From my reading of the spec the indefinite value is only in the block
progression dimension and only applies to continuous media.
FOP is concentrating on paged media at the moment and I don't see this
being implemented any time soon.
On 2001.12.18 00:17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The option
Right now, I have a pice of code I would contribute. It would be useful, if
there were an alternative e-mail address to that of the list, to collect the
submitted code segments. Users could put this docu adress on CC, and you
could filter the stuff to heap it up somewhere until it gets used.
An alternative would be to format the item label as Symbol and to assign
it the value #183; :
fo:list-item
fo:list-item-label
fo:block start-indent=0.0mm
fo:inline font-family=Symbol#183;/fo:inline
/fo:block
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 09:59, Matthias Fischer wrote:
Right now, I have a pice of code I would contribute. It would be useful, if
there were an alternative e-mail address to that of the list, to collect
the submitted code segments.
ok, right now we don't have an alternative address
You need to take the decimal unicode encoding. Try #149; for a bullet. Check
http://www.hclrss.demon.co.uk/unicode/basic_latin.html for other codes.
Jens
Matt Laywell schrieb:
I need to insert a bullet into my fo doc. can this be done or do i need to
use an inline graphic? using sans serif
I'd prefer a more systematic approach: let's wait until the e-mail address
exists. I fear a prefix, as you proposed, is not user-friendly enough.
Before starting, we should also devise the smallest possible document into
which users could then insert their functionning examples. This would make
Title: Nachricht
i also
need an selected checkbox
on http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/TestSuite/contrib/FOP/fonts.pdf
i found no char that looks like a selected checkbox
any
idea how i can print a checkbox?
when i
try something like this:
fo:inline font-family="Symbol" #108;
/fo:inline
The place to find a character is
http://www.unicode.org/
this specifies all the unicode character.
for a check box, empty, with tick and with cross you can find it here
(actually called ballot box):
http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U2600.pdf
This will only work if you have a font that
Hello World,
I've installed FopServlet in a TomCat Server.
When I run the servlet with fo parameter (example, FopServlet?fo=my.fo),
I get the pdf.
BUT
when I run it with xsl and xml parms (FopServlet?xsl=my.xslxml=my.xml),
I get a blank screen.
I have downloaded the example code from the CVS,
Hi,
is the following code supported by fop ?
fo:list-block
fo:list-item
fo:list-item-label end-indent=label-end()
fo:block1)/fo:block
/fo:list-item-label
fo:list-item-body start-indent=body-start()
fo:blockSome text/fo:block
Hi there,
Will there be an extension to support the rendering of MathML expression
?
Thanks in advance,
=
GULA Pascal
Ingénieur d'études chez AXLOG Ingénierie
19-21 rue du 8 mai 1945
94110 ARCUEIL
Tel : 01.41.24.31.00 (Demander GULA Pascal)
Hi,
I have checked the servlet example and it works fine for me.
Once I got the right classpath and the right value for the files it
correctly worked for the fo option and for the xml+xsl option.
/fop/servlet/FopServlet?fo=extensive.fodummy=.pdf
and
On 2001.12.18 12:54 GULA Pascal wrote:
Hi there,
Will there be an extension to support the rendering of MathML expression?
Adding such an extension to FOP would be trivial.
All that is needed is a MathML to SVG converter and to add a few support
classes.
The problem is to get a MathML to
Keiron Liddle wrote:
The place to find a character is
http://www.unicode.org/
this specifies all the unicode character.
for a check box, empty, with tick and with cross you can find it here
(actually called ballot box):
http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U2600.pdf
This will only work if
keiron 01/12/18 03:57:03
Modified:.build.xml
Removed: src/org/apache/fop/tools/anttasks Xslt.java
Log:
updated to use style task and removed xslt task
Revision ChangesPath
1.50 +32 -55xml-fop/build.xml
Index: build.xml
Hello,
It works when I add
dummy=.pdf
in the end of the URL.
A small but important thing, by some reason in the example-code
(=FopServlet.java) made by Keiron it is two example call to the servelt,
one to a .fo file and one to a .xml/.xsl file, it doesn't say anything
about dummy=.pdf
I don't
Who can explain the huge performance difference we experience between
using FOP on a NT server or a PC on one side, or on a unix platform on
the other side.
Is it normal ? Is FOP built to run on PC or NT ? As it is a java
library, it is supposed to work on all platform ?
Thanks.
Nicolas
Hi Guilbert,
very interesting. If you're experiencing that FOP runs faster on a
NT-machine than on a UNIX machine then we are experiencing the same here.
The same page on my NT machine takes 1 sec whereas on the UNIX machine it
takes 10 seconds.
So far I assumed it's just a load problem of
I got much better performance on a PC running NT as compared to
Linux running on a much better machine. I was able to
get better performance on Linux using IBM's java engine
as opposed to Sun's engine.
Hope this helps.
Venu Reddy.
-Original Message-
From: GUILBERT Nicolas SIReS
Java performance has never been the same on Unix or NT. It depends on the
JVM you are using.
There have been several comparison of JVM on various OS. I don't remember
where it was nor who did it but IBM was a good choice under UNIX systems.
Hope it helps
Cyril
At 18:02 18/12/2001 +0100, you
Below I've pasted an excerpt from a post to this board a few months back. I
also posted a variation of the same question on the Weblogic.performance
newsgroup. The answer I got back was that basically that performance
difference didn't sound surprising considering the processor speed. Which
came
I had the same problem until I figured out what I was doing wrong. I'm
guessing that you're looking up the Unicode values of special characters and
then displaying them. The problem (that I had at least) was that if you're
not careful you might use the wrong expression. As you might already know
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Holle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 18 December 2001 23:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: selected checkbox
i also need an selected checkbox
on http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/TestSuite/contrib/FOP/fonts.pdf i found no
char that looks like
a
Jozef wrote:
To evade problems with fonts supporting checkboxes etc. I use
external images. I know it is not the pure, clean and scientific
solution but it always works .
We tried this also, but came across a problem if the fo:external-graphic file was
being referenced too frequently,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5495.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5495.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'm trying to print some rotated text in a document (PDF), and in the
absence of 'reference-orientation' am trying to use
in-line SVG.
Problem is the characters come out v e r y w i d e l y spaced. The code
renders 'correctly' if I try it directly in Batik.
!-- Column 2 --
!-- This will
Jetzt habe ich ihn verstanden: Es könnte sein, wir lesen aus einer Tabelle
dezimale Unicode-Werte aus und stellen sie in FO als hexadezimale Werte dar.
Kann das sein?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Dott. Matthias Fischer
abc.Mediaservice GmbH
Nebelhornstraße 8
86807 Buchloe
Tel. (08241) 9686-38
Fax
28 matches
Mail list logo
