DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17118] New: - XSLTInputHandler fails with InputSource and URL in constructor

2003-02-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17118. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: FOP API proposal in FOP wiki

2003-02-17 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 05.02.2003 10:32:11 Klaas_Bals wrote: Let me first quickly introduce myself. The compay I work for, Inventive Designers, has a product called Scriptura, which is tool to work with XSLT and XSL-FO. Scriptura consists of a WYSIWYG designer for XSL stylesheets, and an Engine which does the

Re: FOP API proposal in FOP wiki

2003-02-17 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I've just decided not to comment any detail point that has been discussed ATM because I'm currently uneasy with the current process of forming the new API. It's too much of a bottom-up approach IMO. I fear that we're losing ourselves in some details when not even the high-level stuff is decided.

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns

2003-02-17 Thread Christian Geisert
Jeremias Maerki wrote: On 15.02.2003 18:05:31 Christian Geisert wrote: [..] sidenote While doing a quick search for other hyphenation optiones I've found a hyphenation dictionary which is based on the TeX hyphenation tables and licensed under GNU LGPL ... /sidenote Do you have a link? LGPL

Ready for rc2 ?

2003-02-17 Thread Christian Geisert
Hi all, everything done for release candidate 2 ? (except removing hyphenation patterns) Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns

2003-02-17 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 17.02.2003 16:16:55 Christian Geisert wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: On 15.02.2003 18:05:31 Christian Geisert wrote: [..] sidenote While doing a quick search for other hyphenation optiones I've found a hyphenation dictionary which is based on the TeX hyphenation tables and licensed

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns (was: HyphenationTree bug and Portuguese hyphenation file update)

2003-02-17 Thread Togan Muftuoglu
* Jeremias Maerki; [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 14 Feb, 2003 wrote: tr.xml Can't find original file. No licence. Check with author. Well, since I sent out the Turkish hyphenation file I should know where it comes right. The trhyphen.tex is installed from the SuSE 8.1 distro toganm@earth:~/hangar rpm

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns (was: HyphenationTree bug and Portuguese hyphenation file update)

2003-02-17 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I can do that. Thanks for the info. On 17.02.2003 16:47:17 Togan Muftuoglu wrote: * Jeremias Maerki; [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 14 Feb, 2003 wrote: tr.xml Can't find original file. No licence. Check with author. Well, since I sent out the Turkish hyphenation file I should know where it comes

Re: Ready for rc2 ?

2003-02-17 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Yep, from my side. On 17.02.2003 16:19:23 Christian Geisert wrote: everything done for release candidate 2 ? (except removing hyphenation patterns) Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns

2003-02-17 Thread Christian Geisert
Jeremias Maerki wrote: [..] So remove everything excpet fi, pl and pt? Yep, can you do that or shall I? I'll do it. [..] IIUC we don't have to change the way the pattern are read, the problem is the distribuition. No. The patterns in FOP are currently in some XML format. The patterns

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns

2003-02-17 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 17.02.2003 17:11:42 Christian Geisert wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: [..] So remove everything excpet fi, pl and pt? Yep, can you do that or shall I? I'll do it. Thanks! [..] IIUC we don't have to change the way the pattern are read, the problem is the distribuition.

RE: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns

2003-02-17 Thread Victor Mote
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Todos, as I see them: - Remove all incompatible hyphenation files from CVS which are not clear to be ok. - Find Apache-compatible hyphenation files. I found a generic TeX distribution that came with my Red Hat (the relevant files are installed into

Re: Embedding examples (or tutorial) and new directory structure

2003-02-17 Thread David Frankson
http://xml.apache.org/fop/embedding.html lists 6 different examples of embedding fop. Where do I find these example files? I can't find them in any of the distributions. Dave - Original Message - From: Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 11,

Re: Embedding examples (or tutorial) and new directory structure

2003-02-17 Thread Jeremias Maerki
They are currently only available through CVS. If you can wait until Tuesday or Wednesday there will be a 0.20.5rc2 release that will contain the examples. You can also find them here: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-fop/examples/embedding/java/embedding/Attic/ Sorry for the

Re: FOP API proposal in FOP wiki

2003-02-17 Thread J.Pietschmann
Jeremias Maerki wrote: That was my original idea, to build FOP on Avalon, provide an Avalon-based API (for advanced users and Cocoon) but have a standard easy-to-use API that's not Avalon-based. Unfortunately, the Wiki page currently doesn't reflect this. No problem here: edit the proposal to

Re: FOP API proposal in FOP wiki

2003-02-17 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 17.02.2003 21:08:20 J.Pietschmann wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: That was my original idea, to build FOP on Avalon, provide an Avalon-based API (for advanced users and Cocoon) but have a standard easy-to-use API that's not Avalon-based. Unfortunately, the Wiki page currently doesn't

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns

2003-02-17 Thread J.Pietschmann
Christian Geisert wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: - Remove all incompatible hyphenation files from CVS which are not clear to be ok. So remove everything excpet fi, pl and pt? Ouch. I don't think we can distribute FOP without english hyphenation. I just had another look at the LPPL and the

Re: Ready for rc2 ?

2003-02-17 Thread J.Pietschmann
Christian Geisert wrote: everything done for release candidate 2 ? I think so. (except removing hyphenation patterns) Uh! Oh! :-) J.Pietschmann - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email:

Can't bind page number into a variable

2003-02-17 Thread s-oualid
Hi, I would like to put specific attributes on odd or even pages, so I began by looking for a way to check the context pages but I did'nt find anything. So I wanted to bind the fo:page-number / into a variable in order to make some test on it when I want to add specific parameters to my

Re: Plan for HEAD

2003-02-17 Thread J.Pietschmann
Keiron Liddle wrote: What standard are you looking for in a dev release. All commonly used FO features + any goodies that drop in for free. The feature set of 0.20.1 seems to be mostly ok (i.e. keeps and markers mostly broken, large parts of table formatting botched, misplaced link areas, all

Re: FOP API proposal in FOP wiki

2003-02-17 Thread J.Pietschmann
Jeremias Maerki wrote: I just don't want to stand on your toes. If I were afraid of someone stepping on my toes, I'd either shut up or commit the stuff right to CVS and damn the flak! The wiki is a whiteboard for collecting ideas. This includes wiping stuff which did not stand the test of

RE: Markers in areas

2003-02-17 Thread Arved Sandstrom
Joerg, you can freely get rid of that stuff. I originally introduced it when I had more faith in the spec, and thought that the authors knew what they were talking about when it came to to their math. Specifically, the lineage pairs is an abstract concept that I can see no implementation use for.

font problem in fop generated pcl file

2003-02-17 Thread Darryl Nortje
Hi guys. I have an interesting problem that I hope you can help with. I am trying to get the font Garamond printed on my pcl output. When I use pdf as the output the font is on the pdf document. But when I use -pcl as the output, there is no Garamond font there. The following are excerps from

Re: font problem in fop generated pcl file

2003-02-17 Thread Arnd Beißner
Darryl Nortje wrote: I am trying to get the font Garamond printed on my pcl output. When I use pdf as the output the font is on the pdf document. But when I use -pcl as the output, there is no Garamond font there. The following are excerps from the userconfig file, the command line argument

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns

2003-02-17 Thread Christian Geisert
J.Pietschmann schrieb: [..] Ouch. I don't think we can distribute FOP without english hyphenation. Sure we *can* ;-) But if it's a good thing ... I just had another look at the LPPL and the other files. The LPPL file I examined seems to be harmless. The license says we can distribute the

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/hyph cs.xml da.xml de.xml de_DR.xml el.xml en.xml en_US.xml fr.xml nl.xml no.xml pt.xml ru.xml sk.xml tr.xml

2003-02-17 Thread chrisg
chrisg 2003/02/17 20:39:12 Removed: src/hyph Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain cs.xml da.xml de.xml de_DR.xml el.xml en.xml en_US.xml fr.xml nl.xml no.xml pt.xml ru.xml sk.xml tr.xml Log: removed hyphenation patterns with unclear/problematic

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs relnotes.xml

2003-02-17 Thread chrisg
chrisg 2003/02/17 20:41:47 Modified:src/documentation/content/xdocs relnotes.xml Log: added info about removed hyphenation pattern Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +6 -1 xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/relnotes.xml Index: relnotes.xml