bckfnn 2004/02/05 09:58:13
Modified:.status.xml
Log:
Latest changes about property datatypes.
Revision ChangesPath
1.35 +4 -0 xml-fop/status.xml
Index: status.xml
===
RCS file:
bckfnn 2004/02/05 09:59:31
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr LineLayoutManager.java
Log:
Support for text-indent.
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +7 -1 xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/LineLayoutManager.java
Index: LineLayoutManager.java
-Original Message-
From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do *not* share anything you find with the
team--We don't need any you-stole-our-code headaches
from the commercial implementations.
Ok, I won't
No offense, but I think you mistake my intentions here, Glen. If
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 15:28, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
I think this is a bit over the top. Suppose that tomorrow, someone gets
fired at RX or AH, and this ex-employee decides to share some ideas with us.
Are we really going to tell him to take a hike?? Just because of simple
integrity?
-Original Message-
From: Simon Pepping [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have seen this problem too. The PDF renderer is able to render out
of order, but from this bug it seems that the mechanism is
broken. Could it be that the page is inserted at the point when all
its forward references
I realize I was wrong when I answered to this forum - I could not
expect my words to be interpreted this way. Please disregard my
previous message; I also unsubscribe from the list, to make you feel
sure I don't induce anyone into wrongdoing.
RenderX (--still wondering which of the two is
-Original Message-
From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip /
Again, I *do* appreciate your concerns for the project as a whole, but I
strongly doubt whether these should be a reason to remain blind to other
peoples' approaches.
To summarize: it's all about
Nikolai Grigoriev wrote:
I realize I was wrong when I answered to this forum - I could not
expect my words to be interpreted this way. Please disregard my
previous message; I also unsubscribe from the list, to make you feel
sure I don't induce anyone into wrongdoing.
RenderX (--still
[Pardon me, Peter, for more shooting from the hip...]
--- Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--nor should FOP developers even
be looking at its internals. Matter of simple
integrity.
I think this is a bit over the top. Suppose that
tomorrow, someone gets
fired at RX or AH,
I really appreciate your enthusiasm and am very happy,
upon you finding something possibly of use to FOP on
another ML, of your bringing it back to the team. We
should just be careful in this particular case,
however.
(BTW, you may also wish to look at Xalan, Batik, and
Cocoon for other
Project: xml-fop
State: Failed
URL: http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/xml-fop/xml-fop.html
- G U M P Y
Annotations:
- Info - Made directory [/data/gump/xml-fop/build/classes]
- Error - Failed with reason build failed
11 matches
Mail list logo
