On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Heiko Schulz wrote:
>>
>> Anybody got a screenshot with stopways?
>
> Yep:
> www.hoerbird.net/fgfs-screen-251.jpg
Thanks! Apparently I have to use the scenery from fgdata and not
terrasync. With that, I have stopway with both the old and the new
textures.
--
Cs
>
> Anybody got a screenshot with stopways?
>
> --
Yep:
GIT 04/29/2011 win32 Hudson Build
www.hoerbird.net/fgfs-screen-251.jpg
--
Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
What every C/C++ and Fortran deve
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 15:14:01 Csaba Halász wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Vivian Meazza
>
> wrote:
> > Christian Schmitt wrote
> >
> >> The stopways still work for me here, so there is maybe something wrong
> >> in your fgdata?
> >
> > I have absolutely up-to-date data and source fr
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Vivian Meazza
wrote:
> Christian Schmitt wrote
>>
>> The stopways still work for me here, so there is maybe something wrong in
>> your fgdata?
>
> I have absolutely up-to-date data and source from Git here - still no
> stopways. Is your data up-to-date? But I suspe
Hi,
>
> Yes they do look ugly, because the new textures expose
> problems that are
> hidden by the old ones. Here are some more:
>
> ftp://abbeytheatre2.org.uk:2121/flightgear/Terrain/KSFO-Textures.jpg
> ftp://abbeytheatre2.org.uk:2121/flightgear/Terrain/KSFO-Textures-1.jpg
> ftp://abbeytheatre2
Christian Schmitt wrote
>
> Vivian Meazza wrote:
>
>
> > The main problem is that the taxiway textures expose the workaround that
> > we use because we don't (yet) have curved taxiways. The concrete colour
> > does not blend with the old texture, which is still used for aprons
> etc.,
> > and t
Vivian Meazza wrote:
> The main problem is that the taxiway textures expose the workaround that
> we use because we don't (yet) have curved taxiways. The concrete colour
> does not blend with the old texture, which is still used for aprons etc.,
> and the edge and centre lines also serve to empha
Ryan M
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan M [mailto:tpbspamm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 10 May 2011 03:46
> To: vivian.mea...@lineone.net; FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFC: fgdata merge request 76:
> Improvedairport Textures
>
>
On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 23:46 +0100, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> I’m afraid that the “improved textures” really aren’t an improvement.
> Not only do they not work for taxiways, we have also lost the chevrons
> at the threshold that were quite recently added:
Really? I certainly did *not* touch the stopw
Hi Vivian,
On 09 May 2011, at 00:46, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> I’m afraid that the “improved textures” really aren’t an improvement. Not
> only do they not work for taxiways, we have also lost the chevrons at the
> threshold that were quite recently added:
>
> https://picasaweb.google.com/gijsro
htgear-devel] RFC: fgdata merge request 76:
Improvedairport Textures
Whoops,
should have been: (request #61).
https://gitorious.org/fg/fgdata/merge_requests/61
(Need more coffee, need more coffee, need more coffeee . :-) )
D.
On 07 May 2011, at 10:35, Durk Talsma wrote:
Hi all,
Going
11 matches
Mail list logo
