https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45171
--- Comment #4 from Sean Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-10 12:37:20 PST
---
I switched to JRE 1.6. No difference. I set ImageIO.setUseCache(false). No
difference. Fortunately the problem is pretty consistent: FO file containin
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45171
--- Comment #3 from Andreas L. Delmelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-10
09:39:59 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I'm running Sun JRE 1.5.0_12. I can try a 1.6 JRE to see if it makes a
> difference.
>
> I tried clearing the image ca
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45171
Sean Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
---
Hi Max,
Max Berger wrote:
> Dear Fop-Devs,
>
> for the actual implementation, I think it would be a good idea to create
> a second lib-directory (e.g. buildsupport, or buildlib), and add the
> required libs there, so that we're all using the same tools. These libs
> would only be needed during bu
Dear Fop-Devs,
for the actual implementation, I think it would be a good idea to
create a second lib-directory (e.g. buildsupport, or buildlib), and
add the required libs there, so that we're all using the same tools.
These libs would only be needed during build, and not during deployment.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45171
Andreas L. Delmelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
On Jun 10, 2008, at 12:26, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
By all means, go for it.
I second this.
That can’t hurt, IMO, and this will probably be
quite helpful (or scary, maybe ;-) ).
Of course, just setting them up will not be enough. Their suggestions
will also have to be followed. Given that th
Hi Max,
By all means, go for it. That can’t hurt, IMO, and this will probably be
quite helpful (or scary, maybe ;-) ).
Of course, just setting them up will not be enough. Their suggestions
will also have to be followed. Given that there are already something
like 18,000 checkstyle warnings in the
On Jun 10, 2008, at 09:54, Max Berger wrote:
as far as I can tell, there where two issues with my cleanups
yesterday: Readablility and Performance.
I've just submitted a patch which adds a "ListUtil" class, to make
the code more readable again. I've replaced (hopefully) all
occurrences of
On Jun 10, 2008, at 01:18, Manuel Mall wrote:
Just as a background. The reason LineBreakPairTable.txt had this
'funny'
format is that it was a straight unmodified copy of the table from the
UAX#14 specification. Just open the UAX#14 spec in a browser,
select and
copy the table, paste it int
Hi Max,
Max Berger wrote:
> Dear Fop-devs,
>
> as I prepared the patch while being offline, I had not read the
> suggestion to put the code I put in "ListUtil" into "ElementListUtils".
> Just to be on the safe side: Should both classes be merged? Or is
> "elementListUtil" specific to List ?
Elem
Max Berger wrote:
Hi Max,
Vincent,
Am 09.06.2008 um 20:01 schrieb Vincent Hennebert:
There’s a point that I’d like to further discuss: why wouldn’t we
implement Retroweaver/Retrotranslator in the Trunk? If we go the
cautious route, that is if we run the test suite on a 1.4 jvm after each
i
Dear Fop-devs,
as I prepared the patch while being offline, I had not read the
suggestion to put the code I put in "ListUtil" into
"ElementListUtils". Just to be on the safe side: Should both classes
be merged? Or is "elementListUtil" specific to List ?
Max
Vincent,
Am 09.06.2008 um 20:01 schrieb Vincent Hennebert:
There’s a point that I’d like to further discuss: why wouldn’t we
implement Retroweaver/Retrotranslator in the Trunk? If we go the
cautious route, that is if we run the test suite on a 1.4 jvm after
each
introduction of a 1.5 feature
Dear Fop-Devs,
since this came up, here is a list of tools I use for software quality
checking (and all them them can check for generic list types). All of
them have Eclipse and maven plugins (and ant tasks, and )
Checkstyle: checkstyle.sf.net
(already configured in fop, so nothing nee
Dear Fop-Devs,
as far as I can tell, there where two issues with my cleanups
yesterday: Readablility and Performance.
I've just submitted a patch which adds a "ListUtil" class, to make the
code more readable again. I've replaced (hopefully) all occurrences of
size() - 1 with the call to t
16 matches
Mail list logo
