Re: problems with keep-with-next

2002-03-15 Thread Matt Savino
Isn't it true that keep-with-next is still only implemented for the table-row element? -Matt Stephen Bannasch wrote: > > keep-with-next still doesn't work on 0.20.3 > > I tried to add a comment to: > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5434 > > but i couldn't figure out how

[PATCH] Website update

2002-03-15 Thread Jeremias Maerki
- A few other little additions. gethelp.xml is new and goes into docs/xml-docs/fop. Cheers, Jeremias Märki mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OUTLINE AG Postfach 3954 - Rhynauerstr. 15 - 6002 Luzern Fon +41 (0)41 317 2020 - Fax +41 (0)41 317 2029 Internet http://www.outline.ch doc update 20020315.dif

Re: Problem with Apache SOAP

2002-03-15 Thread alex
At 16:47 15/03/2002, Marina Pérel wrote: >Hi! >I try to do a web service with Apache SOAP. I have a NullPointerException >when i launch my client. Otherwise, when i execute my service without >SOAP, it runs and my service is deployed. >I'd like to know what the servlet rpcrouter really does wit

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7146] - top level pdf booksmarks don't work

2002-03-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: JAVA_HOME

2002-03-15 Thread Mark Bitz
Jamie, I will assume that your running on a windows platfrom since you ran the runtest.bat file. I don't have a windows 95/98/NT machine in front of me, but they are probably close to this procedure. you need to set an environment variable call JAVA_HOME to the subdirectory in which your jsdk is

Problem with Apache SOAP

2002-03-15 Thread Marina Pérel
Hi! I  try to do a web service with Apache SOAP. I have a NullPointerException when i launch my client. Otherwise, when i execute my service without SOAP, it runs and my service is deployed. I'd like to know what the servlet rpcrouter really does with the DeploymentDescriptor.xml. Thanks for

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2331] - fo:basic-link in fo:static-content throws an exception

2002-03-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: development status

2002-03-15 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
From: "Keiron Liddle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > At this stage of the design very few core problems can be solved in > isolation. So if someone wants to implement for example keeps or a colour > property, it has an impact on almost everything else in the layout. > > So what is needed and what will mak

Re: development status

2002-03-15 Thread Keiron Liddle
I'm not exactly sure what you want to know or why but I will attempt to clear a few things up. First a bit of history. About 1.5 years ago FOP reached a stage where the original design could not support adding functionality. It started approaching a "big ball of mud". More effort was put into

Re: development status

2002-03-15 Thread Keiron Liddle
On 2002.03.15 08:27 Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > I think that the FOP community needs an explanation of my intrusion. > I am a committer on the POI, Cocoon and Forrest projects, and a happy > user > of FOP for work. > I wrote an XML semantic WYSIWYG editor in java that uses Avalon and > specifies s

Re: FAQ Answers please

2002-03-15 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
From: "alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hello Joerg, > > Firstly lets set up a mailing list for discussing Apache FAQs. I think it > would be a Good Thing. > > AFAIK there is no official XML schema or DTD for FAQs, but we can come up > with one. > There is something called "xdocs" which is what most A

Re: development status

2002-03-15 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
From: "Peter B. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > >Don't get me wrong, maybe I don't understand something, but still I'm very > >puzzled. > > > Nicola, > > Your criticism here distresses me somewhat. How is anyone without > commit access able to branch the code? I have bee

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7147] New: - org/apache/batik/svg/GraphicsNodeRenderContext not found

2002-03-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

problems with keep-with-next

2002-03-15 Thread Stephen Bannasch
keep-with-next still doesn't work on 0.20.3 I tried to add a comment to: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5434 but i couldn't figure out how (probably too late at night :-) Anyway there is a very simple test case here: http://concord.org/~stephen/fop-bugs/keep-with-next-b

Re: problem building on macosx/SOLVED

2002-03-15 Thread Stephen Bannasch
I was able to build fop on macosx after removing an older version of fop.jar from /Library/Java/Extensions. The symptom was that the first taskdef in the ant build file was failing: BUILD FAILED /Users/stephen/apache/xml-fop/build.xml:273: taskdef class org.apache.fop.tools.anttasks.Serialize

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7146] New: - top level pdf booksmarks don't work

2002-03-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: development status

2002-03-15 Thread Peter B. West
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: >From: "Arved Sandstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ... > I read the FO spec fully at >least 3 times ;-) > Impossible! Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [E

Re: FAQ Answers please

2002-03-15 Thread alex
Hello Joerg, Firstly lets set up a mailing list for discussing Apache FAQs. I think it would be a Good Thing. AFAIK there is no official XML schema or DTD for FAQs, but we can come up with one. There is something called "xdocs" which is what most Apache documentation is written in. I am not s

Re: development status

2002-03-15 Thread Peter B. West
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: >From: "Peter B. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>There is very active development on FO Tree building, property >>resolution and layout models. A lot of that development is desisn >>speculation, such as the design notes I have been posting, and there is >>also a fair bit

Re: Using Avalon/Logkit

2002-03-15 Thread Christian Geisert
Jeremias Maerki wrote: [..] > That's a good point. Since I have a day off tomorrow and Michael is > doing the logging stuff, I might look into the issue if FOP and JAXP > might be able to get a bit closer together. I have already a JAXP patch from Joerg, I just had no time to apply it yet (I ho

Re: Using Avalon/Logkit

2002-03-15 Thread Keiron Liddle
sly going to be HEAD, the other I assumed was MAIN, but I'm not so > sure now.. > > Anyway, a preliminary, but fully functional patch against the > "fop-0_20_3" branch can be found here: > <http://web.vee.net/fop/AvalonLogger-patch-20020315.jar>. I just need to

Re: Using Avalon/Logkit

2002-03-15 Thread Christian Geisert
ot;maintenance" branch with co -r fop-0_20_2-maintain xml-fop > Anyway, a preliminary, but fully functional patch against the > "fop-0_20_3" branch can be found here: > <http://web.vee.net/fop/AvalonLogger-patch-20020315.jar>. I just need to > port it to t