/show_bug.cgi?id=31570
page break and keep together do not work well together
Summary: page break and keep together do not work well together
Product: Fop
Version: 0.20.5
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity
/show_bug.cgi?id=18038
duplicated links on page break, in table with keep-together each row
Summary: duplicated links on page break, in table with keep-
together each row
Product: Fop
Version: 0.20.5
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
/show_bug.cgi?id=18038
duplicated links on page break, in table with keep-together each row
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-16 13:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=5354)
XSLFO that reproduces the problem
/show_bug.cgi?id=18038
duplicated links on page break, in table with keep-together each row
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-16 13:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=5356)
Screen capture of Adobe Acrobat showing the duplicate links
/show_bug.cgi?id=17830
FOP0.20.5rc and keep-together=retrieve-marker doesn't work correctly
Summary: FOP0.20.5rc and keep-together=retrieve-marker doesn't
work correctly
Product: Fop
Version: 0.20.5
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Other
/show_bug.cgi?id=17830
FOP0.20.5rc and keep-together=retrieve-marker doesn't work correctly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
/show_bug.cgi?id=3044
keep-together not functioning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
/show_bug.cgi?id=7449
Large table row with keep-together=always runs FOP infinitely
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Hy
I to, had problems with the keep-together. I tried it with blind tables,
but it
seemed not to work with Fop 0.20.4.
I thought, it was a new bug since Fop 0.20.3.
With Fop 0.20.2 it had worked within tables.
Is it so ?
Regards
P.Steiner
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von
Steiner, Priska wrote:
I to, had problems with the keep-together. I tried it with blind tables,
but it
seemed not to work with Fop 0.20.4.
h'm, afaik it works for me, post small snippet of your fo.
--
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Multiconn International, Israel
. Oktober 2002 11:47
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: can I hack a keep-together?
Steiner, Priska wrote:
I to, had problems with the keep-together. I tried it with blind tables,
but it
seemed not to work with Fop 0.20.4.
h'm, afaik it works for me, post small snippet of your fo.
--
Oleg
Steiner, Priska wrote:
there is a snippet of my .xsl.
Note that Oleg asked for a relevant *FO* snippet. Posting parts
of XSLT code is often insufficient for tracking down problems.
However, you are lucky, in your special case:
fo:table-row
fo:table-cell padding-top=0.5cm
Hello,
I am exploring the possibility of modifying the code to allow support for
keep-together. I'm pressed for time; so a hack will work. I would
appreciate any input on if this is possible and how long it would take?
Thank You,
Shaifali Prakash
CHT / Media Entertainment
San Francisco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am exploring the possibility of modifying the code to allow support for
keep-together. I'm pressed for time; so a hack will work. I would
appreciate any input on if this is possible and how long it would take?
Search the source for keep- (case insensitive
Mete Kural wrote:
Is there any estimate on when the keep-together
property will be implemented?
No.
The FOP Project is great although as you know it's
still being developed. While I wait for FOP to be
developed, what other free XSL-FO formatters can I use
to generate PDFs?
Try passivetex
J.Pietschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Try passivetex. You have to install a full TEX package, apart from
this it is quite excellent.
Doesn't it also have problems with keep-* attributes?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hello FOP committers,
Is there any estimate on when the keep-together
property will be implemented?
The FOP Project is great although as you know it's
still being developed. While I wait for FOP to be
developed, what other free XSL-FO formatters can I use
to generate PDFs? I'm in dire need
/show_bug.cgi?id=3044
keep-together not functioning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
/show_bug.cgi?id=3044
keep-together not functioning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
/show_bug.cgi?id=3044
keep-together not functioning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From
David B. Bitton wrote:
Can someone give me a 100 words or less on keep-together? What I'm most
confused is using 1 through 9 as apposed to always. I think my
keep-together problem would be solved with this, but I'm not sure how to use
it. Tx :)
I don't think keep-together will solve your
/show_bug.cgi?id=7449
Large table row with keep-together=always runs FOP infinitely
Summary: Large table row with keep-together=always runs FOP
infinitely
Product: Fop
Version: 0.20.3
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status
I have been away for a while, and haven't been able to read all the mails
from the mailinglist. Since my return i answered some questions, but not to
much...
therefore this might been said before, but that i missed it.
I saw there is a new release of FOP (fop-0.20.3rc2-src.tar.gz). I'm using
Hi Suhail,
Actually to keep two different FO together, you need to use
keep-with-next or keep-with-previous. The keep-together property means
to keep an entire FO in the same page or column (if possible). For
example, if you put keep-together on an fo:block, FOP should try to keep
the whole
to keep together
Hi,
As keep-together is not supported in
FOP as of now how can i ensure that a table
and a preceding block appear together on the
same page..
Please pass on any ideas u have..
Thanks in advance,
Suhail
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi,
As keep-together is not supported in
FOP as of now how can i ensure that a table
and a preceding block appear together on the
same page..
Please pass on any ideas u have..
Thanks in advance,
Suhail
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
=3044
*** shadow/3044 Wed Aug 8 08:26:09 2001
--- shadow/3044.tmp.5558Wed Aug 8 08:26:09 2001
***
*** 0
--- 1,128
+ ++
+ | keep-together not functioning
At 09:36 AM 7/17/01 +0100, Alex McLintock wrote:
--- Struan Judd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If so might I request a small departure from the XSL:FO spec, if it is
straight-forward to implement. Please allow keep-together on fo:table-row.
I don't think deviations from the XSL:FO spec
Im XSL FO spec in article 6.7.9 fo:table-row keep-together, keep-with-
previous and keep-with-next properties are listed in The following
properties apply to this formatting object:. So why is keep-together
on table-row considered against spec?
pa
On 17 Jul 2001, at 9:36 Alex McLintock wrote
Subject: Re: Keep-together (and the other keep-*'s)
It's not against spec in my book either, but it's currently not
implemented in FOP, for table-row or for anything else.
The problem with all that keep-* stuff is that it's not that easy to do.
Actually, I was kind of mulling it over
to implement. Please allow keep-together on fo:table-row.
TTFN
Struan Judd * And so it begins ... ICQ: 4498196
http://neongraal.sf.org.nz
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Voicemail and Fax: +1 (201) 305-1011 x1006
Hi there,
Is there a chance, that the keep-together-property will be realised in
a (nearly)future release ???
When I use this property, it causes no error, but it also will not work
properly...
Is there another way to the same functionality about other properties ?
thx ANDREAS
Hello,i
have the following table:fo:table
keep-together.within-page="always"by using keep together the table
should not be broken at the end of thepage.FOP 0.17 doesn't give
any error messages.But the table is split at the end of the page.How can
I prevent the table from breaki
Falk,
keep-together is not supported presently..
Try keep-with-previous or
keep-with-next..
That may help.
Raju Dave
- Original Message --
Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:04:27 +0200
Subject: keep
Hello,
i have the following table:
fo:table keep-together.within-page=always
by using keep together the table should not be broken at the end of the
page.
FOP 0.17 doesn't give any error messages.
But the table is split at the end of the page.
How can I prevent the table from breaking ?
Thanks
in the parent block
but the blocks are still splitting across pages. I have also tried adding the
keep-together attribute to each of the list blocks, but they still split
across pages.
Is there a way to use the keep-together.within-page attribute to keep a block
and it's sub-blocks together?
Thanks
36 matches
Mail list logo
