=socket,bi,5,5500,tcp
One
On Friday 26 April 2002 10:50 pm, Alex Perry wrote:
You should have a look at the bindings in your joystick.xml file
as there a bunch of defaults in there that you probably won't like.
I locally have a chproducts.xml file which is used inside the
preferences.xml file instead of the standard
On Saturday 27 April 2002 12:44 am, Simon Fowler wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 09:33:23PM -0700, Alex Perry wrote:
For example, say I'm a long-time X-Plane user and just can't live
with the default FG key bindings. I could create my very own
~/.fgfs/keyboard.xml and completely
On Thursday 25 April 2002 1:23 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
David Megginson writes:
Alex Perry writes:
Are you going to do an interior view ?
Do flying saucers have windows?
Well, we know Mr. Gate's has a monopoly here on earth, but it's
unclear if this monopoly extends significantly
On Thursday 25 April 2002 3:59 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
John Check writes:
On Thursday 25 April 2002 1:23 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
David Megginson writes:
Alex Perry writes:
Are you going to do an interior view ?
Do flying saucers have windows?
Well, we know Mr
On Thursday 25 April 2002 5:57 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Jon S Berndt writes:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:28:12 -0500 (CDT)
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just took the latest 3D Cessna 310 u3a (in cvs) for a
spin and wow!
I hadn't looked at this for a while and it's really
On Thursday 25 April 2002 7:19 pm, Jonathan Polley wrote:
On Thursday, April 25, 2002, at 05:56 PM, Jon S Berndt wrote:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 20:31:51 +0200
Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do flying saucers have windows?
Word has it they use Linux, actually.
..how about the
I noticed a few oddities with the tower view after
flying a bit.
This is the first view:
http://rockfish.net/fg/towerviewfunk.jpg
You can see the runway lights and cloud layer are misplaced.
In the next view, the cloud layer is scooting along. It looks
way cool, but shouldn't be happening.
On Monday 22 April 2002 07:39, David Megginson wrote:
Currently, the 2D panel displayed in the 3D model is a kludge. It
works enough of the time that you can fly, but some strange things
happen from time to time:
1. The 2D panel instruments show through any 3D objects that should
On Friday 19 April 2002 04:34 am, you wrote:
Jim Wilson wrote:
As for the numbering, how about jumping to 0.8 and then continuing on as
we have? This will look like a pretty major update with the new models
and 3d internal view.
I would think 0.8.0 is reserved for a *stable* release.
On Friday 19 April 2002 01:56 pm, you wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
FlightGear flight simulator software for Linux and Windows
presented by: Andy Ross of the FlightGear project
I'd just like to point out that this is all Alex's fault. I didn't
have anything to do with it (other than saying
On Tuesday 16 April 2002 05:41 pm, you wrote:
Keith Wiley writes:
Well, I autogened it, configured it, and remaked it. This time it
complains that fg_init.cxx is looking for Time/event.hxx on line 111
(which is true) and that there is no such file (which is also
true). There is an event.o,
On Monday 15 April 2002 03:15 am, you wrote:
Hi all
I met one of you guys at LinuxWorld in january, I believe it was Curt, but
Curt had other obligations,I beleive it was me. You were at the conference
session too, right?
not sure. Anyway, I promised him to donate my Cherokee Warrior Info
On Monday 15 April 2002 09:24 am, you wrote:
[... Andrew Ross wrote ...]
Here's a gedanken experiment [...]
A _what_ ? Is this a valid word in your language ? I'm asking because it
definitely has german roots, the word 'gedanken' That's funny,
It is a popular word in the USA.
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 04:26 pm, you wrote:
Again, thanks everyone,
w00T! Congrats David!
g.
Hear hear
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 10:02 pm, you wrote:
Microsoft To Join The Centennial Of Flight Celebration As Part Of
EAA's Countdown To Kitty Hawk Presented By Ford Motor Company
http://www.countdowntokittyhawk.com/news/microsoft.html
Go read it for the full details, but it basically says that
On Monday 08 April 2002 07:41 am, you wrote:
I think a series of demos would be a great idea. It would also be nice
if there were demos for various terrain types (stress testing). I fly
around the Seattle area simply because the mountains drastically impact
frame rate.
Not only the
On Tuesday 26 March 2002 10:23 am, you wrote:
Matthias Heukäufer writes:
I've asked this before on FGFS-Users, but obviously nobody has read my
mail so far:
Will there be a way to get the base package with rsync some day? The
snapshots keep my 14kbps modem busy for a long time.
You can
On Tuesday 26 March 2002 02:17 pm, you wrote:
Will there be a way to get the base package with rsync some day? The
snapshots keep my 14kbps modem busy for a long time.
I've got an experimental server that offers scenery via rsync, but it
is hardly used. I assert that few
On Monday 25 March 2002 11:19 am, you wrote:
On a related note, does anyone know how I could convince CVS that the
base package tar.gz file contents are a suitable starting point for a cvs
update of the base package?
You just need a tarball with all the CVS control files (and nothing
You're really better off doing a network install if at all possible.
Just download a couple of floppies and you're ready to go.
On Sunday 17 March 2002 11:32 am, you wrote:
I forgot to say that Debian must REALLY hide their ISO's - I had to get
these from www.linuxiso.org
Hopefully they
On Sunday 17 March 2002 02:12 am, you wrote:
http://www.suse.com/us/products/suse_linux/i386/games.html
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Gaaah! What an ugly old
On Sunday 17 March 2002 03:57 am, you wrote:
FWIW on a SuSE 7.3 system I had to downgrade (install parallel actually)
autoconf. Just pointing out SuSE needed a little tweak too.
I would'nt call it that way. Autoconf on SuSE-7.3 works pretty nice. The
only tweak is that you have to run
On Friday 15 March 2002 01:57 pm, you wrote:
At 3/15/02, you wrote:
[2] Where should we put the sound files. Right now the files are in
~fbfsbase/Sounds. But different aircraft will have different
sounds. Should these sound files go in the respective ~fgfsbase/Aircraft
directories?
the files are in
~fbfsbase/Sounds. But different aircraft will have different
sounds. Should these sound files go in the respective
~fgfsbase/Aircraft directories?
That's a question for John Check, who is working hard to impose more
order on the sometimes chaotic base package.
snip [3
On Thursday 14 March 2002 03:01 am, you wrote:
Hi
Well, over weekends she's most of the time receiving basic maintenance, so
there's endless time in which I can get some very nice pics, info etc.
Don't quote me on the following, but I heard that when they designed the
DC-3, the engineers
On Sunday 10 March 2002 03:20 pm, you wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 06:05:18 -0500,
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
John Check writes:
Hey David, I was thinking of getting another controller, what was
that one you recommended?
I use a Logitech
On Sunday 10 March 2002 05:23 am, you wrote:
On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 22:08, Jim Wilson wrote:
Fly! uses a 3D cockpit. They use 2D for most of the instrumentation,
switches and knobs, and 3D models for the things that really need it like
levers. More than likely the legability problem is
On Sunday 10 March 2002 05:32 am, you wrote:
I would guess this is a major factor in the relatively small amount of
aircraft development for Fly! ... I know of several people who have
exterior models, but can't contemplate the effort required to assemble a
working panel.
I think this is
On Monday 11 March 2002 02:32 am, you wrote:
Sounds like a worth while (sp?) project!
The XML files get IMVHO more and more confusing.
Maybe lets do the big reorg that Dave speaks about first, with the
hope that things won't change often afterwards. When doing the python
scripts to generate
On Monday 11 March 2002 02:32 am, you wrote:
snip choose a FDM, panel etc, inputs it into the XMLs, generates a small
batch file to call everything, etc.
The set files do what said batch file would do. They are the
top level aircraft config.
___
On Wednesday 06 March 2002 07:17 pm, you wrote:
snip
quite the way you want them. One of the central characteristics of
being a geeky hacker type is a strongly held conviction that the rest
of the world are idiots and are doing things all wrong. :)
Andy
Hahahah! Quick somebody notify
On Monday 04 March 2002 04:54 pm, you wrote:
Can anyone confirm or deny this?
Wasn't there a similar message a few releases ago?
It would be good to check obviously, but IIRC something
just matched the virus sig
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
On Sunday 03 March 2002 04:56 am, you wrote:
Danie Heath wrote:
I finally got the sim running. Here's my first impressions
* Ground texturing excellent, except taxiways and ramps
We are aware of that. But nobody had been able to create new ones ;-)
* I've only seen the
On Friday 01 March 2002 12:45 am, you wrote:
I just checked in YASim changes that allow for more cleaner export of
control output to the property tree (and flaps now extend slowly now,
to boot). But this breaks the XML syntax in an incompatible way, so
you'll need to update your planes in
On Tuesday 26 February 2002 08:52 am, you wrote:
Almost all of the major moving surfaces in the C172 are now animated:
- propeller
- ailerons
- flaps
- rudder
- elevators
The nosewheel still doesn't turn, but I'll add that when I get a
chance. I'll probably start on the DC-3 first,
On Tuesday 26 February 2002 10:14 pm, you wrote:
Jim Wilson writes:
One thing I did notice is that there seems to be significantly
greater CPU overhead when running these models as opposed to some
of the msfs models I've tried. When taking off in chase view
there's a great deal of
On Tuesday 26 February 2002 10:16 pm, you wrote:
Andy Ross writes:
The problem is, typical control setups don't have toe brakes on the
rudder pedals. So I cheated in the initial configuration and mapped
the outer (+/- 0.5-1.0) range of the rudder pedals to the brakes. I
thought
On Sunday 24 February 2002 12:36 pm, you wrote:
Hi,
it seems as there are some files missing in the latest base package CVS.
when I want to run the latest CVS version it come as far as
Reading timezone info from: Z:\FGFS\FlightGear/Timezone/zone.tab
Unable to open file
On Sunday 24 February 2002 03:49 pm, you wrote:
Nope, it isn't in the CVS archive ... someone forgot to check it in ?
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
It's a typo,
Had to make a small change to get latest CVS to build:
Index: src/Main/fg_init.cxx
===
RCS file: /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.7/FlightGear/src/Main/fg_init.cxx,v
retrieving revision 1.150
diff -r1.150 fg_init.cxx
82c82
#include
On Saturday 23 February 2002 10:24 pm, you wrote:
Andy Ross writes:
Undeniably. Unfortunately, the only way to get it closer is to have
people work on and provide feedback for the models. I'll freely admit
that I don't spend much time in the 747 model, because big jets don't
push my
On Friday 22 February 2002 02:01 pm, you wrote:
I started texturing my C172 3D model this morning. It is not finished
(many faces still don't have textures assigned), but it looks
reasonable enough to be the default for the c172* aircraft, rather
than the old yellow and blue glider, so I've
101 - 200 of 295 matches
Mail list logo
